Skip to main content
Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group logoLink to Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group
. 2009 Aug 18;18(3):208–215. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00053

Improving the process and outcome of care in COPD: development of a standardised assessment tool

Paul Jones 1,*, Gale Harding 2, Ingela Wiklund 3, Pamela Berry 3, Nancy Leidy 2
PMCID: PMC6619275  PMID: 19690787

Abstract

Introduction:

A major goal of COPD treatment is to reduce symptom burden and ensure that the patient's health is as good as possible. This goal requires regular systematic assessment of the patient's COPD with clear and efficient communication between the patient and clinician.

Aim:

To explore patient and physician descriptions of COPD attributes, in order to inform content development of a patient-reported clinical assessment tool.

Methods:

Qualitative research methods (one-to-one interviews and patient focus groups) were used to elicit key characteristics to evaluate COPD health status and explore how patients with COPD experience their condition. ATLAS.ti version 5.0 was used to identify major themes and generate an item pool.

Results:

Fifty-eight patients with COPD (GOLD stages 1–4; MRC grades 2–5) and 10 clinicians participated in this research. Twenty-one items were generated, capturing patient assessment of breathlessness, wheeze, cough, sleep, activity limitation, energy/fatigue, social function, and anxiety.

Conclusions:

This qualitative study identified a broad range of items that are potentially suitable for inclusion in a short, simple COPD assessment tool for use in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), optimal management, health status assessment, questionnaire, chronic bronchitis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (508.1 KB).

Footnotes

PJ has received fees from pharmaceutical companies, including GlaxoSmithKline, for speaking at meetings and participating in advisory board meetings and has received support for research from GlaxoSmithKline.


Articles from Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group are provided here courtesy of Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited

RESOURCES