Abstract
We report the synthesis of amphiphilic polymers featuring lipophilic stearyl chains and hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) polymers that are connected through singlet oxygen-cleavable alkoxyanthracene linkers. These amphiphilic polymers assembled in water to form micelles with diameters of ~20 nm. Reaction of the alkoxyanthracene linkers with light and O2 cleaved the ether C-O bonds, resulting in formation of the corresponding 9,10-anthraquinone derivatives and concomitant disruption of the micelles. These micelles were loaded with the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin, which was efficiently released upon photo-oxidation. The drug-loaded reactive micelles were effective at killing cancer cells in vitro upon irradiation at 365 nm, functioning through both doxorubicin release and photodynamic mechanisms.
Keywords: Self-assembly, light-responsive materials, amphiphilic polymers, drug delivery, doxorubicin
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Materials that degrade upon application of specific chemical or physical triggers have potential for on-demand delivery,1 and other applications.2,3 A range of responsive linkers cleave upon application of a specific endogenous stimulus, such as disulfides for chemical reduction4 or acetals for hydrolytic degradation.5 Photodegradable materials provide an external stimulus for activation, harnessing the unique advantages of light, including spatiotemporal precision and the ability to penetrate through barriers impermeable to traditional chemical reagents. Photocleavable groups are common components of photodegradable macromolecular architectures,6,7 such as UV-disruptable block copolymer micelles that release Nile Red upon irradiation.8 Furthermore, a number of approaches are applicable to drug delivery systems that respond to visible or NIR light,9 such as two-photon absorption,10,11 photothermal heating12,13,14 and upconverting nanoparticles.15,16,17,18,19
As an alternative, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) singlet oxygen (1O2) is both readily generated photochemically and can cleave specific chemical bonds. 1O2 engages in [2+2] cycloadditions and ene reactions, and can also act as a dienophile, oxidizing anthracenes and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to endoperoxides through [4+2] cycloaddition reactions.20,21,22 The cytotoxic nature of 1O2 makes it important in photodynamic therapy, a treatment that uses a photosensitizer to produce ROS upon irradiation to destroy cancer cells.23 The ubiquity and ease of generation of 1O2 has led to the concept of 1O2 cleaving chemical bonds selectively. Beyond the initially reported electron-rich alkenes, other moieties have emerged that undergo bond cleavage upon reaction with 1O2, such as aminoacrylates,24,25,26,27,28 alkoxyanthracenes,29,30,31,32,33,34,35 and thioketals.36,37 These classes of 1O2-cleavable groups have been integrated into a range of degradable materials, including block copolymer micelles,38,39 nanoparticles,40 nanorods,41 and vesicles.42 Two principal methods exist that harness 1O2-responsive linkers for applications in drug delivery: i) materials in which a prodrug is covalently linked through a 1O2-clevable linker,43 and ii) materials in which the drug is non-covalently trapped in a 1O2-degradable carrier.39
Cleavage of linkages between hydrophobic and hydrophilic segments of amphiphiles provides an effective strategy to disrupt micelles.39 Herein we report 1O2-cleavable amphiphiles featuring alkoxyanthracene derivatives that bridge lipophilic and hydrophilic segments of polymers that assemble into photooxidatively degradable micelles. We prepared two amphiphilic polymers (9,10-C18PEG and 3,9-C18PEG), each consisting of a lipophilic stearyl chain and a hydrophilic polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer connected through a 1O2-cleavable linker (Figure 1). We demonstrate that photochemical oxidation of these polymers results in micellar disruption due to the oxidation and subsequent bond cleavage of the linker between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic segments of the polymers, yielding responsive assemblies. These polymers provided a photochemically-activated therapeutic platform that combines chemotherapeutic payload release with photodynamic therapy.
Figure 1.

a) Photooxidation and cleavage reaction of the amphiphilic polymer 9,10-C18PEG. b) Schematic depiction of micelle disruption upon anthracene photooxidation. c) Intracellular DOX release.
Experimental Section
General Information.
1H and 13C NMR spectra were acquired with a Bruker AVANCEIII 500 MHz NMR, in deuterated solvent at room temperature. Chemical shifts are given in parts per million (ppm). All spectra were processed with Topspin 2.1 (Bruker Biospin) and further visualized with MestreNova, version 12 (Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain).
