Abstract
Polyketides are a class of specialised metabolites synthesised by both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. These chemically and structurally diverse molecules are heavily used in the clinic and include frontline antimicrobial and anticancer drugs such as erythromycin and doxorubicin. To replenish the clinicians’ diminishing arsenal of bioactive molecules, a promising strategy aims at transferring polyketide biosynthetic pathways from their native producers into the biotechnologically desirable host Escherichia coli. This approach has been successful for type I modular polyketide synthases (PKSs); however, despite more than 3 decades of research, the large and important group of type II PKSs has until now been elusive in E. coli. Here, we report on a versatile polyketide biosynthesis pipeline, based on identification of E. coli–compatible type II PKSs. We successfully express 5 ketosynthase (KS) and chain length factor (CLF) pairs—e.g., from Photorhabdus luminescens TT01, Streptomyces resistomycificus, Streptoccocus sp. GMD2S, Pseudoalteromonas luteoviolacea, and Ktedonobacter racemifer—as soluble heterodimeric recombinant proteins in E. coli for the first time. We define the anthraquinone minimal PKS components and utilise this biosynthetic system to synthesise anthraquinones, dianthrones, and benzoisochromanequinones (BIQs). Furthermore, we demonstrate the tolerance and promiscuity of the anthraquinone heterologous biosynthetic pathway in E. coli to act as genetically applicable plug-and-play scaffold, showing it to function successfully when combined with enzymes from phylogenetically distant species, endophytic fungi and plants, which resulted in 2 new-to-nature compounds, neomedicamycin and neochaetomycin. This work enables plug-and-play combinatorial biosynthesis of aromatic polyketides using bacterial type II PKSs in E. coli, providing full access to its many advantages in terms of easy and fast genetic manipulation, accessibility for high-throughput robotics, and convenient biotechnological scale-up. Using the synthetic and systems biology toolbox, this plug-and-play biosynthetic platform can serve as an engine for the production of new and diversified bioactive polyketides in an automated, rapid, and versatile fashion.
This study describes a “plug-and-play” synthetic biology platform for producing variants of type II polyketides in Escherichia coli, opening the door for high-throughput discovery of antimicrobials and other active pharmaceutical ingredients.
Introduction
Natural products and their synthetic derivatives provide important clinically used therapeutic agents, accounting for 73% of antibacterial agents and 83% of anticancer agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 1981 and 2014 [1]. Polyketides represent a central class of these natural products, with remarkably targeted and potent pharmacological properties and highly diverse chemical structures. Although their native biological role is still debated, polyketides continue to have significant medical value as potent antitumor agents, antibiotics, immunosuppressants, antiparasitics, and cholesterol-lowering agents, among other applications [2]. The chemistry underpinning polyketide biosynthesis is widely conserved and carried out by biosynthetic machinery of 3 major classes [3]. In almost all cases, the polyketide biosynthesis machinery is highly modular at the genetic, enzymatic, and chemical level [4]. This intrinsic modularity of polyketide synthases (PKSs) was a key motivation behind classical approaches to derivatisation of natural products, and for the same reason PKSs have been favorite targets for the recent pathway engineering and natural product derivatisation renaissance using synthetic biology [5].
Polyketide biosynthesis is exceptionally diverse within the phylum Actinobacteria, and members of this taxon have been the source of numerous successful therapeutics. The Actinobacteria undergo complex morphological differentiation during different phases of growth, typically grow slowly, are fastidious, are not able to be grown in 96-well microtitre plates, and often are not genetically tractable. Though some Actinobacteria (e.g., Streptomyces albus) have more convenient features, these attributes make Actinobacteria unattractive hosts for the synthetic biologist to engineer polyketide biosynthetic gene clusters in large numbers, and alternative heterologous hosts are preferentially utilised, including E. coli. This is especially pertinent when intending to exploit the advantages of high-throughput pathway assembly using robotics. However, despite major efforts over several decades, heterologous overexpression of aromatic producing bacterial type II PKS machinery—specifically, the minimal polyketide synthase (mPKS) comprising a ketosynthase (KS) and chain length factor (CLF) and acyl carrier protein (ACP) (Fig 1)—in the biotechnologically favourable host species E. coli has remained elusive. A large number of combinatorial biosynthetic experiments have demonstrated the promiscuity and potential of type II PKS enzymatic components to synthesise new chemical entities; however, almost all have necessitated the use of an actinobacterial expression host.
Considerable effort has been made to circumvent this problematic bottleneck. An engineered nonreducing fungal PKS (NR-PKS) has been expressed in E. coli together with type II PKS cyclases to produce the nonaketide shunt metabolite SEK26 by Zhang and colleagues (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008) [10]. However, expanding the chemical space is difficult when using poorly understood fungal NR-PKS; e.g., to alter the polyketide chain length, an entirely new NR-PKS would be required [6,7], whilst chain length can be altered easily when using the bacterial type II machinery through introducing as little as 1 amino acid substitution [6]. Furthermore, without a starter unit loading domain, fungal NR-PKSs cannot introduce important non-acetyl starter units into aromatic polyketides, whilst these can be introduced to dissociable bacterial type II PKSs pathways [7, 8] through priming unit substitutions (Fig 1), without a need to engineer the PKS. Interestingly, the aromatic polyketide oxytetracycline (OTC) has been detected in E. coli overexpressing both the complete native OTC biosynthesis gene cluster (BGC) from Streptomyces rimosus and the E. coli alternative sigma factor σ54; however, the key enzymes, OxyA (KS) and OxyB (CLF), were not detectable among the soluble or insoluble proteins [9]. Other attempts to achieve mPKS expression in E. coli have either resulted in unobservable expression or inactive inclusion body formation [9–11]. The cause of KS/CLF insolubility has not been experimentally characterised, but inharmonious rates of translation, protein folding, and heterodimerisation have all been suggested as contributing factors [11].
The intractability of this class of bacterial PKSs in E. coli is limiting next-generation combinatorial approaches for the discovery of new and potent aromatic polyketide therapeutics. Actinobacteria, main natural hosts of type II PKSs, are not currently suitable for automated high-throughput technologies, due to their slow and often unpredictable filamentous growth behavior and their requirement for high aeration. Whilst many important combinatorial studies have taken place in Actinobacteria, translation of type II PKSs into biotechnologically suitable hosts will undoubtedly expedite automated generation of chemically diverse aromatic polyketide libraries.
Here, we report the successful functional expression of a soluble and heterodimeric bacterial type II PKS in E. coli for the first time, establishing a plug-and-play production line that opens the door to successful biochemical diversification and biotechnological exploitation of polyketides in a versatile and tractable heterologous expression host. We exemplify the value of this platform as a plug-and-play scaffold by demonstrating tolerance and promiscuity of the recombinant biosynthetic pathway to function successfully when complemented with sequence diverse and structurally diverse homologues from phylogenetically distant species. This E. coli–based platform can now serve as a starting point for iterative E. coli–based exploration of aromatic polyketide biosynthesis in a combinatorial fashion using a highly modular approach (Fig 2).
Results
Identification of candidate KS/CLF dimer pairs for heterologous expression in E. coli
The major challenge in establishing this platform was the identification of soluble mPKS systems for use in E. coli. Instead of using a trial-and-error approach, we used evolutionary insights into the formation of type II PKSs [12] to identify suitable KS/CLF pairs. Both type I and type II PKSs have been the subject of in-depth evolutionary modelling and phylogenetic analysis in recent years [12–15]. Phylogenetic analysis of large datasets of type II PKSs indicates that canonical type II PKS KS and CLF pairs arose from an ancient KS duplication event, most likely from a FabF-like fatty acid KS [12, 15]. Therefore, the intrinsically soluble FabF protein from E. coli, sharing a common ancestor with canonical type II PKSs, was used to query candidate KS pairs for heterologous expression in E. coli. To do so, a dataset of 58 experimentally characterised type II KS sequences was acquired from the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster (MIBiG) repository [16] and aligned with 3 FabF candidates from Streptomyces avermitilis, Bacillus subtilis, and E. coli. KS sequences were chosen to search for homologues, because these represent the catalytic part of the mPKS protein dimer and are more similar to FabF than the passive, and typically more sequence diverse, CLFs. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the sequence alignment identified 2 KSs—RemA from the resistomycin BGC from S. resistomycificus and AntD from the anthraquinone BGC of P. luminescens TT01—to associate more closely with the FabF homologues than all other KS sequences acquired from the MiBIG dataset (Fig 3A); both KS and cognate CLF pairs were plausible first candidates for successful heterologous expression in active and soluble form in E. coli.
Further analysis was conducted on KS/CLF sequences from underexplored phyla. Expectedly, analysis of 2,552 reference genome sequences identified predicted BGCs spanning all 42 classes in the dataset. A phylogenetic tree of characterised actinobacterial and uncharacterised non-actinobacterial KS/CLFs was created to further determine their relationship (S1 Fig, S1 Text, S1 Table).
Biosynthesis of shunt metabolites by the resistomycin mPKS was previously shown to require coexpression of an additional cyclase [17]. This context dependency may limit the chemical diversity accessible through combinatorial biosynthesis of early biosynthetic shunt metabolites, which are shown to have valuable bioactivities. In contrast, the AntD-containing BGC, responsible for biosynthesis of anthraquinone pigments in the nematode symbiont P. luminescens TT01, was a more attractive candidate because biosynthesis of its anthraquinone core is proposed to be enzymatically congruent with biosynthesis of actinorhodin, the archetypal aromatic polyketide [18]. Though taxonomically P. luminescens is close to E. coli, there has been no previous report of expressing the P. luminescens anthraquinone PKS in E. coli, and there has been no previous report of using the P. luminescens anthraquinone mPKS (antDEF) in combinatorial biosynthesis for the production of novel aromatic compounds in E. coli.
Evaluating solubility and dimer formation of the identified KS and CLF in E. coli
The entire mPKS complement from P. luminescens, comprising the KS AntD, CLF AntE, and ACP AntF, were successfully expressed as soluble recombinant proteins in E. coli BL21(DE3). Furthermore, AntD and AntE were observed as soluble proteins when overexpressed at 20°C and 30°C for >12 h, indicating transcription, translation, and protein folding to be robust (Fig 3C).
Whilst AntD and AntE are both soluble recombinant proteins in E. coli, the role of AntE as a functional heterodimer partner for AntD was unknown. Sequence features of AntE defy conventions of characterised CLFs: alignment of CLF amino acid sequences in our dataset showed AntE to fringe the clade of canonical CLFs (Fig 3B) and to also lack hallmark and gatekeeper residues that play important roles in polyketide biosynthesis (S1 Text, S2 Fig, S3 Fig, S2 Table). Most notably, the C-terminal third of AntE shows no sequence similarity to any CLF within our dataset; sequence divergence here might indicate that AntE is degenerate and no longer functional.
To examine whether a heterodimeric complex is formed by AntD and AntE, a 6 polyhistidine tag (His6) fusion of AntE was coexpressed with AntD in E. coli BL21(DE3). Protein purified via immobilised metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) and visualised by denaturing sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) showed 2 distinct bands of similar intensity corresponding closely with the theoretical molecular weight of AntD and His6AntE (Fig 3D). Western blotting (Fig 3E) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS) analysis (Materials and methods) of both bands confirmed that these correspond to AntD and AntE, respectively. Co-purification of AntD with AntE agrees with the assumption that stable AntDE hetereodimers are formed in E. coli.
In addition to AntDE, the resistomycin KS and CLF (RemA and B) were also soluble recombinant proteins in the E. coli background (S4 Fig). Expression of RemB in the absence of its KS counterpart resulted in 100% inclusion body formation, indicating that RemAB interactions are necessary for protein solubility. Moreover, a Streptavidin-II (Strep-II)–tagged RemA fusion protein co-purified with His6 RemB by IMAC, further confirming RemAB heterodimeric complex formation in vivo.
To test the solubility of the identified KS/CLFs from underexplored phyla, 7 were selected and evaluated (S1 Text, S1 Table). Type II PKS BGCs from Delftia acidovorans CCUG274B, Streptoccocus sp. GMD2s, P. luteoviolacea, Bacillus endophyticus DSM 13796, Candidatus Desulfofervidus auxilii, and K. racemifer were selected, and the solubility of each corresponding KS and CLF was evaluated as heterodimers and monomers in E. coli BL21(DE3) by introduction of codon-optimised genes. Three showed solubility in E. coli: the KS/CLF from Streptococcus spp. (SspA/B), K. racemifer DSM44963 (SOSP1-21 type strain) (KraA/B), and P. luteoviolacea DSM 6061 (PluA/B) (S5–S8 Figs). The expression conditions were not optimised for the selected KS/CLF pairs; hence, not all enzymes were immediately soluble in E. coli. However, because 3 enzyme pairs already are soluble, this was encouraging for the future full characterisation of these KS/CLF pairs for further refactoring to greatly expand the aromatic polyketide chemical space currently accessible in E. coli.
Testing functionality of the PKS
Expression of soluble heterodimeric aromatic polyketide producing KS/CLF complexes in E. coli is unprecedented and was the first step towards development of an E. coli–based combinatorial biosynthetic platform for aromatic polyketides. We next sought to test KS/CLF functionality, and to do so, the AntDE-expressing strains were taken forward, because it was markedly more soluble than the other complexes in E. coli.
The components of the P. luminescens anthraquinone mPKS (antDEF) were introduced and expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) on the plasmid pBbB1a-plumPKS (S3 Table). Previous studies had shown that a P. luminescens TT01 lacking 1 anthraquinone-associated cyclase accumulated mutactin and dehydromutactin, suggesting that the mPKS synthesises a 16-carbon octaketide primed with an acetyl starter unit [18]. Thus, the expected shunt metabolites formed by the mPKS were the acetyl-primed octaketides SEK4 and SEK4b and their respective dehydrated forms (Fig 2).
However, expression of the mPKS (antDEF) alone did not produce any detectable masses corresponding to SEK4/SEK4b (Fig 4, sample III). A lack of detectable octaketides suggested E. coli endogenous 4′ phosphopantetheinyl transferases (PPTases)—AcpS and EntD—could not efficiently functionalise ACP (AntF) with a 4′ phosphopantetheine arm necessary for activity. Alternative auxiliary enzymes, the anthraquinone-associated PPTase (antB) and Coenzyme A (CoA) ligase (antG), were required to carry out this posttranslation modification, which resulted in detectable biosynthesis of molecules putatively identified as SEK4, SEK4b, and AUR367 (Fig 4, sample IV): MS-MS fragmentation patterns of the putatively assigned octaketides were consistent with values reported in the literature [19] (S9 Fig). Interestingly, in the absence of AntG, the putatively assigned CoA ligase, a 13-fold decrease in SEK4 and SEK4b relative ion intensities was observed compared with the antDEFBG-expressing strain. This reduction in metabolite concentration suggests that AntF (ACP) is charged by the anthraquinone-associated PPTase (AntB) and that AntG functions as an acyl-ACP synthetase and directly and selectively loads holo-AntF with an acyl-CoA substrate [20], thus being a necessary component of the mPKS (Fig 1). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the AntG additionally has the originally suggested CoA ligase activity.
Exploring end-compound production of the anthraquinone biosynthetic gene cluster
In addition to the mPKS (extension units) and auxiliary CoA ligase and PPTase (priming units), primary tailoring enzymes are common to all aromatic PKS pathways and form principal components of the tailoring unit (Fig 2). The anthraquinone biosynthetic gene cluster of P. luminescens is no different and encodes 4 other enzymes with putative assigned functions, including a C9-ketoreductase (KR), 2 cyclases, and a hydrolase/peptidase. The full complement of biosynthetic genes is predicted to produce 1,3,8-trihydroxyanthrone (Fig 2, compound 12), and—in a similar fashion to aurachin biosynthesis [21, 22]—additional tailoring enzymes responsible for further modification of the polyketide core are thought to exist in extension clusters situated elsewhere on the P. luminescens genome. Accordingly, we sought to determine whether the extended biosynthetic pathway was functional in E. coli and able to produce the expected anthrone (Fig 2 compound 12). To do so, the entire anthraquinone cluster (accession no. BX470251.1, MIBiG no. BGC0000196, 9,166 bp) was introduced into pACYCDuet-1 and expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). The exometabolome of the resulting strain was analysed for the production of key expected octaketide shunt metabolites as well as plausible octaketide end products (S2 Text, S10–S12 Figs).
Masses corresponding to 1,3,8-trihydroxyanthrone (compound 12) were only observed at trace levels using high-resolution MS in both positive and negative electrospray ionisation mode (S10 and S11 Figs). Anthrone natural products have previously been shown to form their cognate anthraquinone or dianthrone either enzymatically or via spontaneous oxidation [23]. Should the trihydroxylated anthrone follow the same oxidation pathways in E. coli, or during the extraction process, masses corresponding to AQ256 and 1,3,8-trihydroxydianthrone (Fig 2, compounds 1 and 13) would be expected. Both oxidised metabolites were identified and characterised. This targeted search led to the observation of AQ256 as the major product of the extended anthraquinone BGC (Fig 5, S10 Fig), which was fully characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (S14 Fig) where NMR spectra are consistent with existing literature [24], high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem MS (MS-MS), where fragmentation patterns for AQ256 follow those of other anthraquinones (S10 Fig), and UV-visible (UV-Vis) absorbance in agreement with similar anthraquinones (λmax: 244, 265, 284, and 434 nm) (S15 Fig). From a large-scale cultivation of E. coli BL21(DE3) harbouring plasmid with the entire anthraquinone cluster-pACYCAnthraquinone, grown in 6 L of lysogeny broth (LB) medium, 15 mg of pure (>95%) AQ256 was obtained, corresponding to a production yield of approximately 2.5 mg/L. Interestingly, while quinone formation is proposed to be catalysed by the plu0947 gene product in P. luminescens TT01 [18], the absence of plu0947, ActVA-ORF5/ActVB, or ActVA-ORF6 homologues within the E. coli BL21 genome indicates that the quinone-forming oxygen is either introduced by an unknown alternative endogenous enzyme or through nonenzymatic oxidation as proposed for cladofulvin biosynthesis [23]. More extensively modified anthraquinones isolated from P. luminescens TT01 [18] were not identified as end compounds in the engineered E. coli strains, consistent with the absence of additional cognate tailoring enzymes.
Masses corresponding to two 1,3,8-trihydroxy-dianthrones were also identified and characterised by high-resolution MS (S10 Fig). MS-MS spectra of both dianthrones show fragmentation to occur at the C10 − 10′ bond forming anthrone radicals (S2 Text, S13 Fig): a hallmark fragmentation pattern of a wide variety of glycosylated and aglycone dianthrones [25]. Additionally, the UV-Vis absorbance spectra of both putative dianthrones showed similarities to emodin dianthrone [26, 27] with λmax at 359, 263, and 217 nm and λmax at 358 and 275, respectively (S13 Fig). It is plausible that the 2 metabolites correspond to trans and meso dianthrones; however, full characterisation by NMR was not possible because neither compound was present in sufficient quantities.
Evaluation of a plug-and-play scaffold
Complementation of the C9-KR
A biosynthetic route to 2 pharmaceutically important octaketide scaffolds—anthraquinones and dianthones—was now established using type II PKSs in E. coli; however, to generate large libraries of aromatic polyketide derivatives, a plug-and-play scaffold is necessary, in which functionally diverse biosynthetic genes from a range of phylogenetically distant organisms can be substituted and added successfully (Fig 2B).
During aromatic polyketide biosynthesis, the growing polyketide chain is tethered to an ACP, in this case AntF. To reach compound maturation, the ACP-tethered polyketide chain must be sequentially delivered to enzymes within the biosynthetic pathway (Fig 1); this is facilitated by specific protein–protein interactions. Therefore, for a plug-and-play platform to function, AntF must successfully form these interactions with a multitude of non–cluster-associated tailoring enzymes [28]. The promiscuity of AntF is therefore the major bottleneck and the key determinant in the success of the AntA-I cluster as a generic platform for aromatic polyketide derivatisation in E. coli.
To elucidate whether uncommon ACP characteristics hamper AntF from functioning outside of the ant BGC, the cluster-associated KR, AntA, was functionally replaced with ActIII, a C9-KR homologue from the phylogenetically distant Streptomyces coelicolor actinorhodin (act) BGC. Two vectors comprising the ant cluster but lacking antA were constructed; the first replaced antA with a fully refactored actIII using E. coli codon preference, and the second harboured a modified wild-type actIII with two 5′ synonymous mutations, C to G (6th nucleotide from ATG) and G to C (9th nucleotide from ATG), which has been shown to express successfully in E. coli previously [29].
Substitution of antA with actIII restored the wild-type phenotype and AQ256 production in E. coli BL21 when expressed from either refactored or wild-type actIII gene sequences (Fig 6A), whilst removal of antA abolished AQ256 biosynthesis (Fig 6A, S16 Fig), indicating that AntF successfully delivers biosynthetic intermediates to and from ActIII in vivo and that there are no uncommon ACP characteristics that hamper AntF from functioning outside of the ant BGC. Furthermore, no moonlighting activity from other biosynthetic enzymes or E. coli endogenous KRs was observed. Moreover, in the ΔantA host, the expected shunt metabolites SEK4 and SEK4b accumulated at much higher intensities compared to cultures expressing the entire gene cluster when normalised to final cell density consistent with a C9-KR metabolic bottleneck (S16 Fig).
Cyclase/aromatase complementation
In addition to functionally replacing AntA by ActIII, the enzymatic function of the structurally unique tridomain cyclase/aromatase, AntH, was successfully substituted by the well-characterised didomain cyclase ActVII, from the act BGC. Two additional constructs were built following the same strategy as the KR replacement such that the first construct substituted antH with a refactored actVII and the second with wild-type actVII.
Functional replacement of AntH by ActVII (derived from either the refactored or wild-type actVII) restored AQ256 biosynthesis, not observed in the ΔantH host (Fig 6B, S17 Fig) evidencing the promiscuity of AntF to interface with structurally different enzymes in vivo. Interestingly, in both ActVII complemented strains actinorhodin shunt metabolites aloesaponarin II and 3,8-dihydroxy-methylanthraquinone carboxylic acid (DMAC) were also observed (Fig 6B, S17 Fig). Identification of all 3 end products indicates that the maturing polyketide chain successfully undergoes congruent reduction, aromatisation, and cyclisation to form a common bicyclic intermediate before differing in mechanism of chain release and final ring cyclisation. Deletion of antI, the hydrolase/peptidase, proposed to be involved in acyl-ACP release or final ring formation, confirmed this observation. E. coli deficient in the AntI, but expressing antA-H, no longer produced AQ256 but rather produced aloesaponarin II and DMAC as end products (Fig 6C). This concludes AntI to be the branch point between anthraquinone and dianthrone formation and BIQ biosynthesis. The use of this truncated ant BGC supplementated with late BIQ biosynthetic enzymes, might produce actinorhodin, granaticin and other BIQs in E. coli.
Expanding the aromatic polyketide chemical space accessible in E. coli
The ability to functionally substitute primary tailoring enzymes in a plug-and-play fashion is an important step to test the robustness of the anthraquinone-derived biosynthetic pathway; however, the chemical space accessible in doing so is well-trodden and modest [30]. To exemplify the wider utility of the AntA-I plug-and-play scaffold, we used previously characterised secondary tailoring enzymes to produce new compounds. P. luminescens TT01 produces a suite of modified anthraquinone in addition to AQ256 [18], the majority of which comprise C1 or C3 methoxy groups. The methyltransferase(s) performing these reactions remain unknown. We used an O-methyltransferase (ifmt) from Medicago truncatula in an attempt to complement C1 or C3 O-methylation in E. coli; however, this resulted in biosynthesis of a new C8 methoxy-substituted compound, 1,3-dihydroxy-8-methoxyanthraquinone, named neomedicamycin (Fig 7, S3 Text, S17 and S18 Figs). E. coli BL21(DE3) harbouring antA-I and ifmt was grown in 4.8 L of LB for large-scale neomedicamycin production and approximately 0.5 mg of purified product, corresponding to an obtained production yield of 1.04 mg/L. Neomedicamycin was characterised by UV-Vis spectroscopy, high-resolution MS, and 1H, correlation spectroscopy (COSY), heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC), and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) NMR spectroscopy, and unambiguous assignment of the methoxy group at C8 was facilitated by solving the crystal structure (Fig 7, S3 Text, S18 Fig). To our knowledge, neomedicamycin has not previously been described in nature [31].
Through addition of alternative enzymes to the AntA-I pathway, we also modified AQ256 with the promiscuous flavin-dependent halogenase RadH, from the C. chiversii fungus [32], and formed a monochlorinated AQ256 analogue—1,3,8-trihydroxy-monochloroanthraquinone—as determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy, high-resolution MS and 1H NMR spectroscopy (S19 Fig), which to our knowledge is also a new chemical entity, here named neochaetomycin. E. coli BL21(DE3) harbouring antA-I and radH was grown in 0.15 L of M9 for neochaetomycin isolation and gave a yield of approximately 0.73 mg/L. Chlorinated anthraquinone derivatives are known ATP citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitors, modulating de novo fatty acid synthesis in mammalian cells [33]. ACL up-regulation is observed in cancer cell lines, including chemoresistant colororectal cell lines [34] and cancer stem-like cells [35]; therefore, new chlorinated anthraquinones might be of interest as innovative chemotherapy agents. Furthermore, chlorinated anthraquinones are interesting antibiotic agents. Chloro-emodin shows more potent bactericidal activities against multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens than emodin and matches the activity of some commercially available antibiotics [36]. A biosynthetic route to chloro-emodin is yet to be described: the plug-and-play scaffold described here could easily be used to prototype this.
Discussion
We show that bacterial PKSII systems can be successfully refactored in E. coli. The active expression of bacterial mPKS (KS, CLF, ACP enzymes) was previously not possible in this bioengineering workhorse species. However, by functionally expressing a type II mPKS from P. luminescens in E. coli, we overcome this limitation. We further show that this mPKS can be used in combination with enzymes from actinobacteria, plant, and fungi to produce a diversity of type II polyketides, establishing the general applicability of this platform. Potentially, the 3 other mPKSs described in this manuscript could also be functional as alternative platform PKSs, as we have shown them to be soluble in E. coli as well. As a result, it is no longer necessary to use the intractable mPKSs from actinobacteria when intending to produce type II polyketides in E. coli. Instead, we can now use, e.g., the P. luminescens mPKS to produce type II polyketides in E. coli through a mix-and-match strategy, combining the mPKS platform with tailoring enzymes from actinomycetes and other organisms.
The ability to synthesise aromatic polyketides in E. coli opens up exciting avenues for the rapid and versatile diversification of novel bioactive compounds by prototyping multiple biosynthetic pathways. Through establishing a versatile and robust biosynthetic production line to type II polyketides in E. coli it is now finally possible to perform multiple design–build–test–learn iterations for this system in a highly automated fashion—this was previously unachievable in often poorly characterised, and genetically intractable, native Actinobacterial hosts [37] from which most type II polyketides are characterised. Generation of a type II PKS exploration system in E. coli facilitates faster polyketide engineering, leading to greater accessible chemical diversity and expediting drug lead identification. Promising biosynthetic pathways can then be refined and translated into optimised bioproduction chassis for commercial exploitation.
Whilst we characterise minimal, native, and extended polyketide biosynthetic pathways in E. coli and produce 2 new chemical entities, the success of this plug-and-play platform is yet to be fully realised; however, it already meets the 2 key criteria for a good drug discovery platform: the underlying enzymology comprises discrete and dissociated biosynthetic parts [38, 39], which are well suited to combinatorial biosynthesis, arguably more so than their type I counterparts. And aromatic polyketides—the products of these pathways—include well-known and diverse bioactive specialised metabolites that are heavily used in the clinic [40, 41]. Furthermore, due to the pharmaceutical importance of aromatic polyketides, a wealth of literature already describes how to modify a variety of facets governing chemical diversity, including polyketide chain length [6], starter unit selection [42], cyclisation patterns [43], and addition, substitution, or deletion of biosynthetic genes in type II BGCs; all of these alterations can now be introduced into E. coli and harnessed for combinatorial exploration using existing high-throughput pathway assembly platforms [44].
By opening the field of type II polyketide biosynthesis to the high-throughput synthetic biology toolbox available in E. coli, and taking advantage of the plug-and-play platform, it is now possible to generate large libraries of chemical diverse aromatic polyketides in a highly automated manner starting from pharmacologically privileged scaffolds holding the potential to unlock new promising bioactivities.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
E. coli DH5α was used for routine cloning and plasmid preparation and maintenance. E. coli BL21(DE3) was used for expression of all recombinant proteins described herein with the exception of AntDE purification, in which E. coli NiCo21(DE3) was used. For protein purification, E. coli NiCo21(DE3) or BL21(DE3) was cultured in LB at 37°C, 180 rpm, supplemented with appropriate antibiotics and induced with isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at OD600 0.5–0.6 before reducing incubation temperature to 16°C for a further 16 h. For compound isolation, E. coli BL21(DE3) was cultured in LB for large-scale production of AQ256 and neomedicamycin, or minimal media as 2 mM MgSO4, 100 μM CaCl2, 238.8 μM Na2HPO4, 110.2 μM KH2PO4, 93.47 μM NH4Cl, 42.78 μM NaCl, 0.4% glucose in distilled H2O with appropriate antibiotics. Cultures were incubated at 37°C, 180 rpm, to OD600 0.35–0.4 and induced with 50 μM IPTG, for AQ256 and octaketide shunt metabolites before reducing the incubation temperature to 20°C for 3 to 5 d. P. luminescens TT01 was kindly provided by Dr. Ralf Heermann of Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich. P. luminescens TT01 cultures were inoculated in casein-peptone soymeal-peptone broth and routinely grown at 28°C. Working antibiotic concentrations were as follows: carbenicillin: 50 μg ml−1; kanamycin: 25 μg ml−1; and chloramphenicol: 25 μg ml−1.
DNA isolation
Genomic DNA (gDNA) from P. luminescens TT01 and S. coelicolor M145 was isolated from cultures grown to an OD600 of 1 and OD450 of 0.8, respectively, using a standard phenol chloroform DNA purification protocol and validated using routine PCR amplification. All primers used in this study are detailed in S4 Table. All vectors used in this study are listed in S5 Table. CloneAmp HiFi PCR Premix (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan) was used for all routine PCR amplification; for PCR products over 10 Kb PrimeSTAR Max DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Kusatsu, Japan) was used. All PCR products and restriction endonuclease (RE) digests were purified using the MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as per manufacturer instructions. All ligations were performed using the Rapid DNA ligation kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) as described by the manufacturer. All REs used in this study were obtained from New England Biolabs (NEB; Ipswich, MA), and digests were performed for 1 h at 37°C unless stated otherwise.
Plasmid construction and refactoring
To construct the first KS/CLF expression, vector pBbA2K-RFP was digested with EcoRI-HF and XhoI; the larger DNA fragment comprising the vector backbone was PCR purified. Primers EcoRI_Plu_for and Plu4189_XhoI_R were used to amplify a 2,779 bp fragment encoding plu4191, plu4190, and plu4189 from P. luminescens TT01 gDNA by PCR, which was purified as above and ligated into the empty pBbA2k vector using T4 DNA ligase. The same procedure was followed to construct the BBR1 ori, T7 promoter, and ampicillin-resistant backbone mPKS expression vector pBbB1a-plumPKS. Aromatic polyketide KS and CLF genes are almost exclusively translationally coupled, and this is assumed to be the case for plu4191 and plu4190 due to the start:stop codon overlap. Transcriptional coupling has been proposed to colocalise proteins transcribed from the same polycistronic mRNA and may aid dimer formation; as such, the native operon architecture of plu4191, 90, and 89, which is equivalent to KS, CLF, and ACP, respectively, was retained in the pBbA2k expression vector. To construct the his6-AntE and AntD protein purification, vector pETDuet419091 plu4191 was PCR amplified from P. luminescens TT01 gDNA using primers Plu4191_for_BglII and Plu4191_rev_KpnI, purified as above and digested with BglII and KpnI-HF. The digested plu4191 fragment was ligated into pETDuet-1 also digested with BglII and KpnI-HF to form pETDuet4191. Plu4190 was amplified from P. luminescens TT01 gDNA using plu4190_for_EcoRI, which removed the start ATG, and Plu4190_rev_PstI. The fragment was purified as above and digested using EcoRI-HF and PstI-HF before ligating into pETDuetplu4191 linearised with EcoRI-HF and PstI-HF to form the His6-plu4190 fusion vector pETDuetplu419091. To express recombinant AntB and AntG, the PPTase and CoA ligase from the anthraquinone BGC, plu4193, and plu4188 sequences were amplified from P. luminescens TT01 gDNA using primers Plu4193_for_NcoI_untagged, Plu4193_rev_HindIII, Plu4188_for_NdeI, and Plu4188_rev_XhoI, respectively, before purification, digestion with NcoI and HindIII, and NdeI and XhoI correspondingly and ligation into pACYCDuet-1 using appropriate REs to form both pACYCPlu4188 firstly and pACYCPlu418893 subsequently. Neither plu4193 nor plu4188 was tagged. The p15A ori enabled coexpression of AntB and G with the mPKS of pBbB1a-plumPKS.
The entire complement of genes responsible for anthraquinone biosynthesis were cloned into pACYCDuet-1. This enables further plasmids with compatible origins of replication to be easily introduced when derivatising the end compound in a combinatorial fashion. To construct this vector, a fragment comprising plu4192, 93, and 94 was first cloned into pACYCDuet-1 multiple cloning site (MCS)-2 after PCR amplification from P. luminescens TT01 gDNA using primers Plu4194_for_NdeI and Plu4192_rev_XhoI. Both the fragment and pACYCDuet-1 vector were digested with NdeI and XhoI before ligation, as above, to form pACYCDuetPlu4192-94. The 6 remaining genes, plu4186–91, were cloned into pACYCDuet-1 MCS-1 in the same manner except using primers Plu_for_EcoRI and AnthraquinoneBGC_Rev_PstI for the PCR amplification forming the 13.6 Kb pACYCAnthraquinone vector.
To generate the KR complementation vector, the anthraquinone KR, plu4194, was swapped with sco5086, the C9 KR from the actinorhodin BGC; here, pACYCAnthraquinone was linearised with primers KR_Swap_IF and Plu4194_rev_InFusion, which both read outwards of Plu4194 removing most of the plu4194 CDS from the linear vector. The resulting 13.6 Kb fragment was purified by ethanol precipitation. A 767 bp DNA fragment encoding the wild-type sco5086 sequence was PCR amplified from Streptomyces coelicolor M145 using primers Sco5086_for_IF Sco5086_rev_IF introducing 2 synonymous mutations in the 5′ of the sequence. These primers added 15 bps of sequence homologous to each end of the linearised pACYCAnthraΔplu4194 to the sco5086-containing sequence and enabled plasmid construction by In Fusion (Clonetech, Mountain View, CA), as per the manufacturer’s instruction, forming pACYCAntwtKR. The anthraquinone KR, plu4194, and downstream CDS PPTase, plu4193, are transcriptionally coupled with a start-stop codon overlap. The PPTase ribosome binding site, therefore, is within the 3′ end of plu4194; fortuitously, the N-terminal amino acid sequence of both ActIII and AntA are identical. The primer plu4194_rev_InFusion binds a DNA sequence within the region encoding the identical sequence N-terminal amino acid sequence and maintains the putative PPTase Shine-Dalgarno. The same procedure was followed for the introduction of the refactored actinorhodin KR; however, Ref_Sco5086_IF_for and Ref_SCO5086_IF_rev were used as primers to amplify a codon-optimised sco5086 sequence from pG9m-2-ActKRRef to form pACYCAntrefKR. Additionally, pACYCAnthraΔKR was constructed as a KR negative control by linearising pACYCAnthraquinone via PCR as above using primers Plu4194_del_IF_for and KR_Swap_IF_For followed by DNA assembly using NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix (NEB) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The same process was undertaken to construct sco5090 complementation vectors. Once more, pACYCAnthraquinone was linearised with primers plu4187_replace_fw and plu4188_rev both removing plu4187 to form the 12,169 bp linearised vector and purified by ethanol precipitation. A 989 bp DNA fragment encoding the wild-type sco5086 sequence was PCR amplified from S. coelicolor M145 using primers Sco5090_for_IF Sco5090_rev_IF and purified using the MinElute Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) PCR purification kit. The vector pACYCAntwtCYC was subsequently constructed via In Fusion DNA assembly from purified sco5090 DNA fragment and linearised pACYCAnthraΔplu4187. To introduce the refactored actinorhodin CYC/ARO, the same method was followed; however, Ref_Sco5090_IF_for and Ref_Sco5090_IF_rev were used as primers to amplify a codon-optimised sco5090 sequence from pG9m-2-ActARO/CYCRef forming pACYCAntrefCYC/ARO. The sco5090 knockout plasmid pACYCAntΔAntH was generated by linearisation of pACYCAnthraquinone using primers Plu4187_delta_for and Plu4187_delta_rev, purification of the linear DNA fragment by ethanol precipitation, and DNA assembly using In Fusion as described above. Plasmids pACYCAntΔAntC and pACYCAntΔAntI were also generated by linearisation of pACYCAnthraquinone using primers Plu4192Δ_for and Plu4192Δ_rev, and plu4186Δ_for and plu4186Δ_rev, respectively, followed by In Fusion DNA assembly as above. All codon-optimised genes were designed using Gen Optimiser and manufactured by Gen9 (Massachusetts, US).
The gene for IFMT (also known as IOMT 3, SAM dependent isoflavone 7-O-methyltransferase, GenBank: AAY18582.1) from M. truncatula was codon optimised for E.coli expression and synthesised by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ). The synthesised gene was subsequently cloned into a pET28b vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) using NdeI and XhoI restriction sites, resulting in both N- and C-terminal hexa-histidine tagged fusion protein. A pET28b vector that carries radH halogenase gene from C. chiversii (UniPort ID: C5H881) was used for this study. The cloning of radH into pET28b vector has been previously reported [32, 45].
Similar procedures were used to construct the expression plasmids for the uncharacterised KS/CLF pairs, chosen from K. racemifer DSM 44953 (KraA/B), D. acidovorans CCUG 247B (DacA/B), Streptococcus sp. GMD2s (SspA/B), Candidatus D. auxilii (DauA/B), B. endophyticus DSM 13796 (BendA/B), P. luteoviolacea DSM 6061 (PluA/B), Blautia wexlerea DSM 19850 (BweA/B), Gloeocapsa sp. PCC 7428 (GloeA/B), and 2 characterised KS/CLF sequences from S. resistomycificus (RemA/B) and Streptomyces antibioticus ATCC 11891 (OvmP/K) for expression in E. coli. Nucleotide sequences were refactored to achieve a codon adaptation index similar to highly expressed E. coli housekeeping genes using a simulated annealing approach. Refactored nucleotide sequences were verified graphically using the %MinMax Rare Codon Calculator [46]. Unfavourable intragenic alternative start sites were identified using the ribosome binding calculator [47] and substituted manually, where necessary. To future proof the use of the KS/CLF gene sequences as biosynthetic parts, NdeI, BamHI, NcoI, PstI, XbaI, EcoRI, HindIII, NotI, and XhoI RE recognition sites were omitted from each gene sequence.
A synthetic duel KS/CLF expression cassette was designed in silico based upon the pETDuet-1 expression vectors (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) for kraA/B, dauA/B, bendA/B, pluA/B, gloeA/B, bweA/B, and remA/B. In brief, the cassette comprised a His6-ΔMethionine1_CLF fusion gene sequence, designed using the N-terminal hexahistidine tag (MGSSHHHHHHSQDPNS) nucleotide sequence from pETDuet-1, upstream of the standard pETDuet MCS-2 intergenic region, comprising the T7 promoter for MCS-2, the cognate Shine Dalgarno sequence, and NdeI methionine start codon. In frame with NdeI M1 (MSC2) was the cognate KS gene sequence preceded by an N-terminal Strep-II tag (ASWSHPQFEKG) from pET51b (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). The 5′ and 3′ ends of each cassette were flanked by an NcoI and XhoI RE site to facilitate cloning into the expression vector, pETM11-b. All nucleotide sequences were synthesised by GeneArt (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, US). Synthetic operons were cloned directly into pETM11-b by GeneArt, forming a series of pETKS/CLF vectors. Gene synthesis gloeA/B and bweA/B systematically failed. To construct dacA/B, ovmP/K, and sspA/B co-expression vectors, each synthetic gene sequence was amplified from holding vectors pHold[KS/CLF] template DNA by PCR using PCR primers containing RE sites within 5′ overhangs. CloneAmp HiFi PCR premix was used for all PCR reactions (Takara, Kusata, Japan) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. All primers’ annealing temperatures (Ta) were calculated using Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Iowa, US) OligoAnalyser 3.1 (https://eu.idtdna.com/calc/analyzer, 2016/17), with Ta as close to 50°C as possible. Resultant CLF PCR products were flanked by NdeI and XhoI, and KS PCR products were flanked by NdeI and HindIII and were cloned into MCS-1 and MCS-2 of pETDuet expression vectors forming pETDacB, pETDacAB, pETSspA, pETSspAB, pETOvmP, and pETOvmPK. In all expression vectors, the CLF CDSs were fused with an N-terminal hexahistidine tag, with the exception of Ssp-containing vectors, in which the corresponding KS was His-tagged. For ΔKS expression vector construction, GeneArt-cloned pETKS/CLF expression vectors were linearised by PCR, removing the corresponding KR sequence from the amplicon. PCR primers were designed with complementary 20 bp overhangs to facilitate relegation via Gibson DNA Assembly (NEB) or In Fusion HD cloning (Takara, Kusata, Japan) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. All vectors are detailed in S5 Table.
Protein purification and peptide identification
Total cell lysate was extracted from E. coli BL21(DE3) cultures normalised to a total OD600 of 4. Normalised cells were centrifuged at 4,000g, and supernatant was discarded. To lyse cells, 300 μl of BugBuster (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) protein extraction reagent was added to cell pellets and incubated on a rocker for 30 min before centrifugation at 12,000g for 20 min, 4°C. Supernatant was removed from cell debris and designated as soluble cell lysate. Cell pellets were resuspended in equal volumes of BugBuster and designated insoluble cell lysate. For protein purification, 400 mL cultures were typically used and cultured as in the “Bacterial strains and culture conditions” section. Once more, culture supernatant was removed by centrifugation, 4,000g at 4°C for 20 min. E. coli BL21(DE3) cell pellets were resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl [pH 7.4] 5% glycerol [v/v]) supplemented with cOmplete Mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). All buffers were filtered sterilised using a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Merck). Cell suspension was sonicated on ice for 5 min and centrifuged at 12,000g for 25 min, 4°C. Supernatant was removed and centrifuged a second time as above. Supernatant was once more removed and applied to an IMAC column, Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), pre-equilibrated with buffer A. Flow through was collected and reapplied to the IMAC column. The column was washed with 5 × column volumes (CV) of buffer A before sequential 1 CV washes with Buffer A comprising increasing concentrations of imidazole. Typically 20, 50, 200, 400, and 500 mM solutions were prepared and are denoted on each SDS-PAGE gel image accordingly. IMAC columns were re-equilibrated in buffer A before washing in 20% ethanol. The pH of all buffers was calculated at 4°C, and all buffer and protein purification was carried out at 4°C.
Protein purification and peptide identification for AntD/E
His6AntE/D and His6RemB/A heterodimeric complexes were purified from E. coli BL21 NiCo21(DE3), using immobilised metal affinity chromatography in 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM imidazole. His6AntE/D was further purified via anion exchange chromatography using a 6 ml resource Q (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Massachusetts, US) with a linear gradient from 95% to 5% 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) against 50 mM Tris-HCl 1M NaCl at 3 ml min−1. Samples containing His6AntE/D were subsequently separated by size exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 Increase 100/300 GL columns (GE Healthcare) eluted with 1.5 CVs of 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.4) to isolate the complex in its dimeric form. Backbone vectors containing RFP or GFP were used as protein expression induction controls and to monitor protein extraction efficiency throughout.
To visualise protein samples by SDS-PAGE, protein aliquots were added to fresh 2 × Laemmli SDS-PAGE loading dye (4% SDS [w/v], 0.2% bromophenol blue [w/v], 20% glycerol [v/v], and 200 mM dithiothreitol), made up to 15 μl. Samples were boiled for 10 min prior to loading onto 10%–12% SDS-PAGE gels (Biorad, California, US). Gels were run at 250 V as standard in Towbin buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS). PageRule prestained protein ladder (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, US) was used as a molecular weight reference, unless stated otherwise. SDS-PAGE gels were stained using InstantBlue protein stain (Expedeon, Cambridge, UK) before washing with water and visualisation using a Gel Doc EZ system (BioRad, California, US). Corresponding western blots followed the above procedure; however, they were not stained with InstantBlue (Expedeon). Instead SDS-PAGE gels were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using Trans-Blot Turbo transfer packs (BioRad) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. After transfer, SDS-PAGE gels were stained with InstantBlue (Expedeon) to assess protein transfer quality. Nitrocellulose membranes were washed in deionised water for 5 min before transfer to iBind Western system (ThermoFisher Scientific). Western blots were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primary H1029_.02ml monoclonal anti-polyhistidine antibodies produced in mouse were purchased from Sigma (Missouri, US). Primary anti-strep-II monoclonal antibodies produced in mouse (71590-100VG) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Secondary antibodies used throughout were ab216772 goat pAb to mouse IgG, IRDye 800CW.
Protein bands of interest were isolated from polyacrylamide gels, and Coomassie stain was removed through alternating dehydration and hydration steps in 50% acetonitrile and 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate before digestion with MS-grade trypsin (Promega, Wisconsin, US) at 37°C for 20 h. Extracts containing tryptic peptides were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min to remove particulate matter prior to separation and analysis using a C18 column (LC Packings, Acclaim Pep Map 100) and Bruker (Massachusetts, US) Esquire 3000 Plus ion trap mass spectrometer. Analysis was carried out in positive ion mode with an injection volume 20 μl and flow rate of 200 nl min−1 over a gradient of water to 90% acetonitrile both acidified with 0.1% formic acid. Peptide fragments were identified using the Mascot MS/MS ion search software (Matrix Sciences). Mascot MS/MS search results from band 1 (Fig 3, red circle) identified 5 peptide fragments consistent with AntD (FVLGESAFGIPINSLK, LSSGFSGIHSVIVMR, SEDYDSFDFSSAATSVAK, SGAIGQVYGSDGNNKEFVLK, and GAHIYAELAGYASVNNAYHMTDLPADGMAMAR). Similarly, results from band 2 (Fig 3, yellow circle) showed 7 peptide fragments consistent with AntE (LDVDKLDPNR, INEFSNTNQIIIQR, QPGDFSEGAAFLVLEER, IDEFSVYGIVAVEMALK, VVVTGVGAIHPDGNDVTAIK, KIDEFSVYGIVAVEMALK, and RVVVTGVGAIHPDGNDVTAIK). Peptide fragments are identified as [2M+H]+ adducts.
Metabolite extraction and analysis
Both exo- and endo-metabolomes were analysed when elucidating the metabolic profile of E. coli expressing AntA-I, or substitutions of primary tailoring enzymes. For analysis by HPLC and MS, exometabolomes were analysed rather than endometabolomes. For exometabolome preparation, cells were pelleted at 4,000g, 4°C, for 20 min before decanting supernatant and storing on ice. Supernatant was prepared by further centrifugation at 12,000g, 4°C, for 20 min to remove cell debris before filtering through a 0.45 μm pore size filter (Merck Millipore, Massachusetts, US) prior to analytics. For endometabolomes, unbiased metabolite extraction of the cell pellet was done as previously described [48]. In brief, cell pellets were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen before being suspended in 80% MeOH (−48°C). Each sample was subsequently flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and allowed to thaw on ice 3 times. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000g for 20 min at −9°C before decanting the supernatant. The extraction process was repeated 3 times, and the supernatant from each sample was pooled and used to analyse the exometabolome. Metabolites monitored in each experimental analysis include SEK4 (2), SEK4b (3), B26 (4), AUR367 (5), mutactin (6), dehydromutactin (7), SEK34 (8), SEK34b (9), 1,3,8-trihydroxyanthrone (12), 1,3,8-trihydroxydianthrone (13), aloesaponarin II (11), DMAC (10), AQ256 (1), AQ270a and b, AQ284a and b, and AQ300 and AQ314 [18, 20, 20] (structures not shown). To normalise EICs to final culture optical density, extracted ion intensities were divided by the average optical density (OD600) of 3 technical replicates for each sample.
Octaketide shunt metabolite identification using HPLC-ESI-MS
The exometabolome of E. coli expressing antDEF, antDEFB, and antDEFBG were analysed by HPLC-ESI-MS (Waters, Massachusetts, US; Acquity Ultra Performance LC, Thermo Scientific, M Massachusetts, US; LTQ Orbitrap XL). HPLC conditions were as follows: 1 min: isocratic gradient of 5% solvent B; 7 min: linear gradient 70% solvent B; 7.5 min: linear gradient 95% solvent B; 8.5 min: isocratic gradient 95% solvent B; 9 min: linear gradient to 5% B; and 10 min: isocratic gradient of 5% B. Solvents A and B were HPLC grade water and HPLC grade acetonitrile both acidified with 0.1% formic acid using a C18 2.6 μm 2.1 × 100 mm LC column (Phenomenex, Macclesfield, UK) heated to 30°C with a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1. Injection volume of 3 μl was analysed by electrospray injection MS in positive ionisation (ES+) mode with an ESI-HESI source over a mass scan range of 80–1,200 m/z.
Shunt metabolite identification via HPLC-UV-Vis-ESI-MS
Shunt metabolites (2, 3, 6–9) (S2 Text), dianthones (13) (S2 Text), and modified anthraquinones (structures not shown) (S2 Text) were identified using HPLC-UV-Vis-MS (Agilent, California, US; 1100 series LC/MSD trap). HPLC conditions were as follows: 5 min isocratic gradient of 5% solvent B; 30 min linear gradient from 5 to 95% solvent B; 10 min isocratic gradient of 95% solvent B; 5 min linear gradient from 95–5% solvent B; and 10 min isocratic gradient at 5% B using a C18 2.6 μm 2.1 × 100 mm Accucore LC column (ThermoFisher Scientific) heated to 45°C with a flow rate of 0.25 ml min−1. Injection volume of 20 μl was analysed via electrospray injection MS in negative mode.
Actinorhodin KR and CYC complementation and pACYCAntΔ86 analysis via UV-Vis
Biosynthesis of anthraquinone and BIQ production in actinorhodin KR and CYC complementation experiments was monitored at 434 nm using a Shimadzu prominence UFLC RX SPD-20A UV-Vis detector. Metabolites were separated using a 15 min gradient as follows: 5 min isocratic gradient of 5% B; 15 min linear gradient to 95% B; 5 min isocratic gradient at 95% B; 3 min linear gradient to 5% B; and 7 min isocratic gradient at 5% B. HPLC solvents and column are as in Materials and methods.
HPLC high-resolution mass spectrum analysis
All experimental samples described here were principally analysed using HPLC high-resolution MS using the Dionex ultimate 3000 rapid separation HPLC coupled with QExactive plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). HPLC are as follows: 5 min isocratic gradient of 5% solvent B; 15 min linear gradient from 5% to 95% solvent B; 5 min isocratic gradient of 95% solvent B; 3 min linear gradient from 95% to 5% solvent B; and 2 min isocratic gradient at 5% B. Column, column conditions and solvents were as described in Materials and methods but with a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1. The QExactive plus mass spectrometer was operated in both positive and negative ionisation mode using an ESI-HESI source. All mass spectra were recorded using a full mass spectrum scan with data dependent MS-MS (Top5). Full-scan spectra were obtained over a scan range of 80–800 m/z with a resolution of 70,000. A resolution of 17,500 was used for routine MS-MS spectra with a default charge state of 1 and collision-induced dissociation energy at 35 eV. Fragmentation patterns of AQ256, aloesaponarin II, emodin, and chrysophanol (S15 Fig) were analysed using HPLC-tSIM-MS-MS with exact masses detailed in an inclusion list. A resolution of 35,000 was used when recording MS-MS spectra. Default charge state and collision dissociation energy were as described above.
Methodology for mass spectrum data analysis
Mass spectra were recorded in .raw format from all instruments before conversion to .mzML using Proteowizard 3.0.9393 with binary encoding precision of 64-bit, write index, zlib compression, and TPP compatibility selected. Peak picking filters with MS level 1–2 were used as standard. Mass spectra were subsequently analysed using XCMS LC/MS and GC/MS data analysis package [49] using R.
Methodology for characterisation of AQ256 (1,3,8-trihydroxyanthraquinone)
E. coli BL21(DE3) harbouring plasmid with the entire anthraquinone cluster, pACYCAnthraquinone, was grown in 6 L of LB medium for large-scale AQ256 production. The cultures were grown at 37°C, 180 rpm, to OD600 0.35–0.4 and induced with 50 μM IPTG. AQ256 was extracted from both cell pellet and culture supernatant using methanol and diethyl ether, respectively. Extracts were evaporated to dryness under vacuum to give a brown oil, which was suspended in 50% methanol before purification by semi-preparative HPLC. The following eluent system was used: 5% B for 0–10 min; 5%–95% B linear gradient for 10–55 min; 95% B for 55–65 min; 95%–5% B for 65–75 min; and 5% B for 75–85 min with a flow rate of 5 mL/min, where solvents A and B were water and acetonitrile acidified with 0.1% formic acid, respectively. The yellow product-containing fractions were combined and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure before resuspension in 1/10th volume 80% MeOH. Samples were crystallised at 4°C over a period of 48 h; then, the excess solvent was removed. At this point, 15 mg of pure (>95%) AQ256 was obtained, corresponding to a production yield of approximately 2.5 mg/L. The samples were desiccated for 48 h before suspension in deuterated methanol (600 μL, Sigma Aldrich, ≥99.8 atm % D, contains 0.03% [v/v] tetramethylsilane [TMS]) for NMR spectroscopy.
1H and COSY NMR spectroscopy was performed using a 400 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer. 13C, HSQC, and HMBC NMR spectroscopy was performed using an 800 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer (S14 Fig). Compound AQ256 has been reported previously and characterised by 1H NMR spectroscopy [50], although no chemical shift assignments were provided. Therefore, assignment of the peaks has been performed here (assignments given below) using analysis of chemical shifts and coupling constants, in combination with COSY, HSQC, and HMBC NMR data. 1H NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d4) δ ppm: 6.60 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 7.23 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H, H-4), 7.30 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, H-7), 7.71 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H, H-6), and 7.77 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, H-5). 13C NMR (800 MHz, methanol-d4) δ ppm: 107.6 (C-2), 108.8 (C-4), 109.2 (C-13), 115.4 (C-12), 119.1 (C-5), 124.1 (C-7), 133.6 (C-11), 135.5 (C-14), 136.1 (C-6), 162.0 (C-8), 165.4 (C-1), 166.2 (C-3), 181.7 (C-10), and 190.9 (C-9).
UV-Vis spectroscopy of chrysophanol and emodin standards, as well as AQ256, was performed using a Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, California, US), and these are described in S15 Fig.
Methodology for characterisation of neomedicamycin (1,3-dihydroxy-8-methoxyanthraquinone)
Co-expression of the AntA-I pathway with a previous characterised O-methyltransferase (IFMT) from the M. truncatula isoflavone and isoflavanone pathways produced 1,3-dihydroxy-8-methoxyanthraquinone, a new C8 methoxy-substituted anthraquinone, and represents the first demonstration of this enzyme accepting hydroxyl-substituted anthraquinones. The new compound was named neomedicamycin. E. coli BL21(DE3) harbouring antA-I and ifmt was grown in 4.8 L of LB for large-scale neomedicamycin production. The cultures were grown at 37°C, 180 rpm, to OD600 0.35–0.4 and induced with 50 μM IPTG. Neomedicamycin was extracted with 1:1 volume of diethyl ether. The organic phase was visibly yellow and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure and dissolved in 100% methanol before purification by semi-preparative HPLC using a Phenomenex Gemini 5 μ C18 column (250 × 10 mm) with the following eluent: 10% B 0–2 min; 40% B 2–5 min linear gradient; 40% B 5–50 min isocratic gradient; 95% B 50–51 min linear gradient; 95% B 51–58 min isocratic gradient; 10% B 58–59 min linear gradient; and 10% B 59–65 min isocratic gradient with a flow rate of 5 ml/min. Solvents A and B were water and acetonitrile, respectively, both acidified with 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid. The neomedicamycin-containing fractions were combined and then evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure to give approximately 0.5 mg of purified product, corresponding to a neomedicamycin production yield in E. coli of 1.04 mg/L in agreement with integrated peak values from crude extracts. This purified fraction was dissolved in deuterated methanol (600 μL, Sigma Aldrich, ≥99.8 atm % D, contains 0.03% [v/v] TMS) for characterisation by NMR spectroscopy.
NMR spectroscopy was performed on a 400 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer for 1H and COSY NMR spectra, whilst a 500 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer was used to obtain 13C, HSQC, and HMBC NMR spectra (S19 Fig). Assignment of the peaks was performed using analysis of chemical shifts and coupling constants, in combination with COSY, HSQC, and HMBC NMR data. Some expected peaks in the 13C NMR spectrum were too weak to observe and are therefore not assigned. 1H NMR (500 MHz, methanol-d4), δ ppm: 4.02 (s, 3 H, CH3), 6.53 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1 H, H-2), 7.13 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H, H-4), 7.54 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H, H-7), 7.78 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, H-6), and 7.89 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, H-5).
For unambiguous assignment of the structure of neomedicamycin (e.g., the location of the methoxy- group at C8), single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were grown by slow evaporation of a saturated solution of diethyl ether at 4°C. Data for neomedicamycin were collected on a dual source Rigaku FR-X rotating anode diffractometer using MoKα wavelength at 150 K and reduced using CrysAlisPro 171.39.30c. Absorption correction was performed using empirical methods (SCALE3 ABSPACK) based upon symmetry-equivalent reflections combined with measurements at different azimuthal angles. The structure was solved and refined against all F2 values using Shelx-2016 implemented through Olex2 version 1.2.9 [51, 52]. All crystallographic data are detailed in S3 Table and S19 Fig.
Methodology for characterisation of neochaetomycin (1,3,8-trihydroxy-monochloroanthraquinone)
Coexpression the antA-I pathway with a previous characterised flavin-dependant halogenase radH from C. chiversii yielded a new monochlorinated AQ256 derivative, neochaetomycin, and represents the first demonstration of this enzyme accepting hydroxyl-substituted anthraquinones. E. coli BL21(DE3) harbouring antA-I and radH was grown in 0.15 L of M9 for neochaetomycin isolation. Cultures were grown at 37°C, 180 rpm, to OD600 0.35–0.4 and induced with 50 μM IPTG before reducing incubation temperature. Neochaetomycin was extracted using diethyl ether extraction followed by preparative HPLC, using a similar method employed for neomedicamycin but with an extended isocratic gradient of 42% B (as opposed to 40%) to aid peak separation. The neochaetomycin-containing fractions were combined and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure before dissolution in deuterated methanol (600 μL, Sigma Aldrich, ≥99.8 atm % D, contains 0.03% [v/v] TMS) for characterisation by NMR spectroscopy. Approximately 0.73 mg/L of neochaetomycin were produced by the heterologously expressed pathway in E. coli prior to large-scale culture optimisation.
A 600 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer was used to record the 1H NMR spectrum. 1H NMR (600 MHz, methanol-d4), δ ppm: 7.10 (s, 1 H, H-2 or H-4), 7.23 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1 H, H-7), 7.61 (t, J = 7.8 Hz with additional splitting unresolved, 1 H, H-6), and 7.70 (dd, J = 7.6, 0.9 Hz, 1 H, H-5).
Phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequences
Multiple sequence alignments were performed with the Multiple Alignment Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) G-INS-1 progressive method [53]. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were generated, bootstrapped with 500 iterations using MEGA6 [54]. Sequence alignment with protein secondary structures in postscript were visualised using ESPript [55].
Code availability
Scripts used throughout are available upon request.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Ralf Heermann of Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, for kindly providing P. luminescens TT01. We thank Matt Cliff for acquiring high-field NMR spectra. We thank Rainer Breitling for useful discussions and careful comments on the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ACP
acyl carrier protein
- ACL
ATP citrate lyase
- BIQ
benzoisochromanequinone
- BGC
biosynthesis gene cluster
- CLF
chain length factor
- CoA
Coenzyme A
- COSY
correlation spectroscopy
- CV
column volume
- DMAC
3,8-dihydroxy-methylanthraquinone carboxylic acid
- EIC
extracted ion chromatogram
- gDNA
genomic DNA
- His6
6 polyhistidine tag
- HMBC
heteronuclear multiple bond correlation
- HSQC
heteronuclear single quantum correlation
- IMAC
immobilised metal ion affinity chromatography
- IPTG
isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
- KR
ketoreductase; KS, ketosynthase
- LB
lysogeny broth
- LC/MS-MS
liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
- MAFFT
Multiple Alignment Fast Fourier Transform
- MCAT
malonyl-CoA ACP transacylase
- MCS
multiple cloning site
- MIBiG
Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster
- mPKS
minimal polyketide synthase
- NEB
New England Biolabs
- NMR
nuclear magnetic resonance
- NR-PKS
nonreducing fungal PKS
- OD600
optical density measured at 600 nm
- OTC
oxytetracycline
- PKS
polyketide synthase
- PPTase
phosphopantetheinyl transferase
- RE
restriction endonuclease
- SDS-PAGE
sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- Strep-II tag
Streptavidin-II tag
- TMS
tetramethylsilane
- UV-Vis
UV-visible
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
MC was funded by BBSRC DTP studentship BB/J014478/1. AP was funded by the School of Chemistry (UoM) Colloids Endowment Fund, 18022015. BM and JM were funded by (BBSRC: BB/K00199X/1). This is a contribution from the Manchester Centre for Synthetic Biology of Fine and Specialty Chemicals (SYNBIOCHEM) and acknowledges the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for financial support (Grant No. BB/M017702/1). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014. Journal of Natural Products. 2016;79(3):629–61. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055 WOS:000373031200024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Staunton J, Weissman KJ. Polyketide biosynthesis: a millennium review. Natural Product Reports. 2001;18(4):380–416. 10.1039/a909079g WOS:000170086100002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shen B. Polyketide biosynthesis beyond the type I, II and III polyketide synthase paradigms. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2003;7(2):285–95. 10.1016/s1367-5931(03)00020-6 WOS:000182739700018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cummings M, Breitling R, Takano E. Steps towards the synthetic biology of polyketide biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2014;351(2):116–25. WOS:000331783000002. 10.1111/1574-6968.12365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim E, Moore BS, Yoon YJ. Reinvigorating natural product combinatorial biosynthesis with synthetic biology. Nature Chemical Biology. 2015;11(9):649–59. 10.1038/nchembio.1893 WOS:000359954700008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tang Y, Tsai SC, Khosla C. Polyketide chain length control by chain length factor. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125(42):12708–9. 10.1021/ja0378759 WOS:000185990300021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tang Y, Lee TS, Khosla C. Engineered biosynthesis of regioselectively modified aromatic polyketides using bimodular polyketide synthases. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(2):227–38. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020031 WOS:000189314400015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fitzgerald JT, Ridley CP, Khosla C. Engineered biosynthesis of the antiparasitic agent frenolicin B and rationally designed analogs in a heterologous host. Journal of Antibiotics. 2011;64(12):759–62. 10.1038/ja.2011.86 WOS:000298634600001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stevens DC, Conway KR, Pearce N, Villegas-Penaranda LR, Garza AG, Boddy CN. Alternative Sigma Factor Over-Expression Enables Heterologous Expression of a Type II Polyketide Biosynthetic Pathway in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5). 10.1371/journal.pone.0064858 WOS:000319733000102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang WJ, Li YR, Tang Y. Engineered biosynthesis of bacterial aromatic polyketides in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(52):20683–8. 10.1073/pnas.0809084105 WOS:000262092800023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gao X, Wang P, Tang Y. Engineered polyketide biosynthesis and biocatalysis in Escherichia coli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;88(6):1233–42. 10.1007/s00253-010-2860-4 WOS:000284267700002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hillenmeyer ME, Vandova GA, Berlew EE, Charkoudian LK. Evolution of chemical diversity by coordinated gene swaps in type II polyketide gene clusters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015; 112 (45): 13952–13957. 10.1073/pnas.1511688112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Callahan B, Thattai M, Shraiman BI. Emergent gene order in a model of modular polyketide synthases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009; 106 (46): 19410–19415. 10.1073/pnas.0902364106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kohli GS, John U, Dolah FMV, Murray SA. Evolutionary distinctiveness of fatty acid and polyketide synthesis in eukaryotes. The ISME Journal. 2016; 10(8):1877–90. 10.1038/ismej.2015.263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ridley CP, Lee HY, Khosla C. Evolution of polyketide synthases in bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008; 105(12):4595–600. 10.1073/pnas.0710107105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Medema MH, Kottmann R, Yilmaz P, Cummings M, Biggins JB, Blin K, et al. Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster. Nature Chemical Biology. 2015;11(9):625–31. WOS:000359954700003. 10.1038/nchembio.1890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fritzsche K, Ishida K, Hertweck C. Orchestration of Discoid Polyketide Cyclization in the Resistomycin Pathway. J Am Chem Soc. 2008; 130(26):8307–16. 10.1021/ja800251m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brachmann AO, Joyce SA, Jenke-Kodama H, Schwar G, Clarke DJ, Bode HB. A type II polyketide synthase is responsible for anthraquinone biosynthesis in Photorhabdus luminescens. Chembiochem. 2007;8(14):1721–8. 10.1002/cbic.200700300 WOS:000249912100016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Karppinen K, Hokkanen J, Mattila S, Neubauer P, Hohtola A. Octaketide-producing type III polyketide synthase from Hypericum perforatum is expressed in dark glands accumulating hypericins. Febs Journal. 2008;275(17):4329–42. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06576.x WOS:000258287300009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Beld J, Finzel K, Burkart MD. Versatility of Acyl-acyl carrier protein synthetases. Chemistry & Biology. 2014;21(10):1293–9. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.015 WOS:000344521300008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pistorius D, Li Y, Sandmann A, Müller R. Completing the puzzle of aurachin biosynthesis in Stigmatella aurantiaca Sg a15. Molecular BioSystems. 2011;7(12):3308–15. 10.1039/c1mb05328k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sandmann A, Dickschat J, Jenke-Kodama H, Kunze B, Dittmann E, Mueller R. A type II polyketide synthase from the Gram-negative bacterium Stigmatella aurantiaca is involved in aurachin alkaloid biosynthesis. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition. 2007;46(15):2712–6. 10.1002/anie.200603513 WOS:000245614600039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Griffiths S, Mesarich CH, Saccomanno B, Vaisberg A, De Wit P, Cox R, Collemare J. Elucidation of cladofulvin biosynthesis reveals a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase required for anthraquinone dimerization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113(25):6851–6. 10.1073/pnas.1603528113 WOS:000378272400032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang R, Wang T, Xie XS, Ma KX, Fang XW, Wu SH. Secondary Metabolites from an Endophytic Fungus Nigrospora sp. Chemistry of Natural Compounds. 2016;52(4):697–9. 10.1007/s10600-016-1745-x WOS:000379007500029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xu W, Zhang J, Huang ZH, Qiu XH. Identification of new dianthrone glycosides from Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometry detection: a strategy for the rapid detection of new low abundant metabolites from traditional Chinese medicines. Analytical Methods. 2012;4(6):1806–12. 10.1039/c2ay00009a WOS:000304768600055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Falk H, Schoppel G. On the synthesis of hypericin by oxidative trimethyl-emodin anthrone and emodin anthrone dimerization—isohypericin. Monatshefte Fur Chemie. 1992;123(10):931–8. WOS:A1992JQ51200009. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakajima K, Yamauchi K, Kuwano S. Isolation of a new aloe-emodin dianthrone diglucoside from senna and its potentiating effect on the purgative activity of sennoside-a in mice. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1985;37(10):703–6. WOS:A1985ASL6300005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Javidpour P, Bruegger J, Srithahan S, Korman TP, Crump MP, Crosby J, Burkart MD, Tsai SC. The Determinants of Activity and Specificity in Actinorhodin Type II Polyketide Ketoreductase. Chemistry & Biology. 2013;20(10):1225–34. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.07.016 WOS:000326429400008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zawada RJX, Khosla C. Heterologous expression, purification, reconstitution and kinetic analysis of an extended type II polyketide synthase. Chemistry & Biology. 1999;6(9):607–15. WOS:000082542000005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Khosla C, Zawada RJX. Generation of polyketide libraries via combinatorial biosynthesis. Trends in Biotechnology. 1996;14(9):335–41. 10.1016/0167-7799(96)10046-9 WOS:A1996VF73800007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yu J-RaCJ-CaGY-S. The structure correction of “8-hydroxysubspinosin” and synthesis of 5-hydroxydamnacanthol-ω-ethyl ether. Chinese Journal of Chemistry. 1991;9(4):365–72. 10.1002/cjoc.19910090412 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Menon BRK, Brandenburger E, Sharif HH, Klemstein U, Shepherd SA, Greaney MF, et al. RadH: A versatile halogenase for integration into synthetic pathways. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition. 2017;56(39):11841–5. 10.1002/anie.201706342 WOS:000410810600029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Koerner SK, Hanai JI, Bai S, Jernigan FE, Oki MW, Komaba C, Shuto E, Sukhatme VP, Sun L. Design and synthesis of emodin derivatives as novel inhibitors of ATP-citrate lyase. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2017;126:920–8. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.12.018 WOS:000396804600070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhou YF, Bollu LR, Tozzi F, Ye XC, Bhattacharya R, Gao G, Dupre E, Xia L, Lu J, Fan F, Bellister S, Ellis LM, Weihua Z. ATP Citrate Lyase Mediates Resistance of Colorectal Cancer Cells to SN38. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2013;12(12):2782–91. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0098 WOS:000328486600015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hanai JI, Doro N, Seth P, Sukhatme VP. ATP citrate lyase knockdown impacts cancer stem cells in vitro. Cell Death & Disease. 2013;4 10.1038/cddis.2013.215 WOS:000321111700047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li JX, Chen GH, Wu HM, Webster JM. Identification of 2 pigments and a hydroxystilbene antibiotic from Photorhabdus luminescens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1995;61(12):4329–33. WOS:A1995TG91500031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nakashima N, Mitani Y, Tamura T. Actinomycetes as host cells for production of recombinant proteins. Microbial Cell Factories. 2005;4 10.1186/1475-2859-4-7 WOS:000232694300001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shen B. Biosynthesis of aromatic polyketides. Biosynthesis: Aromatic Polyketides, Isoprenoids, Alkaloids. 2000;209:1–51. WOS:000088870100001. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Das A, Khosla C. Biosynthesis of Aromatic Polyketides in Bacteria. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2009;42(5):631–9. 10.1021/ar8002249 WOS:000266238500006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tacar O, Sriamornsak P, Dass CR. Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2013;65(2):157–70. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01567.x WOS:000314212400001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nelson ML, Levy SB. The history of the tetracyclines. In: Bush K, editor. Antimicrobial Therapeutics Reviews: Antibiotics That Target the Ribosome Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1241 Oxford: Blackwell Science Publ; 2011. p. 17–32. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06354.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tang Y, Koppisch AT, Khosla C. The acyltransferase homologue from the initiation module of the R1128 polyketide synthase is an acyl-ACP thioesterase that edits acetyl primer units. Biochemistry. 2004;43(29):9546–55. 10.1021/bi049157k WOS:000222964900027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Metsa-Ketela M, Palmu K, Kunnari T, Ylihonko K, Mantsala P. Engineering anthracycline biosynthesis toward angucyclines. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2003;47(4):1291–6. 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1291-1296.2003 WOS:000181842000017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Carbonell P, Jervis AJ, Robinson CJ, Yan C, Dunstan M, Swainston N, Vinaixa M, Hollywood KA, Currin A, Rattray NJW, Taylor S, Spiess R, Sung R, Williams AR, Fellows D, Stanford NJ, Mulherin P, Le Feuvre R, Barran P, Goodacre R, Turner NJ, Goble C, Chen GG, Kell DB, Micklefield J, Breitling R, Takano E, Faulon JL, Scrutton NS. An automated Design-Build-Test-Learn pipeline for enhanced microbial production of fine chemicals. Communications biology. 2018;1:66 Epub 2018/10/03. 10.1038/s42003-018-0076-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Latham J, Henry JM, Sharif HH, Menon BRK, Shepherd SA, Greaney MF, Micklefield J. Integrated catalysis opens new arylation pathways via regiodivergent enzymatic C-H activation. Nature Communications. 2016;7: 11873 10.1038/ncomms11873 WOS:000378008100001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Clarke TF, Clark PL. Rare Codons Cluster. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(10):5 10.1371/journal.pone.0003412 WOS:000265121800010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Borujeni AE, Channarasappa AS, Salis HM. Translation rate is controlled by coupled trade-offs between site accessibility, selective RNA unfolding and sliding at upstream standby sites. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(4):2646–59. 10.1093/nar/gkt1139 WOS:000332381000053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Muhamadali H, Xu Y, Ellis DI, Allwood JW, Rattray NJW, Correa E, Correa E, Alrabiah H, Lloyd JR, Goodacre R. Metabolic Profiling of Geobacter sulfurreducens during Industrial Bioprocess Scale-Up. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2015;81(10):3288–98. 10.1128/AEM.00294-15 WOS:000353336900002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Smith CA, Want EJ, O'Maille G, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Analytical Chemistry. 2006;78(3):779–87. 10.1021/ac051437y WOS:000235195200033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Grunwell JR, Karipides A, Wigal CT, Heinzman SW, Parlow J, Surso JA, Clayton L, Fleitz FJ, Daffner M, Stevens JE. The formal oxidative addition of electron-rich transoid dienes to bromonaphthoquinones. J Org Chem. 1991;56(1):91–5. 10.1021/Jo00001a020 ISI:A1991EQ97900020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sheldrick GM. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallographica Section C-Structural Chemistry. 2015;71:3–8. 10.1107/s2053229614024218 WOS:000347804100002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dolomanov OV, Bourhis LJ, Gildea RJ, Howard JAK, Puschmann H. OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2009;42:339–41. 10.1107/s0021889808042726 WOS:000264292800029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research. 2002; 30(14):3059–66. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 WOS:000177154300016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30(12):2725–9. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 WOS:000327793000019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Metoz F. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics. 1999;15(4):305–8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.4.305 WOS:000080363400006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ma SM, Zhan JX, Xie XK, Watanabe KJ, Tang Y, et al. (2008) Redirecting the cyclization steps of fungal polyketide synthase. Journal of the American Chemical Society 130: 38–+ 10.1021/ja078091o [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tang Y., Tsai S. C. & Khosla C. Polyketide chain length control by chain length factor. Journal of the American Chemical Society 125, 12708–12709, 10.1021/ja0378759 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.