Abstract
Background and Objectives:
Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis is an extremely frequent ophthalmological disease caused by various serological subtypes of human adenovirus (HAdV) worldwide. Adenoviruses serotypes 8, 11, 19, 37 frequently cause epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC). This study was conducted to evaluate the frequency of adenovirus serotypes in patients with EKC in Ahvaz, Iran.
Materials and Methods:
Eighty-eight ocular swabs were collected from patients with EKC. The specimens were analyzed for detection of adenovirus by standard PCR. The PCR products were further sequenced and analyzed to determine the serotypes.
Results:
The study population consisted of 49/88 (55.7%) males and 39/88 (44.3%) females. Among them 25 (51.02%) males and 22 (56.41%) females were positive for HAdV serotype 8 (p= 0.488). Overall forty-seven (53.4%) samples were positive for AdV serotype 8 while forty-one patients (46.59%) were negative for the adenovirus serotypes.
Conclusion:
The results of this study revealed predominanance of HAdV 8 with high prevalence of 53.4% among patients with Keratoconjunctivitis. Forty-one patients (46.59%) were negative for adenovirus. Still, the role for other related viruses such as enteroviruses need to be investigated in patients with EKC.
Keywords: Human adenovirus, Polymerase chain reaction, Keratoconjunctivitis, Serotype
INTRODUCTION
Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) is a serious public health problem, caused by certain adenoviruses serotypes which have been reported in the different regions of the world (1, 2). EKC is a self-limited infection, the incubation period varies from 4 to 24 days. EKC is characterized by the involvement of the entire surface eye, including both the conjunctiva and corneal epithelia and hazy vision (3). Eye irritation, red eye, foreign body sensation, watery discharge and photophobia are the most common symptoms. The ocular signs are predominantly bulbar conjunctiva redness, blepharedema, epiphora, chemosis, follicular reaction, subconjunctival hemorrhage and membrane or pseudomembrane formation. It may lead to unilateral or bilateral follicular conjunctivitis followed by corneal subepithelial infiltrate, blurry vision and is associated with significant morbidity (4). EKC is highly contagious, and out-breaks have been reported in schools, military bases, and hospital wards. The modes of transmission are mainly through hand to eye contact, ocular secretions, respiratory droplets, and contact with ophthalmic care providers and medical instruments (1–3).
Human adenoviruses (HADVs) are non-envelope, icosahedral, double-stranded DNA viruses and are classified within the family Adenoviridae, genus Mastadenovirus, and are further divided into seven species (A–G) (5, 6).
Adenoviruses can cause an array of clinical diseases, including conjunctivitis, respiratory disease, hemorrhagic cystitis and gastroenteritis (7).
EKC and pharyngoconjunctival fever are the most common adenoviral ocular diseases (4, 8). Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis is frequent ophthalmological disease and account for 15% to 70% of all conjunctivitis cases worldwide (3, 9).
Several adenoviruses including HAdV-8, HAdV-19 and HADV-37 (in HAdV-D) are responsible from severe and contagious EKC which can be related to a nosocomial infection or community acquired (4, 10–12).
Laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis can be useful tool for physicians in rapidly initiating suitable hygienic measures and determining the epidemiological significance of the infection. Diagnosis is clinically based on clinical features, and history symptoms. However, other causes of conjunctivitis such as chlamydial infection and herpes simplex virus or varicella zoster virus need to be excluded (9).
The hypervariable of the hexon region of HAdV is used for determination of adenovirus serotyping (4, 13, 14).
Detection of adenoviral DNA in conjunctival specimen is carried out by PCR which is reliable assay and commonly used in many laboratories across the world (4).
Adenovirus serotyping can be performed by sequencing or Restriction Fragment Lenght Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Identification of the adenovirus serotype involved in EKC is required to understand the geographical distribution of the adenovirus and to perfect the knowledge on the relation between a specific genotype and clinical features (4, 13). There is limited data regarding adenoviral kerato-conjunctivitis in Iran (9). The prevalence of EKC have been reported in different regions of the world (4, 13).
This study was aimed to detect and determine the adenovirus serotypes among the patients with EKC referred to Department of Ophtalmology, Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahvaz city. Ahvaz city is the capital of Khuzestan province, located in the south-west region of the Iran.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present work is a descriptive study, and the selection of patients were carried out, based on an episode of EKC, who referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital Ahvaz city, Iran, during November to December 2013.
The informed consent was obtained from each patient. This study with the registration number IR.AJUMS.REC.1394.126 was approved by an Ethic Committee of the Deputy Research and Affairs Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz, Iran.
All the patients had clinical signs and symptomatic of acute keratoconjunctivitis, with the signs of sudden redness, discomfort, pain, tearing, follicular reaction, and tender preauricular lymph node enlargement.
Totally, 88 symptomatic patients were considered for this study. The samples were collected from the lower palpebral conjunctiva using sterile Dacron swab, which was subsequently introduced in a transport media (DMEM) supplemented with antibiotics and antifungal (15). Specimens were stored at −70°C for further processing.
DNA extraction.
High pure viral nucleic acid kit (Roche, Germany) was used for the extraction of DNA according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Polymerase chain reaction.
PCR is the “gold standard” for diagnosing viral conjunctivitis. Studies indicated that PCR is more sensitive for detecting adenoviruses than other virological methods such as viral culture, antigen detection and serological tests (5, 16).
To perform the test, first GAPDH primers were used as an internal control and to evaluate the quality of extracted DNA. The conserved region within the hexon gene were used in the PCR assay. PCR was performed in 25 μl PCR reaction mixture, containing 7 μl of extracted DNA, 2.5 μl PCR buffer 10×, 0.75 μl MgCl, 0.5 μl dNTP 10 mM, 1U of Taq DNA Polymerase, 0.5 μM of each primers of forward, hex1deg (5′-GCC SCA RTG GKC WTA CAT GCA CAT C-3′) and revers, hex2deg (5′-CAG CAC SCC ICG RAT GTC AAA-3′) (17).
The PCR reaction mixture was subjected to thermocycler (Techne TC-5000, UK) and programmed with following condition one cycle: 94°C for 5 min: and 35 cycles: 94°C for 1 min; 56°C for 1 min; 72°C for 1 min, final extension 72°C for 10 min.
Gel electrophoresis.
The final PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel, stained with safe stain and visualized under ultraviolet transilluminator. The expected size of the PCR products for the HAdV was 301 bp (Fig. 2). DEPC water was used as a negative control and adenovirus 40 and 41 used as a positive control.
Sequencing.
To confirm the positive samples and determine the HAdV serotypes, randomly six positive samples for partial hexan were sequenced. The sequences were blast using available databases. A phylogenic tree was constructed with Neighbor joining method using the partial nucleotide sequences for partial hexon of detected HAdV. Reference sequences were retrieved from GenBank using their accession numbers.
Statistical analysis.
Data were statistically defined in terms of median and range or mean and standard deviation (± SD), frequencies. For comparing categorical data, Chi square test was done. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were done using SPSS version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
RESULTS
The study population consisted of 39 (44.3%) females and 49 (55.7%) males. The age of the youngest and the oldest patients were 1 and 81, respectively, with the mean average age of 36.15±18.64 (Fig. 1). From the total of 88 specimens tested, 47 (53.4%) were positive in PCR test. Among them 25 (51.02%) were males and 22 (56.41%) females showed positive for HAdV and 41 (46.59%) individuals including 24 (58.5%) males and 17 (41.5%) females were negative for HAdV (P =0.615). Table 1 shows the distribution of adenovirus infection among the age groups of patients. As demonstrated in Table 1, the age group of 30–39 years shows the highest prevalence (17.05%) adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis and the lowest were 2 positive cases in age group of <10 years. However, there was no statistically significant association between the age and adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis (P=0.732).
Table 1.
Age group | Positive | Negative | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | % | No | % | ||
< 10 | 3 | 3.4% | 2 | 2.27%* | |
10–19 | 3 | 3.4% | 4 | 4.54% | |
20–29 | 12 | 13.63% | 11 | 12.5% | |
30–39 | 15 | (17.04%) | 14 | 15.9%* | 0.732 |
40–49 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.13% | |
50–59 | 9 | 10.22% | 4 | 4.54% | |
60–69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
>70 | 5 | 5.68% | 5 | 5.68% | |
Total | 47 | 53.4% | 41 | 46.59% |
The results of sequencing for 6 positive samples revealed that HAdV-8 was the only dominant serotype.
The obtained sequences were blasted using National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The results of blasting showed that all 6 isolated strains had nucleotide identity score of 98% with the standard references of Human Adenovirus D8 retrieved from GenBank.
Results of Phylogenetic tree.
The results of Maximum likelihood tree revealed that the sequences of the all the 6 isolated HAdV8 from patients with acute EKC had very closed nucleotide homology with those isolated HAdV serotype 8 in the different regions of the world. The standard references with their accession number was retrieved from GenBank (Fig. 3).
DISCUSSION
Epidemic viral conjunctivitis is a very contagious disease that is run into year-round. Adenoviruses and enteroviruses are the main causative agents of EKC (18). Adenovirus represents 15% to 70% of all cases of infectious conjunctivitis in different regions of the world (19). It is the commonest cause of viral conjunctivitis and EKC in ophthalmic clinics in several societies, especially in East and Southeast Asia. Subgroup D adenoviruses including type 8, 19, 37 and adenovirus type 11 (Subgroup B) are the predominant viruses isolated in each endemic outbreak in a different region of the world (20–23).
Three new human adenovirus types that cause EKC were recently detected and named HAdV-53, HAdV-54, and HAdV-56 (20, 22–26). HAdV-56 is a new recombinant type isolated from epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) patients in the city of Dalian, China (22). In the present study, it was demonstrated that outbreak of EKC was caused by human adenovirus type 8 and it was the only predominant serotype in the patients with EKC in Ahvaz city, Iran. In the current study, 53.4% of the patients with EKC showed positive for HAdV serotype 8 which among them 51.02% were males and 56.41% females (p=0.488).
In blasting process we observed the isolated HAdVs serotype 8 in Ahvaz city had 97% nucleotide identity with HAdV-54, 8 isolated in Japan (23, 25). The Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree shows the nucleotide homology with the isolated HAdV 8 and the isolates HAdV serotypes 54 in Japan (27).
However, limited data have been reported on the prevalence of EKC in Iran. Sohrabi, et al., conducted a study in Tehran (2014) and described 150 samples of patients with acute conjunctivitis; 22 (14.6%) and 5 (3.3%) cases were considered positive for adenovirus and HSV-1 DNA, respectively (19). Besides, Pinto et al. showed an incidence of 59% for adenovirus in viral conjunctivitis in Brazil which is in agreement with our finding (16). Yagci et al. in Turkey report an incidence of 26.5% for adenoviral conjunctivitis by PCR method (28). The difference probably indicates hygienic and geographical discrepancies between different communities.
Jin et al. conducted a study to investigate the epidemiology of adenoviral conjunctivitis in Hanoi, Vietnam and reported predominantly high prevalence of Ad8 (29). Aoki et al. reported 124/196 (63.26%) of the patients with EKC showed positive for the Ad8 (30). Adenoviral conjunctivitis are largely caused by adenovirus serotypes 3, 4, 8, 11, 19, 22 and 37 (31–33). Ishii et al. compared the clinical and viral data of adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis in Sapporo (Japan), Koahsiung (Taiwan), and Busan (Korea), and found that the most frequently detected agent was Ad 8 (57%), followed by EV 70 (12%), Ad 3 (9%) and Ad 19 (7%). They concluded that Ad8 as the major serotypes in these cities (34).
The results of blasting showed that all the 6 isolated strains had nucleotide identity score of 98% with the standard references of human adenovirus D8 retrieved from GenBank. The Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the nucleotide sequences of the all the 6 isolated HAdV8 from patients with acute EKC showed high degree of Homology with those isolated HAdV serotypes 8 from different regions of the world.
HAdVs that cause EKC are spread person-to-person or by fomites; no vaccines or effective antiviral treatments are available and are resistant to desiccation and certain common surface disinfectants (35, 36).
This study points up the outbreak of HAdV in Ahvaz city, however, effective control measures should be carried out by the health care settings to prevent transmission within clinical settings and the community. Eye care providers should control protocols about EKC, and other infection risks, as recommended by CDC (35). The application of toolkit, patient education, wiping instruments with alcohol pads after each patient contact, daily cleaning of commonly touched surfaces by effective agents against HAdV contamination and a health advisory to providers will reduce HAdV transmission (36).
In conclusion, this study described high prevalence of HAdV among the patients with conjunctivitis, considering that AdV8 was the predominant serotype circulating in Ahvaz city Also, this study is the first report of HAdV outbreak in Iran. Although the role of other viruses such as enteroviruses particularly Coxsakie A24 and Enterovirus 70 are required to be investigated in patients with EKC (37, 38).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was done by Kolsom Shafiei (MSc,Virology) as a research project with registration number 94124, financially supported by Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Health Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jhanji V, Chan TC, Li EY, Agarwal K, Vajpayee RB. Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis. Surv Ophthalmol 2015;60:435–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stefkovicova M, Vicianova V, Sokolik J, Madar R. Causes and control measures in hospital outbreaks of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. Indoor Built Environ 2006;15:111–115. [Google Scholar]
- 3.González-López J, Morcillo-Laiz R, Muñoz-Negrete F. Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis: an update. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2013;88:108–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Erdin BN, Pas SD, Durak İ, Schutten M, Sayıner AA. A 5-year study of adenoviruses causing conjunctivitis in Izmir, Turkey. J Med Virol 2015;87:472–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ghebremedhin B. Human adenovirus: Viral pathogen with increasing importance. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2014;4:26–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lu X, Erdman D. Molecular typing of human adenoviruses by PCR and sequencing of a partial region of the hexon gene. Arch Virol 2006;151:1587–1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Radkea Jay R, Cook James L. a human adenovirus infections: update and consideration of mechanisms of viral persistence Curr Opin Infect Dis 2018. ; 31: 251–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Okada M, Ogawa T, Kubonoya H, Yoshizumi H, Shinozaki K. Detection and sequence-based typing of human adenoviruses using sensitive universal primer sets for the hexon gene. Arch Virol 2007;152:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shamsi-Shahrabadi M, Mousavi E, Monavari S, Ataei-Pirkooh A, Bakhtiari P. Incidence of adenoviral conjunctivitis in patients referred to the Iran University affiliated hospital. Iran J Virol 2009; 3:7–11. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takashi U, Hironori M, Tomohiro U, Tomoko TK, Yusuke S, Tsuguto F, et al. Clinical and virological analysis of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis caused by adenovirus type 54 in a regional ophthalmic clinic in Kyushu, Japan. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:511–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Majeed A, Naeem Z, Khan DA, Ayaz A. Epidemic adenoviral conjunctivitis report of an outbreak in a military garison and recommendations for its management and prevention. J Pak Med Assoc 2005;55:273–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Trinavarat A, Atchaneeyasakul L-o. Treatment of epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis with 2% povidone–iodine: a pilot study. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2012;28:53–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Frantzidou F, Pavlitou A, Mataftsi A, Dumaidi K, Georgiadis N. Molecular epidemiology of adenovirus strains isolated from patients with ocular disease in the area of Thessaloniki, Greece (1998–2002). J Med Virol 2005;75:440–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hongling Q, Xiao L, Xingui T, Zhichao Z, Ke X, Haitao L, et al. Serotype-specific neutralizing antibody epitopes of human adenovirus type 3 (HAdV-3) and HAdV-7 reside in multiple hexon hypervariable regions. J Virol 2012;86: 7964–7975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Akçay E, Çarhan A, Hondur G, Tufan ZK, Duru N, Kılıç S, et al. Molecular identification of viral agents associated with acute conjunctivitis: a prospective controlled study. Braz J Infect Dis 2017;21:391–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pinto RDP, Lira RPC, Arieta CEL, Castro RSd, Bonon SHA. The prevalence of adenoviral conjunctivitis at the clinical hospital of the state university of campinas. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015;70:748–750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Allard A, Albinsson B, Wadell G. Rapid typing of human adenoviruses by a general PCR combined with restriction endonuclease analysis. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:498–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee Y-C, Chen N, Huang I-T, Yang H-H, Huang C-T, Chen L-K, et al. Human adenovirus type 8 epidemic keratoconjunctivitis with large corneal epithelial full-layer detachment: an endemic outbreak with un-common manifestations. Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:953–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sohrabi M, Goodarzi Z, Saberfar E, Lashini H. The prevalence of viral conjunctivitis in patients who referred to eye specialist hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Ophthalmol 2014;26:29–32. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Akiyoshi K, Suga T, Fukui K, Taniguchi K, Okabe N, Fujimoto T. Outbreak of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis caused by adenovirus type 54 in a nursery school in Kobe City, Japan in 2008. Jpn J Infect Dis 2011;64:353–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Goudarzi H, Rostami S, Eslami G, Rahbar AS, Miraghasi F, Besharat M, et al. Frequency of adenoviral conjunctivitis by cell culture and PCR method in two referral university hospitals in Tehran. Iran J Clin Infect Dis 2006;1:127–129. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huang G, Yao W, Yu W, Mao L, Sun H, Yao W, et al. Outbreak of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis caused by human adenovirus type 56, China, 2012. PLoS One 2014;9(10):e110781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kaneko H, Suzutani T, Aoki K, Kitaichi N, Ishida S, Ishiko H, et al. Epidemiological and virological features of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis due to new human adenovirus type 54 in Japan. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:32–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ishiko H, Shimada Y, Konno T, Hayashi A, Ohguchi T, Tagawa Y, et al. Novel human adenovirus causing nosocomial epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2002–2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaneko H, Ishiko H, Ohguchi T, Tagawa Y, Aoki K, Suzutani T, et al. Nucleotide sequence variation in the hexon gene of human adenovirus type 8 and 37 strains from epidemic keratoconjunctivitis patients in Japan. J Gen Virol 2009;90:2260–2265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nakamura M, Hirano E, Kowada K, Ishiguro F, Yamagishi Z, Adhikary AK, et al. Surveillance of adeno-virus D in patients with epidemic keratoconjunctivitis from Fukui Prefecture, Japan, 1995–2010. J Med Virol 2012;84:81–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adeno-virus-associated epidemic keratoconjunctivitis out-breaks - four states, 2008–2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:637–641. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yağci R, Akçali A, Yağci S, Konno T, Ishiko H, Duman S, et al. Molecular identification of adenoviral conjunctivitis in Turkey. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010;20:669–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jin X-H, Ishiko H, Ha NT, Ohguchi T, Akanuma M, Aoki K, et al. Molecular epidemiology of adenoviral conjunctivitis in Hanoi, Vietnam. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:1064–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aoki K, Kato M, Ohtsuka H, Ishii K, Nakazono N, Sawada H. Clinical and aetiological study of adenoviral conjunctivitis, with special reference to adenovirus types 4 and 19 infections. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:776–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ariga T, Shimada Y, Ohgami K, Tagawa Y, Ishiko H, Aoki K, et al. New genome type of adenovirus serotype 4 caused nosocomial infections associated with epidemic conjunctivitis in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:3644–3648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saitoh-Inagawa W, Oshima A, Aoki K, Itoh N, Isobe K, Uchio E, et al. Rapid diagnosis of adenoviral conjunctivitis by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:2113–2116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tabbara KF, Omar N, Hammouda E, Akanuma M, Ohguchi T, Ariga T, et al. Molecular epidemiology of adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis in Saudi Arabia. Mol Vis 2010; 16: 2132–2136. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ishii K, Nakazono N, Fujinaga K, Fujii S, Kato M, Ohtsuka H, et al. Comparative studies on aetiology and epidemiology of viral conjunctivitis in three countries of East Asia—Japan, Taiwan and South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 1987;16:98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Massey J, Henry R, Minnich L, Lamson DM, St George K. Notes from the Field. Health care–associated out-break of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis — west Virginia, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:382–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rutala WA, Peacock JE, Gergen MF, Sobsey MD, Weber DJ. Efficacy of hospital germicides against adenovirus 8, a common cause of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis in health care facilities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:1419–1424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shukla D, Kumar A, Srivastava S, Dhole TN. Molecular identification and phylogenetic study of coxsackievirus A24 variant isolated from an outbreak of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis in India in 2010. Arch Virol 2013;158:679–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lévêque N, Huguet P, Norder H, Chomel JJ. Enteroviruses responsible for acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis. Med Mal Infect 2010;40:212–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]