Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2012 Aug 4;30(42):6016–6019. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.056

Estimates of the annual direct medical costs of the prevention and treatment of disease associated with human papillomavirus in the United States

Harrell W Chesson 1,*, Donatus U Ekwueme 2, Mona Saraiya 2, Meg Watson 2, Douglas R Lowy 3, Lauri E Markowitz 1
PMCID: PMC6629018  NIHMSID: NIHMS397873  PMID: 22867718

Abstract

Estimates of the direct medical costs attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV) can help to quantify the economic burden of HPV and to illustrate the potential benefits of HPV vaccination. The purpose of this report was to update the estimated annual direct medical costs of the prevention and treatment of HPV-associated disease in the United States, for all HPV types. We included the costs of cervical cancer screening and follow-up and the treatment costs of the following HPV-associated health outcomes: cervical cancer, other anogenital cancers (anal, vaginal, vulvar and penile), oropharyngeal cancer, genital warts, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). We obtained updated incidence and cost estimates from the literature. The overall annual direct medical cost burden of preventing and treating HPV-associated disease was estimated to be $8.0 billion (2010 U.S. dollars). Of this total cost, about $6.6 billion (82.3%) was for routine cervical cancer screening and follow-up, $1.0 billion (12.0%) was for cancer (including $0.4 billion for cervical cancer and $0.3 billion for oropharyngeal cancer), $0.3 billion (3.6%) was for genital warts, and $0.2 billion (2.1%) was for RRP.

Keywords: Human papillomavirus, cost, intraepithelial neoplasia, vulvar, vaginal, anal, oral cavity, oropharyngeal cancer, genital warts, health economics

1. Introduction

Infection by human papillomaviruses (HPV) induces a spectrum of benign and malignant diseases whose incidence can potentially be reduced by HPV vaccination [1]. A subset of HPVs are the main cause of virtually all cervical cancers. These HPV types are also responsible for a variable proportion of other anogenital malignancies, including most anal cancers, approximately one-half of vulvar and vaginal cancers, and one-third of penile cancers, as well as a substantial proportion of oropharyngeal cancers [2]. In addition, HPV causes genital warts, non-genital warts, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). Two preventive HPV vaccines have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, HPV2 (Cervarix, GlaxoSmithKline) and HPV4 (Gardasil, Merck & Co, Inc.) [3]. Both vaccines could potentially reduce the incidence of all of these HPV-associated cancers, and one of the vaccines (HPV4) could, in addition, prevent the majority of genital warts and RRP.

Estimates of the direct medical costs of preventing and treating disease associated with HPV can help to quantify the economic burden of HPV and to illustrate the potential benefits of HPV vaccination. The purpose of this study was to update the estimated annual direct medical costs of the prevention and treatment of HPV-associated disease in the U.S., for all HPV types implicated in anogenital and upper respiratory tract infection.

2. Methods and Materials

The prevention costs we included were limited to cervical cancer screening costs (i.e., we did not include costs associated with HPV vaccination or any other HPV prevention activity). The treatment costs we included were for the following HPV-associated health outcomes: cervical cancer, other anogenital cancers (anal, vaginal, vulvar and penile), oropharyngeal cancer, genital warts, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP).

This update incorporates recent estimates of the annual number of Pap tests performed and the cost per test; the number of HPV-associated cancers in the U.S. and the cost per case of cancer; and estimates of the annual incidence and costs of genital warts and RRP. Our cost calculations reflect the lifetime costs of new cases that occur annually, based on recent incidence estimates. In addition, all cost estimates were updated to 2010 U.S. dollars using the medical care component of the consumer price index, available at http://www.bls.gov.

2.1. Costs of cervical cancer screening

The baseline estimate of the annual cost of routine cervical cancer screening was calculated as the estimated annual number of women screened multiplied by the approximate cost per screening. We assumed 52 million Pap tests are performed in the U.S. annually, with a range of 36 [4] to 65 million [5, 6]. The base case estimate (52 million) was calculated from the 65 million estimate based on National Health Interview Survey data [5, 6] multiplied by 0.80 to account for overestimation of self-reported Pap testing [5, 7], and is consistent with the National Cancer Institute’s estimate of 55 million Pap tests per year [8]. We applied $103 as the cost per screening, which reflects the average of two cost estimates: $75 for women in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program [9] and $131 for women in a large U.S. health plan [10].

The annual cost of follow-up for abnormal screening results ($1.2 billion) was obtained from a previous study of administrative and laboratory records of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest health plan [11], extrapolated to the U.S. general population. The $1.2 billion estimate is the sum of the $0.4 billion cost of follow-up of false-positive Pap tests and the $0.8 billion cost of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The annual $0.8 billion cost of CIN is consistent with an estimate of $0.7 billion obtained from a more recent analysis of medical claims data from a larger, more geographically diverse population [12]. Because we applied a total cost of $1.2 billion for costs associated with false-positive Pap tests and CIN, we did not calculate the number of women for whom follow-up was required or the average cost per follow-up. A range for the follow-up screening costs was calculated by assuming the same relative distribution as for the routine screening costs (e.g., the ratio of the upper bound value to the base-case value for follow-up screening was the same as the ratio for routine screening). We assumed all cervical screening costs (routine and follow-up) are attributable to HPV.

2.2. Costs of HPV-associated cancers

The annual burden of each of the HPV-associated cancers was calculated as the estimated annual number of cases of each cancer in the U.S. [13] multiplied by the estimated percentage of these cases in which HPV is present [2] multiplied by the cost-per-case estimates [1416]. The range of estimates for the number of HPV-associated cancer cases was calculated using the lower and upper bound values of the percent of each cancer attributable to HPV (Table 1).

Table 1.

Estimated HPV-associated cancers, by sex, 2004–2007

Anatomic area Average annual number of cases* Estimated percent of cases in which HPV is present (%)+ Estimated annual number of HPV associated cancers

Base case Range Base case Range
Cervix 11,845 96 95 – 97 11,370 11,250 – 11,490
Vulva 3,062 51 37 – 65 1,560 1,130 – 1,990
Anus & Rectum (Female) 2,977 93 86 – 97 2,770 2,560 – 2,890
Oropharynx (Female)** 2,306 63 50 – 75 1,450 1,150 – 1,730
Vagina 714 64 43 – 82 460 310 – 590
Total (Female) 20,903 17,610 16,410 – 18,680
Oropharynx (Male)** 8,936 63 50 – 75 5,630 4,470 – 6,700
Anus & Rectum (Male) 1,618 93 86 – 97 1,500 1,390 – 1,570
Penis 1,000 36 26 – 47 360 260 – 470
Total (Male) 11,553 7,490 6,120 – 8,740
Total 32,456 25,110 22,530 – 27,420

Source: Saraiya 2011 [13], based on National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

*

Defined by histology and anatomic site; Watson M et al. 2008 [27].

+

Gillison ML, et al. 2008 [2].

**

Oropharynx includes the palatine and lingual tonsils, the posterior one-third (base) of the tongue, the soft palate, and the posterior pharyngeal wall [13]. Totals may not match sums of individual components due to rounding or due to inclusion in totals of case counts that were suppressed in the individual components.

2.3. Costs of genital warts and RRP

An estimated 340,000 new cases of genital warts occurred in 2004, based on episodes of care for genital warts in a study of medical claims data [17]. We increased this estimate by 5% to account for population growth since 2004 [18] and thereby assumed 355,000 new cases of genital warts each year, with a range of 250,000 to 1,000,000 [14]. The cost per case of genital warts was set at $810 [17], with a range of $410 [14] to $930 [17].

An estimated 80 to 1500 cases of juvenile-onset RRP (JORRP) occurred in 1999 [19]. We increased the upper-bound estimate by 4% to account for population growth among youth since 1999 [18] and thereby assumed 80 to 1560 new cases of JORRP annually, with an average of 820 cases. The cost per case of JORRP was set at $150,000 [14, 20, 21], with a range of $72,000 [14] to $387,000 [20].

To estimate the annual cost burden of adult-onset RRP (AORRP), we assumed that the ratio of annual costs of AORRP to that of JORRP is 0.39 [22]. We assumed that 100% of genital warts and RRP are attributable to HPV, as HPV infection is the necessary cause of both outcomes.[19, 23]

3. Results

From 2004–2007, an average of 32,456 cases of cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers occurred each year. An estimated 25,110 of these cancers were attributable to HPV, and almost three-fourths of these HPV-associated cancers were in women (Table 1).

The overall annual direct medical cost of preventing and treating HPV-associated disease is about $8.0 billion (Table 2, bottom row). About 82% of this cost is for cervical cancer screening ($6.6 billion), of which $5.4 billion is for routine cervical cancer screening and $1.2 billion is for follow-up costs. About 12% of the total cost is for cancer ($1 billion), most of which is accounted for by cervical cancer ($441 million) and oropharyngeal cancer ($306 million). Genital warts and RRP account about 3.6% ($288 million) and 2.1% ($171 million) of the total annual costs, respectively. Excluding cervical cancer screening costs, about two-thirds of the annual costs of HPV-associated disease could be attributed to disease in women (results not shown).

Table 2.

Estimates of the annual direct medical costs of preventing and treating HPV-associated disease

Cost component Number of cases Cost per case (U.S. dollars) Annual cost (millions, U.S. dollars) Percent of cost burden
Baseline Range Baseline Range Baseline Range
Cervical screening: routine 52 million 36 to 65 million 103 75 – 131 5,356 2,700 – 8,515 67.0%
Cervical screening: follow-up NA NA NA NA 1,224 617 – 1,946 15.3%
Cervical cancer 11,370 11,250 – 11,490 38,800 30,700 – 52,600 441 345 – 604 5.5%
Oropharyngeal cancer* 7,080 5,620 – 8,430 43,200 20,100 – 61,200 306 113 – 516 3.8%
Anal cancer* 4,270 3,950 – 4,460 36,200 17,500 – 70,200 155 69 – 313 1.9%
Vulvar cancer 1,560 1,130 – 1,990 23,600 15,500 – 31,700 37 18 – 63 0.5%
Vaginal cancer 460 310 – 590 27,100 20,300 – 34,100 12 6 – 20 0.2%
Penile cancer 360 260 – 470 19,800 9,800 – 38,800 7 3 – 18 0.1%
Genital warts* 355,000 250,000 – 1,000,000 810 410 – 930 288 103 – 930 3.6%
Juvenile-onset RRP* 820 80 – 1,560 150,000 72,000 – 387,000 123 6 – 604 1.5%
Adult-onset RRP* NA NA NA NA 48 2 – 236 0.6%
Total burden 8,000 4,000 –13,800 100.0%

NA: not applicable (see text for details). RRP: recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.

Number of cases and cost per case are not presented for follow-up of cervical cancer screening and for adult-onset RRP because the total costs of follow-up and adult-onset RRP were calculated using previously-published estimates of the total costs of these outcomes. Cost per case estimates and ranges were obtained from Hu and Goldie (2008) for non-cervical cancers and from Insinga and colleagues (2008) and Kim and Goldie (2008) for cervical cancer [1416]. The source studies on which the cost-per-case estimates for cancer were based used different methodologies. Although these estimates in general reflect the cost of diagnosis and treatment of cancer, the inclusion of other cost categories (e.g., follow-up, recurrence, terminal care) varied across the source studies such that the cancer cost estimates differ in their degree of completeness.[1416] We did not include screening costs for non-cervical cancers owing to a lack of data on the number of people screened each year and/or the cost per person screened. See manuscript text and Table 1 for a description of other sources and assumptions.

*

Includes outcomes in males and females. Outcomes without asterisk are sex-specific.

Costs are reported in 2010 U.S. dollars.

4. Discussion

Our estimated burden of $8.0 billion in the U.S. is higher than, but generally consistent with, the sum of previous estimates of approximately $5 billion for the prevention and treatment of cervical HPV-related disease [7] and $0.5 billion for the treatment of noncervical HPV 6-, 11-, 16-, and 18-related disease [14]. Our updated estimate is higher than these previous estimates for three reasons. First, screening costs have increased in recent years, primarily due to the increased use of liquid-based cytology [10] as well as increases in overall health care costs over this period. Second, our estimate of the cost of oropharyngeal cancer attributable to HPV is higher than that of Hu and Goldie (2008) [14] because we applied updated, higher estimates of the percent of oropharyngeal cancers attributable to HPV. Third, we included the cost of cancers attributable to all HPV types whereas Hu and Goldie’s (2008) burden estimates included cancers attributable to HPV types 16 and 18 only.

Cervical cancer screening and follow-up together account for about $6.5 billion of the $8 billion total, or a little over 80% of the total estimated costs. This observation is consistent with findings from numerous studies that the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination could be enhanced greatly if vaccination is combined with reductions in routine cervical cancer screening costs through a delayed age of onset of screening or less frequent screening, or both [16, 2426]. Further, vaccination can help to reduce the follow-up costs of cervical cancer screening, such as costs associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Another feature of these estimates is that although RRP is a relatively uncommon non-malignant condition, its estimated cost of $170 million is greater than the individual cost of each of the HPV-associated cancers except for cervical and oropharyngeal cancer. However, there is a greater range of plausible estimates for the overall burden of RRP owing to uncertainty not only in the number of cases of RRP each year but also in the cost per case of RRP.

Our study is subject to limitations. First, there is considerable range in the estimates of the annual cost of cervical cancer screening. Second, we do not include the costs of HPV testing, which can be used as part of both screening and management strategies, as these costs were not included in the two source studies we applied for the cost per women screened [9, 10]. Third, estimates of the cost per case of HPV-associated cancers, genital warts, and RRP are subject to uncertainty. Fourth, it is difficult to estimate with precision the HPV-attributable fraction of each of the health outcomes we included in this analysis. Although we applied currently-accepted estimates of the percentage of cases that can be attributed to HPV, these estimates are subject to bias.[2, 27]

Despite these uncertainties and limitations, this study provides a useful update of the annual cost of prevention and treatment of HPV-associated diseases. This updated estimate underscores the substantial economic burden of HPV and highlights the potential for HPV vaccination to reduce this burden.

Highlights.

  • We estimated the annual direct medical costs attributable to HPV in the USA.

  • The overall annual direct medical cost burden was estimated to be $8.0 billion.

  • Most of this cost was for cervical cancer screening and follow-up ($6.6 billion).

Acknowledgments

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the National Cancer Institute. Douglas R. Lowy is a named inventor on U.S. government-owned HPV vaccine patents that are licensed to GSK and Merck, and so is entitled to limited royalties as specified by federal law.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2007;56:1–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, Lowy DR. HPV prophylactic vaccines and the potential prevention of noncervical cancers in both men and women. Cancer 2008;113:3036–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Markowitz LE, Hariri S, Unger ER, Saraiya M, Datta SD, Dunne EF. Post-licensure monitoring of HPV vaccine in the United States. Vaccine 2010. July 5;28(30):4731–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Saraiya M, McCaig LF, Ekwueme DU. Ambulatory care visits for Pap tests, abnormal Pap test results, and cervical cancer procedures in the United States. Am J Manag Care 2010;16:e137–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Eltoum IA, Roberson J. Impact of HPV testing, HPV vaccine development, and changing screening frequency on national Pap test volume: projections from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Cancer 2007;111:34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Solomon D, Breen N, McNeel T. Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:105–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Insinga RP, Dasbach EJ, Elbasha EH. Assessing the annual economic burden of preventing and treating anogenital human papillomavirus-related disease in the US: analytic framework and review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23:1107–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Gamble HL, Klosky JL, Parra GR, Randolph ME. Factors influencing familial decision-making regarding human papillomavirus vaccination. J Pediatr Psychol 2010; 35:704–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Ekwueme DU, Gardner JG, Subramanian S, Tangka FK, Bapat B, Richardson LC. Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: selected states, 2003 to 2004. Cancer 2008;112:626–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Schabert VF, Ye X, Insinga RP, Singhal PK, Riedel AA. Five-year routine cervical cancer screening rates and intervals in a US health plan. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:2429–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. The health care costs of cervical human papillomavirus-related disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:114–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Henk HJ, Insinga RP, Singhal PK, Darkow T. Incidence and costs of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a US commercially insured population. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010;14:29–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Saraiya M Burden of HPV-associated cancers in the United States Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Atlanta, GA: February 24, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Hu D, Goldie S. The economic burden of noncervical human papillomavirus disease in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:500–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Insinga RP, Ye X, Singhal PK, Carides GW. Healthcare resource use and costs associated with cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancers in a large U.S. health plan. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:188–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Kim JJ, Goldie SJ. Health and economic implications of HPV vaccination in the United States. N Engl J Med 2008;359:821–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Hoy T, Singhal PK, Willey VJ, Insinga RP. Assessing incidence and economic burden of genital warts with data from a US commercially insured population. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:2343–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2011 (130th Edition) Washington, DC, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Armstrong LR, Preston EJ, Reichert M, Phillips DL, Nisenbaum R, Todd NW, et al. Incidence and prevalence of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis among children in Atlanta and Seattle. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:107–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Chesson HW, Forhan SE, Gottlieb SL, Markowitz LE. The potential health and economic benefits of preventing recurrent respiratory papillomatosis through quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination. Vaccine 2008;26:4513–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Bishai D, Kashima H, Shah K. The cost of juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126:935–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Derkay CS. Task force on recurrent respiratory papillomas. A preliminary report. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:1386–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Lacey CJ, Lowndes CM, Shah KV. Chapter 4: Burden and management of noncancerous HPV-related conditions: HPV-6/11 disease. Vaccine 2006; 24(Suppl 3):35–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Stout NK, Salomon JA, Kuntz KM, Goldie SJ. Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:308–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Goldie SJ, Kohli M, Grima D, Weinstein MC, Wright TC, Bosch FX, et al. Projected clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:604–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Habbema D, De Kok IM, Brown ML. Cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: a tale of two countries. Milbank Q 2012; 90:5–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Watson M, Saraiya M, Ahmed F, Cardinez CJ, Reichman ME, Weir HK, et al. Using population-based cancer registry data to assess the burden of human papillomavirus-associated cancers in the United States: overview of methods. Cancer 2008;113(Suppl 10):2841–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES