Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Jul 11;8(28):e00735-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00735-19

Whole-Genome Sequences of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Isolates from Canine and Human Bacteremia Infections

Sara V Little a, Laura K Bryan a, Andrew E Hillhouse a,b, Kranti Konganti b, Sara D Lawhon a,
Editor: Steven R Gillc
PMCID: PMC6624775  PMID: 31296692

Here, we report the complete and draft genome sequences of 8 Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates, 4 from human bacteremia infections and 4 from canine bacteremia infections. This species is recognized primarily as an important canine pathogen, but it is increasingly being identified in human infections.

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the complete and draft genome sequences of 8 Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates, 4 from human bacteremia infections and 4 from canine bacteremia infections. This species is recognized primarily as an important canine pathogen, but it is increasingly being identified in human infections.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a major canine pathogen that, similarly to Staphylococcus aureus, has an increasing trend of multiple-drug resistance. The identification of S. pseudintermedius as a human pathogen has increased (16). Isolates may be misidentified as S. aureus, which can complicate treatment (5, 7, 8). The ability of staphylococci to exit the bloodstream and establish secondary infections in a myriad of tissues suggests a broad arsenal of virulence factors (911). Whole-genome sequencing of isolates from both humans and dogs may provide valuable insights into the virulence factors of the organism, as well as into potential differences in isolates causing human infections. Here, we present 8 whole-genome sequences of S. pseudintermedius from human and canine bacteremia cases.

Four human bacteremia isolates were acquired from a collection of 45 human isolates. A description of the isolates and their collection was previously published (5). Four canine bacteremia isolates were selected from isolates collected by the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the Texas Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital at Texas A&M University between 2007 and 2016. Isolates were stored in lysogeny broth supplemented with 10% glycerol at −80°C at the time of isolation. Isolates were originally identified, as previously described, as S. pseudintermedius, and identification was confirmed using multiplex PCR and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (5, 12). After sequencing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and ribosomal multilocus sequence typing (rMLST) were used to further confirm identification as S. pseudintermedius (13, 14). Prior to sequencing, isolates were revived by growing them on blood agar for 24 hours at 37°C. Isolates were subcultured twice to ensure purity. A single colony was inoculated into Bacto brain heart infusion broth (BHIB; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and grown for 8 hours at 37°C prior to extraction.

For Illumina sequencing, 1-ml aliquots of each isolate in BHIB were pelleted and lysed in a Qiagen TissueLyser using Macherey-Nagel bead tubes type B and lysis buffer from the NucleoMag tissue DNA kit. DNA isolation followed the manufacturer’s protocol (Macherey-Nagel). Libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera DNA Flex library preparation kit following the manufacturer’s protocol and sequenced with an Illumina MiSeq V2 2 × 250-bp kit. All data were uploaded to Illumina’s cloud-based resource, BaseSpace, for run monitoring, FASTQ generation, demultiplexing, and adapter trimming. The sequencing output of paired-end read sets contained approximately 1.5 million reads/isolate of 250 bp, resulting in approximately 300× coverage.

For MinION sequencing, DNA was extracted from a 1-ml aliquot of each isolate in BHIB using a MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit per the standard protocol, with the addition of lysostaphin during the lysing incubation. Libraries were prepared following the manufacturer’s protocol for 1D PCR barcoding of genomic DNA using the Nanopore SQK-LSK108 kit. Genomic DNA quality was verified on a genomic DNA TapeStation run (Agilent). Data collection was performed by MinKNOW software, utilizing the following workflow: NC_48Hr_Sequencing_Run_FLO_MIN106_SQK-LSK108.py. MinION sequencing data were demultiplexed and base called using Albacore Sequencing Pipeline Software version 1.2.4. Sequencing resulted in an output of read sets containing 100 to 500 Mb per sample, resulting in 40× to 200× coverage.

MinION reads were assembled using Canu version 1.5 (15). The draft genomes were polished using Pilon version 1.22 (16); the initial polishing run utilized BAM files of MiSeq reads mapped to the Canu draft genome (Bowtie2 version 2.3.4.3) (17, 18), and the subsequent runs used MiSeq reads mapped to the previously polished draft genome for a total of 3 polishing runs. The genomes were analyzed for completeness using Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) version 3 (19, 20) using the Firmicutes OrthoDB version 9 data set. Genomes were scaffolded using MeDuSa version 1.6 (21), using 3 reference genomes, namely, ED99 (GenBank accession number CP002478) and the two single-contig assemblies from this study (Tamu 51_92 and Tamu 53_60). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.

The final assemblies resulted in genomes between 2,561,987 bp and 2,615,859 bp (Table 1). The genomes consisted of 1 to 29 contigs per isolate, with the largest contigs ranging from 2,615,859 to 420,164 bp. Two genomes were complete single-contig assemblies, 2 were single-scaffold assemblies, and 4 were draft genomes of 2 to 3 scaffolds. BUSCO scores for the genomes ranged from 98.7% to 99.6%.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics and accession numbers of genome sequences of S. pseudintermedius bacteremia isolatesa

Isolate Source No. of contigs No. of scaffolds BUSCO (%) N50 (bp) Genome size (bp) G+C content (%) GenBank accession no. SRA accession no.
MinION FastQ MinION Fast5 MiSeq
Tamu 46_57 Canine 13 2 99.20 638,705 2,561,987 37.7 SEZZ00000000 SRR8538958 SRR9211302 SRR8538959
Tamu 49_44 Canine 20 1 98.70 385,638 2,583,863 37.67 CP035743 SRR8538960 SRR9211301 SRR8538961
Tamu 50_21 Canine 7 2 99.60 1,401,107 2,527,337 37.74 SEZY00000000 SRR8538954 SRR9211304 SRR8538955
Tamu 51_92 Canine 1 1 99.60 2,512,263 2,512,263 37.8 CP035742 SRR8538956 SRR9211303 SRR8538957
Tamu 53_58 Human 24 2 99.60 238,709 2,655,352 37.42 SEZX00000000 SRR8538952 SRR9211298 SRR8538953
Tamu 53_60 Human 1 1 99.60 2,615,859 2,615,859 37.47 CP035741 SRR8538946 SRR9211297 SRR8538947
Tamu 53_63 Human 29 3 99.60 191,852 2,628,670 37.59 SEZW00000000 SRR8538948 SRR9211300 SRR8538949
Tamu 53_88 Human 5 1 99.60 1,396,228 2,593,641 37.69 CP035740 SRR8538950 SRR9211299 SRR8538951
a

BioProject accession number PRJNA521119.

Data availability.

This whole-genome project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PRJNA521119. SRA and genome accession numbers are listed in Table 1. This announcement presents the first version of each genome.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding was provided by the Veterinary Orthopedic Society and the Morris Animal Foundation (pilot data grant D15CA-833: Quorum Sensing in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius) and through the Texas A&M University Clinical Science and Translational Research (CSTR) Institute Pilot Funding Program. Sara V. Little was supported by a Texas A&M University Diversity Fellowship and a Walter W. Lechner Scholarship.

We acknowledge the Texas A&M Institute for Genome Sciences and Society (TIGSS) for providing computational resources and systems administration support for the TIGSS High Performance Computing (HPC) Cluster.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Börjesson S, Gómez-Sanz E, Ekström K, Torres C, Grönlund U. 2015. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius can be misdiagnosed as Staphylococcus aureus in humans with dog bite wounds. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:839–844. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2300-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kelesidis T, Tsiodras S. 2010. Staphylococcus intermedius is not only a zoonotic pathogen, but may also cause skin abscesses in humans after exposure to saliva. Int J Infect Dis 14:e838–e841. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.2249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee J, Murray A, Bendall R, Gaze W, Zhang L, Vos M. 2015. Improved detection of Staphylococcus intermedius group in a routine diagnostic laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 53:961–963. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02474-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yarbrough ML, Lainhart W, Burnham CA. 2018. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of human clinical isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius group. J Clin Microbiol 56:e01788-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01788-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu MT, Burnham CA, Westblade LF, Dien Bard J, Lawhon SD, Wallace MA, Stanley T, Burd E, Hindler J, Humphries RM. 2016. Evaluation of oxacillin and cefoxitin disk and MIC breakpoints for prediction of methicillin resistance in human and veterinary isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius group. J Clin Microbiol 54:535–542. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02864-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stegmann R, Burnens A, Maranta CA, Perreten V. 2010. Human infection associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2047–2048. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bemis DA, Jones RD, Frank LA, Kania SA. 2009. Evaluation of susceptibility test breakpoints used to predict mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 21:53–58. doi: 10.1177/104063870902100108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schissler JR, Hillier A, Daniels JB, Cole LK, Gebreyes WA. 2009. Evaluation of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 21:684–688. doi: 10.1177/104063870902100514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Edwards AM, Massey RC. 2011. How does Staphylococcus aureus escape the bloodstream? Trends Microbiol 19:184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Hook M. 2014. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:49–62. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Otto M. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus toxins. Curr Opin Microbiol 17:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Tanaka Y, Sakusabe A, Ohtsuka M, Hirotaki S, Kawakami T, Fukata T, Hiramatsu K. 2010. Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 48:765–769. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01232-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Solyman SM, Black CC, Duim B, Perreten V, van Duijkeren E, Wagenaar JA, Eberlein LC, Sadeghi LN, Videla R, Bemis DA, Kania SA. 2013. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Clin Microbiol 51:306–310. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02421-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jolley KA, Bliss CM, Bennett JS, Bratcher HB, Brehony C, Colles FM, Wimalarathna H, Harrison OB, Sheppard SK, Cody AJ, Maiden MC. 2012. Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing: universal characterization of bacteria from domain to strain. Microbiology 158:1005–1015. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055459-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Waterhouse RM, Seppey M, Simao FA, Manni M, Ioannidis P, Klioutchnikov G, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2017. BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol 35:543–548. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bosi E, Donati B, Galardini M, Brunetti S, Sagot MF, Lio P, Crescenzi P, Fani R, Fondi M. 2015. MeDuSa: a multi-draft based scaffolder. Bioinformatics 31:2443–2451. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This whole-genome project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PRJNA521119. SRA and genome accession numbers are listed in Table 1. This announcement presents the first version of each genome.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES