Summary
Aims
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been widely used as postinjury treatment; however, we investigate its ability to mitigate potential damage as a preconditioning option. Here, we tested the hypothesis that HBOT preconditioning mitigates cell death in primary rat neuronal cells (PRNCs) through the transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes.
Methods
Primary rat neuronal cells were subjected to a 90‐minute HBOT treatment at 2.5 absolute atmospheres prior to either tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐alpha) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injury to simulate the inflammation‐plagued secondary cell death associated with stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI). After incubation with TNF‐alpha or LPS, the cell viability of each group was examined.
Results
There was a significant increase of cell viability accompanied by mitochondrial transfer in the injury groups that received HBOT preconditioning compared to the injury alone groups (44 ± 5.2 vs 68 ± 4.48, n = 20, P < 0.05). The transfer of mitochondria directly after HBOT treatment was visualized by capturing images in 5‐minute intervals, which revealed that the robust transfer of mitochondria begins soon after HBOT and persisted throughout the treatment.
Conclusion
This study shows that HBOT preconditioning stands as a robust prophylactic treatment for sequestration of inflammation inherent in stroke and TBI, possibly facilitating the transfer of resilient mitochondria from astrocytes to inflammation‐susceptible neuronal cells in mitigating cell death.
Keywords: hyperbaric, mitochondria transfer, preconditioning, stroke, traumatic brain injury
1. INTRODUCTION
Central nervous systems (CNS) diseases encompass a wide variety of pathologies.1 However, stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are the most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases of adult‐brain in the United States, which can strike a wide spectrum of people.1 According to the American Heart Association, stroke is the fifth‐leading cause of death in the United States, killing approximately 130 000 each year. The associated healthcare costs for stroke exceed $33 billion per year. Stroke is the leading cause of long‐term disability in the United States.2 Comparably, in 2013, TBI resulted in 2.8 million emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, accompanying the approximately 3.1 million people living with TBI‐related diseases, with an associated healthcare cost of $76.5 billion in 2012.3, 4 Stroke and TBI share some similar pathologies regarding the primary and secondary cell death mechanism largely resulting from chronic neuroinflammation.5 A key common pathological feature is the formation of a necrotic tissue core, which is unrecoverable, following stroke and TBI.6, 7, 8 The onset and progression of secondary cell death of both diseases has been linked to the blood‐brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, allowing various inflammatory cytokines to permeate the BBB, infiltrate the brain, and upregulate the inflammatory response,9 altogether worsening the disease outcomes. In addition, several other exacerbating factors, such as oxidative stress, apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction, have been shown to contribute to additional neurodegeneration following BBB damage.10, 11, 12, 13
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been a treatment of interest for stroke as well as TBI over the past decade.14, 15 HBOT utilizes a pressurized chamber, usually 2‐3 absolute atmospheres (ATA), resulting in hyperoxygenation of tissues, inducing local angiogenesis in damaged regions of the body and recruitment of progenitor cells to the damaged regions.16, 17, 18 The common, FDA‐approved, uses of HBOT include treating patients with open wounds, often resulting from burn injuries or diabetic ulcers.19, 20 The ability for a patient to undergo HBOT during the acute stage of stroke has been difficult to accomplish due to the overall timeline of the ischemic event and a limited number of facilities having the necessary equipment; therefore, the chronic stages of stroke have been targeted as a possible therapeutic window for HBOT.14 This regimen seeks to ameliorate cognitive impairments synonymous with stroke, such as memory loss, language and comprehension deficits.14, 21 Similarly, the unforeseen occurrence of TBI presents as a logistical hurdle in introducing HBOT as an acute treatment regimen for brain trauma patients.22 Mechanistically, the secondary cell death with wider therapeutic window, characterized by inflammation has become the main target of HBOT treatment research, as reducing the levels of inflammatory cytokines has been linked to limiting peri‐infarct/peri‐impact tissue loss.23, 24 However, the therapeutic mechanism of HBOT mediating the sequestration of inflammation is not fully understood.25
A key unexplored research theme in the use of HBOT as a treatment for stroke and TBI involves investigations into the role of the preconditioning paradigm. Several studies have shown the preclinical efficacy of HBOT preconditioning for attenuating neuronal cell loss following an ischemic or traumatic event, but little mechanism‐based assessment has elucidated the therapeutic pathways solicited by HBOT in these studies.26, 27, 28, 29 The importance of alternative therapies for stroke and TBI patients has become evident.30 To this end, cognizant that mitochondrial dysfunction closely approximates a pathologic inflammatory response resulting from ischemia and traumatic insult, evaluation of the mitochondria poses as a logical target of investigation in order to begin to understand the mechanism of HBOT preconditioning.31, 32, 33 Of note, healthy extracellular mitochondria have been demonstrated to transfer from astrocytes into neurons following stroke resulting in reduced neuronal cell death.34
In this study, we explored the ability of HBOT preconditioning to limit neuronal cell death following inflammatory insults, mimicking the secondary cell death associated with ischemic stroke and TBI. More importantly, the potential role of HBOT in transferring mitochondria as a therapeutic mechanism in facilitating survival of the neuronal cells was also examined.35 We hypothesized that a transfer of astrocytic mitochondria into neurons, following HBOT preconditioning, would improve neuronal cell viability following inflammatory insults.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Cell culture
The research procedures involving animals were approved by the USF Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Primary rat neuronal cells (PRNCs) were dissected from cerebral cortices of E18 Sprague‐Dawley rat embryos. Cells were seeded on poly‐D‐lysine (Fisher Scientific, ICN10269480) coated glass coverslips in 6‐well plates (Fisher Scientific, 0877124) and cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Media (DMEM, Fisher Scientific, 10567‐014) containing 4.5 g/L glucose, l‐glutamine, 25 mmol/L HEPES, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Fisher Scientific, SH3007103) and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic at a density of 1.5 × 106 cells per well. After 24 hours, the medium was changed to Neurobasal medium (Fisher Scientific, 21103049), supplemented with B‐27 (Fisher Scientific, 17504044). Cells were cultured in incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were utilized for experiments 7 days after seeding. Astrocytes derived from U‐87 MG Astrocyte Cell Line (Sigma, 89081402). The cells were passaged six times for growth in T‐175 flasks (Fisher Scientific, 12562001) in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Fisher Scientific, 15140122). One day prior to coculture, the astrocytes were seeded on a 0.4 μm mesh plate insert (Fisher Scientific, 0877115) in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well. On day 7 postseeding, the astrocyte mesh inserts were placed in coculture with the PRNCs (Figure 1).
2.2. HBOT
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was administered using an OxyCure 3000 hyperbaric incubator (OxyHeal Health Group, National City, CA, USA). The HBOT regimen consisted of a single treatment at 2.5 absolute atmospheres lasting 90 minutes, with a 10‐minute ascent and descent period (Figure 2). Following HBOT the cultures were returned to an incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cultures remained in incubation for 24 hours prior to insult.
2.3. Injury
To recreate the secondary cell death of inflammation observed in stroke and TBI, we employed two established inflammation‐inducing agents.36, 37, 38 The tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐alpha, Fisher Scientific, 210TA020CF) only and HBOT plus TNF‐alpha cocultures were treated with 50 ng/mL of TNF‐alpha (RD) for 24 hours39 in the incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. The Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Fisher Scientific, NC0202558) injury and HBOT plus LPS groups were treated with 100 ng/mL of LPS and returned to the incubator.40 Each insult used the same medium as previously described for neurons and astrocytes. The control plates remained untreated.
2.4. Measurement of cell viability
After the 24‐hour incubation with TNF‐alpha and LPS, all groups were assessed for cell viability using calcein‐AM (Fisher Scientific, 4892010K). After treatment, the astrocyte mesh inserts were removed and the remaining 6‐well dish was incubated with 1 μmol/L calcein‐AM for 30 minutes in the incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. Bright green fluorescence was retained within living cells. Five images were captured per well in randomly selected regions to determine cell viability at 10×. Analysis of cell intensity was performed by ImageJ (NIH). During cell counting, 30.25 cm2 regions were counted using ImageJ and calculated to determine the number of cells per 1 cm2. Analysis of data was conducted using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA).
2.5. Immunocytochemistry
Prior to coculturing neurons and astrocytes, each was labeled with mitotracker, in order to visualize mitochondria belonging to each cell type. Astrocytes were labeled with Mitotracker Deep Red FM (Fisher Scientific, M22426) for 30 minutes in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Fisher Scientific, 15‐140‐122) with 500 nmol/L of Mitotracker Deep Red. Neurons were labeled with Mitotracker Green FM (Fisher Scientific, M7514) for 30 minutes in Neurobasal with B‐27 supplement at 37°C and 5% CO2. Following HBOT and insult, cells were rinsed with Dulbecco's phosphate‐buffered saline with calcium and magnesium (DPBS, Fisher Scientific, 14080055) and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 minutes at room temperature. Cells were rinsed again with DPBS. Cultures were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton‐X for 5 minutes at room temperature. Plates were rinsed with DPBS before blocking with 5% goat serum at room temperature. Mouse anti‐MAP2 1 μg/mL was added to each well and incubated overnight at 4°C. After rinsing several times with DPBS, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti‐mouse 1 μg/mL was added and incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature. Plates were then rinsed with DPBS, and coverslips were placed on slides using Vectashield with 4,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole DAPI (Fisher Scientific, NC9524612). Immunostaining images were captured using an Olympus FV1200 Spectral Inverted Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope. Colocalizations of astrocytic mitochondria with PRNCs as well as with endogenous mitochondria from PRNCs were assessed.
2.6. Statistics
The data were evaluated using ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's tests. Statistical significance was preset at P < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± SE from quintuplicates of each treatment condition.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment rescues cell viability
Calcein‐AM cell viability staining was performed and imaged using a fluorescent inverted microscope (Figure 3). Cell viability of E18 cortical neurons cocultured with U‐87 astrocytes was measured via cell counting of neurons and intensity of calcein staining. Control E18 cortical neurons had an average of 7.11 cells per 1 cm2 and an average intensity of 4290. E18 cortical neurons exposed only to HBOT had an average of 7.15 cells per 1 cm2 and an average intensity of 3744. Cortical neurons administered TNF‐alpha had an average of 5.60 cells per 1 cm2 and an average intensity of 1507, while cortical neurons administered LPS had an average of 3.56 cells per 1 cm2 and an average intensity of 2025. The cortical neurons exposed to HBOT and then administered TNF‐alpha had an average of 5.34 cells per 1 cm2 and an average intensity of 3045. The cortical neurons exposed to HBOT and then received LPS had an average of 5.64 cells per 1 cm2 and an average intensity of 3192. A One‐way ANOVA was conducted to analyze the effect of HBOT on each condition. There was a statistically significant effect of HBOT on viable cell count per 1 cm2 for all six conditions (F 5,167 = 33.18, P < 0.001). There was also a significant effect of HBOT on cell intensity for all six conditions (F 5,182 = 22.29, P < 0.001).
Post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni's tests indicated the mean number of cells per 1 cm2 for the control group was not significantly different than the HBOT group. However, the TNF‐alpha and LPS groups showed a significant reduction when compared to the control group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). HBOT preconditioning prior to TNF‐alpha insult resulted in a significant increase in cell bodies when compared to the TNF‐alpha group (P < 0.001). Similarly, the HBOT + LPS group demonstrated a significant increase in viable cell bodies versus the LPS group (P < 0.001).
Post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni's tests were also conducted for cell intensity. These results reiterated there was no significant difference in the means between the control group and the HBOT preconditioning group. Again, there was a significant reduction of intensity in the TNF‐alpha and LPS groups when compared to the control group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). When HBOT was administered prior to TNF‐alpha it yielded a significantly increased intensity versus the TNF‐alpha group (P < 0.001). Also, HBOT preconditioning prior to LPS administration also resulted in a significant increase in intensity versus the LPS group (P < 0.01).
3.2. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy stimulates mitochondria transfer
Mitochondria transfer was imaged using a scanning laser confocal microscope (Figure 4). The percentage of neuronal cell bodies containing astrocyte mitochondria was analyzed. The control cortical neurons demonstrated an average of 21.25% of neuronal cell bodies containing astrocytic mitochondria. The HBOT group which received only HBOT preconditioning and no insult had an average of 42.17% of neuronal cell bodies containing astrocytic mitochondria. Similarly, neurons that received TNF‐alpha and LPS treatment had an average of 44.23% and 51.71% of neuronal cell bodies containing astrocytic mitochondria, respectively. Cortical neurons exposed to HBOT preconditioning prior to TNF‐alpha insult had an average of 68.21% of neuronal cell bodies containing astrocytic mitochondria, while neurons exposed to HBOT prior to LPS insult had an average of 71.52% of neuronal cell bodies containing astrocytic mitochondria. There was a statistically significant effect of HBOT on the percentage of astrocyte mitochondria in neuronal cells for all six conditions (F 5, 103 = 19.32, P < 0.001).
Post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni's tests indicated the average percentage of neuronal cells containing astrocytic mitochondria for the control group was significantly less than the HBOT preconditioning only group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the HBOT preconditioning only group with the TNF‐alpha and LPS groups. HBOT preconditioning prior to TNF‐alpha insult resulted in a significant increase in astrocytic mitochondria presence in neuronal cell bodies when compared to the TNF‐alpha group (P < 0.01). Although the HBOT + LPS group failed to reach statistical significance compared to the LPS group, it displays a similar trend to the TNF‐alpha and TNF‐alpha HBOT preconditioning comparison (Figure 4).
3.3. Live imaging following HBOT demonstrates mitochondrial transfer
Live imaging was conducted using a scanning laser confocal microscope to capture images at 5‐minute intervals over a 30‐minute period (Figure 5). At acute period after HBOT initiation, live imaging revealed absence of Mitotracker‐labeled mitochondria at 0 minute but its presence at 5 minutes (Figure 5). Similarly, at delayed period following HBOT initiation between 15 minutes and 20 minutes, migration of Mitotracker‐labeled astrocytic mitochondria was visualized (Figure 5).
4. DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrated the therapeutic effects of HBOT preconditioning in protecting against the secondary cell death associated with cerebrovascular events, specifically stroke, and TBI. Primary neurons that were exposed to HBOT at 24 hours prior to an inflammatory insult exhibited a significant reduction in cell death compared to the injury‐only groups. Further analysis revealed substantial increase of astrocytic mitochondria in the inflammation‐insulted primary neurons, particularly in the HBOT‐preconditioned groups. Altogether, these results suggest HBOT reduces the deleterious inflammatory response, potentially through the transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes to neurons highlighting a highly innovative mechanistic pathway mediating the therapeutic efficacy of HBOT preconditioning.
Mitochondrial dysfunction stands as a therapeutic target in stroke and TBI due to its role in the secondary injury mechanism.41, 42 However, HBOT as a treatment for cerebrovascular diseases has yielded mixed results.14 The initiation of HBOT may dictate the therapeutic, or detrimental, outcomes. To date, the modality of HBOT preconditioning has been largely neglected; HBOT's use as a prophylactic treatment for cerebrovascular diseases has only recently come into the spotlight for stroke and TBI research. Recent studies have postulated various mechanisms underlying HBOT's neuroprotective effects, including stabilizing the BBB and reducing inflammation.43, 44, 45, 46 That BBB breakdown and inflammatory response are closely associated with mitochondrial impairment provided the impetus in the present study to examine the role of mitochondria as a therapeutic target of HBOT.47, 48 Indeed, the transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes into neurons was observed after stroke.34 Here, we showed that astrocytic mitochondria also transferred to neurons under ambient condition or when exposed to an inflammatory insult, but such transfer was more robustly recognized when treated with HBOT prophylactically. These findings form the basis for prophylactic HBOT for individuals who are at high risk of cerebrovascular events, specifically stroke and TBI, providing a method to reduce the Inflammation‐plagued secondary cell death.
We found a substantial increase of astrocytic mitochondria in the primary neurons particularly in the HBOT‐preconditioned groups via Mitotracker labeling. Although there appears to be a natural transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes to neurons, as seen in the control cells grown under ambient cell culture condition, the presence of an injury to the neurons with exposure to TNF‐alpha or LPS significantly increased this astrocytic mitochondrial transfer (Figure 4). Additionally, HBOT preconditioning under ambient condition facilitated the astrocytic mitochondrial transfer when compared to the TNF‐alpha and LPS only groups (Figure 4). The combination of preconditioning and inflammatory insult further increased the astrocytic mitochondrial transfer (Figure 4), suggesting that neurons primed with a surplus of astrocyte mitochondria were better metabolically equipped to survive an inflammatory insult compared to neurons with only a small number of astrocytic mitochondria. That astrocytic mitochondria may be more resistant to insults than neuronal mitochondria partially supports the notion that astrocytes in general do not easily succumb to cell death after stroke compared to neurons.35, 49
Of equal translational importance, we also demonstrated that administration of HBOT at 2.5 ATA for 90 minutes was well tolerated as evidenced by maintained neuronal cell viability, highlighting the safety of the HBOT as a prophylactic treatment. Such initiation of HBOT before injury led to a significant neuroprotective effect (Figure 3). In addition, we found that the transfer of mitochondria occurred immediately within a short period (ie, 5 minutes) following HBOT (Figure 6) and persisted at least up to 20 minutes post‐HBOT (Figure 6). This observation of effective transfer of mitochondria even with acute HBOT prior to injury supports the use of a short bout of HBOT at low ATA as a powerful approach to induce neuroprotection, which circumvents reported adverse effects of prolonged HBOT at high ATA.50, 51
While not significantly detracting from our conclusions, there are limitations to this investigation. The live imaging obtained was conducted after completion of HBOT exposure, thereby preventing us from accurately pinpointing the onset of mitochondria transfers. Moreover, although a single bout of HBOT was shown here as safe and effective in promoting neuroprotection, repeated short HBOT exposures may provide more stable and long‐lasting functional outcomes considering the devastating neurological deficits acutely and chronically after a cerebrovascular event. The combination of pre‐ and postinjury HBOT will also warrant additional studies. In order to translate this preconditioning paradigm to the clinic, identification of a candidate population of individuals who are at an increased risk of cerebrovascular injury will be key to the successful enrollment of patients. The observed in vitro HBOT results definitely will require validation in in vivo disease models. In the end, testing a variety of HBOT conditions in clinically relevant models are critical to achieving the optimal safe and effective regimen of mitochondria transfer‐mediated neuroprotection.52 Recent studies have established successful protocols for testing HBOT in rodent models for both single and multiple treatments.53 Due to prior FDA‐approved indications, HBOT has an established infrastructure in clinics allowing for it to be quickly implemented once treatments are optimized for humans.19, 20
HBOT preconditioning poses as a prophylactic treatment for sequestration of inflammation, which is a pathological condition rampant in many cerebrovascular diseases. HBOT may be a leading alternative treatment for TBI and stroke modalities as steers away from invasive procedures such as exogenous cell transplantation following a major cerebrovascular event.54 Mitochondrial transfer from astrocytes to neurons is a potential primary mechanism of action of HBOT to conferring neuroprotective effects against inflammation. The ability to limit the severity of cerebrovascular injury in identified at‐risk individuals may reduce the health burden and socioeconomic load of these diseases on our healthcare system and economy.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by Dr. Cesario Borlongan at the Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA. All research materials, including data, reported in this study can be easily accessed by contacting Dr. Cesario Borlongan.
Lippert T, Borlongan CV. Prophylactic treatment of hyperbaric oxygen treatment mitigates inflammatory response via mitochondria transfer. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019;25:815–823. 10.1111/cns.13124
REFERENCES
- 1. Borlongan CV, Burns J, Tajiri N, et al. Epidemiological survey‐based formulae to approximate incidence and prevalence of neurological disorders in the United States: a meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics‐2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146‐e603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic brain injury‐related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths ‐ United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(9):815‐16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(5):986‐995.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Borlongan CV, Chopp M, Steinberg GK, et al. Potential of stem/progenitor cells in treating stroke: the missing steps in translating cell therapy from laboratory to clinic. Regen Med. 2008;3(3):249‐250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Nguyen H, Aum D, Mashkouri S, et al. Growth factor therapy sequesters inflammation in affording neuroprotection in cerebrovascular diseases. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(8):915‐926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kumar A, Loane DJ. Neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury: opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(8):1191‐1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Giunta B, Obregon D, Velisetty R, Sanberg PR, Borlongan CV, Tan J. The immunology of traumatic brain injury: a prime target for Alzheimer's disease prevention. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Prakash R, Carmichael ST. Blood‐brain barrier breakdown and neovascularization processes after stroke and traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015;28(6):556‐564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Readnower RD, Chavko M, Adeeb S, et al. Increase in blood‐brain barrier permeability, oxidative stress, and activated microglia in a rat model of blast‐induced traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88(16):3530‐3539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zuo W, Zhang S, Xia CY, Guo XF, He WB, Chen NH. Mitochondria autophagy is induced after hypoxic/ischemic stress in a Drp1 dependent manner: the role of inhibition of Drp1 in ischemic brain damage. Neuropharmacology. 2014;86:103‐115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Okazawa H, Ikawa M, Tsujikawa T, Kiyono Y, Yoneda M. Brain imaging for oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;58(4):387‐397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Liu B, Zhang Y‐H, Jiang Y, et al. Gadd45b is a novel mediator of neuronal apoptosis in ischemic stroke. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11(3):353‐360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhai WW, Sun L, Yu ZQ, Chen G. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in experimental and clinical stroke. Med Gas Res. 2016;6(2):111‐118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hu Q, Manaenko A, Xu T, Guo Z, Tang J, Zhang JH. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for traumatic brain injury: bench‐to‐bedside. Med Gas Res. 2016;6(2):102‐110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tepper OM, Capla JM, Galiano RD, et al. Adult vasculogenesis occurs through in situ recruitment, proliferation, and tubulization of circulating bone marrow‐derived cells. Blood. 2005;105(3):1068‐1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Thom SR. Hyperbaric oxygen: its mechanisms and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(Suppl 1):131S‐141S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bhutani S, Vishwanath G. Hyperbaric oxygen and wound healing. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45(2):316‐324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Stoekenbroek RM, Santema TB, Legemate DA, Ubbink DT, van den Brink A, Koelemay MJ. Hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47(6):647‐655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Selcuk CT, Ozalp B, Durgun M, et al. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen treatment on the healing of burn wounds in nicotinized and nonnicotinized rats. J Burn Care Res. 2013;34(4):e237‐243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sun JH, Tan L, Yu JT. Post‐stroke cognitive impairment: epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2(8):80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Seule M, Brunner T, Mack A, Hildebrandt G, Fournier JY. Neurosurgical and Intensive Care Management of Traumatic Brain Injury. Facial Plast Surg. 2015;31(4):325‐331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Meng XE, Zhang Y, Li N, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen alleviates secondary brain injury after trauma through inhibition of TLR4/NF‐kappaB signaling pathway. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:284‐288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Shojo H, Kaneko Y, Mabuchi T, Kibayashi K, Adachi N, Borlongan CV. Genetic and histologic evidence implicates role of inflammation in traumatic brain injury‐induced apoptosis in the rat cerebral cortex following moderate fluid percussion injury. Neuroscience. 2010;171(4):1273‐1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gill AL, Bell CN. Hyperbaric oxygen: its uses, mechanisms of action and outcomes. QJM. 2004;97(7):385‐395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gamdzyk M, Malek M, Bratek E, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen and hyperbaric air preconditioning induces ischemic tolerance to transient forebrain ischemia in the gerbil. Brain Res. 2016;1648(Pt A):257‐265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yang L, Tang J, Chen Q, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning attenuates neuroinflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats by regulating microglia characteristics. Brain Res. 2015;1627:21‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Andre‐Levigne D, Modarressi A, Pignel R, Bochaton‐Piallat ML, Pittet‐Cuenod B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy promotes wound repair in ischemic and hyperglycemic conditions, increasing tissue perfusion and collagen deposition. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24(6):954‐965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Dougherty JE. The role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in crush injuries. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2013;36(3):299‐309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Newman MB, Misiuta I, Willing AE, et al. Tumorigenicity issues of embryonic carcinoma‐derived stem cells: relevance to surgical trials using NT2 and hNT neural cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2005;14(1):29‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cheng G, Kong RH, Zhang LM, Zhang JN. Mitochondria in traumatic brain injury and mitochondrial‐targeted multipotential therapeutic strategies. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167(4):699‐719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Muriach M, Flores‐Bellver M, Romero FJ, Barcia JM. Diabetes and the brain: oxidative stress, inflammation, and autophagy. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:102158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kamp DW, Shacter E, Weitzman SA. Chronic inflammation and cancer: the role of the mitochondria. Oncology (Williston Park). 2011;25(5):400‐410, 413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hayakawa K, Esposito E, Wang X, et al. Transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes to neurons after stroke. Nature. 2016;535(7613):551‐555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Borlongan CV, Yamamoto M, Takei N, et al. Glial cell survival is enhanced during melatonin‐induced neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia. FASEB J. 2000;14(10):1307‐1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Fahrig T, Gerlach I, Horvath E. A synthetic derivative of the natural product rocaglaol is a potent inhibitor of cytokine‐mediated signaling and shows neuroprotective activity in vitro and in animal models of Parkinson's disease and traumatic brain injury. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67(5):1544‐1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rosenzweig HL, Minami M, Lessov NS, et al. Endotoxin preconditioning protects against the cytotoxic effects of TNFalpha after stroke: a novel role for TNFalpha in LPS‐ischemic tolerance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(10):1663‐1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Figiel I. Pro‐inflammatory cytokine TNF‐alpha as a neuroprotective agent in the brain. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2008;68(4):526‐534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Neniskyte U, Vilalta A, Brown GC. Tumour necrosis factor alpha‐induced neuronal loss is mediated by microglial phagocytosis. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(17):2952‐2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Gresa‐Arribas N, Vieitez C, Dentesano G, Serratosa J, Saura J, Sola C. Modelling neuroinflammation in vitro: a tool to test the potential neuroprotective effect of anti‐inflammatory agents. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hiebert JB, Shen Q, Thimmesch AR, Pierce JD. Traumatic brain injury and mitochondrial dysfunction. Am J Med Sci. 2015;350(2):132‐138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Yang L, Hei MY, Dai JJ, Hu N, Xiang XY. Effect of hyperbaric oxygenation on mitochondrial function of neuronal cells in the cortex of neonatal rats after hypoxic‐ischemic brain damage. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(5):e5187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Jadhav V, Zhang JH. Surgical brain injury: prevention is better than cure. Front Biosci. 2008;13:3793‐3797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ostrowski RP, Graupner G, Titova E, et al. The hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning‐induced brain protection is mediated by a reduction of early apoptosis after transient global cerebral ischemia. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;29(1):815‐13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Soejima Y, Ostrowski RP, Manaenko A, Fujii M, Tang J, Zhang JH. Hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning attenuates hyperglycemia enhanced hemorrhagic transformation after transient MCAO in rats. Med Gas Res. 2012;2(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Chen SY, Huang E, Wang V, Fan YM, Ho CF, Yip PK. Improvement of clinical outcome and cerebral perfusion in a patient of atherosclerotic cerebral infarction after repetitive hyperbaric oxygen treatment–a case report and literature review. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2011;38(5):375‐379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Aliev G, Smith MA, de la Torre JC, Perry G. Mitochondria as a primary target for vascular hypoperfusion and oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease. Mitochondrion. 2004;4(5‐6):649‐663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Friedman A, Kaufer D, Heinemann U. Blood‐brain barrier breakdown‐inducing astrocytic transformation: novel targets for the prevention of epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2009;85(2‐3):142‐149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Xia CF, Yin H, Borlongan CV, Chao J, Chao L. Adrenomedullin gene delivery protects against cerebral ischemic injury by promoting astrocyte migration and survival. Hum Gene Ther. 2004;15(12):1243‐1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Yin D, Zhou C, Kusaka I, et al. Inhibition of apoptosis by hyperbaric oxygen in a rat focal cerebral ischemic model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23(7):855‐864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bennett MH, Trytko B, Jonker B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD004609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Borlongan CV. Cell therapy for stroke: remaining issues to address before embarking on clinical trials. Stroke. 2009;40(3 Suppl):S146‐148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Xing P, Ma K, Li L, Wang D, Hu G, Long W. The protection effect and mechanism of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in rat brain with traumatic injury. Acta Cir Bras. 2018;33(4):341‐353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Saporta S, Cameron DF, Borlongan CV, Sanberg PR. Survival of rat and porcine Sertoli cell transplants in the rat striatum without cyclosporine‐A immunosuppression. Exp Neurol. 1997;146(2):299‐304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]