Abstract
Background: Burns is one of the most important health issues as well as the most expensive injuries that take place at all ages. It also considers a disaster for society, family, and person. The aim of the study was to examining fatal burns and associated factors’ in burn unit patients in Iran. Methods: a case-control study was carried out in the poorest region of Iran. The research population consisted of all patients in a burn unit in Zahedan public hospital during 2013-2018. Using systematic random sampling method, 430 persons (215 dead persons, 215 released persons) were entered into the study. The data form and SPSS software were used for data gathering and the data analyzing, respectively. Results: about 41.4% of dead patients were at the age of 25-44 and 60.5% of dead patients were women. Also, 96.3% of expired patients were on level 3 burns. The cause of the burns in 46% of death was flame, oil, and gasoline. Moreover, there is a significant relationship between burns and the age, gender, residence place, history of the previous disease, the cause of burns, burns percentage and the burn level in both case and control group. Conclusion: in the poorest region of Iran, younger (as the labor force) and women were at high risk of death due to burn. Developing gas infrastructures in this region could decrease the incidence and severity of burns.
Keywords: Mortality, burns, iran
Introduction
Burns is a type of skin injury caused by heat, chemical, friction or radiation and is considered as a beginning of a disaster for society, family and person [1,2]. Burns and injuries resulting from it are one of the most important health issues as well as one of the most expensive injuries that take place at all ages [3,4]. This complication is one of the most causes of death and disability in the world which leads to the increasing death in the world and has increased from 280000 in 1990 to 338000 in 2010 [5,6]. Burns in the United States are the third cause of death after accidents and drowning as well as the sixth cause of death in Iran [7]. According to the statistics in the United States, there are about 2 million burns incident takes place annually from which 3000 persons die and in Iran, there are about 724000 burns from which 2920 die [8,9].
Everyday burns threaten humans in different forms; in such a way that the most important of them in terms of incident causes consist of thermal, chemical or electrical burns, burns with boiling water, oil, steam, and hot thing, respectively [10,11]. The results of different studies have shown that factors such as age, social support, and education, social, emotional and economic status are effective in the incident of this injury [12]. Factors that increase burns mortality include self-burning, burning rate, and inhalation waste; in such a way that the considerable number of burns and the death resulted from it are related to fire [13,14]. The existed data of burns inpatient in all over the world show that the incidence of burns due to fire and boiling water was about 0.1 to 0.3 and for self-burning with fire and boiling water is 3 to 10 percent. The average level of the burned body in the fire attack or boiling water is about 20 percent [15]. In general, 95 percent of deaths resulted from burns took place in low and moderate income countries which because of lack of access to specialized care, more complications, disability and mortality of the victims in these regions threaten the victims [13]. In developed countries, smoking and alcohol are the main cause of conflagration in homes. For example, smoking alone is responsible for 28 percent of fatal burns in the United States [16].
So, for proper and successful planning, in order to prevent burns and reduce its complications and mortality resulted from it, it is essential to have accurate information about burns epidemiology. By having required and enough information, it is possible to allocate the material and human resources as well as make more effective efforts to improve the situation [13].
It is necessary to identify the factors associated with fatal burns and also present it in order to improve the performance of burn unit of hospitals as well as take preventive measures to prevent or reduce the death of these patients in the society. And since so far a study with this title has not been conducted in Zahedan, a study was carried out with the aim of examining epidemiological fatal burns and factors associated with it in burn unit patients in a public hospital in Zahedan during 2013-2018.
Methods
A case-control study was done on burned patient between 2013-2018 in a hospital in Sistan and Baluchestan province (as the poorest region of Iran). In this study, the entry criterion was the medical profile of the patients who were afflicted with burns at all ages and the exit criterion was an incomplete medical profile of the patients who were afflicted with burns and had no complete access to the information they needed.
The required sampling size was determined using the following formula and considering a confidence level of 95 percent. Thus, 215 dead persons were estimated for the case group and 228 released persons were calculated for the control group (the difference in the number had been due to the use of systematic random sampling method). Considering that the frequency of self-burning in the study carried out by Amir Alavi et al. under the title of “Epidemiology and burns consequences in patients afflicted with burns in Gilan Province” was about 0.5, it was used as the considered p in the sampling size formula.
n = (z1-α/2+z1-β)[p1(1-p1)+p2(1-p2)]/(p1-p2)2
n = 7.8*[.21+.2059]/(.7-.29)2 = 200
α = .05; Z1-α/2 = 1.96; β = .2; Z1-β =.84; P1 = .7; P2 = 0.29.
In this study, the medical profile of patients was studied by systematic random sampling. Out of 2062 cases of burns patients, 1631 patients were released and 431 of patients died. Considering that the sampling size was 200 persons in each group, the released and dead persons in each year separately were identified with the fitness table. In order to select the profiles of dead patients, the ratio of the number of the dead persons in each year was used on the obtained sampling size for the dead persons in the same year which the ratio for the dead persons was estimated to 2. And the profiles were selected every two in a randomly systematic way and the data were extracted. Furthermore, to select the profiles of the released patients the ratio of the number of released patients in every year was used on the obtained sampling size for the released patients in the same year which was estimated 8 for the released patients. Thus the profiles were selected every eight and the data were extracted and SPSS software and chi-square test were used.
Results
In this study, 41.4% of the dead burn patients were at the age of 25-44. Most of the dead patients were women (60.5%) and married (53%). Most of the dead patients lived in the urban area (76.3%) and had previous disease history (89.3%). According to the results, there is a meaningful relationship between burns and the variable of age and gender of the studied patients in case and control group (P = 0.000). There is also a meaningful relationship between burns and patients’ residence place in case and control group (P=0.048). There is a meaningful relationship between burns and the history of the patient’s previous disease in case and control group (P=0.034) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Frequency distribution of burns according to the demographic variables in case and control case groups at burn unit patients in a public hospital at Sistan and Baluchestan
Variables | Discharge | Dead | Total | P-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | |||
Age | ≤5 years | 54 | 23/7 | 8 | 3/7 | 62 | 14 | 0/000 |
6-14 years | 22 | 9/6 | 13 | 6 | 35 | 7/9 | ||
15-24 years | 44 | 19/3 | 85 | 39/5 | 129 | 29/1 | ||
25-44 years | 88 | 38/6 | 89 | 41/4 | 177 | 40 | ||
≥45 years | 20 | 8/8 | 20 | 9/3 | 40 | 9 | ||
Gender | Male | 135 | 59/2 | 85 | 39/5 | 220 | 49/7 | 0/000 |
Female | 93 | 40/8 | 130 | 60/5 | 223 | 50/3 | ||
Marital Status | Single | 127 | 55/7 | 101 | 47 | 228 | 51/5 | 0/066 |
Married | 101 | 44/3 | 114 | 53 | 218 | 48/5 | ||
Place of resistance | Town | 191 | 83/8 | 164 | 76/3 | 355 | 80/1 | 0/048 |
Village | 37 | 16/2 | 51 | 23/7 | 88 | 19/9 | ||
Previous disease history | Yes | 216 | 94/7 | 192 | 89/3 | 408 | 92/1 | 0/034 |
No | 12 | 5/3 | 23 | 10/7 | 35 | 7/9 |
In this study, 60.5% of the dead burned patients had burn percentage of more than 80. Most of the dead patients were on level 3 burns (96.3%). Most of the dead burn patients had a thermal burn (88.8%). Besides, most of the dead patients had afflicted with burns by flame, oil, and gasoline (46.0%). According to the results, there is a meaningful relationship between the cause of burns and the variable of burns percentage, burns level and the cause of burn (P = 0.000) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Frequency distribution of burns according to burn variables in case and control case groups at burn unit patients in a public hospital at Sistan and Baluchestan
Variables | Discharge | Dead | Total | P-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||
Number | Percent | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | |||
Burn percent | 19 per ≥ | 105 | 46/1 | 4 | 1/9 | 109 | 24/6 | 0/000 |
20-39 per | 73 | 32 | 7 | 3/3 | 80 | 18/1 | ||
40-59 per | 29 | 12/7 | 30 | 14 | 59 | 13/3 | ||
60-79 per | 12 | 5/3 | 44 | 20/5 | 56 | 12/6 | ||
80 per ≤ | 9 | 3/9 | 130 | 60/5 | 139 | 31/4 | ||
Burn level | Level 2 | 127 | 55/7 | 8 | 3/7 | 135 | 30/5 | 0/000 |
Level 3 | 101 | 44/3 | 207 | 96/3 | 308 | 69/5 | ||
Burn type | Thermal | 207 | 90/8 | 191 | 88/8 | 398 | 89/8 | 0/497 |
Non-thermal | 21 | 9/2 | 24 | 11/2 | 45 | 10/2 | ||
Burn reason | Gas explosion | 76 | 33/3 | 52 | 24/2 | 128 | 28/9 | 0/000 |
Self-immolation | 9 | 3/9 | 55 | 25/6 | 64 | 14/4 | ||
Flame, oil and gasoline | 77 | 33/8 | 99 | 46 | 176 | 39/7 | ||
Boiling water | 53 | 23/2 | 4 | 1/9 | 57 | 12/9 | ||
Others (electricity, acid, etc.) | 13 | 7/5 | 5 | 2/3 | 18 | 4/1 |
Discussion
The findings showed that most of the dead burn patients were at the age of 25-45. According to the results, there is a meaningful relationship between age and burns in case and control group. 41.4% of dead burn patients were at the age of 25-44. This issue may be due to the high risk occupations and their risk taking activities in this age group. Although, Asfhan Sharqi in his study has demonstrated that people under the age of 10 years had the most mortality rate [17], in Vasei et al.’s study in the United States, children and young adults were more afflicted with burns than the other age groups [48]. While in the group et al.’s study in Kurdistan, children, and adolescents accounted for 58 percent of the injured people [45] and most of the mortality rates in Gilan in the study done by Amir Alavi was reported in elderly [32].
According to finding, most of the dead patients were women (60.5%). According to the results, there is a meaningful relationship between gender and burns in case and control group. Furthermore, in the studies done in Kurdistan [45], Shiraz [46], Pakistan [47], Zimbabwe [48] women had included most of the burn patients, too. This may be due to the fact that women are at more exposure to flammable factors than men, they also do not have enough information about the proper use of oil products, there is no protection of petroleum products, as well as most families resident in Zahedan, do not have gas pipelines; and since a capsule is used in most homes to cook, these factors can be a risk factor for women. Sheikh Azadi in Tehran [13], Kai Yung in Chia [49] and Amir Alavi in Gilan [32] reported burns ratio in men more than women. While in the study of Amir Alavi et al., there was not found any statically meaningful relationship between gender and consequences of burns injuries.
Most of the dead patients were resident in the urban area (23.7%). According to the results, there is a meaningful relationship between the location of the residence place and burns in case and control group. This may be due to the lack of smoke alarms in homes and workplaces, gas leaks, butts, and safety negligence and in particular the use of non-standard heaters in this province. In the study done by Dr. Afshan Sharqi [17], kooshyar [50] and Kia Yung [49], the frequency of burns deaths in the city was higher than the village, but in the study done by Batra in India [51] and Amir Alavi in Gilan [32] burns mortality in the village was reported more than the city.
Most dead patients were married (53%). In this study, there is no meaningful relationship between burns and the marital status of the studied patients.
According to the findings, most of the dead patients had afflicted with thermal burns (88.8%). In this study, there is no meaningful relationship between burns and type of burn in the studied patients. It may be due to the fact that people are more involved in their daily lives with flammable agents such as flame, oil, gasoline, etc., which leads to thermal burns. Fuel smuggling in this province can be another cause of thermal burns. The results of the study are consistent with the findings of the study of Vasei et al. and the injury resulted from thermal burns is the most common type of burns.
Most of the dead patients had inflicted with burns by flame, oil, and gasoline (46.0%). In this study, there is a meaningful relationship between burns and the cause of burns. It may be due to the fact that burns with flame are deeper and in comparison with other burns they are more deadly. Besides, in Rezaei and et al.’s study, flammable fluids were the most common cause of burns in dead patients and in most cases oil was the cause of self-burning [23]. Although, in the group study in Kurdistan [45] and Sheikh Azadi [13] in Tehran, the fire has been reported as the most common cause of burns. The most common cause of burns in the study done by Afshan Sharqi [17], Kia Yung [49] and Amir Alavi [32] was boiling water and hot liquids.
Results show most of the dead patients had burns percentage of more than 80 (60.5%). In this study, there is a meaningful relationship between burns and burns percentage. According to the results of the previous studies with an increase in burns percentage, dead patient’s percentage also increases [17]. Furthermore, in Afshan Sharqi’s study, the highest frequency of mortality was due to the rate of more than 80 percent [17]. In the study done by Yavari et al. in Isfahan, the most subjects had burns 30-60 percent [52] and in the study done by Rian et al. the most burns level obtained 31 percent [11].
Also most of the dead patients had burns level 3 (96.3%). In this study, there is a meaningful relationship between burns and burns level. Since burns level 3 is very severe, the skin layers break down and enter into fat and muscle tissues and eliminate it. Besides, in the study done by Afshan Sharqi [17] and Kabirzadeh [18], the most mortality frequency was related to level 3.
Finally, Most of the dead patients had a history of the previous disease (89.3%). In this study, there is a meaningful relationship between burns and the history of the previous disease. This may be due to the fact that the underlying disease itself has been the cause of burns or exacerbation of the resulting consequences.
Conclusion
In the poorest region of Iran, younger (as the labor force) and women were at high risk of death due to burn. Developing gas infrastructures in this region could decrease the incidence and severity of burns. More attention to young burn patients and women at the entrance to hospital can reduce the risk of death. Also, development of specialized and centralized burns center, the use of sufficiently qualified personnel could play an in important role to treat patients and also reduce the complications and mortality.
Acknowledgements
The authors of this study acknowledge all the participants in this study particularly Vice President for Research and Technology and Student Research Committee in Zahedan Medical Sciences University for their material and moral supports of this project (design code: 8773) as well as the cooperation of the staff of Zahedan hospital in collecting data.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Herndon D, et al. Prevention of burn injuries total burn care. ISBN. 1978:2786–4377. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arnold Hl, Odom RB, James WD. ‘Andrew’ sdiseases of the skin clinical dermatology. WB Saunders Company. 1990;306:213–552. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sanchez JL, Bastida JL, Martínez MM, Moreno JM, Chamorro JJ. Socio-economic costand health-related quality of life of burn victims in Spain. Burns. 2008;34:975–981. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the World. Part II: intentional burns in adults. Burns. 2012;38:630–7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Altman G, et al. Fundamental and advanced nursing skills. Delmar Cengage Learning. 2009 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Barker-Collo S, Bartels DH, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bhalla K, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Boufous S, Bucello C, Burch M, Burney P, Carapetis J, Chen H, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahodwala N, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ezzati M, Feigin V, Flaxman AD, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gonzalez-Medina D, Halasa YA, Haring D, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Hoen B, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Keren A, Khoo JP, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Ohno SL, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Mallinger L, March L, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGrath J, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Michaud C, Miller M, Miller TR, Mock C, Mocumbi AO, Mokdad AA, Moran A, Mulholland K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nasseri K, Norman P, O’Donnell M, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Phillips D, Pierce K, Pope CA 3rd, Porrini E, Pourmalek F, Raju M, Ranganathan D, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Rivara FP, Roberts T, De León FR, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Salomon JA, Sampson U, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Segui-Gomez M, Shepard DS, Singh D, Singleton J, Sliwa K, Smith E, Steer A, Taylor JA, Thomas B, Tleyjeh IM, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Undurraga EA, Venketasubramanian N, Vijayakumar L, Vos T, Wagner GR, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Wilkinson JD, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Yip P, Zabetian A, Zheng ZJ, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pishnamazi Z, Kiani A, Heravi M, Zayeri F, Norouzzadeh R. Quality of life in burn patients. Faslname Payesh. 2012;1:103–110. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wall PD, et al. The pain of burns. Text book of pain. Churchill Edinburgh. 1994:402–408. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rahzani K, Taleghani F, Nikbakht nasrabadi A, Maleki rad A, Rezaee K. Quality of lifein burn disfigurement individuals as life in suffocation - a qualitative study. IJNR. 2012;7:11–22. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sharifzadeh GH, et al. A epidemiological study of patients admitted to the hospital burn Imam Reza (AS) between 85 to 1391n. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2014:21. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ryan CM, Schoenfeld DA, Thorpe WP, Sheridan RL, Cassem EH, Tompkins RG. Objective estimates of the probability of death from burnInjuries. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:362–366. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.The relationship Psychiatric Nursing between social support and image satisfaction in burn patients. Journal of Atashrazmjirandeh. 2015;3:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sheikhazadi A, Gharehdaghi J, Ghanbari M. Epidemiologic study of death due to burns inTehran, March 2005 to March 2006. Scientific Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2006;12:151–7. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Partridge J, et al. History of burns. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:103. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the World Intentional burns in adults. Burns. 2012;38:630–7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Naghavi M, et al. Epidemiology damage caused by external factors (accident) in the Islamic Republic of Iran during 1381-1382. LeavesPublications R. 2004 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sharghi A, Mashoofi M, Kamran A, Babaei A. Epidemiology of fatal burns in Ardabil city during the years 1376-1385. SID. 2009;15:252–256. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kabirzadeh A, et al. The mortality rate caused by burns 1381 in patients hospitalized in the burn center Zare city of Sari in 83 years. Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences. 2007;9:79–82. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chien WC, Pai L, Lin CC, Chen HC. Epidemiology of hospitalized burns patients in Taiwan. Burns. 2003;29:582–8. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(03)00133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rezaei E, Aghaei A. Patients who died in burn centers. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2009;52:239–243. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pishnamazi Z, Heravi M, Zayeri F, Norouzzadeh R. Quality of life in burn patients. Journal of Health Sciences Research Institute (SID) 2011;11:103–110. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aghakhani K, Mohammadi S, Molanaii A, Memareyan A, Ameri M. Epidemiologic study of burns caused by hot and cold food in a specialized burn hospital. Journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. SID. 2013;17:452–457. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rezaei E, Motamed al-Shariati M, Safari H. Study of patients with electric burn. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2009;52:107–112. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wardhana A, Basuki A, Prameswara HA, Rizkita N, Andarie A, Canintika A. The epidemiology of burns in Indonesia’s national referral burn center from 2013 to 2015. Burnsopen. 2017;1:67–73. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wasiak J, Spinks A, Ashby K, Clapperton A, Cleland H, Gabbe B. The epidemiology of burn injuries in an Australian setting 2000-2006. Burns. 2009;35:1124–32. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.He S, Alonge O, Agrawal P, Sharmin SH, Islam I, Mashreky R, Arifeen SH. Epidemiology of burns in rural bangladesh. MDPI. 2017;14:381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Feck G, Baptiste MS. The epidemiology of burn injury in New York. Public Health Rep. 1979;94:312–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tripathee S, Basnet SJ. Epidemiology of burn injuries in Nepal. Bio Med Centeral. 2017;5:10. doi: 10.1186/s41038-017-0075-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Afkhamzadeh E, Majidi F, Ahmadi CH. Risk factors for hospital infection in burn patients hospitalized in Tohid Hospital in sanandaj. Mums. 2015;59:225–232. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abdolkarimi l, Taftachi F, Hayati F, Mehrpishe SH, Seyfimoghadam N. Epidemiology of burns in elderly over 60 years old. TUMJ. 2018;76:272–276. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aghakhani K, Ameri M. Electrical burn and its complications. TUMJ. 2018;6:426–431. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Amir Alavi S, Mobain R, Toloii M, Norsalehi E, Gholipoor A, Gholamalipoor N, Mobain A. Epidemiology and burn outcomes in patients with burn in guilan province. SID. 2012;5:35–41. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liechukwu ST. Psychiatry of the medically ill in the burn unit. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002;25:129–47. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(03)00055-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Herndon DN. Total burn care. 2nd edition. London: WB Saunders; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Church D. Burn wound infections. Burns. 2006;19:9–10. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Loey V, Son V. Psychopathology and psychological problems in patients with burn scars: epidemiology and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4:245–72. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200304040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Druery M, Brown T, Muller M. Long term functional outcomes and quality of life following severe burn injury. Burns. 2005;31:692–95. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ilder Abadi E, Mortazavi H, Shoghi M, Sanjari M, et al. Comprehensive nursing books 1.6 jameh negar salemi. Tehran. 2017:53–62. [Google Scholar]
- 39.King C, Henretig FM, editors. Textbook of pediatric emergency procedures. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brunicardi , Charles Schwartz’s principles of surgery New York. Medical Pub. 2010:8. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Granger , Joyce An evidence-based approach to pediatric burns. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice. 2009:6. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rojas Y, Finnerty CC, Radhakrishnan RS, Herndon DN. Burns: an update on current pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13 doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.738195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Juckett G. Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars. PMID. 2009;80:253–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Roberts . In: Handbook of pediatric psychology. Michael C, editor. New York: Guilford; 2009. p. 421. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Groohi B, Alaghehbandan R, Lari AR. Analysis of 1089 burn patients in province of Kurdistan, Iran. Burns. 2002;28:569–74. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(02)00099-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ansari-Lari M, Askarian M. Epidemiology of burns presenting to emergency department in Shiraz, South Iran. Burns. 2003;29:579–81. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(03)00066-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Marsh D, Sheikh A, Khalil A, Kamil S, Jaffer-uz-Zaman , Qureshi I, Siraj Y, Luby S, Effendi S. Epidemiology of adults hospitalized with burns in Karachi, Pakistan. Burns. 1996;22:225–9. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(95)00114-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mzezewa S, Jonsson K, Aberg M, Salemark L. A prospective study on the epidemiology of burns in patients admitted to the Harare burns units. Burns. 1999;25:499–504. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kai-Yang L, Zhao-Fan X, Luo-Man Z, Yi-Tao J, Tao T, Wei W, Bing M, Jie X, Yu W, Yu S. Epidemiology of pediatric burns requiring hospitalization in China a literature review of retrospective studies. Pediatrics. 2008;122:132–42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kooshiar H, Amoozegar MH, Shaker MT. Epidemiology of Burns in the burn unit of Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad. Ofogh-e-Danesh. 2004;10:43–50. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Batra AK, et al. Burn mortality: recent trends a social cultural determinants in rural India. Burns. 2003;29:270–5. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(02)00306-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yavari D, Hadadi F, Abedini F. The study of hypothermia in burn patients and its relation with mortality rate hospital in Isfahan. Journal of Isfahan Medical School. 2015;33:1898–1903. [Google Scholar]