Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2019 Jun 5;294(29):11144–11153. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009054

Repair and translesion synthesis of O6-alkylguanine DNA lesions in human cells

Hua Du 1, Pengcheng Wang 1, Lin Li 1, Yinsheng Wang 1,1
PMCID: PMC6643039  PMID: 31167778

Abstract

O6-alkyl-2′-deoxyguanosine (O6-alkyl-dG) lesions are among the most mutagenic and prevalent alkylated DNA lesions that are associated with cancer initiation and progression. In this study, using a shuttle vector–based strand-specific PCR-competitive replication and adduct bypass assay in conjunction with tandem MS for product identification, we systematically assessed the repair and replicative bypass of a series of O6-alkyl-dG lesions, with the alkyl group being a Me, Et, nPr, iPr, nBu, iBu, or sBu, in several human cell lines. We found that the extent of replication-blocking effects of these lesions is influenced by the size of the alkyl groups situated on the O6 position of the guanine base. We also noted involvement of distinct DNA repair pathways and translesion synthesis polymerases (Pols) in ameliorating the replication blockage effects elicited by the straight- and branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions. We observed that O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase is effective in removing the smaller alkyl groups from the O6 position of guanine, whereas repair of the branched-chain lesions relied on nucleotide excision repair. Moreover, these lesions were highly mutagenic during cellular replication and exclusively directed G→A mutations; Pol η and Pol ζ participated in error-prone bypass of the straight-chain lesions, whereas Pol κ preferentially incorporated the correct dCMP opposite the branched-chain lesions. Together, these results uncover key cellular proteins involved in repair and translesion synthesis of O6-alkyl-dG lesions and provide a better understanding of the roles of these types of lesions in the etiology of human cancer.

Keywords: DNA damage, DNA polymerase, DNA replication, mutagenesis, mutagenesis mechanism, carcinogenesis, DNA adduct, MS, O6-alkylguanine lesion, translesion synthesis

Introduction

Highly efficient and accurate DNA replication, which is critical for maintaining normal cellular functions, can be compromised by DNA damage (1). Many exogenous and endogenous agents can react with DNA to induce DNA damage, and alkylation constitutes a major and diverse type of DNA damage (2). Among the four exocyclic oxygen atoms of nucleobases, the O6 position of guanine is the most facile site to be alkylated (3). Appreciable levels of O6-alkyl-2′-deoxyguanosine (O6-alkyl-dG)2 could be detected in human tissues (4, 5). Moreover, O6-alkyl-dG lesions alter the hydrogen-bonding property of the guanine base and give rise to high frequencies of G→A mutations; hence, these lesions are thought to be involved in the initiation and progression of human cancer (6, 7).

Cells are equipped with multiple mechanisms to repair the O6-alkylguanine lesions. In this vein, human O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT) can directly transfer alkyl groups from the O6 position of guanine to Cys-145 in the protein, which leads to irreversible inactivation of MGMT (810). Therefore, the amount of active MGMT limits the capacity of cells to repair O6-alkyl-dG lesions (11, 12). In addition, the efficiency of MGMT-mediated repair of O6-alkyl-dG lesions decreases with the size of the alkyl groups (10, 13). Apart from direct lesion reversal, nucleotide excision repair (NER) is thought to be the predominant pathway for repairing bulky O6-alkyl-dG adducts (7, 14).

Despite the presence of multiple DNA repair pathways, some DNA lesions evade repair and may stall replicative DNA polymerases (15, 16). Sustained stalling can result in replication fork collapse, which may give rise to DNA double-strand breaks, leading to genomic instability (17). To overcome the replication blockage effects of DNA lesions, mammalian cells have at least seven proteins with substantial translesion synthesis (TLS) activity that can synthesize DNA past the damaged nucleosides. These include four Y-family polymerases (Pol η, Pol ι, Pol κ, and REV1), one B-family polymerase (Pol ζ), and two A-family polymerases (Pol θ and Pol ν) (1822). TLS polymerases, despite being capable of employing damaged DNA as a template, often exhibit relatively low selectivity in nucleotide insertion and lack proofreading 3′→5′ exonuclease activities, which sometimes lead to significantly diminished fidelity and give rise to mutations in the genome (15, 23).

Several previous studies characterized the biological consequences of O6-alkyl-dG lesions in Escherichia coli and mammalian cells (2426). Although both O6-methyl-dG (O6-Me-dG) and O6-ethyl-dG (O6-Et-dG) may exert cytotoxic effects via mismatch repair-induced double-strand breaks (26), they do not significantly block DNA synthesis (27, 28). On the other hand, bulkier O6-alkyl-dG lesions, including O6-benzyl-dG (O6-Bz-dG) and O6-4-(3-pyridyl)-4-oxobut-1-yl-dG (O6-POB-dG), strongly impede DNA replication (29). Unrepaired O6-alkyl-dG lesions also display strong miscoding potential during DNA replication and induce almost exclusively the G→A transition mutation (3, 26).

Unlike the extensively studied O6-Me-dG and O6-Et-dG, the biological effects of bulkier O6-alkyl-dG lesions are less well understood, despite the fact that the latter lesions are detectable in tissue DNA of animals after exposure to N-nitroso compounds (3032). For instance, O6-butyl-dG (O6-Bu-dG) and O6-(4-hydroxybutyl)-dG lesions have been detected in tissues of animals upon treatment with N-nitrosobutyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)amine (30). Moreover, the bulky O6-POB-dG lesion is closely associated with lung tumorigenesis induced by a tobacco carcinogen, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (33, 34). To achieve a better understanding of the impact of various O6-alkyl-dG lesions on carcinogenesis, we comprehensively investigated how the size and shape of the substituent groups (Fig. 1) located at the major-groove O6 position of guanine modulate their repair and replicative bypass in human cells. We also examined the roles of DNA repair pathways and TLS polymerases in modulating the replicative bypass of O6-alkyl-dG lesions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The O6 substituted dG lesions investigated in this study. dR, 2-deoxyribose.

Results

In this study, we employed a previously published shuttle vector–based SSPCR-CRAB assay (35) (Fig. S1) along with the restriction digestion and post-labeling method (Fig. 2A), to examine the core repair and lesion bypass machineries that counteract the adverse biological effects conferred by O6-alkyl-dG lesions and to unveil how the size and shape of an alkyl group influence the repair and replicative bypass of these lesions in human cells. In particular, we examined the roles of MGMT and NER in repairing these lesions, assessed the replication blockage and mutagenic effects of these lesions, and investigated how replication across these lesions is modulated by TLS DNA polymerases.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The influence of MGMT and NER on the bypass efficiency and mutation frequency of O6-alkyl-dG lesions. A, digestion of PCR amplicons using NcoI and SfaNI restriction endonucleases, followed by a post-labeling assay. B, representative gel image showing the NcoI/SfaNI-produced restriction fragments of interest. C and D, the bypass efficiencies (C) and mutation frequencies (D) of each lesion in human skin fibroblasts. *, 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; **, 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. The p values were calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

Impact of O6-alkyl-dG lesions on the efficiency and fidelity of DNA replication in human cells

Our results from replication studies with the use of double-stranded, lesion-containing plasmids showed that the size and shape of the alkyl groups located at the O6 position of guanine exert some effects on replication efficiency. O6-Me-dG did not disrupt DNA replication, whereas reduced bypass efficiencies were observed for other O6-alkyl-dG lesions. In general, the bypass efficiencies decreased with the size of the alkyl group (Fig. 2, B and C and Fig. S2). In addition, all branched-chain lesions are more blocking to DNA replication than their straight-chain counterparts (Fig. 2C).

Our results also showed that all O6-alkyl-dG lesions directed exclusively G→A mutation at high frequencies, indicating the unique miscoding attribute of this type of lesion. O6-Me-dG and O6-Et-dG induced more than 60% of G→A transitions, which is relatively higher than other O6-alkyl-dG lesions (Fig. 2D and Fig. S2). Moreover, the G→A mutation frequency of these lesions decreases with increasing size of the alkyl groups (from O6-nPr-dG to O6-sBu-dG).

Distinct roles of MGMT and NER in repairing straight-chain versus branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions

MGMT is the key repair protein that directly removes alkyl groups from the O6 site of guanine (13). We found that treatment of cells with O6-BG (an MGMT-specific inhibitor) led to slightly reduced bypass efficiencies for all straight-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions except O6-nBu-dG (Fig. 2, B and C). However, depletion of MGMT only slightly elevated the O6-Me-dG-induced G→A mutation, but no significant change was observed for other lesions (Fig. 2D and Fig. S3). In contrast, neither the bypass efficiencies nor mutation frequencies of any of the branched-chain lesions were affected by the inactivation of MGMT (Fig. 2, C and D), suggesting a lack of involvement of MGMT in repairing these lesions.

Apart from the MGMT protein, several studies indicated robust repair of O6-alkyl-dG by NER (14, 36). Therefore, we next examined whether the size and shape of the alkyl group influence the efficiency of NER-mediated repair of these lesions. To this end, we employed xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A (XPA)-deficient GM04429 and repair-proficient GM00637 human skin fibroblasts for a replication experiment. Deficiency in XPA led to marginal reduction in the bypass efficiency of O6-nPr-dG and O6-nBu-dG, whereas no appreciable change in bypass efficiency was observed for O6-Me-dG or O6-Et-dG (Fig. 2C). Moreover, depletion of NER did not affect the mutation frequency for any of these lesions (Fig. 2D). Removal of MGMT in an XPA-deficient background further attenuated the bypass efficiency for O6-Me-dG and O6-Et-dG but not for O6-nPr-dG or O6-nBu-dG (Fig. 2C), confirming the capability of MGMT to repair the smaller O6-alkyl-dG lesions.

In contrast to the straight-chain lesions, loss of the NER pathway resulted in pronounced decreases in bypass efficiency and increases in mutation frequency for branched-chain lesions (Fig. 2, C and D). Moreover, elimination of MGMT in XPA-deficient cells did not give rise to any apparent changes in bypass efficiency or mutation frequency of these lesions (Fig. 2, C and D). These observations indicate that, although MGMT can effectively remove smaller straight-chain adducts (i.e. methyl and ethyl) from the O6 position of guanine, repair of branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions relies heavily, if not exclusively on the NER pathway.

Involvement of various TLS polymerases in bypassing O6-alkyl-dG lesions

TLS polymerases assume important roles in bypassing lesions that block replicative polymerases. By employing an SSPCR-CRAB assay (Fig. 3, A and B, and Fig. S1), HEK293T cells, and isogenic cells where TLS polymerase was genetically ablated, we explored the individual or combined roles of various TLS polymerases in bypassing O6-alkyl-dG lesions (37, 38). O6-Me-dG is unique in that no alteration in bypass efficiency was observed upon knockout of any TLS polymerases. Depletion of REV1 significantly decreased the bypass efficiency of all other O6-alkyl-dG lesions, which is in agreement with the notion that REV1 plays an indispensable role as a scaffolding component for Y-family TLS polymerases (39, 40). In addition, individual ablation of Pol η or Pol ζ conferred a pronounced reduction in bypass efficiency for all straight-chain lesions except O6-Me-dG (Fig. 3C and Fig. S2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Restriction digestion and post-labeling method for determining the bypass efficiency and mutation frequency of O6-alkyl-dG lesions in HEK293T cells and isogenic TLS polymerase–deficient cells. A, digestion of PCR products using NcoI and SfaNI restriction endonucleases and post-labeling assay. B, representative gel image showing the NcoI/SfaNI-produced restriction fragments of interest. The standard synthetic ODN representing the restriction fragment arising from the competitor vector (i.e. 5′-CATGGCGATATGCTGT-3′) is designated 16-mer; 13-mer A, 13-mer G, 13-mer T, and 13-mer C designate the standard synthetic ODNs 5′-CATGGCGMGCTGT-3′, where M is A, G, T, and C, respectively. p* indicates a 32P-labeled phosphate group. C and D, the bypass efficiencies (C) and mutation frequencies (D) of O6-alkyl-dG lesions were calculated based on densitometry analysis of the corresponding gel bands. The data represent the means and standard deviations of results from three independent replication experiments. *, 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; **, 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. The p values were calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

Translesion bypass of the branched-chain lesions is more complex. Loss of all TLS polymerases except Pol ζ led to diminished bypass efficiency for O6-iPr-dG and O6-iBu-dG, whereas depletion of Pol η, ι, κ, or ζ alone did not change the bypass efficiency for O6-sBu-dG (Fig. 3C). It is interesting to note that genetic ablation of Pol ζ did not elicit any alterations in the bypass efficiency for any of the branched-chain lesions. Previous studies indicated that Pol ζ predominantly serves as an “extender” during lesion bypass (41, 42); therefore, we postulate that this polymerase may not be effective in extending the nascent strand following nucleotide insertion opposite the branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions.

The above observations suggested cooperative and redundant roles of TLS polymerases in bypassing the O6-alkyl-dG lesions. We further extended the study to the use of Pol η/Pol ζ– and Pol ι/Pol κ–deficient cells. The bypass efficiency of O6-Et-dG, O6-nPr-dG, and O6-nBu-dG in Pol η/Pol ζ–deficient cells was almost identical to that in Pol η-deficient cells (Fig. 4A), indicating that Pol η and Pol ζ may act sequentially to bypass the straight-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions. On the other hand, simultaneous removal of Pol ι and Pol κ resulted in lower bypass efficiencies for the branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions relative to depletion of either polymerase (Fig. 4B and Fig. S2). Both polymerases were found to be effective in incorporating nucleotides opposite a variety of DNA lesions (4244), whereas Pol κ can also exert an extension role in lesion bypass (45, 46). Therefore, we propose that Pol ι and Pol κ may function separately in bypassing branched-chain lesions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The bypass efficiency and mutation frequency of O6-alkyl-dG lesions in HEK293T cells and isogenic cells where TLS polymerases were ablated individually or in combination. The data of the single-knockout cells are replotted from the data in Fig. 3 to better compare the results obtained from single-polymerase knockout cells with those from the corresponding double-knockout cells. A–D, bypass efficiency (A and C) and frequency of the G→A mutation (B and D) observed for the O6-alkyl-dG lesions. *, 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; **, 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; n.s., not significant (p > 0.05). The p values were calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.

The fidelity of TLS polymerases in bypassing O6-alkyl-dG lesions

Although genetic ablation of Pol η led to significantly reduced bypass efficiency for O6-Et-dG, loss of this polymerase did not alter the mutation frequency of O6-Et-dG, suggesting that Pol η and other polymerases have similar fidelity in nucleotide insertion opposite O6-Et-dG. In contrast, loss of Pol η or Pol ζ significantly decreased the mutation frequency of O6-nPr-dG and O6-nBu-dG (Fig. 3D and Fig. S2), revealing that these two TLS polymerases promote error-prone bypass of the larger straight-chain lesions. No further diminution in mutation frequency was observed upon dual depletion of Pol η and Pol ζ (Fig. 4C), supporting cooperative roles of the two TLS polymerases in inaccurate bypass of O6-nPr-dG and O6-nBu-dG.

Although the absence of Pol ι or Pol κ did not result in any alteration in mutagenic properties for the straight-chain lesions, genetic ablation of Pol ι diminished the mutation frequency of O6-iPr-dG, O6-iBu-dG, and O6-sBu-dG, underscoring the role of Pol ι in misincorporating dTMP opposite the branched-chain lesions. However, elevated mutation frequencies were detected upon depletion of Pol κ (Fig. 3D and Fig. S2), reflecting the higher accuracy of Pol κ compared with other TLS polymerase(s) in bypassing branched-chain lesions. Interestingly, the mutation frequency of the three branched-chain lesions in Pol ι/Pol κ–deficient cells returned to a similar level as in HEK293T cells (Fig. 4D).

Removal of REV1 resulted in markedly attenuated G→A mutation frequencies for the larger O6-alkyl-dG lesions (from O6-nPr-dG to O6-sBu-dG) (Fig. 3D and Fig. S2), which parallels the bypass efficiency results. Upon loss of the core TLS machinery, rescue of lesion-induced replication blockage effects may predominantly rely on the repair pathway, which leads to an appreciable decline in bypass efficiency and mutation frequency. In addition, we observed that mutation frequency decreased with the size of the alkyl groups in O6-alkyl-dG lesions. The finding suggested that O6-alkyl-dG lesions could be inaccurately bypassed by the polymerases we studied or by other TLS polymerases (i.e. Pol θ and Pol ν), whereas the larger lesions are more blocking and are therefore less mutagenic.

Discussion

Genomic DNA is under constant attack by both exogenous and endogenous genotoxic agents, which may modify the chemical structure of DNA to yield various DNA lesions (47). DNA lesions may perturb the efficiency and fidelity of DNA replication, compromising genome integrity. Some specialized repair proteins and TLS polymerases can protect cells by mitigating the deleterious effects conferred by DNA lesions (48, 49), whereas dysregulation of these systems may result in cell death, mutations, and even cancer (50).

Previous studies revealed the prevalence of O6-alkyl-dG lesions in cells and tissues of animals upon exposure to alkylating agents (51). In this study, we examined systematically how a series of O6-alkyl-dG lesions with varying sizes (from methyl to butyl) and structures (n- and isopropyl; n-, iso-, or sec-butyl) of the alkyl groups perturb the efficiency and accuracy of DNA replication in human cells. Our findings unveiled the involvement of distinct pathways in repairing and bypassing straight- versus the branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions.

We observed significant replication blockage effects for all O6-alkyl-dG lesions except O6-Me-dG in human cells, with branched-chain lesions exerting stronger blockage effects than their straight-chain counterparts. In addition, all of these lesions induced a high frequency of G→A mutations (Figs. 2D and 3D). Both the bypass efficiency and mutation frequency dropped with the size of the alkyl group. These observations parallel previous findings (37, 52) and support the hypothesis that adduct size and shape can pronouncedly influence the efficiency of DNA replication.

The differences in repairing straight- and branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions

Several studies showed efficient repair of O6-Me-dG and O6-Et-dG lesions by MGMT in mammalian cells (14, 53). We found that treatment of cells with O6-BG, an MGMT inhibitor (54), led to moderate decreases in bypass efficiency for most straight-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions but not for any of the branched-chain lesions (Fig. 2C). The observations are in accordance with previous findings that the binding activity and repair rate of MGMT decreased with the size of the adduct on the O6 position of guanine (55, 56). Although previous studies have suggested branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions to be poor but potential substrates for MGMT (31, 57, 58), our results indicated that MGMT lacks the ability to repair these lesions in human cells.

Previous studies have suggested the involvement of NER in repair of the bulkier O6-alkyl-dG lesions (14, 59). We observed decreased bypass efficiency and elevated mutation frequency for all branched-chain lesions in XPA-deficient cells relative to repair-competent human skin fibroblasts, whereas loss of NER had a minimal impact on straight-chain lesions (Fig. 2, C and D). These results, therefore, furnished experimental evidence to support the role of NER in removing the branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions in mammalian cells. Interestingly, we observed that depletion of MGMT led to increased bypass efficiency for O6-nBu-dG in repair-proficient cells but not in cells deficient in XPA (Fig. 2C). Inappropriate substrate binding by MGMT has been shown previously to impede NER repair (60); hence, this result suggests that MGMT binding may shield O6-nBu-dG from NER.

Requirement of various TLS Pols in bypassing O6-alkyl-dG lesions

Our replication studies using polymerase-deficient cells revealed the roles of various TLS polymerases in bypassing the O6-alkyl-dG lesions. Unlike O6-Me-dG, where loss of any TLS polymerase(s) did not exert any appreciable effect on its bypass efficiency, bypass of other bulkier O6-alkyl-dG lesions is substantially modulated by TLS polymerases. Thus, our results confirmed the previous finding that O6-Me-dG can be readily bypassed in mammalian cells (61).

We found that REV1 is involved in bypassing all lesions except O6-Me-dG (Fig. 3C), which is in line with the fact that REV1 can act as a scaffold protein in supporting the TLS mediated by other Y-family polymerases, including Pol η, Pol ι, and Pol κ (39, 40). We also observed that Pol η participated in bypassing most of the O6-alkyl-dG lesions (Fig. 3C), which is consistent with the results from the in vitro biochemical assay showing Pol η to be the most efficient TLS polymerase in nucleotide incorporation opposite O6-alkyl-dG (29). Moreover, genetic ablation of Pol ζ led to reduced bypass efficiency for the straight-chain O6-Et-dG, O6-nPr-dG, and O6-nBu-dG, albeit to lower degrees than observed for Pol η-deficient cells. Further depletion of Pol ζ in the Pol η-deficient background did not elicit any further diminutions in bypass efficiency (Fig. 4A), underscoring the key role of Pol η in bypassing straight-chain lesions. In light of previous findings regarding the sequential actions of TLS polymerases in lesion bypass (42, 62), we postulate that Pol η may incorporate a nucleotide opposite straight-chain lesions, which is followed by extension of the nascent strand by Pol ζ or other polymerases (e.g. Pol κ).

Different from what we observed regarding the roles of Pol η and Pol ζ in promoting efficient bypass of straight-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions, Pol ι or Pol κ appear to be important in bypassing branched-chain O6-iPr-dG and O6-iBu-dG lesions. Previous studies revealed functions of Pol ι and Pol κ in supporting accurate bypass of minor-groove N2-dG lesions in mammalian cells (63, 64). Our results showed that concurrent removal of Pol ι and Pol κ conferred a more pronounced reduction in the bypass efficiency of O6-iPr-dG, O6-iBu-dG, and O6-sBu-dG than depletion of either polymerase alone, indicating separate roles of these two polymerases in bypassing branched-chain lesions. The observation is reminiscent of other studies showing different activities of Pol ι and Pol κ in translesion synthesis of cis,syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (65) and abasic sites (66).

Impact of TLS Pols in modulating the mutagenic properties of O6-alkyl-dG lesions

Our study also revealed roles of TLS polymerase in influencing the mutagenic potentials of O6-alkyl-dG lesions. Along this line, Choi et al. (67) reported error-free bypass of O6-alkyl-dG lesions by recombinant human REV1, which was attributed to its unique dCMP transferase activity. However, we found that loss of REV1 conferred a pronounced decrease in G→A mutation frequency for all O6-alkyl-dG lesions except O6-Me-dG and O6-Et-dG (Fig. 3D). This finding, therefore, suggests that REV1 may not assume a catalytic role in nucleotide incorporation opposite the lesion.

Loss of Pol η or Pol ζ led to markedly diminished G→A mutation for O6-nPr-dG and O6-nBu-dG lesions, which supports roles of these two polymerases in mediating error-prone nucleotide insertion opposite these lesions. Previous studies revealed cooperative roles of Pol η and Pol ζ in error-free TLS of cis,syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (68). Simultaneous ablation of Pol η and Pol ζ further attenuated the bypass efficiency of the two lesions to the levels observed in REV1-deficient cells. We therefore propose a model for cooperative bypass of the straight-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions by Pol η, Pol ζ, and REV1. REV1 may bind to the lesion site, which enables recruitment and stabilization of Pol η and Pol ζ to facilitate initial nucleotide insertion and subsequent strand extension, respectively.

It is worth noting that the mutation frequency of O6-Me-dG and O6-Et-dG detected in our experiment was higher than what was observed previously (24, 26). The differences could be attributed to the differences in intrachromosomal and episomal replication of the lesion-harboring DNA. Specifically, the Chinese hamster ovary and HEK293 cells used in the previous studies are not permissive for simian virus 40 (SV40)–dependent episomal replication; therefore, the lesion-containing vector needs to be integrated into the host chromosome for its replication (24, 69). In contrast, the existence of SV40 T large antigen in HEK293T and human skin fibroblast cells used in this study enables facile replication of the pTGFP-Hha10 plasmid, which contains an SV40 replication origin (70, 71), prior to lesion repair.

TLS of the branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions involves Pol ι and Pol κ. In particular, we found significant drops in mutation frequency for these lesions in Pol ι–deficient cells. Our observation is in accordance with in vitro studies showing a strong preference of Pol ι for misincorporating dTTP opposite O6-alkyl-dG lesions (29, 72). Previous structural studies have demonstrated that, unlike Pol η and Pol κ, which employ Watson–Crick base-pairing, Pol ι utilizes Hoogsteen base-pairing for DNA synthesis opposite template purines (73, 74). The unique base-pairing property of Pol ι may lead to preferential misinsertion of dTTP opposite O6-alkyl-dG. It is worth noting that Pol κ is more accurate than other TLS polymerases in bypassing branched-chain lesions. Although in vitro findings revealed that Pol κ is able to incorporate dCMP and dTMP efficiently opposite the straight-chain O6-Me-dG, a recent study showed error-free bypass of O6-carboxymethylguanine by human Pol κ (72). These results indicate a unique nucleotide selectivity of Pol κ upon bypassing the highly blocking branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions. Moreover, previous studies have suggested a role of Pol κ in NER (75, 76). Hence, Pol κ may also participate in repair of O6-alkyl-dG lesions via the NER pathway, especially those carrying the branched-chain alkyl groups (Fig. 2C). However, future studies are needed for understanding the exact molecular mechanism underlying involvement of Pol κ in ameliorating the mutagenic effects elicited by branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions.