All reactions were monitored using silica gel 60 F254 analytical TLC plates with UV detection (λ = 254 nm and 365 nm). Silica gel (60 Å, 40–63 μm) was used as the stationary phase for column chromatography. The spectrophotometric measurements of compounds were carried out in solvents of spectrophotometric quality. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded using a Varian Cary-100 spectrophotometer in double beam mode. Irradiation experiments were performed with a 200 W Hg/Xe lamp (Newport-Oriel) equipped with a water filter, manual shutter, focusing lens, and the appropriate wavelength selecting filters. For irradiation at 365 nm, a combination of a 295 nm long-pass filter and a 365 nm band-pass filter was used, giving an average power density of 38 mW/cm2. For longer wavelength irradiations at λ > 630 nm, a 630 nm long-pass filter was used, giving an average power density of 50 mW/cm2. For irradiation at λ > 495 nm, two 495 nm long-pass filters were used, giving an average power density of 71 mW/cm2.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were performed on a Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instrument Ltd., U.K.) equipped with a He−Ne laser operating at 633 nm at 25 °C. Samples were prepared in pure water and filtered through 0.2 μ m PTFE syringe filters before measurements. Mass spectrometry of polymers was performed using a Bruker Microflex MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer.
High-resolution mass spectral (HRMS) analyses of new compounds were performed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology mass spectrometry facility using electrospray ionization in positive mode.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).
Freshly prepared sample solution was drop-cast onto a TEM grid (carbon film, 400 mesh copper, Electron Microscopy Sciences), and the sample was allowed to dry at room temperature overnight. Negative staining was employed to enhance the imaging contrast.44 2% uranyl acetate solution was dropped on the sample for 30 seconds, following by drying using a filter paper. The structural of samples were inspected using a JEOL 2000FX TEM with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
Chemicals.
All starting materials and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, TCI Chemicals, or Fisher Scientific and, unless otherwise specified, were used without further purification. Deuterated solvents were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. mPEG-Amine and mPEG-OC18 (MW 2000 Da) were purchased from Creative PEGWorks. Doxorubicin, hydrochloride salt was purchased from LC Laboratories. 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene,45 9-methoxyanthracene,46 cis-1,2-diphenyldithioethene47 were synthesized according to literature procedures.
Results and Discussion
A number of peroxides that result from cycloaddition of 1O2 are reported to cleave bonds in the original reactant; such moieties have the potential to be 1O2-cleavable groups in polymer materials. To inform designs of our 1O2-cleavable amphiphiles, we first compared the reactivities of a range of reported 1O2-cleavable groups by monitoring their disappearance in CH2Cl2 by UV-vis spectrophotometry upon irradiation of the sensitizer methylene blue (Figure 2). We analyzed the kinetics of disappearance using a pseudo first-order kinetic model for the disappearance of 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene, 9-methoxyanthracene, cis-1,2-diphenyldithioethene, and ethyl β -dimethylamino acrylate, all relative to a standard for chemical reactions with 1O2, 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA). The Supporting Information contains the spectroscopic data for each kinetic trace (Figure S11). While the dithioethene and aminoacrylate each reacted with half the rate of DPA, the electron rich methoxyanthracenes reacted faster than DPA, with 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene reacting four times faster than 9-methoxyanthracene. These observations agree with the known trend that more electron rich, readily oxidized acenes react faster with 1O2 than less electron-rich acenes.
Figure 2.

Pseudo-first-order kinetics of reaction of four reported 1O2-cleavable groups upon irradiation of methylene blue in CH2Cl2; krel = 1 for 9,10-diphenylanthracene.
To support the hypothesis that 1O2 is a key reactive oxygen species in these reactions of alkoxyacenes, we analyzed the products of photochemical oxidation of 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene under several conditions (See Figures S38–S42). Selective irradiation of methylene blue with λ > 600 nm in the presence of 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene in acetone-d6 yielded the corresponding 9,10-endoperoxide, as would be expected upon cycloaddition with 1O2 with no discernable byproducts by NMR spectroscopy. Especially key to making this assignment was the characteristic 13C NMR signal for the bridgehead protons at 102.9 ppm. Similarly, direct irradiation of 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene at 365 nm yielded identical 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra as selective irradiation of methylene blue (Figure S38–S42). We therefore conclude that irradiation of 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene produces 1O2, which then undergoes [4+2] cycloaddition to yield the 9,10-endoperoxide.
We chose the two most reactive alkoxyanthracene derivatives as linking moieties in cleavable amphiphiles that contain PEG. In addition to being hydrophilic, PEG has the advantages of biocompatibility and resistance to fouling,48,49,50 as well the commercial availability of a variety of reactive derivatives. Scheme 1 summarizes our successful approach for synthesizing the target amphiphiles. The preparation of the 9,10-dialkoxyanthracene-linked amphiphile began with reductive alkylation of 9,10-anthraquinone. A mixture of tert-butylbromoacetate and 1-bromooctadecane gave the desired unsymmetric product 1, followed deprotection with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to yield carboxylic acid 2.51 Amidation of 2 with amine-functionalized PEG (2 kDa) under standard conditions led to the cleavable amphiphile 9,10-C18PEG. Following a similar strategy, reduction of 2-octadecyloxyanthraquinone52 gave the 3-alkoxy-9-anthrone regioisomer 3 selectively. Alkylation of 3 with tert-butylbromoacetate yielded the desired O-alkylated compound 4. After deprotection with TFA, EDC-promoted amidation with methoxy PEG amine (2 kDa) again yielded target amphiphilic polymer 3,9-C18PEG.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of the amphiphilic polymers 9,10-C18PEG and 3,9-C18PEG, and chemical structure of commercially available, unreactive amphiphile C18PEG. In each case, the molecular weight of PEG was 2 kDa.
Amphiphiles 9,10-C18PEG and 3,9-C18PEG appeared soluble in water by visual inspection, forming optically clear, foamy solutions upon gentle shaking and filtration through 0.2 μ m PTFE filters. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) of these samples revealed the presence of particles with average hydrodynamic diameters of ~20 nm for both polymers, which was corroborated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Figure 3 and Figure S24–S28). While 9,10-C18PEG forms only spherical micelles (Figure S26), 3,9-C18PEG forms mixtures of spherical and rod-like micelles (Figure S27 and S28), with a larger proportion of rod-like micelles at higher amphiphile concentrations. Previous literature indicates that spherical micelles aggregating at increasing concentration of non-ionic PEG-based surfactants causes this sphere-to-rod transition.53 The sizes of these micelles were generally smaller than micelles prepared from block copolymers,38,39 and comparable to previously reported micelles comprising an n-C18H37 hydrophobic segment and PEG hydrophilic segment,54 indicating that the anthracene linkers do not perturb micellization. Changes in the absorbance of eosin Y as a function of amphiphile concentration enabled estimation of the critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) of these polymers,55 which we determined to be 64 μM (0.16 mg/mL) for 9,10-C18PEG and 74 μM (0.18 mg/mL) for 3,9-C18PEG (Figure 4). These values are largely indistinguishable to the CMC of a commercially available analog (C18PEG) that does not include any anthracenes (89 μM, Figure S13).
Figure 3.

Left: Distribution of hydrodynamic diameters of 9,10-C18PEG and 3,9-C18PEG micelles in water (1.0 mg/mL), determined by dynamic light scattering. Right: Negative stain TEM images of 9,10-C18PEG and 3,9-C18PEG micelles (1.0 mg/mL and 0.5 mg/mL respectively).
Figure 4.
Sequences of spectra recorded over the course of titrating a 7.0 μM solution of eosin Y with a solution of 9,10-C18PEG (top) or 3,9-C18PEG (bottom): spectrum of eosin Y prior to the addition (thick black line); spectrum after the addition of polymer (thick blue line). The inset shows titration profiles at 542 nm and determination of CMCs.
Upon irradiation at 365 nm, the decomposition of the linkers triggered the disruption of the micelles. We monitored photochemical conversion of these samples by both UV/vis spectrophotometry and DLS in deionized water. The characteristic absorbance bands of the anthracene chromophores decreased upon irradiation, with the anthracene in 9,10-C18PEG reacting ~4-fold faster than that of 3,9-C18PEG (Figure S14 and S18), consistent with our earlier kinetics experiments in organic solvent. In addition, the optically transparent samples developed visible precipitate after photo-oxidation, which we ascribe to aggregates of hydrophobic photoproducts that contain anthraquinones, and in the case of 9,10-C18PEG, stearyl alcohol. The large and polydisperse nature of these aggregates made analysis of these “as-irradiated” samples by DLS impossible. After filtration, however, analysis of these samples by DLS showed partial photo-induced transformation of these small micelles into larger particles of average diameter between 100–200 nm, with the ~20 nm-diameter micelles of 9,10-C18PEG disappearing completely after one hour, while micelles of 3,9-C18PEG were only partially consumed after two hours (Figure S15 and S19).
To establish the products of UV irradiation of these anthracene-containing amphiphiles when they are assembled into micelles, we irradiated micellar aqueous solutions of 9,10-C18PEG or 3,9-C18PEG with λ = 365 nm, followed by lyophilization and 1H NMR analysis of the samples in CDCl3, which dissolves all photoproducts. Inspection of the aromatic region of the spectra revealed 9,10-anthraquinone (Figure 5b) as the primary aromatic product of the irradiation of 9,10-C18PEG (Figure 5a), and 2-octadecyloxyanthraquinone (Figure 5d) as the primary aromatic product of the irradiation of 3,9-C18PEG (Figure 5c). These anthraquinone products are consistent with the proposed mechanism of photooxidation and cleavage of alkoxyacenes reported in the literature.29,56 We therefore conclude that the bonds between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic segments of these amphiphiles cleave upon irradiation due to exposure to 1O2, which leads to micelle disruption.
Figure 5.
Aromatic region of 1H NMR spectra in CDCl3 of a) 9,10-C18PEG before and b) after one hour UV irradiation and c) 3,9-C18PEG before and d) after 12 hours UV irradiation.
In an initial demonstration of phototriggered release, we loaded micelles comprising 9,10-C18PEG, 3,9-C18PEG, or C18PEG with the guest doxorubicin (DOX), a hydrophobic chemotherapeutic drug.57,58,59 The release of DOX from the solubilizing environment of the micelle was monitored by the decrease of intensity of the DOX band in the UV-vis spectra of an aqueous solution of micelles loaded with solubilized DOX after irradiation ( λ = 365 nm), and filtration with a 0.2 µm PTFE syringe filter to remove the de-solubilized DOX that aggregates upon micelle disruption. We ascribe the faster rate of DOX removal from 9,10-C18PEG micelles compared to 3,9-C18PEG and C18PEG micelles (Figure 6 and Figure S33–S35) to faster decomposition of the 9,10-dialkoxy cleavable linkers.
Figure 6.

Release of DOX from micelles in water upon exposure to light (λ = 365 nm) and in the dark at room temperature. The amount of DOX removed from the solubilizing environment of the micellar cores upon irradiation of 9,10-C18PEG micelles is greater than the amount released from 3,9-C18PEG and C18PEG micelles. Error bars show standard errors of three replicates.
A potential advantage of 1O2-responsive materials is the range of sensitizers that can produce 1O2 upon irradiation with visible or near-infrared light. We used eosin Y as a photosensitizer, as Methylene Blue gave rise to larger aggregates according to DLS measurements, while Rose Bengal exhibited poor photostability. Irradiation of a solution containing both eosin Y and 9,10-C18PEG at λ > 495 nm yielded irreversible oxidation of the anthracene linker (Figure S16). DLS analysis after filtration did reveal partial transformation of the micelles into larger particles (Figure S17), but micelles were not completely consumed after one-hour irradiation as observed during exposure to UV light. Irradiation at λ > 495 nm in the absence of sensitizer yielded no anthracene oxidation (Figure S22). In addition, removal of O2 from the micellar suspension slowed reaction of anthracene in 9,10-C18PEG dramatically, achieving only 20–25% conversion after 60 minutes (Figure S23); similar conversion in aerated water required less than 3 minutes (Figure S16).
To evaluate their therapeutic potential in vitro, we compared the extent to which these micelles reduced the viability of HeLa cells (Figure 7) when they were: i) either devoid of cargo or loaded with DOX, and ii) either kept in the dark or irradiated at 365 nm. Confocal microscopy of DOX-loaded micelles, using the intrinsic fluorescence of DOX as an imaging agent, confirmed cellular uptake of DOX loaded micelles into the cytosol of HeLa cells (Figure S37). Micelles comprising the control amphiphile C18PEG, and therefore lacking any moiety that absorbs 365 nm showed minimal toxicity, regardless of whether they were irradiated, loaded with DOX, or both. In contrast, irradiation of micelles comprising either 9,10-C18PEG or 3,9-C18PEG, but not loaded with DOX, decreased cell viability to 44–56%, while identical samples kept in the dark did not show increased toxicity relative to the control amphiphile C18PEG. We attribute this photoinduced cytotoxicity in the absence of DOX to 1O2, and perhaps other ROS, formed upon direct irradiation of alkoxyacene chromophores. When loaded with DOX and irradiated with light, micelles comprising 9,10-C18PEG showed even greater toxicity by reducing cell viability to 27±3%, while the same sample in the absence of light showed minimal toxicity. We ascribe the increased phototoxicity of 9,10-C18PEG micelles compared to 3,9-C18PEG micelles to faster decomposition of the 9,10-dialkoxy cleavable linkers, yielding faster release of the DOX cargo, in accordance with the model release experiments (Figure 6). These results are consistent with cooperative photoinduced cytotoxicity of drug-loaded 9,10-C18PEG micelles that combine the traditional photodynamic effect of ROS production with photo-triggered release of DOX. The estimated concentration of DOX used for in vitro delivery experiments (0.18 μM) is lower than the IC50 (50% of growth inhibition) that we measured for doxorubicin acting on HeLa cells (1.3 μM), which is in accordance with the reported IC50 (1–5 μM),60,61 further suggesting the combination of ROS and released DOX as responsible for the increased cytotoxicity.
Figure 7.

Cell viability of HeLa cells upon exposure to micelles that are either: i) loaded with DOX (YES) or not loaded (No), and ii) irradiated at 365 nm in the presence of the cells (Light) or not irradiated (Dark). Error bars show standard deviations of four replicates. The irradiation time for all “light” experiments was 60 minutes.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated the rational design of nanometric, photo-oxidatively degradable micelles containing alkoxyanthracene-based singlet oxygen cleavable groups, including a 9-alkoxy-10-hydroanthracene linker. The products of irradiation of these micelles in aqueous solution are consistent with reaction with singlet oxygen to form endoperoxides, followed by bond cleavage to yield the corresponding quinones. The reactivity of the anthracene moieties controls the kinetics of micelle degradation, the rate of cargo release, and the observed photoinduced cytotoxicity. From a materials design perspective, our results provide a flexible platform for the discovery of nanoscale delivery vehicles that exhibit enhanced photodynamic therapy—the combination of photodynamic therapy with photo-responsive materials that can release a trapped drug—while laying the groundwork for potential paths forward for harnessing visible or NIR light through either the integration of a separate sensitizer or modifications of alkoxyacenes to absorb longer wavelengths. More fundamentally, this work also highlights the value of continuously improving our understanding of chemical reactivity for the rational design of responsive nanomaterials.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Funding from the NIH (EB022207) supported the structure-property studies and model release experiments, while funding from the NSF (CHE-1609146, to ST) and the NIH (EB02264, to VR) supported the fluorescence microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and in vitro experiments. We thank James Chambers (Light Microscopy Facility at UMass Amherst) for assistance with confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information.
The following files are available free of charge.
1H and 13C NMR spectra, MALDI-TOF mass spectra, UV-Vis measurements, Irradiation experiments, Control experiments, DOX loading and release experiments, Cell viability, Cellular uptake, in vitro irradiation experiments (PDF)
REFERENCES
- (1).Mura S; Nicolas J; Couvreur P Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery. Nat. Mater 2013, 12 (11), 991–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Wei M; Gao Y; Li X; Serpe MJ Stimuli-Responsive Polymers and Their Applications. Polym Chem 2017, 8 (1), 127–143. [Google Scholar]
- (3).Stuart MAC; Huck WTS; Genzer J; Müller M; Ober C; Stamm M; Sukhorukov GB; Szleifer I; Tsukruk VV; Urban M; Winnik F; Zauscher S; Luzinov I; Minko S Emerging Applications of Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Materials. Nat. Mater 2010, 9 (2), 101–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Li L; Feng W; Welle A; Levkin PA UV-Induced Disulfide Formation and Reduction for Dynamic Photopatterning. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55 (44), 13765–13769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Liu B; Thayumanavan S Substituent Effects on the pH Sensitivity of Acetals and Ketals and Their Correlation with Encapsulation Stability in Polymeric Nanogels. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (6), 2306–2317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Yan B; Boyer J-C; Branda NR; Zhao Y Near-Infrared Light-Triggered Dissociation of Block Copolymer Micelles Using Upconverting Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133 (49), 19714–19717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Gao Y; Qiu H; Zhou H; Li X; Harniman R; Winnik MA; Manners I Crystallization-Driven Solution Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers with a Photocleavable Junction. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137 (6), 2203–2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Jiang J; Tong X; Morris D; Zhao Y Toward Photocontrolled Release Using Light-Dissociable Block Copolymer Micelles. Macromolecules 2006, 39 (13), 4633–4640. [Google Scholar]
- (9).Karimi M; Sahandi Zangabad P; Baghaee-Ravari S; Ghazadeh M; Mirshekari H; Hamblin MR Smart Nanostructures for Cargo Delivery: Uncaging and Activating by Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (13), 4584–4610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Croissant J; Maynadier M; Gallud A; Peindy N’Dongo H; Nyalosaso JL; Derrien G; Charnay C; Durand J-O; Raehm L; Serein-Spirau F; Cheminet N; Jarrosson T; Mongin O; Blanchard‐Desce M; Gary‐Bobo M; Garcia M; Lu J; Tamanoi F; Tarn D; Guardado‐Alvarez TM; Zink JI Two-Photon-Triggered Drug Delivery in Cancer Cells Using Nanoimpellers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52 (51), 13813–13817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Croissant J; Chaix A; Mongin O; Wang M; Clément S; Raehm L; Durand J-O; Hugues V; Blanchard-Desce M; Maynadier M; Gallud A; Gary‐Bobo M; Garcia M; Lu J; Tamanoi F; Ferris DP; Tarn D; Zink JI Two-Photon-Triggered Drug Delivery via Fluorescent Nanovalves. Small 2014, 10 (9), 1752–1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Yin W; Yan L; Yu J; Tian G; Zhou L; Zheng X; Zhang X; Yong Y; Li J; Gu Z; Zhao Y High-Throughput Synthesis of Single-Layer MoS 2 Nanosheets as a Near-Infrared Photothermal-Triggered Drug Delivery for Effective Cancer Therapy. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (7), 6922–6933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Zhang P; Wang Y; Lian J; Shen Q; Wang C; Ma B; Zhang Y; Xu T; Li J; Shao Y; Xu F; Zhu J-J Engineering the Surface of Smart Nanocarriers Using a pH-/Thermal-/GSH-Responsive Polymer Zipper for Precise Tumor Targeting Therapy In Vivo. Adv. Mater 2017, 1702311. [DOI] [PubMed]
- (14).Dai Y; Sun H; Pal S; Zhang Y; Park S; Kabb CP; Wei WD; Sumerlin BS Near-IR-Induced Dissociation of Thermally-Sensitive Star Polymers. Chem. Sci 2017, 8 (3), 1815–1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Chen G; Qiu H; Prasad PN; Chen X Upconversion Nanoparticles: Design, Nanochemistry, and Applications in Theranostics. Chem. Rev 2014, 114 (10), 5161–5214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Chien Y-H; Chou Y-L; Wang S-W; Hung S-T; Liau M-C; Chao Y-J; Su C-H; Yeh C-S Near-Infrared Light Photocontrolled Targeting, Bioimaging, and Chemotherapy with Caged Upconversion Nanoparticles in Vitro and in Vivo. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (10), 8516–8528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Liu J; Bu W; Pan L; Shi J NIR-Triggered Anticancer Drug Delivery by Upconverting Nanoparticles with Integrated Azobenzene-Modified Mesoporous Silica. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52 (16), 4375–4379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Chen Z; Sun W; Butt H-J; Wu S Upconverting-Nanoparticle-Assisted Photochemistry Induced by Low-Intensity Near-Infrared Light: How Low Can We Go? Chem. - Eur. J 2015, 21 (25), 9165–9170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Wu S; Blinco JP; Barner-Kowollik C Near-Infrared Photoinduced Reactions Assisted by Upconverting Nanoparticles. Chem. - Eur. J 2017, 23 (35), 8325–8332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Ghogare AA; Greer A Using Singlet Oxygen to Synthesize Natural Products and Drugs. Chem. Rev 2016, 116 (17), 9994–10034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Aubry J-M; Pierlot C; Rigaudy J; Schmidt R Reversible Binding of Oxygen to Aromatic Compounds. Acc. Chem. Res 2003, 36 (9), 668–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Wasserman HH; DeSimone RW; Chia KRX; Banwell MG Singlet Oxygen. In Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- (23).Dolmans DEJGJ; Fukumura D; Jain RK TIMELINE: Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3 (5), 380–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Bio M; Nkepang G; You Y Click and Photo-Unclick Chemistry of Aminoacrylate for Visible Light-Triggered Drug Release. Chem. Commun 2012, 48 (52), 6517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Thapa P; Li M; Bio M; Rajaputra P; Nkepang G; Sun Y; Woo S; You Y Far-Red Light-Activatable Prodrug of Paclitaxel for the Combined Effects of Photodynamic Therapy and Site-Specific Paclitaxel Chemotherapy. J. Med. Chem 2016, 59 (7), 3204–3214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Nkepang G; Bio M; Rajaputra P; Awuah SG; You Y Folate Receptor-Mediated Enhanced and Specific Delivery of Far-Red Light-Activatable Prodrugs of Combretastatin A-4 to FR-Positive Tumor. Bioconjug. Chem 2014, 25 (12), 2175–2188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Yuan Y; Zhang C-J; Xu S; Liu B A Self-Reporting AIE Probe with a Built-in Singlet Oxygen Sensor for Targeted Photodynamic Ablation of Cancer Cells. Chem Sci 2016, 7 (3), 1862–1866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Martínez-Carmona M; Lozano D; Baeza A; Colilla M; Vallet-Regí M A Novel Visible Light Responsive Nanosystem for Cancer Treatment. Nanoscale 2017, 9 (41), 15967–15973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Arian D; Kovbasyuk L; Mokhir A 1,9-Dialkoxyanthracene as a 1O2-Sensitive Linker. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133 (11), 3972–3980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Meyer A; Mokhir A RNA Interference Controlled by Light of Variable Wavelength. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53 (47), 12840–12843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Meyer A; Schikora M; Mokhir A Red Light-Controlled Polymerase Chain Reaction. Chem Commun 2015, 51 (68), 13324–13326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Meyer A; Schikora M; Starkuviene V; Mokhir A Red Light Activated “caged” Reagents for microRNA Research. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2016, 15 (9), 1120–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Pieper H; Chercheja S; Eigler S; Halbig CE; Filipovic MR; Mokhir A Endoperoxides Revealed as Origin of the Toxicity of Graphene Oxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55 (1), 405–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Qian T; Chen F; Chen Y; Wang Y-X; Hu W Photolysis of Polymeric Self-Assembly Controlled by Donor–acceptor Interaction. Chem Commun 2017, 53 (86), 11822–11825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Al-Rehili S; Fhayli K; Hammami MA; Moosa B; Patil S; Zhang D; Alharbi O; Hedhili MN; Möhwald H; Khashab NM Anisotropic Self-Assembly of Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Microtoroids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139 (30), 10232–10238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Lamb BM; Barbas CF III Selective Arylthiolane Deprotection by Singlet Oxygen: A Promising Tool for Sensors and Prodrugs. Chem Commun 2015, 51 (15), 3196–3199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Cao Z; Ma Y; Sun C; Lu Z; Yao Z; Wang J; Li D; Yuan Y; Yang X ROS-Sensitive Polymeric Nanocarriers with Red Light-Activated Size Shrinkage for Remotely Controlled Drug Release. Chem. Mater 2018, 30 (2), 517–525. [Google Scholar]
- (38).Yan Q; Hu J; Zhou R; Ju Y; Yin Y; Yuan J Visible Light-Responsive Micelles Formed from Dialkoxyanthracene-Containing Block Copolymers. Chem. Commun 2012, 48 (13), 1913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Saravanakumar G; Lee J; Kim J; Kim WJ Visible Light-Induced Singlet Oxygen-Mediated Intracellular Disassembly of Polymeric Micelles Co-Loaded with a Photosensitizer and an Anticancer Drug for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy. Chem Commun 2015, 51 (49), 9995–9998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Lee J; Park J; Singha K; Kim WJ Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Facilitated Drug Release through Cascade Photosensitizer Activation and Cleavage of Singlet Oxygen Sensitive Linker. Chem. Commun 2013, 49 (15), 1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Yang G; Sun X; Liu J; Feng L; Liu Z Light-Responsive, Singlet-Oxygen-Triggered On-Demand Drug Release from Photosensitizer-Doped Mesoporous Silica Nanorods for Cancer Combination Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater 2016, 26 (26), 4722–4732. [Google Scholar]
- (42).Li J; Wei K; Zuo S; Xu Y; Zha Z; Ke W; Chen H; Ge Z Light-Triggered Clustered Vesicles with Self-Supplied Oxygen and Tissue Penetrability for Photodynamic Therapy against Hypoxic Tumor. Adv. Funct. Mater 2017, 27 (33), 1702108. [Google Scholar]
- (43).Jiang MY; Dolphin D Site-Specific Prodrug Release Using Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130 (13), 4236–4237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Schuch H; Klingler J; Rossmanith P; Frechen T; Gerst M; Feldthusen J; Müller AHE Characterization of Micelles of Polyisobutylene-b lock -Poly(methacrylic Acid) in Aqueous Medium. Macromolecules 2000, 33 (5), 1734–1740. [Google Scholar]
- (45).Seitz U; Daub J Phasen-Transfer-Katalyse Unter Reduzierenden Bedingungen: Hydrochinon-Dialkylether Aus Chinonen. Synthesis 1986, 1986 (08), 686–689. [Google Scholar]
- (46).Hirao Y; Saito T; Kurata H; Kubo T Isolation of a Hydrogen-Bonded Complex Based on the Anthranol/Anthroxyl Pair: Formation of a Hydrogen-Atom Self-Exchange System. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54 (8), 2402–2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Gómez C; Maciá B; Yus M DTBB-Catalysed Lithiation of 1,2-Bis(phenylsulfanyl)ethene: Does 1-Lithio-2-Phenylsulfanylethene Really Exist? Tetrahedron 2005, 61 (39), 9325–9330. [Google Scholar]
- (48).Gravel E; Ogier J; Arnauld T; Mackiewicz N; Ducongé F; Doris E Drug Delivery and Imaging with Polydiacetylene Micelles. Chem. - Eur. J 2012, 18 (2), 400–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Zhu S; Lansakara-P. DSP; Li X; Cui Z Lysosomal Delivery of a Lipophilic Gemcitabine Prodrug Using Novel Acid-Sensitive Micelles Improved Its Antitumor Activity. Bioconjug. Chem 2012, 23 (5), 966–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Herzberger J; Fischer K; Leibig D; Bros M; Thiermann R; Frey H Oxidation-Responsive and “Clickable” Poly(ethylene Glycol) via Copolymerization of 2-(Methylthio)ethyl Glycidyl Ether. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138 (29), 9212–9223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).König SG; Mokhir A “Caged” Peptide Nucleic Acids Activated by Red Light in a Singlet Oxygen Mediated Process. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2013, 23 (24), 6544–6548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Tamaki Y; Muto K; Miyamura K Odd–Even Effect in the Surface Structure of Alkyloxy-Substituted Anthraquinone on HOPG Observed by Scanning Tunneling Microscope. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 2013, 86 (3), 354–362. [Google Scholar]
- (53).Velinova M; Sengupta D; Tadjer AV; Marrink S-J Sphere-to-Rod Transitions of Nonionic Surfactant Micelles in Aqueous Solution Modeled by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Langmuir 2011, 27 (23), 14071–14077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Anilkumar P; Gravel E; Theodorou I; Gombert K; Thézé B; Ducongé F; Doris E Nanometric Micelles with Photo-Triggered Cytotoxicity. Adv. Funct. Mater 2014, 24 (33), 5246–5252. [Google Scholar]
- (55).Patist A; Bhagwat SS; Penfield KW; Aikens P; Shah DO On the Measurement of Critical Micelle Concentrations of Pure and Technical-Grade Nonionic Surfactants. J. Surfactants Deterg 2000, 3 (1), 53–58. [Google Scholar]
- (56).Bauch M; Klaper M; Linker T Intermediates in the Cleavage of Endoperoxides: Reactive Intermediates. J. Phys. Org. Chem 2017, 30 (4), e3607. [Google Scholar]
- (57).Gottlieb JA; Baker LH; Quagliana JM; Luce JK; Whitecar JP; Sinkovics JG; Rivkin SE; Brownlee R; Frei E Chemotherapy of Sarcomas with a Combination of Adriamycin and Dimethyl Triazeno Imidazole Carboxamide. Cancer 1972, 30 (6), 1632–1638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).O’Bryan RM; Baker LH; Gottlieb JE; Rivkin SE; Balcerzak SP; Grumet GN; Salmon SE; Moon TE; Hoogstraten B Dose Response Evaluation of Adriamycin in Human Neoplasia. Cancer 1977, 39 (5), 1940–1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Ratan R; Patel SR Chemotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Chemotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Cancer 2016, 122 (19), 2952–2960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Orzechowska E; Girstun A; Staron K; Trzcinska-Danielewicz J Synergy of BID with Doxorubicin in the Killing of Cancer Cells. Oncol. Rep 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- (61).Huang Y; Yang T; Zhang W; Lu Y; Ye P; Yang G; Li B; Qi S; Liu Y; He X; Lee RJ; Xu C; Xiang G A Novel Hydrolysis-Resistant Lipophilic Folate Derivative Enables Stable Delivery of Targeted Liposomes in Vivo. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2014, 4581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



