Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2019 Jun 13;8:e45545. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45545

Sonic hedgehog signaling in astrocytes mediates cell type-specific synaptic organization

Steven A Hill 1,, Andrew S Blaeser 1,, Austin A Coley 2, Yajun Xie 3, Katherine A Shepard 1, Corey C Harwell 3, Wen-Jun Gao 2, A Denise R Garcia 1,2,
Editors: Dwight E Bergles4, Didier Y Stainier5
PMCID: PMC6629371  PMID: 31194676

Abstract

Astrocytes have emerged as integral partners with neurons in regulating synapse formation and function, but the mechanisms that mediate these interactions are not well understood. Here, we show that Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling in mature astrocytes is required for establishing structural organization and remodeling of cortical synapses in a cell type-specific manner. In the postnatal cortex, Shh signaling is active in a subpopulation of mature astrocytes localized primarily in deep cortical layers. Selective disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes produces a dramatic increase in synapse number specifically on layer V apical dendrites that emerges during adolescence and persists into adulthood. Dynamic turnover of dendritic spines is impaired in mutant mice and is accompanied by an increase in neuronal excitability and a reduction of the glial-specific, inward-rectifying K+ channel Kir4.1. These data identify a critical role for Shh signaling in astrocyte-mediated modulation of neuronal activity required for sculpting synapses.

Research organism: Mouse

eLife digest

A central system of neurons in the spinal cord and brain coordinate most of our body’s actions, ranging from regulating our heart rate to controlling our movement and thoughts. As the brain develops, neurons form specialized contacts with one another known as synapses. If the number of synapses is not properly regulated this can disrupt communication between the neurons, leading to diseases like schizophrenia and autism.

As the brain develops, it first forms an excess of synapses and later eliminates unnecessary or weak connections. Various factors, such gene expression or a neuron’s level of activity, regulate this turnover process. However, neurons cannot do this alone, and rely on other types of cells to help regulate their behavior. In the central nervous system, for example, a cell called an astrocyte is known to support the formation and activity of synapses. Now, Hill and Blaeser et al. show that astrocytes also exert influence over synaptic turnover during development, leading to long lasting changes in the number of synapses.

Hill, Blaeser et al. revealed that disrupting activity of the signaling pathway known as Sonic hedgehog, or Shh for short, in the astrocytes of mice led to disordered synaptic connections. Notably, neurons produce Shh, suggesting that neurons use this signaling pathway to communicate to specific astrocyte partners. Further experiments showed that reducing astrocyte’s ability to respond to Shh impaired synaptic turnover as the brain developed, leading to an overabundance of synapses. Importantly, these effects were only found to influence neuron populations associated with astrocytes that actively use Shh signaling. This suggests that distinct populations of neurons and astrocytes interact in specialized ways to build the connections within the nervous system.

To address how astrocytes use Shh signaling to regulate synaptic turnover, Hill, Blaeser et al. examined gene expression changes in astrocytes that lack Shh signaling. Astrocytes with a reduced capacity to respond to Shh were found to have lower levels of a protein responsible for transporting potassium ions into and out of the cell. This impairs astrocyte’s ability to regulate neuronal activity, which may lead to a failure in eliminating unnecessary synapses.

Understanding how synapses are controlled and organized by astrocytes could help identify new ways to treat diseases of the developing nervous system. However, further studies would be needed to improve our understanding of how this process works.

Introduction

The organization of synapses into the appropriate number and distribution occurs through a process of robust synapse addition followed by a period of refinement during which excess synapses are eliminated. Failure to establish or maintain appropriate synaptic organization is a hallmark of many neurodevelopmental disorders (Penzes et al., 2011). Considerable evidence now shows that, together with neurons, astrocytes are critical regulators of synaptic connectivity and function (Allen and Eroglu, 2017; Adamsky et al., 2018; Risher et al., 2014). Astrocytes interact intimately with synapses to regulate their formation, maturation, and function, and a growing number of astrocyte-secreted proteins that directly mediate synapse formation and elimination have been identified (Allen et al., 2012; Kucukdereli et al., 2011; Christopherson et al., 2005; Blanco-Suarez et al., 2018; Chung et al., 2015). In addition, astrocytes regulate concentrations of K+ and glutamate in the extracellular space, thereby modulating neuronal activity (Olsen and Sontheimer, 2008). Nevertheless, despite the remarkable progress in our understanding of the essential role for astrocytes in regulating synaptic formation and function, the underlying signaling programs mediating astrocyte-dependent regulation of synapse organization remain poorly understood.

The molecular signaling pathway Sonic hedgehog (Shh) governs a broad array of neurodevelopmental processes in the vertebrate embryo, including morphogenesis, cell proliferation and specification, and axon pathfinding (Fuccillo et al., 2006; Ruiz i Altaba et al., 2002). However, Shh activity persists in multiple cell populations in the postnatal and adult CNS, including progenitor cells, as well as in differentiated neurons and astrocytes (Traiffort et al., 2010; Ahn and Joyner, 2005; Ihrie et al., 2011; Harwell et al., 2012; Garcia et al., 2010), where novel and unexpected roles for Shh activity are emerging (Garcia et al., 2018). Following injury, Shh has been shown to mitigate inflammation (Alvarez et al., 2011; Allahyari et al., 2019), and in the cerebellum, Shh derived from Purkinje neurons instructs phenotypic properties of mature Bergmann glia (Farmer et al., 2016). In the postnatal cortex, Shh is required for establishing local circuits between two distinct projection neuron populations (Harwell et al., 2012). Shh produced by layer V neurons guides the formation of synaptic connections to its layer II/III presynaptic partners, which transduce the Shh signal through non-canonical, Gli-independent mechanisms. We have previously shown that Shh signaling is also active in a discrete subpopulation of cortical astrocytes (Garcia et al., 2010), suggesting that Shh signaling mediates both homotypic and heterotypic cellular interactions. Astrocytes engaging in Shh activity are identified by expression of Gli1, a transcriptional effector of canonical Shh signaling (Fuccillo et al., 2006). Whether Shh signaling in cortical astrocytes plays a role in synaptic organization of neurons is not known.

In this study, we examined the organization and dynamics of dendritic spines on cortical neurons following selective disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes. Dendritic spines are the structural hosts of most excitatory synapses and play an important role in the organization and function of neural circuits. We show that deep layer neurons exhibit long-lasting aberrations in the density and turnover of dendritic spines that emerge during postnatal development following selective disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes. These perturbations in synaptic organization are not observed in upper layer neurons where Gli1 astrocytes are relatively sparse. Chronic in vivo imaging of dendritic spines reveals that mutant mice exhibit lower rates of spine turnover, suggesting impaired structural plasticity. In addition, these mice show a pronounced deficit in expression of the glial-specific inward-rectifying K+ channel, Kir4.1, as well as an increase in excitability of cortical neurons. Taken together, these data demonstrate that astrocytes act as key modulators of neural activity and structure during postnatal development in a Shh-dependent manner and further establish Shh signaling as a fundamental mediator of synaptic connectivity.

Results

Gli1 astrocytes exhibit a distinct laminar distribution in the adult cortex

In the mature cortex, a subpopulation of astrocytes express the transcription factor Gli1, indicating active Shh signaling (Garcia et al., 2010). Notably, the distribution of Gli1 astrocytes throughout the cortex is non-uniform, showing a laminar-specific pattern (Figure 1). We analyzed the laminar distribution of Gli1 astrocytes in adult Gli1CreER/+;Ai14 mice, in which tamoxifen administration promotes Cre-mediated recombination of the fluorescent tdTomato reporter protein, permanently marking Gli1-expressing cells. Adult Gli1CreER/+;Ai14 mice received tamoxifen over three days, and their brains were analyzed two – three weeks later. In our previous study, we observed weak expression of βGal reporter protein in Gli1CreER/+;R26lacZ/lacZ mice at time points earlier than 4 weeks after tamoxifen (Garcia et al., 2010). In contrast, expression of the tdTomato reporter protein in the Ai14 reporter line shows robust expression as early as two weeks, and a comparable number, distribution and intensity of reporter-positive cells between two and four weeks (Allahyari et al., 2019). For these studies, we therefore used a two – three week chase after tamoxifen. The vast majority of marked cells were observed within layers IV and V, with few marked cells observed in layers II/III or VI (Figure 1). We performed immunostaining with the pan-astrocytic marker S100β and quantified the fraction of marked astrocytes in cortical layers (Figure 1). This analysis showed that 44% of astrocytes in layer IV express Gli1 (Figure 1), while 36% of astrocytes in layer V express Gli1. Interestingly, the distribution of Gli1 astrocytes in layer V was not homogenous, showing an enrichment of marked cells in layer Vb, and a distinctive paucity of marked cells in layer Va (Figure 1), consistent with the localization of Shh producing neurons in layer Vb (Harwell et al., 2012; Garcia et al., 2010). We analyzed the fraction of Gli1 astrocytes in each sublayer of layer V and found that 75% of marked cells were found in layer Vb whereas only 25% were found in layer Va. Layers II/III and VI showed the lowest fractions of marked astrocytes, with only 11% and 22% of S100β cells expressing tomato, respectively. These data demonstrate that Gli1 astrocytes are preferentially localized in deep cortical layers and suggest their interactions with local neurons may differ from that of Gli1-negative astrocytes in superficial layers.

Figure 1. Gli1 astrocytes are distributed in a laminar-specific manner.

Figure 1.

(A) Tamoxifen- induced reporter expression in Gli1CreER/+;Ai14 mice reveals a laminar distribution of cells undergoing active Shh signaling (red). Scale bar, 250 μm. (B) Gli1+ cells (red) are a subset of all astrocytes (S100β, green, see inset; scale bar, 12.5 μm). (C) Layer analysis of Gli1 astrocytes (red) with DAPI and the deep layer marker Ctip2 (gray) illustrate their layer-specific organization. Scale bar, 125 μm. (D) The fraction of astrocytes expressing Gli1 in each cortical layer. Data points indicate individual animals, bars represent mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. (E) The fraction of Gli1 astrocytes in sublayers Va and Vb. Bar graphs represent mean value ± SEM. n = 4 animals.

Figure 1—source data 1. Distribution of Gli1 astrocytes in cortical layers.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.004

Shh signaling is required for cell type-specific synaptic connectivity

Transduction of canonical Shh signaling begins with binding of Shh to its transmembrane receptor, Patched1 (Ptch), relieving inhibition of a second, obligatory co-receptor Smoothened (Smo). To investigate the role of Shh signaling in astrocyte function, we performed conditional knockout of Smo selectively in astrocytes using Gfap-Cre transgenic mice in which Cre expression is regulated by the full-length mouse Gfap promoter (Garcia et al., 2004) (Gfap Smo CKO). Because Gfap-mediated Cre recombination targets astrocyte progenitors expressing GFAP which are present at birth, this is an effective tool for targeting the cortical astrocyte population for selective gene deletion. We validated the Cre-mediated recombination pattern in Gfap-Cre mice by crossing them with Ai14 reporter mice (Gfap-Cre;Ai14), that express the tdTomato reporter protein. Although individual floxed alleles possess distinct recombination efficiencies, owing to specific characteristics of each allele including distance between loxP sites or their accessibility due to chromatin structure (Vooijs et al., 2001), analysis of recombination in a reporter line provides a useful approximation of the expression pattern of a given Cre driver. We performed single cell analysis of the identity of recombined cells. The vast majority of tomato-positive cells showed a bushy morphology, typical of protoplasmic astrocytes (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Single cell analysis of double staining with S100β showed that nearly 70% were co-labeled, identifying them as astrocytes. We also identified a small fraction (6%) of tomato cells as oligodendrocytes. A small fraction (9%) of tomato cells were co-labeled with the neuronal marker, NeuN, but this represented only 1.3% of cortical neurons (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Importantly, although a minor fraction of recombined cells was identified as neurons or oligodendrocytes, nearly all cortical astrocytes analyzed expressed the tdTomato reporter protein (95%; Figure 2—figure supplement 1), suggesting effective targeting of the cortical astrocyte population using this Gfap-Cre driver.

We performed qPCR on whole cortex from Gfap Smo CKO mice and littermate controls and found a 50% reduction in the number of Smo transcripts (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). As Smo is also expressed in neurons (Harwell et al., 2012), the remaining Smo transcripts are likely due to neurons that do not undergo Cre-mediated recombination in these mice. Importantly, Gfap Smo CKO mice show a nearly complete loss of Gli1 activity, with no difference in the number of astrocytes in the mature cortex, demonstrating effective interruption of canonical Shh signaling (Garcia et al., 2010). These data demonstrate that this Gfap-Cre driver is an effective tool for selective deletion of Smo in cortical astrocytes, and that canonical, Gli-mediated Shh activity is effectively abolished.

During postnatal development, Shh is required for establishing synaptic connectivity between layer V neurons and their presynaptic partners in layer II/III, which is mediated by Gli-independent, non-canonical signaling (Harwell et al., 2012). To examine whether canonical, Gli-mediated Shh signaling in astrocytes plays a role in establishing synaptic connectivity of cortical neurons, we evaluated spine density of apical dendrites on layer V neurons in the somatosensory cortex of Gfap Smo CKO mice across postnatal development. Dendritic spines receive the vast majority of excitatory input, thereby serving as a useful readout of synaptic connectivity (Nimchinsky et al., 2002). To visualize neurons for reliable identification and tracing, Gfap Smo CKO mice were crossed with Thy1-GFPm transgenic mice, which sparsely express GFP in a subset of layer V cortical neurons (Feng et al., 2000). Dendritic spines undergo a period of dynamic reorganization during postnatal development during which there is an initial overproduction of spines over the first 2–3 weeks of postnatal development followed by a period of synaptic pruning that refines the precise connectivity of cortical circuits (Zuo et al., 2005a). At P14, spine density was comparable between Gfap Smo CKO mice and wild type (WT) littermate controls, suggesting that early synaptogenesis does not require astrocytic Shh signaling (0.58 ± 0.03 spines/µm and 0.56 ± 0.01 spines/µm, WT [n = 7 cells] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 6 cells], respectively, p=0.64, two animals per genotype). Between P14 and P21, spine density remained stable in WT, but showed a dramatic increase at P28 (Figure 2). This period of synapse addition was followed by a steady reduction in spine density at P42 and into adulthood (≥P90), reflecting the developmental elimination of spines. In contrast, Gfap Smo CKO mice showed an accelerated timeline of spine addition in which spine density increased dramatically between P14 and P21 (Figure 2). Spine density was significantly higher at P21 in Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to controls (0.53 ± 0.05 spines/µm and 0.76 ± 0.06 spines/µm, WT [n = 9 cells] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 9 cells], respectively, p=0.008, three animals per genotype). Although there was a modest reduction in spine density as animals matured, spine density remained elevated in adult Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to WT controls (0.36 ± 0.02 spines/µm and 0.60 ± 0.02 spines/µm in WT [n = 24 cells] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 23 cells], respectively, p<0.0001, four animals per genotype; Figure 2). Thus, whereas WT mice experience a 49% reduction in spine density from the peak of spine density at P28 to adulthood, Gfap Smo CKO mice exhibit a 22% reduction from their peak at P21 to adulthood. Interestingly, we find no difference in basal dendrite spine density in Gfap Smo CKO mice (0.60 ± 0.04 spines/um and 0.62 ± 0.04 spines/µm in WT [n = 10 cells] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 10 cells], respectively, p=0.71, three animals per genotype; Figure 2—figure supplement 3). This is in contrast to embryonic deletion of Shh from neurons using the Emx-Cre driver, which produces a reduction in spine density of basal dendrites on layer V neurons (Harwell et al., 2012). These data suggest that while the early stages of synapse formation proceed independently of astrocytic Shh signaling, the maturing cortical circuit requires intact Shh activity in astrocytes for the developmental pruning of excess synapses necessary to achieve its mature organization.

Figure 2. Loss of Shh signaling in astrocytes results in increased spine density on layer V neurons.

(A-C) GFP immunostaining of representative apical dendritic segments from (A) layer V neurons, (B) layer II/III neurons, and (C) CA1 neurons in WT and Gfap Smo CKO mice. Scale bar, 5 μm. (D) Spine density of apical dendrites from layer V neurons across various postnatal ages and in adult mice. Data points represent individual cells, bars represent mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis performed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ****, p<0.0001. Significance is stated as Gfap Smo CKO compared to WT at a given age. (E) Spine density of apical dendrites from layer V neurons in adult CamKIIa Smo CKO mice. (F–G) Spine density of apical dendrites from layer II/III (F) and CA1 pyramidal neurons (G) in WT and Gfap Smo CKO mice. Data points represent individual cells, bars represent mean ± SEM. Statistical significance assessed by Student’s t-test. n ≥ 3 animals per genotype for all ages except P14, where n = 2 animals per genotype.

Figure 2—source data 1. Analysis of spine density.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.010

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Gfap-Cre recombination occurs primarily in astrocytes.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative image of tdTomato expression in the cortex of Gfap-Cre;Ai14 mice. w.m., white matter. Scale bar, 125 μm. (B–D) Expression of the astrocyte marker S100β and tdTomato in somatosensory cortex. Scale bar, 25 μm. (E) Fraction of recombined cells identified as astrocytes in the cortex of adult Gfap-Cre;Ai14 mice. (F–H) Expression of the neuronal marker NeuN and tdTomato in somatosensory cortex. (I) Fraction of recombined cells identified as neurons. (J– L) Expression of the oligodendrocyte marker CAII and tdTomato in somatosensory cortex. (M) Fraction of recombined cells identified as oligodendrocytes. White arrows show double-labeled cells, blue arrows show cells that express the indicated marker but are tomato-negative, and yellow arrows show single-labeled tomato-positive cells. Data points represent individual brain sections analyzed. Bar graphs represent mean ± SEM. n = 2 animals, four sections per animal.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Gfap Smo CKO mice have reduced levels of Smo.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

Quantitative PCR of cortical RNA shows a significant reduction in Smo expression. Data points represent individual animals, bars represent mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis assessed by unpaired Student’s t-test.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Quantification of Smo mRNA.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.008
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Spine density on layer V basal dendrites are not affected in adult Gfap Smo CKO mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

(A–B) Representative images of basal dendrites analyzed from layer V neurons expressing Thy1-GFPm in both WT (Smofl/fl) and Gfap Smo CKO (Gfap Smofl/fl) animals. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) Graph comparing the density of spines on basal dendrites from WT and Gfap Smo CKO animals. Data points represent individual cells, bars represent mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed using unpaired Student’s t-test. n = 3 animals per genotype.

To confirm that elevated spine density was due specifically to a loss of astrocytic Shh signaling, we interrogated the spine density of pyramidal cells in two different regions where Gli1 astrocytes are relatively sparse (see Figure 1). Pyramidal neurons in layer II/III of WT mice showed a higher spine density than layer V neurons (0.79 ± 0.06 spines/µm, n = 7 cells, four animals) consistent with previous studies (Holtmaat et al., 2005). However, this was not significantly different from the spine density observed in Gfap Smo CKO mice (0.76 ± 0.06 spines/µm, p=0.76, n = 9 cells, five animals; Figure 2). We also analyzed pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus. Although the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus harbors a population of Gli1-expressing adult neural progenitor cells, mature, differentiated astrocytes expressing Gli1 are relatively sparse (Ahn and Joyner, 2005; Han et al., 2008) (Figure 1). The spine density of CA1 pyramidal neurons in adult mice was higher than in cortical neurons, consistent with previous studies (Attardo et al., 2015; Perez-Cruz et al., 2011). However, there was no significant difference in spine density between Gfap Smo CKO mice and WT controls (0.97 ± 0.05 spines/µm and 0.90 ± 0.05 spines/µm in WT [n = 11 cells] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 11 cells], respectively, p=0.32, three animals per genotype; Figure 2). Our analysis of the recombination pattern of the Gfap-Cre driver showed that some cortical neurons undergo recombination (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). To rule out the possibility that Smo deletion in a small population of neurons is responsible for the elevated spine density of layer V neurons, we deleted Smo in excitatory neurons using the CamKIIα-Cre driver (CK2 Smo CKO), and evaluated spine density of layer V neurons in adult mice. We found no significant difference in spine density between CK2 Smo CKO mice and littermate controls (0.77 ± 0.07 spines/µm and 0.59 ± 0.06 spines/µm in WT [n = 10 cells] and CK2 Smo CKO [n = 9 cells], respectively, p=0.07, three animals per genotype; Figure 2). Taken together, these data suggest that Shh activity in astrocytes is necessary for the developmental reorganization of dendritic spines specifically on layer V cortical neurons. Notably, we observed elevated spine density along the apical dendrites of layer V neurons, which traverse layer II/III, where few Gli1 astrocytes are found. This suggests that the modification of synapse organization mediated by Gli1 astrocytes does not occur through direct astrocyte-synapse interactions.

Synapses are more stable in Gfap Smo CKO mice

Dendritic spines are dynamic structures that undergo rapid formation and elimination during postnatal cortical development. As cortical circuits mature, the fraction of spines undergoing dynamic turnover declines concomitant with an increase in spine stability (Zuo et al., 2005a; Holtmaat et al., 2005). The dynamic turnover of spines has long been considered a structural correlate of synaptic plasticity and can be regulated in an activity-dependent manner (Lendvai et al., 2000; Trachtenberg et al., 2002; Holtmaat and Svoboda, 2009; Zuo et al., 2005b). To evaluate the role of astrocytic Shh signaling in mediating spine dynamics, we performed repeated in vivo imaging of the apical tufts of layer V neurons in the somatosensory cortex through a cranial window (Holtmaat et al., 2009). We confirmed the layer V identity of imaged neurons by following individual dendritic segments to their soma and created 3D reconstructions of imaged neurons. Only dendrites with soma in layer V, typically 500 µm – 600 µm from the surface of the brain, were analyzed. In Thy1-GFPm mice, expression of GFP is developmentally regulated such that at P14, the intensity of GFP expression and the density of fluorescently labeled neurons within the 3 mm cranial window is insufficient for reliable imaging, as has been previously reported (Holtmaat et al., 2005). However by P17, GFP expression was sufficiently dense and bright to enable reliable imaging. We analyzed the fraction of spines undergoing dynamic turnover over 2 days in young mice at P17-P21 and P28-P32. In WT mice, the turnover ratio was 0.14 at P17-P21 (n = 5 mice) and 0.10 in P28-P32 mice (n = 3 mice; Figure 3). In Gfap Smo CKO mice however, the turnover ratio was lower at P17-P21 than in WT mice, and remained stable at P28-P32 (0.11 and 0.10, respectively, n = 4 mice; Figure 3). This suggests that dendritic spines in Gfap Smo CKO mice stabilize earlier than those in WT mice. Consistent with this, we found that the fraction of filopodia was lower in juvenile Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to WT controls (Figure 3). Filopodia are structural precursors of dendritic spines and exhibit higher rates of dynamic turnover than mature spines (Ziv and Smith, 1996; Berry and Nedivi, 2017). Accordingly, the density of filopodia declines as the cortex matures (Zuo et al., 2005a; Grutzendler et al., 2002). Indeed, the fraction of all protrusions in juvenile WT mice (n = 7 mice) identified as filopodia was 25%, but that fraction declined significantly to 15% in adults (n = 16 mice, p=0.0039; Figure 3). In contrast, we did not observe this age-dependent decline in Gfap Smo CKO mice (17% and 12% in juvenile [n = 10 mice] and adult [n = 7 mice] Gfap Smo CKO mice, respectively, p=0.398). The filopodial fraction in juvenile Gfap Smo CKO mice was already significantly below WT levels and comparable to adult WT levels, suggesting that nascent spines undergo accelerated stabilization in the absence of astrocyte-mediated Shh signaling.

