Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
. 2019 May 26;7(7):e00771. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.771

Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants in a cohort of Bahraini breast cancer patients using next‐generation sequencing

Fatima Al Hannan 1, Michael B Keogh 1,✉, Safa Taha 2, Latifa Al Buainain 3
PMCID: PMC6625152  PMID: 31131559

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. About 5%–10% are due to hereditary predisposition. The contribution of BRCA1/2 mutations to familial breast cancer in Bahrain has not been explored. The objective of this study was to investigate the spectrum of BRCA1/2 genetic variants and estimate their frequencies in familial breast cancer. We also aim to test the efficiency of the next‐generation sequencing (NGS) as a powerful tool for detecting genetic variation within BRCA1/2 genes.

Methods

Twenty‐five unrelated female patients diagnosed with familial breast cancer were screened for BRCA1/2 variants. All targeted coding exons and exon–intron boundaries of BRCA1/2 genes were amplified with 167 pairs of primers by NGS.

Results

We have identified two deleterious BRCA1/2 variants in two patients, one in BRCA1 gene (c.4850C>A) and other in BRCA2 gene (c.67+2T>C). In addition to the deleterious variants, we identified 24 distinct missense variants of uncertain significance, 10 of them are seen to confer minor but cumulatively significant risk of breast cancer.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that BRCA1/2 variants may contribute to the pathogenesis of familial breast cancer in Bahrain. It also shows that NGS is useful tool for screening BRCA1/2 genetic variants of probands and unaffected relatives.

Keywords: Bahrain, BRCA1/2, breast cancer, next‐generation sequencing, variants

1. INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women worldwide (Ferlay et al., 2015). Approximately, 5%–10% of breast cancer cases may possess breast cancer susceptibility genes predisposing to an increased risk of malignancy (Cobain, Milliron, & Merajver, 2016). Genetic linkage studies have identified BRCA1 (OMIM# 113705) and BRCA2 (OMIM# 600185) as two major genes associated with hereditary breast cancer and high breast cancer risk. These tumor suppressor genes were reported and identified as breast cancer susceptibility genes for the first time in 1990 and 1995 and are located on chromosome 17q21 and 13q12‐13, respectively (Hall et al., 1990; Wooster et al., 1995). The functions of BRCA1/2 are crucial for normal cell function as they are involved in the cellular DNA repair and inhibition of uncontrolled cell growth (Lou et al., 2014). Germline mutations in these two highly penetrant genes are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern and can increase the lifetime risk of developing breast cancer by as much as 80%. Women who carry BRCA1/2 mutations have a significantly increased risk of developing breast cancer before the age of 50 years (Couch, Nathanson, & Offit, 2014).

More than 1,800 distinct BRCA1 and 2,000 BRCA2 mutations have been reported in the Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) database (Couch et al., 2014). These mutations are widely scattered across both genes and most affect the structure, integrity and function of the gene. Some studies have shown that the proportion of BRCA1/2 mutations could be higher in Arab women when compared to other populations (Tadmouri, Sastry, & Chouchane, 2014). Studies in Morocco (Jouali et al., 2016; Laraqui et al., 2013), Algeria (Cherbal et al., 2010; Henouda et al., 2016), Tunisia (Mahfoudh et al., 2012; Riahi et al., 2015), Middle East (Bu et al., 2016), Egypt (Kim et al., 2017), Lebanon (Jalkh et al., 2017), Saudi Arabia (Merdad et al., 2015), and Qatar (Bujassoum, Bugrein, & Al‐Sulaiman, 2017) have revealed the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations in cases of familial breast cancer. In Bahrain, no research has been done so far to elucidate the genetic background of heritable breast cancer although Bahrain has the highest incidence of breast cancers compared to other countries in GCC. The age‐standardized rate per 100,000 women is 53.4 for Bahrain followed by Qatar (48.2) and Kuwait (46.6) (Chouchane, Boussen, & Sastry, 2013). Breast cancer in Bahrain has specific characteristics; the most important is the relatively younger age of onset and advanced stage at presentation (Hamadeh, Abulfatih, Fekri, & Al‐Mehza, 2014). These observations can be attributed to undetermined genetic lesions accumulating in the population due to consanguineous marriages and increased exposure to environmental insults as well as differences in fertility rates and duration of breastfeeding (Hamadeh et al., 2014; Ravichandran & Al‐Zahrani, 2009).

In Bahrain, the breast cancer screening by mammography was introduced in 2005 and essentially subjected to high‐risk suspected cases for women aged 40 and above. The screening program since introduced has contributed to the diagnosis of 12.7% of the cases (Hamadeh et al., 2014). The low percentage of detected cases merits further evaluation of the Bahraini cancer prevention programs to better screening services that aid in early detection and defining of high‐risk individuals in the population. The main objective of the present study was to investigate the contribution of BRCA1/2 variants in familial and early onset breast cancer in Bahraini women using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and to test the efficiency of the NGS in the diagnosis and screening programs of breast cancer patients in the region. The overall objective was to better understand the genetic risk factors associated with the disease which could eventually lead to an earlier detection with better prognosis and survival rates.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Editorial policies and ethical considerations

The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki declaration and the study protocol was approved by the Ethical research committees of Royal college of Surgeons in Ireland‐Bahrain and Bahrain Defence Force hospital in Bahrain. All the participants signed informed consent.

2.2. Patients

Patients were selected for this study if they have at least one of the following conditions: early onset breast cancer, at least one first‐ or two‐second degree relatives with breast cancer; breast cancer with advanced tumor staging/grading. Peripheral blood was obtained from 25 different unrelated Bahraini families following obtaining their informed consent and their family history of breast cancer. Patient's recruitment and blood sampling were all performed according to the institutional ethical procedures. All samples were anonymized and blindly sequenced and analyzed.

2.3. DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated from 200 µl peripheral blood anti‐coagulated with EDTA on the MagNa Pure LC instrument using MagNa Pure LC DNA Isolation Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of DNA was determined by using the Nano Drop™ 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermos Fisher, Yokohama, Japan).

2.4. Next‐generation sequencing analysis

All targeted coding exons and exon–intron boundaries of BRCA1/2 genes were amplified with 167 pairs of primers in three primer pair pools. After the targeted amplification and construction of a library through Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit 2.0, the nucleotide sequences of the targeted regions are analyzed by Life Technologies Ion PGM platform on an Ion 316 Chip. Sequence variants are identified by Torrent Suite 4.2 (Life Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The clinical significance of each sequence variant is suggested on the basis of reference to ClinVar and BIC (Landrum et al., 2014). The NGS protocol which we used has been explained elsewhere (Hirotsu et al., 2015).

The reference sequences used were NM_007294.3 for BRCA1 and NM_000059.3 for BRCA2. Minor allele frequency was determined from the 1000 Genomes Project database (Abecasis et al., 2012) http://www.internationalgenome.org/1000-genomes-browsers/ and the Human Genetic Variation Database (http://www.hgvd.genome.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Clinical characteristics and detection of BRCA1/2 variants

To analyse the prevalence of breast cancer with BRCA1/2 genetic variants, we screened BRCA1/2 variants in the 25 recruited patients with personal and family history of breast cancer. All women were diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. The median age at diagnosis of breast cancer was 47 years (range 33–63). DNA was extracted from patient's peripheral blood samples. We amplified targeted coding regions and exon–intron boundaries of BRCA1/2 genes using multiplex PCR. A total of 167 primer pairs were used in three primer pools covering 16.25 KB of target genomic sequence. Targeted genomic sequencing was performed using the Ion Torrent PGM System from Life Technologies generating short sequence reads of approximately 200 bp. We have identified two deleterious BRCA1/2 variants in two patients, one in BRCA1 gene (c.4850C>A) and other in BRCA2 gene (c.67+2T>C). In addition to the deleterious variants, we have identified 24 missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS).

3.2. Clinical presentation of the heterozygous carrier of the BRCA1 variant c.4850C>A

The carrier of BRCA1 variant c.4850C>A was diagnosed with right breast cancer at age 33 and had a positive family history of breast cancer (a mother diagnosed with breast cancer at age 57, a daughter and maternal aunt diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40). There was no family history of ovarian cancer. Patient presented with right breast lump noticed 2 days prior to presentation that radiological investigations did not reveal any breast lesions or distant metastasis; however, fine needle aspiration reported malignancy.

The tumor was classified as a stage 2 loco‐regional malignancy, and the histopathology results confirmed the diagnosis of an invasive ductal carcinoma grade 3, measuring 23 mm in maximum dimension. Two palpable mobile axillary nodes were observed during examination. The patient underwent wide local excision of right breast tumor and right axillary clearance.

3.3. Clinical presentation of the heterozygous carrier of the BRCA2 variant c.67+2T>C

This is a Bahraini woman, known case of hypertension and hyperlipidemia with history of abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy for endometrial cancer 9 years prior to her presentation. The patient has a very strong family history of breast cancer including her mother and maternal aunt (diagnosed before age 50). She has presented with right axillary swelling and right arm pain. At investigation, a deep right breast lump was observed occupying the upper outer quadrant. Two palpable metastatic axillary nodes were observed during examination. The tumor was classified as a stage 2 loco‐regional malignancy, and the histopathology results confirmed the diagnosis of an invasive papillary carcinoma (grade 2), measuring 4 cm in maximum dimension. The patient underwent right mastectomy and axillary clearance.

3.4. Deleterious variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes

The analysis of BRCA1/2 genes of the 25 patients revealed two deleterious variants in two unrelated patients with total frequency of 8% (2/25), one within BRCA1 and other within BRCA2 (Table 1). The BRCA1 variant c.4850C>A was nonsense mutation located in exon 16 and the BRCA2 variant c.67+2T>C was a splice‐site mutation located in intron 2. As previously published, any type of insertion or deletion or amino acid substitution that result in premature stop codons before amino acids 1853 within the BRCA1 was classified as mutated (Carraro et al., 2013). The identified heterozygous BRCA1 nonsense variant c.4850C>A creates a premature stop codon at amino acid 1617 leading to premature truncated protein. The carrier of the BRCA1 c.4850C>A which was detected in this study is an early onset patient, the age at onset was 33 years.

Table 1.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious variants identified in the 25 breast cancer patients

Gene Ex/Int dbSNP Genomic position Nucleotide
change 		AA
change 		Mutation
type 		Var
Allele
Freq 		BIC/
ClinVar 		Clinical status
BRCA1 Ex. 16 — Chr17:41223144 c.4850C>A p.Ser1617X NS 2% Unreported/ Unreported ‐Invasive ductal carcinoma
‐Grade 3
‐Stage 2B
‐FH (+)
BRCA2 Int. 2 rs81002885 Chr13:32890666 c.67+2T>C Splice donor site IVS
Splice site 		2% CI/ Pathogenic ‐Invasive papillary carcinoma
‐Grade 2
‐Stage 2B
‐FH (+)
Open in a new tab

AA, amino acid; BIC, breast cancer core database; Cl, clinically significant; Ex, exon; FH, family history; Int, intron; IVS, intervening sequence; NS, nonsense; SNP, Single‐nucleotide polymorphism; (+), positive.

The second detected heterozygous BRCA2 c.67+2T>C variant is located 2 nucleotide downstream of intron 2; The BRCA2 c.67+2T>C splice‐site variant has been previously identified as a pathogenic mutation and already described in the BIC database (Diez et al., 2003; Houdayer et al., 2012).

3.5. Polymorphisms and unclassified sequence variants

Based on the data obtained by the NGS analysis, we have detected a total of 24 missense VUS including 11 BRCA1 and 13 BRCA2 variants (Tables 2 and 3). Of these, four BRCA1 VUS and nine BRCA2 VUS were rare variants according to 1000 genome project data (≤1% population minor allele frequency) (Table 2). By contract, seven BRCA1 and four BRCA2 were present at high frequencies in the study subjects and in >1% of the population (Table 3). According to 1000 genome project MAF data, those polymorphisms were indicated as common polymorphisms (Hirotsu et al., 2015; Landrum et al., 2014).

Table 2.

Rare variants of uncertain significance found in patients with breast cancer

Gene Ex/Int. dbSNP Genomic
position 		Nucleotide change AA change Mutation
type 		Var Allele
Freq 		BIC ClinVar SIFT
prediction 		1000 genome
MAF (%)
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs56082113 Ch17:41245090 c.2458A>G p.Lys820Glu MS 2% Unknown Benign TOLERATED 1.04
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs1800704 Ch17:41244524 c.3024G>A p.Met1008Ile MS 2% Unknown Benign TOLERATED 0.06
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs2227945 Ch17:41244130 c.3418A>G p.Ser1140Gly MS 8% Unknown Benign TOLERATED 1
BRCA1 Ex.16 rs1799967 Ch17:41222975 c.4956G>A p.Met1652Ile MS 2% Unknown Benign TOLERATED 1
BRCA2 Ex.14 rs4986860 Ch13:32929309 c.7319A>G p.His2440Arg MS 2% NCS Benign TOLERATED 1.04
BRCA2 Ex.22 rs4987047 Ch13:32953529 c.8830A>T p.Ile2944Phe MS 4% NCS Benign DAMAGING 0.9
BRCA2 Ex.11 rs28897744 Ch13:32930673 c.7544C>T p.Thr2515Ile MS 2% NCS Benign DAMAGING —
BRCA2 Ex.11 rs41293485 Ch13:32912361 c.3869G>A p.Cys1290Tyr MS 2% NCS Benign TOLERATED 0.34
BRCA2 Ex.11 rs4987117 Ch13:32914236 c.5744C>T p.Thr1915Met MS 2% NCS Benign TOLERATED 0.8
BRCA2 Ex.11 rs35029074 Ch13:32914815 c.6323G>A p.Arg2108His MS 2% Unknown Benign TOLERATED 0.38
BRCA2 Ex.24 rs80359189 Ch13:32954268 c.9242T>C p.Val3081Ala MS 2% Unknown Conflicting DAMAGING —
BRCA2 Ex.26 rs80359228 Ch13:32971119 c.9586A>G p.Lys3196Glu MS 2% Unknown Conflicting DAMAGING 0.02
BRCA2 Ex. 27 rs11571833 Ch17:32972626 c.9976A>T p.Lys3326* NS 2% NCS Benign N/A 0.4
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; Ex, exon; Int, intron; MAF, minor allele frequency; MS, missense; NA, not available; NCS, No clinical significance; NS, nonsense; SIFT, sorting tolerant from intolerant; SNP, Single‐nucleotide polymorphism; Var, variant.

*

Neutral stop codon.

Table 3.

Common variants of uncertain significance found in patients with breast cancer

Gene Ex/Int dbSNP Genomic position Nucleotide change AA change Mutation type Var Allele Freq BIC ClinVar SIFT Prediction 1000 genome MAF (%)
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs16942 Ch17:41244000 c.3548A>G p.Lys1183Arg MS 38% NCS Benign TOLERATED 35.260
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs16941 Ch17: 41244435 c.3113A>G p.Glu1038Gly MS 36% NCS Benign DAMAGING 33.570
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs799917 Ch17: 41244936 c.2612C>T p.Pro871Leu MS 50% NCS Benign DAMAGING 45.610
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs4986850 Ch17: 41245471 c.2077G>A p.Asp693Asn MS 10% NCS Benign DAMAGING 3.360
BRCA1 Ex.16 rs1799966 Ch17: 41223094 c.4900A>G p.Ser1634Gly MS 38% Unreported Benign DAMAGING 35.580
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs1799950 Ch17: 41246481 c.1067A>G p.Gln356Arg MS 2% Unknown Benign DAMAGING 2.180
BRCA1 Ex.11 rs16940 Ch17: 41245237 c.2311T>C p.Leu771Leu MS 34% NCS Benign NA 33.530
BRCA2 Ex.10 rs144848 Ch13: 32906729 c.1114A>C p.Asn372His MS 38% NCS Benign TOLERATED 24.940
BRCA2 Ex.10 rs766173 Ch13: 2906480 c.865A>C p.Asn289His MS 6% NCS Benign DAMAGING 7.370
BRCA2 Ex.14 rs169547 Ch13: 32929387 c.7397T>C p.Val2466Ala MS 96% NCS Benign TOLERATED 2.42
BRCA2 Ex.11 rs1799944 Ch13: 32911463 c.2971A>G p.Asn991Asp MS 6% NCS Benign TOLERATED 8.010
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; Ex, exon; Int, intron; MAF, minor allele frequency; MS, missense; NA, not available; NCS, No clinical significance; SIFT, sorting tolerant from intolerant; SNP, Single‐nucleotide polymorphism; Var, variant.

We next applied SIFT (sorting tolerant from intolerant) which uses sequence homology to predict whether an amino acid substitution will affect protein function and hence, potentially alter phenotype to the missense substitutions associated with the disease. SIFT predicted 42% of the detected 24 variants to be damaging. The SIFT algorithm and software have been described previously (Ng & Henikoff, 2001, 2002).

4. DISCUSSION

The incidence of breast cancer is on the raise in Bahrain with a remarkable number of those affected are being diagnosed before they are 50 years old with advanced stage of cancer at presentation (Chouchane et al., 2013). The aggressive and early onset of the breast cancer in this population could be relatively explained by undermined breast cancer predisposition genetic factor(s) due to consanguineous marriages and shift in life styles (Hamadeh et al., 2014; Ravichandran & Al‐Zahrani, 2009). BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations have been shown to play a significant role in genetic predisposition to breast cancer. To our knowledge, the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants to hereditary breast cancer in Bahraini women has not been studied before. This is the first published report which shows the spectrum and the frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants among Bahraini women.

We performed a pilot whole BRCA gene sequencing study on DNA obtained from the peripheral blood samples of 25 Bahraini females with breast cancer. It was observed that the mean age of onset of breast cancer among this group of patients (47 years) is identical to the figures previously reported for the Arab population, a decade earlier than western countries (Fitzmaurice et al., 2015). Using a carefully optimized NGS screening approach, we were able to analyze all coding exons and flanking intronic regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Based on documented knowledge on effects of variants that give rise to premature stop codons (via frameshift insertions or deletions, nonsense or consensus splice‐site sequence changes) or missense alterations at critical residues in functional domains, we defined one BRCA1 c.4850C>A and one BRCA2 c.67+2T>C as deleterious variants in two patients. Interestingly, both patients showed a very strong family history of breast cancer suggestive of genetic predisposition to breast cancer. The two deleterious variants were observed in two unrelated patients out of the 25 subjects studied providing an overall prevalence rate of 8%. Some studies conducted in other Arab countries such as Tunis and Saudi Arabia have reported frequencies of 16%–25% (Mahfoudh et al., 2012; Riahi et al., 2015) and 2.5%–28% (Merdad et al., 2015), respectively. Overall, as previous studies showed 3%–28% of familial breast cancer cases are linked to variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The differences observed are mainly due to sampling size and other features related to patients inclusion criteria and their ethnicity.

In BRCA1 gene, we detected one deleterious variant c.4850C>A in exon 16. In the present report, this variant was observed in a patient diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at age 33. This patient reported to have a family history of breast cancer (a mother diagnosed with breast cancer at age 57, a daughter and maternal aunt diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40). BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA and encoding a 1863 amino acid protein with an N‐terminal RING finger domain and two BRCT—(BRCA1‐C‐terminal) domains. The identified BRCA1 nonsense variant c.4850C>A was predicted to be causative because it creates a premature stop codon at amino acid 1617 leading to premature truncated protein. To the best of our knowledge, the BRCA1 variant c.4850C>A was not reported previously elsewhere except in a recent study conducted in Qatar where two patients were found to be positive carriers for the c.4850C>A variant (Bujassoum et al., 2017). However, this variant has not been yet officially registered in the BIC database or other resources suggesting that it could be a unique or novel variant to the gulf region. Carraro et al. have detected the variant c.4968insGT in BRCA1 for the first time in his study in early onset breast cancer Brazilian patients and had identified it as pathogenic deleterious variant because it results in a premature stop codon at amino acid 1617 (Carraro et al., 2013). This confirms our finding that the variant we identified in our study c.4850C>A is considered as deleterious variant as they both lead to a premature stop codon at amino acid 1617.

In BRCA2 gene, we detected one splice‐site donor variant c.67+2T>C that leads to an aberrant transcript in intron 2. BRCA2 is a large gene with 27 exons that encode a protein of 3,418 amino acids. The variant c.67+2T>C occurs within a consensus splice junction, and it is predicted to result in abnormal mRNA splicing which leads to unfunctional protein. The splice variants were generated by base substitutions, which either create or destroy splice acceptor and donor sites of the genes (Diez et al., 2003). In the present report, this variant was observed in a patient diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma whom was reported to have a strong family history of breast cancer (her mother, sisters, and maternal aunts). This variant is reported in the BIC database and had been found previously in Latin American/Western European populations (Diez et al., 2003).

Additionally, we have identified 24 sequence variants (11 BRCA1 and 13 BRCA2) including distinct polymorphisms and unclassified sequence variants.

Among the identified SNPs, 5 BRCA1 SNPs (rs1799950 (4%), rs16942 (64%), rs4986850 (20%), rs2227945 (16%), and rs1799966 (64%)) and 5 BRCA2 SNPs (rs766173 (12%), rs144848 (60%), rs4987117 (4%), rs4987047 (8%), and rs11571833 (4%)) are found to confer minor but cumulatively significant risk of breast cancer (Johnson et al., 2007). In cancer predisposition genes, there are 25 globally known SNPs identified to increase risk of breast cancer and of the 25, 14 SNPs are located in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (Johnson et al., 2007). Ten BRCA SNPs out of the 14 BRCA SNPs have been identified in our study subjects.

This study also confirmed the utility of NGS for performing the genetic testing of hereditary breast cancer based on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic alterations. As the causative mutations are distributed throughout the genes, we here recommend that that the technique is suitable to detect variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and other tumor suppressor genes. Identifying founder mutations would enable us to examine specific loci in the screening of high‐risk subpopulations for inherited breast cancer without performing a full sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Founder mutations have previously been described for some population as in Ashkenazi Jewish population, 3% of individuals carried BRCA1 c.185delAG, BRCA1 c.5382insC or BRCA2 c.6174delT mutations (Wiesman et al., 2017). The frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations varies among population (Chopra & Kelly, 2017). The knowledge of the spectrum of mutations and their geographical distribution could provide more efficient approach for screening protocol and allow more rapid, less expensive and more affordable genetic testing strategy.

Our study had some limitations; the major one is the small sample size due to budget constraints and being a single institution study. The protocol applied here allows the identification of BRCA genes only; however, there are other few genes that were found to play a role in increasing susceptibility to breast cancer but at markedly lower frequency and penetrance. These genes include ATM, TP53, CHECK2, PTEN, STK11, PALB2, BRIP, and the RAD51 genes (Merdad et al., 2015). In fact, the frequency of TP53 mutations among Saudi patients is one of the highest in the world (Al‐Qasem et al., 2011; Chopra & Kelly, 2017). Further researches are needed to elucidate the spectrum of mutations in those genes to confirm their association with the increase risk of developing breast cancer in the population.

5. CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this is the first report on the breast cancer predisposition factors in the population of Bahrain and our data suggest that BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants may contribute to the pathogenesis of familial breast cancer in Bahraini patients. We detected two deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in two unrelated patients, one in BRCA1 gene (c.4850C>A) and other in BRCA2 gene (c.67+2T>C). The identified BRCA1 variant c.4850C>A has been reported in a Qatari study and in this report only suggesting that it might be novel to the gulf region. We also showed that NGS is a useful tool to explore mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and can be used to screen mutations in probands and unaffected relatives from the same family.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUTIONS

FA conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, carried out the molecular genetics studies, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. MK arranged for the study funding, participated in the study coordination, and revised the manuscript. ST supervised the sequencing experiment and revised the manuscript. LA looked after patients' recruitment, gathering the clinical data, and revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge the generous funding received through Think Pink Bahrain (Charity Registration number 97832). Authors are also grateful to Macrogen Inc. (Korea) for managing the next‐generation sequencing.

Al Hannan F, Keogh MB, Taha S, Al Buainain L. Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants in a cohort of Bahraini breast cancer patients using next‐generation sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7:e771 10.1002/mgg3.771

Funding information

This research was supported by a fund from Think Pink Bahrain (Charity Registration number 97832). The funding bodies neither had role in the design or implementation of the experiment nor in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or the writing of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement: All the data used in this study are from public sources. The reference sequences (accession numbers: NM_007294.3 for BRCA1 and NM_000059.3 for BRCA2) used in this study were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information sequence read archive, NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and is publicly available for non‐commercial purposes. The clinical significance of each sequence variant is suggested based on reference to ClinVar and BIC. BIC: Breast Cancer Information Core (http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic). ClinVar: Database of mutations and their clinical relevance (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/). The NGS datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author (in FASTQ files) on reasonable request.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All the data used in this study are from public sources. The reference sequences (accession numbers: NM_007294.3 for BRCA1 and NM_000059.3 for BRCA2) used in this study were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information sequence read archive, NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and is publicly available for non‐commercial purposes. The clinical significance of each sequence variant is suggested based on reference to ClinVar and BIC. BIC: Breast Cancer Information Core (http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic). ClinVar: Database of mutations and their clinical relevance (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/). The NGS datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author (in FASTQ files) on reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  1. Abecasis, G. R. , Auton, A. , Brooks, L. D. , DePristo, M. A. , Durbin, R. M. , Handsaker, R. E. , … McVean, G. A. (2012). An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature, 491(7422), 56–65. 10.1038/nature11632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐qasem, A. J. , Toulimat, M. , Eldali, A. M. , Tulbah, A. , Al‐yousef, N. , Al‐daihan, S. K. , … Aboussekhra, A. (2011). TP53 genetic alterations in Arab breast cancer patients: Novel mutations, pattern and distribution. Oncology Letters, 2(2), 363–369. 10.3892/ol.2011.236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bu, R. , Siraj, A. K. , Al‐Obaisi, K. A. , Beg, S. , Al Hazmi, M. , Ajarim, D. , … Al‐Kuraya, K. S. (2016). Identification of novel BRCA founder mutations in Middle Eastern breast cancer patients using capture and Sanger sequencing analysis. International Journal of Cancer, 139(5), 1091–1097. 10.1002/ijc.30143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bujassoum, S. M. , Bugrein, H. A. , & Al‐Sulaiman, R. (2017). Genotype and phenotype correlation of breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and non‐carriers. Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy, 9(2), 358–362. 10.4172/1948-5956.1000442 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carraro, D. M. , Koike Folgueira, M. A. A. , Garcia Lisboa, B. C. , Ribeiro Olivieri, E. H. , Vitorino Krepischi, A. C. , de Carvalho, A. F. , … Brentani, M. M. (2013). Comprehensive analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 germline mutation and tumor characterization: A portrait of early‐onset breast cancer in Brazil. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57581 10.1371/journal.pone.0057581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cherbal, F. , Bakour, R. , Adane, S. , Boualga, K. , Benais‐Pont, G. , & Maillet, P. (2010). BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations screening in Algerian breast/ovarian cancer families. Disease Markers, 28(6), 377–384. 10.3233/dma-2010-0718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chopra, I. , & Kelly, K. M. (2017). Cancer risk information sharing: The experience of individuals receiving genetic counseling for BRCA1/2 mutations. Journal of Health Communication, 22(2), 143–152. 10.1080/10810730.2016.1258743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chouchane, L. , Boussen, H. , & Sastry, K. S. (2013). Breast cancer in Arab populations: Molecular characteristics and disease management implications. The Lancet Oncology, 14(10), e417–424. 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70165-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cobain, E. F. , Milliron, K. J. , & Merajver, S. D. (2016). Updates on breast cancer genetics: Clinical implications of detecting syndromes of inherited increased susceptibility to breast cancer. Seminars in Oncology, 43(5), 528–535. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Couch, F. J. , Nathanson, K. L. , & Offit, K. (2014). Two decades after BRCA: Setting paradigms in personalized cancer care and prevention. Science, 343(6178), 1466–1470. 10.1126/science.1251827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Diez, O. , Osorio, A. , Duran, M. , Martinez‐Ferrandis, J. I. , de la Hoya, M. , Salazar, R. , … Baiget, M. (2003). Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Spanish breast/ovarian cancer patients: A high proportion of mutations unique to Spain and evidence of founder effects. Human Mutation, 22(4), 301–312. 10.1002/humu.10260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferlay, J. , Soerjomataram, I. , Dikshit, R. , Eser, S. , Mathers, C. , Rebelo, M. , … Bray, F. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer, 136(5), E359–386. 10.1002/ijc.29210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitzmaurice, C. , Dicker, D. , Pain, A. , Hamavid, H. , Moradi‐Lakeh, M. , MacIntyre, M. F. , … Naghavi, M. (2015). The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncology, 1(4), 505–527. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall, J. M. , Lee, M. K. , Newman, B. , Morrow, J. E. , Anderson, L. A. , Huey, B. , & King, M. C. (1990). Linkage of early‐onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. Science, 250(4988), 1684–1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamadeh, R. R. , Abulfatih, N. M. , Fekri, M. A. , & Al‐Mehza, H. E. (2014). Epidemiology of breast cancer among Bahraini women: Data from the Bahrain cancer registry. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 14(2), e176–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henouda, S. , Bensalem, A. , Reggad, R. , Serrar, N. , Rouabah, L. , & Pujol, P. (2016). Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations to early Algerian breast cancer. Disease Markers, 2016, 7869095 10.1155/2016/7869095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirotsu, Y. , Nakagomi, H. , Sakamoto, I. , Amemiya, K. , Mochizuki, H. , & Omata, M. (2015). Detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Japanese population using next‐generation sequencing. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 3(2), 121–129. 10.1002/mgg3.120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Houdayer, C. , Caux‐Moncoutier, V. , Krieger, S. , Barrois, M. , Bonnet, F. , Bourdon, V. , … Stoppa‐Lyonnet, D. (2012). Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Human Mutation, 33(8), 1228–1238. 10.1002/humu.22101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jalkh, N. , Chouery, E. , Haidar, Z. , Khater, C. , Atallah, D. , Ali, H. , … Megarbane, A. (2017). Next‐generation sequencing in familial breast cancer patients from Lebanon. BMC Medical Genomics, 10(1), 8 10.1186/s12920-017-0244-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, N. , Fletcher, O. , Palles, C. , Rudd, M. , Webb, E. , Sellick, G. , … Peto, J. (2007). Counting potentially functional variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM predicts breast cancer susceptibility. Human Molecular Genetics, 16(9), 1051–1057. 10.1093/hmg/ddm050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jouali, F. , Laarabi, F.‐Z. , Marchoudi, N. , Ratbi, I. , Elalaoui, S. C. , Rhaissi, H. , … Sefiani, A. (2016). First application of next‐generation sequencing in Moroccan breast/ovarian cancer families and report of a novel frameshift mutation of the BRCA1 gene. Oncology Letters, 12(2), 1192–1196. 10.3892/ol.2016.4739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, Y. C. , Soliman, A. S. , Cui, J. , Ramadan, M. , Hablas, A. , Abouelhoda, M. , … Wang, S. M. (2017). Unique features of germline variation in five Egyptian familial breast cancer families revealed by exome sequencing. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0167581 10.1371/journal.pone.0167581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Landrum, M. J. , Lee, J. M. , Riley, G. R. , Jang, W. , Rubinstein, W. S. , Church, D. M. , & Maglott, D. R. (2014). ClinVar: Public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Research, 42(D1), D980–D985. 10.1093/nar/gkt1113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laraqui, A. , Uhrhammer, N. , Lahlou‐Amine, I. , Rhaffouli, H. E. L. , Baghdadi, J. E. , Dehayni, M. , … Bignon, Y.‐J. (2013). Mutation screening of the BRCA1 gene in early onset and familial breast/ovarian cancer in Moroccan population. Internation Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(1), 60–67. 10.7150/ijms.5014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lou, D. I. , McBee, R. M. , Le, U. Q. , Stone, A. C. , Wilkerson, G. K. , Demogines, A. M. , & Sawyer, S. L. (2014). Rapid evolution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in humans and other primates. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 14, 155 10.1186/1471-2148-14-155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahfoudh, W. , Bouaouina, N. , Ahmed, S. B. , Gabbouj, S. , Shan, J. , Mathew, R. , … Chouchane, L. (2012). Hereditary breast cancer in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) populations: Identification of novel, recurrent and founder BRCA1 mutations in the Tunisian population. Molecular Biology Reports, 39(2), 1037–1046. 10.1007/s11033-011-0829-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Merdad, A. , Gari, M. A. , Hussein, S. , Al‐Khayat, S. , Tashkandi, H. , Al‐Maghrabi, J. , … Dallol, A. (2015). Characterization of familial breast cancer in Saudi Arabia. BMC Genomics, 16(Suppl 1), S3 10.1186/1471-2164-16-s1-s3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ng, P. C. , & Henikoff, S. (2001). Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Research, 11(5), 863–874. 10.1101/gr.176601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ng, P. C. , & Henikoff, S. (2002). Accounting for human polymorphisms predicted to affect protein function. Genome Research, 12(3), 436–446. 10.1101/gr.212802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ravichandran, K. , & Al‐Zahrani, A. S. (2009). Association of reproductive factors with the incidence of breast cancer in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 15(3), 612–621. 10.26719/2009.15.3.612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Riahi, A. , Kharrat, M. , Ghourabi, M. E. , Khomsi, F. , Gamoudi, A. , Lariani, I. , … Chaabouni‐Bouhamed, H. (2015). Mutation spectrum and prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in patients with familial and early‐onset breast/ovarian cancer from Tunisia. Clinical Genetics, 87(2), 155–160. 10.1111/cge.12337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tadmouri, G. O. , Sastry, K. S. , & Chouchane, L. (2014). Arab gene geography: From population diversities to personalized medical genomics. Global Cardiology Science and Practice, 2014(4), 394–408. 10.5339/gcsp.2014.54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wiesman, C. , Rose, E. , Grant, A. , Zimilover, A. , Klugman, S. , & Schreiber‐Agus, N. (2017). Experiences from a pilot program bringing BRCA1/2 genetic screening to the US Ashkenazi Jewish population. Genetics in Medicine, 19(5), 529–536. 10.1038/gim.2016.154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wooster, R. , Bignell, G. , Lancaster, J. , Swift, S. , Seal, S. , Mangion, J. , … Stratton, M. R. (1995). Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature, 378(6559), 789–792. 10.1038/378789a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this study are from public sources. The reference sequences (accession numbers: NM_007294.3 for BRCA1 and NM_000059.3 for BRCA2) used in this study were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information sequence read archive, NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and is publicly available for non‐commercial purposes. The clinical significance of each sequence variant is suggested based on reference to ClinVar and BIC. BIC: Breast Cancer Information Core (http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic). ClinVar: Database of mutations and their clinical relevance (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/). The NGS datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author (in FASTQ files) on reasonable request.

Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES