1. Strong points
-
•
Based on the family health strategy (ESF)
-
•
Integrality of attention
-
•
Welcome (accessibility)
-
•
Family and community approach (link)
-
•
Health promotion
-
•
Risk and aggravation prevention (follow-up of chronic diseases as hypertension and diabetes)
-
•
Humanization and social participation
2. Weak points
-
•
Insufficient financing
-
•
Disharmony between vocational training and the primary health care mode
-
•
Precarization of professional link
-
•
Deficiency of intersectant sharing
-
•
Permanent education
3. Opportunities
-
•
Integrated network assistance
-
•
Active search of cases
-
•
Domiciliary assistance
-
•
Health education
-
•
Assistential planning (pregnant care, puericulture, follow-up of chronic diseases)
-
•
Expanding the possibilities of offering services for peripheral and rural areas
4. Threats
-
•
Equity in the provision of services
-
•
Reorientation of the health care model
-
•
Financing
-
•
Expansion and qualification of Family Health Strategy(ESF) in the primary care of medium and long-term health
-
•
Quality of access
-
•
Less effective epidemiological surveillance for identification of infectious diseases (Zica, Chikunya and Dengue)
5. Results achieved
-
•
Health technology (example: Electronic form)
-
•
Consolidation of the Single Health System (SHS)
-
•
Complexity and challenges found by public managers
-
•
Decentralization of primary care
-
•
Health program at school as articulation between health and education
-
•
Reduction of child and maternal mortality
-
•
Free HIV/AIDS treatment to take on the increasing cases
Footnotes
Provenance: Synopsis of the speech at the forum. Not peer reviewed.
