Chlamydiales species are obligate intracellular bacteria and important human pathogens that have a minimal division machinery lacking the proteins that are essential for bacterial division in other species, such as FtsZ. Chlamydial division requires synthesis of peptidoglycan, which forms a ring at the division septum and is rapidly turned over. However, little is known of peptidoglycan degradation, because many peptidoglycan-degrading enzymes are not encoded by chlamydial genomes. Here we show that an homologue of SpoIID, a peptidoglycan-degrading enzyme involved in sporulation of bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, is expressed in Chlamydiales, localizes at the division septum, and degrades peptidoglycan in vitro, indicating that SpoIID is not only involved in sporulation but also likely implicated in division of some bacteria.
KEYWORDS: Chlamydiales, Waddlia chondrophila, cell division, peptidoglycan, sporulation
ABSTRACT
Chlamydiales species are obligate intracellular bacteria lacking a classical peptidoglycan sacculus but relying on peptidoglycan synthesis for cytokinesis. While septal peptidoglycan biosynthesis seems to be regulated by MreB actin and its membrane anchor RodZ rather than FtsZ tubulin in Chlamydiales, the mechanism of peptidoglycan remodeling is poorly understood. An amidase conserved in Chlamydiales is able to cleave peptide stems in peptidoglycan, but it is not clear how peptidoglycan glycan strands are cleaved since no classical lytic transglycosylase is encoded in chlamydial genomes. However, a protein containing a SpoIID domain, known to possess transglycosylase activity in Bacillus subtilis, is conserved in Chlamydiales. We show here that the SpoIID homologue of the Chlamydia-related pathogen Waddlia chondrophila is a septal peptidoglycan-binding protein. Moreover, we demonstrate that SpoIID acts as a lytic transglycosylase on peptidoglycan and as a muramidase on denuded glycan strands in vitro. As SpoIID-like proteins are widespread in nonsporulating bacteria, SpoIID might commonly be a septal peptidoglycan remodeling protein in bacteria, including obligate intracellular pathogens, and thus might represent a promising drug target.
INTRODUCTION
Cell division is an essential step for proliferation of all bacteria that is executed after genome replication. Typically, the assembly of the division septum is organized by the bacterial tubulin homolog FtsZ, which polymerizes at the division septum and recruits important proteins involved in the remodeling of the peptidoglycan (PG), subsequently directing the invagination of the envelope (1). PG is a polymer of glycan strands composed of β-1,4-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc) disaccharide units that are cross-linked by peptide bridges. The composition of the peptide bridges can differ among different species but typically contains both d- and l-amino acids. PG synthesis begins in the cytoplasm and at the cytoplasmic membrane to form lipid II. Once lipid II is flipped to the extracytosolic space, the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and/or the proteins of the shape, elongation, division and sporulation (SEDS) family execute the transglycosylation and transpeptidation reactions to generate glycan strands and peptide cross-links, respectively (2–4). PBP activity is required at the division septum and is inhibited by penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics that mimic parts of lipid II. Interestingly, few bacteria can remodel their PG at the division septum in the absence of FtsZ. Among these bacteria are Chlamydiales species (2).
Chlamydiales are Gram-negative (diderm) obligate intracellular bacteria, including many important human pathogens such as Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae, which are classified in the Chlamydiaceae family. All members of the Chlamydiales order that are not part of the Chlamydiaceae family are commonly referred to as Chlamydia-related bacteria. They have been much less extensively studied but include putative emergent pathogens such as Waddlia chondrophila (for reviews, see references 2 and 5). Chlamydiales underwent a drastic genome reduction apparently driven by the adaptation of these bacteria to an intracellular parasitic lifestyle (6–8) but still retained all minimal determinants required for cell division and to synthesize and remodel PG. They are thus excellent models to elucidate the requirements for a minimal bacterial division machine. PG could be detected as a ring in dividing Chlamydiaceae (9, 10) and as a complete sacculus in some Chlamydia-related bacteria (11). The very small amount of PG detected in W. chondrophila argues against the present of a complete septum in this species (12), but corroborating evidence is lacking thus far. As Chlamydiae lack FtsZ, they appear to rely on the actin homologue MreB and its membrane anchor RodZ (13, 14) to regulate PG synthesis and remodeling in time and space (9, 10). However, the mechanism and the regulation of PG remodeling at the division septum in Chlamydiae are not fully understood. Amidases able to cleave peptide stems at the amide bond of MurNAc were described in Waddlia chondrophila and Chlamydia pneumoniae (15, 16), but chlamydial genomes do not code for homologues of classical lytic transglycosylases (17), raising the issue of how the glycan strand is cleaved. Interestingly, a gene coding for a protein containing a SpoIID-domain is conserved among the members of Chlamydiales. Since a SpoIID-domain containing protein of Bacillus subtilis was demonstrated previously to be a lytic transglycosylase involved in sporulation (18, 19), this activity might be conserved in Chlamydiales.
In this study, we showed that a protein containing a SpoIID domain (here called SpoIIDWch [for “W. chondrophila SpoIID”] for clarity) is able to bind PG. SpoIIDWch is septally localized and was shown to be capable of being immunoprecipitated together with RodZ. Furthermore, chlamydial SpoIID, similarly to its B. subtilis homologue, binds PG in vitro and digests denuded glycan chains (i.e., those with no peptide stem attached). However, in contrast to B. subtilis SpoIID (SpoIIDBsu), SpoIIDWch seems to act as a lytic transglycosylase on Gram-negative PG in vitro and as a muramidase on denuded glycan chains, indicating that it might possess dual activities, depending on its substrate. Note that proteins containing a SpoIID domain are present in a large variety of both sporulating bacteria and nonsporulating bacteria, indicating that this domain may fulfill an ancestral role in PG remodeling and cell division, independently of sporulation and before branching of cyanobacteria, firmicutes, and proteobacteria, as already suggested previously by Morlot et al. (18).
RESULTS
Waddlia chondrophila peptidoglycan can be detected in small amounts.
In an earlier study, we showed that extracts from W. chondrophila were able to activate the Nod pathway of a reporter mammalian cell (12). However, the low concentrations of PG obtained were not sufficient to characterize its structure by ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and subsequent mass spectrometry (MS). To improve PG extraction, we used 240 flasks (25 cm2) of W. chondrophila-infected Vero cells. Sufficient amounts of PG could be obtained and analyzed by the use of advanced and highly sensitive UPLC-QTOF-MS (UPLC-quadrupole time of flight-MS) (Fig. 1). The chemical structures corresponding to the W. chondrophila PG peaks were determined using their MS and tandem MS (MS/MS) fragmentation patterns (Table 1; see also Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). These peaks (numbered 1 to 7) were assigned to molecular weights corresponding to PG subunits. For example, peak 1 corresponds to a PG monomer composed of a disaccharide tetrapeptide, GlcNAc-MurNAc-l-Ala-d-Glu-mDAP-d-Ala (M4; Fig. S1A), and peak 7 corresponds to two disaccharides linked together by eight amino acids (aa) (D44; Fig. S1A). All seven peaks detected and analyzed (Table 1; see also Fig. S1A) correspond to PG subunits similar to those found in classical Gram-negative PG (e.g., Escherichia coli) and in C. trachomatis PG (20). However, the number of ld cross-links is apparently higher in W. chondrophila than in model Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli (Fig. 1, peaks 2 and 6).
TABLE 1.
Peak no. |
Retention time (min) |
% content |
[M + H]+
(calculated) |
[M + H]+
(observed) |
Mass difference (cal/obs)a |
Muropeptide |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4.94 | 23.31 | 942.4147 | M4b | ||
2 | 6.24 | 5.82 | 1,780.7591 | 1,780.7558 | 0.0033 | D33G |
3 | 6.37 | 4.88 | 1,723.7376 | 1,723.7349 | 0.0027 | D33 |
4 | 6.53 | 3.07 | 1,851.7962 | 1,851.8025 | 0.0063 | D43G/D34G |
5 | 6.65 | 3.6 | 1,794.7747 | 1,794.7693 | 0.0054 | D43 |
6 | 6.81 | 13.36 | 1,794.7747 | 1,794.7741 | 0.0006 | D34 |
7 | 7.11 | 25.79 | 1,865.8118 | 1,865.7996 | 0.0122 | D44 |
cal/obs, calculated/observed.
The identity of M4 was established by retention time matching with an E. coli PG reference (MS previously characterized) under the same separation conditions.
Proteins binding to peptidoglycan and interacting with division machinery might be important actors in chlamydial division.
Proteins binding to chlamydial PG might have an important role in the PG biosynthesis/degradation cycle. We recently used mass spectrometry to identify the proteins of W. chondrophila that bind to PG (12). We also recently showed that RodZ, a regulator of the actin homologue MreB, is an inner membrane protein that localizes at the division septum at early stages of W. chondrophila division (14). We thus hypothesized that proteins interacting both with PG and with the divisome would be candidate regulators of chlamydial division that might coordinate PG biosynthesis/remodeling/degradation at the division septum and divisome formation. Since we identified RodZ as an early divisome component (14), we performed a coimmunoprecipitation with anti-RodZ antibodies on infected and noninfected cell lysates, followed by MS-based proteomics, in order to identify uncharacterized divisome components. Candidates showing enrichment in infected samples compared to the noninfected control, with the exclusion of the usual contaminants such as ribosomal proteins, were selected (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). By comparing this list with a list of proteins of W. chondrophila binding to PG, we identified Wcw_0967 (WCW_RS04685) as a potential candidate interacting with both RodZ and PG.
The wcw_0967 gene is conserved among Chlamydiales, encoding a protein with an N-terminal signal sequence that might be cleaved (Fig. 2A; see also Fig. S1B). Moreover, wcw_0967 contains a domain found in the stage II sporulation protein (SpoIID) of Bacillus subtilis. We thus renamed Wcw_0967 “SpoIIDWch.” SpoIID of B. subtilis (SpoIIDBsu) was shown to bind PG and drive membrane movement during B. subtilis sporulation, simultaneously degrading PG via its lytic transglycosylase activity (18). We were thus interested to investigate the potential role of the chlamydial homologues of SpoIID in the division process. We hypothesized that chlamydial SpoIID might link together PG biosynthesis/remodeling and divisome formation through interactions with the divisome (either directly with RodZ or through other divisome components) and PG (Fig. 2B). Moreover, chlamydial SpoIIDs might have a conserved lytic transglycosylase activity and might thus directly degrade septal PG.
SpoIIDWch is expressed early during the chlamydial developmental cycle and partially localizes to the division septum.
In order to investigate the potential role of SpoIIDWch in division, we first measured the expression profile of spoIIDWch during infection of mammalian cells by W. chondrophila. We were able to detect mRNA by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) at as early a time as 4 h postinfection (p.i.), with a peak 8 h p.i. (Fig. 3A). This expression pattern is consistent with a role of SpoIIDWch in division, since it shows expression levels similar to what was observed previously for genes coding for members of the chlamydial divisome such as mreB, rodZ, and pal (12, 14). We then raised antibodies against SpoIIDWch that specifically recognized a protein of the predicted size in samples taken at 32 and 48 h p.i. by immunoblotting (Fig. S4D). In order to normalize the quantity of protein and mRNA to the number of bacteria, quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting 16S DNA (Fig. S4A), qRT-PCRs targeting 16S RNA (Fig. S4B) and SpoIIDWch mRNA (Fig. S4C), and Western blotting were performed in parallel. qPCR was used to load protein samples with equivalent numbers of bacteria and to detect SpoIIDWch by Western blotting (Fig. 3B). This was possible only from 24 h p.i. on, since the number of bacteria was too low at earlier time points. The quantity of proteins was found to be decreasing at late time points, indicating that SpoIIDWch was present mainly in intracellular replicating reticulate bodies (RBs). SpoIIDWch could be detected in RBs at both 24 and 48 h p.i. (Fig. 3C, arrowheads), but elementary bodies (EBs), the extracellular infective forms, which are recognizable by their strong DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining due to DNA condensation, were not labeled by these antibodies (Fig. 3C, arrows). We cannot exclude the possibility that the lack of detection of SpoIIDWch by immunofluorescence in EBs was due to poor permeability of EBs. However, the low level of detection of SpoIIDWch in purified EBs by immunoblotting (Fig. 3B) is a good indication that this protein is not strongly present in EBs, since many proteins were able to be detected earlier in EBs by Western blotting as shown previously (21). Interestingly, the antigen could be detected by immunofluorescence at as early a time point as 8 h p.i. (Fig. 3D), which is consistent with the early RNA expression (Fig. 3A).
In a further step, the subcellular localization of SpoIID in W. chondrophila was investigated using higher-resolution fluorescence microscopy. We observed partial septal localization of SpoIIDWch in dividing RBs at 24 h p.i. (Fig. 3D, arrows). This septal localization was confirmed by quantification of fluorescence signal (Fig. S2A). However, we observed accumulation of SpoIIDWch not only at the division septum but also in some foci. Treatment of W. chondrophila with penicillin induces aberrant bodies in which septation is stalled and divisome components such as RodZ are accumulating at the septum (14). SpoIIDWch localization at the division septum was not affected by penicillin treatment (Fig. 3D, arrows; see also Fig. S2B). Moreover, the septal localization of SpoIIDWch was dependent on PG biosynthesis, since treatment with phosphomycin, which inhibits a lipid II biosynthesis step in the cytoplasm, completely dispersed SpoIIDWch from midcell (Fig. 3D; see also Fig. S3). Thus, SpoIID requires PG precursors to localize to the septum, similarly to what was observed previously for RodZ (14).
SpoIIDWch binds to PG in vitro.
The B. subtilis homologue of SpoIID was shown to bind to PG and to digest naked glycan strands of PG (18). We thus decided to investigate if these properties are conserved for SpoIIDWch. We could purify soluble versions of SpoIIDWch and SpoIIDBsu that lacked their N-terminal signal peptides (Fig. 4A). Fittingly, after coincubation of SpoIIDWch or SpoIIDBsu with purified PG sacculi from the Gram-negative E. coli, we observed cosedimentation of the proteins with the PG, indicating that both SpoIIDWch and SpoIIDBsu are indeed able to directly bind PG (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, SpoIIDWch was unable to bind PG from the Gram-positive bacterium B. subtilis (Fig. 4B). Another W. chondrophila protein, NlpD, which was shown to directly bind to PG (15), also bound only to E. coli PG. In contrast, the B. subtilis amidase CwlH, which was shown previously to produce naked glycan chains (22), was able to bind to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative sacculi (Fig. 4B).
SpoIIDWch degrades naked glycan strands in vitro.
We then investigated the activity of SpoIIDWch on PG in vitro using a PG release assay. This assay helps efforts designed to estimate the activity of a protein on PG by quantifying the release of a dye from PG stained with Remazol brilliant blue (RBB) (18). Incubation of labeled PG with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a control protein did not result in any detectable release of dye in the supernatant. Interestingly, addition of SpoIIDWch alone did not induce any visible dye release in this assay, similarly to what was observed for SpoIIDBsu (18) (Fig. 4C). Indeed, SpoIIDBsu was shown to digest only naked glycan strands of PG, after removal of the stem peptides (18). To determine whether SpoIIDWch can only digest naked glycan strands, we used the B. subtilis amidase CwlHBsu in an assay similar to what was performed with SpoIIDBsu (22). RBB-labeled E. coli PG was thus incubated simultaneously with CwlHBsu and SpoIIDWch during 30 min. This coincubation caused a significant 1.5× increase in dye release compared to CwlHBsu alone (Fig. 4C). This effect was specific to SpoIID and was not mimicked by the addition of an unrelated protein, since coincubation of PG with BSA and CwlHBsu did not cause an increase in the level of dye release. Interestingly, SpoIIDWch showed a level of activity similar to that seen with SpoIIDBsu (Fig. 4C), consistent with the notion that SpoIIDWch can digest naked glycan strands (Fig. 4D). Interestingly, AmiAWch, a chlamydial amidase (15, 16), showed activity with respect to PG that was similar to that seen with CwlHBsu and allowed digestion of PG by SpoIIDWch (Fig. 4D), indicating that SpoIIDWch might have access to naked PG in vivo.
SpoIIDWch acts as a lytic transglycosylase on PG in vitro.
To further investigate the activity of SpoIIDWch on PG, purified SpoIIDWch was incubated overnight at 37°C with PG of different bacterial species. Digested PG was then analyzed by UPLC-QTOF. Interestingly, SpoIIDWch showed low levels of activity on PG of E. coli, Vibrio cholerae, and Caulobacter crescentus, causing the release of low levels of anhydro moieties (see M4N [GlcNAc-anhydroMurNAc-l-Ala-d-Glu-mDAP-d-Ala] and M5N [GlcNac-anhydroMurNac with 5 amino acids] data in Fig. 5A; see also M4N data in Fig. S4E and F). Interestingly, SpoIIDWch caused release of M5N only from PG of C. crescentus, indicating that this PG might have slight structural changes that could expose these moieties to the enzyme. A similar level of activity was observed when SpoIIDBsu was incubated with PG of C. crescentus (Fig. 5A). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that SpoIIDWch has dual activities on PG of E. coli and V. cholerae, since we noted the appearance of a secondary peak, whose structure cannot be determined at this point (labeled with question marks in Fig. S4E and F). Taken together, these results indicate that SpoIIDWch has low but detectable lytic transglycosylase activity on PG sacculi, since overnight incubation was required for detectable release. This activity was confirmed by incubation of SpoIIDWch with PG from V. cholerae pretreated with ShyA, a d,d-endopeptidase of V. cholerae (23). Under these conditions, SpoIIDWch was able to release the GlcNAc-anhydroMurNAc-l-Ala-d-Glu-mDAP-d-Ala (M4N) along with other anhydro-muropeptides (anhydro analogues; 1.52 and 1.57 min of retention time) (Fig. 5B; see also Fig. S4G and H). Similar peaks were detected when SpoIIDBsu was used (Fig. 5B). Finally, incubation of SpoIIDWch with denuded glycan chains produced by digestion of PG from V. cholerae with the amidase AmpDh3 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa induced the release of a majority of nonanhydro moieties, similarly to treatment with muramidase, which cleaves between MurNAc and GlcNAc [(NAG-NAM)2; Fig. 5C]. This is in contrast with the activity of SpoIIDBsu, which did not cause accumulation of nonanhydro moieties (Fig. 5C). Taken together, these results indicate that SpoIIDWch might be a bifunctional lytic transglycosylase/muramidase and that its activity, which is different from that of SpoIIDBsu, might depend on its substrate.
An aspartic residue at position 48 is important for SpoIIDWch activity.
A glutamic acid residue (E88) was shown to be essential for the activity of SpoIIDBsu (18). We wondered if a similar residue would be conserved and essential for the activity of SpoIIDWch. We selected conserved glutamic acid and/or aspartic acid residues (since the two have similar properties) in SpoIID of W. chondrophila, C. trachomatis, and C. pneumoniae (Fig. 2A, red stars). We designed 6 different point mutants of SpoIIDWch: D48A, E55A, E93A, D107A, EE141-142AA, and E159A. We were able to express soluble versions of all mutants except the double mutant EE141-142AA, which was insoluble, possibly because of improper folding caused by the introduced mutations. However, the five other mutants were soluble and able to bind PG to the same extent as the wild-type version (Fig. 4B; see also Fig. S5A to C). We investigated their activity in a PG-release assay and observed that all showed activity on PG that was not significantly different from that seen with the wild-type strain, with the exception of the D48A mutant, which showed reduced activity (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, this residue is conserved either as a glutamic acid or as an aspartic acid among all sequenced Chlamydiales spp. (Fig. S1B).
Overexpression of SpoIIDWch in E. coli caused a growth defect in the absence of three SPOR proteins.
In order to test the activity of SpoIIDWch in vivo, we overexpressed this protein in E. coli. Overexpression of SpoIIDWch in a wild-type E. coli strain, akin to overexpression of SpoIIDBsu, did not cause any growth defect or filamentation (Fig. 6). We hypothesized that, in the wild-type strain, denuded PG could be protected from SpoIID activity, perhaps through the action of other PG-binding proteins and/or substrate limitation. Three SPOR domain-containing proteins, DamX, DedD, and RlpA, were recently described as being septally localized in E. coli (24) and as binding denuded PG (25). We thus overexpressed SpoIIDWch and SpoIIDBsu from a pSRK plasmid containing a promoter inducible by IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) in single mutants ΔdamX, ΔdedD, and ΔrlpA and in a triple mutant. IPTG-induced overexpression of SpoIIDs caused a growth defect in the triple mutant only (Fig. 6A), which is consistent with our hypothesis that the SPOR proteins might protect PG from the activity of SpoIIDs. Moreover, overexpression of SpoIIDs in the triple mutant induced a strong filamentation phenotype (Fig. 6B), indicating that the activity of SpoIIDs apparently blocks E. coli division. Interestingly, the viability of the bacteria was apparently not affected by overexpression of SpoIIDWch but was partially affected by overexpression of SpoIIDBsu, as measured by CFU counting (Fig. S5E). Overexpression of the point mutant SpoIIDWch D48A, which reached levels of proteins similar to those seen with the wild-type version (Fig. S5D), induced a lesser growth defect and a lesser filamentation phenotype (32% elongated bacteria compared to 56% for the wild-type version), further confirming its important role in the activity of SpoIIDWch (Fig. 6). Taken together, these results are favor the idea of conservation of activity between SpoIIDs of different species. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that overexpression of SpoIIDs in E. coli causes growth defect independently of the activity of SpoIIDs on PG. Nevertheless, the phenotypes showing lower levels of growth and filamentation observed with the D48A mutant, which is expressed at a level similar to that at which its wild-type counterpart is expressed, indicate that these phenotypes depend on SpoIID activity.
Conservation of proteins containing SpoIID domains in nonsporulating bacteria.
SpoIID activity was investigated mainly in bacteria undergoing sporulation. However, the SpoIID domain is conserved in many nonsporulating bacteria (18). This is consistent with the fact that SpoIID domain-containing proteins can also be found in bacterial clades that have apparently lost other sporulation proteins such as the sporulation regulator Spo0A, the sporulation-specific small acid-soluble protein SspA, and the enzyme involved in the synthesis of dipicolinate and the main component of bacterial spores, DpaA (Fig. S7). It was especially interesting to observe that SpoIID was conserved in a large majority of cyanobacteria, which are completely devoid of sporulation markers. We expressed cyanobacterial SpoIID from three model organisms of cyanobacteria, namely, Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803, Synechococcus sp. strain PCC7002, and Nostoc sp. strain PCC7120, in a wild-type E. coli strain and in the ΔdamX ΔdedD ΔrlpA triple mutant. Overexpression of Synechocystis and Synechococcus SpoIIDs caused no growth defect in the wild-type strain and only a moderate filamentation in the triple mutant (Fig. 7). In contrast, Nostoc SpoIID induced a strong growth defect in both the wild-type strain and the triple mutant (Fig. 7A). Moreover, Nostoc SpoIID overexpression caused lysis of the wild-type strain and filamentation of the triple mutant (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that cyanobacterial SpoIID seems to have an effect on the E. coli cell wall similar to the effect of SpoIIDWch, although the extents of the effects differ.
DISCUSSION
Proteins containing a SpoIID domain are well conserved in many diverse bacterial species. SpoIID of B. subtilis has been well studied and was shown previously to be a lytic transglycosylase required for PG remodeling during sporulation of this bacterium (18). Interestingly, the chlamydial SpoIID homologue protein might provide the transglycosylase activity required for rapid and complete PG degradation, similarly to its homologue in B. subtilis. Indeed, the SpoIID protein was detected as a PG-binding protein in a screen that we performed to investigate W. chondrophila proteins cosedimenting with PG (data not shown). Moreover, SpoIID could also be coimmunoprecipitated with the MreB membrane anchor RodZ. Chlamydial SpoIIDs show only a low level of amino acid identity with SpoIIDBsu (19.9% for W. chondrophila and 19.0% for C. trachomatis). Moreover, chlamydial SpoIIDs are quite divergent from each other, with a low identity level of 23.74% between SpoIIDWch and SpoIIDCtr (percentages of identity are calculated from the alignments presented in Fig. S1B in the supplemental material). However, the SpoIID domain is conserved, as are several glutamic acid and aspartic acid residues (Fig. 2, red stars). This is of interest since the activity of SpoIIDBsu requires a glutamic acid in the active site (22). We were able to show that SpoIIDWch, despite its low level of similarity to SpoIIDBsu, has similar activity in vitro with respect to PG. This level of activity was lowered when an aspartic acid present at position 48 was mutated (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, E. coli lacking SPOR proteins was sensitive to overexpression of both SpoIIDWch and SpoIIDBsu. This is consistent with a potential important role of SpoIID as a PG-binding protein. However, overexpression of SpoIIDWch in C. trachomatis had no clear effect on proliferation or on bacterial size (Fig. S6). Bacterial size measurements were slightly lower upon overexpression of SpoIIDWch, but this could be explained by the indirect effect of protein overexpression on the chlamydial mechanism. Taken together, these results indicate that overexpression of SpoIIDWch might not be sufficient to disturb C. trachomatis proliferation and that PG-modifying protein levels might be tightly regulated in Chlamydiales, or PG might be protected by other PG-binding proteins.
Since SpoIIDWch localizes at the division septum, we can hypothesize that chlamydial SpoIIDs are involved in PG degradation at the division septum and that this degradation is linked to inner membrane invagination and thus could be involved in septation. Interestingly, SpoIIDWch seems to degrade PG by two different mechanisms; we observed lytic transglycosylase activity on intact PG sacculi (resulting in anhydromuropeptides) and a muramidase activity on naked glycan chains (resulting mainly in nonanhydro glycan moieties). This potential bifunctional role of SpoIIDWch as lytic transglycosylase and muramidase, which is not shared by SpoIIDBsu, might thus be involved in PG degradation with amidases, which are present in Chlamydiales (15, 16), and the two roles might thus together result in complete recycling of chlamydial PG, which is consistent with the detection of PG in dividing Chlamydiae only (10). However, SpoIIDWch shows low activity on PG in vitro, indicating that it might require specific regulation in order to be fully active in vivo. Interestingly, we could show that SpoIIDWch and AmiAWch can act together in vitro to digest PG. Further studies will now be required to better characterize the role of chlamydial SpoIID in division and to better understand how PG biosynthesis and PG-modifying enzymes such as NlpD or AmiA work together with RodZ and MreB during divisome formation and septation.
Nevertheless, proteins containing a SpoIID domain are not restricted to bacteria known to sporulate. Indeed, many different bacterial species, such as a large majority of cyanobacteria, possess SpoIID homologues (18). In contrast, many bacteria exhibiting a SpoIID homologue do not possess homologues of other important sporulation genes (Fig. S7). We thus assume, as was proposed previously by Morlot et al. (18), that SpoIID might degrade glycan chains in many different bacteria, including nonsporulating ones, and might do so even at the division septum. Data showing spread of the SpoIID domain in very diverse bacterial phyla support the idea of an ancestral role of the SpoIID domain in PG remodeling/degradation in cell division first and then (only later) a specialized role in spore formation in sporulating bacteria. Proteins containing this domain may thus constitute a component of a minimal bacterial division machine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antibodies, probes, and reagents.
Polyclonal anti-Waddlia chondrophila rabbit antibodies were produced in-house as previously described (26). Unless otherwise indicated, reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Secondary Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse and 594 anti-rabbit antibodies originated from Molecular Probes (Grand Island, NY). SpoIID-coding genes containing point mutations as well as cyanobacterial SpoIID genes were synthetically produced by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). Strains and growth conditions are detailed in Text S1 in the supplemental material, and primers used in this study are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material.
Sequence alignments and signal sequence predictions.
Amino acid sequences of SpoIID homologues were downloaded from the NCBI website, aligned using MAFFT version v7.402 (27), and visualized using Jalview software v2 (28). Prediction of signal sequences and transmembrane domains was performed using SignalP v4.1 and the SignalP-noTM parameter (29) and TMHMM Server v. 2.0 (DTU Bioinformatics, Lyngby, Denmark).
Cell culture and bacterial infection.
Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) and McCoy (ATCC CRL-1696) cells were cultivated, and Vero cells were infected with W. chondrophila as described previously (14). Briefly, Vero cells or McCoy cells were grown in 75-cm3 flasks with 20 ml of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C and 5% CO2. Vero cells were harvested and counted. A cell suspension of 5 × 105 cells/ml was allowed to adhere overnight. Vero cells were then infected with a 2,000× dilution of W. chondrophila in DMEM supplemented with fetal calf serum. Infection was synchronized by centrifugation at 1,790 × g for 15 min and incubation at 37°C for an additional 15 min. The medium was then removed, and the cell layer was washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and further incubated in fresh medium at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
UPLC and UPLC-QTOF peptidoglycan analysis.
PG was purified from the corresponding bacteria according to the protocol reported previously by de Jonge et al. (30) and as detailed in Text S1 in the supplemental material. The supernatants containing purified PG were adjusted to pH 9.0 with sodium borate and reduced with sodium borohydride for 20 min at room temperature. Finally, samples were adjusted to pH 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid and filtered with 0.45-μm-pore-size filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA) before injection into chromatographic system for analysis. Liquid chromatography was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC H-class system (Waters, Milford, MA) equipped with a Waters Xevo G2-XS QTOF MS (Waters). Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (Waters) (1.7 μm pore size, 150 mm by 2.1-mm inner diameter [id]). The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (0.1% formic acid–Milli-Q water) and solvent B (0.1% formic acid–acetonitrile). The gradient was set as follows: 0 to 3 min, 2% to 5% solvent B; 3 to 6 min, 5% to 6.8% solvent B; 6 to 7.5 min, 6.8% to 9% solvent B; 7.5 to 9 min, 9% to 14% solvent B; 9 to 11 min, 14% to 20% solvent B; 11 to 12 min, hold at 20% solvent B, keeping the constant flow of 0.250 μl/min; 12 to 12.1 min, 20% to 90% solvent B with a flow rate ramp of 0.250 μl/min to 0.300 μl/min, further holding the same flow rate and percentage of solvent B until 13.5 min; 13.5 to 13.6 min, 90% to 2% solvent B; 13.6 to 16 min, hold at 2% solvent B. The flow rate was shifted again to 0.250 μl/min at 16.1 min. Chromatographic column was equilibrated until 18 min for next analysis. Chromatographic data were recorded at 204 nm.
Mass spectrometry was performed on a Xevo G2-XS QTOF (Waters), which is a quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer. The scan range ran from 100 to 2,000 m/z, with a scan time of 0.25 s. The instrument was operated in positive electrospray ionization mode. The capillary and sample cone voltages were 3 kV and 40 V, respectively. The gas flow rates were set at 100 and 500 liters/h for the cone gas and desolvation gas, respectively. The source temperature was 120°C, and the desolvation temperature was 350°C. For MSE, the low collision energy level was set at 6 eV, and the high collision energy level was ramped from 15 to 40 eV. A leucine-enkephalin reference was used at a concentration of 200 pg/ml as the lockmass, with a continuous flow rate of 5 μl/min and 0.25-s scan time, for an accurate analysis. All the processes involved in acquisition and analysis of data were controlled by Waters UNIFI software. Structural characterization of muropeptides was done on the basis of their MS and MS/MS fragmentation pattern data (31).
Coimmunoprecipitation.
Vero cells infected or not infected with W. chondrophila were harvested 24 h p.i. and lysed by incubation in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Sigma) as described by the manufacturer. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Antibodies raised against RodZ of W. chondrophila (14) were bound to Dynabeads protein A beads as described by the manufacturer (Life Technologies). Cell lysate (1 ml) was incubated with the beads on a wheel for 30 min at room temperature, washed 3 times, and subjected to elution using Laemmli buffer (Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA). The samples were then separated on SDS-PAGE, and bands were analyzed by mass spectrometry by the Protein Analysis Facility of the University of Lausanne.
Immunofluorescence labeling and confocal microscopy.
Immunofluorescence labeling was performed as described previously (14). Vero cells were grown and infected on glass coverslips. They were then fixed by incubating 5 min in ice-cold methanol, washing 3 times with PBS, and incubating for at least 1 h in blocking buffer (PBS, 1% BSA, 0.1% saponin). Cells that adhered to the coverslip were then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer, washed three times with PBS, and incubated further with secondary antibodies and DAPI in blocking buffer. Coverslips were then washed 4 times with PBS and once with distilled water and mounted on glass slides with Mowiol (Sigma-Aldrich). Confocal microscopy images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Subsequent treatment and quantification of images were performed with ImageJ software.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR.
RNA quantification was performed as described earlier (14). Briefly, infected cells were harvested, and RNA was stabilized by addition of RNA Protect (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) and incubation for 5 min at room temperature. The suspensions were then centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was removed, and pellet was kept at −80°C. RNA was extracted from the pellet using an RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen). DNA was removed by selective digestion with DNase from an Ambion DNA-free kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). cDNA was then synthesized by reverse transcription using a Goscript reverse transcription system (Promega), and spoIIDWch cDNA was quantified by qPCR performed on 4 μl of cDNA mixed with 10 μl of iTaq Universal SYBR green mix (Bio-Rad), 4.8 μl of water, and 0.6 μl each of primers SpoIID_RT_F and SpoIID_RT_R (Table S2) or 16S rRNA-specific primers WadF4 and WadR4 (32). qPCR was performed using a StepOne Plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA) under the following conditions: 3 min of denaturation at 95°C followed by 45 cycles of 15 s of denaturation at 95°C and 1 min of annealing/elongation at 60°C.
Peptidoglycan binding assay.
E. coli and B. subtilis PGs were extracted as described above. In the case of E. coli, samples were digested with pronase E (100 μg/ml)–10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) for 1 h at 60°C to remove Braun's lipoprotein. After addition of 1% (wt/vol) SDS, the reaction mixtures were heat inactivated and detergent was removed by washing in Milli-Q water. A 20-μl volume of purified PG was then incubated on ice with 2 μg of the indicated protein diluted in a total of 50 μl of PBS for 30 min. The pellet and supernatant were separated by ultracentrifugation. The pellet was washed once with PBS. Equivalent amounts of supernatant, wash, and pellet were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by Western blotting (see Text S1).
Peptidoglycan release assay.
The PG release assay was adapted from a method described previously by Morlot et al. (18). Briefly, E. coli PG was extracted as described above and digested overnight with α-amylase at 37°C. PG was then washed once with PBS, resuspended in 20 mM Remazol brilliant blue (RBB)–0.25 M NaOH, and incubated overnight at 37°C. The suspension was then neutralized with HCl, and excess dye was removed by repeated washes with PBS, to the point where the supernatant remained clear. A 40-μl volume of labeled PG was then incubated with 6 μg of the indicated proteins in a total of 100 μl PBS for 45 min at 37°C under conditions of agitation. PG was then sedimented by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and its absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a Fluo Star Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany).
E. coli growth and morphology tests.
E. coli strains were grown overnight in LB medium at 37°C. Optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was measured by spectrophotometry. All the strains were diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 per ml and incubated 1 h at 37°C. IPTG was then added at 1 mM if indicated. Growth was measured by spectrophotometry 2, 4, and 6 h after the dilution. Microscopy was performed 6 h after dilution, using a 100× objective on an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss). Lengths of bacteria were measured using ImageJ, and a minimum of 100 bacteria were classified as normal or elongated in duplicate in two independent experiments.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Sébastien Aeby (Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne) and the Cellular Imaging Facility and the Proteomic Analysis Facility of the University of Lausanne for technical support. We also thank Scott Hefty (University of Kansas, Lawrence) and Ken Fields (University of Kentucky, Lexington) for providing plasmids and David Weiss (University of Iowa, Iowa City) for providing strains.
The laboratory of F.C. received funding support from MIMS, KAW, Kempe, and the Swedish Research Council (VR). A.K.Y. was supported by an MIMS/VR postdoctoral position. The laboratory of G.G. was supported by the Swiss National Foundation (grant number SNSF 310030_162603).
N.J., F.C., P.H.V., and G.G. designed the experiments; N.J. and A.K.Y. performed the experiments; N.J., A.K.Y., T.P., and F.C. analyzed the data; N.J., A.K.Y., T.P., P.H.V., F.C., and G.G. participated in the elaboration of the manuscript.
We declare that we have no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Citation Jacquier N, Yadav AK, Pillonel T, Viollier PH, Cava F, Greub G. 2019. A SpoIID homolog cleaves glycan strands at the chlamydial division septum. mBio 10:e01128-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01128-19.
Contributor Information
Raphael Valdivia, Duke University.
Arash Komeili, University of California, Berkeley.
REFERENCES
- 1.Margolin W. 2005. FtsZ and the division of prokaryotic cells and organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:862–871. doi: 10.1038/nrm1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jacquier N, Viollier PH, Greub G. 2015. The role of peptidoglycan in chlamydial cell division: towards resolving the chlamydial anomaly. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:262–275. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cho H, Wivagg CN, Kapoor M, Barry Z, Rohs PD, Suh H, Marto JA, Garner EC, Bernhardt TG. 19 September 2016, posting date. Bacterial cell wall biogenesis is mediated by SEDS and PBP polymerase families functioning semi-autonomously. Nat Microbiol doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meeske AJ, Riley EP, Robins WP, Uehara T, Mekalanos JJ, Kahne D, Walker S, Kruse AC, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2016. SEDS proteins are a widespread family of bacterial cell wall polymerases. Nature 537:634–638. doi: 10.1038/nature19331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Taylor-Brown A, Vaughan L, Greub G, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. 2015. Twenty years of research into Chlamydia-like organisms: a revolution in our understanding of the biology and pathogenicity of members of the phylum Chlamydiae. Pathog Dis 73:1–15. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftu009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, Mitchell W, Olinger L, Tatusov RL, Zhao Q, Koonin EV, Davis RW. 1998. Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science 282:754–759. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bertelli C, Collyn F, Croxatto A, Ruckert C, Polkinghorne A, Kebbi-Beghdadi C, Goesmann A, Vaughan L, Greub G. 2010. The Waddlia genome: a window into chlamydial biology. PLoS One 5:e10890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Collingro A, Tischler P, Weinmaier T, Penz T, Heinz E, Brunham RC, Read TD, Bavoil PM, Sachse K, Kahane S, Friedman MG, Rattei T, Myers GS, Horn M. 2011. Unity in variety—the pan-genome of the Chlamydiae. Mol Biol Evol 28:3253–3270. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liechti GW, Kuru E, Hall E, Kalinda A, Brun YV, VanNieuwenhze M, Maurelli AT. 2014. A new metabolic cell-wall labelling method reveals peptidoglycan in Chlamydia trachomatis. Nature 506:507–510. doi: 10.1038/nature12892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liechti G, Kuru E, Packiam M, Hsu YP, Tekkam S, Hall E, Rittichier JT, VanNieuwenhze M, Brun YV, Maurelli AT. 2016. Pathogenic chlamydia lack a classical sacculus but synthesize a narrow, mid-cell peptidoglycan ring, regulated by MreB, for cell division. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005590. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pilhofer M, Aistleitner K, Biboy J, Gray J, Kuru E, Hall E, Brun YV, VanNieuwenhze MS, Vollmer W, Horn M, Jensen GJ. 2013. Discovery of chlamydial peptidoglycan reveals bacteria with murein sacculi but without FtsZ. Nat Commun 4:2856. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jacquier N, Frandi A, Viollier PH, Greub G. 2015. Disassembly of a medial transenvelope structure by antibiotics during intracellular division. Chem Biol 22:1217–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ouellette SP, Karimova G, Subtil A, Ladant D. 2012. Chlamydia co-opts the rod shape-determining proteins MreB and Pbp2 for cell division. Mol Microbiol 85:164–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jacquier N, Frandi A, Pillonel T, Viollier PH, Viollier P, Greub G. 2014. Cell wall precursors are required to organize the chlamydial division septum. Nat Commun 5:3578. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Frandi A, Jacquier N, Theraulaz L, Greub G, Viollier PH. 2014. FtsZ-independent septal recruitment and function of cell wall remodelling enzymes in chlamydial pathogens. Nat Commun 5:4200. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Klockner A, Otten C, Derouaux A, Vollmer W, Buhl H, De Benedetti S, Munch D, Josten M, Molleken K, Sahl HG, Henrichfreise B. 2014. AmiA is a penicillin target enzyme with dual activity in the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae. Nat Commun 5:4201. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ghuysen JM, Goffin C. 1999. Lack of cell wall peptidoglycan versus penicillin sensitivity: new insights into the chlamydial anomaly. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2339–2344. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.10.2339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Morlot C, Uehara T, Marquis KA, Bernhardt TG, Rudner DZ. 2010. A highly coordinated cell wall degradation machine governs spore morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 24:411–422. doi: 10.1101/gad.1878110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gutierrez J, Smith R, Pogliano K. 2010. SpoIID-mediated peptidoglycan degradation is required throughout engulfment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. J Bacteriol 192:3174–3186. doi: 10.1128/JB.00127-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Packiam M, Weinrick B, Jacobs WR Jr, Maurelli AT. 2015. Structural characterization of muropeptides from Chlamydia trachomatis peptidoglycan by mass spectrometry resolves “chlamydial anomaly”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11660–11665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514026112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Barsy M, Frandi A, Panis G, Theraulaz L, Pillonel T, Greub G, Viollier PH. 2016. Regulatory (pan-)genome of an obligate intracellular pathogen in the PVC superphylum. ISME J 10:2129–2144. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nocadello S, Minasov G, Shuvalova LS, Dubrovska I, Sabini E, Anderson WF. 2016. Crystal structures of the SpoIID lytic transglycosylases essential for bacterial sporulation. J Biol Chem 291:14915–14926. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.729749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dorr T, Cava F, Lam H, Davis BM, Waldor MK. 2013. Substrate specificity of an elongation-specific peptidoglycan endopeptidase and its implications for cell wall architecture and growth of Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 89:949–962. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arends SJ, Williams K, Scott RJ, Rolong S, Popham DL, Weiss DS. 2010. Discovery and characterization of three new Escherichia coli septal ring proteins that contain a SPOR domain: DamX, DedD, and RlpA. J Bacteriol 192:242–255. doi: 10.1128/JB.01244-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yahashiri A, Jorgenson MA, Weiss DS. 2015. Bacterial SPOR domains are recruited to septal peptidoglycan by binding to glycan strands that lack stem peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11347–11352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508536112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Croxatto A, Greub G. 2010. Early intracellular trafficking of Waddlia chondrophila in human macrophages. Microbiology 156:340–355. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.034546-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ. 2009. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2007. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc 2:953–971. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.de Jonge BL, Chang YS, Gage D, Tomasz A. 1992. Peptidoglycan composition of a highly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain. The role of penicillin binding protein 2A. J Biol Chem 267:11248–11254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Desmarais SM, Cava F, de Pedro MA, Huang KC. 2014. Isolation and preparation of bacterial cell walls for compositional analysis by ultra performance liquid chromatography. J Vis Exp doi: 10.3791/51183:e51183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goy G, Croxatto A, Posfay-Barbe KM, Gervaix A, Greub G. 2009. Development of a real-time PCR for the specific detection of Waddlia chondrophila in clinical samples. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:1483–1486. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0804-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.