Abstract
Attaching/Effacing (A/E) bacteria include human pathogens enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), and their murine equivalent Citrobacter rodentium (CR), of which EPEC and EHEC are important causative agents of foodborne diseases worldwide. While A/E pathogen infections cause mild symptoms in the immunocompetent hosts, an increasing number of studies show that they produce more severe morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised and/or immunodeficient hosts. However, the pathogenic mechanisms and crucial host-pathogen interactions during A/E pathogen infections under immunocompromised conditions remain elusive. We performed a functional screening by infecting interleukin-22 (IL-22) knockout (Il22-/-) mice with a library of randomly mutated CR strains. Our screen reveals that interruption of the espF gene, which encodes the Type III Secretion System effector EspF (E. coli secreted protein F) conserved among A/E pathogens, completely abolishes the high mortality rates in CR-infected Il22-/- mice. Chromosomal deletion of espF in CR recapitulates the avirulent phenotype without impacting colonization and proliferation of CR, and EspF complement in ΔespF strain fully restores the virulence in mice. Moreover, the expression levels of the espF gene are elevated during CR infection and CR induces disruption of the tight junction (TJ) strands in colonic epithelium in an EspF-dependent manner. Distinct from EspF, chromosomal deletion of other known TJ-damaging effector genes espG and map failed to impede CR virulence in Il22-/- mice. Hence our findings unveil a critical pathophysiological function for EspF during CR infection in the immunocompromised host and provide new insights into the complex pathogenic mechanisms of A/E pathogens.
Author summary
Emerging evidence demonstrates that attaching/effacing (A/E) pathogens, the important causative agents of foodborne illnesses, cause more severe morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms during A/E pathogen infections under immunocompromised conditions have remained obscure. More specifically, the critical host-pathogen interactions that account for the severe symptoms are not fully understood. Utilizing an immunodeficient mouse model for a functional screening, we have identified E. coli secreted protein F (EspF) as a critical virulence protein that plays a pivotal role in A/E pathogen Citrobacter rodentium (CR) infection-induced severe morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised animals. We have also revealed that the EspF-dependent disruption of tight junctions is crucial for the loss of colonic epithelial barrier function and the systemic spread of pathogens during infection. Our findings highlight the previously underappreciated pathophysiological relevance of EspF during A/E pathogen infections and increase our understanding of the sophisticated pathogenic mechanisms of foodborne diseases.
Introduction
The human pathogens enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) are the leading causative agents for foodborne diseases, which lead to severe economic burden, morbidity, and mortality worldwide [1,2,3,4]. EHEC, EPEC and their murine equivalent Citrobacter rodentium (CR) cause attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions, characterized by the attachment of the bacteria to host epithelial cells and the localized destruction of brush-border microvilli [5,6]. Notably, CR shares 66.7% of its genes and most pathogenic mechanisms with EPEC and EHEC [5,7,8,9,10,11]. Since human pathogens EPEC and EHEC do not infect mice well [3], CR infection in mice has been widely used as an animal model to study the pathogenic mechanisms of A/E pathogens. There are approximately 5,000 genes in each genome of EHEC, EPEC, and CR. However, only a miniscule portion of the encoded genes, including the best-characterized gene cluster locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island, has been functionally related to A/E pathogenicity [12,13]. It is therefore believed that a substantial amount of essential host-pathogen interactions during A/E pathogen infections in vivo remain poorly understood.
After the peak of CR colonization, the infection starts to clear and epithelial cells colonized by CR are shed into the intestinal lumen, with complete bacterial clearance occurring after 2–4 weeks of infection [2]. Wild-type C57Bl/6 mice and many immunocompetent strains show little or no mortality with CR infection; in striking contrast, interleukin-22 knockout (Il22-/-) mice display dramatically elevated morbidity and mortality rates during CR infection [14]. Patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type (carrying autoantibodies against IL-22) are more susceptible to various infections including A/E pathogens than healthy controls with normal IL-22 levels [15,16,17,18,19]. While it is believed that A/E pathogens adapt to the gastrointestinal tract and undergo a virulence change after adapting to the host [2], the virulence regulation of A/E pathogens, especially in immunocompromised or immunodeficient settings, remain elusive.
Besides serving as a selectively permeable barrier permitting the absorption of nutrients, the intestinal epithelium is critical for maintaining an effective defense against intraluminal toxins, antigens, and enteric flora [20]. In particular, tight junctions (TJs) in the apical domain of epithelial cells, comprised of transmembrane proteins (e.g. claudins and occludin) and cytosolic scaffold proteins (e.g. zonulae occludens [ZO] and cingulin), are crucial in preventing the entry of potentially harmful entities including bacterial pathogens [20]. A/E pathogens use the Type III secretion system (T3SS) to inject an array of virulence proteins (effectors) from the bacterial cytoplasm into the host cell cytoplasm, where they interfere with host cell signaling [3,6,21]. A/E pathogens are known to manipulate the signaling pathways related to TJ dynamics, opening this structure and triggering watery diarrhea in immunocompetent hosts [20,22]. For instance, the T3SS effectors EspF (E. coli secreted protein F), EspG (E. coli secreted protein G), Map (Mitochondrial associated protein), and NleA (Non-LEE encoded effector A) were shown to be required for A/E pathogen-induced disruption of the TJ strands and decreased transepithelial resistance (TER) in cultured monolayer cells [23,24,25,26,27,28]. TJ disruption by T3SS effectors injected by A/E pathogens has been studied extensively, mainly through a variety of in vitro approaches [23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31], with a few studies examining the relevance of EspF, Map, and NleA during infections in immunocompetent animals [22,28,32,33,34,35,36,37]. However, it remains poorly understood how these effectors are regulated when A/E pathogens adapt to the hosts, how they disrupt the TJ strands, and dampen intestinal epithelial barrier function during infections in the hosts.
Here through an in vivo functional screening by infecting Il22-/- mice with wild-type CR or genetically manipulated mutant strains, we reveal that EspF, a multifunctional effector, plays a critical function in CR-caused severe morbidity and mortality in Il22-/- mice by damaging TJ strands and disrupting colon epithelial integrity. Chromosomal deletion of espF, but not the other TJ-damaging effector genes espG and map, eliminated CR-induced severe lethality in Il22-/- mice without affecting the colonization, proliferation, and clearance of CR in the host. Moreover, EspF deletion markedly attenuated CR infection-caused TJ disruption in the colon and systemic dissemination of CR in infected Il22-/- animals. Our results therefore reveal an important pathophysiological function of EspF in host-pathogen interactions during infections and provide new insights into A/E pathogenic mechanisms.
Results
Generation of a CR mutant library by Tn5 transposon random mutagenesis
For a systemic analysis of the genes encoded in the CR genome, we utilized the Tn5 transposon-mediated random mutagenesis [38] to genetically manipulate the CR genome in wild-type CR (DBS 100 strain). The mutant CR strains, in which the Tn5 transposon was randomly inserted into the CR genome, were screened using kanamycin resistance (S1 Fig). After removing the mutants with growth defects, we generated a CR random mutant library with approximately 1,800 Tn5-interrupted CR mutant strains, which was divided into 18 sub-libraries (~100 strains each) (S1 Fig).
Identification of EspF as a critical virulence protein for CR infection in Il22-/- mice
To explore the novel virulence protein(s) that is critical for CR infection-caused severe mortality and morbidity in Il22-/- mice, we infected Il22-/- mice by oral gavage with each individual mutant strain from the first 5 sub-libraries of CR random mutants (S1 Fig). Consistent with previous findings [14], wild-type CR infection in Il22-/- mice led to 100% mortality within 14 days post inoculation (dpi) (Figs 1A and S2A). As expected, the mortality rates of Il22-/- mice infected with most randomly mutated strains were comparable to that of animals with wild-type CR infection (Figs 1A and S2A). In striking contrast, infecting Il22-/- mice with two mutant CR strains, i.e. Mut-19 in the sub-library C and Mut-61 in the sub-library D, failed to cause any mortality even at 28 dpi (Figs 1A and 1B and S2A and S2B). Tn5 transposon-targeted PCR followed by Sanger sequencing revealed that the Tn5 transposon was inserted into the escN gene coding the essential structural component EscN of the T3SS [3] in Mut-61 CR (S2C Fig) and the espF gene coding a T3SS effector EspF [39] in Mut-19 CR (Fig 1C), respectively. Indeed, the Tn5 transposon interruption caused major truncations in EscN and EspF proteins, which could substantially impair the proteins’ functions (Figs 1C and S2C). Consistent with the crucial role of EscN in T3SS function and CR colonization as shown in previous studies [3], the escN-interrupted Mut-61 CR failed to colonize in Il22-/- mice at 7 dpi (S2D Fig). In contrast, the espF-interrupted Mut-19 CR exhibited no colonization defect in Il22-/- mice (S2D Fig), suggesting that EspF could play an important role beyond colonization in CR pathogenesis.
In line with the severe mortality (Fig 1A and 1B), infection with wild-type CR caused more body weight loss and elevated clinical score (referring to both weight loss and diarrhea severity) in Il22-/- mice within 7–14 dpi (Fig 1D and 1E). In contrast, animals infected with Mut-19 CR exhibited less weight loss, reduced diarrhea severity, and no mortality (Fig 1B, 1D and 1E). These results suggest that an intact espF gene could be crucial for CR infection-caused severe symptoms in Il22-/- mice. Moreover, the levels of EspF were significantly elevated in CR derived from the infected Il22-/- mice than those in the bacteria cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (Fig 1F), hinting that EspF could play an important function during CR infection in vivo. Together these results indicate that the T3SS effector protein EspF could be pivotal for CR-caused severe mortality and morbidity in Il22-/- mice.
Deletion of espF attenuates CR virulence in Il22-/- mice
To rule out the possible off-target effect by Tn5 transposon insertion in Mut-19 CR, a ΔespF strain, in which the espF gene was chromosomally deleted [40] (Fig 2A), was utilized to ascertain our findings. We first monitored the growth dynamics of wild-type and ΔespF CR in LB culture, in order to examine whether EspF impacts bacterial proliferation. Indeed, ΔespF strain exhibited no defect in bacterial growth in LB media, compared to wild-type CR (Fig 2B). We then carried out in vitro infection assays to assess the capacities of wild-type and ΔespF CR strains to attach to primary mouse colon epithelial cells (CECs), and observed that wild-type and ΔespF CR attached to CECs in comparable numbers (Fig 2C). These results demonstrate that EspF is dispensable for CR colonization and proliferation in vitro.
To assess the impact of EspF on CR virulence, we infected Il22-/- mice with wild-type and ΔespF CR strains. Consistently, infection with wild-type CR caused substantial weight loss, elevated clinical score, and severe lethality with 100% death in Il22-/- mice within 14 dpi (Fig 2D–2F); whereas ΔespF CR infection resulted in substantially less weight loss, attenuated diarrhea severity and mortality in the infected animals (Fig 2D–2F), as did the Mut-19 CR strain (Fig 1A–1D). These results further underscore that EspF is critical for CR-caused severe mortality and morbidity in Il22-/- mice. We further examined the colonization and proliferation capacities of wild-type CR and ΔespF strain in the infected Il22-/- colon by counting viable CR recovered from the stool samples. The colony formation units (CFUs) of wild-type and ΔespF CR in feces derived from infected Il22-/- mice at 3 and 7 dpi were almost identical (Fig 2G). Therefore, deletion of espF does not impact CR colonization and proliferation in the infected Il22-/- mice in vivo, ruling out the possibility that EspF ablation alters bacterial burden to abolish the morbidity and mortality rates in infected animals.
To ascertain that EspF accounts for the attenuated mortality in ΔespF strain-infected Il22-/- mice, we inoculated Il22-/- animals with ΔespF::espF strain, in which the ΔespF strain was chromosomally complemented with a functional copy of espF (Fig 2A). Indeed, the complementation strain fully restored CR virulence in the infected Il22-/- mice, as illustrated by the dramatic weight loss and 100% mortality rate, as the wild-type CR did (Fig 2H and 2I). Thus, our results further underscore the requirement of EspF for the CR infection-induced mortality and morbidity in Il22-/- mice.
The ΔespF strain still causes colonic inflammation in Il22-/- mice
We sought to perform pathological analyses on the colonic tissues from Il22-/- mice infected with PBS, wild-type CR, or ΔespF strain to assess the impact of EspF on the host responses at the epithelial surface. Indeed, wild-type CR infection, unlike the PBS control, caused discernible morphological damage to the infected colon, characterized by the shortening in colon length (Fig 3A). In contrast, no colon length shortening was observed in Il22-/- animals infected with ΔespF CR or treated with PBS control (Fig 3A). Moreover, histological analyses revealed that wild-type CR infection caused severe damage to colon epithelial tissue in Il22-/- mice, characterized by intestinal crypt elongation, goblet cell depletion, and immune cell infiltration (Fig 3B and 3C). Unexpectedly, ΔespF CR infection still resulted in substantial infiltration of immune cells and moderate tissue damage in the Il22-/- colons, as illustrated by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining-based histological analyses (Fig 3B and 3C). In line with the evidence that the ΔespF strain has almost identical colonization and proliferation rates as wild-type CR in infected Il22-/- mice (Fig 2G), deletion of espF slightly attenuated CR induced inflammatory response and tissue damage to colon epithelia in Il22-/- mice.
EspF is essential for systemic CR spread in Il22-/- mice
Given the observed severe tissue damage in the colon derived from wild-type CR-infected Il22-/- mice (Fig 3B and 3C), we monitored bacterial load in the peripheral organs of infected animals at the peak of infection, to assess the impact of EspF on the translocation of CR through the damaged colonic epithelium. Indeed, CR burden in the liver and the spleen was not detectable in PBS control-inoculated animals; conversely they were markedly elevated in wild-type CR-infected Il22-/- mice (Fig 3D). In striking contrast, the augmented CR burden in these peripheral organs was completely abolished in the mice infected with ΔespF strain (Fig 3D), which suggests that EspF is crucial for the systemic spread of CR during infection. Moreover, we orally administrated FITC-dextran to the infected Il22-/- mice at the peak of infection and assessed colonic barrier function by measuring translocated FITC-dextran in serum. As expected, wild-type CR infection led to significantly elevated serum levels of FITC-dextran in Il22-/- mice, indicating severe barrier dysfunction (Fig 3E). In contrast, the serum levels of FITC-dextran in PBS- and ΔespF CR–infected Il22-/- mice remained at comparable low levels (Fig 3E). These results suggest that EspF plays a pivotal role for CR in increasing colonic epithelial permeability, thus accelerating the systemic spread of CR during infection in Il22-/- mice.
EspF is indispensable for CR infection-caused colon epithelial tight junction disruption
As previous studies showed that EspF was capable of damaging TJ transmembrane proteins [23,41], we first ascertained the impact of EspF on TJ integrity during CR infection in vitro using CMT-93 cells, a murine rectal carcinoma cell line that possesses differentiated epithelial characteristics including junctional complex and microvilli [42]. Indeed, at 3 h post infection, the protein levels of claudin-3, one of the most abundant TJ transmembrane proteins [43,44], were profoundly decreased in CMT-93 cells infected with wild-type CR, in comparison to PBS control (S3 Fig), indicating impaired claudin-3 dynamics or possible degradation, as previously shown in other types of cells [41]. Consistently, when ΔespF CR was employed, claudin-3 protein levels remained intact to a similar extent as those in mock-infected cells (S3 Fig). Our results confirmed that EspF is crucial for CR infection induced TJ disruption in CMT-93 cells in vitro.
We further examined whether CR infection triggers TJ disruption in the colon of infected Il22-/- animals. As assayed by immunofluorescence staining, CR infection led to a clearly disorganized distribution of claudin-3 on colon tissue sections derived from Il22-/- mice infected with wild-type CR, compared to PBS control, at 7 dpi (Fig 3F). Moreover, the mean fluorescence intensity of claudin-3 was substantially weakened in wild-type CR-infected colon sections, which indicates altered claudin-3 dynamics or degradation during CR infection in vivo, consistent with previous studies in immunocompetent animals [22,33]. In contrast, ΔespF CR infection failed to cause the disorganized distribution of claudin-3 on colon tissue sections (Fig 3F), although the attachment of ΔespF CR to colonic epithelium was identical to, if not higher than, that of wild-type CR. Indeed, as illustrated by immunoblot on the derived colonic epithelial lysates, wild-type CR infection caused striking decreases in the protein levels of occlusive claudins (e.g. claudin-3, -4, -6, -11, and -19) and pore-forming claudins (e.g. claudin-2 and -15), as well as some TJ-associated proteins and EspF-interacting proteins including ZO-1, 14-3-3σ, profilin, and arp2 in the infected Il22-/- mice (Figs 3G and 3H and S4). In contrast to WT CR-infected animals, the levels of colonic claudin-3, -4, -6, -10, -11, and -19 derived from ΔespF CR infected mice remained comparable to, or even higher than, those in PBS-inoculated controls (Fig 3G and 3H). Interestingly, EspF deletion in CR led to smaller impacts on pore-forming claudin-2 and claudin-15 than on the occlusive claudins (Fig 3G and 3H), which is indicative of an EspF-mediated differential impact on these two important classes of claudins in TJs.
To examine whether EspF is crucial for other activities (such as bloodstream survival, immune evasion, and extra-intestinal colonization) during CR systemic dissemination, we infected Il22-/- mice with a mixed inoculum that contained WT CR and ΔespF CR at a 1:1 ratio. As expected, the WT-ΔespF CR coinfection in Il22-/- mice led to severe body weight loss, 100% lethality, and systemic dissemination of CR in the liver and the spleen (S5A–S5C Fig), as WT CR alone did (Figs 2D and 2E and 3D). Our PCR-based identification verified the WT-ΔespF ratio (47% versus 53%) in the mixed inoculum (S5D Fig). Interestingly, the WT-ΔespF ratios in the CR derived from the liver and the spleen of the mixed CR-infected Il22-/- mice at 7 dpi remained comparable to that at 0 dpi (S5D Fig), indicating that ΔespF CR does not possess competitive disadvantage in systemic dissemination when colonic barrier is disrupted. ΔespF CR exhibited similar capability of disseminating from the colon to the peripheral organs compared to WT CR, which suggests that EspF appears dispensable for bloodstream survival, immune evasion, and extra-intestinal colonization during CR systemic dissemination. Hence, these results, in line with the systemic spread of CR (Fig 3D) and augmented epithelial membrane permeability (Fig 3E), suggest that EspF is critical for CR-induced TJ disruption in the colon of Il22-/- mice.
The N-terminal 119 residues of EspF is sufficient for CR-induced lethality in Il22-/- mice
EspF is conserved among A/E pathogens with a highly conserved N-terminal region and a C-terminal region consists of various eukaryotic-like proline-rich repeats (PRRs). EPEC-, EHEC-, and CR-EspF harbor 3, 4, and 5 copies of PRRs, respectively (S6A Fig), whereas the pathophysiological relevance of these PRRs has not been extensively investigated yet. To explore the possible role of PRRs within EspF in CR-caused lethal colitis in Il22-/- mice, we generated full-length and truncated CR-EspF constructs in pACYC184 plasmid (S6B Fig). Among the constructs, full-length and truncated PRR1, PRR2, and PRR3 were ectopically expressed in ΔespF CR; whereas the expression of PRR0 (only N-terminus without any PRR) and PRR4 (containing the first 4 PRRs) was not detectable, most likely due to the instability of the truncated proteins (S6C Fig). Indeed, the plasmid-complemented ΔespF/pEspF-Flag CR restored CR virulence in the infected Il22-/- mice, assayed by body weight loss and lethality (S6D and S6E Fig), as the chromosomally complemented ΔespF::espF strain and wild-type CR did (Figs 2H and 2I and S6D and S6E). Interestingly, ΔespF strains that express PRR1, PRR2, or PRR3 all led to more severe body weight loss and quicker mortality in Il22-/- mice, compared to ΔespF/pEspF-Flag CR (S6D and S6E Fig), which suggests that the N-terminus and PRR1 within EspF are sufficient to execute its pathogenic function in CR-induced lethality in Il22-/- mice. Of note, a conserved functional mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS) within the N-terminus of EspF was identified previously and substitution of the 16th leucine with glutamic acid (L16E) in EspF completely abolished its mitochondrial localization [45]. To examine whether the N-terminal MTS, particularly the leucine-16 of EspF plays an important role in CR-induced lethality in Il22-/- mice, we generated ΔespF/pEspF(L16E)-Flag CR (S7A Fig) and confirmed that EspF-Flag proteins were expressed at comparable levels in ΔespF/pEspF-Flag CR and ΔespF/pEspF(L16E)-Flag CR (S7B Fig). Infecting Il22-/- mice with ΔespF/pEspF(L16E)-Flag CR or ΔespF/pEspF-Flag CR led to severe body weight loss and 100% mortality rate at 16 dpi (S7C and S7D Fig), indicating that N-terminal 16th leucine and MTS are not critical for EspF function in CR-caused lethality in Il22-/- mice. Together our results support the essential role of N-terminal 119 amino acids containing the PRR1 in EspF-mediated CR pathogenesis in Il22-/- mice.
Tight junction-disrupting virulence genes are upregulated during CR infection
We further carried out qRT-PCR assays to examine the transcriptional regulation of known virulence genes disrupting TJ dynamics during CR infection in Il22-/- mice. Indeed, the messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of Ler, an essential virulence regulatory gene [46], in wild-type CR derived from the infected Il22-/- mice at 7 dpi were dramatically elevated compared to those in CR from LB culture (Fig 4A), which supports that CR undergoes substantial transcriptional rearrangement when adapting to the host [3]. In line with the elevated EspF protein levels in CR derived from the infected Il22-/- mice (Fig 1F), the mRNA levels of espF were markedly higher in the host-derived CR compared to those in LB-cultured bacterium (Fig 4A), as did those of espG, map, and nleA encoding other known TJ-damaging virulence proteins (Fig 4A). Hence these results suggest that many virulence genes encoding TJ-disrupting effectors are upregulated in general, in line with the severe damage to colonic epithelial barrier integrity (Fig 3D), during CR infection in Il22-/- animals.
A specific role of EspF for CR infection-induced virulence in Il22-/- mice
To examine whether the known TJ-disrupting effectors EspF, EspG, Map, and NleA execute redundant functions at colonic epithelia during CR infection in vivo, we assessed their relevance in CR infection-caused mortality in Il22-/- mice. When cultured in LB medium in vitro, ΔespG, Δmap, and ΔnleA strains harbored the same proliferation dynamics as wild-type and ΔespF CR (Fig 4B), suggesting that none of these genes are essential for bacterial growth. To assess their effects on the CR burden during infections in vivo, we inoculated them into Il22-/- animals. Our analyses showed that the fecal CFUs of wild-type, ΔespF, ΔespG, and Δmap CR derived from the infected mice at 7 dpi were largely comparable (Fig 4C), indicative of intact colonization and proliferation of CR in the host. In contrast, the fecal CFUs of ΔnleA CR were dramatically attenuated compared to other strains (Fig 4C), indicating a marked defect in CR colonization and proliferation in vivo. We therefore excluded the ΔnleA strain from infection-induced lethality in Il22-/- mice. Consistent with our above findings (Fig 2D and 2E), infection with ΔespF CR caused minor body weight loss and no death in Il22-/- mice, even after 21–28 dpi (Fig 4D and 4E). In striking contrast, despite similar colonization and proliferation, infections with ΔespG and Δmap strains led to remarkable body weight loss, diarrheal symptoms, and severe mortality with 100% death within 14 dpi in Il22-/- mice, as did wild-type CR (Fig 4D and 4E). These results suggest that EspF plays a specific role, rather than a redundant function to other TJ-disrupting effectors EspG and Map, in CR infection-caused severe lethality in Il22-/- mice.
Discussion
Gastrointestinal infections caused by A/E pathogens EPEC and EHEC, which are associated with diarrheal diseases, impose significant economic burdens and remain a major public health issue [1,2,3]. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of EPEC/EHEC will greatly facilitate new discoveries for treatment against EPEC/EHEC infections in humans. Unfortunately, EPEC and EHEC do not infect mice well under specific pathogen free conditions, which substantially impedes disease modeling and discoveries of pathogenic mechanisms, especially the host-pathogen interactions in pathophysiological settings. The majority of the pathogen-encoded genes and pathogenic strategies are shared among EPEC, EHEC, and their murine equivalent CR, which makes CR infection in mice a widely used small animal model to investigate the EPEC/EHEC pathogenicity, although a substantial amount of pathophysiological pathogen-host interactions are still elusive [3]. A/E pathogens are known to cause a self-limited infection with transient inflammation and mild symptoms in immunocompetent hosts [3]. A recent study demonstrates that CR infection triggers a strikingly elevated mortality in Il22-/- mice, but not wild-type C57Bl/6 animals [14]. Moreover, the Global Enteric Multicenter Study reveals that EPEC is a leading cause of lethality associated with diarrhea among children less than 12 months of age [20,23,39]. The low circulating IL-22 levels in human neonates was speculated to be a significant risk factor for serious infections in the neonatal period [47]. These mouse model and epidemiological studies underscore the severe symptoms and outcomes of A/E pathogen infections in immunocompromised and/or immunodeficient hosts. However, studies of A/E pathogens in immunocompromised and/or immunodeficient settings significantly lag behind those of immunocompetent settings. Hence there is an urgent need to identify the crucial bacterial virulence proteins in A/E pathogens that are important for the infection-associated severe symptoms in the immunocompromised conditions.
CR infection-caused striking phenotypes, i.e. severe mortality, in Il22-/- mice and the well-established genetic manipulation in CR allowed us to systematically explore novel virulence protein(s) critical for CR infection-associated virulence in the immunocompromised host and identify EspF as a key effector under pathophysiological condition. EspF, located on the fourth operon of LEE pathogenicity island, was originally identified based on its similarity in amino acid sequence, i.e. the proline-rich repeats, to eukaryotic motifs [39]. Such eukaryotic motifs allow EspF to interact with many host proteins after injection via the T3SS, thus manipulating diverse cellular processes, in particular disruption of the epithelial barrier [48]. The first finding that relates EspF to epithelial barrier disruption was an observation made in EPEC infection on T84 monolayers [23]. While EPEC produces a disorganized distribution of occludin, a major TJ transmembrane protein, leading to progressive loss of TER [23,24], an espF mutant was deficient in distributing occludin from the TJs and disrupting TER of T84 monolayers [23]. Moreover, EspF was proposed to interact with a variety of proteins involving in actin nucleation and TJ dynamics such as sorting nexin 9 (SNX9), SNX33, N-WASP, profilin, ZO-1, ZO-2, and actin [29,30,31,49]; however, the precise mechanism on EspF-mediated TJ protein redistribution is yet to be elucidated [20]. It is noteworthy that while EspF has been extensively investigated using in silico analyses, yeast double hybrid assays, recombinant proteins, and in vitro infection models [29,30,31,49], only few studies explored the relevance of EspF during A/E pathogen infections in immunocompetent hosts in vivo [22,28,32]. Our results demonstrate that EspF is transcriptionally regulated in CR at the host-pathogen interface during infection in vivo. More importantly, our findings reveal that EspF is an indispensable effector crucial for CR infection-induced severe mortality in animals under immunocompromised conditions, thus suggesting another important and pathophysiological function to this multifunctional bacterial effector that is conserved among A/E pathogens.
TJs in the colon epithelium are critical for preventing the entry of pathogens as well as enteric flora during A/E pathogen infections [20]. In opposition, A/E pathogens inject various T3SS effectors into the host cell, where they manipulate the signaling pathways associated with TJ dynamics [20]. The T3SS effectors EspF, EspG, Map, and NleA were previously reported to be critical for A/E pathogen-induced decrease in TER when different types of cells cultured in monolayer were infected [23,24,25,26,27]. Of note, these effectors interact with distinct proteins and disturb different TJ transmembrane proteins and cytosolic scaffold proteins in the host cells, ranging from claudins, occludin, ZO-1/2 to actin [20]. However, the exact transmembrane and scaffold proteins within the complex TJ structure disrupted by EspF, EspG, Map, and NleA have not been fully understood. Mediated by their distinct multifunctional nature, these effectors are speculated to independently disrupt TJ strands through distinct mechanisms [50] or function in a coordinated manner [20]. That said, the relevance of all these effectors have not been investigated in the same pathophysiological setting. Intriguingly, deletion of espF alone, but not espG or map, highly attenuates CR virulence in Il22-/- mice, suggesting that they do not function in a redundant or synergistic relationship under this specific condition. Of note, EspF deficiency does not abolish the CR infection-initiated inflammatory response and colonic tissue damage, consistent with the dispensable role of EspF in forming A/E lesions in T84 intestinal epithelial cells by EPEC in vitro [23]. However, deletion of espF completely abolishes the CR infection-dependent TJ disruption, epithelial barrier loss, and severe lethality in Il22-/- animals. In summary, we reveal that EspF-targeted TJ disruption is pivotal for maintaining epithelial permeability and coordinating mucosal immune activation during CR infection under immunocompromised conditions.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were performed according to protocol number MO16H285, approved by the Johns Hopkins University’s Animal Care and Use Committee and in direct accordance with the NIH guidelines for housing and care of laboratory animals. Il22-/- (IL-22 knockout) mice in C57Bl/6 background [47] were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility and fed autoclaved food and water ad libitum.
Cell culture, antibodies, reagents, and plasmids
CMT-93 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and mouse CECs isolated as previously described [51], were cultured in DMEM medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 M glutamine, 100 U ml-1 penicillin, and 100 U ml-1 streptomycin. Antibodies used were: DnaK (8E2/2, 50667656), claudin-3 (34–1700), claudin-15 (38–9200), ZO-1 (40–2300) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Halethorpe, MD); claudin-4 (A12, sc-376643), claudin-6 (A-4, sc-393671), claudin-10 (G-12, sc-373946), claudin-11 (D-8, sc-271232), claudin-19 (C-5, sc-365967), Arp2 (E-2, sc-137250), Profilin (B-10, sc-137235), 14-3-3σ (E-11, sc-166473) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX); β-actin (AC-15, A5441) and Flag (M2, F3165) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO); claudin-2 (ab53032) from Abcam (Cambridge, MA); EspF antiserum was described previously [39]; and polyclonal antiserum specific for Citrobacter rodentium was generated using heat-killed CR as an immunogen following a standard immunization protocol. 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The full length and truncated EspF-Flag were amplified from wild-type C. rodentium genomic DNA using the primers detailed in S2 Table, and cloned into pACYC184 plasmid using Gibson Assembly Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA). The EspF(L16E) mutant was generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the Quick Change Kit (NEB) with appropriate primers for L16E. All constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing.
Random mutagenesis in Citrobacter rodentium
Wild-type C. rodentium (DBS 100 strain) [51] was randomly mutagenized by Tn5 transposon insertion, using an EZ-Tn5-KAN-2 TNP Transposome Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA), per the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 20 ng of EZ-Tn5 Transposase enzyme and the EZ-Tn5 <KAN-2> Transposon were electroporated using a Bio-Rad MicroPulser (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) using program Ec1 with pulse controller set at 1.8 kV into electrocompetent wild-type C. rodentium where the EZ-Tn5 transposase was activated by Mg2+ in the host’s cellular environment resulting in random insertion of the EZ-Tn5 Transposon into C. rodentium genomic DNA. The Tn5-interrupted C. rodentium mutants were recovered in pre-warmed SOC medium, plated onto LB agar plates containing 25 μg/ml of kanamycin, and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. All colonies were picked and propagated in 96-well plates in LB medium containing 50 μg/ml of kanamycin. Arbitrary PCR followed by Sanger sequencing was carried out to determine the transposon insertion site in C. rodentium genome.
Citrobacter rodentium culture
Wild-type, ΔespF, ΔespG, ΔnleA, Δmap strains of C. rodentium were previously described [34,40,52], as detailed in S1 Table. The ΔespF::EspF was generated using the “scar”-free in-frame deletion method using the suicide vector pRE112 via sacB-based allelic exchange [53], with the primers detailed in S2 Table. The C. rodentium strains were grown from single colonies on LB plates in LB broth at 37°C overnight with shaking. For growth curve measurement, the overnight C. rodentium culture was diluted at 1: 200 and grown at 37°C with shaking, and 100 μL of C. rodentium culture was taken at indicated time periods to read OD600 on a 96-well plate using a POLARStar Omega Plate Reader (BMG Labtech, Cary, NC).
Citrobacter rodentium infection in vitro
Infection of CR in CMT-93 and mouse CECs was performed as previously described [51]. Briefly, CR was washed with ice-cold PBS and resuspended in pre-warmed corresponding media. Bacteria concentration was measured by absorbance at optical density 600, followed by a serial dilution and seeding on a MacConkey agar plate to confirm the administered colony-forming units (CFU). The CMT-93 cells (grown as a monolayer) and isolated CECs (in suspension) were infected with CR at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100 for 3 h, followed by whole cell lysis and immunoblotting or immunofluorescence staining. CR attachment to CECs was determined as the numbers of CR that attached to individual CEC, as previously described [51].
Citrobacter rodentium infection in mice
Male Il22-/- mice (8 to 16 weeks) were fasten for 8 h before orally inoculated with 200 μl of PBS containing 2 × 109 CFU of indicated CR strains or PBS alone. Mice were observed daily for weight and morbidity, and the disease clinical scores were calculated as the sum of weight loss and diarrhea, using the following criteria as previously described [19]: weight loss (0 point = none, 1 point = 1%-5% weight loss, 2 points = 5%-10% weight loss, 3 points = 10%-15% weight loss, 4 points = more than 15~20% weight loss and 5 points = more than 20% weight loss); stool consistency/diarrhea (0 points = normal, 2 points = diarrhea (Feces consisting of well-formed pellets will be recorded as normal, whereas yellowish mud-like feces will be recorded as diarrhea), 4 points = watery diarrhea.
Bacterial counts
For fecal CR burden analysis, stool was collected from live animals at various times post inoculation; for CR dissemination analysis, the liver and the spleen were collected from euthanized mice at 7 days post inoculation. The stool and tissue were homogenized, and diluted in PBS, and plated on MacConkey agar plates, incubated overnight at 37°C. CR CFUs were enumerated the following day and normalized to the stool or tissue weight.
FITC-dextran assays
FITC-dextran assays for intestinal permeability were conducted as previously described [54]. Briefly, mice were orally administrated with 150 μL of 80 mg/mL FITC-dextran (4,000 Da, FD4, Sigma) in PBS. After 4 h, mice were anaesthetized and blood was collected by cardiac punctures. To deter coagulation, blood samples were immediately added to a final concentration of 3% acid-citrate dextrose (20 mM citric acid, 100 nM sodium citrate, and 5 mM dextrose) and centrifuged 1,000 × g at 4°C for 12 min. Plasma was collected for fluorescence reading using a BioTek Synergy HT microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT) at excitation 485/20 nm and emission 528/20 nm.
Colon tissue collection, histology, and immunofluorescence
Histology and immunofluorescence staining of colon tissue sections were performed as previously described [55]. In brief, after euthanizing mice, the colons were removed under aseptic conditions, the terminal 0.5-cm piece of the colon was fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h, embedded in paraffin and 5-micron sections were cut and processed for Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. Histopathology scores were determined using the following criteria as previously described [51]. For immunofluorescence staining, the colon tissue sections were subjected to antigen retrieval in Citrate buffer (pH 6.0), washed with PBS, and blocked with appropriate sera in PBS. After incubating with appropriate antibodies, sections were washed and incubated with fluorescence dye-conjugated second antibodies and 1 μg/ml of DAPI. Stained sections were washed and mounted under a coverslip using Fluoro-gel with Tris Buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) and examined on a Leica DMi8 fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Immunoblot
Immunoblot assay was conducted as previously described [51]. In brief, cells or colon tissues were harvested and lysed on ice by 0.4 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 × complete protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN]) for 30 min. The lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min, followed by a separation by SDS-PAGE under reduced and denaturing conditions. The resolved protein bands were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and probed by the Super Signaling system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and imaged using a FluorChem E System (Protein Simple, Santa Clara, CA).
Quantitative real-time PCR
After euthanizing mice, the colons were removed under aseptic conditions. 5 cm of colon were dissected longitudinally with lumen facing up, and the colon luminal contents consisting of colonized bacteria were scraped and suspended in bacterial enhancement reagent (Life Technologies). Bacterial total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies), followed by the elimination of genomic DNA using TURBO DNA-free Kit (Life Technologies). Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was performed using qScript cDNA SuperMix Kit (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD). Target genes were amplified using SsoAdvanced SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) with primers listed in S3 Table.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Standard errors of means (s.e.m.) were plotted in graphs. Multiple comparison tests (either using One-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis depending on data distribution) followed by post-hoc tests (either Bonferroni’s or Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests) were detailed in the figure legends. Statistical analysis on survival curves was performed using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test and Bonferroni corrections were applied for multiple comparisons. Significant differences were considered: ns, non-significant difference; * at p < 0.05; ** at p < 0.01; *** at p < 0.001; **** at p < 0.0001.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Cynthia Sear and Kimberly Davis (Johns Hopkins University), Michael Donnenberg (Virginia Commonwealth University), Chaodong Wu (Texas A&M University) and John Garber (Harvard Medical School) for sharing reagents; and Wanliang Shi (Johns Hopkins University) for insightful discussions.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by grants GM111682 (to FW), AI137719 (to FW), CA009110 (to XX) from the National Institutes of Health, USA; 31870131 (to LL), 31500628 (to LL) from National Natural Science Foundation of China; BK20161555 (to LL) from Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China; 2018RS3027 (to KF) from Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department, China. DX was supported by a Career in Immunology Fellowship from American Association of Immunologists; YL is supported by a Predoctoral Fellowship 19PRE34380234 from American Heart Association; KF is supported by Huxiang Talent Aggregation Project from the Hunan Science and Technology Department of China; BAV is the CH.I.L.D. Foundation Research Chair in Pediatric Gastroenterology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Mead PS, Griffin PM (1998) Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lancet 352: 1207–1212. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01267-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wiles S, Clare S, Harker J, Huett A, Young D, et al. (2004) Organ specificity, colonization and clearance dynamics in vivo following oral challenges with the murine pathogen Citrobacter rodentium. Cellular microbiology 6: 963–972. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00414.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Collins JW, Keeney KM, Crepin VF, Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA, et al. (2014) Citrobacter rodentium: infection, inflammation and the microbiota. Nature reviews Microbiology 12: 612–623. 10.1038/nrmicro3315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nataro JP, Kaper JB (1998) Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clinical microbiology reviews 11: 142–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garmendia J, Frankel G, Crepin VF (2005) Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections: translocation, translocation, translocation. Infection and immunity 73: 2573–2585. 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2573-2585.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wan F, Weaver A, Gao X, Bern M, Hardwidge PR, et al. (2011) IKKbeta phosphorylation regulates RPS3 nuclear translocation and NF-kappaB function during infection with Escherichia coli strain O157:H7. Nature immunology 12: 335–343. 10.1038/ni.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Santos AS, Finlay BB (2015) Bringing down the host: enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli effector-mediated subversion of host innate immune pathways. Cellular microbiology 17: 318–332. 10.1111/cmi.12412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nougayrede JP, Fernandes PJ, Donnenberg MS (2003) Adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to host cells. Cellular microbiology 5: 359–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allaire JM, Crowley SM, Law HT, Chang SY, Ko HJ, et al. (2018) The Intestinal Epithelium: Central Coordinator of Mucosal Immunity. Trends in immunology 39: 677–696. 10.1016/j.it.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Torres AG, Zhou X, Kaper JB (2005) Adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains to epithelial cells. Infection and immunity 73: 18–29. 10.1128/IAI.73.1.18-29.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wong AR, Pearson JS, Bright MD, Munera D, Robinson KS, et al. (2011) Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: even more subversive elements. Molecular microbiology 80: 1420–1438. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07661.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stevens MP, Frankel GM (2014) The Locus of Enterocyte Effacement and Associated Virulence Factors of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Microbiology spectrum 2: EHEC-0007-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bhatt S, Egan M, Jenkins V, Muche S, El-Fenej J (2016) The Tip of the Iceberg: On the Roles of Regulatory Small RNAs in the Virulence of Enterohemorrhagic and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 6: 105 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zheng Y, Valdez PA, Danilenko DM, Hu Y, Sa SM, et al. (2008) Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nature medicine 14: 282–289. 10.1038/nm1720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pan HF, Zhao XF, Yuan H, Zhang WH, Li XP, et al. (2009) Decreased serum IL-22 levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 401: 179–180. 10.1016/j.cca.2008.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim CJ, Nazli A, Rojas OL, Chege D, Alidina Z, et al. (2012) A role for mucosal IL-22 production and Th22 cells in HIV-associated mucosal immunopathogenesis. Mucosal immunology 5: 670–680. 10.1038/mi.2012.72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yamazaki Y, Yamada M, Kawai T, Morio T, Onodera M, et al. (2014) Two novel gain-of-function mutations of STAT1 responsible for chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis disease: impaired production of IL-17A and IL-22, and the presence of anti-IL-17F autoantibody. Journal of immunology 193: 4880–4887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sabat R, Ouyang W, Wolk K (2014) Therapeutic opportunities of the IL-22-IL-22R1 system. Nature reviews Drug discovery 13: 21–38. 10.1038/nrd4176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cooper HS, Murthy SN, Shah RS, Sedergran DJ (1993) Clinicopathologic study of dextran sulfate sodium experimental murine colitis. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 69: 238–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ugalde-Silva P, Gonzalez-Lugo O, Navarro-Garcia F (2016) Tight Junction Disruption Induced by Type 3 Secretion System Effectors Injected by Enteropathogenic and Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 6: 87 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hodgson A, Wan F (2016) Interference with nuclear factor kappaB signaling pathway by pathogen-encoded proteases: global and selective inhibition. Molecular microbiology 99: 439–452. 10.1111/mmi.13245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guttman JA, Li Y, Wickham ME, Deng W, Vogl AW, et al. (2006) Attaching and effacing pathogen-induced tight junction disruption in vivo. Cellular microbiology 8: 634–645. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00656.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McNamara BP, Koutsouris A, O'Connell CB, Nougayrede JP, Donnenberg MS, et al. (2001) Translocated EspF protein from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli disrupts host intestinal barrier function. The Journal of clinical investigation 107: 621–629. 10.1172/JCI11138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Muza-Moons MM, Schneeberger EE, Hecht GA (2004) Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection leads to appearance of aberrant tight junctions strands in the lateral membrane of intestinal epithelial cells. Cellular microbiology 6: 783–793. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00404.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dean P, Kenny B (2004) Intestinal barrier dysfunction by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is mediated by two effector molecules and a bacterial surface protein. Molecular microbiology 54: 665–675. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04308.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tomson FL, Viswanathan VK, Kanack KJ, Kanteti RP, Straub KV, et al. (2005) Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli EspG disrupts microtubules and in conjunction with Orf3 enhances perturbation of the tight junction barrier. Molecular microbiology 56: 447–464. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04571.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Thanabalasuriar A, Koutsouris A, Weflen A, Mimee M, Hecht G, et al. (2010) The bacterial virulence factor NleA is required for the disruption of intestinal tight junctions by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cellular microbiology 12: 31–41. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01376.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garber JJ, Mallick EM, Scanlon KM, Turner JR, Donnenberg MS, et al. (2018) Attaching-and-Effacing Pathogens Exploit Junction Regulatory Activities of N-WASP and SNX9 to Disrupt the Intestinal Barrier. Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology 5: 273–288. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.11.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Weflen AW, Alto NM, Viswanathan VK, Hecht G (2010) E. coli secreted protein F promotes EPEC invasion of intestinal epithelial cells via an SNX9-dependent mechanism. Cellular microbiology 12: 919–929. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01440.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Peralta-Ramirez J, Hernandez JM, Manning-Cela R, Luna-Munoz J, Garcia-Tovar C, et al. (2008) EspF Interacts with nucleation-promoting factors to recruit junctional proteins into pedestals for pedestal maturation and disruption of paracellular permeability. Infection and immunity 76: 3854–3868. 10.1128/IAI.00072-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Blasche S, Arens S, Ceol A, Siszler G, Schmidt MA, et al. (2014) The EHEC-host interactome reveals novel targets for the translocated intimin receptor. Scientific reports 4: 7531 10.1038/srep07531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shifflett DE, Clayburgh DR, Koutsouris A, Turner JR, Hecht GA (2005) Enteropathogenic E. coli disrupts tight junction barrier function and structure in vivo. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 85: 1308–1324. 10.1038/labinvest.3700330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Thanabalasuriar A, Kim J, Gruenheid S (2013) The inhibition of COPII trafficking is important for intestinal epithelial tight junction disruption during enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Citrobacter rodentium infection. Microbes and infection 15: 738–744. 10.1016/j.micinf.2013.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Thanabalasuriar A, Bergeron J, Gillingham A, Mimee M, Thomassin JL, et al. (2012) Sec24 interaction is essential for localization and virulence-associated function of the bacterial effector protein NleA. Cellular microbiology 14: 1206–1218. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01789.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang Q, Li Q, Wang C, Liu X, Li N, et al. (2010) Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli changes distribution of occludin and ZO-1 in tight junction membrane microdomains in vivo. Microbial pathogenesis 48: 28–34. 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang X, Du Y, Hua Y, Fu M, Niu C, et al. (2017) The EspF N-Terminal of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL933w Imparts Stronger Toxicity Effects on HT-29 Cells than the C-Terminal. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 7: 410 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ritchie JM, Waldor MK (2005) The locus of enterocyte effacement-encoded effector proteins all promote enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli pathogenicity in infant rabbits. Infection and immunity 73: 1466–1474. 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1466-1474.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jang MS, Lee YM, Choi YL, Cho YS, Lee YC (2004) Isolation of Citrobacter sp. mutants defective in decolorization of brilliant green by transposon mutagenesis. Journal of microbiology 42: 139–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.McNamara BP, Donnenberg MS (1998) A novel proline-rich protein, EspF, is secreted from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli via the type III export pathway. FEMS microbiology letters 166: 71–78. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13185.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ma C, Wickham ME, Guttman JA, Deng W, Walker J, et al. (2006) Citrobacter rodentium infection causes both mitochondrial dysfunction and intestinal epithelial barrier disruption in vivo: role of mitochondrial associated protein (Map). Cellular microbiology 8: 1669–1686. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00741.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nava P, Kamekura R, Nusrat A (2013) Cleavage of transmembrane junction proteins and their role in regulating epithelial homeostasis. Tissue barriers 1: e24783 10.4161/tisb.24783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Flynn AN, Buret AG (2008) Tight junctional disruption and apoptosis in an in vitro model of Citrobacter rodentium infection. Microbial pathogenesis 45: 98–104. 10.1016/j.micpath.2007.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kang YJ, Otsuka M, van den Berg A, Hong L, Huang Z, et al. (2010) Epithelial p38alpha controls immune cell recruitment in the colonic mucosa. PLoS pathogens 6: e1000934 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Garcia-Hernandez V, Quiros M, Nusrat A (2017) Intestinal epithelial claudins: expression and regulation in homeostasis and inflammation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1397: 66–79. 10.1111/nyas.13360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nagai T, Abe A, Sasakawa C (2005) Targeting of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli EspF to host mitochondria is essential for bacterial pathogenesis: critical role of the 16th leucine residue in EspF. The Journal of biological chemistry 280: 2998–3011. 10.1074/jbc.M411550200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kamada N, Kim YG, Sham HP, Vallance BA, Puente JL, et al. (2012) Regulated virulence controls the ability of a pathogen to compete with the gut microbiota. Science 336: 1325–1329. 10.1126/science.1222195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chung L, Thiele Orberg E, Geis AL, Chan JL, Fu K, et al. (2018) Bacteroides fragilis Toxin Coordinates a Pro-carcinogenic Inflammatory Cascade via Targeting of Colonic Epithelial Cells. Cell host & microbe 23: 203–214 e205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Holmes A, Muhlen S, Roe AJ, Dean P (2010) The EspF effector, a bacterial pathogen's Swiss army knife. Infection and immunity 78: 4445–4453. 10.1128/IAI.00635-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Alto NM, Weflen AW, Rardin MJ, Yarar D, Lazar CS, et al. (2007) The type III effector EspF coordinates membrane trafficking by the spatiotemporal activation of two eukaryotic signaling pathways. The Journal of cell biology 178: 1265–1278. 10.1083/jcb.200705021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Singh AP, Sharma S, Pagarware K, Siraji RA, Ansari I, et al. (2018) Enteropathogenic E. coli effectors EspF and Map independently disrupt tight junctions through distinct mechanisms involving transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Scientific reports 8: 3719 10.1038/s41598-018-22017-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hodgson A, Wier EM, Fu K, Sun X, Yu H, et al. (2015) Metalloprotease NleC Suppresses Host NF-kappaB/Inflammatory Responses by Cleaving p65 and Interfering with the p65/RPS3 Interaction. PLoS pathogens 11: e1004705 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hardwidge PR, Deng W, Vallance BA, Rodriguez-Escudero I, Cid VJ, et al. (2005) Modulation of host cytoskeleton function by the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Citrobacter rodentium effector protein EspG. Infection and immunity 73: 2586–2594. 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2586-2594.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Edwards RA, Keller LH, Schifferli DM (1998) Improved allelic exchange vectors and their use to analyze 987P fimbria gene expression. Gene 207: 149–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gibson DL, Ma C, Bergstrom KS, Huang JT, Man C, et al. (2008) MyD88 signalling plays a critical role in host defence by controlling pathogen burden and promoting epithelial cell homeostasis during Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis. Cellular microbiology 10: 618–631. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01071.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fu K, Sun X, Wier EM, Hodgson A, Liu Y, et al. (2016) Sam68/KHDRBS1 is critical for colon tumorigenesis by regulating genotoxic stress-induced NF-kappaB activation. eLife 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.