Figure 3. Loss of astrocytic Shh signaling impairs structural plasticity.

(A–C) Example dendrite segment imaged repeatedly over 6 weeks. Day 0 indicates the first day of imaging, subsequent imaging days indicated. White arrows, stable spines; cyan arrows, transient spines; orange arrows, filopodia. (D) Turnover ratios in WT (n = 3–5 animals per age group) and Gfap Smo CKO juvenile mice (n = 4 animals per age group) analyzed over 2 days. (E) Turnover ratios in WT (n = 8 animals) and Gfap Smo CKO (n = 8 animals) adult mice analyzed over 7 days. Statistical analysis by two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test (D) and unpaired Student’s t-test (E). (F) Fraction of protrusions identified as filopodia in juvenile (WT, n = 7 animals; Gfap Smo CKO, n = 10 animals) and adult mice (WT, n = 16: Gfap Smo CKO, n = 7 animals). Statistics by two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test. (G) Comparison of spine survival curves for WT and Gfap Smo CKO neurons. Each dashed curve represents the curve from an individual mouse (WT, n = 7 animals; Gfap Smo CKO, n = 5 animals). Solid curves represent best-fits to exponential decay models. (H) The fraction of spines belonging to the stable, recurrent, and transient populations. Statistical significance was assessed by Student’s t-test for each class (stable, recurrent, or transient; n = 7 and 8 animals, WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively). Stable, p=0.0485; Recurrent, p=0.1023; Transient, p=0.7709. (I) Breakdown of spine morphology in juvenile mice. Statistical analysis by unpaired Student’s t-test for each spine class. For graphs D-F and I, data points represent individual animals, bars represent mean ± SEM.

Figure 3—source data 1. Spine turnover data.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.014
Figure 3—source code 1. MATLAB-based custom-written code for longitudinal analysis of spine dynamics.
SpineTracking generates a longitudinal tracking file that stores the x,y,z location of each feature, along with its status (missing/present/filopodia) for each tile, LongSurvival gathers all the tiles and pools the data to give the final survival curves for each mouse, and FeatLong is used for examining each feature individually.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.015

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Classification of protrusions.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A–C) Several examples of protrusions classified as mushroom (blue arrowheads) or intermediate (yellow arrowheads) spines, and filopodia (pink arrow- heads). Note the thin stalk and small bulbous head of the intermediate spine in A, whereas filopodia lack a discerible head (B and C). (D) The fraction of protrusions classified as mush- room or intermediate in adult Gfap Smo mice and WT controls. Data points represent individual animals, bars represent mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis by unpaired Student’s t-test.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Screenshot depicting the graphical user interface used for longitudinal tracking of spines across multiple days of imaging.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

A spine identified in the first imaging session (pink star, top central panel) is presented to the user for scoring. The same spine is manually tracked across subsequent days (rows). For each day, multiple frames above and below the estimated z-plane corresponding to that spine, Z0, are also presented (columns). For each timepoint, the user then clicks on the spine’s head using the frame that best captures the spine. In this case, the frame jump, Δz, was set to 1, and four neighboring frames are presented; these parameters can be adjusted as necessary.

We performed further analysis of spine morphologies and classified spines as mature or intermediate, to determine if there is an increase in mature spines. Protrusions with a mushroom-like morphology were classified as mature, and thin protrusions lacking a discernible spine head, or exhibiting a relatively dim, small head were identified as intermediate spines (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). In P17-21 mice, WT and CKO mice showed similar proportions of mature spines (54% and 55% in WT and CKO, respectively, n = 4 mice per genotype; Figure 3), however Gfap Smo CKO mice showed an apparent increase in protrusions with an intermediate morphology (16% and 26% in WT and CKO, respectively; Figure 3), though this was not statistically significant. This suggests that these intermediate protrusions reflect transitional morphologies as spines undergo maturation, and become more stable. Consistent with this, adult Gfap Smo CKO mice trended toward a modest increase in the fraction of mature spines, compared to their WT controls (55% and 65% in WT and CKO, respectively, n = 4 mice per genotype; Figure 3—figure supplement 1), whereas the fraction of intermediate spines was comparable at this age (27% and 23% in WT and CKO, respectively).

It is well established that the rate of synaptic turnover declines considerably as animals mature, reflecting an increase in stability of synaptic connections (Zuo et al., 2005a; Holtmaat et al., 2005). We next sought to investigate the long-term stability of individual spines in adult mice by imaging dendrites weekly for up to 6 weeks. We investigated the fraction of spines identified on the first day of imaging that persisted in subsequent imaging sessions using custom written MATLAB code (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). We calculated the survival fraction by fitting to an exponential decay model. This analysis revealed a larger proportion of long-lived stable spines in Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to WT control (71% and 79% in WT [n = 7 mice] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 5 mice], respectively, p=0.0068, Extra sum-of-squares F test; Figure 3), suggesting an increase in stability of dendritic spines. Interestingly, among the population of dynamic spines, we found two distinct populations consisting of transient spines, which disappeared and did not reappear for the duration of the study, and recurrent spines, which disappeared and then subsequently reappeared. Our data showed that the shift towards increased spine stability in the Gfap Smo CKO neurons was entirely due to a reduction in the proportion of recurrent spines, with nearly identical fractions of transient spines observed across both genotypes (Figure 3). These data suggest that structural plasticity is impaired in Gfap Smo CKO mice. This deficit in structural plasticity emerges during the third week of postnatal development and persists into adulthood. Taken together, these data demonstrate that astrocyte-mediated Shh signaling is required for establishing and maintaining the organization of cell type specific cortical synapses.

Shh signaling regulates Kir4.1 expression in cortical astrocytes

In both the developing and adult CNS, astrocytes directly eliminate synapses in an activity-dependent manner through MEGF10 and MERTK, two phagocytic receptors enriched in astrocytes (Chung et al., 2013). To investigate whether these genes are negatively regulated in Gfap Smo CKO mice, we examined their expression in the cortex of adult mice by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Expression of both Mertk and Megf10 was comparable between WT and Gfap Smo CKO mice (dCq values, Mertk: 5.97 ± 0.23 and 5.87 ± 0.06 in WT [n = 3 mice] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 6 mice], respectively, p=0.54; Megf10: 8.02 ± 0.38 and 7.69 ± 0.18 in WT [n = 3 mice] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 6 mice], respectively, p=0.39; Figure 4—figure supplement 1). These data suggest that direct engulfment of synapses by astrocytes through these pathways is not regulated by Shh signaling and is not responsible for the increased spine density seen in Gfap Smo CKO animals.

In the mature cerebellum, Shh signaling between Purkinje neurons and Bergmann glia regulates expression of the glial specific, inward-rectifying K+ channel, Kir4.1 (Farmer et al., 2016). In the cortex, the distribution of Kir4.1 exhibits a laminar pattern similar to that of Gli1 astrocytes, such that expression is enriched in layers IV and Vb, and reduced in layer Va (Figure 4). High resolution, confocal analysis showed that Kir4.1 is localized in the processes of Gli1 astrocytes (Figure 4). Kir4.1 expression is localized to astrocytic endfeet and is found surrounding neuronal somata in the spinal cord and brain (Kelley et al., 2018; Cui et al., 2018; Higashi et al., 2001). In WT mice, expression of Kir4.1 surrounded many NeuN-positive neuronal somata in layer V (Figure 4). In Gfap Smo CKO mice, however, there was a pronounced reduction in the expression of Kir4.1 throughout the cortex, and peri-somal Kir4.1 expression was severely diminished (Figure 4). In order to quantify expression levels of Kir4.1, we measured transcript abundance in the cortex of Gfap Smo CKO mice and WT controls by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). In Gfap Smo CKO mice, there was a 50% reduction in Kcnj10 transcripts compared to WT controls (1.99 × 106 ± 1.93 x 105 copies/µg and 9.92 × 105 ± 8.49 x 104 copies/µg in WT [n = 6 mice] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 4 mice], respectively, p=0.02). There was no difference in Kcnj10 levels in CK2 Smo CKO mice compared to WT (1.88 × 106 ± 3.77 × 105 copies/µg, p=0.95, n = 4 mice; Figure 4), suggesting that downregulation of Kir4.1 is due to astrocyte-specific, and not neuronal, disruption of Shh signaling. Conversely, Glast-CreER-mediated deletion of the Shh receptor Ptch1, a negative regulator of Shh signaling, dramatically upregulated Kir4.1 expression in the cortex (Glast Ptch CKO; Figure 4). Kir4.1 expression is associated with glutamate uptake both in vitro and in vivo (Kucheryavykh et al., 2007; Djukic et al., 2007; Tong et al., 2014). We therefore measured expression levels of the astrocyte-specific glutamate transporters Glast and Glt1. There was no difference in expression of these genes in Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to WT (Glt1: 1.08 × 107 ± 6.6 x 105 copies/µg and 9.58 × 106 ± 2.1 x 105 copies/µg in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.15, n = 3 mice per genotype; Glast: 7.4 × 106 ± 4.4 x 105 copies/µg and 6.7 × 106 ± 6.5 x 105 copies/µg in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.41, n = 3 mice per genotype; Figure 4—figure supplement 1). It should be noted that Kir4.1 was not restricted to Gli1 astrocytes in layers IV and Vb. Nevertheless, single transcript quantification of Kcnj10 transcripts in Gfap Smo CKO show a pronounced reduction, suggesting that Kir4.1 expression in cortical astrocytes is regulated, in part, by Shh signaling.

Figure 4. Shh signaling regulates Kir4.1 expression in the cortex.

(A–D) Immunofluorescence for Kir4.1 in the cortex of adult WT (A), Gfap Smo CKO (B), CK2 Smo CKO (C) and GLAST Ptch CKO mice (D). Scale bar, 125 μm. (E) Fluorescence micrographs showing the distribution of Gli1 astrocytes (red) and Kir4.1 (green) in the cortex of an adult Gli1CreER/+;Ai14 mouse counterstained with DAPI (blue). (F–G) Confocal images of Gli1 (F, red) Kir4.1 (green) and NeuN (white) from adult WT (F), Gfap Smo CKO (G), or CamK2a Smo CKO (H) mice. Scale bar, 25 μm. (I) Gene expression levels in the cortex of Kcnj10 from WT (n = 6 animals) and Gfap Smo CKO or CK2 Smo CKO mice (n = 4 each). Data points represent individual animals and bar graphs represent mean value ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. Significance stated on the graph is compared to WT.

Figure 4—source data 1. Measurement of gene expression.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.018

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Quantitative PCR analysis of known spine and synapse modulators shows no change in expression in Gfap Smo CKO mice.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Quantitative PCR shows no change in Megf10 or Mertk in Gfap Smo CKO animals compared to controls (n = 3 and 6 samples of cortical RNA from WT and Gfap Smo CKO animals, respectively). Statistical significance assessed by unpaired Student’s t-test of the quantification cycles for each sample. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. (B) Droplet digital PCR shows no difference in the number of transcripts of either Glt1 or Glast in Gfap Smo CKO animals (n = 3 cortical RNA samples per genotype). Statistical significance assessed by unpaired Student’s t-test of the copy number for each target in each genotype. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Neurons exhibit hyperexcitability in Gfap Smo CKO mice

To examine whether neurons in Gfap Smo CKO mice exhibit disruptions in physiological activity, we performed whole-cell patch clamp recordings of layer V pyramidal neurons from coronal brain slices at P21, and examined action potential firing and membrane properties. Using current clamp, we recorded action potential spikes per injected current at multiple step currents from −300 pA to +650 pA. Our results revealed a significant increase in spike numbers with high current injections (>500 pA) and total overall spikes in Gfap Smo CKO animals compared to WT control (326 ± 54 and 574 ± 71 spikes in WT [n = 11 cells from four animals] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 7 cells from three animals], respectively, p=0.01; Figure 5). We also measured other membrane properties, including input resistance, resting membrane potential and tau, and found no significant difference between Gfap Smo CKO and WT neurons (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). However, we observed a significant decrease in action potential threshold (−30.6 ± 2.0 and −37.9 ± 2.0 mV in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.0441), accompanied by an increase in action potential amplitude (59.6 ± 2.6 and 73.3 ± 3.0 pA in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.0083), and a trending decrease in action potential ½ width (1.0 ± 0.92 and 0.76 ± 0.02 ms in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.05) in Gfap Smo CKO neurons, consistent with an increase in neuron excitability (Figure 5). Together, these results suggest Gfap Smo CKO neurons exhibit an increase in neuronal excitability consistent with excess extracellular K+.

Figure 5. Neurons in Gfap Smo CKO mice exhibit a significant increase in excitability and synaptic transmission.

(A) Example traces of action potentials from layer V pyramidal neurons in WT and Gfap Smo CKO mice at P21. Samples of action potential spikes (dashed lines, lower panel) describe AP threshold, AP peak amplitude, and AP 1⁄2 width of pyramidal neurons. (B) Line graph displays relationship between action potential spike numbers (y-axis) and current injection; Gfap Smo CKO neurons exhibit an increase in AP spikes (>500 pA) compared to WT neurons. Statistical significance was assessed by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons and stated as Gfap Smo CKO compared to WT at a given current (n = 11 and 7 cells from WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively). (C–F) Bar graphs describe an increase in total AP spike numbers (C), reduction in AP threshold (mV) (D), reduction in AP 1/2 width (E), and increase in AP peak amplitude (pA) (F) in Gfap Smo CKO neurons. (G) Example traces of sEPSCs from layer V pyramidal neurons recorded in the presence of picrotoxin from WT and Gfap Smo CKO mice at P21. (H–I) Summary graphs of sEPSC frequency and amplitude (n = 14 and 11 cells from WT and Gfap Smo CKO animals, respectively). (J) Example traces of mEPSCs from layer V pyramidal neurons recorded in the presence of picrotoxin and TTX. (K–L) Summary graphs of mEPSC frequency and amplitude (n = 16 cells per genotype). Gfap Smo CKO neurons exhibit increases in both frequency and amplitude in sEPSCs and mEPSCs recordings. Statistical significance was assessed by unpaired Student’s t-test. For each graph, data points represent individual cells. All data are from at least three animals per genotype.

Figure 5—source data 1. Physiological properties of neurons and response to current injections.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.021
Figure 5—source data 2. Measurements of spontaneous and miniature EPSCs.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.022

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Membrane properties of Gfap Smo CKO layer V pyramidal neurons.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

There is a significant decrease in input resistance (MΩ) in Gfap Smo CKO neurons compared to WT neurons. No significant differences were observed in resting membrane potential (mV), rheobase (pA), and tau (ms) in Gfap Smo CKO neurons. Statistical significance was assessed by Mann-Whitney U test (input resistance and tau) and unpaired Student’s t-test (resting membrane potential).

To examine excitatory synaptic transmission, we recorded spontaneous and miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs and mEPSCs) in layer V pyramidal neurons. We found an increase in both the frequency (0.74 ± 0.08 and 1.18 ± 0.19 Hz in WT [n = 16 cells] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 16 cells], respectively, p=0.042) and amplitude (8.54 ± 0.38 and 11.33 ± 0.91 pA in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.008) of sEPSCs in slices from Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to WT control slices (four animals per genotype; Figure 5). Furthermore, we observed an increase in the frequency (0.40 ± 0.05 and 1.10 ± 0.23 Hz in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.003) and amplitude (7.54 ± 0.57 and 10.34 ± 0.74 pA in WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.005) in mEPSCs in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX), indicating an increase in postsynaptic response of neurons in Gfap Smo CKO mice (n = 14 and 11 cells from WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, four animals per genotype; Figure 5). These data suggest that loss of Shh activity in astrocytes produces disturbances in both pre and postsynaptic activity. Moreover, these data suggest that astrocytes modulate both neuronal excitability and excitatory synaptic transmission in a Shh-dependent manner.

Selective disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes produces mild reactive gliosis

We previously demonstrated that cortical astrocytes in Gfap Smo CKO mice upregulate GFAP expression and exhibit cellular hypertrophy, two classic hallmarks of reactive astrogliosis (Garcia et al., 2010). Astrocytes exhibiting these features were broadly distributed across cortical layers (Figure 6), in contrast to the distribution of Gli1 astrocytes which are found predominantly in layers IV and V. In addition to upregulation of GFAP, astrocytes in Gfap Smo CKO mice show dramatic changes in morphological structure. Sholl analysis revealed no difference in the number of primary branches in Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to WT controls (7.2 and 7.5 branches, WT [n = 9 cells] and Gfap Smo CKO [n = 9 cells], respectively, three animals per genotype). However, astrocytes from Gfap Smo CKO animals did show an increase in the number of higher order branches, the length of the longest tree (136.6 ± 17 and 212.1 ± 28 µm for WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.035), and the total length of all processes (397 ± 66 and 674 ± 91 µm for WT and Gfap Smo CKO, respectively, p=0.025) compared to WT controls (Figure 6). Consistent with this, there was a significant increase in the number of branches intersecting concentric shells at various distances from the soma (Figure 6). Notably, in CK2 Smo CKO mice, GFAP staining in the cortex was indistinguishable from WT controls (Figure 6—figure supplement 1), suggesting that astrocytes exhibit dramatic changes in morphological structure following astrocytic, but not neuronal, disruption of Shh signaling. Such changes in morphology are consistent with mild reactive gliosis, a complex cellular response of astrocytes to disturbances in physiological homeostasis (Sofroniew, 2015). Notably, the distribution of reactive astrocytes in Gfap Smo CKO mice is broader than that defined by Gli1 expression, arguing against the idea that Shh signaling regulates the intrinsic state of astrocytes. Rather, reactive gliosis may instead reflect a cellular response to the mild, but persistent, aberrations in neuronal activity observed in Gfap Smo CKO mice.

Figure 6. Disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes results in widespread reactive changes in morphology.

(A–B) Brightfield immunohistochemistry reveals a reactive upregulation of GFAP across cortical layers in Gfap Smo CKO astrocytes. Scale bar, 125 μm. (C and E) Representative high-magnification images of both WT (C) and Gfap Smo CKO (E) astrocytes are shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. (D and F) Representative traces of GFAP expression from WT (D) and Gfap Smo CKO (F) cortical astrocytes. (G and H) Sholl analysis shows significant increases in complexity of Gfap Smo CKO astrocytes compared to WT controls. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s for multiple comparisons. (I–K) Quantification of various morphological features of traced astrocytes. Statistical analysis performed by one-way ANOVA (G and H) and unpaired Student’s t-test (I–K). Data points represent individual cells. Graphs represent mean value ± SEM. n = 3 animals per genotype.

Figure 6—source data 1. Sholl analysis of cortical astrocytes.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.025

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Reactive gliosis does not occur when neuronal Shh signaling is disrupted.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

Brightfield immunohistochemistry for GFAP in the cortex of an adult CamKIIa;Smo fl/fl animal (B) and littermate control (A) shows comparable levels of GFAP expression. Scale bar, 125 μm.

Discussion

The dynamic processes underlying organization of synapses during postnatal development are essential for establishing functional neural circuits. In this study, we demonstrate that astrocytes modulate refinement and reorganization of synaptic connectivity in the postnatal cortex in a Shh-dependent manner. Our data show that Gli1 astrocytes are enriched in deep cortical layers with a relative paucity in upper cortical layers. Selective disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes leads to an overabundance of spines on the apical dendrites of layer V, but not layer II/III, cortical neurons. The overabundance of spines emerges during postnatal development, continues into adulthood and is accompanied by a reduction in dynamic turnover. Gfap Smo CKO mice exhibit a pronounced reduction in Kir4.1 as well as an increase in neuronal excitability. Finally, we show that cortical astrocytes exhibit dramatic changes in morphology and GFAP expression, a phenotype consistent with mild reactive gliosis. Our data identify an essential role for astrocyte modulation of neuronal activity during postnatal development, facilitating activity-dependent reorganization of synaptic connectivity.

To accomplish selective disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes, we used a Cre driver in which expression is regulated by the full-length mouse Gfap gene (Garcia et al., 2004). Single cell analysis in Gfap-Cre;Ai14 mice showed that nearly all cortical astrocytes undergo Cre-mediated recombination, while the fraction of recombined cortical neurons is less than 2%. Importantly, we observed recombined neurons predominantly in superficial layers, consistent with early Cre activity during late embryogenesis when layer II/III neurons are being generated. Notably, despite a small population of Smo null neurons in layer II/III, changes in spine density are not observed in these cells. In addition, a more complete deletion of Smo in excitatory neurons using the CamKIIαCre driver fails to alter spine density in layer V neurons, arguing against non-specific effects arising from the small population of recombined neurons in Gfap Smo CKO mice. Importantly, Gli1 expression is nearly completely lost in Gfap Smo CKO mice, with no loss in the number of total astrocytes (Garcia et al., 2010), demonstrating effective disruption of Shh activity in these mice. Because a small number of recombined oligodendrocytes were observed in GfapCre;Ai14 mice, the possibility that these cells may contribute to some of the observed phenotypes cannot be ruled out. However Gli1 expression is restricted predominantly to astrocytes in the adult forebrain (Garcia et al., 2010). Thus, any contribution from other cell types must be mediated by non-canonical, Gli-independent mechanisms.

In the postnatal cortex, Shh signaling from layer V neurons mediates synaptic connectivity with their layer II/III presynaptic partners (Harwell et al., 2012). Here, we show that, in addition to neuronal Shh signaling, Shh activity in astrocytes is required for the establishment and maintenance of cortical circuits. This is supported by two key observations in our study. First, we find that in Gfap Smo CKO mice, apical dendrites of cortical neurons exhibit an increase in spine density that emerges during postnatal development and persists into adulthood. Importantly, genetic deletion of Smo in mature neurons instead of astrocytes failed to show any differences in spine density, pointing to a specific role for Shh signaling in astrocyte regulation of synaptic connectivity. Interestingly, deletion of Shh ligand using an EmxCre driver produces a reduction in spine density of basal dendrites (Harwell et al., 2012), whereas we found no difference in basal dendrite spine density, suggesting that Shh acts in distinct, cell type-specific ways to regulate synaptic connectivity of local cortical circuits. Indeed, whereas astrocytes express Gli1, neurons do not (Garcia et al., 2010), indicating differential transduction of Shh through canonical and non-canonical, Gli-independent pathways, respectively, in different cell types. Second, our data show fewer filopodia in juvenile Gfap Smo CKO mice compared to WT controls along with a concomitant increase in spine stability. In the adult, spines continue to show deficits in dynamic turnover, demonstrating long-term impairments in structural plasticity. This suggests that Shh signaling is required not only for identifying appropriate synaptic partners during development, but also plays an important role in mediating synaptic plasticity.

In the postnatal and adult brain, we and others identified neurons as the source of Shh (Harwell et al., 2012; Garcia et al., 2010; Farmer et al., 2016; Álvarez-Buylla and Ihrie, 2014). However non-neuronal sources, including astrocytes have been identified in the injured brain (Amankulor et al., 2009; Sirko et al., 2013). Beyond the CNS, epithelial cells have been reported as a source of Shh in the developing dentate gyrus (Choe et al., 2015). It will be interesting to examine whether other non-neuronal sources are available to trigger astrocyte transduction of Shh.

We previously demonstrated that Gli1 expression is restricted to a subpopulation of cortical astrocytes (Garcia et al., 2010). Here, we extend these findings and demonstrate that the distribution of Gli1 astrocytes in the cortex is not uniform across cortical layers, but rather, occurs in a laminar-specific fashion. Cortical layers have been historically defined by neuronal populations and their specific functional properties and connectivity. However, emerging evidence suggests that astrocytes also exhibit cortical lamination patterns based on distinct gene expression profiles (Bayraktar, 2018; Miller et al., 2019). Our data show that Gli1 astrocytes are enriched in layers IV and V with a relatively sparse distribution in layer II/III. Interestingly, a recent study reported a population of astrocytes with a similar distribution that show enrichment of the Shh pathway (Miller et al., 2019). These cells were also shown to regulate spine density of Layer V cortical neurons. It will be interesting to examine whether these cells correspond to Gli1 astrocytes reported in this study. Whereas astrocytes transducing Shh are enriched in deep cortical layers, the BMP antagonist, chordin-like 1 (Chrdl1) is preferentially enriched in upper layer cortical astrocytes (Blanco-Suarez et al., 2018), suggesting that Gli1 and Chrdl1 may identify two distinct, but regionally complementary, astrocyte populations. Alternatively, Shh signaling may actively repress Chrdl1 expression in deep layer astrocytes. Notably, our observation that Gli1 astrocytes only comprise a fraction of astrocytes in layers IV and V suggests that, in addition to the laminar-specific distribution of these cells, there may be additional heterogeneity of astrocytes even within a given cortical layer. Whether and how the laminar distribution of astrocytes with distinct gene expression profiles confers functional specialization is not well understood and requires further study.

Interestingly, we observed that the disturbances in synaptic organization of cortical neurons in Gfap Smo CKO mice occurs selectively in apical dendrites of layer V, but not layer II/III, neurons. Since apical dendrites of layer V neurons traverse through layer II/III, this suggests that Shh-dependent regulation of synaptic refinement is not mediated by direct interaction between Gli1 astrocytes and synapses. One possibility is that Gli1 astrocytes interact with neuronal soma in layer V and effectively modulate their excitability. Our observation that Kir4.1 expression in cortical astrocytes is regulated by Shh signaling suggests that Gfap Smo CKO mice may experience deficits in local buffering of extracellular K+ leading to perturbations in neuronal activity. Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that Kir4.1 surrounds neuronal soma in the lateral habenula and regulates their firing properties (Cui et al., 2018). Astrocytes play essential roles in buffering extracellular K+ through Kir4.1, and several studies demonstrate that loss of function of Kir4.1 impairs K+ uptake and increases neuronal excitability (Djukic et al., 2007; Tong et al., 2014; Sibille et al., 2014). Alternatively, increased neuronal excitability may be due to disruptions in glutamate clearance. Although we did not observe changes in expression of either Glt1 or Glast, deficits in Shh-dependent trafficking, localization or transporter function would lead to impairments in astrocyte-mediated glutamate clearance. Further work is needed to definitively identify the precise mechanism underlying the abnormal firing properties of neurons in Gfap Smo CKO mice.

The establishment of appropriate synapse number and connectivity are tightly regulated processes that are profoundly shaped by experience or activity (Zuo et al., 2005b; Yang et al., 2009). Our observation that Gfap Smo CKO mice show increases in spontaneous neuronal activity and excitability, accompanied by a pronounced increase in spine density suggests that astrocytes contribute to activity-dependent processes that shape the organization of developing neural circuits in a Shh-dependent manner. The deficits in synaptic organization observed in Gfap Smo CKO mice persist for the life of the animal. These deficits are not limited to synapse number but also include lower rates of spine turnover, suggesting long-lasting deficits in structural plasticity. Together with the observation that Shh guides local synaptic connectivity of cortical neurons (Harwell et al., 2012), these studies reveal that Shh signaling exerts considerable influence on the establishment and maintenance of cortical circuits.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type
(species) or
resource
Designation Source
or reference
Identifiers Additional
information
Genetic reagent (M. musculus) Gli1CreER/+ The Jackson Laboratory; Ahn and Joyner, 2005 stock no. 7913 from Alexandra Joyner, MSKCC
Genetic reagent (M. musculus) Ai14 (B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J) The Jackson Laboratory; Madisen et al., 2010 stock no.7914
Genetic reagent (M. musculus) Gfap-Cre, line 73.12 The Jackson Laboratory; Garcia et al., 2004 stock no. 12886 from Michael Sofroniew, UCLA
Genetic reagent (M. musculus) Smofl/fl The Jackson Laboratory; Long et al., 2001 stock no.4526
Genetic reagent (M. musculus) CamKinaseIIα-Cre (CamKIIα-Cre) The Jackson Laboratory; Tsien et al., 1996 stock no. 5359
Genetic reagent (M. musculus) Thy1-GFPm The Jackson Laboratory; Feng et al., 2000 stock no. 7788
Chemical compound, drug tamoxifen Sigma catalog no. T5648
Antibody Polyclonal rabbit anti-GFP Millipore catalog no. AB3080 1:5000 (brightfield); 1:1000 (fluorescence)
Antibody Polyclonal rabbit anti-Kir4.1 Millipore catalog no. AB5818 1:1000 (fluorescence)
Antibody Polyclonal rabbit anti-Gfap Agilent Dako catalog no. Z033429-2; 1:20,000 (brightfield)
Antibody Monoclonal mouse anti-NeuN Millipore catalog no. MAB377 1:1000 (fluorescence)
Antibody Polyclonal rabbit anti-RFP MBL International catalog no. PM005 1:500 (fluorescence)
Antibody Monoclonal rat anti-Ctip2 Abcam catalog no. ab18465 1:2000 (fluroescence0
Antibody Polyclonal sheep anti-CAII Bio-Rad catalog no. AHP206 1:2000 (fluorescence)
Antibody Polyclonal rabbit anti-S100B Agilent Dako catalog no. Z0311 1:1000 (fluorescence)
Antibody Polyclonal rabbit anti-Olig2 Millipore catalog no. AB9610 1:1000 (fluorescence)
Software, algorithm computer assisted tracing of dendrites and spines; Sholl analysis of astrocytes Neurolucida, MBF Biociences Williston, VT
Software, algorithm MATLAB-based custom-written code for longitudinal analysis of spine turnover This paper Figure 3—source code 1

Animals

All experiments were approved by Drexel University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted according to approved protocols. We used the following strains of transgenic mice on the C57BL/6 background: Gli1CreER/+ (Ahn and Joyner, 2005), Ai14 (Madisen et al., 2010), Smofl/fl (Long et al., 2001), Gfap-Cre (Garcia et al., 2004), CaMKIIa-Cre (Tsien et al., 1996) and Thy1-GFPm (Feng et al., 2000). Mice of either sex were included in these studies.

Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen was administered as previously described (Garcia et al., 2010; Allahyari et al., 2019). Briefly, tamoxifen (Sigma, T5648) was dissolved in corn oil to a final concentration of 20 mg/ml. Adult Gli1CreER/+;Ai14 mice received 250 mg/kg tamoxifen by oral gavage for three consecutive days, and tissues were analyzed two – three weeks later.

Immunohistochemistry

Mice were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine. Animals were then transcardially injected with 100 units heparin and perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Brains were fixed overnight at 4°C and then transferred to 30% sucrose for at least 48 hr or until sectioned. Brains were cryosectioned (Leica CM3050S, Wetzlar, Germany) and collected in 40 µm sections. Sections were stored in 0.1M Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.05% sodium azide at 4°C. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-GFP (AB3080; Millipore, Burlington, MA), rabbit anti-Kir4.1 (AB5818; Millipore), rabbit anti-GFAP (Z033429-2; Agilent DAKO, Santa Clara, CA), mouse anti-NeuN (MAB377; Millipore), rabbit anti-RFP (PM005; MBL International, Woburn, MA), rat anti-Ctip2 (ab18465; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), sheep anti-CAII (AHP206; Bio-Rad), rabbit anti-S100β (Z0311, Agilent), and rabbit anti-Olig2 (AB9610; Millipore). Sections were washed three times in 0.1M TBS at room temperature (10 min/wash). Sections were then blocked in 10% Normal Serum with 0.5% Triton-X (Sigma-Aldrich) for one hour at room temperature and incubated with primary antibody in 0.5% Triton-X at 4°C overnight. For fluorescent immunohistochemistry, sections were rinsed the following day in 0.1M TBS and incubated in Alexafluor-conjugated secondary antibodies with 10% Normal Serum and 0.1M TBS and incubated at room temperature for two hours. The sections were then rinsed in 0.1 TBS and incubated in DAPI (1:50,000; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) for 15 min. Sections were rinsed again in 0.1M TBS and mounted onto microscope slides (Fisherbrand, Waltham, MA) and coverslipped using ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and Fisherfinest Premium Cover Glass. For brightfield immunohistochemistry, sections were rinsed as previously described but were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibodies against the primary antibody species (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for one hour. Sections were then placed in Avitin-Biotin Complex solution (Vector) for one hour and visualized using 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB Peroxidase Substrate Kit, Vector). Sections were then mounted onto slides and coverslipped with DPX Mountant (Fisher).

Quantification of dendritic spine density

Analysis of spine density was performed in a blinded study design. WT controls were derived from Cre-negative littermates. Neurons were traced using Neurolucida (MicroBrightField Biosciences, Williston, VT) and individual spines were marked. Apical dendrites of layer V neurons were counted from ~100 µm below the primary bifurcation through the apical tuft. Apical dendrites of layer II/III cells were analyzed just below the primary bifurcation through the apical tuft. Basal dendrites were analyzed beginning ~50 µm from the soma through the end of the processes. CA1 hippocampal neurons were analyzed from just below the primary bifurcation through the apical tuft. All analysis was performed on an upright Zeiss microscope using a 63X oil objective.

Cranial window

Cranial window surgeries were adapted from a published protocol (Holtmaat et al., 2009). Immediately prior to each surgery, mice received a subcutaneous injection of carprofen (Rimadyl, 5 mg/kg), and a follow-up injection was given 24 hr after surgery. Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane (5%) in an induction chamber, and then transferred to a stereotaxic apparatus where they inhaled 1.5% isoflurane continuously for the duration of the surgery. The scalp was then removed and a metal bar (~1 cm long) with threadings for screws was affixed to the skull, using superglue and dental acrylic to form a head post that sealed off the skin while leaving the right parietal bone exposed. After allowing 24 hr for the glue and acrylic to set, the mouse was returned to the stereotaxic apparatus and head-fixed using the headpost. A circular craniotomy ~3 mm in diameter and centered 2.5 mm lateral and posterior to bregma was performed. The exposed dura was treated with saline-soaked gel foam until any minor bleeding ceased. Finally, a 3 mm glass coverslip was gently pressed onto the dura and sealed in place using superglue and dental acrylic. Adult mice were allowed at least 1 week for recovery. To mitigate the tendency of rapid bone growth to destabilize the windows at younger ages, juvenile mice were allowed 24 hr to recover.

Two-photon imaging

A commercial two-photon microscope (Bruker, Billerica, MA) with a tunable Ti:Sapphire laser (Coherent, Santa Clara, CA) was used for all experiments. The laser was set to 920 nm and power was tuned on the sample as necessary to obtain consistently high-quality images without damaging the tissue. Mice were head-fixed and anesthetized with continuous isoflurane (1–1.5%) during imaging. Under a 20X water immersion objective, GFP-expressing neurons were identified visually and then imaged down to the cell body to determine layer. From the apical dendrite tuft, individual dendrite segments that projected primarily along the xy-plane were selected for analysis, and z-stacks (0.5 µm step size) were collected. To track individual dendrites, repeated imaging was generally performed on the following schedule (in days, relative to first imaging session): 0, 1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42. Some data from studies using other schedules were also included. For juvenile mice, this schedule was: 0, 1, 2.

Analysis of spine dynamics

Every effort was made to use Cre-negative, littermate controls for these experiments. However, it was not always possible to match littermate controls in the final data sets presented here, either due to the absence of the GFP allele in the Cre-negative controls, or due to the loss of head caps securing the cranial windows, over time. However, it should be noted that all data presented here represent Cre-negative controls from the appropriate strain, if not necessarily from the same litter.

To analyze spine turnover, we performed side-by-side manual comparison of dendritic protrusions using ImageJ. Z-stacks from two time points were analyzed, and individual protrusions were identified as present or absent in each stack. For each mouse, a minimum of 150 protrusions were analyzed, although the average number of protrusions analyzed per mouse was 250–300. These comparisons were conducted by trained observers blinded to mouse genotype. Long, thin protrusions lacking a bulbous head were identified as filopodia, and any other prominent dendritic protrusion that extended >0.4 µm from the shaft was counted as a spine. The filopodial fraction was calculated as the proportion of all analyzed features present at the first imaging timepoint that were identified as filopodia. The position and dynamic status (stable/eliminated/formed) of each spine was recorded using ImageJ’s CellCounter plugin. Each neuron’s turnover ratio was calculated as:

TO=(Nelim+Nform)/(Nelim+Nform+2Nstable)

For longitudinal analysis of spine lifetime, the individual features identified in our manual ImageJ analysis were then imported into custom written MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA) code and manually tracked across all imaged time-points using custom-written software. This code facilitated the efficient manual tracking of each feature by iteratively estimating the z-plane, within each stack, in which that feature would be expected to appear, assuming a linear relationship. Using a graphical user interface, the user was presented with a series of frames centered on that plane and allowed to make a determination of the feature’s presence or absence simply by left-clicking on the feature, or in the case of absence right-clicking on the location it otherwise would have been, using the best frame presented (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Due to the iterative nature of this procedure, each dataset was run through at least twice to ensure that not only were the determinations of presence/absence accurate, but that the marked locations of every feature were optimal.

Spines that were observed consistently across all time points were classified as stable. Spines that disappeared at some time point and were observed again in a subsequent time point were classified as recurrent. Spines that disappeared and never reappeared were classified as transient. To compare long-term dynamics between WT and Gfap Smo CKO mice, we examined the survival curves, S(t), for each mouse, where:

S(t)=#ofspinesconsistentlypresenttotimepoint/#ofspinesinitiallyobserved

Survival curves for each mouse were pooled by genotype and fit to a single-phase exponential decay model:

S(t)=Sp+Siexp(t/τ)

where Sp and Si represent the relative fractions of permanent and impermanent spines respectively and τ is the characteristic lifespan of impermanent spines. Fitting and statistical comparison of survival data was performed with PRISM 6 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) software.

To analyze morphology, we examined data from the first imaged day, and classified individual protrusions as filopodia, intermediate, or mushroom spines. For each protrusion, a mean projection image was generated, averaging the frame on which the protrusion was manually marked in the original analysis and the two neighboring frames (1 above and one below, effectively averaging over 1.5 um of depth in the z axis). Each image was cropped, centering around the protrusion's XY coordinates and a marker was drawn on the image to indicate which protrusion was under consideration. These images were then presented to the scorer sequentially for scoring. Protrusions exhibiting a bright, bulbous head were scored as mushroom. Thin protrusions exhibiting a relatively dim, small head, or no head, were scored as intermediate. Dim, elongated protrusions that lacked any head were scored as filopodia.

Transcript quantification

Mice were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine/xylazine/acepromezine before rapid decapitation. Cortices were dissected into TRIzol reagent (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA) and RNA was extracted according to the standard protocol. RNA was then purified with an RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subsequently reverse transcribed to cDNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo-Fisher). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was performed with the QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System using Evagreen Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Alternatively, for Megf10 and Mertk, qPCR was performed with the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo-Fisher). PrimePCR ddPCR Expression EvaGreen Assay (Bio-Rad) was used for Gapdh primers; all other primers were designed using NCBI Primer-BLAST as follows: Kcnj10 F, GCTGCCCCGCGATTTATCAG; Kcnj10 R, AGCGACCGACGTCATCTTGG; Glast F, TCCTCTACTTCCTGGTAACCC; Glast R, TCCACACCATTGTTCTCTTCC; Glt1 F, CATCAACAGAGGGTGCCAAC; Glt1 R, CACACTGCTCCCAGGATGAC; Megf10 F, CTCACTGCTCTGTCACTGGGTG; Megf10 R, GGTAGCTGATTCTGTGCCGTGT; Mertk F, AAACTGCATGTTGCGGGATGAC; Mertk R, TCCCACATGGTCACGCCAAA. ddPCR absolute quantification of targets was calculated using Quantasoft Version 1.7 software (Bio-Rad). Samples were run in triplicate, and Gapdh was quantified for each sample as a loading control with no difference detected between sample groups.

Slice electrophysiology

Mice aged P21 were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of euthasol (0.2 ml/kg) and brains were rapidly removed. 300 µm coronal slices were cut using a vibratome tissue slicer (Leica) and transferred to a holding chamber, submerged in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF, in mM: 124 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgSO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 dextrose, pH 7.4) at 36°C for 1 hr and then maintained at room temperature. Individual slices containing the barrel cortex were placed into a recording chamber immersed in oxygenated ACSF mounted on an Olympus upright microscope (BX51). Neurons were visualized with infrared differential interference video microscopy.

Whole-cell current clamp was used to record action potentials from layer V pyramidal cells using patch electrodes with an open tip resistance of 7–10 MΩ. Patch electrodes were filled with potassium gluconate internal solution (in mM): 120 potassium gluconate, 20 KCl, 4 ATP-Na, 0.3 Na2GTP, 5 Na-phosphocreatine, 0.1 EGTA, 10 HEPES, pH 7.3, 305 mOsmol/l) and action potential responses were measured in response to various step currents from −300 pA to +650 pA with 50 pA increments. Action potentials were described as spike numbers per depolarized current injections. The resting membrane potential, input resistance, action potential (AP) threshold, AP half-width, and peak AP amplitude were also measured.

Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were obtained from layer V pyramidal cells using patch electrodes with Cs+-containing solution (in mM): 120 Cs-gluconate, five lidocaine, 6 CaCl2, 1 Na2ATP, 0.3 Na2GTP, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.3 adjusted by CsOH). To record spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs), cells were held at a membrane potential of −70 mV in the presence of GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxin (PTX; 100 µM, Sigma-Aldrich) and recorded for 5 min. Miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) were then recorded for an additional 5 min in the presence of both picrotoxin and tetrodotoxin (TTX, 0.5 μM, Hello Bio, Princeton, NJ). All recordings were conducted with Axon MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA). The sEPSCs and mEPSCs frequency and amplitudes were measured by averaging five sweeps from the onset of recording with Clampfit 9.2 software (Molecular Devices). The s/mEPSCs were detected and characterized using a sample template for the 5 min data period. Based upon the selected sample template, the frequency (number of event detections) and amplitude of events were measured using a threshold set in Clampfit.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses used for various datasets are indicated both in the figure legends and in the text. Prism six software (GraphPad) was used for all analyses and to generate graphs.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Pooja Sakthivel and Nikhil Karmacharya for technical assistance and Dr. Monica Truelove-Hill for assistance with statistical analyses. We also thank Dr. Michael Akins for helpful discussions.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

A Denise R Garcia, Email: adg82@drexel.edu.

Dwight E Bergles, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States.

Didier Y Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 1R01NS096100 to A Denise R Garcia.

  • National Institute of Mental Health 5R21MH110724 to A Denise R Garcia.

  • Pennsylvania Department of Health CURE to Wen-Jun Gao, A Denise R Garcia.

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke F99NS105185 to Austin A Coley.

  • National Institute of Mental Health R01MH085666 to Wen-Jun Gao.

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke K01NS089720 to Corey C Harwell.

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke R01NS102228 to Corey C Harwell.

  • Genise Goldenson Junior Faculty Award to Corey C Harwell.

  • Alice and Joseph Brooks Fund Postdoctoral Fellowship to Yajun Xie.

  • Louis Perry Jones Postdoctoral Fellowship to Yajun Xie.

  • National Institute of Mental Health 7K01MH097957 to A Denise R Garcia.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Formal analysis, Investigation.

Formal analysis, Investigation.

Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—review and editing.

Writing—review and editing, Analysis and interpretation of data.

Writing—review and editing, Analysis and interpretation of data.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#20476) of Drexel University. All surgery was performed under isoflurane or ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Additional files

Transparent reporting form
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.026

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-6.

References

  1. Adamsky A, Kol A, Kreisel T, Doron A, Ozeri-Engelhard N, Melcer T, Refaeli R, Horn H, Regev L, Groysman M, London M, Goshen I. Astrocytic activation generates de novo neuronal potentiation and memory enhancement. Cell. 2018;174:59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahn S, Joyner AL. In vivo analysis of quiescent adult neural stem cells responding to sonic hedgehog. Nature. 2005;437:894–897. doi: 10.1038/nature03994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allahyari RV, Clark KL, Shepard KA, Garcia ADR. Sonic hedgehog signaling is negatively regulated in reactive astrocytes after forebrain stab injury. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37555-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen NJ, Bennett ML, Foo LC, Wang GX, Chakraborty C, Smith SJ, Barres BA. Astrocyte glypicans 4 and 6 promote formation of excitatory synapses via GluA1 AMPA receptors. Nature. 2012;486:410–414. doi: 10.1038/nature11059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen NJ, Eroglu C. Cell biology of Astrocyte-Synapse interactions. Neuron. 2017;96:697–708. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alvarez JI, Dodelet-Devillers A, Kebir H, Ifergan I, Fabre PJ, Terouz S, Sabbagh M, Wosik K, Bourbonnière L, Bernard M, van Horssen J, de Vries HE, Charron F, Prat A. The hedgehog pathway promotes blood-brain barrier integrity and CNS immune quiescence. Science. 2011;334:1727–1731. doi: 10.1126/science.1206936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Álvarez-Buylla A, Ihrie RA. Sonic hedgehog signaling in the postnatal brain. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2014;33:105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Amankulor NM, Hambardzumyan D, Pyonteck SM, Becher OJ, Joyce JA, Holland EC. Sonic hedgehog pathway activation is induced by acute brain injury and regulated by injury-related inflammation. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:10299–10308. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2500-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Attardo A, Fitzgerald JE, Schnitzer MJ. Impermanence of dendritic spines in live adult CA1 hippocampus. Nature. 2015;523:592–596. doi: 10.1038/nature14467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bayraktar OA. Single-cell in situ transcriptomic map of astrocyte cortical layer diversity. bioRxiv. 2018 doi: 10.1101/432104. [DOI]
  11. Berry KP, Nedivi E. Spine dynamics: are they all the same? Neuron. 2017;96:43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Blanco-Suarez E, Liu TF, Kopelevich A, Allen NJ. Astrocyte-Secreted Chordin-like 1 drives synapse maturation and limits plasticity by increasing synaptic GluA2 AMPA receptors. Neuron. 2018;100:1116–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Choe Y, Huynh T, Pleasure SJ. Epithelial cells supply sonic hedgehog to the perinatal dentate gyrus via transport by platelets. eLife. 2015;4:e07834. doi: 10.7554/eLife.07834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Christopherson KS, Ullian EM, Stokes CC, Mullowney CE, Hell JW, Agah A, Lawler J, Mosher DF, Bornstein P, Barres BA. Thrombospondins are astrocyte-secreted proteins that promote CNS synaptogenesis. Cell. 2005;120:421–433. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chung WS, Clarke LE, Wang GX, Stafford BK, Sher A, Chakraborty C, Joung J, Foo LC, Thompson A, Chen C, Smith SJ, Barres BA. Astrocytes mediate synapse elimination through MEGF10 and MERTK pathways. Nature. 2013;504:394–400. doi: 10.1038/nature12776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chung WS, Allen NJ, Eroglu C. Astrocytes control synapse formation, function, and elimination. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2015;7:a020370. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cui Y, Yang Y, Ni Z, Dong Y, Cai G, Foncelle A, Ma S, Sang K, Tang S, Li Y, Shen Y, Berry H, Wu S, Hu H. Astroglial Kir4.1 in the lateral habenula drives neuronal bursts in depression. Nature. 2018;554:323–327. doi: 10.1038/nature25752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Djukic B, Casper KB, Philpot BD, Chin LS, McCarthy KD. Conditional knock-out of Kir4.1 leads to glial membrane depolarization, inhibition of potassium and glutamate uptake, and enhanced short-term synaptic potentiation. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27:11354–11365. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0723-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Farmer WT, Abrahamsson T, Chierzi S, Lui C, Zaelzer C, Jones EV, Bally BP, Chen GG, Théroux JF, Peng J, Bourque CW, Charron F, Ernst C, Sjöström PJ, Murai KK. Neurons diversify astrocytes in the adult brain through sonic hedgehog signaling. Science. 2016;351:849–854. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 2000;28:41–51. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuccillo M, Joyner AL, Fishell G. Morphogen to mitogen: the multiple roles of hedgehog signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2006;7:772–783. doi: 10.1038/nrn1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcia AD, Doan NB, Imura T, Bush TG, Sofroniew MV. GFAP-expressing progenitors are the principal source of constitutive neurogenesis in adult mouse forebrain. Nature Neuroscience. 2004;7:1233–1241. doi: 10.1038/nn1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garcia AD, Petrova R, Eng L, Joyner AL. Sonic hedgehog regulates discrete populations of astrocytes in the adult mouse forebrain. Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30:13597–13608. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0830-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcia ADR, Han YG, Triplett JW, Farmer WT, Harwell CC, Ihrie RA. The elegance of sonic hedgehog: emerging novel functions for a classic morphogen. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2018;38:9338–9345. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1662-18.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grutzendler J, Kasthuri N, Gan WB. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature. 2002;420:812–816. doi: 10.1038/nature01276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Han YG, Spassky N, Romaguera-Ros M, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Aguilar A, Schneider-Maunoury S, Alvarez-Buylla A. Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia are required for the formation of adult neural stem cells. Nature Neuroscience. 2008;11:277–284. doi: 10.1038/nn2059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Harwell CC, Parker PR, Gee SM, Okada A, McConnell SK, Kreitzer AC, Kriegstein AR. Sonic hedgehog expression in corticofugal projection neurons directs cortical microcircuit formation. Neuron. 2012;73:1116–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Higashi K, Fujita A, Inanobe A, Tanemoto M, Doi K, Kubo T, Kurachi Y. An inwardly rectifying K(+) channel, Kir4.1, expressed in astrocytes surrounds synapses and blood vessels in brain. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 2001;281:C922–C931. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.3.C922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Holtmaat AJ, Trachtenberg JT, Wilbrecht L, Shepherd GM, Zhang X, Knott GW, Svoboda K. Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo. Neuron. 2005;45:279–291. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Holtmaat A, Bonhoeffer T, Chow DK, Chuckowree J, De Paola V, Hofer SB, Hübener M, Keck T, Knott G, Lee WC, Mostany R, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Nedivi E, Portera-Cailliau C, Svoboda K, Trachtenberg JT, Wilbrecht L. Long-term, high-resolution imaging in the mouse neocortex through a chronic cranial window. Nature Protocols. 2009;4:1128–1144. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Holtmaat A, Svoboda K. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10:647–658. doi: 10.1038/nrn2699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ihrie RA, Shah JK, Harwell CC, Levine JH, Guinto CD, Lezameta M, Kriegstein AR, Alvarez-Buylla A. Persistent sonic hedgehog signaling in adult brain determines neural stem cell positional identity. Neuron. 2011;71:250–262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kelley KW, Ben Haim L, Schirmer L, Tyzack GE, Tolman M, Miller JG, Tsai HH, Chang SM, Molofsky AV, Yang Y, Patani R, Lakatos A, Ullian EM, Rowitch DH. Kir4.1-Dependent Astrocyte-Fast motor neuron interactions are required for peak strength. Neuron. 2018;98:306–319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kucheryavykh YV, Kucheryavykh LY, Nichols CG, Maldonado HM, Baksi K, Reichenbach A, Skatchkov SN, Eaton MJ. Downregulation of Kir4.1 inward rectifying potassium channel subunits by RNAi impairs potassium transfer and glutamate uptake by cultured cortical astrocytes. Glia. 2007;55:274–281. doi: 10.1002/glia.20455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kucukdereli H, Allen NJ, Lee AT, Feng A, Ozlu MI, Conatser LM, Chakraborty C, Workman G, Weaver M, Sage EH, Barres BA, Eroglu C. Control of excitatory CNS synaptogenesis by astrocyte-secreted proteins Hevin and SPARC. PNAS. 2011;108:E440–E449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104977108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lendvai B, Stern EA, Chen B, Svoboda K. Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo. Nature. 2000;404:876–881. doi: 10.1038/35009107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Long F, Zhang XM, Karp S, Yang Y, McMahon AP. Genetic manipulation of hedgehog signaling in the endochondral skeleton reveals a direct role in the regulation of chondrocyte proliferation. Development. 2001;128:5099–5108. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.24.5099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, Lein ES, Zeng H. A robust and high-throughput cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nature Neuroscience. 2010;13:133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller SJ, Philips T, Kim N, Dastgheyb R, Chen Z, Hsieh YC, Daigle JG, Datta M, Chew J, Vidensky S, Pham JT, Hughes EG, Robinson MB, Sattler R, Tomer R, Suk JS, Bergles DE, Haughey N, Pletnikov M, Hanes J, Rothstein JD. Molecularly defined cortical astroglia subpopulation modulates neurons via secretion of norrin. Nature Neuroscience. 2019;22:741–752. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0366-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nimchinsky EA, Sabatini BL, Svoboda K. Structure and function of dendritic spines. Annual Review of Physiology. 2002;64:313–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.081501.160008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Olsen ML, Sontheimer H. Functional implications for Kir4.1 channels in glial biology: from K+ buffering to cell differentiation. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2008;107:589–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05615.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Penzes P, Cahill ME, Jones KA, VanLeeuwen JE, Woolfrey KM. Dendritic spine pathology in neuropsychiatric disorders. Nature Neuroscience. 2011;14:285–293. doi: 10.1038/nn.2741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Perez-Cruz C, Nolte MW, van Gaalen MM, Rustay NR, Termont A, Tanghe A, Kirchhoff F, Ebert U. Reduced spine density in specific regions of CA1 pyramidal neurons in two transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:3926–3934. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6142-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Risher WC, Patel S, Kim IH, Uezu A, Bhagat S, Wilton DK, Pilaz L-J, Singh Alvarado J, Calhan OY, Silver DL, Stevens B, Calakos N, Soderling SH, Eroglu C. Astrocytes refine cortical connectivity at dendritic spines. eLife. 2014;3:e04047. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ruiz i Altaba A, Palma V, Dahmane N. Hedgehog-Gli signalling and the growth of the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2002;3:24–33. doi: 10.1038/nrn704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sibille J, Pannasch U, Rouach N. Astroglial potassium clearance contributes to short-term plasticity of synaptically evoked currents at the tripartite synapse. The Journal of Physiology. 2014;592:87–102. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.261735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sirko S, Behrendt G, Johansson PA, Tripathi P, Costa M, Bek S, Heinrich C, Tiedt S, Colak D, Dichgans M, Fischer IR, Plesnila N, Staufenbiel M, Haass C, Snapyan M, Saghatelyan A, Tsai LH, Fischer A, Grobe K, Dimou L, Götz M. Reactive glia in the injured brain acquire stem cell properties in response to sonic hedgehog. [corrected] Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:426–439. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sofroniew MV. Astrocyte barriers to neurotoxic inflammation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2015;16:249–263. doi: 10.1038/nrn3898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tong X, Ao Y, Faas GC, Nwaobi SE, Xu J, Haustein MD, Anderson MA, Mody I, Olsen ML, Sofroniew MV, Khakh BS. Astrocyte Kir4.1 ion channel deficits contribute to neuronal dysfunction in Huntington's disease model mice. Nature Neuroscience. 2014;17:694–703. doi: 10.1038/nn.3691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Trachtenberg JT, Chen BE, Knott GW, Feng G, Sanes JR, Welker E, Svoboda K. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature. 2002;420:788–794. doi: 10.1038/nature01273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Traiffort E, Angot E, Ruat M. Sonic hedgehog signaling in the mammalian brain. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2010;113:576–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tsien JZ, Chen DF, Gerber D, Tom C, Mercer EH, Anderson DJ, Mayford M, Kandel ER, Tonegawa S. Subregion- and cell type-restricted gene knockout in mouse brain. Cell. 1996;87:1317–1326. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81826-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vooijs M, Jonkers J, Berns A. A highly efficient ligand-regulated cre recombinase mouse line shows that LoxP recombination is position dependent. EMBO Reports. 2001;2:292–297. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Yang G, Pan F, Gan WB. Stably maintained dendritic spines are associated with lifelong memories. Nature. 2009;462:920–924. doi: 10.1038/nature08577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ziv NE, Smith SJ. Evidence for a role of dendritic filopodia in synaptogenesis and spine formation. Neuron. 1996;17:91–102. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80283-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zuo Y, Lin A, Chang P, Gan WB. Development of long-term dendritic spine stability in diverse regions of cerebral cortex. Neuron. 2005a;46:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zuo Y, Yang G, Kwon E, Gan WB. Long-term sensory deprivation prevents dendritic spine loss in primary somatosensory cortex. Nature. 2005b;436:261–265. doi: 10.1038/nature03715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: Dwight E Bergles1

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Sonic hedgehog signaling in astrocytes mediates cell-type-specific synaptic organization" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by two peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Summary:

This study examined the role of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling in shaping dendritic spine development, excitatory synapse formation and neuronal excitability in the mouse cerebral cortex through modulation of astrocytes. Prior studies have shown that neuronal release of Shh controls Kir4.1 expression in Bergmann glia and some astrocytes, and selective loss of Smoothened (Smo), an obligate Shh co-receptor, leads to astrocyte hypertrophy and upregulation of GFAP. Although neuronal Shh is involved in synapse formation between Layer 5 and Layer 2/3 cortical neurons, functional links between astrocyte Shh signaling and neuronal development have not been demonstrated. Here, the authors report that Gli1, the transcriptional effector of Shh signaling, is expressed in astrocytes in a laminar-specific manner, with significant expression in astrocytes within cortical Layers 4 and 5. Conditional deletion of Smo from astrocytes led to accelerated development of spines on the apical dendrites of Layer 5 pyramidal neurons and greater spine density in adulthood. Using in vivo time lapse imaging, the authors found that dendritic spines from juvenile astrocytic Smo-cKO mice had fewer filopodia, and adult cKO mice had a larger proportion of stable spines. Furthermore, whole-cell patch clamp recording of Layer 5 neurons showed that both spontaneous and miniature EPSCs were enhanced (frequency and amplitude) when astrocyte Smo was deleted. Astrocytes with Smo deletion exhibited lower Kir4.1 immunoreactivity, upregulation of GFAP and enhanced process arborization, changes that were accompanied by an increase in excitability of layer 5 neurons, suggesting that Shh signaling in astrocytes leads to both structural and functional changes in nearby neurons. Together, these studies substantially extend our knowledge about the molecular mechanisms used to coordinate neuron-astrocyte interactions during development and point to an important role for Shh in shaping circuit formation and neuronal development by modulating the properties of astrocytes.

Essential revisions:

1) The authors need to show some form of validation that mGFAP-Cre is efficiently reducing Smo expression in astrocytes. It is possible, even with constitutive Cre expression, that recombination may not occur at both floxed alleles.

2) In light of the Harwell et al., 2012 study which showed that pyramidal neurons utilize Shh signaling to regulate dendrite growth and spines in Layer V neurons, and the fact that Smo deletion with mGFAP-Cre is not exclusive to astrocytes, the authors should consider softening their conclusions. Given the limited recombination in other cell types observed with the mGFAP-Cre line, it is likely that the effects observed are related to loss of Smo in astrocytes. However, it is still possible that loss of Smo in other cells contributes to the observed changes. Also, the authors should soften their conclusion that Shh from neurons is mediating the observed changes given that this aspect was not experimentally tested. Regardless of where Shh comes from, it would not alter the conclusion that Shh-dependent signaling in astrocytes alters dendritic spine dynamics and neuronal excitability.

3) The authors should improve illustration of the spine development changes. It is difficult to determine what are spines in Figure 2A and B. This evidence needs to be substantially improved and they should provide representative examples for all of the time points and all of the areas sampled in this figure. The cKO dendrite in Figure 2 seems to be substantially thicker than the WT control. Is this specific to this image, or is this consistent across neurons? If this is a phenotype, please quantify. If not, please choose a different representative dendrite. In Figure 3, it is unclear whether n should refer to spines or to animals. As animals have been subjected to different surgeries, one could argue that n should refer to animals. Please provide further justification for the determination of n in these experiments. The authors should provide additional details about how spines were analyzed and the effectiveness of the custom software in tracking spines should be demonstrated in supplementary material.

4) The results indicate that there are fewer filopodia in juvenile Smo-cKO animals. The authors also cite references supporting a strong correlation between dendritic spine morphology and maturity. To establish whether there are simply fewer filopodial extensions in the Smo-cKO animals, or whether the dendritic spines themselves are more mature, the authors should classify spine morphology as filopodia/intermediate/mushroom-shaped.

5) The authors provide evidence that Shh signaling in astrocytes regulates neuronal excitability by controlling Kir4.1 expression in astrocytes. The data presented only show a correlation between astrocytes changes (decrease in Kir4.1 expression, increase in GFAP and hypertrophy) and neuronal hyperexcitability. The studies would be more impactful if the authors were to explore whether neuronal excitability was directly related to Kir4.1 downregulation, by assessing whether block of Kir4.1 by Ba+ or desipramine in WT neurons elicits a similar increase in excitability.

eLife. 2019 Jun 13;8:e45545. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45545.029

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) The authors need to show some form of validation that mGFAP-Cre is efficiently reducing Smo expression in astrocytes. It is possible, even with constitutive Cre expression, that recombination may not occur at both floxed alleles.

This comment raises two distinct issues – efficiency of recombination and specificity. We have performed qPCR for Smo on whole cortex from mGFAP Smo CKO mice and wild type littermate controls. We observed a 50% reduction in gene expression in CKO mice. The remaining 50% is likely from neurons, which are known to use Boc-mediated Shh signaling (Harwell et al., 2012). These data are now included in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Indeed, we cannot rule out the possibility that recombination may not occur at both floxed alleles. However we previously demonstrated that in mGFAP Smo CKO mice possessing a Gli1lacZ/+ allele, there is a nearly complete loss of Gli1 expression, with no change in the number of astrocytes (Garcia et al., 2010), demonstrating effective disruption of Shh signaling, and arguing against inefficient recombination. Nevertheless, even if both alleles fail to undergo recombination, this does not change our underlying observation that targeted disruption of Shh signaling in astrocytes produces deficits in establishing the mature circuitry of the cortex. Indeed, it should be noted that we observe reliable structural, physiological, and molecular phenotypes, suggesting that if recombination is inefficient in our mice, even more severe or additional phenotypes, would be expected.

Specificity of recombination in astrocytes is demonstrated by our single cell analysis in mGFAPCre;Ai14 mice showing that 95% of cortical astrocytes identified by S100β are recombined, whereas only 1.3% of neurons are recombined. Because individual floxed alleles possess distinct recombination efficiencies, and because we cannot rule out the possibility that a greater proportion of neurons might be recombined in mGFAP Smo CKO mice, we also demonstrated that a broader deletion of Smo using a neuron-specific Cre driver (CamKinaseIIα) does not produce the same phenotypes. We now highlight these data more clearly in Figure 2, and provide further discussion of these points.

2) In light of the Harwell et al., study which showed that pyramidal neurons utilize Shh signaling to regulate dendrite growth and spines in Layer V neurons, and the fact that Smo deletion with mGFAP-Cre is not exclusive to astrocytes, the authors should consider softening their conclusions. Given the limited recombination in other cell types observed with the mGFAP-Cre line, it is likely that the effects observed are related to loss of Smo in astrocytes. However, it is still possible that loss of Smo in other cells contributes to the observed changes. Also, the authors should soften their conclusion that Shh from neurons is mediating the observed changes given that this aspect was not experimentally tested. Regardless of where Shh comes from, it would not alter the conclusion that Shh-dependent signaling in astrocytes alters dendritic spine dynamics and neuronal excitability.

We appreciate the reviewers’ caution. We agree that we cannot rule out Shh from non-neuronal sources, and have now softened this point, as suggested. We have also provided further discussion about the potential contribution of other cell types to our observed phenotypes.

3) The authors should improve illustration of the spine development changes. It is difficult to determine what are spines in Figure 2A and B. This evidence needs to be substantially improved and they should provide representative examples for all of the time points and all of the areas sampled in this figure. The cKO dendrite in Figure 2 seems to be substantially thicker than the WT control. Is this specific to this image, or is this consistent across neurons? If this is a phenotype, please quantify. If not, please choose a different representative dendrite. In Figure 3, it is unclear whether n should refer to spines or to animals. As animals have been subjected to different surgeries, one could argue that n should refer to animals. Please provide further justification for the determination of n in these experiments. The authors should provide additional details about how spines were analyzed and the effectiveness of the custom software in tracking spines should be demonstrated in supplementary material.

We have now provided improved illustration of dendrites and spines, as suggested. Our initial images were derived from brightfield microscopy, using DIC optics. Although these images failed to capture what can reliably be seen on the microscope, we aimed to illustrate our method for performing the spine density analysis in fixed tissues, as described. We now provide maximum projection images from GFP fluorescence captured by confocal microscopy.

We thank the reviewer for pointing out the apparent difference in thickness in the dendrites CKO and wild type. We did not observe any correlation between thickness of the dendrite and genotype in our original analysis, and this was confirmed again in the process of selecting new representative dendrites/images for Figure 2, as described above.

In Figure 3, our n’s were originally reported as cell number. However we reanalyzed the data using animal number, as suggested, and updated Figure 3 accordingly.

We now provide additional details on spine analysis in the Materials and methods, as suggested. Briefly, individual protrusions identified in two z-stacks from the same mouse collected over a defined time interval were analyzed side by side using ImageJ. The presence or absence of individual protrusions was marked using ImageJ’s Cell Counter Plugin, and the turnover ratio was calculated, as described. Analysis was performed by trained observers, blind to genotype. For longitudinal analysis of spine lifetime, the individual features identified in our manual ImageJ analysis were then imported into custom MATLAB-based code, designed to identify corresponding images of previously identified spines, from z-stacks collected at time points beyond the initial 2 day or 7 day period. Corresponding images of an individual spine, across all time points collected are displayed, and the observer scores its presence or absence across all time points. This procedure is now described more fully in Materials and methods, and we also include an additional figure depicting the custom software (Figure 3—figure supplement 2).

4) The results indicate that there are fewer filopodia in juvenile Smo-cKO animals. The authors also cite references supporting a strong correlation between dendritic spine morphology and maturity. To establish whether there are simply fewer filopodial extensions in the Smo-cKO animals, or whether the dendritic spines themselves are more mature, the authors should classify spine morphology as filopodia/intermediate/mushroom-shaped.

We thank the reviewer for this insightful suggestion. We classified the morphology of spines into mature (mushroom-shaped) and intermediate, as suggested. Protrusions exhibiting a bright, bulbous head were scored as mushroom, thin protrusions exhibiting a relatively dim, small head, or no head, were scored as intermediate. Several examples are provided in Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Although WT and CKO mice showed comparable levels of mature spines in juvenile mice, CKO mice showed a relatively smaller fraction of mature spines in adults, compared to their WT controls. A relatively higher proportion of spines were identified as intermediate in juvenile CKO mice compared to controls. While these results were not statistically significant, these data suggest that in CKO mice, a larger fraction of protrusions are mature, or undergoing maturation, compared to WT mice. Because our initial analysis of spine stability did not distinguish between mushroom or intermediate spines, and because our longitudinal analysis of spine stability showed increased survival of spines in CKO mice, this suggests that these intermediate protrusions reflect transitional morphologies as spines undergo maturation and become more stable. These data are shown in Figures 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

5) The authors provide evidence that Shh signaling in astrocytes regulates neuronal excitability by controlling Kir4.1 expression in astrocytes. The data presented only show a correlation between astrocytes changes (decrease in Kir4.1 expression, increase in GFAP and hypertrophy) and neuronal hyperexcitability. The studies would be more impactful if the authors were to explore whether neuronal excitability was directly related to Kir4.1 downregulation, by assessing whether block of Kir4.1 by Ba+ or desipramine in WT neurons elicits a similar increase in excitability.

We agree that specific block of Kir4.1 channels are an important experiment that would enable us to point more directly to Kir4.1 as a molecular mechanism underlying our observed phenotypes. However, neither Ba+ nor desiprimine are specific for Kir4.1, and both target other inward rectifying K+ channels or adrenergic receptors, respectively, in neurons. We examined the response of cortical neurons in WT slices to desiprimine, and found that at low current injections, the response of neurons is higher in the presence of drug, compared to before drug. However at higher currents, neurons failed to exhibit continued stimulus-dependent responses in response to drug and instead, plateau. While these data partially phenocopies our original result in CKO slices, these data do not necessarily provide more direct evidence for Kir4.1. We have now softened our conclusion that loss of Kir4.1 mediates neuronal hyperexcitability in Smo CKO mice and provided additional discussion of alternative mechanisms underlying this phenotype.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Distribution of Gli1 astrocytes in cortical layers.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.004
    Figure 2—source data 1. Analysis of spine density.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.010
    Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Quantification of Smo mRNA.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.008
    Figure 3—source data 1. Spine turnover data.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.014
    Figure 3—source code 1. MATLAB-based custom-written code for longitudinal analysis of spine dynamics.

    SpineTracking generates a longitudinal tracking file that stores the x,y,z location of each feature, along with its status (missing/present/filopodia) for each tile, LongSurvival gathers all the tiles and pools the data to give the final survival curves for each mouse, and FeatLong is used for examining each feature individually.

    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.015
    Figure 4—source data 1. Measurement of gene expression.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.018
    Figure 5—source data 1. Physiological properties of neurons and response to current injections.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.021
    Figure 5—source data 2. Measurements of spontaneous and miniature EPSCs.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.022
    Figure 6—source data 1. Sholl analysis of cortical astrocytes.
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.025
    Transparent reporting form
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45545.026

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-6.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES