Abstract
Deteriorating weight loss in patients with Huntington’s disease (HD) is a complicated peripheral manifestation and the cause remains poorly understood. Studies suggest that body weight strongly influences the clinical progression rate of HD and thereby offers a valuable target for therapeutic interventions. Mutant huntingtin (mHTT) is ubiquitously expressed and could induce toxicity by directly acting in the peripheral tissues. We investigated the effects of selective expression of mHTT exon1 in fat body (FB; functionally equivalent to human adipose tissue and liver) using transgenic Drosophila. We find that FB-autonomous expression of mHTT exon1 is intrinsically toxic and causes chronic weight loss in the flies despite progressive hyperphagia, and early adult death. Moreover, flies exhibit loss of intracellular lipid stores, and decline in the systemic levels of lipids and carbohydrates which aggravates over time, representing metabolic defects. At the cellular level, besides impairment, cell death also occurs with the formation of mHTT aggregates in the FB. These findings indicate that FB-autonomous expression of mHTT alone is sufficient to cause metabolic abnormalities and emaciation in vivo without any neurodegenerative cues.
Subject terms: Apoptosis, Protein aggregation, Huntington's disease, Fat metabolism, Feeding behaviour
Introduction
Huntington’s disease (HD) is a chronic, progressive neurodegenerative disorder with no known cure. It is caused by the polymorphic CAG repeat expansion in the exon1 region of the huntingtin (HTT) gene1 which is expressed ubiquitously in human tissues2–4 and is translated into a mutated form of the huntingtin protein (mHTT), which harbours a polyglutamine expansion. HD has always been characterized as primarily a neurodegenerative disorder; however, contrary to the traditional thinking, recent studies suggest it may be a systemic disorder. In patients with HD, besides the hallmark neurological manifestations, unintended progressive weight loss is a major peripheral manifestation which further complicates this disorder5–11. Weight loss is reported to start early in pre-symptomatic carriers9,12 and becomes malignant in the later stages of the disease5,7,13. Recent studies are strengthening the hypothesis that body weight is an important factor which influences the clinical progression rate of HD as higher body mass indices have been associated with slower rate of the disease progression14,15. Besides being a robust predictor in disease progression, it also worsens the quality of life of the patients16,17. Patients experience weight loss despite having normal13,18 to high caloric intake10,12. Surprisingly, weight loss in HD doesn’t seem to correlate with chorea since it is present in early stages of HD9 where chorea is minimal and becomes severe in the later stages when patients are usually rigid and bed-ridden7,8,19,20. Besides weight loss, metabolic abnormalities characterized by increased appetite and higher food intake10,12, nutritional deficiencies13,21,22, glucose imbalance and insulin resistance23–25, hepatic dysfunction26–29, and altered leptin levels30,31 are frequently reported in patients with HD. Subsequently, several studies have suggested that weight loss in HD could be attributed to the metabolic disturbances12,25,30–34.
Ever since the characterization of weight loss and metabolic abnormalities in HD, most studies describe them as a secondary effect of neurodegeneration but due to the poor correlation between neurodegeneration and weight loss, the underlying pathophysiology is yet unclear34,35. Nevertheless, the cause of deteriorating weight loss may lie beyond the neurons since mutant HTT is expressed in an array of peripheral tissues. Several transgenic HD models expressing the exon1 fragment of mutant HTT including R6/2 mice33,34,36,37, Drosophila38, recapitulate the weight loss in HD and indicate abnormalities in the peripheral tissues influencing metabolic homeostasis like adipose tissue36,38,39 and gastro-intestinal tract33. However, whether this weight loss and altered metabolism are primarily due to cell-autonomous effects of mHTT in peripheral tissues or are an indirect effect of widespread neurodegeneration or general malaise remains inconclusive. In fact, a growing body of evidence describes peripheral tissue abnormalities such as adipose tissue, liver, skeletal muscle, gut and pancreas, in patients with HD40–43. Interestingly, weight loss in patients is accompanied by substantial loss of body fat stores6,10,44 and a recent study revealed that the fat-free mass was not significantly different between control and HD subjects while body mass index (BMI) was lower in HD subjects45. Another study has suggested adipocyte abnormalities in early-stage HD patients which may worsen with disease progression and could contribute to weight loss31. Moreover, mHTT is reported to cause wide-scale alterations in several cellular processes which are crucial to all cell types like transcriptional deregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, impairment in autophagic processes, ubiquitin-proteasome system, and vesicle transport46–48; therefore, presence of mHTT even in peripheral tissues may cause considerable damage in HD setting.
Here, we hypothesize that the weight loss and metabolic dysfunction in HD can be primarily caused by direct detrimental effects engendered by mHTT in adipose tissue independent of neurodegeneration. Over the past few decades, Drosophila models have provided significant insights in the study of human metabolic disorders like diabetes, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome49–51 given the amply analogy with mammalian metabolic organ systems and various well-conserved metabolic and energy homeostasis pathways51,52. Furthermore, Drosophila provides an excellent system for spatiotemporal expression of genes and studying their direct effects in vivo. To test this hypothesis, we employed the Drosophila fat body (FB) as it is functionally equivalent to human adipose tissue and liver53.The FB is a key dynamic organ playing an indispensable role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis and systemic growth of the organism. It performs multiple metabolic functions including energy storage and mobilization. It also functions as a nutrient sensor and in turn couples nutrient status to energy demands of the flies54,55. By selectively expressing human mHTT exon1 in the Drosophila FB, we find that FB-autonomous expression of human mHTT exon1 is intrinsically toxic and leads to hyperphagic weight loss, metabolic dysfunction and eventual death of the flies. We further find progressive degeneration of FB in these flies with a concomitant accumulation and aggregation of mHTT exon1 peptides in the FB.
Results
FB-autonomous expression of mHTT induces weight loss in flies despite higher food intake and eventual death
To shed light on the direct effects of human mHTT on Drosophila FB, we examined the effects of targeted expression of HTT exon1 with unexpanded (25Qs, wild-type) and expanded (120Qs, mutant) glutamines in the FB of flies. We expressed the transgenes selectively in the FB of the flies at 25 °C under the control of Cg-GAL4 (see Supplementary Fig. S1 for Cg expression profile) since the embryonic stage. Cg > HTTex1p Q25 (referred hereafter as 25QHTTex1) and Cg > HTTex1p Q120 (referred hereafter as 120QHTTex1) flies grown under standard conditions were aged up to 15 days and compared for body weight alterations. We found that 120QHTTex1 flies exhibited declining body weight with ageing and the females became phenotypically lean by day15 with shrunken abdomens (Fig. 1a,b, S2). The reduction in the body weight of 120QHTTex1 females was evident at eclosion (day0) and became severe by day15 (Fig. 1b; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 405.8, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 66.12, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 9.945, P < 0.0001). The newly eclosed 120QHTTex1 females displayed 11.68% decline in the body weight and this decline increased to 21.17% by day15 of age. Sibling 120QHTTex1 males also showed reduction in body weight overtime. At day0, no significant difference in weight was observed between 120QHTTex1 males and corresponding 25QHTTex1 males. However, day3 posteclosion, the body weight of 120QHTTex1 males began to decline by 10.15% and it remained less as compared to the 25QHTTex1 males throughout the indicated ages (Fig. 1c; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 111.8, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 33.96, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 3.174, P = 0.0148). We also compared if body weight of 25QHTTex1 is comparable to that of the wild-type Drosophila melanogaster. Literature survey displayed that the range of body weight of 3–5 days old wild-type Drosophila melanogaster is between 0.8–0.9 mg/fly for males and 1–1.5 mg/fly for females56–58 and the body weight of the 25QHTTex1 adults also falls within this range (0.83 mg/fly for male and 1.1 mg/fly for female 3 days posteclosion). Therefore, it suggests that the 25QHTTex1 flies used in this study behave similarly as the non- transgenic controls in terms of their body weight and metabolite profile.
Although we cannot exclude minor variations in the metabolic profile that can occur between 25QHTTex1 and wild-type flies due to the differences in the genetic background as it has been extensively noted that body weight and metabolic homeostasis of an organism are complex phenomenon that depends highly on the genetics of the organism59,60. Therefore, in order to minimize such variations in the metabolic profile, we have compared the effect of human HTT exon1 with 25Qs vs. 120Qs in transgenic flies with targeted insertion of foreign transgenes in a common genetic background61.
The insect FB is critically involved in the development and growth of the organism55. Besides the observed weight loss in 120QHTTex1 flies, we asked whether this targeted expression of mHTT exon1 in the FB has any effect on the viability of the flies. Despite the persistent expression of mHTT exon1 from embryogenesis onwards, the 120QHTTex1 flies eclosed normally with no significant lethality during eclosion (data not shown). Strikingly, the 120QHTTex1 flies showed an early death phenotype. On the contrary, no death occurred in the 25QHTTex1 flies during this time period. 120QHTTex1 females had reduced longevity with a mean lifespan of 28.37 ± 0.69 days (Fig. 1d; Log-rank test (25QHTTex1 females vs. 120QHTTex1 females), P = 0.0E + 00). Similarly, sibling males also exhibited reduced longevity with a mean lifespan of 31.60 ± 0.39 days (Fig. 1e, Log-rank test (25QHTTex1 males vs. 120QHTTex1 males), P = 0.0E + 00). 25QHTTex1 flies had a lifespan of about 2.5 months (Females, mean lifespan: 68.22 ± 0.61 days; Males, mean lifespan: 66.58 ± 0.88 days) in our hands. The viability profiles indicate that the FB-targeted expression of mHTT exon1 is an insidious event.
To investigate if hypophagia contributes to the observed weight loss in 120QHTTex1 flies, we measured the food intake of 25QHTTex1 and 120QHTTex1 flies at different ages i.e. 5-, 10- and 15-day-old (Fig. 1f,g). To measure ad libitum food consumption, we initially employed capillary feeder (CAFE) assay62. We found that the food intake of 120QHTTex1 flies tended to be higher at day5 but biological significance was not established. However, food intake of 120QHTTex1 flies was significantly higher at day10 and day15, than age-matched 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 1f; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 78) = 33.93, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(2, 78) = 6.052, P = 0.0036; age × genotype effect: F(2, 78) = 2.037, P = 0.1374). A major limitation of the CAFE assay was the death of 120QHTTex1 flies after 10 days of age when kept beyond 24 hours in the CAFE setup vials which prevented longitudinal assessment of feeding in the same set of flies. Since 120QHTTex1 flies exhibit gradual decline in their body weight and are weaker than the 25QHTTex1 and the CAFE setup requires flies to climb down the micro-capillary and actively hold itself in this upside-down position to feed, therefore, lethargy or any locomotor deficiencies will affect the food intake of these flies. Thereby, to avoid any such variances due to the CAFE assay setup, we also monitored the consumption of solid food by these flies, present on the bottom of the vials, using blue dye feeding assay. At first, groups of females were allowed to feed on standard food supplemented with FD&C blue dye #1 (2% w/v) for 2 hours in the morning (Zeitgeber time (ZT) 1–3), evening (ZT 8–10) and night (ZT 12–14). We found comparable results in the CAFE assay and the blue dye feeding assay where the food intake of 120QHTTex1 flies differed significantly from that of 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 1g; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 179) = 194.4456, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(8, 179) = 52.7689, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(8, 179) = 10.7202, P < 0.0001). The results of blue dye feeding assay revealed that at day5, 120QHTTex1 flies consumed higher food only at ZT 8–10 while at rest of the time points food consumption was comparable to the corresponding 25QHTTex1. However, at day10 and day15 of age, 120QHTTex1 flies displayed significantly increased feeding compared to the age-matched 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 1g). Interestingly, further analysis revealed that the increase in food intake of 120QHTTex1 flies was progressive with strikingly higher food consumption at day15 (Fig. 1g; Tukey post-hoc test; day5 vs. day10, P < 0.0001; day10 vs. day15, P < 0.0001; day5 vs. day15, P < 0.0001). Thereby, decreased food intake is ruled out as the factor responsible for weight loss and despite having increased food consumption, flies were unable to maintain their body weight. Hence, the specific expression of mutant HTT as a transgene throughout the development in the FB of Drosophila is associated with severe weight loss with higher food consumption and is toxic to the adult flies; phenotypes reminiscent of that observed in HD patients5,10,12,15.
120QHTTex1 flies exhibit a decline in lipid levels
As an initial step towards the understanding of these aggravated weight changes with ageing, we quantified the lipids which represent a major proportion of the stored energy in the FB54,55. We measured the systemic levels of ether extractable lipids of the 25QHTTex1 and 120QHTTex1 adults at different ages posteclosion; day0, day3, day5, day7, day10 and day15. On comparison with the age-matched 25QHTTex1, the newly eclosed 120QHTTex1 adults already had considerable lower lipids relative to body weight and further analysis showed that these lipid levels declined progressively over time and became severely low by day15 of age compared to the corresponding 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 2a; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 665.496, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 119.746, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 41.0432, P < 0.0001). Conclusively, 120QHTTex1 flies displayed a significant decline in the systemic lipid content relative to body weight with ageing while 25QHTTex1 flies maintained the levels of systemic lipids relative to body weight throughout ageing.