Together, our systematic cellular study of a large group of structurally defined O6-alkyl-dG lesions provided novel insights into their impact on the efficiency and fidelity of DNA replication in human cells. We confirmed the replication blockage and mutagenic effects of O6-alkyl-dG lesions and revealed the involvement of distinct repair pathways and TLS polymerases in the removal and replicative bypass of straight-chain versus branched-chain O6-alkyl-dG lesions. Hence, the results of this study help fill the gap between the mutagenic mechanism and the carcinogenic effects of O6-alkyl-dG lesions.

Experimental procedures

Materials

All chemicals, unless otherwise specified, were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), and all enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-propanol was obtained from Oakwood Products Inc. (West Columbia, SC), and [γ-32P]ATP was acquired from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. All unmodified ODNs were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). HEK293T cells deficient in TLS polymerases were produced previously using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing method (37, 38).

Construction of lesion-containing and lesion-free control plasmids

The lesion-containing as well as the lesion-free control and competitor genomes were prepared following procedures published previously (77). Briefly, the parental vector was digested with Nt.BstNBI to generate a gapped plasmid, followed by removal of the resultant 25-mer single-stranded ODN by annealing with a 25-mer complementary ODN in 100× excess. The gapped plasmid was then isolated from the mixture by using 100-kDa-cutoff ultracentrifugal filter units (Millipore). The 12-mer lesion-containing ODNs (5′-ATGGCGXGCTAT-3′, X = O6-alkyl-dG) were synthesized and characterized previously by electrospray ionization MS and MS/MS analyses (3). The purified lesion-containing ODNs and the corresponding control ODNs were then ligated into the gapped plasmid along with a 13-mer lesion-free ODN (5′-AATTGAGTCGATG-3′) using T4 DNA ligase (Fig. S1).

Cell culture, transfection, and plasmid isolation

Replication experiments of the genomes constructed above were conducted using the strand-specific PCR-competitive replication and adduct bypass (SSPCR-CRAB) assay reported previously (35). The lesion-containing and corresponding unmodified dG-containing control plasmids were premixed individually with the competitor genome. The molar ratios of the competitor to control and lesion-bearing genomes were 1:3 and 1:9, respectively.

Human skin fibroblasts (GM00637 and GM04429), HEK293T cells, and isogenic TLS polymerase-deficient cells (POLH−/−, POLI−/−, POLK−/−, REV3L−/−, REV1−/−, POLH−/−/REV3L−/−, and POLI−/−/POLK−/−) were seeded (1 × 105) in a 24-well plate and cultured overnight at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere, followed by transfection with 300 ng of the mixed genomes using TransIT-2020 (Mirus Bio) following the manufacturer's recommended procedures. The cells were harvested 24 h after transfection, and the progenies of the plasmid were isolated using the GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The residual unreplicated plasmid was further removed by DpnI digestion and exonuclease III cleavage, following procedures reported previously (35).

O6-benzylguanine treatment

The treatment with O6-benzylguanine was conducted as described previously (54) with minor modifications. One day prior to treatment, human skin fibroblast cells were plated at a density of 8 × 104 cells in 24-well plates. After culture for 24 h, the cells were incubated with fresh medium containing 20 μm O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG) for 12 h. The medium was then removed, and the cells washed three times with PBS to eliminate residual O6-BG. The cells were recovered in fresh medium for 2 h and were subsequently transfected with plasmids for the cellular replication assay or harvested for Western blot analysis.

Western blotting

Total protein was extracted from the cell pellet using ice-cold CelLytic M cell lysis reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 1% (v/v) protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich). Proteins were resolved by electrophoresis in 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The blotted membranes were blocked for 1 h in PBS-T (PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20) plus 5% powdered nonfat dry milk, followed by incubation with primary antibodies against human MGMT (R&D Systems, goat polyclonal, 1:500) or GAPDH (0411, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, mouse monoclonal, 1:5,000) for 12 h. The membranes were then washed three times with PBS-T and incubated for 1 h with peroxidase-labeled donkey anti-goat IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:10,000) or mouse m-IgGκ BP-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:10,000) (Fig. S4). Amersham Biosciences ECL Prime Western blot detection reagent (GE Healthcare) was used to visualize the protein bands.

PCR amplification and PAGE analyses

The progeny genomes were amplified by nested PCR following procedures published previously (38). The final PCR amplicons were separated using 1% agarose gel, purified using the GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and stored at −20 °C until use. For PAGE analysis, 150 ng of the PCR fragments was treated with 5 units of NcoI-HF and 1 unit of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) at 37 °C in 10 μl of NEB buffer 3 for 1 h, followed by heating at 80 °C for 20 min to deactivate the SAP. To the above mixture were then added 1.25 μCi (0.5 pmol) of [γ-32P]ATP and 5 units of T4 polynucleotide kinase. The reaction was continued at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by heating at 75 °C for 20 min to deactivate the T4 polynucleotide kinase. To the above mixture was then added 2.0 unit SfaNI, and the solution was incubated at 37 °C for 1.5 h. The digestion was subsequently terminated by addition of 20 μl of formamide gel loading buffer. The above restriction digestion yielded a 16-mer radiolabeled fragment for the competitor genome and 13-mer fragments for the control or lesion-carrying genome (Figs. 2A and 3A). The digestion products were separated using 30% native polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide:bisacrylamide, 19:1) and quantified by phosphorimaging analysis (Figs. 2B and 3B). The relative bypass efficiency and mutation frequency were used to represent the effects of DNA lesions on replication efficiency and fidelity, respectively, where the relative bypass efficiency values were calculated from the ratios of (lesion signal/competitor signal)/(nonlesion control signal/competitor signal).

Identification of mutagenic products by LC-MS/MS

The replication products were also identified using LC-MS/MS analysis. Briefly, 2 μg of the PCR products described above were digested with 30 units of SfaNI and 15 units of SAP in 150 μl of NEB buffer 3 at 37 °C for 2 h, followed by deactivation of the phosphatase by heating at 80 °C for 20 min. To the mixture was added 50 units of NcoI, and the solution was incubated at 37 °C for another 2 h. The resulting solution was extracted once with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v), and to the ensuing aqueous layer were subsequently added 2.5 volumes of ethanol and 0.1 volume of 3.0 m sodium acetate to precipitate the DNA. The DNA pellet was then reconstituted in water and subjected to LC-MS and MS/MS analyses. An Agilent 1200 capillary HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and an LTQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) were used for all LC-MS and MS/MS experiments. The mass spectrometer was set up to acquire the higher-resolution “zoom-scan” MS and the MS/MS for the [M-3H]3− ions of the 13-mer 5′-CATGGCGNGCTGT-3′, where N represents A, T, C, or G (Figs. S5 and S6).

Author contributions

H. D. formal analysis; H. D. and P. W. investigation; H. D. writing-original draft; P. W. resources; P. W. methodology; L. L., resources; Y. W. conceptualization; Y. W. supervision; Y. W. funding acquisition.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Note added in proof

In the version of this article that was published as a Paper in Press on June 5, 2019, Lin Li was inadvertently omitted from the author line. This error has now been corrected.

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 ES025121. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

This article contains Figs. S1–S6.

2
The abbreviations used are:
O6-alkyl-dG
O6-alkyl-2′-deoxyguanosine
MGMT
O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase
NER
nucleotide excision repair
TLS
translesion synthesis
Pol
polymerase
O6-nPr-dG
O6-n-propyl-2′-deoxyguanosine
O6-iPr-dG
O6-iso-propyl-2′-deoxyguanosine
O6-iBu-dG
O6-iso-butyl-2′-deoxyguanosine
O6-sBu-dG
O6-sec-butyl-2′-deoxyguanosine
ODN
oligodeoxyribonucleotide
SSPCR-CRAB
strand-specific PCR-competitive replication and adduct bypass
SAP
shrimp alkaline phosphatase
XPA
xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A.

References

  • 1. Friedberg E. C., Walker G. C., Siede W., Wood R. D., Schultz R. A., and Ellenberger T. (2006) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, pp. 1–1118, ASM Press, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Shrivastav N., Li D., and Essigmann J. M. (2010) Chemical biology of mutagenesis and DNA repair: cellular responses to DNA alkylation. Carcinogenesis 31, 59–70 10.1093/carcin/bgp262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wang P., and Wang Y. (2018) Cytotoxic and mutagenic properties of O6-alkyl-2-deoxyguanosine lesions in Escherichia coli cells. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 15033–15042 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bignami M., O'Driscoll M., Aquilina G., and Karran P. (2000) Unmasking a killer: DNA O6-methylguanine and the cytotoxicity of methylating agents. Mutat. Res. 462, 71–82 10.1016/S1383-5742(00)00016-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Meikrantz W., Bergom M. A., Memisoglu A., and Samson L. (1998) O6-alkylguanine DNA lesions trigger apoptosis. Carcinogenesis 19, 369–372 10.1093/carcin/19.2.369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lewin M. H., Bailey N., Bandaletova T., Bowman R., Cross A. J., Pollock J., Shuker D. E., and Bingham S. A. (2006) Red meat enhances the colonic formation of the DNA adduct O6-carboxymethyl guanine: implications for colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 66, 1859–1865 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bronstein S. M., Cochrane J. E., Craft T. R., Swenberg J. A., and Skopek T. R. (1991) Toxicity, mutagenicity, and mutational spectra of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in human cell lines with different DNA repair phenotypes. Cancer Res. 51, 5188–5197 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Xu-Welliver M., and Pegg A. E. (2002) Degradation of the alkylated form of the DNA repair protein, O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Carcinogenesis 23, 823–830 10.1093/carcin/23.5.823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chueh L. L., Nakamura T., Nakatsu Y., Sakumi K., Hayakawa H., and Sekiguchi M. (1992) Specific amino acid sequences required for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity: analyses of three residues at or near the methyl acceptor site. Carcinogenesis 13, 837–843 10.1093/carcin/13.5.837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pegg A. E. (1990) Properties of mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA transferases. Mutat. Res. 233, 165–175 10.1016/0027-5107(90)90160-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kaina B., Fritz G., Mitra S., and Coquerelle T. (1991) Transfection and expression of human O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) cDNA in Chinese hamster cells: the role of MGMT in protection against the genotoxic effects of alkylating agents. Carcinogenesis 12, 1857–1867 10.1093/carcin/12.10.1857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Esteller M., Hamilton S. R., Burger P. C., Baylin S. B., and Herman J. G. (1999) Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia. Cancer Res. 59, 793–797 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kaina B., Christmann M., Naumann S., and Roos W. P. (2007) MGMT: key node in the battle against genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and apoptosis induced by alkylating agents. DNA Repair 6, 1079–1099 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bronstein S. M., Skopek T. R., and Swenberg J. A. (1992) Re: S. M. Bronstein et al. Efficient repair of O6-ethylguanine, but not O4-ethylthymine or O2-ethylthymine, is dependent upon O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and nucleotide excision repair activities in human cells. Cancer Res., 52: 2008–2011, 1992. Cancer Res. 52, 6983–6985 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lange S. S., Takata K., and Wood R. D. (2011) DNA polymerases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 96–110 10.1038/nrc2998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Berti M., and Vindigni A. (2016) Replication stress: getting back on track. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 103–109 10.1038/nsmb.3163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Michel B., Ehrlich S. D., and Uzest M. (1997) DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest. EMBO J. 16, 430–438 10.1093/emboj/16.2.430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ohmori H., Friedberg E. C., Fuchs R. P., Goodman M. F., Hanaoka F., Hinkle D., Kunkel T. A., Lawrence C. W., Livneh Z., Nohmi T., Prakash L., Prakash S., Todo T., Walker G. C., Wang Z., and Woodgate R. (2001) The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol. Cell 8, 7–8 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00278-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sale J. E., Lehmann A. R., and Woodgate R. (2012) Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 141–152 10.1038/nrm3289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gan G. N., Wittschieben J. P., Wittschieben B. Ø., and Wood R. D. (2008) DNA polymerase ζ (pol ζ) in higher eukaryotes. Cell Res. 18, 174–183 10.1038/cr.2007.117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Takata K., Shimizu T., Iwai S., and Wood R. D. (2006) Human DNA polymerase N (POLN) is a low fidelity enzyme capable of error-free bypass of 5S-thymine glycol. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 23445–23455 10.1074/jbc.M604317200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yousefzadeh M. J., and Wood R. D. (2013) DNA polymerase POLQ and cellular defense against DNA damage. DNA Repair 12, 1–9 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Waters L. S., Minesinger B. K., Wiltrout M. E., D'Souza S., Woodruff R. V., and Walker G. C. (2009) Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 134–154 10.1128/MMBR.00034-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ellison K. S., Dogliotti E., Connors T. D., Basu A. K., and Essigmann J. M. (1989) Site-specific mutagenesis by O6-alkylguanines located in the chromosomes of mammalian cells: influence of the mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 8620–8624 10.1073/pnas.86.22.8620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wu J., Wang P., Li L., You C., and Wang Y. (2018) Cytotoxic and mutagenic properties of minor-groove O2-alkylthymidine lesions in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 8638–8644 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pauly G. T., and Moschel R. C. (2001) Mutagenesis by O6-methyl-, O6-ethyl-, and O6-benzylguanine and O4-methylthymine in human cells: effects of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and mismatch repair. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14, 894–900 10.1021/tx010032f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Perrino F. W., Blans P., Harvey S., Gelhaus S. L., McGrath C., Akman S. A., Jenkins G. S., LaCourse W. R., and Fishbein J. C. (2003) The N2-ethylguanine and the O6-ethyl- and O6-methylguanine lesions in DNA: contrasting responses from the “bypass” DNA polymerase η and the replicative DNA polymerase α. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16, 1616–1623 10.1021/tx034164f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Roos W. P., and Kaina B. (2013) DNA damage-induced cell death: from specific DNA lesions to the DNA damage response and apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 332, 237–248 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Choi J. Y., Chowdhury G., Zang H., Angel K. C., Vu C. C., Peterson L. A., and Guengerich F. P. (2006) Translesion synthesis across O6-alkylguanine DNA adducts by recombinant human DNA polymerases. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 38244–38256 10.1074/jbc.M608369200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Airoldi L., Magagnotti C., Bonfanti M., Chiappetta L., Lolli M., Medana C., De Gregorio G., and Fanelli R. (1994) Detection of O6-butyl- and O6-(4-hydroxybutyl)guanine in urothelial and hepatic DNA of rats given the bladder carcinogen N-nitrosobutyl(4-hydroxybutyl)amine. Carcinogenesis 15, 2297–2301 10.1093/carcin/15.10.2297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Morimoto K., Dolan M. E., Scicchitano D., and Pegg A. E. (1985) Repair of O6-propylguanine and O6-butylguanine in DNA by O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferases from rat liver and E. coli. Carcinogenesis 6, 1027–1031 10.1093/carcin/6.7.1027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ortlieb H., and Kleihues P. (1980) Reaction of N-n-butyl-N-nitrosourea with DNA in vitro. Carcinogenesis 1, 849–854 10.1093/carcin/1.10.849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Peterson L. A., Thomson N. M., Crankshaw D. L., Donaldson E. E., and Kenney P. J. (2001) Interactions between methylating and pyridyloxobutylating agents in A/J mouse lungs: implications for 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-induced lung tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 61, 5757–5763 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Peterson L. A., and Hecht S. S. (1991) O6-methylguanine is a critical determinant of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone tumorigenesis in A/J mouse lung. Cancer Res. 51, 5557–5564 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. You C., Swanson A. L., Dai X., Yuan B., Wang J., and Wang Y. (2013) Translesion synthesis of 8,5′-cyclopurine-2′-deoxynucleosides by DNA polymerases η, ι, and ζ. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 28548–28556 10.1074/jbc.M113.480459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tubbs J. L., Latypov V., Kanugula S., Butt A., Melikishvili M., Kraehenbuehl R., Fleck O., Marriott A., Watson A. J., Verbeek B., McGown G., Thorncroft M., Santibanez-Koref M. F., Millington C., Arvai A. S., et al. (2009) Flipping of alkylated DNA damage bridges base and nucleotide excision repair. Nature 459, 808–813 10.1038/nature08076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wu J., Li L., Wang P., You C., Williams N. L., and Wang Y. (2016) Translesion synthesis of O4-alkylthymidine lesions in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 9256–9265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Du H., Leng J., Wang P., Li L., and Wang Y. (2018) Impact of tobacco-specific nitrosamine-derived DNA adducts on the efficiency and fidelity of DNA replication in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 11100–11108 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Guo C., Fischhaber P. L., Luk-Paszyc M. J., Masuda Y., Zhou J., Kamiya K., Kisker C., and Friedberg E. C. (2003) Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J. 22, 6621–6630 10.1093/emboj/cdg626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Yoon J. H., Park J., Conde J., Wakamiya M., Prakash L., and Prakash S. (2015) Rev1 promotes replication through UV lesions in conjunction with DNA polymerases η, ι, and κ but not DNA polymerase ζ. Genes Dev. 29, 2588–2602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Johnson R. E., Yu S. L., Prakash S., and Prakash L. (2003) Yeast DNA polymerase ζ is essential for error-free replication past thymine glycol. Genes Dev. 17, 77–87 10.1101/gad.1048303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Johnson R. E., Washington M. T., Haracska L., Prakash S., and Prakash L. (2000) Eukaryotic polymerases ι and ζ act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature 406, 1015–1019 10.1038/35023030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kirouac K. N., and Ling H. (2011) Unique active site promotes error-free replication opposite an 8-oxo-guanine lesion by human DNA polymerase ι. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 3210–3215 10.1073/pnas.1013909108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Minko I. G., Harbut M. B., Kozekov I. D., Kozekova A., Jakobs P. M., Olson S. B., Moses R. E., Harris T. M., Rizzo C. J., and Lloyd R. S. (2008) Role for DNA polymerase κ in the processing of N2-N2-guanine interstrand cross-links. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 17075–17082 10.1074/jbc.M801238200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Takenaka K., Ogi T., Okada T., Sonoda E., Guo C., Friedberg E. C., and Takeda S. (2006) Involvement of vertebrate pol κ in translesion DNA synthesis across DNA monoalkylation damage. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 2000–2004 10.1074/jbc.M506153200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Haracska L., Prakash L., and Prakash S. (2002) Role of human DNA polymerase κ as an extender in translesion synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 16000–16005 10.1073/pnas.252524999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Bauer N. C., Corbett A. H., and Doetsch P. W. (2015) The current state of eukaryotic DNA base damage and repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 10083–10101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Yang W., and Gao Y. (2018) Translesion and repair DNA polymerases: diverse structure and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 239–261 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jalal S., Earley J. N., and Turchi J. J. (2011) DNA repair: from genome maintenance to biomarker and therapeutic target. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 6973–6984 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Jeggo P. A., Pearl L. H., and Carr A. M. (2016) DNA repair, genome stability and cancer: a historical perspective. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 35–42 10.1038/nrc.2015.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Souliotis V. L., and Kyrtopoulos S. A. (1989) A novel, sensitive assay for O6-methyl- and O6-ethylguanine in DNA, based on repair by the enzyme O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase in competition with an oligonucleotide containing O6-methylguanine. Cancer Res. 49, 6997–7001 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Choi J. Y., and Guengerich F. P. (2005) Adduct size limits efficient and error-free bypass across bulky N2-guanine DNA lesions by human DNA polymerase η. J. Mol. Biol. 352, 72–90 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Pegg A. E., Scicchitano D., and Dolan M. E. (1984) Comparison of the rates of repair of O6-alkylguanines in DNA by rat liver and bacterial O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Cancer Res. 44, 3806–3811 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Dolan M. E., Moschel R. C., and Pegg A. E. (1990) Depletion of mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity by O6-benzylguanine provides a means to evaluate the role of this protein in protection against carcinogenic and therapeutic alkylating agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 5368–5372 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Pegg A. E., Dolan M. E., Scicchitano D., and Morimoto K. (1985) Studies of the repair of O6-alkylguanine and O4-alkylthymine in DNA by alkyltransferases from mammalian cells and bacteria. Environ. Health Perspect. 62, 109–114 10.1289/ehp.8562109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Pegg A. E. (1990) Mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: regulation and importance in response to alkylating carcinogenic and therapeutic agents. Cancer Res. 50, 6119–6129 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Dolan M. E., Morimoto K., and Pegg A. E. (1985) Reduction of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in HeLa cells treated with O6-alkylguanines. Cancer Res. 45, 6413–6417 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Pegg A. E., and Byers T. L. (1992) Repair of DNA containing O6-alkylguanine. FASEB J. 6, 2302–2310 10.1096/fasebj.6.6.1544541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Boyle J. M., Durrant L. G., Wild C. P., Saffhill R., and Margison G. P. (1987) Genetic evidence for nucleotide excision repair of O6-alkylguanine in mammalian cells. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 6, 147–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Samson L., Han S., Marquis J. C., and Rasmussen L. J. (1997) Mammalian DNA repair methyltransferases shield O4MeT from nucleotide excision repair. Carcinogenesis 18, 919–924 10.1093/carcin/18.5.919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Groth P., Ausländer S., Majumder M. M., Schultz N., Johansson F., Petermann E., and Helleday T. (2010) Methylated DNA causes a physical block to replication forks independently of damage signalling, O6-methylguanine or DNA single-strand breaks and results in DNA damage. J. Mol. Biol. 402, 70–82 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Shachar S., Ziv O., Avkin S., Adar S., Wittschieben J., Reissner T., Chaney S., Friedberg E. C., Wang Z., Carell T., Geacintov N., and Livneh Z. (2009) Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J. 28, 383–393 10.1038/emboj.2008.281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Pence M. G., Blans P., Zink C. N., Hollis T., Fishbein J. C., and Perrino F. W. (2009) Lesion bypass of N2-ethylguanine by human DNA polymerase ι. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 1732–1740 10.1074/jbc.M807296200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Washington M. T., Minko I. G., Johnson R. E., Wolfle W. T., Harris T. M., Lloyd R. S., Prakash S., and Prakash L. (2004) Efficient and error-free replication past a minor-groove DNA adduct by the sequential action of human DNA polymerases ι and κ. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 5687–5693 10.1128/MCB.24.13.5687-5693.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Hendel A., Ziv O., Gueranger Q., Geacintov N., and Livneh Z. (2008) Reduced efficiency and increased mutagenicity of translesion DNA synthesis across a TT cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, but not a TT 6–4 photoproduct, in human cells lacking DNA polymerase η. DNA Repair 7, 1636–1646 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.06.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Choi J. Y., Lim S., Kim E. J., Jo A., and Guengerich F. P. (2010) Translesion synthesis across abasic lesions by human B-family and Y-family DNA polymerases α, δ, η, ι, κ, and REV1. J. Mol. Biol. 404, 34–44 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Choi J. Y., and Guengerich F. P. (2008) Kinetic analysis of translesion synthesis opposite bulky N2- and O6-alkylguanine DNA adducts by human DNA polymerase REV1. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23645–23655 10.1074/jbc.M801686200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Lee Y. S., Gregory M. T., and Yang W. (2014) Human Pol ζ purified with accessory subunits is active in translesion DNA synthesis and complements Pol η in cisplatin bypass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 2954–2959 10.1073/pnas.1324001111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Ellison K. S., Dogliotti E., and Essigmann J. M. (1989) Construction of a shuttle vector containing a single O6-methylguanine: a probe for mutagenesis in mammalian cells. Mutat. Res. 220, 93–100 10.1016/0165-1110(89)90014-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Graham F. L., and van der Eb A. J. (1973) A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology 52, 456–467 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90341-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Chittenden T., Frey A., and Levine A. J. (1991) Regulated replication of an episomal simian virus 40 origin plasmid in COS7 cells. J. Virol. 65, 5944–5951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Räz M. H., Dexter H. R., Millington C. L., van Loon B., Williams D. M., and Sturla S. J. (2016) Bypass of mutagenic O6-carboxymethylguanine DNA adducts by human Y- and B-family polymerases. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 29, 1493–1503 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Johnson R. E., Prakash L., and Prakash S. (2005) Biochemical evidence for the requirement of Hoogsteen base pairing for replication by human DNA polymerase ι. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 10466–10471 10.1073/pnas.0503859102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Johnson R. E., Haracska L., Prakash L., and Prakash S. (2006) Role of Hoogsteen edge hydrogen bonding at template purines in nucleotide incorporation by human DNA polymerase ι. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 6435–6441 10.1128/MCB.00851-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Lupari E., Ventura I., Marcon F., Aquilina G., Dogliotti E., and Fortini P. (2012) Pol κ partially rescues MMR-dependent cytotoxicity of O6-methylguanine. DNA Repair 11, 579–586 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Williams H. L., Gottesman M. E., and Gautier J. (2012) Replication-independent repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks. Mol. Cell 47, 140–147 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Yuan B. F., O'Connor T. R., and Wang Y. (2010) 6-Thioguanine and S6-methylthioguanine are mutagenic in human cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 5, 1021–1027 10.1021/cb100214b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES