Table 3.
Trend analysis of dietary supplement use among adolescents (12–17 years) between EsKiMo I (2006) and EsKiMo II (2015–2017).
| EsKiMo I | EsKiMo I | EsKiMo II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n = 1267 | n = 1267 | n = 1356 | |
| % (95% CI) | % (95% CI) | % (95% CI) | |
| Weighted for 2004 | Weighted for 2015 | Weigthed for 2015 | |
| Total | 18.5 (15.8–21.2) | 18.5 (15.8–21.2) | 16.4 (13.0–19.7) |
| Girls | 19.3 (15.3–23.4) | 19.4 (15.3–23.5) | 18.8 (14.5–23.2) |
| Boys | 17.7 (14.3–21.1) | 17.7 (14.3–21.1) | 14.0 (9.9–18.1) |
| Type of supplement 1 | |||
| Vitamin/s | 6.2 (4.7–7.8) | 6.2 (4.7–7.8) | 6.0 (4.3–7.7) |
| Mineral/s | 9.9 (7.6–12.2) | 9.9 (7.6–12.3) | 6.7 (4.5–8.8) |
| Combination of vitamin/s and mineral/s | 6.1 (4.4–7.8) | 6.1 (4.4–7.8) | 7.6 (5.5–9.7) |
| Number of supplements | |||
| 1 supplement | 13.6 (11.1–16.1) | 13.7 (11.2–16.2) | 11.9 (9.3–14.4) |
| >1 supplement | 4.9 (3.2–6.5) | 4.9 (3.2–6.5) | 4.5 (2.8–6.2) |
1 due to multiple dietary supplement use and multiple active components, the sum of the prevalences by type of dietary supplements or active components may deviate from the prevalence of total dietary supplement use; CI = confidence interval.