Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jul 22;9:10564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46661-3

Surgical anatomy of the ovine sural nerve for facial nerve regeneration and reconstruction research

Yosuke Niimi 1,2, Satoshi Fukuda 1, Ryan S Gilbert 3, Tuvshintugs Baljinnyam 1, Yu Niimi 4, Hajime Matsumine 2, Keibun Liu 1, Sam Jacob 3, Hal K Hawkins 5, Robert A Cox 3, David N Herndon 6, Donald S Prough 1, Perenlei Enkhbaatar 1,7,✉
PMCID: PMC6646377  PMID: 31332199

Abstract

The lack of a clinically relevant animal models for research in facial nerve reconstruction is challenging. In this study, we investigated the surgical anatomy of the ovine sural nerve as a potential candidate for facial nerve reconstruction, and performed its histological quantitative analysis in comparison to the buccal branch (BB) of the facial nerve using cadaver and anesthetized sheep. The ovine sural nerve descended to the lower leg along the short saphenous vein. The length of the sural nerve was 14.3 ± 0.5 cm. The distance from the posterior edge of the lateral malleolus to the sural nerve was 7.8 ± 1.8 mm. The mean number of myelinated fibers in the sural nerve was significantly lower than that of the BB (2,311 ± 381vs. 5,022 ± 433, respectively. p = 0.003). The number of fascicles in the sural nerve was also significantly lower than in the BB (10.5 ± 1.7 vs. 21.3 ± 2.7, respectively. p = 0.007). The sural nerve was grafted to the BB with end-to-end neurorrhaphy under surgical microscopy in cadaver sheep. The surgical anatomy and the number of fascicles of the ovine sural nerve were similar of those reported in humans. The results suggest that the sural nerve can be successfully used for facial nerve reconstruction research in a clinically relevant ovine model.

Subject terms: Neurology, Anatomy, Neurological disorders

Introduction

Many patients suffer from defects of the buccal branch of the facial nerve caused by malignant craniofacial tumors or various traumas, including burns. This becomes a serious long-term issue because the buccal branch is responsible for many vital activities such as facial expression, eating, and drinking. Autologous sural nerve grafting with an end-to-end neurorrhaphy technique to bridge defects of the buccal branch is the gold standard of surgical treatment for facial nerve reconstruction1. The sural nerve is frequently used as a donor nerve for human facial nerve reconstruction because it is a sensory nerve, can be easily harvested, and is associated with relatively low donor site morbidity2,3.

There are many basic science preclinical models in rats that are currently used for the development of novel techniques for facial nerve reconstruction and regeneration, including the use of various scaffolds4,5, stem cells6,7, and neurorrhaphy techniques8. The pathophysiology of facial palsy has been studied in rat models as well9,10. However, most of the rodent studies have used the sciatic or great auricular nerves because these nerves are harvested easily, and the rodent sural nerve is too short. For this reason, a clinically-relevant large animal nerve graft model for facial nerve regeneration research is needed. Such a model may offer a better translational approach in this field.

Sheep are frequently used to mimic clinical scenarios of human disease and treatment because the anatomy of their organs (e.g. lung, spine, skin, and subcutaneous tissue), as well as their responses to inflammation, are similar to those in humans11–14. We have previously reported the surgical anatomy of the ovine facial and hypoglossal nerves, and described anatomical and histological similarities of these nerves to their human counterparts15. By contrast, the anatomy and functional capacity of these nerves in rodents and swine are quite different from those in humans16,17. May et al. partially described the anatomy of the ovine sural nerve, but in that work sural nerve harvesting surgical technique was not sufficiently described, and histological assessments were not performed18. The goal of this study was to establish an ovine model of facial nerve grafting for future research on facial nerve regeneration and reconstruction. We have investigated the surgical anatomy of the ovine sural nerve and its related nerves (i.e., medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN), tibial, common fibular, and sciatic nerves), and compared the histological structures of these nerves to those of the buccal branch.

Results

Surgical procedure to identify the ovine sural nerve

C-shaped, full-thickness skin incision from the lateral gluteal-thigh border to 2 cm posterior to the lateral malleolus was made on the ovine cadaver right leg (Fig. 1A), and full-thickness skin was undermined widely using a scalpel. The gluteal muscle, biceps femoris muscle, semimembranosus muscle, Achilles tendon, and short saphenous vein were identified (Fig. 1B). The sural nerve, the medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN), and a communicating branch were found to be located under the gastrocnemius fascia, between the lateral and medial heads of the gastrocnemius, distal to the biceps femoris (Fig. 1C,D). The sural nerve was formed by the MSCN and communicating branch, and descended to the distal portion.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Surgical procedure to identify of the ovine sural nerve. (A) The green line shows the incision line. From the lateral gluteal-thigh border to 2 cm posterior the lateral malleolus C-shape incision was made on the ovine cadaver right leg. (B) The gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF), semimembranosus (SM), Achilles tendon (AT), lateral malleolus (LM) were dissected after undermining the skin flap. The short saphenous vein (SSV) was identified. (C,D) The sural nerve, medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN), and communicating branch (Cb) were identified to be located under the gastrocnemius fascia, between the lateral and medial head of the gastrocnemius, and distal of BF. Sural nerve formed by MSCN and Cb. Gc (Medial h.): Gastrocnemius medial head. Gc (Lateral h.): Gastrocnemius lateral head.

Surgical anatomy of the ovine sural nerve and its related nerves

The sural nerve descended in the gastrocnemius fascia pararell to the short saphenous vein. Thereafter, the sural nerve descended into the subcutaneous tissue approximately at the midpoint of the lower leg. (Fig. 2A,B). The sural nerve descended along with the short saphenous vein to the distal portion of the lower leg. The sural nerve ran posterior to the lateral malleolus in the subcutaneous tissue. After passing over the lateral malleolus, the sural nerve went into deep subcutaneous tissue (Fig. 2C,D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The surgical anatomy of sural nerve (Sural n.); middle (A,B) and distal (C,D) portion of the leg. (A,B) The sural nerve (white arrow head) ran parallel to the short saphenous vein (SSV, blue rubber tape), and ran medial side of the gastrocnemius (Gc) lateral head (Lateral h.). Thereafter, two nerves (yellow arrow heads) were merging to the sural nerve at the midpoint of the lower leg. (C,D) In the distal portion of lower leg, the sural nerve was passed posterior to the lateral malleolus (LM). Thereafter, the sural nerve penetrated the deep fascia and went into the foot area. AT: Achilles tendon. Gc (Lateral h.): Gastrocnemius lateral head.

The medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN) was dissected to the popliteal fossa. The MSCN, tibial nerve, common fibular nerve, and sciatic nerve were identified between the biceps femoris and semimembranosus muscles (Fig. 3A,B). To identifiy the detailed anatomy of the MSCN, the surounding tissue menbrane was removed. The MSCN formed two branches. One branch, originating from the sciatic nerve, was located between the tibial and common fibular nerves. The other branch originated from the tibial nerve (Fig. 3C,D). The MSCN descended pararell to the short saphenous vein in the gastrocnemius fascia. Thereafter, the MSCN joined with a communicating branch and formed the sural nerve in the fascia.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The surgical anatomy of medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN). (A,B) To dissect to the proximal region from the point of Fig. 1, MSCN was divided from sciatic nerve (Sciatic n.) near the tibial nerve side between biceps femoris and semimembranosus. Common fibular nerve (Common fibular n.) was also devided from scaiatic nerve at the same place. (C,D) After removing connective tissue, MSCN was exposed forming from two branches, which were originated from sciatic and tibial nerves.

Dimensions of the sural nerve and buccal branch

The sural nerve from the proximal to the distal end was harvested (Fig. 4A). The length of the sural nerve and MSCN were 14.3 ± 0.5 and 16.4 ± 0.8 cm, respectively (Table 1). The distance from the posterior edge of the lateral malleolus to the sural nerve was 7.8 ± 1.8 mm (Table 1). The width of the sural nerve was significantly lower than that of the buccal branch of the facial nerve (1.2 ± 0.07 vs. 1.4 ± 0.04 mm respectively. p = 0.0117) (Fig. 5B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) The picture of sural nerve and medial sural cutaneous nerve. The average lengths of the medial sural cutaneous and sural nerve were 14.3 ± 0.5 (n = 7) and 16.4 ± 0.8 cm (n = 7), respectively. The average of total length was 30.2 ± 0.7 cm (n = 16). Unit of the ruler: cm (B) The width of sural nerve (n = 10) and buccal branch (n = 8) were measured using the photographs by ImageJ software version 1.50 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) The width of the sural nerve was significantly lower than that of the buccal branch (1.2 ± 0.07 vs. 1.4 ± 0.04 mm respectively. p = 0.0117).

Table 1.

The dimensions of the sural nerve and medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN).

Measurement items This study Human
Length of the sural nerve (cm) 14.3 ± 0.5 11–2021,22
Length of the MSCN (cm) 16.4 ± 0.8 21–3321
Distance from the posterior of lateral malleolus to the sural nerve (mm) 7.8 ± 1.8 7 ± 519
Diameter of the sural nerve (mm) 1.2 ± 0.07

2.0–3.021

3.5–3.820
Diameter of the buccal branch (mm) 1.4 ± 0.04 Not stated
Open in a new tab

Data in this study are shown as mean ± SEM.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The toluidine blue stain of sural nerve (Left column) and buccal branch (right column). Both sural nerve (A) and buccal branch (B) had epineurium. (C) Myelin sheaths of axons of the sural nerve was stained blue color and observed clearly. (D) Dense myelin sheath of buccal branch was observed. (A,B) Scale bar: 200 μm. (C,D) Scale bar: 50 μm.

No functional motion of the leg was observed after stimulating the sural nerve and the MSCN

By electric stimulation, we determined that the common fibular and tibial nerves innervated leg muscles. On the other hand, no innervation of leg muscles was observed after stimulation of the sural nerve or the MSCN. These results showed that the sural nerve and the MSCN are sensory nerves.

Histological assessments of sural nerve and buccal branch

In semithin sections of plastic-embedded specimens stained to provide dark blue staining of myelin, sections of both the sural nerve and the buccal branch of the facial nerve revealed multiple fascicles surrounded by epineurium. Small peripheral blood vessels were observed in both nerves (Fig. 5). The mean number of myelinated fibers in the sural nerve was significantly lower than in the buccal branch (2,311 ± 381 vs. 5,022 ± 433, respectively, p = 0.003) (Fig. 6A). The number of fascicles in the sural nerve was significantly lower than in the buccal branch (10.5 ± 1.7 vs. 21.3 ± 2.7, respectively, p = 0.007) (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Histological assessment. (A) The mean number of myelinated fibers in the Sural nerve were significantly lower than that in the buccal branch (2,311 ± 381 vs. 5,022 ± 433, respectively, p = 0.003). (B) The number of fascicles in the sural nerve were significantly lower than that in the buccal branch (10.5 ± 1.7 vs. 21.3 ± 2.7, respectively, p = 0.007).

Sural nerve graft to the buccal branch with end-to-end neurorrhaphy

A 15-mm segment of the sural nerve was grafted with six-epineural suture techniques using 10-0 nylon to bridge the defect in the buccal branch of the ovine facial nerve with end-to-end neurorrhaphy under a surgical microscope. Although the diameter of the donor (sural) nerve was smaller compared to the recipient (buccal) nerve, epineural suturing was performed easily without any tension (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Demonstration of sural nerve graft to the buccal branch with end-to-end neurorrhaphy. (A) Schematic diagram of sural nerve graft. end-to-end neurorrhaphy was performed 10 mm distal to the edge of parotid gland (PG). (B) Microscopical image of end-to-end neurorrhaphy. Fifteen millimeter-sural nerve was grafted 6 perineural sutures using 10-0 nylon to bridge the defect of buccal branch with end-to-end neurorrhaphy under the surgical microscope. One unit indicates 1 mm.

Discussion

In this study, we aimed to describe the surgical anatomy of the ovine sural nerve. Additionally, the surgical anatomy of the medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN) was determined. We found some similarities of sural nerve between sheep and humans, as follows: (1) The ovine sural nerve descended along with the short saphenous vein between the medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius muscle, similarly to humans; (2) The distal part of the ovine sural nerve was found to be located at an average of 7.8 ± 1.8 mm from the posterior edge of the lateral malleolus, similar to the 7 ± 5 mm distance in humans19. This finding was usefull as a landmark to identify the ovine sural nerve when it was harvested. As the anatomical variations in human sural nerve are well documented20,21, further investigations of variations of the ovine sural nerve anatomy and pathways are needed; (3) The length of the ovine sural nerve (14.3 cm) was in the same range as in humans (11–20 cm)21. In humans, a maximum 40 cm of sural nerve can be harvested including MSCN22. In our ovine study, an average of 30 cm of nerve could be harvested including MSCN. This enables studies requiring long donor nerves to perform various grafts such as an interpositional jump graft or cross face nerve graft3,23,24. The length of the sural nerve in the miniature pig (from the sciatic nerve to its distal end) is 12.3 ± 1.2 cm25; and (4) Electric nerve stimulation proved that the sural nerve is a sensory nerve similar to that in humans. In addition, the human sural nerve innervates the dorsal lateral foot. Further studies are warranted to explore the sensory area of ovine sural nerve innervation, and examine the possibility of long-term complications such as donor site decubitus.

In our study, we found some differences of sural nerve anatomy and morphology between ovine and human as follows: (1) The ovine sural nerve penetrated the fascia and soon naturally went into the subcutaneous tissue at approximately half of the length of the lower leg, because ovine MSCN joined a communicating branch before going into subcutaneous tissue, whereas 84% of human MSCN join the communicating branch after the MSCN penetrates the crural fascia in the middle third of the leg26; and (2) the number of myelinated fibers in ovine sural nerve was 2,311 ± 381. Although we found that the number of fascicles in the sural nerve in sheep was in same range as in humans (9–14)21, the number of myelinated fibers in the sural nerve in sheep seemed to be lower than in humans. In humans, the number of myelinated fibers of the sural nerve described by Chentanez27, Jacob28, and Behse29 were 5,672.8 ± 1,753.7, 5,918.3 ± 1,201.9 and 7,252.5 ± 1,242.8, respectively.

Interstingly, we also found that the number of myelinated fibers in the ovine buccal branch (4,768 ± 430) was much higher than in humans (1,670, average age 72 years)30. In another study, the number of myelinated nerve fibers in the human buccal branch was reported as 1,736 without indicating the age31. Although the basis for this discrepancy is not known, we speculate the following: (1) It has previously been shown that when age increases, the number of buccal nerve as well as facial nerve trunk fibers decreases30,32. In the present study, we used approximately 3-year-old sheep, equivalent to 30-year-old humans; and (2) we counted only myelinated fibers in our ovine study. Jacob et al. reported that the total number of myelinated fibers and unmyelinated axons in human buccal branch is 5,58931.

In this study, we have also developed a technique for grafting of a segment of sural nerve to the buccal branch of the facial nerve using end-to-end neurorrhaphy in cadaver sheep. Although the ovine sural nerve was narrower than the buccal branch, we were able to successfully perform end-to-end neurorrhaphy without any technical problemsThin cutaneous nerve grafts are easily revascularized leading to successful engraftment33. In regard this, the ovine sural nerve can be an excellent candidate for buccal branch reconstruction. In addition, the number of ovine sural myelinated fibers was less than that of ovine buccal branch. Despite numerous reports, the significance of matching the number of donor and recipient nerves remains unclear34,35. Terzis et al. reported that number of axon of proximal recipient nerves was more correlated with functional outcome than that of a donor nerve in the clinical cross face nerve graft study36. Future research is warranted to investigate the degree of grafted sural nerve regeneration.

Artificial nerve conduits are used for treating the sensory nerve, such as digital nerve injuries37. In addition, various artificial nerve conduits (polyglycolic acid5, poly lactic-co-glycolic acid38, collagen39, and acellular nerve allografts40,41) and cell therapy (adipose derived stem cells42, stromal vascular fraction6, dental pulp cells43, and Schwann cells44) have been reported to be beneficial in small animal studies. However, only a few clinical studies reported use of artificial nerve conduits for motor nerve reconstruction including facial nerves45. The lack of clinical studies using artificial nerves may be related to the fact that the nerves reconstructed with artificial nerves are less functional compared to that reconstructed with “gold standard” autologous nerve graft46. The other reason may be related to the lack of clinically relevant large animal models allowed to investigate the effects of artificial nerve conduits in comparison to autologous nerve grafts. We believe that an ovine model of sural nerve regeneration may fill the existing gap.

The limitations of this study include a relatively small number of animals studied. Another limitation is that this study describes sural anatomy and histology only in the right side of the ovine leg. Additionally, this study did not directly evalaute human buccal and sural nerve anatomy, instead it compared ovine sural nerve anatomy to those in humans that have been previousy published elswhere27–29. Also, this study did not focus on functional aspects of the sural nerve and its branches.

In summary, the results of the present study show that the surgical anatomy and morphology of the ovine sural nerve are quite similar to those of humans, suggesting that an ovine sural nerve grafting model can be successfully used for research on facial nerve regeneration and reconstruction. Future research is warranted to study facial nerve regeneration using this clinically-relevant ovine model with end-to-end neurorrhaphy.

Materials and Methods

For this study, twenty-three cadaver sheep (female Merino sheep, 36.7 ± 0.8 kg, approximately 3 years old; Talley Ranch, Bastrop, TX) and three anesthetized sheep (39.3 kg ± 1.2 kg, approximately 3 years old) were used. All animal studies were conducted in adherence with the guidelines detailed in the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Experimental design

The surgical anatomy of the sural nerve (n = 23) and the histology of the sural nerve (n = 8) and the buccal branch of the facial nerve (n = 6) were studied in cadaver sheep. These sheep were euthanized after completing other studies (i.e., pulmonary, wound healing) by intravenous injection of saturated potassium chloride under deep anesthesia and analgesia (ketamine 5 mg/kg, xylazine 100 mg and buprenorphine 0.3 mg). In addition, three cadaver sheep were used for neurorrhaphy.

Three anesthetized sheep were used for nerve stimulation. These sheep were pre-medicated with 2.5 mg/kg ketamine, and 2% isoflurane via mask. The sheep were then intubated and anesthesia continued with 2–5% isoflurane and mechanically ventilated.

Surgical procedure and measured variables of the sural nerve

To investigate the ovine sural nerve anatomy, the cadaver sheep were positioned at right lateral position. The dimensions of sural nerve were measured as follows: the length of the sural nerve from the distal end of the medial sural cutaneous nerve (MSCN) to the end point of the lateral malleolus; the length of the MSCN; the distance between the posterior margin of the lateral malleolus and the sural nerve; and the diameter of the sural nerve at a point 2 cm proximal to the distal end using the photographs by ImageJ software version 1.50 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Then, a 15 mm segment of the sural nerve beginning at a point 5 cm proximal from the lateral malleolus was sharply harvested using a scalpel for histological analysis.

Surgical procedure to harvest the buccal branch of the facial nerve

The surgical procedure for approaching the buccal branch was described previously15. Briefly, a pre-auricular incision extending from 1.5 cm posterior to the mandibular ramus to a submandibular point 2 cm below the mandibular body was made in the right face of the sheep cadaver. The platysma muscle was dissected to expose the buccal branch of the facial nerve and the parotid gland. Thereafter, the diameter of the buccal branch at a point 1 cm distal to the anterior parotid border was measured by ImageJ using the photograph. Then, the 15 mm-buccal branch at the same point was sharply harvested by scalpel for histological analysis.

Stimulation of the sural nerve and the sciatic nerve and its branches

The same incision as in cadaver study was made on the right leg of anesthetized sheep without use of paralytic agents. After their exposure, the sural nerve and the sciatic nerve and its branches (i.e., MSCN, tibial, and common fibular nerves) were stimulated (approximately 10 mA, 200-μsec monopolar pulses/second for one second) from an electrocautery pencil tip (Rocker Switch Pencil, COVIDIEN, MA, USA) attached to the clamp end of the electrodes supplied with the nerve stimulator (INNERVATOR NS252, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, New Zealand). The biceps femoris, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscle contractions were observed and photographed.

Semithin sections of toluidine blue stain of myelinated fibers

Immediately upon surgical extraction, the sural nerve and buccal nerve branch specimens were placed in a buffered fixative containing formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde for 24 hours (Trump’s Fixative, Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA). Nerve specimens were then post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide diluted in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate buffer overnight before being embedded in epoxy resin (EMBed-812 Embedding Kit, Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA). The resin embedded specimens were then cut at 2 μm thickness using an ultramicrotome and stained with 1% toluidine blue. Images of the semithin sections were then captured under a light microscope. Numbers of myelinated fibers and fascicles were manually counted using ImageJ.

Sural nerve graft to repair a defect of the buccal branch of the facial nerve with end-to-end neurorrhaphy

To perform end-to-end neurorrhaphy, the right lateral incision described above was made in the face of a cadaver sheep. A 15-mm long section of buccal branch was exposed and dissected from the surrounding connective tissues on the fascia of the masseter muscle using micro-scissors at a point 1 cm distal to the anterior parotid border. Then, a 15 mm long nerve defect of the buccal branch was made. A 15 mm long segment of the sural nerve located 5 cm above the lateral malleolus was harvested in the right leg. The sural nerve segment was sutured using 10-0 nylon (Ethilon, Ethicon, NJ) to bridge the defect of the buccal branch with end-to-end neurorrhaphy using a surgical microscope (OPMI-1, ZEISS, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Numerical data are expressed as means ± SEM. Data values in two groups were compared by unpaired t-test. The probability of less than 0.05 (P < 0.05) was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism version 7.00 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA.).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff of the Translational Intensive Care Unit at the University of Texas Medical Branch for their valuable assistance in conducting these studies, and Mr. Andrew W. Hall and Ms. Clemmie White-Matthews for their editorial assistances in preparing this article. Dr. Enkhbaatar received funding from the Shriners of North America grant # 84050.

Author Contributions

Y.N., S.F., R.S.G., T.B., Y.N., H.M., K.L. and P.E. designed the study. Y.N., S.F., T.B. and K.L. performed experiments, and analyzing the data. R.S.G., S.J., H.K.H. and R.A.C. performed histological sections. Y.N., R.S.G. and P.E. wrote the manuscript. D.N.H. and D.S.P. provided expert advice and reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Jackson CG, Glasscock ME, III, Hughes G, Sismanis A. Facial paralysis of neoplastic origin: diagnosis and management. Laryngoscope. 1980;90:1581–1595. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198010000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Terzis JK, Sun DD, Thanos PK. Historical and basic science review: Past present, and future of nerve repair. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery. 1997;13:215–225. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee EI, Hurvitz KA, Evans GRD, Wirth GA. