Skip to main content
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2019 Jul 11;7(7):e11274. doi: 10.1002/aps3.11274

Characterization of microsatellite markers for the endangered Daphne rodriguezii (Thymelaeaceae) and related species

Carlos García‐Verdugo 1,2,, Juan Carlos Illera 3, Anna Traveset 4
PMCID: PMC6636617  PMID: 31346506

Abstract

Premise

The endangered shrub Daphne rodriguezii (Thymelaeaceae) is endemic to the Balearic island of Menorca, where fragmentation and severe population decline are ongoing threats to this taxon. We developed a set of microsatellite markers to analyze the fine‐scale genetics of its few extant populations.

Methods and Results

Fifteen microsatellite markers were obtained through Illumina high‐throughput sequencing and tested in two populations. Twelve of these loci showed no evidence of null alleles and were highly polymorphic, with a mean number of 8.3 alleles per locus. Levels of observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.100 to 0.952 and from 0.095 to 0.854, respectively. Seven to nine of these loci were successfully amplified in five other Daphne species.

Conclusions

This set of markers provides a useful tool for investigating the factors driving fine‐scale population structure in this threatened species, and it represents a novel genetic resource for other European Daphne species.

Keywords: Daphne rodriguezii, fine‐scale genetic structure, island genetic diversity, paternity analysis, Thymelaeaceae


The genus Daphne L. (Thymelaeaceae) comprises ca. 95 species with Eurasian and North African distributions (Brickell and Mathew, 1998). Several studies have highlighted their ecological and medicinal importance (Xu et al., 2011), but the genetic information available for the genus is still scarce, particularly for the 17 European species recognized thus far (e.g., Alonso and Herrera, 2011).

Daphne rodriguezii Texidor is a perennial shrub endemic to the Balearic island of Menorca. Because the species shows a highly fragmented distribution with severe population decline, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has recently reassessed its conservation status from “Vulnerable” to “Endangered” (Fraga i Arquimbau, 2017). The area of occupancy of D. rodriguezii is represented by as few as five main populations (<36 km2), all of them restricted to the eastern area of Menorca and the off‐shore islet of Colom (Calviño‐Cancela et al., 2012; Fraga i Arquimbau, 2017). Apart from its interest for biodiversity conservation, the species has been used as a model system to understand key ecological processes such as the impact of loss of dispersal agents (i.e., lizards) on the maintenance of island populations (Traveset and Riera, 2005; Rodríguez‐Pérez and Traveset, 2010). A previous phylogeographic study with plastid and amplified fragment length polymorphism data revealed a strong genetic structure among extant populations, but the unavailability of codominant markers for D. rodriguezii limited genetic inferences at the population level (Calviño‐Cancela et al., 2012). Generation of fine‐scale information with microsatellite markers for this species will provide insights on general patterns of heterozygosity across island systems (García‐Verdugo et al., 2015) and will help us understand how dispersal limitation impacts the genetic structure of small island populations (Saro et al., 2019).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Microsatellite development was conducted by Ecogenics GmbH (Balgach, Switzerland) from genomic DNA extracted from silica‐dried D. rodriguezii leaf tissue. An Illumina TruSeq nano DNA library (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) was prepared following the manufacturer's recommendations and analyzed on an Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform using the Nano 2 × 250 v2 format. A total of 1,507,789 raw reads were processed. The paired‐end reads that passed the Illumina's chastity filter were subject to de‐multiplexing and trimming of Illumina adapter residuals, and subsequently checked with the FastQC v0.11.7 software (Andrews, 2010). Following quality check, paired‐end reads were analyzed with the software USEARCH v10.0.240 (Edgar, 2010), which resulted in 99,945 merged reads that were further screened with the software Tandem Repeats Finder v4.09 (Benson, 1999). Microsatellite sequences with a tetra‐ or trinucleotide of a minimum of six repeat units (or a dinucleotide of at least 10 repeat units) were detected in 4584 merged reads. Primers were designed for 2950 microsatellite regions using Primer3 (Untergasser et al., 2012). From these candidate loci, and with the aim of optimizing marker characterization, we performed an initial step of simple sequence repeat (SSR) polymorphism testing by amplifying 36 loci in a subset of seven D. rodriguezii individuals. These loci were screened based on the motif (i.e., trinucleotide SSRs were preferred over dinucleotide SSRs), the size of the amplified fragment (for optimization of the subsequent design of multiplexed reactions), and their successful amplification in all of the samples. Considering the allele size ranges and the apparent lack of null alleles across the seven individuals tested, we finally used 15 out of the 36 loci to evaluate their usefulness in revealing polymorphism with larger (i.e., population level) sample sizes.

In examining the levels of variability revealed by each SSR locus, we were constrained by the conservation status (EN) of the study species. However, we were able to obtain permissions to sample leaf material from two populations representing size extremes (Calviño‐Cancela et al., 2012): (1) the only population with more than 300 mature individuals (population A) and (2) a population with <50 individuals (population B) (Appendix 1). Genomic DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Plant II kit (Macherey‐Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)–lysis method. PCRs for SSR amplification were set up in 10‐μL reactions, including 1.5 μL of DNA (2–10 ng/μL), 5 μL of 2× Multiplex PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and 0.3 μL (0.3 μM) of each primer, with the forward primer labeled with a fluorescent dye (Table 1). Reactions were performed on a G‐Storm GS2 thermal cycler (Somerton Biotechnology Centre, Somerset, United Kingdom) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s; and a final extension at 60°C for 30 min.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 15 microsatellite loci developed in Daphne rodriguezii.

Locusa Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif Allele size range (bp) A Multiplex Fluorescent dye GenBank accession no.
Dro012 F: CATAATGCTGACGTGGACGG (CTT)9 237–270 11 1 FAM MK507747
R: ATGGAGGCGGGAAACTTAGG
Dro019 F: CGGAGGGATTCAAACTTGGG (ATT)9 246–258 5 4 FAM MK507756
R: TGTTGACTTCAATTTTTGTGCGG
Dro025 F: TAACGGCATTGCAGGTTTTC (TA)26 157–159 2 5 FAM MK507759
R: GGGTGTATAGCCCCTACGTC
Dro028 F: TAAAAAGCGCCGGACTCAAG (TCT)12 175–190 6 2 FAM MK507752
R: AGCTGGTTCCGTACGATGAG
Dro034 F: TGGCAGTAGACAACATTAGTGG (TTA)17 199–238 12 3 HEX MK507754
R: AGACGTGCTGAAGACAGTTC
Dro035 F: AACATCGATTTCTGTCGCGG (TA)16 204–210 2 4 HEX MK507760
R: ACGGGGCTTTTTGTGCATTC
Dro041 F: GAATCCCAACTGCATCGTGG (GAT)14GG(TGA)9 240–261 8 2 FAM MK507750
R: TGGGCTTGTCATGGTAAACG
Dro042 F: AGGGTATTTCGTGGGCTGG (TTA)21 243–318 17 3 FAM MK507753
R: ACAATGTAAAAAGCAAGAAATCCAC
Dro046 F: CCCGCTTTACTTCAGTGTCG (CAT)12 180–204 7 3 FAM MK507755
R: ATCGCTAAGATTCGGGTTGC
Dro048 F: CTCCAAACCATTTCCTGAGTCG (TA)14 218–236 9 2 HEX MK507751
R: ACACCACGCCATTTAATTCTCC
Dro073 F: GACTGACGATGTCTACATGAGC (AT)21 205–217 2 5 HEX MK507761
R: GGTGGAGTACAACCATCCTTTG
Dro078 F: TTATGGGCTTAGAGCCACCG (AT)22 185–223 15 4 FAM MK507758
R: AAAGTCGCCACCGGAAAATG
Dro113 F: TTTGGCTTTGAACCATCCCG (TCT)11 114–132 6 1 FAM MK507749
R: GTCCAAACACCAACTATAATGAAAGC
Dro114 F: ACGCTTCCGCAATATGATCG (TCT)10 198–234 11 1 HEX MK507748
R: CAGACGATACTGAGGGGTGG
Dro124 F: AGAGCTTTCCAAGAATTGATGTAG (AAT)20 233–287 12 5 FAM MK507757
R: TACCCATGCACGGAGTGTG

A = number of alleles found across all D. rodriguezii samples.

a

Optimal annealing temperature = 56°C for all loci.

To test cross‐species amplification of D. rodriguezii primers, all 15 SSR loci were amplified in closely related Daphne species (Alonso and Herrera, 2011), including leaf material freshly collected from one population of D. laureola L. and two to three replicates from herbarium samples for D. cneorum L., D. gnidium L., D. mezereum L., and D. oleoides Schreb. (Appendix 1). Rather than testing multiple samples in a closely related species, our aim was to test the cross‐amplification of loci using a broader taxonomic coverage. PCR followed the same conditions previously described for D. rodriguezii, but annealing temperatures were chosen based on a temperature gradient protocol ranging from 50–65°C for each primer and Daphne species (see Appendix 2). PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with GelRed (Biotium Inc., Fremont, California, USA) and sequenced on an ABI PRISM 3130xl Genetic Analyzer sequencer using a GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). GeneMarker 2.4.0 software (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA) was used for visualizing the electropherograms and performing allele scoring.

The software GENETIX (Belkhir et al., 2001) was used to obtain the number of alleles per locus and estimates of observed and expected heterozygosities. Tests for linkage disequilibrium and potential deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium following a sequential Bonferroni correction for multiple tests were run on GENEPOP 4.7.0 (Rousset, 2008). MICRO‐CHECKER 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004) was used to assess the presence of null alleles at each locus and population.

At the population level, the number of alleles per locus ranged from one to 11 (Table 2). The level of observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.000 to 0.952, and the level of expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.000 to 0.854 (Table 2). Three loci (Dro025, Dro035, Dro073) were fixed, or nearly so, for a single allele per population. The remaining 12 loci showed substantial levels of polymorphism, with a mean of 8.3 alleles per locus. Only one locus (Dro078) showed significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after sequential Bonferroni correction in population B, most probably because this was the only combination of locus and population for which null alleles were clearly identified by MICRO‐CHECKER. Significant (P < 0.001) linkage disequilibrium was found between loci Dro046 and Dro124, but only for population B.

Table 2.

Genetic properties of the 15 microsatellite markers tested in two populations of Daphne rodriguezii. a

Locus Population A (n = 22) Population B (n = 20)
N A H o b H e N A H o b H e
Dro012 21 9 0.809 0.851 20 6 0.750 0.772
Dro019 22 5 0.636 0.674 20 3 0.450 0.359
Dro025 20 2 0.100 0.095 20 1 0.000 0.000
Dro028 22 5 0.772 0.700 20 6 0.800 0.766
Dro034 21 8 0.630* 0.810 19 8 0.700 0.791
Dro035 20 1 0.000 0.000 20 1 0.000 0.000
Dro041 22 6 0.727 0.736 20 7 0.750 0.741
Dro042 20 11 0.900 0.778 20 10 0.750 0.821
Dro046 22 7 0.500 0.593 20 3 0.450 0.563
Dro048 22 9 0.600 0.751 20 7 0.850 0.805
Dro073 21 1 0.000 0.000 18 1 0.000 0.000
Dro078 22 11 0.772 0.824 20 10 c 0.550*** 0.826
Dro113 22 6 0.772 0.747 20 5 0.600 0.728
Dro114 21 11 0.801 0.854 19 6 0.400 0.441
Dro124 21 11 0.952 0.844 20 8 0.600 0.646

A = number of alleles detected across D. rodriguezii samples; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of samples tested; N = number of samples with successful amplifications.

a

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

b

Asterisks indicate significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (*P < 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001).

c

Presence of null alleles.

In addition, this panel of microsatellites rendered positive amplifications in a minimum of seven loci per species (Table 3). The limited availability of herbarium samples per species precluded a clear assessment of the levels of polymorphism detected with these markers, but for some species (D. laureola, D. cneorum, D. oleoides), even relatively low sample sizes revealed that at least half of the amplified loci exhibited more than one allele (Table 3).

Table 3.

Cross‐amplification of microsatellite markers developed for Daphne rodriguezii in five closely related species. a

Locus D. laureola (N = 5) D. cneorum (N = 2) D. gnidium (N = 2) D. mezerum (N = 1) D. oleoides (N = 2)
Dro012 279 255 251 257, 271
Dro019 247
Dro025 156 136, 151, 163 152, 156, 168 156 154, 156, 162, 164
Dro028 190 235, 239, 253, 289 198 201, 207, 213
Dro034
Dro035 204, 206 205, 207 192 204, 206 204, 206
Dro041 181, 184 184 184 184
Dro042 314, 317, 320 164 290 180
Dro046 266 173, 179
Dro048
Dro073 205, 217 205 205, 217 205, 217 205
Dro078 148, 157, 173
Dro113 122 107
Dro114 212
Dro124 155 233, 253

— = unsuccessful amplification; N = number of samples tested for each species.

a

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The set of microsatellites characterized for D. rodriguezii is a powerful, cost‐effective tool for detecting substantial levels of genetic variation using a relatively low number of multiplexed reactions, even in small populations. Such a genetic resolution will allow us to assess parentage relationships in forthcoming studies on fine‐scale genetic structure. Additionally, the successful rates of cross‐amplification of these loci suggest that population genetic studies with these markers could be easily extended to other closely related Daphne species.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

C.G.‐V. and A.T. planned the study and collected plant tissue, J.C.I. and C.G.‐V. conducted laboratory work and allele scoring, and C.G.‐V. performed the analyses and wrote the manuscript, with input from J.C.I. and A.T.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank J. P. González‐Varo for field assistance, and L. Viesca and E. Cires for laboratory assistance. The department of Servei de Protecció d'Espècies (Govern de les Illes Balears) provided legal permission for population sampling. J.C.I. was funded by a GRUPIN research grant from the Regional Government of Asturias (Ref.: IDI/2018/000151), and C.G.‐V. was supported by a Vicenç Mut postdoctoral fellowship awarded by the Govern de les Illes Balears–Conselleria d'Innovació, Recerca i Turisme. The study was funded by the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (project Islet‐Foodwebs CGL2017‐88122‐P).

APPENDIX 1. Voucher and location information for species and populations used in the characterization of microsatellite markers for Daphne rodriguezii and related species.

Taxon (Population) Voucher specimen accession no.a Collection locality Geographic coordinates N
Daphne rodriguezii Texidor (popA) JBAG8300 Colom, Menorca 39°57.5′N, 04°16.9′E 22
Daphne rodriguezii (popB) JBAG8301 Mesquida, Menorca 39°54.5′N, 04°17.0′E 20
Daphne cneorum L. JBAG656 Valle del Soba, Cantabria 43°09.5′N, 03°34.1′W 3
Daphne gnidium L. JBAG877 Dumbría, La Coruña 43°00.9′N, 09°07.4′W 3
Daphne laureola L. JBAG8299 Ponga, Asturias 43°12.7′N, 05°05.5′W 5
Daphne mezereum L. JACA78470 Canfranc, Huesca 42°42.2′N, 00°34.1′W 2
Daphne oleoides Schreb. JBAG384 La Rapa, Granada 37°20.1′N, 02°50.2′W 2

N = number of individuals initially assayed (some herbarium samples did not provide clear amplifications and were not used for polymorphism testing; see Table 3).

a

All herbarium specimens are deposited at the Jardín Botánico Atlántico herbarium (JBAG), Asturias, Spain, including one donation from the Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología herbarium (JACA), Jaca, Spain.

APPENDIX 2. Optimal PCR annealing temperatures (◦C) used for cross‐species amplification of microsatellite markers developed for Daphne rodriguezii in five closely related species.

Locus D. cneorum D. gnidium D. laureola D. mezereum D. oleoides
Dro012 55.7 52.6 MB 52.6 60.2
Dro019 55.7
Dro025 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0
Dro028 50.0 60.0 60.0 50.0
Dro034 MB
Dro035 63.6 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0
Dro041 51.0 50.0 50.0 50.1
Dro042 55.7 60.0 51.2 51.2
Dro046 51.2 50.1
Dro048
Dro073 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0
Dro078 50.1 MB
Dro114 MB MB MB 60.0 MB
Dro113 59.1 60.2
Dro124 52.6 55.7

— = unsuccessful amplification; MB = multiple bands.

García‐Verdugo, C. , Illera J. C., and Traveset A.. 2019. Characterization of microsatellite markers for the endangered Daphne rodriguezii (Thymelaeaceae) and related species. Applications in Plant Sciences 7(7): e11274.

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

The primers and microsatellite sequences developed in this study have been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers MK507747MK507761; Table 1). Raw sequence library data were deposited in the Short Read Archive of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (BioProject accession number: PRJNA523502).

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Alonso, C. , and Herrera C. M.. 2011. Back‐and‐forth hermaphroditism: Phylogenetic context of reproductive system evolution in subdioecious Daphne laureola . Evolution 65: 1680–1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S. 2010. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Website http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ [accessed 17 July 2018].
  3. Belkhir, K. , Borsa P., Goudet J., Chikhi L., and Bonhomme F.. 2001. GENETIX, Logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la genetique des populations. Laboratoire Genome et Populations, Universite de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
  4. Benson, G. 1999. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 27: 573–580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brickell, C. D. , and Mathew B.. 1998. Daphne. The genus in the wild and in cultivation. Alpine Garden Society, Birmingham, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  6. Calviño‐Cancela, M. , Escudero M., Rodríguez‐Pérez J., Cano E., Vargas P., Velo‐Antón G., and Traveset A.. 2012. The role of seed dispersal, pollination and historical effects on genetic patterns of an insular plant that has lost its only seed disperser. Journal of Biogeography 39: 1996–2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. Edgar, R. C. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460–2461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fraga i Arquimbau, P. 2017. Daphne rodriguezii . The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T161922A103535606. 10.2305/iucn.uk.2017-3.rlts.t161922a103535606.en [DOI]
  9. García‐Verdugo, C. , Sajeva M., La Mantia T., Harrouni C., Msanda F., and Caujapé‐Castells J.. 2015. Do island plant populations really have lower genetic variation than mainland populations? Effects of selection and distribution range on genetic diversity estimates. Molecular Ecology 24: 726–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rodríguez‐Pérez, J. , and Traveset A.. 2010. Seed dispersal effectiveness in a plant–lizard interaction and its consequences for plant regeneration after disperser loss. Plant Ecology 207: 269–280. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rousset, F. 2008. GENEPOP: A complete re‐implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saro, I. , García‐Verdugo C., González‐Pérez M. A., Naranjo A., Santana A., and Sosa P. A.. 2019. Genetic structure of the Canarian palm tree (Phoenix canariensis) at the island scale: Does the ‘island within islands’ concept apply to species with high colonisation ability? Plant Biology 21: 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Traveset, A. , and Riera N.. 2005. Disruption of a plant‐lizard seed dispersal system and its ecological effects on a threatened endemic plant in the Balearic Islands. Conservation Biology 19: 422–431. [Google Scholar]
  14. Untergasser, A. , Cutcutache I., Koressaar T., Ye J., Faircloth B. C., Remm B., and Rozen S. G.. 2012. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van Oosterhout, C. , Hutchinson W. F., Wills D. P. M., and Shipley P.. 2004. MICRO‐CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xu, W. C. , Shen J. G., and Jiang J. Q.. 2011. Phytochemical and biological studies of the plants from the genus Daphne . Chemistry and Biodiversity 8: 1215–1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The primers and microsatellite sequences developed in this study have been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers MK507747MK507761; Table 1). Raw sequence library data were deposited in the Short Read Archive of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (BioProject accession number: PRJNA523502).


Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES