Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Jul 11;8(28):e00564-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00564-19

Draft Genomic Sequences of Campylobacter coli Isolates from Chicken Carcasses

Aixia Xu a, Aisha Abdul-Wakeel a, Nereus W Gunther IV a, Christopher Sommers a,
Editor: David A Baltrusb
PMCID: PMC6624768  PMID: 31296685

Campylobacter bacteria are one of the leading causes of bacterial foodborne illnesses in the United States. Here, we report the draft genomic sequences of eight Campylobacter coli isolates from chicken carcasses, including virulence factors and antibiotic resistance.

ABSTRACT

Campylobacter bacteria are one of the leading causes of bacterial foodborne illnesses in the United States. Here, we report the draft genomic sequences of eight Campylobacter coli isolates from chicken carcasses, including virulence factors and antibiotic resistance.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Campylobacter bacteria cause a large amount of human disease annually in the United States and are leading causative agents in the 3.6 million bacterial foodborne pathogen illnesses reported annually (1). The consumption of poultry meat contaminated by Campylobacter is associated with an estimated 608,231 illnesses, 6,091 hospitalizations, 55 deaths, and a $1,257 million cost of illness annually, which is the top disease burden among 50 pathogen-food combinations (2). Poultry meat can be contaminated by Campylobacter during slaughter and carcass processing (3). A better understanding of the mechanisms of survival and infection of Campylobacter, including virulence and resistance factors, is needed to develop effective control technologies (4). Toward this end, eight low-passage-number Campylobacter coli isolates recovered from chicken carcasses were subjected to genomic sequencing (5, 6).

Frozen (−80°C) cultures were streaked directly onto Brucella agar plates (Becton, Dickinson, Sparks, MD) and incubated for ∼16 h at 42°C in a microaerobic (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2) growth chamber (Concept-M; Baker Ruskinn, United Kingdom). Genomic DNA was isolated from a single colony of each of the strains using the MagAttract HMW DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and quantified in a Qubit 3.0 fluorimeter (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The genomic DNA library was prepared using the Nextera DNA Flex library prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Libraries were analyzed for concentration, pooled, and denatured for loading onto a flow cell for cluster generation. Denatured libraries were sequenced on the Illumina MiniSeq platform with a 2 × 150-bp paired-end read protocol with more than 400× coverage. Read quality was assessed with FastQC version 1.0.0. (Illumina BaseSpace Labs). The genome was assembled de novo using SPAdes (version 3.9.0). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. Virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes, genome size, N50 values, paired-end reads, genome coverage, genes, pseudogenes, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), rRNAs, tRNAs, and coding sequences (CDSs) were determined using the Illumina Bacterial Analysis Pipeline version 1.0.4 and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) version 4.3. A description of the characteristics of the eight Campylobacter coli strains is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of eight Campylobacter coli strains

Strain name GenBank accession no. BioProject no. SRA accession no. Genome coverage (×) Size (bp) No. of paired-end reads GC content (%) No. of contigs Total no. of genes No. of pseudogenes N50a (bp) No. of CDSs No. of tRNAs No. of rRNAs No. of ncRNAs
PSU100 RYEW00000000 PRJNA508208 SRR8321244 741 1,842,077 4,524,912 30.96 117 1,971 61 142,334 1,923 42 3 3
PSU101 RYEX00000000 PRJNA510094 SRR8321238 409 1,838,143 2,491,397 30.96 99 1,960 59 142,334 1,912 42 3 3
PSU116 RYFA00000000 PRJNA510096 SRR8321240 558 1,841,945 3,408,416 30.96 110 1,957 59 142,334 1,909 42 3 3
PSU129 RYEY00000000 PRJNA510100 SRR8321242 482 1,677,628 2,682,276 31.33 49 1,758 40 162,680 1,710 42 3 3
PSU148 RYVW00000000 PRJNA510960 SRR8360371 578 1,823,297 3,491,607 31.13 164 1,962 86 163,420 1,913 42 4 3
PSU150 RYEZ00000000 PRJNA510101 SRR8321246 500 1,696,483 2,812,050 31.34 83 1,780 41 162,680 1,732 42 3 3
PSU165 RYVV00000000 PRJNA510961 SRR8360372 557 1,824,456 3,369,414 31.13 171 1,957 82 163,420 1,911 39 4 3
PSU172 RYVX00000000 PRJNA510962 SRR8360373 604 1,815,101 3,634,447 31.12 127 1,947 75 142,019 1,898 42 4 3
a

The N50 value is the size of the shortest contig in the set of longest contigs that together cover at least 50% of the total genome size.

Antibiotic resistance includes that to beta-lactams (blaOXA-61) (Illumina Bacterial Analysis Pipeline version 1.0.4). The Campylobacter coli strains were positive for most of the virulence factors related to motility, chemotaxis, adhesion, and invasion, including cytolethal distending toxin (cdtB), multidrug efflux pumps (cmeB, cmeC, and cmeR), iron uptake regulator (fur), chemotaxis proteins (cheB, cheV, and cheW), and flagellar proteins (flhA, flhB, flip, fliQ, fliR, fliF, fliY, fliM, fliA, fliK, flgE, flgI, and flgH) (NCBI Sequence Set Browser). This is consistent with recent studies showing that cmeABC and cdtABC genes were detected in Campylobacter coli isolates (7, 8). These genomic data sets will be useful for developing methods for the control of Campylobacter coli in foods.

Data availability.

The whole-genome shotgun projects reported here have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers, BioProject numbers, and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession numbers listed in Table 1. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service National Program Project 108, Food Safety Project 8072-42000-078-00D.

The Campylobacter coli strains sequenced in this study were kindly supplied to us by the laboratory of Catherine Cutter at Penn State University, Department of Food Science.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M-A, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM. 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17:7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.p11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Batz MB, Hoffmann S, Morris JG. 2012. Ranking the disease burden of 14 pathogens in food sources in the United States using attribution data from outbreak investigations and expert elicitation. J Food Prot 75:1278–1291. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Humphrey T, O’Brien S, Madsen M. 2007. Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective. Int J Food Microbiol 117:237–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bolton DJ. 2015. Campylobacter virulence and survival factors. Food Microbiol 48:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scheinberg J, Doores S, Cutter CN. 2013. A microbiological comparison of poultry products obtained from farmers’ markets and supermarkets in Pennsylvania. J Food Saf 33:259–264. doi: 10.1111/jfs.12047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gunther NW IV, Almond J, Yan X, Needleman DS. 2011. GyrB versus 16s rRna sequencing for the identification of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter lari. J Nucleic Acids Invest 2:7. doi: 10.4081/jnai.2011.2303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Denis M, Nagard B, Rose V, Bourgoin K, Cutimbo M, Kerouanton A. 2017. No clear differences between organic or conventional pig farms in the genetic diversity or virulence of Campylobacter coli isolates. Front Microbiol 8:1016. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cantero G, Correa-Fiz F, Ronco T, Strube M, Cerdà-Cuéllar M, Pedersen K. 2018. Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli broiler isolates by whole-genome sequencing. Foodborne Pathog Dis 15:145–152. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2017.2325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome shotgun projects reported here have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers, BioProject numbers, and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession numbers listed in Table 1. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES