Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2019 Jul 12;2(7):e198352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8352

Errors in Key Points and Results Sections

PMCID: PMC6628587  PMID: 31298708

In the Original Investigation titled “Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low Operative Risk,”1 published June 14, 2019, there was a typographical error in the Key Points section. In the Results section, in the second paragraph of the Characteristics and Outcomes of the Propensity Score–Matched Cohorts subsection, the 3-year survival rates were transposed and should have read “Three-year survival was similar in the study cohorts (85.7% vs 87.7% for TAVR and SAVR, respectively; P = .45).” This article has been corrected.1

Reference

  • 1.Virtanen MPO, Eskola M, Jalava MP, et al. Comparison of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgical aortic valve replacement among patients with aortic stenosis at low operative risk. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES