ABSTRACT
Enterococci are unusually well adapted for survival and persistence in a variety of adverse environments, including on inanimate surfaces in the hospital environment and at sites of infection. This intrinsic ruggedness undoubtedly played a role in providing opportunities for enterococci to interact with other overtly drug-resistant microbes and acquire additional resistances on mobile elements. The rapid rise of antimicrobial resistance among hospital-adapted enterococci has rendered hospital-acquired infections a leading therapeutic challenge. With about a quarter of a genome of additional DNA conveyed by mobile elements, there are undoubtedly many more properties that have been acquired that help enterococci persist and spread in the hospital setting and cause diseases that have yet to be defined. Much remains to be learned about these ancient and rugged microbes, particularly in the area of pathogenic mechanisms involved with human diseases.
INTRODUCTION
Enterococci are hardy, Gram-positive cocci that are common residents of the gastrointestinal tracts of nearly all land animals, including humans. While they are a core member of the microbiome, they are also capable of causing a variety of severe infections, most often among antibiotic-treated hospitalized patients with perturbed intestinal microbiota. Here, we present an overview of the pathogenicity of enterococci and discuss the most prominent features of this hospital-associated pathogen.
The origin of the term “enterococcus” dates to the end of the 19th century when Thiercelin described a saprophytic Gram-positive coccus of intestinal origin capable of causing infection (1, 2). In the same year, a very detailed picture of enterococcal pathogenesis was reported by MacCallum and Hastings (3), who isolated and characterized an organism (now believed to be a cytolytic strain of Enterococcus faecalis) from a lethal case of acute endocarditis. Termed Micrococcus zymogenes by these authors, bacteria recovered from the blood and cardiac tissue of the patient and inoculated into pure culture were able to recapitulate elements of endocarditis in animals, satisfying Koch’s postulates and establishing Enterococcus as a bona fide pathogen of humans and animals. From these early descriptions, the paradigm of enterococci as a commensal opportunist was established. More than a century later, enterococci are widely recognized as leading hospital pathogens (4, 5).
Infections occurring mainly among hospitalized patients and caused by microbes of the genus Enterococcus (most notably, E. faecalis and Enterococcus faecium) include urinary tract infections, bacteremia, intra-abdominal infections, and endocarditis (6). Enterococci are now the third most common hospital-acquired pathogen, causing 14% of hospital-acquired infections in the United States between 2011 and 2014, an increase from 11% in 2007 (4, 7). In addition to hospital-acquired infections, enterococci are responsible for 5 to 20% of community-acquired endocarditis (8).
This review focuses on the mechanisms by which enterococci cause human disease, with particular attention given to advances in the field since the last edition of this text (9). Additional perspectives and information may be found in the complete volume on enterococcal biology (10).
BIOLOGY AND CHARACTERISTICS
Enterococci can be easily isolated from a wide range of hosts, including invertebrates, insects, and mammals (Fig. 1). This host range highlights the ability of enterococci to survive a diversity of innate host defenses in the gut (11). In humans, enterococci are one of the earliest colonizers of the infant gut, and as a result are core members of the intestinal microbiome (12, 13). They are also common among commensal microbiota of domesticated and wild animals and can cause infections in these animals as well (14–16). Due to their widespread occurrence among humans and animals, they are readily isolated from the environments inhabited by those hosts, often associated with plants, soil, and water (17, 18). Because of their numerous auxotrophies, enterococci persist in the environment but do not likely proliferate to high numbers there.
FIGURE 1.

Animal hosts that have been associated with enterococcal colonization. A simplified tree of life with blue shading indicating animals from which enterococci have been isolated. Corresponding geologic periods are indicated on the left. Reproduced with permission from reference 11.
Enterococci were formerly classified as group D streptococci (19) but were given genus status in 1984 (20) based on nucleic acid hybridization studies that showed a more distant relationship to the streptococci. The genus Enterococcus contains over 50 species and appears to have branched from its last common ancestor approximately 425 million years ago (21). Members of this genus are endowed with intrinsic properties that confer the ability to survive host defenses and compete in the intestinal tract and then persist and spread in the natural environment or hospital, leading to colonization of new hosts. Among these traits are the ability to grow over wide temperature and pH ranges, survive desiccation, and grow in the presence of 6.5% NaCl and 40% bile salts (17).
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE
The challenge of disease caused by enterococci is compounded by their limited susceptibility to antibiotics, due to both intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistances. Enterococci are intrinsically resistant to cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, and streptogramins (6, 22). Intrinsic resistance of enterococci undoubtedly positions them well to acquire additional resistances on mobile genetic elements. In the antibiotic-treated patient, enterococci accumulate to high numbers (23) and coexist in intimate association with other overtly antibiotic-resistant microbes, the precise environment to enhance the probability of contact between enterococci and other species harboring new resistances on mobile elements, leading to element acquisition.
Because enterococci are not killed by many β-lactams, new approaches to treatment were sought. The discovery that aminoglycosides were synergistic with β-lactams and could achieve cidality (24) resulted in combination therapy becoming the standard of care. However, only a few years later, aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci was reported (25) and found to be due to the acquisition of a plasmid-borne resistance factor. High-level resistance to aminoglycosides is conferred by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, especially a bifunctional enzyme (26), and mobile elements conferring this trait have spread throughout the enterococci (27). Further compromising combination therapy, enterococci that expressed a β-lactamase have been identified (28), but these remain surprisingly rare.
Vancomycin was introduced in the late 1950s (29) and because of its limited spectrum and intravenous dosing received limited application in hospitalized patients with β-lactam allergies and infections due to organisms with other antibiotic resistances (30). Vancomycin was found to be effective against aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci (31) and became a leading alternative therapy in the late 1970s and early 1980s (32). However, vancomycin resistance emerged in the mid-1980s—first in Europe (33, 34) and then in the United States (35). Enterococci resistant to vancomycin are now globally disseminated, with as many as 80% of E. faecium isolates being resistant to vancomycin in some hospitals (4, 36).
The rapid rise of vancomycin resistance in enterococci at the beginning of the 21st century raised alarms, because it represented the loss of an important bactericidal, last-line therapy. Daptomycin was shown to be effective against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (37), but its value was found to be limited by the rate of daptomycin resistance development during the course of treatment (38–40). Resistant isolates had mutations in several genes that affect cell membrane composition and charge, including the cardiolipin synthase cls, the glycerophosphoryl-diester-phosphodiesterase gdpD, and the stress-sensing response component liaF (41, 42). Confounding a precise understanding of its mechanism of action, Staphylococcus aureus was observed to alter different pathways in achieving daptomycin resistance (43). Furthermore, resistance-conferring mutations derived in enterococci in vitro only partially overlap with those that arise in vivo, potentially because of differences in lipid incorporation from the environment into the enterococcal membrane (44). Lipidomic studies of daptomycin-resistant strains showed differences in lipid profiles compared to sensitive strains, particularly in phosphatidylglycerols, cardiolipins, and glycolipids (45).
Linezolid, the first oxazolidinone antibiotic, was approved by the FDA in 2000, and its introduction into clinical use was quickly followed by the emergence of linezolid-resistant VRE strains in the United States in 2001 (46) and in the United Kingdom in 2002 (47). Sequencing of the resistant isolates revealed a G2576U mutation in the 23S ribosomal RNA subunit (48). This mutation was also seen in resistant organisms isolated from a gnotobiotic mouse model of infection (49), where its occurrence was found to depend on the dose of antibiotic that reached the intestine. A linezolid-resistant isolate from Thailand subsequently was shown to have acquired the cfr methyltransferase on a plasmid, leading to methylation of position A2503 in the 23S rRNA and causing high-level resistance (50).
A third antibiotic that has found utility in treating VRE is the glycylcycline tigecycline. It has been used successfully, alone and in combination with other antibiotics, to treat VRE infection, but resistance has also emerged. A study of 73 tigecycline-nonsusceptible E. faecium and E. faecalis isolates collected from 2007 to 2015 found mutations in various efflux pumps that were identified and associated with tigecycline resistance (51). Serially passaged E. faecium in vitro in the presence of tigecycline selected for mutations in ribosomal protein subunit rpsJ, but this mutation has not yet been functionally validated (51, 52). Nonetheless, enterococci appear able to evolve resistance to antibiotics of all classes that have so far been introduced to practice.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERSISTENCE
As implied by the clonality of infection, epidemiological studies highlight person-to-person transmission of endemic strains within the hospital (53–55), implying that enterococci persist for extended periods in the hospital environment. Transmission occurs through contact with health care personnel and inanimate objects such as bedrails, nursing station keyboards, hospital drapery, and ear-probe thermometers (56). Enterococci are unusually resistant to common antiseptics and disinfectants, as well UV radiation, starvation, and desiccation (21, 57, 58). The ability to survive nutrient-poor environments as well as desiccation has led some to speculate that enterococci may enter a viable but nonculturable state as an adaptation to poor growth conditions (59–61), but details of such a mechanism have yet to be elucidated.
Studies have examined the environmental ruggedness mainly of E. faecalis (62–70), which develops tolerance to otherwise lethal levels of bile salts and detergents, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate, if first subcultured in the presence of sublethal levels (62). This phenomenon likely contributes to the ability of enterococci to survive the cleaning regimens employed in most hospitals as part of infection control programs. Regulatory systems govern the adaptive response to environmental insults (71, 72). In a study by Hancock and Perego (71), inactivation of a response regulator, designated RR06, led to an increased sensitivity to heat stress (growth at 46°C), as well as detergent stress (0.003% sodium dodecyl sulfate). Le Breton et al. (72) showed that another response regulator, RR10, negatively regulates the heat shock proteins DnaK and GroEL. Inactivation of the rr10 gene resulted in acid sensitivity but also enhanced survival at 50°C.
To identify the genetic contributors to this intrinsic ruggedness, a spectrum of enterococcal species, including clinical isolates as well as species never reported to be associated with human infection, were compared for resistances to chemical compounds as well as environmental stresses (21). All enterococci were found to be intrinsically much more resistant to most insults than other related microbes, indicating that many of the underlying traits were acquired as the genus branched from its ancestors. The two enterococcal species that are most pathogenic to humans, E. faecalis and E. faecium, showed the greatest resistance to desiccation and starvation (21). These two species also show high levels of resistance to the common hospital disinfectants chloroxylenol and chlorhexidine. The molecular mechanisms that contribute to these phenotypes were narrowed to a set of 126 genes that distinguished enterococci from ancestors (21). Additionally, the two-component system ChtRS was recently identified as in important regulator of chlorhexidine resistance in E. faecium (73).
PATHOGENIC MECHANISMS
For enterococci to cause disease, several barriers must first be overcome. An initial barrier is the ability to overcome colonization resistance provided by competing microbes, and host defenses such as gastric acid and bile, and colonize the intestinal tract. From this reservoir the bacteria can amplify in number and spread to sites vulnerable to infection. A basic prediction from such a model is that the probability of infection should be a function of the intestinal burden of bacteria in the gut reservoir—the more bacteria, the greater the probability of contamination of a potential infection site in numbers large enough to overcome host defenses. Indeed, colonization of the gastrointestinal tract has been shown to be directly associated with risk of infection (23, 74). Infection occurs when enterococci overwhelm host defenses, when they replicate at rates that exceed clearance, and when pathologic changes result through direct toxin activity, or infection occurs indirectly by bystander damage from the inflammatory response (75, 76).
HUMAN COLONIZATION
Enterococci are core but numerically minor members of the human microbiome (77). The occurrence of two species, E. faecalis and E. faecium, in similar abundance, suggests that neither evolved in humans but, rather, likely entered the primate lineage early and from organisms consumed from lower in the food chain. Both E. faecalis and E. faecium are found in relative abundance in human feces (105 to 107 organisms per gram) (78) but typically represent less than 1% of the total microbial population (17). “Colonization resistance” (79) is a term applied to the challenge an organism faces in colonizing a stable, established community. It is a main mechanism of innate defense of the gastrointestinal tract. Colonization and proliferation of hospital-adapted lineages of enterococci are usually associated with antibiotic-induced disruption of the community structure (80). Therefore, effectively managing the human microbiome in health and disease represents a theoretically promising strategy for preventing hospital infection.
A primary barrier to invading the gut consortium and colonization by orally acquired microbes is gastric pH, which is inhospitable for most microorganisms, including enterococci. Compromise of this barrier enhances the oral acquisition of enterococci from a contaminated environment. In the intensive care unit setting in particular, patients are placed on H2-receptor antagonists as prophylaxis for treating stress ulcers; the consequence of this action is a pH increase from pH 2 to pH 3.5 to 5.3, depending on the antagonist employed (81). In a study by Başaran et al. (82), H2-receptor antagonists were shown to promote colonization of the small bowel, as well as translocation of enteric bacteria from the intestinal tract to extraintestinal tissues.
Several studies have examined the ability of enterococci to tolerate acidic pH (64, 83). Flahaut et al. (64) demonstrated that exposure of E. faecalis to a sublethal pH level (pH 4.8) for 15 to 30 minutes protected the organism from a normally lethal challenge at pH 3.2, suggesting an adaptive response to changing acid stress. Suzuki and colleagues (83) showed that an E. faecalis mutant defective in F1-F0 H+-ATPase activity was unable to grow at a pH of <6. The H+-ATPase is used to regulate the cytoplasmic pH of E. faecalis by proton extrusion, and this enzyme has been shown to be activated at low pH (83). Teng et al. (84) identified a two-component regulatory system, termed EtaRS, which appears to be involved in acid stress response and virulence. Inactivation of the response regulator, EtaR, results in increased acid sensitivity and decreased virulence in a murine peritonitis model.
Colonization resistance is also imposed by the stability of a mature complex community of gut microbes. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, many of which possess little or no antienterococcal activity, destabilizes this community by removing susceptible members (85–87), opening opportunities for invasion by new organisms. In a study designed to examine the persistence and density of colonization by vancomycin-resistant E. faecium in a murine model, Donskey et al. (88) showed that suppression of the anaerobic microflora by the use of antimicrobials that target this microbial population resulted in increased colonization density and prolonged VRE persistence. This observation highlights the importance of the anaerobic flora in suppressing enterococcal growth within the intestinal microenvironment. Several other studies have also examined factors that lead to overgrowth of enterococci, especially VRE, in the gastrointestinal tract of hospitalized patients. Treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics, especially cephalosporins and metronidazole, to which enterococci are intrinsically resistant, leads to clearance of commensals and overgrowth of enterococci (80, 89). In extreme cases, hospitalized patients treated with these antibiotics develop a near monoculture of VRE in their intestine and are at high risk for enterococcal bacteremia and other enterococcal infections (80). Factors that limit the outgrowth of E. faecium in the antibiotic-perturbed gut include reduced expression of the host innate immune factor RegIIIγ, which results indirectly from the loss of Gram-negative members of the gut microflora (90). RegIIIγ production relies on signaling through Toll-like receptor-5 and interleukin-22 (IL-22), and supplementation of Toll-like receptor agonists has been shown to restore RegIIIγ expression and suppress E. faecium growth (90). In mice, the IL-22 signaling pathway and, in particular, the IL-22 receptor has been shown to be required for E. faecalis colonization resistance. Il22ra1–/– mice were observed to be particularly susceptible to E. faecalis overgrowth and subsequent systemic dissemination (91). This restriction of E. faecalis outgrowth is controlled in part by fucosylated glycans, which are downregulated in Il22ra1–/– mice. Oral supplementation of fucosylated glycans was shown to promote diversity of the gut microbiota and restore the growth restriction of E. faecalis (91).
In addition to antibiotic and host immune factors, hospital-adapted strains of enterococci are endowed with properties that allow them to colonize microniches that are likely less suitable for colonization by commensal strains. For example, some hospital-associated strains of E. faecalis contain an additional bile salt hydrolase (92). E. faecalis also produces extracellular superoxide (93), leading to DNA damage in colonic epithelial cells (94) and chromosomal instability (95), potentially relating to local inflammation, changes in the nutritional properties of the mucosa, and development of colorectal cancer. Enterococci also have been associated with inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Enterococcal abundance, particularly of E. faecium, is higher in fecal samples from Crohn’s disease patients compared to healthy controls (96, 97). Increased E. faecalis abundance and anti-E. faecalis antibodies have also been observed in ulcerative colitis patients (98). Germ-free IL-10 knockout mice colonized with E. faecalis develop chronic inflammatory bowel disease-like symptoms (99), highlighting the bacteria’s ability to perpetuate gut inflammation. A subset of virulence factors in E. faecalis, including the metalloprotease GelE, enterococcal polysaccharide antigen Epa, and cell surface-associated lipoprotein Lgt, were shown to influence induction of inflammatory bowel disease in these mice (Table 1) (99).
TABLE 1.
Enterococcal virulence factors
| Virulence factor | Description | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Cytolysina | Hemolysin/bacteriocin, lyses a broad range of eukaryotic and Gram-positive cells | 128, 126, 129, 218 |
| Gelatinasea | Secreted zinc metalloprotease | 216, 221, 222 |
| Serine proteasea | Secreted serine protease | 216, 221, 222 |
| Hyaluronidaseb | Degrades hyaluronic acid | 236 |
| Espa,b | Cell wall anchored protein, enhances biofilm formation and colonization of bladder epithelium | 92, 237 |
| Aggregation substancea,b | Cell wall anchored protein, involved in conjugation and adhesion to eukaryotic cells | 128, 132, 214, 267 |
| Acea,b | Cell wall anchored protein, collagen binding protein | 135, 136, 138, 139 |
| Epaa,b | Enterococcal polysaccharide antigen, anti-phagocytic cell wall polysaccharide | 200 |
| Cpsa,b | Capsular polysaccharide, antiphagocytic cell wall polysaccharide | 194, 196 |
| LTAa,b | Lipoteichoic acid, enterococcal group antigen, binding substance for conjugation | 214, 268 |
| Toxic metabolitesa,b | Reactive oxygen species: extracellular superoxide, hydrogen peroxide | 94, 239 |
Virulence factors identified in E. faecalis.
Virulence factors identified in E. faecium.
Enterococci must compete with other microbes in the gut for space, binding sites, and nutrients. Enterococci have long been known to be prolific producers of bacteriocins, many of which are encoded by mobile elements (100, 101). Plasmid pPD1, harbored by some E. faecalis strains, encodes a bacteriocin that inhibits other E. faecalis strains, eventually leading under some conditions to strain replacement in vivo (102). Importantly, the bacteriocin-expressing strain was able to reduce the intestinal load of VRE in a cocolonization study, highlighting the potential therapeutic value of such agents.
The apparently hasty accretion of mobile elements by enterococci affects their ability to compete in surprising ways. It was recently shown that commensal E. faecalis is able to induce self-killing of the vancomycin-resistant strain V583, through the production of the pheromone peptide cOB1 (103). This pheromone induces a cascade of events that involves expression of conjugation-associated functions on a pheromone-responsive plasmid resident within V583, which then engage in a lethal cross talk with a gene or genes in another mobile genetic element in the chromosome of V583, inducing death of V583 by an as yet unknown mechanism.
The ability to obtain nutrients within the competitive environment of the gut is an important aspect of enterococcal colonization efficiency (104). Within E. faecium, the two main clades, A and B, differ in the availability of carbohydrate utilization pathways. Strains in clade A1, which includes most infection-associated strains, express more transporters and metabolic pathways for the utilization of carbohydrates derived from the gut mucosa, as opposed to the diet, such as mucins and epithelial cell glycosidic surface decorations (104). Inactivation of a phosphotransferase system related to this ability reduced gut colonization in an antibiotic-treated mouse model (104, 105). Clade B strains do not possess this pathway (104), highlighting ecological differences between pathogenic and commensal strains. Meanwhile, clade B commensal E. faecium strains outcompete clade A strains in the murine intestinal tract in the absence of antibiotics (106).
Antagonisms within the gut community also influence colonization. Among commensals, Barnesiella species have been observed to be antagonistic to enterococcal colonization (107). Colonization resistance to VRE could also be artificially effected with a four-species cocktail containing Bacteroides sartorii, Parabacteroides distasonis, Clostridium bolteae, and Blautia producta (108). To colonize and establish residence within the gut, then, multidrug-resistant strains of enterococci must successfully navigate the hazards of innate host defenses and enter a destabilized consortium lacking overt antagonists.
TRANSLOCATION FROM THE GUT INTO THE BLOODSTREAM
Enterococal overgrowth in the colon increases the chance, by simple numeric probability, of dissemination into the bloodstream and contamination of other body sites in numbers large enough to establish infection (Fig. 2). Mechanisms that contribute to enterococcal translocation are still being discovered. In some cases, enterococci may be phagocytosed by intestinal epithelial cells, dendritic cells, or other tissue-resident leukocytes and transported across the intestinal wall to the underlying lymph system. Failure to kill the phagocytosed organism could then lead to abscess formation in reticuloendothelial organs and systemic spread (109). Gentry-Weeks et al. (110) showed that E. faecalis possesses the ability to survive for up to 72 hours in peritoneal macrophages. Wells et al. (111, 112) induced intestinal E. faecalis overgrowth by antibiotic treatment and observed organisms adhering to epithelial surfaces of the ileum, cecum, and colon. They also showed that enterococci possess the ability to translocate from the intestinal lumen into the mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, and spleen (111, 112).
FIGURE 2.

Routes of dissemination of enterococci from the intestinal reservoir of a hospitalized patient. Bacteria from the intestine can seed infections throughout the body and contaminate surfaces, leading to patient-to-patient spread. Reproduced with permission from reference 122.
Bacteria also diffuse through the gut barrier at low levels, and enterococci may gain access to the bloodstream that way. Inert particles the size of bacteria, and without any special properties, penetrate the gut mucosal barrier (113); special invasive properties do not appear to be essential for at least some level of translocation into the bloodstream. In a healthy, immune-competent host, innate defenses are well equipped to eliminate such invaders. So long as the microbes leaking into the bloodstream and occurring in the lymphatics are easily killed, such as the predominating anaerobes in the healthy gut community, there is little ill effect. However, because enterococci persist in phagocytic cells, their extraintestinal accumulation may more readily lead to infection, especially in an immunocompromised or disease-stressed patient.
A variety of enterococcal factors have been examined for their role in colonization and translocation out of the gastrointestinal tract. Olmsted et al. (114) found a plasmid-encoded surface protein, aggregation substance (AS), to promote internalization of E. faecalis by cultured intestinal epithelial cells (HT-29). To further dissect the functional domains of AS involved in internalization by HT-29 cells, Waters et al. (115, 116) examined the various domains of AS to determine their roles in this process. Surprisingly, the aggregation domain, and not the N-terminal RGD motif of AS, was found to be important for internalization by HT-29 cells (116). An additional finding from this study was the apparent requirement for a cofactor (likely lipoteichoic acid), because expression of AS in the binding substance mutant INY3000 failed to efficiently internalize. In a subsequent study it was shown that the amino-terminal aggregation domain of the protein could bind efficiently to purified lipoteichoic acid (LTA) as well as LTA purified from INY3000, suggesting that another cell component other than LTA was responsible for the cooperative internalization of E. faecalis by HT-29 cells (115).
BACTEREMIA
Enterococcal bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with a high level of mortality. In a recent large survey study of Canadian hospitals (117), the incidence of enterococcal BSI of hospitalized patients was 6.9 per 100,000, with most cases due to E. faecalis (4.5 per 100,000). The incidence of enterococcal BSI increased between 2008 and 2014 (9 to 14 per 100,000) in Switzerland (118), suggesting that enterococcal BSIs are on the rise. Overall, mortality from nosocomial enterococcal BSI is quite high, ranging from 25 to 50% (119, 120).
Most cases of enterococcal BSI are thought to result from translocation of enterococci from the gut into the bloodstream. Other routes of infection include along intravenous lines, endocarditis, urinary tract infections, and abscesses (109, 121, 122). The risk factors for mortality associated with enterococcal bacteremia include severity of illness (based on APACHE II scores), patient age, and use of third-generation cephalosporins or metronidazole (123). Huycke et al. (54) found that patients infected with hemolytic, gentamicin-resistant E. faecalis strains had a 5-fold increased risk for death within three weeks compared to patients with nonhemolytic, gentamicin-susceptible strains. Moreover, mode of treatment was not associated with outcome, discounting the direct contribution of aminoglycoside resistance. In another study, Caballero-Granado et al. (124) analyzed the clinical outcome, including mortality, for bacteremia caused by Enterococcus spp. with and without high-level gentamicin resistance. Mortality associated with high-level gentamicin resistance (29%) was not significantly different from gentamicin-susceptible strains (28%). Taken together, these two studies suggest that high-level aminoglycoside resistance itself does not explain clinical outcome and that the presence of other factors, such as the E. faecalis cytolysin (hemolysin), appears to contribute to enhanced lethality. In support of the latter finding, the E. faecalis cytolysin has been shown to result in acute toxicity in a number of animal models. Cytolysin significantly lowers the 50% lethal dose of the infecting strain for mice (125–127). As will be discussed later, the cytolysin also contributes to the acute toxicity of lupine endocarditis and endophthalmitis models (128, 129) and contributes to nematode killing in Caenorhabditis elegans (130).
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
In a nosocomial population surveyed between 2011 and 2014, enterococci were the most commonly isolated Gram-positive bacteria from catheter-associated urinary tract infections, with over 20,000 cases reported to the CDC National Healthcare Safety Network between 2011 and 2014 (4). Of these cases, just over 50% were caused by E. faecalis, followed by “other Enterococcus species” (∼30%) and E. faecium (∼20%). Most worrisome was the fact that ∼85% of E. faecium isolates were vancomycin resistant, with the fraction of resistant isolates increasing each year (4).
A few studies have been aimed at understanding the interaction of enterococci with uroepithelial tissue (131, 132). Kreft et al. (132) showed a potential role for the plasmid-encoded AS in the adhesion of enterococci to renal epithelial cells. E. faecalis harboring the pheromone-responsive plasmid pAD1, or various isogenic derivatives, were better able to bind to the LLC-PK cultured pig renal tubular cell line than plasmid-free bacteria. Their findings also showed that a synthetic peptide containing the fibronectin motif, Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser, could inhibit binding. This structural motif mediates the interaction between fibronectin and eukaryotic surface receptors of the integrin family (133). Guzmàn and coworkers (131) analyzed the ability of strains of E. faecalis isolated from either urinary tract infections or endocarditis to adhere to urinary tract epithelial cells and to the Girardi heart cell line. Urinary tract infection isolates adhered to urinary tract epithelial cells in vitro, whereas strains from endocarditis adhered efficiently to the Girardi heart cell line, suggesting that environmental adaptations can facilitate interactions with host tissues. Shankar et al. (134) showed that the E. faecalis Esp surface protein colocalizes in the bladder, but not the kidneys, in an ascending urinary tract infection model, suggesting that the protein has tissue specificity for bladder epithelium. Tomita and Ike (135) showed that highly adherent enterococcal urinary tract infection strains recognize the extracellular matrix proteins fibronectin, laminin, and collagen types I, II, IV, and V. One of these strains, AS14, was subjected to transposon mutagenesis with Tn916, and mutants with altered collagen IV and laminin binding were identified. Out of 14 single transposon insertion mutants, 13 mapped to the Ace protein (136–140). The level of adherence of mutants to collagen IV and laminin was 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower than the wild-type strain, but the level of adherence to fibronectin remained the same as that of the wild-type strain. The collagen binding proteins Ace (E. faecalis) and Acm (E. faecium) were originally identified because of their homology to the amino terminal end of Cna, the collagen binding protein from S. aureus (138, 139). The ability of most E. faecalis Ace-positive strains to adhere to collagen and laminin was highly dependent on growth temperature, with binding occurring at 46°C, but not at 37°C (136). No plausible explanation existed for this unusual binding phenotype until observations by Tomita and Ike (135) showed that gelatinase-positive E. faecalis strains adhered poorly to collagen and laminin due to the ability of the protease to cleave these proteins. Shiono and Ike (141) showed that some E. faecalis clinical isolates adhere efficiently to human bladder carcinoma cells, as well as to human bladder epithelial cells, and that these interactions could be inhibited by pretreating the bacteria with fibronectin or trypsin.
More recently, several studies have identified a pilus in E. faecalis (140, 142–145) and have shown that Ebp pili are important for adhesion to the urinary epithelium and urinary catheters through the binding of fibrinogen released into the bladder during catheterization (146–148). In a mouse model of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, E. faecalis infection could be blocked by the administration of antibodies raised against the tip subunit of the Ebp pili, EbpA (149). It is hoped that these antibodies could potentially be used to prevent infection in catheterized patients without the use of antibiotics.
ENDOCARDITIS
Of the infections caused by enterococci, infective endocarditis (IE) is one of the most therapeutically challenging (8, 150). Enterococci account for between 10 and 20% of all cases of IE (151, 152), with E. faecalis causing a majority of these. In IE, bacterial colonization of the endocardium leads to vegetations within the tissue and a biofilm-like matrix surrounding the bacteria, which is difficult to penetrate either by the immune system or by antibiotics (153–155).
Several virulence factors have been identified as playing a major role in the pathogenesis of enterococcal IE, with adhesion to host tissues by cell surface adhesins among the best characterized. In E. faecalis, AS represents a class of large, pheromone-inducible surface proteins involved in mediating cell-cell adhesion as the first step in conjugal plasmid transfer (156). These proteins also appear to be key players in both attachment to heart tissue and the development of biofilm during IE. Three highly related AS proteins have been well studied in this regard, including Asa1, Asc10, and Asp (155, 157, 158). All three proteins appear to aid in cell-cell adhesion and contribute to the exopolymeric matrix that accumulates within the biofilm.
The EfaA antigen is another adhesin that was originally identified as being expressed in serum but not broth culture (159), and database homology searches revealed extensive sequence similarity with several streptococcal adhesins. Shepard and Gilmore (160) showed that of all the suspected E. faecalis virulence factors, EfaA resulted in the most dramatic increase in expression when serum-grown and broth-grown E. faecalis were compared. It is now known that EfaA forms part of a putative ABC-type transporter specific for manganese, along with EfaB and EfaC. Because manganese is tightly sequestered within the mammalian host, it is not unexpected that E. faecalis grown in serum would require the induction of a high-affinity manganese transporter, EfaABC. The induction of the efaCBA operon occurs at relatively low manganese levels, because under high manganese levels the product of the efaR gene, a manganese-responsive transcriptional regulator, represses transcription from the efaCBA operon (159). More recently, EfaR inactivation has also been shown to impair the ability of E. faecalis to form biofilms, survive inside macrophages, and tolerate oxidative stress (161).
Pili encoded by the Ebp gene cluster in E. faecalis have also been shown to be important for both adherence and biofilm formation in IE (162). High titers of antibodies against the EbpABC proteins in patients with enterococcal IE have been demonstrated, indicating that they are expressed at high levels within the host during infection (162). Other important virulence factors in E. faecalis IE include the metalloprotease GelE (163), collagen-binding adhesin Ace (164), fibronectin-binding protein EfbA (165), cytolysin (128), and phosphotransferase system permease BepA (Table 1) (166). A review of the many virulence factors that play a role in E. faecalis endocarditis was recently published (167).
In E. faecium, less is known regarding specific virulence factors and the roles they play in IE. However, the enterococcal surface protein Esp and the collagen-binding protein Acm have been shown to be important for the pathogenesis of E. faecium IE in a rat model of infection (168, 169). In infected animals, E. faecium strains that lack either Esp or Acm were recovered at lower numbers than their wild-type counterparts. Antibodies against both proteins have also been detected in patients diagnosed with E. faecium IE, and pretreatment of bacteria with anti-Acm antibodies derived from an infected patient was shown to reduce the ability of the bacteria to bind to collagen (162, 168). It seems that targeting the adhesive and biofilm development properties of enterococci, in addition to treatment with antibiotics, may be a promising method of treating enterococcal IE in the clinic.
SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS
Enterococci are common causes of surgical site infection at all anatomical sites (170), including the eye (129, 171). The eye affords a unique opportunity to visualize the evolution of such an infection using readily available equipment. Small numbers of organisms injected into the vitreous of a rabbit (129) or mouse (172), can be directly studied using an ophthalmoscope or slit lamp, and declining organ function can be measured quantitatively by electroretinography (173). Enterococci rapidly proliferate at this site, with a 10-μl injection of enterococci suspended in phosphate-buffered saline remaining as a light-refracting bead. After a few hours, the small bead acquires a coat of fibrin. About 12 hours later, the microvessels in the retina begin to dilate and subsequently turn white as they become coated with adherent neutrophils. After about 24 hours, neutrophils can be seen streaming from vessels in the optic nerve head to the infection nidus. These measurement parameters allow various steps in the pathogenesis of infection to be dissected and the roles of various traits expressed by the bacterium to be defined. In this model, the enterococcal cytolysin makes a profound contribution to organ destruction, which is not salvaged by otherwise effective antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory therapy (173). In contrast, identical infections initiated with isogenic cytolysin knockout strains resolved completely with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory therapy, with little loss of organ function. Using this model, GelE and SprE proteases, both controlled by the Fsr quorum-regulated system, were observed to make measurable contributions to virulence in the rabbit model of endophthalmitis (174).
ROOT CANAL FAILURE
Due in part to its resistance to many disinfectants and antiseptics, E. faecalis is an important cause of root canal failure (175, 176). This is particularly true in cases of chronic and persistent periradicular lesions leading to root canal failure, where E. faecalis was isolated in 24 to 77% of cases (176). Genetic analysis of E. faecalis strains isolated from infected root canals suggests that these strains, while not clonal, are highly related and may share additional traits that lead to efficient colonization of the oral cavity (177, 178). Calcium hydroxide, a common disinfectant used within the root canal, has been shown to be ineffective at killing E. faecalis on its own (179), as have other disinfectants such as EDTA and citric acid (180, 181). It appears that the bacteria can resist starvation within the root canal for long periods of time and are then able to be resuscitated by serum that enters the canal from the alveolar bone and periodontal ligament (59). Provided with an adequate food supply, E. faecalis may utilize proteases such as SprE and GelE, and the collagen binding protein Ace, to bind to dentin and form biofilms (182). Once the infection is established, the most efficient treatments include prolonged washing of the canal with sodium hypochlorite or chlorhexidine solution (176). Using chlorhexidine or sodium hypochlorite washes during the initial procedure are thought to be the best options for preventing E. faecalis infection of the root canal and preventing failure.
IMMUNE EVASION
For enterococci to maintain an infection, they must successfully evade both specific and nonspecific host defense mechanisms. Other Gram-positive pathogens possess attributes that allow them to survive in the host in spite of powerful nonspecific host defenses mediated primarily by professional phagocytes, i.e., neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages. These factors include antiphagocytic polysaccharide capsules, antiphagocytic surface proteins, such as the group A streptococcal M protein, and various secreted toxins with direct phagocytic cell toxicity. The most important cell type for clearing bacteria during the early innate immune response to enterococcal infection is neutrophils, with complement and antibody-mediated killing also playing a role (183). Neutropenic mice are less able to clear E. faecium from their bloodstream compared to their wild-type counterparts and show higher inflammatory cytokine levels after intraperitoneal infection (184).
Numerous studies have characterized the host response to enterococcal infection (183, 185–187). E. faecalis has been found to be able to actively cleave the complement protein C3, mediated by the metalloprotease GelE, leading to reduced phagocytosis and higher rates of bacterial survival (188). In a case report, Bottone and colleagues (189) isolated three highly mucoid encapsulated strains of E. faecalis from patients with urinary tract infections. These mucoid isolates appeared to persist longer in the mouse following intraperitoneal injection compared to nonmucoid controls, but crude mortality was not changed, suggesting a role in preventing or delaying phagocytic clearance (190). Once phagocytosed, E. faecalis is able to resist intracellular killing in both polymorphonuclear leukocytes and macrophages (110). In polymorphonuclear leukocytes, opsonized bacteria are more readily killed than unopsonized cells, and AS appears to limit opsonization, leading to survival within phagosomes (191). Recent studies examining E. faecalis survival in macrophages showed that phagosomes containing E. faecalis did not acidify or fuse with autophagosomes, leading to greater bacterial survival (192). E. faecalis is also able to survive the oxidative burst within macrophages, which is in part mediated by the production of catalase (112, 193). Survival within macrophages may also allow for bacterial translocation across the intestinal epithelium, leading to dissemination of E. faecalis throughout the body (112).
Several studies have examined the diversity of cell wall polysaccharides produced by E. faecalis (194–197). Based on genetic and serologic data, E. faecalis capsular polysaccharides fall into four serogroups (197, 198). Antibodies to E. faecalis capsular polysaccharides do, however, cross-protect across the species boundary (196), because antibodies to E. faecalis capsular antigens are reactive with some E. faecium capsular antigens and mediate opsonophagocytosis. The genetic basis for E. faecalis capsular biosynthesis is encoded by the cpsC-K operon (194, 199). In addition to capsular antigens, Murray and coworkers identified another cell wall polysaccharide, called the enterococcal polysaccharide antigen, whose synthesis is encoded by the epa locus (200–202). This pathway appears to be widespread and conserved within E. faecalis, and it has been designated the E. faecalis group antigen (194), analogous to the streptococcal group antigens. Antibodies to the Epa polysaccharide have also been shown to promote opsonophagocytic clearance by neutrophils (200), but this prospect remains controversial (196). A recent study showed that inactivation of a predicted wall teichoic acid biosynthetic gene in E. faecalis caused differences in wall teichoic acid and Epa composition and led to increased susceptibility to complement-mediated killing by neutrophils (203). Finally, enterococcal cell surface-associated polysaccharides have been found to impact gastrointestinal tract colonization and infection in a variety of settings (99, 195, 204–207). The extent to which enterococcal surface-associated polysaccharides could be used as potential vaccines awaits further study.
TISSUE DAMAGE
Following adhesion to host cell surfaces and evasion of the host immune response, the last step in the pathogenesis of enterococcal infection is the production of pathologic changes in the host. Such changes can be induced by the host inflammatory cascade or by direct damage as a result of secreted toxins or proteases, as well as the production of toxic metabolic byproducts. Each of these mechanisms has been observed in studies of E. faecalis pathogenesis.
Indirect Tissue Damage
Enterococcal LTA, also known as the group D streptococcal antigen, has been implicated in a variety of biological processes (204, 208–211). Some properties ascribed to LTA include modulation of the host immune response and mediating the adherence of enterococci to host cells. Bhakdi et al. (212) found LTA from enterococci to be as inflammatory as lipopolysaccharide of Gram-negative bacteria, although more recent findings dispute this claim (213). Strains of E. faecalis defective in enterococcal binding substance (EBS) (which is at least partially derived from LTA) and also defective in the protein adhesin AS did not induce clinical signs of illness when injected intraventricularly into rabbits (214). While EBS+AS– or EBS–AS+ strains caused signs of illness and pericardiac inflammation, all rabbits injected with the EBS+AS+ strain developed illness and died. Surprisingly little inflammation was observed in rabbits injected with the EBS+AS+ strain, despite the lethality observed. The authors state that such observations are consistent with the presence of a superantigen. The presence of LTA (EBS) and AS together may mediate effects on the host immune response that differ from those seen when either component acts alone.
Direct Tissue Damage
The enterococcal cytolysin and two proteases, a zinc metalloprotease (gelatinase) and a serine protease, are secreted factors well suited to contribute to disease severity (126, 128, 129, 215, 216). The enterococcal cytolysin is well established in several independent labs and animal models (126, 128, 129). The presence of the cytolysin has also been shown to promote the appearance of E. faecalis in the bloodstream (217). The genetics and biology of the enterococcal cytolysin have been reviewed elsewhere (218, 219). The toxin is genetically and structurally related to the lantibiotic family of bacteriocins but diverges from this family in that it possesses both bacteriocin activity and toxicity toward a variety of mammalian cell types. The cytolysin operon is typically encoded on large pheromone-responsive plasmids but has also been shown to reside within an E. faecalis pathogenicity island (134). The operon consists of six genes, designated cylLL, cylLS, cylM, cylB, cylA, and cylI, with each gene product playing an essential role in toxin synthesis, modification, secretion, activation, and immunity. Transcription of the operon is repressed by the products of a divergent operon encoding CylR1 and CylR2, and repression is alleviated by the accumulation of fully processed CylLS, which serves as a quorum sensing molecule to prime the synthesis of more toxin components as cell density increases (220).
The most direct and quantitative evidence for pathologic damage attributable to the cytolysin was obtained using a rabbit model of endophthalmitis (129). This model was selected because a robust infection can be established with as few as 10 organisms due to the natural aberrations in the intraocular immune response. This limited response provides the offending bacterium an opportunity to adapt to in vivo growth conditions and environmental cues. Moreover, highly sensitive and quantitative measurements of the evolution of disease can be made. A role for the cytolysin in tissue pathology was unambiguously demonstrated by both a reduction in β-wave response and complete destruction of retinal architecture 24 hours postinfection (129).
Because of its broad protease specificity, the enterococcal gelatinase may also play a measurable role in systemic disease (127), as well as in a model of dental caries using germ-free rats (215). In the germ-free rat model, Gold et al. (215) showed that a proteolytic (Gel+) strain exhibited cariogenic activity, whereas three nonproteolytic strains exhibited little cariogenicity. Dupont et al. (127) showed a reduced 50% lethal dose for mice injected with gelatinase-producing (Gel+) strains, and these findings were subsequently confirmed using isogenic strains defective in protease production (216). On the same transcript as the gelE gene resides the sprE gene, which encodes a serine protease. Both proteases have been shown to play important roles in C. elegans nematode killing (221), lupine endophthalmitis (222), and murine peritonitis (216). As discussed previously, gelatinase has been shown to be important in E. faecalis biofilm formation (223, 224) and also appears to play a role in the degradation of the host extracellular matrix proteins collagen and laminin (135).
Both gelatinase and the SprE serine protease are regulated at the transcriptional level by a quorum sensing signal transduction system termed fsr (225). The fsr locus encodes a response regulator, FsrA, which is thought to be activated by phosphorylation at a conserved aspartyl residue by phosphotransfer from a histidine kinase, FsrC. The kinase is thought to undergo auto-phosphorylation upon sensing the accumulation of a peptide lactone quorum molecule (226), which is encoded at the carboxy-terminus of FsrB. Most if not all of the phenotypic effect of inactivating the fsr locus resides in the lack of protease production. While initially the only genes thought to be transcriptionally controlled by activated FsrA were fsrB/C and gelE/sprE, various studies have suggested that additional genes are controlled by the fsr locus (221, 222, 227). More recently, a third locus under the control of FsrA was identified (228); this locus encodes the antimicrobial peptide enterocin O16 (229).
There is some indication that clinical isolates of E. faecalis may be enriched for the proteolytic trait, because greater than 50% of isolates from both endocarditis and other clinical sources exhibited gelatinase activity, whereas only 27% of community fecal isolates possessed this trait (230). Studies that have explored the presence of fsr genes and gelE in epidemiology have found widely differing results (231–234). In addition to differences in sample size and setting, this could be because a large percentage of gelatinase-negative clinical isolates contain a 23.9-kb chromosomal deletion that results in the deletion of both fsrA and fsrB and yields a null protease phenotype (235). Because this represents a defined deletion, it is tempting to speculate why E. faecalis would delete these important virulence factors. Analogous to the description of the E. faecalis pathogenicity island, which is known to be modulated through the insertion and deletion of genetic information (92), the organism may simply choose to modulate its virulence for fear of overtly offending its host.
While E. faecium appears to lack both proteolytic and cytolytic activities, it has been shown to encode a hyaluronidase (236), which appears to be enriched in nonstool isolates. Hyaluronidase activity has yet to be demonstrated in these isolates, but it is conceivable that this trait is emerging within the E. faecium population. An E. faecium pathogenicity island has also been described, which contains an ortholog of the E. faecalis esp gene (237, 238). Apart from the esp gene and an araC-like transcriptional regulator, none of the remaining open reading frames resemble those present in the E. faecalis pathogenicity island, and the nature of this element remains largely unknown.
TOXIC METABOLITES
In addition to secreted proteins, E. faecalis and E. faecium have also been shown to produce toxic oxygen metabolites that can cause cell or organ damage (94, 239). Using a worm model, Moy et al. (239) demonstrated that E. faecium produces hydrogen peroxide at levels that cause cellular damage. E. faecium transposon insertion mutants were identified which altered C. elegans killing activity and displayed altered levels of hydrogen peroxide production. Mutation of an NADH oxidase-encoding gene eliminated nearly all NADH oxidase activity and reduced hydrogen peroxide production and killing, whereas mutation of a gene encoding an NADH peroxidase resulted in enhanced levels of hydrogen peroxide and more rapid nematode killing. Depending on the culture conditions, E. faecium can produce hydrogen peroxide at varying levels, and this production appears to correlate inversely with nematode survival.
According to one study, the vast majority (87/91) of E. faecalis strains tested produce superoxide (O2–), whereas E. faecium isolates (5/13) did so less frequently (240). The study authors speculated that membrane-damaging effects of oxygen radicals might potentiate cellular damage to nearby intestinal epithelial cells. In proof, it was shown that the production of extracellular superoxide and hydrogen peroxide damages colonic epithelial cell DNA (94). The answer to why E. faecalis produces extracellular oxygen radicals stems from the fact that this oxygen radical is a byproduct of an incomplete respiratory chain. E. faecalis is capable of reconstituting a cytochrome complex in the presence of exogenous heme (241), enabling it to effectively respire. The fact that enterococci generate a byproduct that damages its host appears to be an unintended consequence of incomplete respiration.
COMPARATIVE GENOMICS OF E. FAECALIS AND E. FAECIUM: EMERGENCE OF PATHOGENIC, RESISTANT LINEAGES
With the development and widespread use of next-generation sequencing and comparative analysis of bacterial genomes, a great deal has been learned about the genetic makeup of pathogenic E. faecalis and E. faecium strains. The first enterococcal genome to be completely sequenced was a vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis strain isolated from an HIV-infected patient (35, 242). The genome of this isolate, termed V583, made apparent the importance of mobile genetic elements in the development of E. faecalis into a hospital-adapted pathogen (35, 242). When compared to a commensal-like E. faecalis strain, OG1RF (243), which harbors no known functional mobile elements, V583 was found to possess a genome more than 25% larger as the result of harboring three plasmids, a pathogenicity island (92, 243), and several integrated prophages (242).
First identified in the multiple drug-resistant strain MMH594 (92), the pathogenicity island has been shown to be widely distributed among hospital-adapted, pathogenic strains of E. faecalis. It encodes the virulence factors cytolysin and AS, ESP, and a variety of other elements believed to play a role in pathogenesis (92, 244). Overall, the trend of increased mobile genetic element content among multidrug-resistant, hospital-adapted strains holds true within E. faecalis and is strongly correlated with the absence of a functional clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-Cas system (245).
The population structures of E. faecalis and E. faecium have been widely studied, initially by multilocus sequence type and related techniques (246–249) and more recently by comparing sequences of entire genomes of many isolates of both species (104, 250, 251) (Fig. 3). These studies revealed a pronounced clade structure within the E. faecium species. The two main branches, clades A and B, are so divergent from one another that they approach the limits for designation as separate species (Fig. 3A) (104, 248). Most hospital-adapted E. faecium isolates belong to clade A and closely resemble strains isolated from agricultural and companion animals. Non-hospital associated human fecal isolates of E. faecium, on the other hand, mainly belong to clade B and appear to have diverged from clade A strains several thousand years ago (104, 248, 252–254).
FIGURE 3.

Population structure of E. faecium and E. faecalis based on comparisons of whole genomes. (A) RAxML tree of 1,344 single copy core genes found in 73 E. faecium genomes, showing the clade structure of the E. faecium population. Reproduced with permission from reference 104. (B) Phylogeny of 515 E. faecalis isolates based on 1,293 conserved core genes found in 99% of isolates. The L1, L2, and L3 lineages are highlighted with red, purple, and turquoise lines, respectively. Reproduced with permission from reference 250.
In contrast to the pronounced clade structure of E. faecium, the population structure of E. faecalis is less discrete (Fig. 3B) (250, 251). A study of E. faecalis mainly derived from Great Britain revealed three dominant lineages, named L1, L2, and L3 (Fig. 3B) (250). However, these lineages are fairly closely related compared to the A and B clades of E. faecium. This finding supports previous work comparing a smaller set of E. faecalis genomes (253).
ANIMAL MODELS USED TO STUDY PATHOGENIC MECHANISMS
Several animal models have been developed to study different aspects of enterococcal pathogenesis. Using both invertebrate and vertebrate host organisms, many important discoveries have been made in identifying the roles of specific virulence factors in enterococcal disease (Table 1). Model organisms have also been employed in the discovery of novel antibacterial compounds. Here, we summarize the major advances in the establishment of relevant models of enterococcal disease; a more complete examination of models of enterococcal infection has been presented recently in two excellent reviews (255, 256).
Invertebrates
Invertebrate models of enterococcal infection have been very useful due to the ability to use large numbers of organisms in each experiment and because they are known to be natural hosts of enterococci in the environment. C. elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Galleria mellonella have all been used in different infection contexts, largely to examine the effects of virulence factors on lethality of the whole organism (130, 257, 258). It has been observed that there is good correlation between virulence factors in invertebrate hosts and in mammalian infection models (130, 221). Invertebrates, particularly C. elegans, have also proven to be very fruitful for high-throughput screening for novel antienterococcal compounds, because they allow for identification of bactericidal compounds with low host toxicity, as well as host immunomodulatory molecules that impact the course of infection (259).
Vertebrates
Several infection models have been established in small mammals for many of the most important enterococcal diseases. Two of the earliest infection models were developed for enterococcal IE, first in rabbits by MacCallum and Hastings in the first description of enterococcal disease (3) and later modified by Garrison and Freedman (260). Santoro and Levison developed a rat model of infection in the 1970s (261). Both the rabbit and rat IE models involve the insertion of a catheter into the heart valve followed by administration of bacteria. The introduction of a foreign body allows for initial adherence of enterococcal cells, resulting in a robust infection of the cardiac tissue. The determination of many important virulence factors for endocarditis have been shown using these animal models (128, 157, 255).
Intestinal colonization by E. faecalis and E. faecium has been studied in antibiotic-treated mice to model antibiotic treatment in hospitalized human patients. Generally, mice are treated with high concentrations of broad-spectrum antibiotics, particularly spectinomycin or metronidazole, to allow enterococcal invasion into the microbiota. Kommineni and colleagues obtained stable, long-term colonization of an introduced E. faecalis strain into an intact mouse microbiota through long-term administration of the bacteria in drinking water (102). Recently, studies examining the localization of E. faecalis within the intestinal tract have been performed in germ-free mice, allowing for direct visualization of bacteria in contact with intestinal tissue (262). How closely this localization resembles that of enterococci in a fully colonized animal has yet to be determined.
Mice have also been used with great success to study bacteremia and peritonitis caused by E. faecalis and E. faecium (126, 263). Urinary tract infection models, both catheter-associated and endogenous, have been established in female mice and were instrumental in identifying virulence factors, particularly adhesins, in enterococcal pathogenesis (134, 147, 264, 265). Finally, to study postoperative infections, Stevens and colleagues established a highly tractable rabbit endophthalmitis model in 1992 (266). This model involves the direct placement of small numbers of bacteria into the vitreous, directly behind the lens, where the evolution of infection can be easily observed by direct ophthalmoscopy as well as slit lamp biomicroscopy. This allows the influence of a number of virulence traits on the host-microbe dynamic to be assessed in real time (129).
From one of the first descriptions of enterococcal infection in 1899 (3) to the understanding of the role of virulence factors in disease and identification of novel antimicrobials, animal models have proven to be extremely important in the study of enterococcal pathogenesis, and their further development will continue to provide insight into diseases caused by enterococci.
CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
Enterococci are unusually well adapted for survival and persistence in a variety of adverse environments, including inanimate surfaces in the hospital environment and at sites of infection. This intrinsic ruggedness undoubtedly plays a role in providing opportunities for enterococci to interact with other overtly drug-resistant microbes and acquire additional resistances on mobile elements. The rapid rise of antimicrobial resistance among hospital-adapted enterococci has rendered hospital-acquired infections a leading therapeutic challenge. Having added about a quarter of a genome of additional DNA conveyed by mobile elements, there are undoubtedly many more properties that have been acquired that help enterococci persist and spread in the hospital setting and cause diseases that have yet to be defined. Much remains to be learned about these ancient and rugged microbes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants AI083214 and EY028222 from the National Institutes of Health.
The contributions of many who have been associated with the Gilmore Lab over the past 30 years are gratefully acknowledged.
Contributor Information
Elizabeth Fiore, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Daria Van Tyne, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Michael S. Gilmore, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114 Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Vincent A. Fischetti, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY
Richard P. Novick, Skirball Institute for Molecular Medicine, NYU Medical Center, New York, NY
Joseph J. Ferretti, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK
Daniel A. Portnoy, Department of Molecular and Cellular Microbiology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Miriam Braunstein, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Julian I. Rood, Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
REFERENCES
- 1.Thiercelin ME. 1899. Sur un diplocoque saprophyte de l’intestin susceptible de devenir pathogen. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 5:269–271. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thiercelin ME. 1899. Morphologie et modes de reproduction de l’enterocoque. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 11:551–553. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maccallum WG, Hastings TW. 1899. A case of acute endocarditis caused by Micrococcus zymogenes (nov. spec.), with a description of the microorganism. J Exp Med 4:521–534 10.1084/jem.4.5-6.521. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, Dudeck MA, Patel J, Kallen AJ, Edwards JR, Sievert DM. 2016. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 37:1288–1301 10.1017/ice.2016.174. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aly NY, Al-Mousa HH, Al Asar SM, Sayed E, Al Asar M. 2008. Nosocomial infections in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. Med Princ Pract 17:373–377 10.1159/000141500. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kristich CJ, Rice LB, Arias CA. 2014. Enterococcal infection: treatment and antibiotic resistance. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190424/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin SK, National Healthcare Safety Network Team, Participating National Healthcare Safety Network Facilities. 2008. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:996–1011 10.1086/591861. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Megran DW. 1992. Enterococcal endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 15:63–71 10.1093/clinids/15.1.63. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hancock LE, Gilmore MS. 2006. Pathogenicity of enterococci, p 251–258. In Fischetti VA, Novick RP, Ferretti JJ, Portnoy DA, Rood JI (ed), Gram-Positive Pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N. 2014. Enterococci: from Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190424/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Van Tyne D, Gilmore MS. 2014. Friend turned foe: evolution of enterococcal virulence and antibiotic resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol 68:337–356 10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-113003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eggesbø M, Moen B, Peddada S, Baird D, Rugtveit J, Midtvedt T, Bushel PR, Sekelja M, Rudi K. 2011. Development of gut microbiota in infants not exposed to medical interventions. APMIS 119:17–35 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02688.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lawley TD, Walker AW. 2013. Intestinal colonization resistance. Immunology 138:1–11 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2012.03616.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chadfield MS, Christensen JP, Juhl-Hansen J, Christensen H, Bisgaard M. 2005. Characterization of Enterococcus hirae outbreaks in broiler flocks demonstrating increased mortality because of septicemia and endocarditis and/or altered production parameters. Avian Dis 49:16–23 10.1637/7205-050604. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jung A, Rautenschlein S. 2014. Comprehensive report of an Enterococcus cecorum infection in a broiler flock in Northern Germany. BMC Vet Res 10:311 10.1186/s12917-014-0311-7. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martin JD, Mundt JO. 1972. Enterococci in insects. Appl Microbiol 24:575–580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lebreton F, Willems RJL, Gilmore MS. 2014. Enterococcus diversity, origins in nature, and gut colonization. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mundt JO. 1963. Occurrence of enterococci on plants in a wild environment. Appl Microbiol 11:141–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lancefield RC. 1933. A serological differentiation of human and other groups of hemolytic streptococci. J Exp Med 57:571–595 10.1084/jem.57.4.571. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schleifer KH, Kilpper-Balz R. 1984. Transfer of Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium to the genus Enterococcus nom. rev. as Enterococcus faecalis comb. nov. and Enterococcus faecium comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 34:31–34 10.1099/00207713-34-1-31. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lebreton F, Manson AL, Saavedra JT, Straub TJ, Earl AM, Gilmore MS. 2017. Tracing the enterococci from Paleozoic origins to the hospital. Cell 169:849–861.e13 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.027. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hollenbeck BL, Rice LB. 2012. Intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms in enterococcus. Virulence 3:421–433 10.4161/viru.21282. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Taur Y, Xavier JB, Lipuma L, Ubeda C, Goldberg J, Gobourne A, Lee YJ, Dubin KA, Socci ND, Viale A, Perales MA, Jenq RR, van den Brink MRM, Pamer EG. 2012. Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 55:905–914 10.1093/cid/cis580. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moellering RC Jr, Wennersten C, Weinberg AN. 1971. Synergy of penicillin and gentamicin against enterococci. J Infect Dis 124(Suppl):S207–S209 10.1093/infdis/124.Supplement_1.S207. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Basker MJ, Slocombe B, Sutherland R. 1977. Aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci. J Clin Pathol 30:375–380 10.1136/jcp.30.4.375. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ferretti JJ, Gilmore KS, Courvalin P. 1986. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the gene specifying the bifunctional 6′-aminoglycoside acetyltransferase 2ʺ-aminoglycoside phosphotransferase enzyme in Streptococcus faecalis and identification and cloning of gene regions specifying the two activities. J Bacteriol 167:631–638 10.1128/jb.167.2.631-638.1986. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hegstad K, Mikalsen T, Coque TM, Werner G, Sundsfjord A. 2010. Mobile genetic elements and their contribution to the emergence of antimicrobial resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:541–554 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03226.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Murray BE. 1992. Beta-lactamase-producing enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:2355–2359 10.1128/AAC.36.11.2355. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Geraci JE, Heilman FR, Nichols DR, Ross GT, Wellman WE. 1956. Some laboratory and clinical experiences with a new antibiotic, vancomycin. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 31:564–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Levine DP. 2006. Vancomycin: a history. Clin Infect Dis 42(Suppl 1):S5–S12 10.1086/491709. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bisno AL, Dismukes WE, Durack DT, Kaplan EL, Karchmer AW, Kaye D, Rahimtoola SH, Sande MA, Sanford JP, Watanakunakorn C, Wilson WR. 1989. Antimicrobial treatment of infective endocarditis due to viridans streptococci, enterococci, and staphylococci. JAMA 261:1471–1477 10.1001/jama.1989.03420100107033. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kirst HA, Thompson DG, Nicas TI. 1998. Historical yearly usage of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:1303–1304 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1303. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Uttley AH, Collins CH, Naidoo J, George RC. 1988. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet 1:57–58 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)91037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Leclercq R, Derlot E, Duval J, Courvalin P. 1988. Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium. N Engl J Med 319:157–161 10.1056/NEJM198807213190307. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sahm DF, Kissinger J, Gilmore MS, Murray PR, Mulder R, Solliday J, Clarke B. 1989. In vitro susceptibility studies of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:1588–1591 10.1128/AAC.33.9.1588. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arias CA, Murray BE. 2008. Emergence and management of drug-resistant enterococcal infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 6:637–655. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bingen E, Lambert-Zechovsky N, Leclercq R, Doit C, Mariani-Kurkdjian P. 1990. Bactericidal activity of vancomycin, daptomycin, ampicillin and aminoglycosides against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J Antimicrob Chemother 26:619–626 10.1093/jac/26.5.619. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lesho E, Wortmann GW, Craft D, Moran KA. 2006. De novo daptomycin nonsusceptibility in a clinical isolate. J Clin Microbiol 44:673. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Long JK, Choueiri TK, Hall GS, Avery RK, Sekeres MA. 2005. Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Mayo Clin Proc 80:1215–1216 10.4065/80.9.1215. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lewis JS II, Owens A, Cadena J, Sabol K, Patterson JE, Jorgensen JH. 2005. Emergence of daptomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium during daptomycin therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1664–1665 10.1128/AAC.49.4.1664-1665.2005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Palmer KL, Daniel A, Hardy C, Silverman J, Gilmore MS. 2011. Genetic basis for daptomycin resistance in enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3345–3356 10.1128/AAC.00207-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arias CA, Panesso D, McGrath DM, Qin X, Mojica MF, Miller C, Diaz L, Tran TT, Rincon S, Barbu EM, Reyes J, Roh JH, Lobos E, Sodergren E, Pasqualini R, Arap W, Quinn JP, Shamoo Y, Murray BE, Weinstock GM. 2011. Genetic basis for in vivo daptomycin resistance in enterococci. N Engl J Med 365:892–900 10.1056/NEJMoa1011138. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Montero CI, Stock F, Murray PR. 2008. Mechanisms of resistance to daptomycin in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:1167–1170 10.1128/AAC.00774-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Saito HE, Harp JR, Fozo EM. 2014. Incorporation of exogenous fatty acids protects Enterococcus faecalis from membrane-damaging agents. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:6527–6538 10.1128/AEM.02044-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hines KM, Waalkes A, Penewit K, Holmes EA, Salipante SJ, Werth BJ, Xu L. 2017. Characterization of the mechanisms of daptomycin resistance among gram-positive bacterial pathogens by multidimensional lipidomics. mSphere 2:e00492-17. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gonzales RD, Schreckenberger PC, Graham MB, Kelkar S, DenBesten K, Quinn JP. 2001. Infections due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium resistant to linezolid. Lancet 357:1179 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04376-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Auckland C, Teare L, Cooke F, Kaufmann ME, Warner M, Jones G, Bamford K, Ayles H, Johnson AP. 2002. Linezolid-resistant enterococci: report of the first isolates in the United Kingdom. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:743–746 10.1093/jac/dkf246. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Marshall SH, Donskey CJ, Hutton-Thomas R, Salata RA, Rice LB. 2002. Gene dosage and linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:3334–3336 10.1128/AAC.46.10.3334-3336.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bourgeois-Nicolaos N, Massias L, Couson B, Butel MJ, Andremont A, Doucet-Populaire F. 2007. Dose dependence of emergence of resistance to linezolid in Enterococcus faecalis in vivo. J Infect Dis 195:1480–1488 10.1086/513876. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Diaz L, Kiratisin P, Mendes RE, Panesso D, Singh KV, Arias CA. 2012. Transferable plasmid-mediated resistance to linezolid due to cfr in a human clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3917–3922 10.1128/AAC.00419-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fiedler S, Bender JK, Klare I, Halbedel S, Grohmann E, Szewzyk U, Werner G. 2016. Tigecycline resistance in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium is mediated by an upregulation of plasmid-encoded tetracycline determinants tet(L) and tet(M). J Antimicrob Chemother 71:871–881 10.1093/jac/dkv420. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cattoir V, Isnard C, Cosquer T, Odhiambo A, Bucquet F, Guérin F, Giard J-C. 2015. Genomic analysis of reduced susceptibility to tigecycline in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:239–244 10.1128/AAC.04174-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chenoweth C, Schaberg D. 1990. The epidemiology of enterococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 9:80–89 10.1007/BF01963631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Huycke MM, Spiegel CA, Gilmore MS. 1991. Bacteremia caused by hemolytic, high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:1626–1634 10.1128/AAC.35.8.1626. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hayden MK. 2000. Insights into the epidemiology and control of infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 31:1058–1065 10.1086/318126. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Porwancher R, Sheth A, Remphrey S, Taylor E, Hinkle C, Zervos M. 1997. Epidemiological study of hospital-acquired infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: possible transmission by an electronic ear-probe thermometer. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 18:771–773 10.2307/30141323. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hartke A, Giard JC, Laplace JM, Auffray Y. 1998. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in an oligotrophic microcosm: changes in morphology, development of general stress resistance, and analysis of protein synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4238–4245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Maraccini PA, Ferguson DM, Boehm AB. 2012. Diurnal variation in Enterococcus species composition in polluted ocean water and a potential role for the enterococcal carotenoid in protection against photoinactivation. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:305–310 10.1128/AEM.06821-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Figdor D, Davies JK, Sundqvist G. 2003. Starvation survival, growth and recovery of Enterococcus faecalis in human serum. Oral Microbiol Immunol 18:234–239 10.1034/j.1399-302X.2003.00072.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Heim S, Lleo M, Bonato B, Guzman CA, Canepari P. 2002. The viable but nonculturable state and starvation are different stress responses of Enterococcus faecalis, as determined by proteome analysis. J Bacteriol 184:6739–6745 10.1128/JB.184.23.6739-6745.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lleó MM, Tafi MC, Canepari P. 1998. Nonculturable Enterococcus faecalis cells are metabolically active and capable of resuming active growth. Syst Appl Microbiol 21:333–339 10.1016/S0723-2020(98)80041-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Flahaut S, Frere J, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. 1996. Comparison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress responses in Enterococcus faecalis. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2416–2420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Flahaut S, Hartke A, Giard JC, Auffray Y. 1997. Alkaline stress response in Enterococcus faecalis: adaptation, cross-protection, and changes in protein synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:812–814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Flahaut S, Hartke A, Giard J-C, Benachour A, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. 1996. Relationship between stress response toward bile salts, acid and heat treatment in Enterococcus faecalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 138:49–54 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08133.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Flahaut S, Laplace JM, Frère J, Auffray Y. 1998. The oxidative stress response in Enterococcus faecalis: relationship between H2O2 tolerance and H2O2 stress proteins. Lett Appl Microbiol 26:259–264 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00325.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Giard JC, Hartke A, Flahaut S, Benachour A, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. 1996. Starvation-induced multiresistance in Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2. Curr Microbiol 32:264–271 10.1007/s002849900048. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Giard JC, Hartke A, Flahaut S, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. 1997. Glucose starvation response in Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2: survival and protein analysis. Res Microbiol 148:27–35 10.1016/S0923-2508(97)81897-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Giard J-C, Laplace JM, Rincé A, Pichereau V, Benachour A, Leboeuf C, Flahaut S, Auffray Y, Hartke A. 2001. The stress proteome of Enterococcus faecalis. Electrophoresis 22:2947–2954 10.1002/1522-2683(200108)22:14<2947::AID-ELPS2947>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Laplace JM, Thuault M, Hartke A, Boutibonnes P, Auffray Y. 1997. Sodium hypochlorite stress in Enterococcus faecalis: influence of antecedent growth conditions and induced proteins. Curr Microbiol 34:284–289 10.1007/s002849900183. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rince A, Flahaut S, Auffray Y. 2000. Identification of general stress genes in Enterococcus faecalis. Int J Food Microbiol 55:87–91 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00180-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hancock LE, Perego M. 2004. Systematic inactivation and phenotypic characterization of two-component signal transduction systems of Enterococcus faecalis V583. J Bacteriol 186:7951–7958 10.1128/JB.186.23.7951-7958.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Le Breton Y, Boël G, Benachour A, Prévost H, Auffray Y, Rincé A. 2003. Molecular characterization of Enterococcus faecalis two-component signal transduction pathways related to environmental stresses. Environ Microbiol 5:329–337 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00405.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Guzmán Prieto AM, Wijngaarden J, Braat JC, Rogers MRC, Majoor E, Brouwer EC, Zhang X, Bayjanov JR, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL, van Schaik W. 2017. The two-component system ChtRS contributes to chlorhexidine tolerance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02122-16 10.1128/AAC.02122-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Weinstock DM, Conlon M, Iovino C, Aubrey T, Gudiol C, Riedel E, Young JW, Kiehn TE, Zuccotti G. 2007. Colonization, bloodstream infection, and mortality caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 13:615–621 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.01.078. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Garsin DA, Frank KL, Silanpää J, Ausubel FM, Hartke A, Shankar N, Murray BE. 2014. Pathogenesis and models of enterococcal infection. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190424/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Johnson AP. 1994. The pathogenicity of enterococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 33:1083–1089 10.1093/jac/33.6.1083. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Schloissnig S, Arumugam M, Sunagawa S, Mitreva M, Tap J, Zhu A, Waller A, Mende DR, Kultima JR, Martin J, Kota K, Sunyaev SR, Weinstock GM, Bork P. 2013. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493:45–50 10.1038/nature11711. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Noble CJ. 1978. Carriage of group D streptococci in the human bowel. J Clin Pathol 31:1182–1186 10.1136/jcp.31.12.1182. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mullineaux-Sanders C, Suez J, Elinav E, Frankel G. 2018. Sieving through gut models of colonization resistance. Nat Microbiol 3:132–140 10.1038/s41564-017-0095-1. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ubeda C, Taur Y, Jenq RR, Equinda MJ, Son T, Samstein M, Viale A, Socci ND, van den Brink MRMM, Kamboj M, Pamer EG. 2010. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J Clin Invest 120:4332–4341 10.1172/JCI43918. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Darlong V, Jayalakhsmi TS, Kaul HL, Tandon R. 2003. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients on ventilator. Trop Gastroenterol 24:124–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Başaran ÜN, Celayir S, Eray N, Oztürk R, Senyüz OF. 1998. The effect of an H2-receptor antagonist on small-bowel colonization and bacterial translocation in newborn rats. Pediatr Surg Int 13:118–120 10.1007/s003830050263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Suzuki T, Shibata C, Yamaguchi A, Igarashi K, Kobayashi H. 1993. Complementation of an Enterococcus hirae (Streptococcus faecalis) mutant in the alpha subunit of the H(+)-ATPase by cloned genes from the same and different species. Mol Microbiol 9:111–118 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01673.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Teng F, Wang L, Singh KV, Murray BE, Weinstock GM. 2002. Involvement of PhoP-PhoS homologs in Enterococcus faecalis virulence. Infect Immun 70:1991–1996 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1991-1996.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Donskey CJ. 2004. The role of the intestinal tract as a reservoir and source for transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 39:219–226 10.1086/422002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Donskey CJ, Hanrahan JA, Hutton RA, Rice LB. 2000. Effect of parenteral antibiotic administration on the establishment of colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. J Infect Dis 181:1830–1833 10.1086/315428. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Donskey CJ, Helfand MS, Pultz NJ, Rice LB. 2004. Effect of parenteral fluoroquinolone administration on persistence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:326–328 10.1128/AAC.48.1.326-328.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Donskey CJ, Hanrahan JA, Hutton RA, Rice LB. 1999. Effect of parenteral antibiotic administration on the establishment of colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. J Infect Dis 180:384–390 10.1086/314874. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dancer SJ. 2001. The problem with cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother 48:463–478 10.1093/jac/48.4.463. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Brandl K, Plitas G, Mihu CN, Ubeda C, Jia T, Fleisher M, Schnabl B, DeMatteo RP, Pamer EG. 2008. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci exploit antibiotic-induced innate immune deficits. Nature 455:804–807 10.1038/nature07250. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pham TAN, Clare S, Goulding D, Arasteh JM, Stares MD, Browne HP, Keane JA, Page AJ, Kumasaka N, Kane L, Mottram L, Harcourt K, Hale C, Arends MJ, Gaffney DJ, Dougan G, Lawley TD, Sanger Mouse Genetics Project. 2014. Epithelial IL-22RA1-mediated fucosylation promotes intestinal colonization resistance to an opportunistic pathogen. Cell Host Microbe 16:504–516 10.1016/j.chom.2014.08.017. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Shankar N, Baghdayan AS, Gilmore MS. 2002. Modulation of virulence within a pathogenicity island in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Nature 417:746–750 10.1038/nature00802. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Huycke MM, Moore D, Joyce W, Wise P, Shepard L, Kotake Y, Gilmore MS. 2001. Extracellular superoxide production by Enterococcus faecalis requires demethylmenaquinone and is attenuated by functional terminal quinol oxidases. Mol Microbiol 42:729–740 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Huycke MM, Abrams V, Moore DR. 2002. Enterococcus faecalis produces extracellular superoxide and hydrogen peroxide that damages colonic epithelial cell DNA. Carcinogenesis 23:529–536 10.1093/carcin/23.3.529. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Wang X, Allen TD, May RJ, Lightfoot S, Houchen CW, Huycke MM. 2008. Enterococcus faecalis induces aneuploidy and tetraploidy in colonic epithelial cells through a bystander effect. Cancer Res 68:9909–9917 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1551. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mondot S, Kang S, Furet JP, Aguirre de Carcer D, McSweeney C, Morrison M, Marteau P, Doré J, Leclerc M. 2011. Highlighting new phylogenetic specificities of Crohn’s disease microbiota. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17:185–192 10.1002/ibd.21436. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Shiga H, Kajiura T, Shinozaki J, Takagi S, Kinouchi Y, Takahashi S, Negoro K, Endo K, Kakuta Y, Suzuki M, Shimosegawa T. 2012. Changes of faecal microbiota in patients with Crohn’s disease treated with an elemental diet and total parenteral nutrition. Dig Liver Dis 44:736–742 10.1016/j.dld.2012.04.014. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Furrie E, Macfarlane S, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. 2004. Systemic antibodies towards mucosal bacteria in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease differentially activate the innate immune response. Gut 53:91–98 10.1136/gut.53.1.91. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ocvirk S, Sava IG, Lengfelder I, Lagkouvardos I, Steck N, Roh JH, Tchaptchet S, Bao Y, Hansen JJ, Huebner J, Carroll IM, Murray BE, Sartor RB, Haller D. 2015. Surface-associated lipoproteins link Enterococcus faecalis virulence to colitogenic activity in IL-10-deficient mice independent of their expression levels. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004911 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004911. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Brock TD, Davie JM. 1963. Probable identity of a group D hemolysin with a bacteriocine. J Bacteriol 86:708–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Brock TD, Peacher B, Pierson D. 1963. Survey of the bacteriocines of enterococci. J Bacteriol 86:702–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kommineni S, Bretl DJ, Lam V, Chakraborty R, Hayward M, Simpson P, Cao Y, Bousounis P, Kristich CJ, Salzman NH. 2015. Bacteriocin production augments niche competition by enterococci in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract. Nature 526:719–722 10.1038/nature15524. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Gilmore MS, Rauch M, Ramsey MM, Himes PR, Varahan S, Manson JM, Lebreton F, Hancock LE. 2015. Pheromone killing of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583 by native commensal strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:7273–7278 10.1073/pnas.1500553112. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Lebreton F, van Schaik W, McGuire AM, Godfrey P, Griggs A, Mazumdar V, Corander J, Cheng L, Saif S, Young S, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Birren B, Willems RJ, Earl AM, Gilmore MS. 2013. Emergence of epidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium from animal and commensal strains. MBio 4:e00534-13 10.1128/mBio.00534-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zhang X, Top J, de Been M, Bierschenk D, Rogers M, Leendertse M, Bonten MJM, van der Poll T, Willems RJL, van Schaik W. 2013. Identification of a genetic determinant in clinical Enterococcus faecium strains that contributes to intestinal colonization during antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis 207:1780–1786 10.1093/infdis/jit076. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Montealegre MC, Singh KV, Murray BE. 2016. Gastrointestinal tract colonization dynamics by different Enterococcus faecium clades. J Infect Dis 213:1914–1922 10.1093/infdis/jiv597. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Ubeda C, Bucci V, Caballero S, Djukovic A, Toussaint NC, Equinda M, Lipuma L, Ling L, Gobourne A, No D, Taur Y, Jenq RR, van den Brink MRM, Xavier JB, Pamer EG. 2013. Intestinal microbiota containing Barnesiella species cures vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium colonization. Infect Immun 81:965–973 10.1128/IAI.01197-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Caballero S, Kim S, Carter RA, Leiner IM, Sušac B, Miller L, Kim GJ, Ling L, Pamer EG. 2017. Cooperating commensals restore colonization resistance to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Cell Host Microbe 21:592–602.e4 10.1016/j.chom.2017.04.002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wells CL, Maddaus MA, Simmons RL. 1988. Proposed mechanisms for the translocation of intestinal bacteria. Rev Infect Dis 10:958–979 10.1093/clinids/10.5.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Gentry-Weeks CR, Karkhoff-Schweizer R, Pikis A, Estay M, Keith JM. 1999. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Infect Immun 67:2160–2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wells CL, Erlandsen SL. 1991. Localization of translocating Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterococcus faecalis within cecal and colonic tissues of monoassociated mice. Infect Immun 59:4693–4697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wells CL, Jechorek RP, Erlandsen SL. 1990. Evidence for the translocation of Enterococcus faecalis across the mouse intestinal tract. J Infect Dis 162:82–90 10.1093/infdis/162.1.82. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Payne JM, Sansom BF, Garner RJ, Thomson AR, Miles BJ. 1960. Uptake of small resin particles (1-5 microns diameter) by the alimentary canal of the calf. Nature 188:586–587 10.1038/188586a0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Olmsted SB, Dunny GM, Erlandsen SL, Wells CL. 1994. A plasmid-encoded surface protein on Enterococcus faecalis augments its internalization by cultured intestinal epithelial cells. J Infect Dis 170:1549–1556 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1549. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Waters CM, Hirt H, McCormick JK, Schlievert PM, Wells CL, Dunny GM. 2004. An amino-terminal domain of Enterococcus faecalis aggregation substance is required for aggregation, bacterial internalization by epithelial cells and binding to lipoteichoic acid. Mol Microbiol 52:1159–1171 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04045.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Waters CM, Wells CL, Dunny GM. 2003. The aggregation domain of aggregation substance, not the RGD motifs, is critical for efficient internalization by HT-29 enterocytes. Infect Immun 71:5682–5689 10.1128/IAI.71.10.5682-5689.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Billington EO, Phang SH, Gregson DB, Pitout JDD, Ross T, Church DL, Laupland KB, Parkins MD. 2014. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for Enterococcus spp. blood stream infections: a population-based study. Int J Infect Dis 26:76–82 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.02.012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Buetti N, Atkinson A, Marschall J, Kronenberg A, Swiss Centre for Antibiotic Resistance (ANRESIS). 2017. Incidence of bloodstream infections: a nationwide surveillance of acute care hospitals in Switzerland 2008-2014. BMJ Open 7:e013665 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013665. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Noskin GA, Peterson LR, Warren JR. 1995. Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia: acquisition and outcome. Clin Infect Dis 20:296–301 10.1093/clinids/20.2.296. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Pinholt M, Østergaard C, Arpi M, Bruun NE, Schønheyder HC, Gradel KO, Søgaard M, Knudsen JD, Danish Collaborative Bacteraemia Network (DACOBAN). 2014. Incidence, clinical characteristics and 30-day mortality of enterococcal bacteraemia in Denmark 2006-2009: a population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:145–151 10.1111/1469-0691.12236. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jett BD, Huycke MM, Gilmore MS. 1994. Virulence of enterococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 7:462–478 10.1128/CMR.7.4.462. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Arias CA, Murray BE. 2012. The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:266–278 10.1038/nrmicro2761. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Stroud L, Edwards J, Danzing L, Culver D, Gaynes R. 1996. Risk factors for mortality associated with enterococcal bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17:576–580 10.2307/30141943. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Caballero-Granado FJ, Cisneros JM, Luque R, Torres-Tortosa M, Gamboa F, Díez F, Villanueva JL, Pérez-Cano R, Pasquau J, Merino D, Menchero A, Mora D, López-Ruz MA, Vergara A. 1998. Comparative study of bacteremias caused by Enterococcus spp. with and without high-level resistance to gentamicin. The Grupo Andaluz para el estudio de las Enfermedades Infecciosas. J Clin Microbiol 36:520–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Miyazaki S, Ohno A, Kobayashi I, Uji T, Yamaguchi K, Goto S. 1993. Cytotoxic effect of hemolytic culture supernatant from Enterococcus faecalis on mouse polymorphonuclear neutrophils and macrophages. Microbiol Immunol 37:265–270 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1993.tb03209.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ike Y, Hashimoto H, Clewell DB. 1984. Hemolysin of Streptococcus faecalis subspecies zymogenes contributes to virulence in mice. Infect Immun 45:528–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Dupont H, Montravers P, Mohler J, Carbon C. 1998. Disparate findings on the role of virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis in mouse and rat models of peritonitis. Infect Immun 66:2570–2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Chow JW, Thal LA, Perri MB, Vazquez JA, Donabedian SM, Clewell DB, Zervos MJ. 1993. Plasmid-associated hemolysin and aggregation substance production contribute to virulence in experimental enterococcal endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:2474–2477 10.1128/AAC.37.11.2474. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Jett BD, Jensen HG, Nordquist RE, Gilmore MS. 1992. Contribution of the pAD1-encoded cytolysin to the severity of experimental Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. Infect Immun 60:2445–2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Garsin DA, Sifri CD, Mylonakis E, Qin X, Singh KV, Murray BE, Calderwood SB, Ausubel FM. 2001. A simple model host for identifying Gram-positive virulence factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10892–10897 10.1073/pnas.191378698. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Guzmàn CA, Pruzzo C, LiPira G, Calegari L. 1989. Role of adherence in pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis urinary tract infection and endocarditis. Infect Immun 57:1834–1838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Kreft B, Marre R, Schramm U, Wirth R. 1992. Aggregation substance of Enterococcus faecalis mediates adhesion to cultured renal tubular cells. Infect Immun 60:25–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Galli D, Lottspeich F, Wirth R. 1990. Sequence analysis of Enterococcus faecalis aggregation substance encoded by the sex pheromone plasmid pAD1. Mol Microbiol 4:895–904 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00662.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Shankar N, Lockatell CV, Baghdayan AS, Drachenberg C, Gilmore MS, Johnson DE. 2001. Role of Enterococcus faecalis surface protein Esp in the pathogenesis of ascending urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 69:4366–4372 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4366-4372.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Tomita H, Ike Y. 2004. Tissue-specific adherent Enterococcus faecalis strains that show highly efficient adhesion to human bladder carcinoma T24 cells also adhere to extracellular matrix proteins. Infect Immun 72:5877–5885 10.1128/IAI.72.10.5877-5885.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Nallapareddy SR, Qin X, Weinstock GM, Höök M, Murray BE, Murray BE. 2000. Enterococcus faecalis adhesin, ace, mediates attachment to extracellular matrix proteins collagen type IV and laminin as well as collagen type I. Infect Immun 68:5218–5224 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5218-5224.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Duh RW, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2000. Diversity of ace, a gene encoding a microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, from different strains of Enterococcus faecalis and evidence for production of ace during human infections. Infect Immun 68:5210–5217 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5210-5217.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Nallapareddy SR, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2003. Clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium exhibit strain-specific collagen binding mediated by Acm, a new member of the MSCRAMM family. Mol Microbiol 47:1733–1747 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03417.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Rich RL, Kreikemeyer B, Owens RT, LaBrenz S, Narayana SVL, Weinstock GM, Murray BE, Höök M. 1999. Ace is a collagen-binding MSCRAMM from Enterococcus faecalis. J Biol Chem 274:26939–26945 10.1074/jbc.274.38.26939. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Sillanpää J, Xu Y, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE, Höök M. 2004. A family of putative MSCRAMMs from Enterococcus faecalis. Microbiology 150:2069–2078 10.1099/mic.0.27074-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Shiono A, Ike Y. 1999. Isolation of Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolates that efficiently adhere to human bladder carcinoma T24 cells and inhibition of adhesion by fibronectin and trypsin treatment. Infect Immun 67:1585–1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Ton-That H, Marraffini LA, Schneewind O. 2004. Sortases and pilin elements involved in pilus assembly of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Mol Microbiol 53:251–261 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04117.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Ton-That H, Schneewind O. 2004. Assembly of pili in Gram-positive bacteria. Trends Microbiol 12:228–234 10.1016/j.tim.2004.03.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Ton-That H, Schneewind O. 2003. Assembly of pili on the surface of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Mol Microbiol 50:1429–1438 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03782.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Zhao M, Murray BE. 2011. Relative contributions of Ebp pili and the collagen adhesin ace to host extracellular matrix protein adherence and experimental urinary tract infection by Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Infect Immun 79:2901–2910 10.1128/IAI.00038-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. 2015. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:269–284 10.1038/nrmicro3432. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Guiton PS, Hung CS, Hancock LE, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. 2010. Enterococcal biofilm formation and virulence in an optimized murine model of foreign body-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Immun 78:4166–4175 10.1128/IAI.00711-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Nielsen HV, Guiton PS, Kline KA, Port GC, Pinkner JS, Neiers F, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. 2012. The metal ion-dependent adhesion site motif of the Enterococcus faecalis EbpA pilin mediates pilus function in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. MBio 3:e00177-12 10.1128/mBio.00177-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Flores-Mireles AL, Pinkner JS, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. 2014. EbpA vaccine antibodies block binding of Enterococcus faecalis to fibrinogen to prevent catheter-associated bladder infection in mice. Sci Transl Med 6:254ra127 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009384. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Munita JM, Arias CA, Murray BE. 2012. Enterococcal endocarditis: can we win the war? Curr Infect Dis Rep 14:339–349 10.1007/s11908-012-0270-8. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG Jr, Bayer AS, Karchmer AW, Olaison L, Pappas PA, Moreillon P, Chambers ST, Chu VH, Falcó V, Holland DJ, Jones P, Klein JL, Raymond NJ, Read KM, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Wang A, Woods CW, Cabell CH, International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) Investigators. 2009. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med 169:463–473 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.603. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Giannitsioti E, Skiadas I, Antoniadou A, Tsiodras S, Kanavos K, Triantafyllidi H, Giamarellou H, Hellenic Endocarditis Study Group. 2007. Nosocomial vs. community-acquired infective endocarditis in Greece: changing epidemiological profile and mortality risk. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:763–769 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01746.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Cremieux AC, Maziere B, Vallois JM, Ottaviani M, Azancot A, Raffoul H, Bouvet A, Pocidalo JJ, Carbon C. 1989. Evaluation of antibiotic diffusion into cardiac vegetations by quantitative autoradiography. J Infect Dis 159:938–944 10.1093/infdis/159.5.938. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Durack DT. 1975. Experimental bacterial endocarditis. IV. Structure and evolution of very early lesions. J Pathol 115:81–89 10.1002/path.1711150204. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Chuang-Smith ON, Wells CL, Henry-Stanley MJ, Dunny GM. 2010. Acceleration of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation by aggregation substance expression in an ex vivo model of cardiac valve colonization. PLoS One 5:e15798 10.1371/journal.pone.0015798. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Clewell DB, Weaver KE, Dunny GM, Coque TM, Francia MV, Hayes F. 2014. Extrachromosomal and mobile elements in enterococci: transmission, maintenance, and epidemiology. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190424/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Schlievert PM, Dunny GM, Stoehr JA, Assimacopoulos AP. 1997. Aggregation and binding substances enhance pathogenicity in a rabbit model of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis, p 789–791. In Horaud T, Bouvet A, Leclercq R, de Montclos H, Sicard M (ed), Streptococci and the Host. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 418. Springer, Boston, MA. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1825-3_186. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Chuang ON, Schlievert PM, Wells CL, Manias DA, Tripp TJ, Dunny GM. 2009. Multiple functional domains of Enterococcus faecalis aggregation substance Asc10 contribute to endocarditis virulence. Infect Immun 77:539–548 10.1128/IAI.01034-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Low YL, Jakubovics NS, Flatman JC, Jenkinson HF, Smith AW. 2003. Manganese-dependent regulation of the endocarditis-associated virulence factor EfaA of Enterococcus faecalis. J Med Microbiol 52:113–119 10.1099/jmm.0.05039-0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Shepard BD, Gilmore MS. 2002. Differential expression of virulence-related genes in Enterococcus faecalis in response to biological cues in serum and urine. Infect Immun 70:4344–4352 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4344-4352.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Abrantes MC, Kok J, Lopes MF. 2013. EfaR is a major regulator of Enterococcus faecalis manganese transporters and influences processes involved in host colonization and infection. Infect Immun 81:935–944 10.1128/IAI.06377-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Garsin DA, Höök M, Erlandsen SL, Murray BE. 2006. Endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili of Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Invest 116(10):2799-807. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Thurlow LR, Thomas VC, Narayanan S, Olson S, Fleming SD, Hancock LE. 2010. Gelatinase contributes to the pathogenesis of endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 78:4936–4943 10.1128/IAI.01118-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Sillanpää J, Murray BE. 2010. Importance of the collagen adhesin ace in pathogenesis and protection against Enterococcus faecalis experimental endocarditis. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000716 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000716. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Singh KV, La Rosa SL, Somarajan SR, Roh JH, Murray BE. 2015. The fibronectin-binding protein EfbA contributes to pathogenesis and protects against infective endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 83:4487–4494 10.1128/IAI.00884-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Paganelli FL, Huebner J, Singh KV, Zhang X, van Schaik W, Wobser D, Braat JC, Murray BE, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL, Leavis HL. 2016. Genome-wide screening identifies phosphotransferase system permease BepA to be involved in Enterococcus faecium endocarditis and biofilm formation. J Infect Dis 214:189–195 10.1093/infdis/jiw108. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Madsen KT, Skov MN, Gill S, Kemp M. 2017. Virulence factors associated with Enterococcus Faecalis infective endocarditis: a mini review. Open Microbiol J 11:1–11 10.2174/1874285801711010001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Heikens E, Singh KV, Jacques-Palaz KD, van Luit-Asbroek M, Oostdijk EAN, Bonten MJM, Murray BE, Willems RJL. 2011. Contribution of the enterococcal surface protein Esp to pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecium endocarditis. Microbes Infect 13:1185–1190 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.08.006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Murray BE. 2008. Contribution of the collagen adhesin Acm to pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecium in experimental endocarditis. Infect Immun 76:4120–4128 10.1128/IAI.00376-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Giacometti A, Cirioni O, Schimizzi AM, Del Prete MS, Barchiesi F, D’Errico MM, Petrelli E, Scalise G. 2000. Epidemiology and microbiology of surgical wound infections. J Clin Microbiol 38:918–922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, Barza M, Vine AK, Doft BH, Kelsey SF, Blodi BA, Elner SG, Johnson MW, Jessup LM, Khanderia S, Pierson CL, Willis J, McIver F, Stanley S, Sneed SR, Capone AJ, Aaberg TM. 1996. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol 122:1–17 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71959-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Engelbert M, Gilmore MS. 2005. Fas ligand but not complement is critical for control of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2479–2486 10.1167/iovs.04-1139. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Jett BD, Atkuri RV, Gilmore MS. 1998. Enterococcus faecalis localization in experimental endophthalmitis: role of plasmid-encoded aggregation substance. Infect Immun 66:843–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Mylonakis E, Engelbert M, Qin X, Sifri CD, Murray BE, Ausubel FM, Gilmore MS, Calderwood SB. 2002. The Enterococcus faecalisfsrB gene, a key component of the fsr quorum-sensing system, is associated with virulence in the rabbit endophthalmitis model. Infect Immun 70:4678–4681 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4678-4681.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KRN. 2004. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod 30:315–320 10.1097/00004770-200405000-00004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. 2006. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod 32:93–98 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.049. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Zoletti GO, Pereira EM, Schuenck RP, Teixeira LM, Siqueira JF Jr, dos Santos KRN. 2011. Characterization of virulence factors and clonal diversity of Enterococcus faecalis isolates from treated dental root canals. Res Microbiol 162:151–158 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.09.018. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Penas PP, Mayer MPA, Gomes BPFA, Endo M, Pignatari ACC, Bauab KC, Pinheiro ET. 2013. Analysis of genetic lineages and their correlation with virulence genes in Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolates from root canal and systemic infections. J Endod 39:858–864 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.009. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Lin YH, Mickel AK, Chogle S. 2003. Effectiveness of selected materials against Enterococcus faecalis. Part 3. The antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 29:565–566 10.1097/00004770-200309000-00006. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Barroso LS, Habitante SM, Jorge AOC, Faria IS. 2004. Microorganisms growth in endodontic citric-acid solutions with and without microbiological stabilizer. J Endod 30:42–44 10.1097/00004770-200401000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Byström A, Sunvqvist G. 1985. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 18:35–40 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00416.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Hubble TS, Hatton JF, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE, Gillespie MJ. 2003. Influence of Enterococcus faecalis proteases and the collagen-binding protein, Ace, on adhesion to dentin. Oral Microbiol Immunol 18:121–126 10.1034/j.1399-302X.2003.00059.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Harvey BS, Baker CJ, Edwards MS. 1992. Contributions of complement and immunoglobulin to neutrophil-mediated killing of enterococci. Infect Immun 60:3635–3640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Leendertse M, Willems RJL, Giebelen IAJ, Roelofs JJTH, Bonten MJM, van der Poll T. 2009. Neutrophils are essential for rapid clearance of Enterococcus faecium in mice. Infect Immun 77:485–491 10.1128/IAI.00863-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Arduino RC, Murray BE, Rakita RM. 1994. Roles of antibodies and complement in phagocytic killing of enterococci. Infect Immun 62:987–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Gaglani MJ, Baker CJ, Edwards MS. 1997. Contribution of antibody to neutrophil-mediated killing of Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Immunol 17:478–484 10.1023/A:1027371727225. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Novak RM, Holzer TJ, Libertin CR. 1993. Human neutrophil oxidative response and phagocytic killing of clinical and laboratory strains of Enterococcus faecalis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 17:1–6 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90061-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Park SY, Shin YP, Kim CH, Park HJ, Seong YS, Kim BS, Seo SJ, Lee IH. 2008. Immune evasion of Enterococcus faecalis by an extracellular gelatinase that cleaves C3 and iC3b. J Immunol 181:6328–6336 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.6328. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Bottone EJ, Patel L, Patel P, Robin T. 1998. Mucoid encapsulated Enterococcus faecalis: an emerging morphotype isolated from patients with urinary tract infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 31:429–430 10.1016/S0732-8893(98)00027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Bottone EJ. 1999. Encapsulated Enterococcus faecalis: role of encapsulation in persistence in mouse peritoneum in absence of mouse lethality. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 33:65–68 10.1016/S0732-8893(98)00125-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Rakita RM, Vanek NN, Jacques-Palaz K, Mee M, Mariscalco MM, Dunny GM, Snuggs M, Van Winkle WB, Simon SI. 1999. Enterococcus faecalis bearing aggregation substance is resistant to killing by human neutrophils despite phagocytosis and neutrophil activation. Infect Immun 67:6067–6075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Zou J, Shankar N. 2016. The opportunistic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis resists phagosome acidification and autophagy to promote intracellular survival in macrophages. Cell Microbiol 18:831–843 10.1111/cmi.12556. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Baureder M, Reimann R, Hederstedt L. 2012. Contribution of catalase to hydrogen peroxide resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 331:160–164 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02567.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Hanock LE, Gilmore MS, Hancock LE, Gilmore MS. 2002. The capsular polysaccharide of Enterococcus faecalis and its relationship to other polysaccharides in the cell wall 99:1574–1579. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 195.Huebner J, Quaas A, Krueger WA, Goldmann DA, Pier GB. 2000. Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of antibodies to a capsular polysaccharide shared among vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant enterococci. Infect Immun 68:4631–4636 10.1128/IAI.68.8.4631-4636.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Huebner J, Wang Y, Krueger WA, Madoff LC, Martirosian G, Boisot S, Goldmann DA, Kasper DL, Tzianabos AO, Pier GB. 1999. Isolation and chemical characterization of a capsular polysaccharide antigen shared by clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun 67:1213–1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Hufnagel M, Hancock LE, Koch S, Theilacker C, Gilmore MS, Huebner J. 2004. Serological and genetic diversity of capsular polysaccharides in Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Microbiol 42:2548–2557 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2548-2557.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Thurlow LR, Thomas VC, Hancock LE. 2009. Capsular polysaccharide production in Enterococcus faecalis and contribution of CpsF to capsule serospecificity. J Bacteriol 191:6203–6210 10.1128/JB.00592-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Hancock LE, Shepard BD, Gilmore MS. 2003. Molecular analysis of the Enterococcus faecalis serotype 2 polysaccharide determinant. J Bacteriol 185:4393–4401 10.1128/JB.185.15.4393-4401.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Teng F, Jacques-Palaz KD, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2002. Evidence that the enterococcal polysaccharide antigen gene (epa) cluster is widespread in Enterococcus faecalis and influences resistance to phagocytic killing of E. faecalis. Infect Immun 70:2010–2015 10.1128/IAI.70.4.2010-2015.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Xu Y, Murray BE, Weinstock GM. 1998. A cluster of genes involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis from Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Infect Immun 66:4313–4323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Xu Y, Singh KV, Qin X, Murray BE, Weinstock GM. 2000. Analysis of a gene cluster of Enterococcus faecalis involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis. Infect Immun 68:815–823 10.1128/IAI.68.2.815-823.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Geiss-Liebisch S, Rooijakkers SHM, Beczala A, Sanchez-Carballo P, Kruszynska K, Repp C, Sakinc T, Vinogradov E, Holst O, Huebner J, Theilacker C. 2012. Secondary cell wall polymers of Enterococcus faecalis are critical for resistance to complement activation via mannose-binding lectin. J Biol Chem 287:37769–37777 10.1074/jbc.M112.358283. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Theilacker C, Sanchez-Carballo P, Toma I, Fabretti F, Sava I, Kropec A, Holst O, Huebner J. 2009. Glycolipids are involved in biofilm accumulation and prolonged bacteraemia in Enterococcus faecalis. Mol Microbiol 71:1055–1069 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06587.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Rigottier-Gois L, Madec C, Navickas A, Matos RC, Akary-Lepage E, Mistou MY, Serror P. 2015. The surface rhamnopolysaccharide epa of Enterococcus faecalis is a key determinant of intestinal colonization. J Infect Dis 211:62–71 10.1093/infdis/jiu402. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Prajsnar TK, Renshaw SA, Ogryzko NV, Foster SJ, Serror P, Mesnage S. 2013. Zebrafish as a novel vertebrate model to dissect enterococcal pathogenesis. Infect Immun 81:4271–4279 10.1128/IAI.00976-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Singh KV, Lewis RJ, Murray BE. 2009. Importance of the epa locus of Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF in a mouse model of ascending urinary tract infection. J Infect Dis 200:417–420 10.1086/600124. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Montravers P, Mohler J, Saint Julien L, Carbon C. 1997. Evidence of the proinflammatory role of Enterococcus faecalis in polymicrobial peritonitis in rats. Infect Immun 65:144–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Park O-J, Han JY, Baik JE, Jeon JH, Kang S-S, Yun C-H, Oh J-W, Seo HS, Han SH. 2013. Lipoteichoic acid of Enterococcus faecalis induces the expression of chemokines via TLR2 and PAFR signaling pathways. J Leukoc Biol 94:1275–1284 10.1189/jlb.1012522. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Diederich AK, Wobser D, Spiess M, Sava IG, Huebner J, Sakιnç T. 2014. Role of glycolipids in the pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis urinary tract infection. PLoS One 9:e96295 10.1371/journal.pone.0096295. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Yang J, Park OJ, Kim J, Baik JE, Yun CH, Han SH. 2016. Lipoteichoic acid of Enterococcus faecalis inhibits the differentiation of macrophages into osteoclasts. J Endod 42:570–574 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Bhakdi S, Klonisch T, Nuber P, Fischer W. 1991. Stimulation of monokine production by lipoteichoic acids. Infect Immun 59:4614–4620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Bruserud Ø, Wendelbo Ø, Paulsen K. 2004. Lipoteichoic acid derived from Enterococcus faecalis modulates the functional characteristics of both normal peripheral blood leukocytes and native human acute myelogenous leukemia blasts. Eur J Haematol 73:340–350 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00307.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Schlievert PM, Gahr PJ, Assimacopoulos AP, Dinges MM, Stoehr JA, Harmala JW, Hirt H, Dunny GM. 1998. Aggregation and binding substances enhance pathogenicity in rabbit models of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis. Infect Immun 66:218–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Gold OG, Jordan HV, van Houte J. 1975. The prevalence of enterococci in the human mouth and their pathogenicity in animal models. Arch Oral Biol 20:473–477 10.1016/0003-9969(75)90236-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2000. Effects of Enterococcus faecalis fsr genes on production of gelatinase and a serine protease and virulence. Infect Immun 68:2579–2586 10.1128/IAI.68.5.2579-2586.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Huycke MM, Sahm DF, Gilmore MS. 1998. Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future. Emerg Infect Dis 4:239–249 10.3201/eid0402.980211. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Coburn PS, Gilmore MS. 2003. The Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin: a novel toxin active against eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Cell Microbiol 5:661–669 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00310.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Van Tyne D, Martin MJ, Gilmore MS. 2013. Structure, function, and biology of the Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin. Toxins (Basel) 5:895–911 10.3390/toxins5050895. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Haas W, Shepard BD, Gilmore MS. 2002. Two-component regulator of Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin responds to quorum-sensing autoinduction. Nature 415:84–87 10.1038/415084a. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Sifri CD, Mylonakis E, Singh KV, Qin X, Garsin DA, Murray BE, Ausubel FM, Calderwood SB. 2002. Virulence effect of Enterococcus faecalis protease genes and the quorum-sensing locus fsr in Caenorhabditis elegans and mice. Infect Immun 70:5647–5650 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5647-5650.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Engelbert M, Mylonakis E, Ausubel FM, Calderwood SB, Gilmore MS. 2004. Contribution of gelatinase, serine protease, and fsr to the pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. Infect Immun 72:3628–3633 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3628-3633.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Hancock LE, Perego M. 2004. The Enterococcus faecalis fsr two-component system controls biofilm development through production of gelatinase. J Bacteriol 186:5629–5639 10.1128/JB.186.17.5629-5639.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Kristich CJ, Li Y-H, Cvitkovitch DG, Dunny GM. 2004. Esp-independent biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 186:154–163 10.1128/JB.186.1.154-163.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2001. Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J Bacteriol 183:3372–3382 10.1128/JB.183.11.3372-3382.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Nakayama J, Cao Y, Horii T, Sakuda S, Akkermans ADL, de Vos WM, Nagasawa H. 2001. Gelatinase biosynthesis-activating pheromone: a peptide lactone that mediates a quorum sensing in Enterococcus faecalis. Mol Microbiol 41:145–154 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02486.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Mohamed JA, Huang W, Nallapareddy SR, Teng F, Murray BE. 2004. Influence of isolate origin and presence of various genes on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun 72:3658–3663 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3658-3663.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Del Papa MF, Perego M. 2011. Enterococcus faecalis virulence regulator FsrA binding to target promoters. J Bacteriol 193:1527–1532 10.1128/JB.01522-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Dundar H, Brede DA, La Rosa SL, El-Gendy AO, Diep DB, Nes IF. 2015. The fsr quorum-sensing system and cognate gelatinase orchestrate the expression and processing of proprotein EF_1097 into the mature antimicrobial peptide enterocin O16. J Bacteriol 197:2112–2121 10.1128/JB.02513-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Coque TM, Patterson JE, Steckelberg JM, Murray BE. 1995. Incidence of hemolysin, gelatinase, and aggregation substance among enterococci isolated from patients with endocarditis and other infections and from feces of hospitalized and community-based persons. J Infect Dis 171:1223–1229 10.1093/infdis/171.5.1223. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Roberts JC, Singh KV, Okhuysen PC, Murray BE. 2004. Molecular epidemiology of the fsr locus and of gelatinase production among different subsets of Enterococcus faecalis isolates. J Clin Microbiol 42:2317–2320 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2317-2320.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Pillai SK, Sakoulas G, Gold HS, Wennersten C, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC Jr, Inouye RT. 2002. Prevalence of the fsr locus in Enterococcus faecalis infections. J Clin Microbiol 40:2651–2652 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2651-2652.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Biswas PP, Dey S, Adhikari L, Sen A. 2014. Virulence markers of vancomycin resistant enterococci isolated from infected and colonized patients. J Glob Infect Dis 6:157–163 10.4103/0974-777X.145242. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Anderson AC, Jonas D, Huber I, Karygianni L, Wölber J, Hellwig E, Arweiler N, Vach K, Wittmer A, Al-Ahmad A. 2016. Enterococcus faecalis from food, clinical specimens, and oral sites: prevalence of virulence factors in association with biofilm formation. Front Microbiol 6:1534 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Nakayama J, Kariyama R, Kumon H. 2002. Description of a 23.9-kilobase chromosomal deletion containing a region encoding fsr genes which mainly determines the gelatinase-negative phenotype of clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis in urine. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3152–3155 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3152-3155.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Rice LB, Carias L, Rudin S, Vael C, Goossens H, Konstabel C, Klare I, Nallapareddy SR, Huang W, Murray BE. 2003. A potential virulence gene, hylEfm, predominates in Enterococcus faecium of clinical origin. J Infect Dis 187:508–512 10.1086/367711. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Leavis H, Top J, Shankar N, Borgen K, Bonten M, van Embden J, Willems RJL. 2004. A novel putative enterococcal pathogenicity island linked to the esp virulence gene of Enterococcus faecium and associated with epidemicity. J Bacteriol 186:672–682 10.1128/JB.186.3.672-682.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.van Schaik W, Top J, Riley DR, Boekhorst J, Vrijenhoek JEP, Schapendonk CME, Hendrickx AP, Nijman IJ, Bonten MJM, Tettelin H, Willems RJL. 2010. Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island. BMC Genomics 11:239 10.1186/1471-2164-11-239. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Moy TI, Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB, Ausubel FM, Calderwood SB. 2004. Cytotoxicity of hydrogen peroxide produced by Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun 72:4512–4520 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4512-4520.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Huycke MM, Joyce W, Wack MF. 1996. Augmented production of extracellular superoxide by blood isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. J Infect Dis 173:743–746 10.1093/infdis/173.3.743. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Ramsey M, Hartke A, Huycke M. 2014. The physiology and metabolism of enterococci, p 1–43. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Paulsen IT, Banerjei L, Myers GSA, Nelson KE, Seshadri R, Read TD, Fouts DE, Eisen JA, Gill SR, Heidelberg JF, Tettelin H, Dodson RJ, Umayam L, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Daugherty S, DeBoy RT, Durkin S, Kolonay J, Madupu R, Nelson W, Vamathevan J, Tran B, Upton J, Hansen T, Shetty J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Radune D, Ketchum KA, Dougherty BA, Fraser CM. 2003. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science 299:2071–2074. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Bourgogne A, Garsin DA, Qin X, Singh KV, Sillanpaa J, Yerrapragada S, Ding Y, Dugan-Rocha S, Buhay C, Shen H, Chen G, Williams G, Muzny D, Maadani A, Fox KA, Gioia J, Chen L, Shang Y, Arias CA, Nallapareddy SR, Zhao M, Prakash VP, Chowdhury S, Jiang H, Gibbs RA, Murray BE, Highlander SK, Weinstock GM. 2008. Large scale variation in Enterococcus faecalis illustrated by the genome analysis of strain OG1RF. Genome Biol 9:R110 10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r110. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.McBride SM, Coburn PS, Baghdayan AS, Willems RJL, Grande MJ, Shankar N, Gilmore MS. 2009. Genetic variation and evolution of the pathogenicity island of Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 191:3392–3402 10.1128/JB.00031-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Palmer KL, Gilmore MS. 2010. Multidrug-resistant enterococci lack CRISPR-cas. MBio 1:e00227-10 10.1128/mBio.00227-10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Homan WL, Tribe D, Poznanski S, Li M, Hogg G, Spalburg E, Van Embden JDA, Willems RJL. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 40:1963–1971 10.1128/JCM.40.6.1963-1971.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Bonten MJM, Robinson DA, Top J, Nallapareddy SR, Torres C, Coque TM, Cantón R, Baquero F, Murray BE, del Campo R, Willems RJL. 2006. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecalis reveals hospital-adapted genetic complexes in a background of high rates of recombination. J Clin Microbiol 44:2220–2228 10.1128/JCM.02596-05. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Willems RJL, Top J, van Schaik W, Leavis H, Bonten M, Sirén J, Hanage WP, Corander J. 2012. Restricted gene flow among hospital subpopulations of Enterococcus faecium. MBio 3:e00151-12 10.1128/mBio.00151-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.McBride SM, Fischetti VA, Leblanc DJ, Moellering RC Jr, Gilmore MS. 2007. Genetic diversity among Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS One 2:e582 10.1371/journal.pone.0000582. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Raven KE, Reuter S, Gouliouris T, Reynolds R, Russell JE, Brown NM, Török ME, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ. 2016. Genome-based characterization of hospital-adapted Enterococcus faecalis lineages. Nat Microbiol 1:15033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Kim EB, Marco ML. 2014. Nonclinical and clinical Enterococcus faecium strains, but not Enterococcus faecalis strains, have distinct structural and functional genomic features. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:154–165 10.1128/AEM.03108-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Galloway-Peña J, Roh JH, Latorre M, Qin X, Murray BE. 2012. Genomic and SNP analyses demonstrate a distant separation of the hospital and community-associated clades of Enterococcus faecium. PLoS One 7:e30187 10.1371/journal.pone.0030187. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Palmer KL, Godfrey P, Griggs A, Kos VN, Zucker J, Desjardins C, Cerqueira G, Gevers D, Walker S, Wortman J, Feldgarden M, Haas B, Birren B, Gilmore MS. 2012. Comparative genomics of enterococci: variation in Enterococcus faecalis, clade structure in E. faecium, and defining characteristics of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. MBio 3:e00318-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Van Schaik W, Willems RJLJLL. 2010. Genome-based insights into the evolution of enterococci. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:527–532. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Goh HMS, Yong MHA, Chong KKL, Kline KA, Kline KA. 2017. Model systems for the study of enterococcal colonization and infection. Virulence 8:1525–1562 10.1080/21505594.2017.1279766. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Yuen GJ, Ausubel FM. 2014. Enterococcus infection biology: lessons from invertebrate host models. J Microbiol 52:200–210 10.1007/s12275-014-4011-6. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Cox CR, Gilmore MS. 2007. Native microbial colonization of Drosophila melanogaster and its use as a model of Enterococcus faecalis pathogenesis. Infect Immun 75:1565–1576 10.1128/IAI.01496-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Lebreton F, Le Bras F, Reffuveille F, Ladjouzi R, Giard J-C, Leclercq R, Cattoir V. 2011. Galleria mellonella as a model for studying Enterococcus faecium host persistence. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 21:191–196 10.1159/000332737. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Moy TI, Ball AR, Anklesaria Z, Casadei G, Lewis K, Ausubel FM. 2006. Identification of novel antimicrobials using a live-animal infection model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:10414–10419 10.1073/pnas.0604055103. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Garrison PK, Freedman LR. 1970. Experimental endocarditis. I. Staphylococcal endocarditis in rabbits resulting from placement of a polyethylene catheter in the right side of the heart. Yale J Biol Med 42:394–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Santoro J, Levison ME. 1978. Rat model of experimental endocarditis. Infect Immun 19:915–918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Barnes AMT, Dale JL, Chen Y, Manias DA, Greenwood Quaintance KE, Karau MK, Kashyap PC, Patel R, Wells CL, Dunny GM. 2017. Enterococcus faecalis readily colonizes the entire gastrointestinal tract and forms biofilms in a germ-free mouse model. Virulence 8:282–296 10.1080/21505594.2016.1208890. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Leendertse M, Willems RJ, Giebelen IA, van den Pangaart PS, Wiersinga WJ, de Vos AF, Florquin S, Bonten MJ, van der Poll T, Leendertse M, De Vos AF, Van Der Poll T. 2008. TLR2-dependent MyD88 signaling contributes to early host defense in murine Enterococcus faecium peritonitis. J Immunol 180:4865–4874 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4865. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Johnson JR, Clabots C, Hirt H, Waters C, Dunny G. 2004. Enterococcal aggregation substance and binding substance are not major contributors to urinary tract colonization by Enterococcus faecalis in a mouse model of ascending unobstructed urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 72:2445–2448 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2445-2448.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Kau AL, Martin SM, Lyon W, Hayes E, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. 2005. Enterococcus faecalis tropism for the kidneys in the urinary tract of C57BL/6J mice. Infect Immun 73:2461–2468 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2461-2468.2005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Stevens SX, Jensen HG, Jett BD, Gilmore MS. 1992. A hemolysin-encoding plasmid contributes to bacterial virulence in experimental Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:1650–1656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Hirt H, Schlievert PM, Dunny GM. 2002. In vivo induction of virulence and antibiotic resistance transfer in Enterococcus faecalis mediated by the sex pheromone-sensing system of pCF10. Infect Immun 70:716–723 10.1128/IAI.70.2.716-723.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Trotter KM, Dunny GM. 1990. Mutants of Enterococcus faecalis deficient as recipients in mating with donors carrying pheromone-inducible plasmids. Plasmid 24:57–67 10.1016/0147-619X(90)90025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