The Drosophila FB contains a substantial amount of specialized intracellular organelles known as lipid droplets. Lipid droplets store lipids primarily in the form of triglycerides55. In line with the systemic depletion of lipids, we measured the lipid droplet distribution in the abdominal FB of adults with ageing. The lipid droplets of the abdominal FB cells were visualised using Nile red staining in both 25QHTTex1 and 120QHTTex1 flies. Adults were analyzed for lipid droplet distribution in the abdominal FB cells at the ages indicated above. Notably, we found a visible depletion of the lipid droplets in the FB cells of 120QHTTex1 flies by day10 (Fig. 2b). Upon quantification, no significant depletion in the lipid droplets was observed until day7 in 120QHTTex1 flies when compared with the age-matched 25QHTTex1. However, the FB of 120QHTTex1 flies had significantly fewer and smaller lipid droplets at day10 and day15 compared with the corresponding 25QHTTex1 flies (Fig. 2c; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 41.02, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 9.442, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 16.33, P < 0.0001). Altogether, our observations indicate that there is a chronic decline in the whole-body lipid levels along with the substantial depletion of lipids in the FB cells of 120QHTTex1 flies.
120QHTTex1 flies exhibit gradual decline in carbohydrates
We sought to determine the effect on other energy biomolecules as well. In Drosophila, besides lipids, glycogen is another important energy reserve stored in the FB. Glycogen, stored in the FB, is converted to hemolymph trehalose in response to the animal energy demands54,55. Circulating trehalose acts as a homeostatic biomolecule originating from the FB. Thereby, we assessed the levels of these two carbohydrates, namely, glycogen and trehalose in our flies with ageing. We found significant age-dependent alterations in the systemic levels of glycogen as well as trehalose in 120QHTTex1 flies compared to the corresponding 25QHTTex1 flies. At day0, the glycogen levels were comparable in the 120QHTTex1 and 25QHTTex1 flies. The decline in the systemic glycogen levels of 120QHTTex1 flies initiated 3 days posteclosion and the levels declined progressively thereafter (Fig. 3a; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 90.7, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 82.07, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 4.517, P = 0.0019). Similar pattern was observed in the trehalose levels of the 120QHTTex1 flies. Systemic decline in trehalose levels was evident at day3 and severe at the later ages compared with the age-matched 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 3b; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 217, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 90.12, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 16.34, P < 0.0001). On the contrary, 25QHTTex1 flies maintained higher levels of carbohydrates with ageing. Therefore, 120QHTTex1 flies displayed an accelerated decline in the systemic levels of carbohydrates relative to body weight and the decline was consistent with the gradual weight loss.
Abnormal levels of water and protein in 120QHTTex1 flies
Body weight management is a complex phenomenon. In addition to carbohydrates and lipids, proteins as well as body water content are other important physiological parameters affecting the body weight and metabolic state of the organism. Assessment of the total protein content of 120QHTTex1 and 25QHTTex1 flies revealed that it tends to remain relatively constant, without normalization, throughout the indicated ages. However, relative to body weight, total protein content of 120QHTTex1 flies was found to be higher at several time points in comparison to age-matched 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 4a; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 72.71, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 64.89, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 3.306, P = 0.0121). Moreover, 120QHTTex1 flies, exhibited a modest, yet significant, increase in internal water content compared to the age-matched 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 4b; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 48) = 1260, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(5, 48) = 609.3, P < 0.0001; age × genotype effect: F(5, 48) = 112, P < 0.0001). Taken together, systemic protein and water content was higher in 120QHTTex1 flies indicating that unlike other energy biomolecules, hydration and protein levels are not specifically declining in this setting.
mHTT forms inclusions in the FB cells in vivo
mHTT has been well reported to form intracellular inclusions63–65. The formation of intraneuronal inclusions of mHTT and the potential role of mHTT aggregates in HD has been the centre of attention for the last two decades. Hence, to further extend our understanding of these metabolic disturbances occurring in 120QHTTex1 flies relative to mHTT behaviour, we investigated the propensity of mHTT exon1 peptide to form aggregates in the Drosophila FB. By immunohistochemistry using N-terminal specific anti-huntingtin antibody (VB3130, human HTT N2–17 specific antibody), the huntingtin-containing inclusions were detected in the abdominal FB cells of 120QHTTex1 adults (Fig. 5a, right panel). In the 25QHTTex1 flies, no accumulation of unexpanded HTT exon1 peptides was observed over time (Fig. 5a, left panel).
In order to determine the natural history of mHTT aggregation, abdominal FBs from 0-, 3-, 5-, 7-, 10- and 15-days old 120QHTTex1 flies was immunostained and analyzed. Interestingly, we found the presence of small yet distinct mHTT aggregates along with amorphous forms at day3 (Fig. 5a, right panel) by the time adult FB is fully developed66,67. Further examination at aforementioned ages was done by plotting the intensity profiles of HTT (black) and DAPI (gray) versus position in the FB using NIH ImageJ software (Fig. 5b). The plot profiles revealed that the intensity of HTT signal is relatively low at day0 and much stronger at day10 with the intensity of DAPI signal being comparable at all of the ages. The intensity of HTT signal follows a similar pattern from day3 to day7. At day15, the HTT as well as DAPI signal showed higher fluctuation reflecting lack of tissue in certain regions. Subsequently, to quantify the number of apparent aggregates in the FB, we employed ‘3D Object Counter’ plug-in in the NIH ImageJ software. This analysis strengthened the conclusion that the mHTT exon1 forms aggregates in the abdominal FB of 120QHTTex1 flies (Fig. 5c). The FB isolated from 25QHTTex1 flies displayed negligible objects throughout the indicated ages. The number of aggregates per cell in the FB from day0 old 120QHTTex1 flies was statistically indistinguishable from that of the day0 old 25QHTTex1 FB reinforcing the fact that the adult FB has not yet fully developed. However, at all other ages i.e. day3 to day15, the FB cells of 120QHTTex1 flies exhibited significantly higher number of aggregates compared to the FB cells of age-matched 25QHTTex1 flies (Fig. 5c).
mHTT induces cell death in the FB of flies
mHTT is reported to cause progressive degeneration and death of neurons majorly in the cortico-striatal circuits68,69. Thereby, we further extended our study by examining the fate of FB cells in vivo. Surprisingly, microscopic examination of the adult FB tissue of 120QHTTex1 flies revealed clear signs of tissue degeneration (Fig. 6a). Further assessment of the tissue loss was done by acridine orange (AO) staining which specifically labels the apoptotic cells70. AO staining revealed prominent cell death in the abdominal FB cells of 120QHTTex1 flies (Fig. 6b). During early ages i.e. up to day3, AO signal was not detected in the abdominal FB cells of 120QHTTex1 flies. However, tissue degeneration along with death of the cells was evident after 5 days posteclosion. Strong AO signal was observed in many regions of the abdominal FB in day7 old 120QHTTex1 flies compared to the age-matched 25QHTTex1 and interestingly, by day10, FB showed higher proportion of AO positive regions implying extensive death in the tissue (Fig. 6c; two-factor ANOVA; genotype main effect: F(1, 51) = 59.59, P < 0.0001; age main effect: F(4, 51) = 2.964, P = 0.0281; age × genotype effect: F(4, 51) = 3.305, P = 0.0175). Along with the evident cell death signal, microscopic examination revealed that the abdomen of 120QHTTex1 flies began to lose the FB by day10 posteclosion (Fig. 6a,b). In addition, TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) of the abdominal FB of 25QHTTex1 and 120QHTTex1 flies also revealed induction of cell death in the FB of 120QHTTex1 flies. A remarkably large proportion of TUNEL-labelled nuclei were detected in the FB of day15 old 120QHTTex1 flies, as compared to the 25QHTTex1 (Fig. 6d,e; day 15, P = 0.0090113; Student’s t test with unequal variances). In contrast, negligible TUNEL-labelled nuclei were detected in the day5 old FB of 120QHTTex1 flies (Fig. 6d).Taken together, both with AO and TUNEL assay, our results suggest that the accumulation of mHTT in the FB induced cell death in vivo possibly via apoptosis.
Discussion
Unintended weight loss in patients is a complex peripheral manifestation in HD. Moreover, HD patients experience considerable loss of body fat stores6,10,12,44 and metabolic abnormalities including high caloric intake10,12, altered adipose tissue function30,31, and hepatic dysfunction26–29. The basis for these peripheral manifestations remains poorly understood. To better understand the basis for weight loss and metabolic abnormalities in HD, we expressed human HTT exon1 selectively in the FB of Drosophila since the embryonic stage and assessed the detrimental FB-autonomous effects of mHTT exon1 in vivo. Notably, it has been reported that the exon1 region of the endogenous Drosophila huntingtin protein is least conserved and lacks the polyglutamine and the proline-rich region otherwise present in the human HTT exon171.
We began by characterizing the body weight changes of 120QHTTex1 flies with ageing. We found that 120QHTTex1 flies exhibited gradual weight loss compared to the age-matched 25QHTTex1. Along with the gradual decline in the body weight, 120QHTTex1 flies showed early lethality. Although, 120QHTTex1 females and males displayed similar phenotypes, females exhibited more pronounced decline in their body weight than sibling males and this can be attributed to the sex-specific differences present in the FB of the flies72,73. Like humans, where adipose tissue derived hormones act on the hypothalamic nuclei and regulate feeding74, Drosophila FB also plays a crucial role in sensing the nutritional status of the organism and communicating this information to the neuronal circuitry and in turn, regulates the feeding behaviour75–77. Remarkably, we found that food intake was higher in 120QHTTex1 flies compared to the corresponding 25QHTTex1. These flies exhibited a progressive increase in food intake over time and it was inversely correlated with their body weight. Conclusively, despite the increased food consumption, 120QHTTex1 flies were unable to maintain their body weight and resulted in hyperphagic weight loss as seen in HD patients10,12. These findings indicate that the selective expression of mHTT in FB is not just affecting the body weight of the flies but a lot more. The weight loss is thus indicative of an insidious metabolic dysfunction culminating in death, which is in line with the chronic weight loss seen in HD patients5,15.
Drosophila FB plays an indispensable role in energy storage and mobilization. It stores the energy reserves mainly in the form of lipids and glycogen and also synthesizes hemolymph proteins and circulating metabolites. In addition to the energy storage function, FB acts as a nutrient sensor and meets the energy demands of the fly according to the environmental changes54,55. In order to uncover the basis behind this toxic weight loss, we assessed the nutrient profile of the 120QHTTex1 flies. We found severe age-dependent decline in the systemic levels of two major biomolecules, lipids and carbohydrates (stored as well as circulating forms). The decline started early during life and worsened with ageing. Moreover, Nile red staining revealed severe depletion of intracellular lipid stores from the abdominal FB cells of 120QHTTex1 flies. Interestingly, systemic decline in the levels of lipids and carbohydrates was in accordance with the chronic weight loss. Nevertheless, the protein content was higher in 120QHTTex1 flies than 25QHTTex1 at several ages. Maintenance of water balance is a crucial physiological phenomenon and any imbalance in the body water levels will also affect the metabolic homeostasis and in turn health of the organism. Here, the 120QHTTex1 flies had higher body water content than 25QHTTex1 of similar ages which could be attributed to the higher feeding in response to insufficient nutrients in the body as when faced with common food/water sources, flies give priority to regulating their nutrient intake via compensatory feeding, at the expense of optimal hydration78. Taken together, these findings indicate striking metabolic abnormalities in 120QHTTex1 flies.
In previous studies with R6/2 mice, wasting typically after 11 weeks of age has been reported. Exploration of the mechanism behind this physical wasting in R6/2 mice revealed adipose tissue dysfunction36,39. Adipose tissue serves as the major storage depot of lipids as well as plays a key role in the regulation of metabolic homeostasis and in turn body weight majorly through adipokines, namely leptin and adiponectin79,80. Interestingly, lipodystrophy, loss of adipose tissue, predisposes patients to insulin resistance, diabetes and leads to a hypermetabolic state81. Circulating levels of leptin and adiponectin were found to be significantly decreased in R6/2 mice in later stages. Also, adipose tissue in R6/2 mice exhibited substantial alteration in expression of various adipogenic and lipogenic genes36. Moreover, in cultured adipocytes, expression of expanded human huntingtin exon1 (Htt-Q103) had a deleterious effect on the expression of various adipogenic and lipogenic genes36. Direct expression of Htt-Q103 in cultured adipocytes also resulted in reduced triglyceride storage within the adipocytes36. Another HD mouse model, HD N171, displayed profound thermoregulatory defects and impairment in brown adipose tissue82. Interestingly, adipocyte dysfunction has also been suggested in HD patients as when corrected for body fat mass, plasma leptin levels increased significantly with the CAG repeat size and the leptin levels were not correlated with either BMI or fat mass, unlike in controls31. In yet another study, HD patients displayed reduced plasma leptin levels indicative of impaired adipose tissue function30.
The metabolic alterations occurring in 120QHTTex1 flies may reflect impaired functioning and/or cell death in the FB. To this end, we monitored the fate of FB cells in 120QHTTex1 flies and found substantial cell death occurring in this tissue. Microscopic examination revealed progressive wasting of the tissue and it was found to be consistent with the cell death signal in FB of 120QHTTex1 flies. To our surprise, cell death was most evident at later ages, while metabolic abnormalities started much earlier in these flies. This suggests that besides cell death, functional impairment must be occurring in the FB probably due to the accumulation of mHTT. Indeed, immunohistochemistry analysis of 120QHTTex1 and 25QHTTex1 flies revealed accumulation and aggregation of mHTT exon1 in FB cells of 120QHTTex1 flies. Abdominal FB of day15 old 120QHTTex1 flies was drastically degenerated with large inclusions present in the remaining tissue. In line with our findings, previous studies in various mouse models of HD have shown aggregation in various peripheral tissues as well as in the brain83,84. The most plausible hypothesis explaining our results could be that mHTT has direct detrimental effects on the FB cells rendering them functionally impaired initially and eventually leading to FB cell death.
To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo report showing that FB-autonomous expression of mHTT exon1 peptide alone is sufficient to cause hyperphagic weight loss along with other metabolic dysfunctions in Drosophila. Our results provide a causal link between selective expression of mHTT in FB and chronic weight loss; and might have important implications in understanding peripheral manifestations of HD. If this proves correct and mHTT has such profound effects on adipose tissue and liver in HD patients, then inhibiting the pathological effects of mHTT in these peripheral tissues may be a valuable therapeutic intervention. Nevertheless, given the wide expression of mHTT in HD subjects and the involvement of multiple tissues in the maintenance of adequate body weight74, we cannot rule out the implication of other regulatory systems or an indirect signal from neurodegeneration in hypothalamus85 in the development of metabolic abnormalities and emaciation in HD. In few mouse model studies, it has been noted that selective expression of mHTT in the hypothalamus could lead to metabolic dysfunctions such as body weight changes and disturbances in the peripheral tissues like brown adipose tissue35,86. The available evidence, however, indicates the adipose tissue and liver to be the major determinants of these peripheral manifestations. Further insights into the molecular pathways affected by peripheral mHTT may shed light on the chronic weight loss in HD and might have positive impact on therapeutic interventions aimed at amelioration of HD pathology and improving the quality of life of the patients.
Materials and Methods
Fly husbandry
Drosophila cultures were reared at 24.5 ± 0.5 °C and 65% humidity on standard cornmeal/sugar/yeast media [6.94 g/L agar (Merck), 41.67 g/L sugar, 16.67 g/L yeast (Merck), 47.23 g/L corn flour, 0.278% propionic acid (Merck), 2.78 g/L nipagin (SDFCL)] under a constant 12 h light: 12 h dark cycle. Expression of human HTT exon 1 transgene containing CAG repeats of either 25Qs (wild-type) or 120Qs (mutant) was carried out by using the bipartite UAS-GAL4 expression system in transgenic Drosophila. These transgenes are inserted at the same chromosomal location61. Transgenic stocks include w[*]; M{w[+m*] = UAS-HTTex1p Q25}ZH-51D, w[*]; M{w[+m*] = UAS-HTTex1p Q120}ZH-51D61; kind gifts from J. Lawrence Marsh, UCI, Irvine, California) and fat body specific driver, collagen-GAL4 (Cg-GAL4). Virgins of UAS-HTTex1p Q25 and UAS-HTTex1p Q120 were mated with the males of Cg-GAL4 and the resulting progeny with 25Qs (Cg-GAL4 > UAS-HTTex1p Q25) represented control and with 120Qs (Cg-GAL4 > UAS-HTTex1p Q120) represented experimental flies.
Body weight analysis
Adults, both males and virgin females, reared under ad libitum fed standard conditions were aged for 0, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 days posteclosion and monitored for body weight changes. Whole body weights were measured using Citizen CM11 microbalance and expressed as µg/fly. For body weight analysis, five replicates of 10 flies each per genotype per age were used. (n = 50/genotype/age).
Lifespan assay
Adults, both males and virgin females, of each genotype were collected and were grouped into 20 flies per vial containing standard Drosophila food. Flies were maintained as indicated above. Flies were passed to fresh food vials every alternative day and were scored for survival till none remained and represented as Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves. (n = 100/genotype).
Feeding assays
Virgin females were used for all the below mentioned assays conducted in this study. To quantify ad libitum feeding in adult flies, we performed both CAFE assay and blue dye feeding assay. For each assay, flies were habituated on standard Drosophila food initially and 5-, 10- and 15-day-old adult females were used. The CAFE assay was slightly modified from the original version62 by using standard fly vials containing wet kimwipes as a water source and was soaked in water at regular intervals. A group of 4 females was placed in a vial containing wet kimwipes and two 5 µl micro-capillaries filled with liquid food containing 5% w/v sucrose solution in sterilised distilled water and 1% w/v FD&C blue dye #1. Flies were acclimatized in the CAFE setup for 24 hours before the actual start of the assay in order to familiarize the flies with the new food source. At the start of the assay, old micro-capillaries were replaced with new micro-capillaries and the flies were allowed to feed without any interruption and the feeding was monitored for 24 hours at different ages, namely, day5, day10 and day15. The vials were placed in a chamber along with a water source outside the vials in order to minimize evaporation. At least 15 vials were kept containing micro-capillaries without flies as an evaporation control. For food intake measurements, the amount of liquid food consumed from the experimental micro-capillary was recorded, and the evaporation loss was measured by measuring the change in liquid food volume in the identical vials without flies. We tested the experimental and control flies in each condition simultaneously in order to avoid any variation that could occur due to changing environmental humidity over time. (n = 56–65 flies/genotype/age).
For blue dye feeding assay, adult flies were transferred from standard food vial to a vial containing food supplemented with 2% w/v FD&C blue dye #1 and allowed to feed for 2 hours in the morning (ZT 1–3), evening (ZT 8–10) and night (ZT 12–14). After feeding, flies were frozen immediately and then homogenized in 50 µl 1% 1X PBS/Triton X-100 using motorized pestle and centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 20 minutes. Flies feeding on a standard food vial without blue dye were used as non-fed control and were harvested at same age, homogenized and centrifuged similarly. Absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 627 nm using a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer and absorbance of the supernatants from flies fed with standard food (typically negligible) was subtracted from the blue dye fed supernatants’ absorbance. The net absorbance was used to calculate the amount of blue dye ingested and the ingested dye concentration of each fly was determined by using the linear fit of the blue dye food standard curve with R2 > 0.9976,87. The feeding profile for each genotype was determined in at least two independent experiments. (n = 50–60 flies/genotype/age).
Metabolic assays
Adult virgin female flies were analyzed for different biomolecules at the indicated ages, 0, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 days. Five replicates of cohorts of four to ten females per genotype per age were taken. All measurements of the biomolecules were normalized to body weight of the respective flies and expressed as µg biomolecules/mg body weight.
Lipid quantification
Adult females of a particular age were collected and weighed to obtain whole body weight. Subsequently, the samples were dried in a preheated oven at 70 °C for 36 hours and weighed again to obtain dry body weight. Ether soluble lipids were extracted by transferring intact dried flies to corresponding pre-labelled 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 1 ml of diethyl ether at RT on a shaker. The lipids were extracted for 48 hours with three ether changes at an interval of every 12 hours. After the last ether change, flies were dried for 2 hours at 30–35 °C and weighed again to obtain lipid-free weight of the flies. The difference between dry weight and lipid-free weight was considered as the total lipid content of the flies38. (n = 50/genotype/age).
Glycogen quantification
Cohorts of four adult females were homogenized in 400 μl of 2% Na2SO4. 20 μl of the homogenate was aliquoted and mixed with 46 μl of 2% Na2SO4 and 934 μl of chloroform/methanol (1:1). The mixture was centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 10 minutes. 500 μl of anthrone reagent (0.2% anthrone in 72% sulphuric acid) (Sigma Aldrich-319899) was added to the dried pellets and the mixture was heated at 90 °C for 20 minutes88. The tubes were then cooled on ice for 10 minutes to stop further reaction and then returned to RT for 20 minutes. The absorbance was recorded at 620 nm. Glycogen concentration was calculated using the linear fit of standard curve with R2 > 0.99. (n = 20/genotype/age).
Trehalose quantification
Cohorts of four adult females were homogenized in 500 μl of 70% ethanol and homogenates were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 10 min. at 4 °C to yield pellets. Dried pellets were re-suspended in 200 μl of 2% NaOH, heated at 100 °C for 10 minutes and cooled on ice. 50 μl of the sample was then mixed with 375 μl anthrone reagent and anthrone reaction was performed as indicated above88. Absorbance was recorded at 620 nm. Trehalose concentration was calculated using the linear fit of standard curve with R2 > 0.99. (n = 20/genotype/age).
Protein quantification
Cohorts of four adult females were quickly homogenized in 400 μl of 2% Na2SO4 and 0.05% Tween 20 (1:1). 80 μl of the homogenate was aliquoted and 500 μl of chilled 0.15% sodium deoxycholate was added. The mixture was kept on ice for 10 minutes and 100 μl of 72% trichloroacetic acid was added and incubated again for 15 minutes on ice89. The tubes were spun at 8,500 rpm for 15 minutes at 4 °C. Pellet was rinsed once with 1 ml of 1 M HCL, air dried and dissolved in 1.6 ml of cupric sulphate/Bicinchoninic acid solution. The mixture was heated at 60 °C for 10 minutes and tubes were then kept on ice to stop further reaction. Absorbance was recorded at 562 nm. Total protein content was determined using the linear fit of BSA standard curve with R2 > 0.99. (n = 20/genotype/age).
Water quantification
Cohort of 10 female flies were weighed to determine fresh weight and then placed in a preheated oven at 70 °C for 36 hours and reweighed to determine dry weight. Whole-body water content was calculated by the subtraction of mass postdesiccation (dry weight) from its fresh mass (fresh weight) and normalized to body weight of the respective flies and expressed as µg biomolecules/µg body weight. (n = 50/genotype/age).
Lipid droplet staining
Abdomen fillets of minimum five females of same age were dissected out in ice-cold PBS and fixed in 4% formaldehyde/PBT for 20 minutes at RT. After fixation, abdominal FB was detached, fixed for an additional 10 minutes and washed. FB samples were then incubated for 30 minutes in freshly prepared 1:2000 dilution of 0.5 mg/ml Nile Red (Sigma Aldrich- N3013) in PBS at RT. Followed staining, samples were rinsed and mounted in Vectashield with DAPI (Vector Labs). Samples were examined under Nikon Eclipse (Ni-E) fluorescence microscope and lipid droplets quantification in adult FB was done using NIS-Elements AR software. (n = 5/genotype/age).
Immunohistochemistry
Abdominal fillets of adult females of the same age were dissected out in ice-cold PBS and fixed by rocking for 20 minutes at room temperature (RT) in 4% formaldehyde/PBT (PBS + 0.2% Triton X-100). After fixation and blocking in 10% BSA/PBT for 2.5 hours at RT, samples were probed with Anti-Htt antibody (1:5000 dilutions in PBS, Viva Biosciences-VB3130) overnight at 4 °C on a shaker. Abdominal fillets were washed; blocked again for 2.5 hours and probed with secondary antibody (AlexaFluor 488 anti-rabbit at 1:250 in 10% BSA/PBT) for 1.5 hours at RT and washed again. Abdominal FB was then dissected out in PBS and mounted in Vectashield with DAPI. Samples were imaged under Ni-E fluorescence microscope. Image analysis was done using NIS-Elements AR software and ImageJ software. The number of aggregates was counted using ‘3D Object Counter’ plug-in in ImageJ software and the threshold levels were set to 1200. All parameters were kept consistent for all the ages and genotypes. (n = 6/genotype/age).
Cell death assays
Acridine orange (AO) assay
AO staining was performed to observe cell death cells in the abdominal FB of adult females at the aforementioned ages. Adult females were dissected in chilled Drosophila Ringer’s solution and incubated for 3 minutes in 5 μg/ml AO (Himedia; diluted in Ringer’s solution) in dark70. Samples were then washed and imaged immediately using Nikon Eclipse (Ni-E) fluorescent microscope and analyzed with NIS-elements AR software. (n = 6–8/genotype/age).
TUNEL assay
Abdominal fillets of adult females of the indicated ages were quickly dissected in ice-cold PBS and fixed by rocking for 45 minutes at RT in 4% formaldehyde/PBS. Samples were then washed thrice in 0.1% PBT (1X-PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100) for 5 minutes each, followed by incubation with 1% PBT (20 minutes) and then 75% chilled methanol at 4 °C (15 minutes). The samples were rinsed in PBS and equilibrated at RT for 1 hour, incubated in reaction buffer (TdT enzyme, BrDUTPs and reaction buffer; APO-BRDU kit, Sigma) at 37 °C overnight and afterwards the samples were washed with wash buffer twice for 30 minutes each. Then, samples were rinsed in PBT and blocked in 10% BSA/PBT for 1 hour, followed by incubation with secondary antidigoxigenin antibody for 1.5 hours in dark at RT. Samples were then mounted in Vectashield with DAPI mounting media and analysed. (n = 8–10/genotype/age).
Statistical analysis
All quantified data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Error bars throughout the paper show SEM and the number of subjects is represented by n. Normality of the data was determined by Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and variance was determined using Levene’s test. For normally distributed data, analysis was performed using two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey or Bonferroni post-hoc test for multiple comparisons and two-tailed independent Student’s t test for pair-wise analysis. All statistical measurements were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 software. Mantel-Cox log-rank test was conducted to obtain statistical significance for survival through OASIS software available at http://sbi.postech.ac.kr/oasis90. Significance includes, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
P.L. was supported by a research fellowship from the University Grants Commission (UGC). We gratefully thank J. Lawrence Marsh, Professor Emeritus, University of California Irvine, for his comments on the manuscript and generous gifts of polyQ and GAL4 driver lines. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Contributions
N.A. and P.L. designed and analysed the experiments; P.L. and K.A. performed the experiments; N.A. and P.L. analysed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-46470-8.
References
- 1.MACDONALD M. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Cell. 1993;72(6):971–983. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hoogeveen AT, et al. Characterization and localization of the Huntington disease gene product. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:2069–2073. doi: 10.1093/hmg/2.12.2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Strong TV, et al. Widespread expression of the human and rat Huntington’s disease gene in brain and nonneural tissues. Nat Genet. 1993;5:259–265. doi: 10.1038/ng1193-259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marques Sousa C, Humbert S. Huntingtin: here, there, everywhere! J Huntingtons Dis. 2013;2:395–403. doi: 10.3233/JHD-130082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sanberg PR, Fibiger HC, Mark RF. Body weight and dietary factors in Huntington’s disease patients compared with matched controls. Med J Aust. 1981;1:407–409. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1981.tb135681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Farrer LA, Yu PL. Anthropometric discrimination among affected, at-risk, and not-at-risk individuals in families with Huntington disease. Am J Med Genet. 1985;21:307–316. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320210213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kremer HP, Roos RA. Weight loss in Huntington’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:349. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530280029014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stoy N, McKay E. Weight loss in Huntington’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:130–131. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200007)48:1<130::AID-ANA27>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Djousse L, et al. Weight loss in early stage of Huntington’s disease. Neurology. 2002;59:1325–1330. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000031791.10922.CF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Trejo A, et al. Assessment of the nutrition status of patients with Huntington’s disease. Nutrition. 2004;20:192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2003.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Robbins AO, Ho AK, Barker RA. Weight changes in Huntington’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:e7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mochel F, et al. Early energy deficit in Huntington disease: identification of a plasma biomarker traceable during disease progression. PLoS One. 2007;2:e647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morales LM, et al. Nutritional evaluation of Huntington disease patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50:145–150. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/50.1.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Myers RH, et al. Factors associated with slow progression in Huntington’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1991;48:800–804. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1991.00530200036015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van der Burg JMM, et al. Body weight is a robust predictor of clinical progression in Huntington disease. Ann Neurol. 2017;82:479–483. doi: 10.1002/ana.25007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aziz NA, Roos RAC. Characteristics, pathophysiology and clinical management of weight loss in Huntington’s disease. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag. 2013;3:3. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nance MA, Sanders G. Characteristics of individuals with Huntington disease in long-term care. Mov Disord. 1996;11:542–548. doi: 10.1002/mds.870110509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marder K, et al. Dietary intake in adults at risk for Huntington disease: analysis of PHAROS research participants. Neurology. 2009;73:385–392. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b04aa2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hamilton JM, et al. Rate and correlates of weight change in Huntington’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:209–212. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.017822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aziz NA, et al. Weight loss in Huntington disease increases with higher CAG repeat number. Neurology. 2008;71:1506–1513. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000334276.09729.0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lanska DJ, Lanska MJ, Lavine L, Schoenberg BS. Conditions associated with Huntington’s disease at death. A case-control study. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:878–880. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520320068017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chel VG, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in patients with manifest Huntington disease: An explorative study. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5:348–351. doi: 10.4161/derm.26135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Podolsky S, Leopold NA, Sax DS. Increased frequency of diabetes mellitus in patients with Huntington’s chorea. Lancet. 1972;1:1356–1358. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(72)91092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Podolsky S, Leopold NA. Abnormal glucose tolerance and arginine tolerance tests in Huntington’s disease. Gerontology. 1977;23:55–63. doi: 10.1159/000212174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lalic NM, et al. Glucose homeostasis in Huntington disease: abnormalities in insulin sensitivity and early-phase insulin secretion. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:476–480. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.4.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stuwe SH, et al. Hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction in manifest and premanifest Huntington disease. Neurology. 2013;80:743–746. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318282514e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hoffmann R, et al. Progressive hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction in premanifest Huntington’s disease. Mov Disord. 2014;29:831–834. doi: 10.1002/mds.25862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Josefsen K, et al. Reduced gluconeogenesis and lactate clearance in Huntington’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;40:656–662. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chiang MC, et al. Dysregulation of C/EBPalpha by mutant Huntingtin causes the urea cycle deficiency in Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:483–498. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Popovic V, et al. Circulating and cerebrospinal fluid ghrelin and leptin: potential role in altered body weight in Huntington’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151:451–455. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1510451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aziz NA, et al. Leptin secretion rate increases with higher CAG repeat number in Huntington’s disease patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2010;73:206–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03661.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goodman AO, et al. The metabolic profile of early Huntington’s disease–a combined human and transgenic mouse study. Exp Neurol. 2008;210:691–698. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.van der Burg JM, et al. Gastrointestinal dysfunction contributes to weight loss in Huntington’s disease mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2011;44:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van der Burg JM, et al. Increased metabolism in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;29:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hult S, et al. Mutant huntingtin causes metabolic imbalance by disruption of hypothalamic neurocircuits. Cell Metab. 2011;13:428–439. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Phan J, Hickey MA, Zhang P, Chesselet MF, Reue K. Adipose tissue dysfunction tracks disease progression in two Huntington’s disease mouse models. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:1006–1016. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mangiarini L, et al. Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell. 1996;87:493–506. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Aditi K, Shakarad MN, Agrawal N. Altered lipid metabolism in Drosophila model of Huntington’s disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31411. doi: 10.1038/srep31411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fain JN, Del Mar NA, Meade CA, Reiner A, Goldowitz D. Abnormalities in the functioning of adipocytes from R6/2 mice that are transgenic for the Huntington’s disease mutation. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:145–152. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.2.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Carroll JB, Bates GP, Steffan J, Saft C, Tabrizi SJ. Treating the whole body in Huntington’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:1135–1142. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sassone J, Colciago C, Cislaghi G, Silani V, Ciammola A. Huntington’s disease: the current state of research with peripheral tissues. Exp Neurol. 2009;219:385–397. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.van der Burg JM, Bjorkqvist M, Brundin P. Beyond the brain: widespread pathology in Huntington’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:765–774. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70178-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gardiner SL, et al. Bioenergetics in fibroblasts of patients with Huntington disease are associated with age at onset. Neurol Genet. 2018;4:e275. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Farrer LA, Meaney FJ. An anthropometric assessment of Huntington’s disease patients and families. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985;67:185–194. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330670304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sussmuth SD, et al. Fat-free mass and its predictors in Huntington’s disease. J Neurol. 2015;262:1533–1540. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7753-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Saudou F, Humbert S. The Biology of Huntingtin. Neuron. 2016;89:910–926. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Labbadia J, Morimoto RI. Huntington’s disease: underlying molecular mechanisms and emerging concepts. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;38:378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li SH, Li XJ. Huntingtin-protein interactions and the pathogenesis of Huntington’s disease. Trends Genet. 2004;20:146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Graham P, Pick L. Drosophila as a Model for Diabetes and Diseases of Insulin Resistance. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2017;121:397–419. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Baker KD, Thummel CS. Diabetic larvae and obese flies-emerging studies of metabolism in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 2007;6:257–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Owusu-Ansah E, Perrimon N. Modeling metabolic homeostasis and nutrient sensing in Drosophila: implications for aging and metabolic diseases. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7:343–350. doi: 10.1242/dmm.012989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rajan A, Perrimon N. Of flies and men: insights on organismal metabolism from fruit flies. BMC Biol. 2013;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-11-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Canavoso LE, Jouni ZE, Karnas KJ, Pennington JE, Wells MA. Fat metabolism in insects. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:23–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang Y, Xi Y. Fat Body Development and its Function in Energy Storage and Nutrient Sensing in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Tissue. Sci. Eng. 2015;6:141. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Arrese EL, Soulages JL. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:207–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Katz AJ, Young SS. Selection for high adult body weight in Drosophila populations with different structures. Genetics. 1975;81:163–75. doi: 10.1093/genetics/81.1.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tiefenböck SK, Baltzer C, Egli NA, Frei C. The Drosophila PGC1 homologue Spargel coordinates mitochondrial activity to insulin signaling. EMBO J. 2010;29:171–183. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Testa ND, Ghosh SM, Shingleton AW. Sex-Specific Weight Loss Mediates Sexual Size Dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. PLOS One. 2013;8:e58936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Barsh GS, Farooqi IS, O’Rahilly S. Genetics of body-weight regulation. Nature. 2000;404:644–51. doi: 10.1038/35007519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jumbo-Lucioni P, et al. Systems genetics analysis of body weight and energy metabolism traits in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:297. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Barbaro BA, et al. Comparative study of naturally occurring huntingtin fragments in Drosophila points to exon 1 as the most pathogenic species in Huntington’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015;24:913–925. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ja WW, et al. Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:8253–8256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702726104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gutekunst CA, et al. Nuclear and neuropil aggregates in Huntington’s disease: relationship to neuropathology. J Neurosci. 1999;19:2522–2534. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02522.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.DiFiglia M, et al. Aggregation of huntingtin in neuronal intranuclear inclusions and dystrophic neurites in brain. Science. 1997;277:1990–1993. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5334.1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Scherzinger E, et al. Huntingtin-encoded polyglutamine expansions form amyloid-like protein aggregates in vitro and in vivo. Cell. 1997;90:549–558. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80514-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hoshizaki, D. K., Gibbs, A. G. & Bond, N. D. Fat body in The Insects: Structure and Function (ed. Simpson, S. J. & Douglas, A. E.) 5th edition. 132–145 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
- 67.Hoshizaki DK, Lunz R, Ghosh M, Johnson W. Identification of fat-cell enhancer activity in Drosophila melanogaster using P-element enhancer traps. Genome. 1995;38:497–506. doi: 10.1139/g95-065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ross CA, Tabrizi SJ. Huntington’s disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:83–98. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70245-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Vonsattel JP, DiFiglia M. Huntington disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57:369–384. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199805000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Arama E, Steller H. Detection of apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling and acridine orange in Drosophila embryos and adult male gonads. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1725–1731. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Li Z, Karlovich CA, Fish MP, Scott MP, Myers RM. A putative Drosophila homolog of the Huntington’s disease gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:1807–15. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.9.1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mathews KW, Cavegn M, Zwicky M. Sexual Dimorphism of Body Size Is Controlled by Dosage of the X-Chromosomal Gene Myc and by the Sex-Determining Gene tra in Drosophila. Genetics. 2017;205:1215–1228. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.192260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rideout EJ, Narsaiya MS, Grewal SS. The Sex Determination Gene transformer Regulates Male-Female Differences in Drosophila Body Size. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Jequier E, Tappy L. Regulation of body weight in humans. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:451–480. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.2.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rajan A, Perrimon N. Drosophila cytokine unpaired 2 regulates physiological homeostasis by remotely controlling insulin secretion. Cell. 2012;151:123–137. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Xu K, Zheng X, Sehgal A. Regulation of feeding and metabolism by neuronal and peripheral clocks in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 2008;8:289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kim DH, Shin M, Jung SH, Kim YJ, Jones WD. A fat-derived metabolite regulates a peptidergic feeding circuit in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2000532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ja WW, et al. Water- and nutrient-dependent effects of dietary restriction on Drosophila lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18633–18637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908016106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ahima RS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14(Suppl 5):242S–249S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Trujillo ME, Scherer PE. Adipose tissue-derived factors: impact on health and disease. Endocr Rev. 2006;27:762–778. doi: 10.1210/er.2006-0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Garg A. Acquired and inherited lipodystrophies. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1220–1234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra025261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Weydt P, et al. Thermoregulatory and metabolic defects in Huntington’s disease transgenic mice implicate PGC-1alpha in Huntington’s disease neurodegeneration. Cell Metab. 2006;4:349–362. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Moffitt H, McPhail GD, Woodman B, Hobbs C, Bates GP. Formation of polyglutamine inclusions in a wide range of non-CNS tissues in the HdhQ150 knock-in mouse model of Huntington’s disease. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Sathasivam K, et al. Formation of polyglutamine inclusions in non-CNS tissue. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:813–822. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.5.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Aziz NA, Swaab DF, Pijl H, Roos RA. Hypothalamic dysfunction and neuroendocrine and metabolic alterations in Huntington’s disease: clinical consequences and therapeutic implications. Rev Neurosci. 2007;18:223–251. doi: 10.1515/REVNEURO.2007.18.3-4.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Soylu-Kucharz R, Adlesic N, Baldo B, Kirik D, Petersén Å. Hypothalamic overexpression of mutant huntingtin causes dysregulation of brown adipose tissue. Sci Rep. 2015;30:5–14598. doi: 10.1038/srep14598.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Deshpande SA, et al. Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology. Nat Methods. 2014;11:535–540. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Xu X, et al. Insulin signaling regulates fatty acid catabolism at the level of CoA activation. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ngo, A. N., Ezoulin, M. J., Youm, I. & Youan, B. B. Optimal Concentration of 2,2,2-Trichloroacetic Acid for Protein Precipitation Based on Response Surface Methodology. J Anal Bioanal Tech5, 10.4172/2155-9872.1000198 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 90.Yang JS, et al. OASIS: online application for the survival analysis of lifespan assays performed in aging research. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.