Genome-Wide Linkage Analysis of Human Auditory Cortical Activation Suggests Distinct Loci on Chromosomes 2, 3, and 8

Abstract

Neural processes are explored through macroscopic neuroimaging and microscopic molecular measures, but the two levels remain primarily detached. The identification of direct links between the levels would facilitate use of imaging signals as probes of genetic function and, vice versa, access to molecular correlates of imaging measures. Neuroimaging patterns have been mapped for a few isolated genes, chosen based on their connection with a clinical disorder. Here we propose an approach that allows an unrestricted discovery of the genetic basis of a neuroimaging phenotype in the normal human brain. The essential components are a subject population that is composed of relatives and selection of a neuroimaging phenotype that is reproducible within an individual and similar between relatives but markedly variable across a population. Our present combined magnetoencephalography and genome-wide linkage study in 212 healthy siblings demonstrates that auditory cortical activation strength is highly heritable and, specifically in the right hemisphere, regulated oligogenically with linkages to chromosomes 2q37, 3p12, and 8q24. The identified regions delimit as candidate genes TRAPPC9, operating in neuronal differentiation, and ROBO1, regulating projections of thalamocortical axons. Identification of normal genetic variation underlying neurophysiological phenotypes offers a non-invasive platform for an in-depth, concerted capitalization of molecular and neuroimaging levels in exploring neural function.

Introduction

Modern neuroimaging can ideally provide reliable and stable non-invasive measures of human brain function. The neurophysiological basis of the measured signals can be examined, but their correspondence with molecular-level phenomena remains difficult to explore. Genetic influences on brain structure and function provide a promising, indirect route to the molecular mechanisms of imaging signals. The heritability of brain macrostructures and cortical patterning (Bartley et al., 1997; Baaré et al., 2001; Thompson et al., 2001; Geschwind et al., 2002; Schmitt et al., 2008), as well as brain functions (van Beijsterveldt et al., 1996; Koten et al., 2009), has been widely explored by means of twin studies. Such studies cannot, however, propose links between specific genes and neuroimaging measures. These connections have been sought by associating single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of predefined candidate genes with neuroimaging mappings, especially in clinical populations (Egan et al., 2001; Meyer-Lindenberg, 2010) and increasingly also in healthy subjects (Smolka et al., 2005; Mueller et al., 2011). However, this approach leaves open the role of other genes in the observed neuroimaging effect.

Here, we apply a markedly different approach by studying genome-wide linkage in healthy young adults to discover involvement of hitherto unsuspected genes in normal neurophysiology. The crucial starting point for the present strategy is the choice of an imaging phenotype that is stable and robust but highly variable between individuals. An auditory cortical activation that is generated at ∼100 ms after sound onset and widely used to probe reactivity of the auditory cortices in electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings provides such a candidate. The 100 ms responses (N100 in EEG and N100m in MEG) can be evoked by any change in the auditory environment, but they also reflect stimulus-specific neural activity (Hari, 1990). N100m compiles activity mainly from the area posterior to the primary auditory cortex in the Heschl's gyrus, thereby including the planum temporale (PT) (Godey et al., 2001); intracranial recordings of the homologous response in monkeys suggest a current source in the cortical lamina III (Steinschneider et al., 1994). N100 response amplitudes are highly heritable (Anokhin et al., 2007; Turetsky et al., 2008), although salient environmental effects have also been demonstrated, e.g., use-dependent functional reorganization of N100m responses to piano tones in musicians (Pantev et al., 1998). In clinical populations, N100/N100m responses are affected, e.g., in schizophrenia (Roth et al., 1980), Parkinson's disease (Pekkonen et al., 1995), and dyslexia (Helenius et al., 2002).

In the present study, MEG responses to tones presented alternately to the right and left ear were measured in 212 healthy volunteer siblings. Subsequently, a genome-wide linkage analysis was conducted to identify genetic loci underlying the measured phenotypes of N100m. Crucial for bridging the gap between micro- and macro-level neuroscience, uncovering of genetic determinants for the N100m response provides, to our knowledge, the first non-invasive method of describing normal variation in molecular mechanisms of human cortical reactivity.

Materials and Methods

Subjects.

Two hundred twelve Finnish-speaking adults gave their informed consent to participate in the study. The subject group consisted of 92 full-sibling pairs, eight families with three siblings, and one family with four siblings (mean ± SEM age, 30 ± 1 years; 148 females, 64 males; 208 right-handed, three ambidextrous, and one left-handed; no monozygotic twins). None of the subjects had a history of hearing, neurological, or psychiatric disorders. All participants gave their written informed consent, and the study had previous approval from the Ethical Committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa.

MEG experiment.

Auditory evoked fields were recorded in a magnetically shielded room while the subject remained seated with the head supported against the helmet-shaped bottom of the 306-channel Vectorview (Elekta Oy) neuromagnetometer. The device contains 102 identical triple sensors, comprising two orthogonal planar first-order gradiometers that measure the tangential derivatives ∂B_z/∂x and ∂B_z/∂y of the magnetic field component normal to the helmet surface at the sensor location and one magnetometer, each of them coupled to a superconducting quantum interference device.

Tones of 50 ms, 1 kHz (rise and fall times of 15 ms) were delivered alternately to the left and right ear at an interstimulus interval of 2 s. Hearing thresholds were determined separately for each ear before the measurement, and, during the MEG experiment, the sounds were delivered at 65 dB (sensation level) through plastic tubes and ear pieces.

The MEG signals were bandpass filtered at 0.03–200 Hz and sampled at 600 Hz. Four head-position-indicator coils were attached to the scalp, and their positions were measured with a three-dimensional digitizer; the head coordinate frame was anchored to the two periauricular points and the nasion. The head position with respect to the sensor array was determined by briefly feeding current to the marker coils before the actual measurement. The horizontal and vertical electro-oculograms were recorded to discard data contaminated by eyeblinks and movements. The experiment was conducted in two ∼5 min blocks, separated by 15–20 min. The replicability of the responses was ensured by visually comparing the overlaid responses from the two measurement blocks in each individual. The MEG responses were averaged across trials, for a time window extending from 200 ms before the stimulus onset to 1000 ms after it, and they were digitally low-pass filtered at 40 Hz. A minimum of 80 responses were averaged for each subject.

Response amplitudes (with respect to the base level in the 200 ms prestimulus interval) and normalized response durations (peak latency divided by the duration from +50 to −50% of the maximum activation on the ascending/descending sides) of the N100m response were determined from the channel pair showing the maximum response—as vector sum of the gradients $\sqrt{{\left(\partial B_Z/\partial x\right)}^2+\left({\left(\partial B_Z/\partial y\right)}^2\right)}$—separately for each hemisphere. Such sensor-level measurements are well replicable and in accordance with results obtained by source modeling approaches (Virtanen et al., 1998). Importantly, these measures can be obtained with minimal subjective decisions on the data. Subsequently, the measured values were submitted to statistical testing, including a heritability analysis (see below).

Genotyping.

DNA was extracted from blood samples with Qiagen FlexiGene DNA Kit and genotyped on Affymetrix 250K StyI SNP array. Genotype calling was done in Affymetrix Genotyping Console software using the BRLLM algorithm for samples with an initial success >92.9%. Additional quality control filtering was done using Plink version 1.07 [http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink/ (Purcell et al., 2007)]: the exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) genotyping success <95% per sample and <98% per SNP; (2) minor allele frequency <5%; and (3) deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in two subsets of 101 unrelated samples with p < 0.0001. The relatedness of individuals was checked based on identity-by-state similarity. After quality control, 207 individuals and 149,998 autosomal SNPs remained; the overall genotyping success was 99.8%, and lowest success per individual was 98.1%.

Heritability and linkage analysis.

Phenotype heritabilities were calculated based on all successfully phenotyped individuals (n = 212) using the variance component option of Merlin 1.1.2 (Abecasis et al., 2002). Before the analysis, the normality of the phenotype distributions was tested from a subset of unrelated individuals; the phenotypes were logarithmically transformed when this improved their normality.

The genotypes were checked using the error detection and correction option of Merlin, and the likely erroneous genotypes were coded as missing. A linkage analysis (n = 207) was conducted with the variance component option in Merlin, using the built-in linkage disequilibrium (LD) correction feature to account for the density of SNPs (Abecasis and Wigginton, 2005).

For comparison, the analysis was conducted on a subset of 28,218 SNPs that had been pruned for LD (r² < 0.1 in Plink), excluding the sibling pairs that were not of the same sex, and by using a regression-based linkage approach (Sham et al., 2002).

The genome-wide significance of the observed logarithm of odds (LOD) scores was determined by simulations. Three hundred datasets without any genetic linkages but with phenotypes, relatedness between individuals, and missing genotype patterns identical to the real data were simulated in Merlin. For each simulation and phenotype, the highest simulated LOD score per chromosome was recorded, resulting in an empirical distribution of LOD scores. The significance of the observed LOD scores was evaluated by counting from the distribution of simulated LODs the expected number of peaks (n_exp) with a LOD score equal or higher to the observed LOD score. Thus, we estimated how many times per simulation, on average, a LOD score exceeding the observed one was detected. The lower the n_exp, the less likely it is to obtain as high a LOD score by chance, without the involvement of any genes. According to the standard guidelines by Lander and Kruglyak (1995), observed LOD scores with n_exp < 0.05 were declared significant and those with n_exp < 1 suggestive.

Because linkage scans were performed for several phenotypes, the overall significance level was corrected for multiple comparisons by calculating the proportion of the simulations in which the four highest scores across the phenotypes exceeded the observed four suggestive or significant LOD scores.

Results

MEG responses

The N100m responses peaked at 91 ± 1 ms (mean ± SEM) and 99 ± 1 ms for opposite-sided (contralateral) versus same-sided (ipsilateral) stimuli in the left auditory cortex and at 87 ± 1 and 96 ± 1 ms in the right auditory cortex. The responses were overall stronger in male than female subjects (p < 0.01), in accordance with previous studies (Salmelin et al., 1999).

The responses between the two experimental runs, overlaid, were visually compared in each individual: The within-subject variability between the measurement sessions was very small, whereas the response strengths varied by >10-fold across subjects (Fig. 1). The responses were quantified by measuring their absolute amplitudes, the amplitude ratios of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses, and the normalized response durations (peak latency divided by response duration).

Figure 1.

MEG signals. Responses at the sensor that displayed the maximum signal strength over the right hemisphere, when the auditory stimulus was given to the left ear. A, Subject S1: signals from two recordings separated by 20 min, overlaid (black and gray). B, The response of subject S1 (black) at ∼100 ms after stimulus onset (time 0) and the corresponding response of her sibling (gray) are remarkably similar. C, Marked differences are apparent between the responses of subject S1 (black) and an unrelated subject (gray).

Heritability analysis

All four response amplitudes (left/right hemisphere, ipsilateral/contralateral stimulation) showed statistically significant correlations across siblings (p < 0.001, Bonferroni corrected; Fig. 2); the heritability estimates h² varied between 0.68 and 0.83. Heritability did not exceed 0.5 for any of the amplitude ratios or the normalized response durations (Table 1).

Figure 2.

MEG phenotypes. The logarithmically transformed MEG amplitudes in all sibling pairs (horizontal axis, Sibling #1; vertical axis, Sibling #2; femtoteslas per centimeter) and the correlation coefficients R. All four response amplitudes (left/right hemisphere, ipsilateral/contralateral stimulation) were statistically significantly correlated across siblings (p < 0.001).

Table 1.

The heritability estimates (from Merlin) for all measured MEG phenotypes (n = 212)

Phenotype	h2 value
LH contralateral amplitude	0.81
LH ipsilateral amplitude	0.83
LH ipsilateral/contralateral amplitude	0.38
LH contralateral response duration	0.30
LH ipsilateral response duration	0.06
RH contralateral amplitude	0.68
RH ipsilateral amplitude	0.73
RH ipsilateral/contralateral amplitude	0.28
RH contralateral response duration	0.46
RH ipsilateral response duration	0.48
LH contralateral/RH ipsilateral amplitude	0.34
RH contralateral/LH ipsilateral amplitude	0.10

LH, left hemisphere; RH, right hemisphere. Bold font denotes values exceeding 0.5.

Genome-wide linkage analysis

A variance component-based linkage analysis between the four amplitude value phenotypes and ∼150,000 autosomal SNPs revealed linkage for the right-hemispheric but not for the left-hemispheric amplitudes (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Linkage analysis. A, LOD scores of variance component-based linkage analysis between the four amplitude-value phenotypes and ∼150,000 autosomal SNPs, plotted against genomic location in centimorgan units. The threshold LOD scores for significant and suggestive results are indicated by continuous and dashed lines, respectively. The white and gray shading denotes even- and odd-numbered chromosomes. B, The insets provide an enlarged view of the chromosomes with significant or suggestive linkage, highlighted with red rectangles in A.

A locus on chromosome 2q37.2–37.3 was significantly linked to right-hemispheric ipsilateral amplitudes (LOD score = 3.32, n_exp = 0.040) and suggestively linked to right-hemispheric contralateral amplitudes (LOD = 3.01, n_exp = 0.14). Furthermore, a locus on chromosome 3p12.2–12.3 was suggestively linked to the right-hemispheric contralateral amplitudes (LOD = 2.55, n_exp = 0.43) and a locus on chromosome 8q24.3 to the ipsilateral amplitudes (LOD = 3.27, n_exp = 0.053). The overall probability of observing an equally significant result by chance in four linkage scans was p = 0.037. The genes located in the chromosome areas with significant or suggestive LOD scores and their currently proposed functions are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Genes with Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) number and their demonstrated functions, located within the three linkage peak areas with a suggestive or significant LOD score in the present study

Gene symbol	Gene name	OMIM number(s)	Information in OMIM
Peak 2q37.2 - 2q37.3a
SH3BP4	SH3-domain binding protein 4	605611	Ubiquitously expressed
AGAP1	Centaurin, gamma-2	608651	Membrane traffic and actin cytoskeleton dynamics
GBX2	Homeobox protein GBX-2	601135	Embryonal development including the brain
CXCR7	Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 7	610376	Cell growth, survival and adhesion
COL6A3	Collagen, type VI, alpha 3	120250, 158810, 254090	Collagen subunit encoding; related to Bethlem myopathy and Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy (UCMD)
MLPH	Melanophilin	606526, 609227	Pigmentation; related to Griscelli syndrome type 3 (GS3)
PRLH	Prolactin releasing hormone	602663	Regulation of lactation and pregnancy
RAB17	RAB17, member RAS oncogene family	602206	Regulation of membrane trafficking in the epithelium
LRRFIP1	Leucine rich repeat in FLII-interacting protein 1	603256	Regulation of transcription
RAMP1	Receptor activity modifying protein 1	605153	Constituent and modifier of a calcitonin-related receptor
SCLY	Selenocysteine lyase	611056	Selenium metabolism
HES6	Hairy and enhancer of split 6 (Drosophila)	610331	Transcriptional regulation during development
PER2	Period homolog 2 (Drosophila)	603426, 604348	Circadian rhythm regulation; related to familial advanced sleep-phase syndrome
TRAF3IP1	TRAF3-interacting protein 1	607380	Formation and function of microtubules and zebrafish cilia
ASB1	Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 1	605758	Regulation of signal transduction via suppression of cytokine signaling
TWIST2	Twist homolog 2 (Drosophila)	607556, 227260	Cytokine signaling regulation; related to Setleis syndrome
HDAC4	Histone deacetylase 4	605314, 600430	Transcription repression via histone deacetylation; related to brachydactyly-mental retardation syndrome (BDMR)
NDUFA10	NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 1 alpha subcomplex, 10	603835, 256000	Electron transport chain of mitochondria; related to the neurodegenerative Leigh syndrome (LS)
OTOS	Otospiralin	607877	Synthesized by fibrocytes in the inner ear; related to deafness in guinea pigs
GPC1	Glypican 1	600395	Endostatin binding
RNPEPL1	Arginyl aminopeptidase-like 1	605287	Ubiquitously expressed
CAPN10	Calpain 10	605286, 601283	Susceptibility gene for type II diabetes (NIDDM)
GPR35	G-protein-coupled receptor 35	602646	Transduction of signals into intracellular effects
AQP12A	Aquaporin 12A	609789	Pancreas-specific expression
KIF1A	Kinesin family member 1A	601255, 610357, 614213, 614255	Transport of synaptic-vesicle precursors along axons; related to autosomal dominant mental retardation (MRD9), hereditary sensory neuropathy type IIC (HSN2C) and autosomal recessive spastic paraplegia (SPG30)
AGXT	Alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase	604285, 259900	Peroxisomal liver enzyme; related to type I primary hyperoxaluria (HP1)
PASK	PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase	607505	Glycogen synthesis; Drosophila homolog involved in wrapping of axons by glial cells
PPP1R7	Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 7	602877	Constituent and modifier of a protein phosphatase
ANO7	Anoctamin 7	605096	Expressed in prostate
HDLBP	High-density lipoprotein binding protein	142695	Binds high-density lipoprotein molecules, may remove excess cellular cholesterol
SEPT2	Septin 2	601506	Coupling of DNA damage response regulation to the cytoskeleton
STK25	Serine/threonine protein kinase 25	602255	Epithelial and neuronal cell polarity and axon outgrowth
BOK	BCL2-related ovarian killer	605404	Apoptosis in the ovary
THAP4	THAP domain containing 4	612533	Protein coding
ATG4B	ATG4 autophagy related 4 homolog B (S. cerevisiae)	611338	Autophagy (in yeast)
DTYMK	Deoxythymidylate kinase	188345	Phosphorylation catalyzing enzyme in DNA synthesis
ING5	Inhibitor of growth family, member 5	608525	Regulation of cell cycle
D2HGDH	d-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase	609186, 600721	Dehydrogenase enzyme; related to d-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria (D2HGA1)
GAL3ST2	Galactose-3-O-sulfotransferase 2	608237	Sulfate group transfering enzyme
NEU4	Sialidase 4/neuraminidase 4	608527	Enzyme cleaving terminal sialic acid residues
PDCD1	Programmed cell death 1	600244, 126200, 152700, 605218	Cell surface receptor involved in immunomodulation; related to systemic lupus erythematosus and multiple sclerosis
Peak in 3p12.2 - 3p12.3b
ROBO2	Roundabout, axon guidance receptor, homolog 2 (Drosophila)	602431, 610878	Axon guidance receptor; related to vesicoureteral reflux 2 (VUR2)
ROBO1	Roundabout, axon guidance receptor, homolog 1 (Drosophila)	602430, 606896	Axon guidance receptor; candidate gene for dyslexia susceptibility 5 (DYX5)
GBE1	Glucan (1,4-α-), branching enzyme 1	607839, 232500	Glycogen synthesis; related to glycogen storage disease IV
Peak in 8q24.3c
TRAPPC9	Trafficking protein particle complex 9	611966, 613192	Neuronal signaling pathway; related to autosomal recessive mental retardation (MRT13)

^a+59 genes without OMIM information: 9 pseudogenes, 7 micro-RNAs, 17 hypothetical loci, 2 open reading frames, and 24 others.

^b+9 genes without OMIM information: seven pseudogenes, one microRNA, and one other.

^c+3 genes without OMIM information: two hypothetical loci and one pseudogene.

Highly concordant results to the variance-component analysis were obtained by alternative or complementary methods, such as regression analysis, by using SNPs pruned for LD and when including data from same-sex sibling pairs only. When sex was used as a covariate in the linkage analysis, three of the previously observed peaks were reproduced: right-hemispheric ipsilateral amplitudes were significantly linked to chromosome 8q24.3 (LOD = 3.81, n_exp = 0.027) and suggestively to chromosome 2q37.3 (LOD = 3.18, n_exp = 0.15). Right-hemispheric contralateral amplitudes were suggestively linked to chromosome 2q37.3 (LOD = 2.98, n_exp = 0.56), whereas the linkage between right-hemispheric contralateral amplitudes and chromosome 3 remained nonsignificant (LOD = 2.58, n_exp = 1.11). Moreover, the analysis yielded additional suggestive peaks on chromosome 4q13.2–13.3 for left-hemispheric contralateral amplitudes (LOD = 2.71, n_exp = 0.82) and on chromosomes 5q35.2 (LOD = 2.53, n_exp = 0.70) and 11p11.2 (LOD = 2.43, n_exp = 0.85) for right-hemispheric ipsilateral amplitudes.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate high heritability of the auditory cortical N100m response strength in normal population, with specific linkages to genome areas on chromosomes 2, 3, and 8. Our results thus confirm the previous EEG results on the heritability of N100 responses (Anokhin et al., 2007; Turetsky et al., 2008). Notably, however, whereas heritability analyses may include effects stemming from the shared environment of the experimental subjects, our finding of genetic correlates for the neuromagnetic responses implicates a true genetic component in the observed effect.

The human auditory cortices, located bilaterally at the supratemporal plane, receive input from both ears, with stronger and earlier neural responses in the hemisphere opposite to the stimulated ear (Reite et al., 1981). We found genetic linkages for the right-hemispheric N100m responses, although both left- and right-hemispheric responses were highly heritable. On the one hand, this observed difference between the hemispheres may indicate a larger environmental component on the left-hemispheric processes. On the other hand, the result may reflect influence of a larger number of genes on the left- than right-hemispheric processes, with any one gene having an effect that is too small to be detected by the linkage analysis. The auditory cortices at the right versus left superior temporal gyri differ anatomically and functionally, with denser and more heterogeneous subsystems in the left hemisphere both at the microcellular and macrocellular level. Pyramidal cells at the left PT are larger in size and density (Hutsler and Gazzaniga, 1996), and the left PT can contain more subsystems than the right PT within the same volume, suggesting superior fine-grained intrinsic connectivity (Galuske et al., 2000). Similarly at the macroscopic level, white-matter tracts linking temporal and frontal lobes are more widespread and greater in volume in the left hemisphere (Powell et al., 2006; Rilling et al., 2008). From the functional point of view, several neuroimaging studies have pointed to asymmetries in the temporal cortices, especially in language-related tasks. The right and left auditory cortices have been suggested to be predominantly sensitive to spectral and temporal changes, respectively (Zatorre and Belin, 2001; Obleser et al., 2008), with the right auditory cortex having a more constrained computational role (Obleser et al., 2008). Furthermore, the left-hemispheric responses are affected by linguistic background, in a gender-related manner (Salmelin et al., 1999). Such findings are suggestive of a more complex genetic influence on the left auditory cortical responses, likely requiring a larger experimental subject population than was available in the present study for linkage detection.

The amplitude of an evoked response is thought to reflect the size of the active neuronal population or the degree of neuronal synchrony within the cortical area. The remarkable similarity of the response latencies across sibling pairs in the present study suggests that variation in neural synchrony was not a major factor. Rather, genetic influence seems to be reflected in the number of activated neurons. Human auditory areas comprise multiple fields with different cytoarchitectures (Galaburda and Sanides, 1980; Rivier and Clarke, 1997). The N100m likely integrates activation from several close-by fields, and thus—in addition to general auditory onset detection (Näätänen, 1988)—reflects functions needed for combining auditory stimulus features and for binaural interaction (McEvoy et al., 1994). The current genetic finding could thus be reflected in either the microanatomy or macroanatomy (or both) of the auditory cortical areas. However, establishing causal relationships between detailed neuronal architecture and non-invasively measured responses is likely to require intracortical approaches, especially in the auditory areas in which comparisons of cytoarchitectonic maps relative to macroanatomic landmarks have demonstrated considerable individual variation (Rademacher et al., 2001).

The regions emerging in the genome-wide linkage analysis contain several genes relevant to brain function. At the location of the suggestive linkage on chromosome 8, TRAPPC9 encodes NIBP (NIK- and IKK-β-binding protein) that is expressed in neurons and participates in the nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway involved in synaptic plasticity and neuronal differentiation (Hu et al., 2005). Homozygous truncating mutation of TRAPPC9 has been detected recently in patients with autosomal recessive mental retardation, mild cerebral white-matter hypoplasia, and thin corpus callosum (Mir et al., 2009; Mochida et al., 2009).

The linkage peak on chromosome 2, near the long-arm telomere in a typically gene-rich region, contains >60 genes and several micro-RNA loci. The peak is broad and does not allow the pinpointing of specific genes. However, this region contains genes of considerable interest for their known functions, such as GBX2 (gastrulation brain homeobox 2), GPR35 (G-protein receptor 35), KIF1A (axonal transporter of synaptic vesicles), and OTOS (otospiralin). We suggest that any of these genes might serve as a functional candidate for the linkage to chromosome 2q.

On chromosome 3p12.3, the suggestive linkage was observed around the centromere, peaking at the axon guidance receptor gene ROBO1. ROBO1 is a member of the roundabout family of midline axon guidance receptors (Kidd et al., 1998). Robo1 knock-out mice have defects in corticothalamic and thalamocortical signaling, and at least one copy of the gene is required for the formation of corpus callosum and other commissures (Andrews et al., 2006); callosal connections contribute to auditory N100m responses via input from the contralateral to ipsilateral auditory cortex (Mäkelä and Hari, 1992). In humans, ROBO1 has been implicated as a susceptibility gene for dyslexia (Hannula-Jouppi et al., 2005), and its polymorphisms are associated with phonological buffer deficits (Bates et al., 2011). Dyslexic subjects show diminished right-hemispheric ipsilateral N100m auditory responses (Parviainen et al., 2005).

The current study was designed to evoke prominent N100m responses in all subjects. The other obligatory components of the auditory evoked magnetic field at ∼50 ms (P50m) and ∼200 ms (P200m) were also evident in the data but, because of their low amplitude and thus small between-subject variability, were not included in the analyses. The middle-latency component P50 has been suggested to show heritable effects in EEG settings (Young et al., 1996; Hall et al., 2006; Anokhin et al., 2007). The genetic layout of P50m could be addressed in future studies optimally designed to increase its prominence with respect to the late cortical components.

Separate components of the auditory evoked responses mature at different rates during the development, possibly reflecting changes in axon myelination and synaptic mechanisms that may play a role more generally across sensory systems (Eggermont, 1988). Because two of the candidate genes in the current study, ROBO1 and TRAPPC9, are associated with such processes in the CNS, the current results prompt comparative analyses of their influence on evoked responses in other sensory modalities. Similarly, the complex interaural interactions after binaural auditory stimulation could be addressed in future experiments, especially because ROBO1 has been suggested recently to play a role in altered interaural interaction in dyslexic individuals with ROBO1 deficiency (Lamminmäki et al., 2012).

In conclusion, our current approach provides a promising platform (1) for elucidating the molecular basis of cortical phenotypes, via genetic mapping and, vice versa, (2) for exploiting neuroimaging to track down functionally relevant genes whose exact roles may then be examined using molecular techniques. For example, developmental dyslexia with a strong behavioral manifestation of problems in reading and phonological processing has been associated, on the one hand, with a complex genetic predisposition including ROBO1 and, on the other hand, with functional brain imaging correlates, such as diminished auditory N100m responses. Our present data suggest a direct link between ROBO1 and auditory cortical responses in normal neurophysiology. This combination of imaging and genetic data can thus yield insights into human brain development and its various behavioral manifestations.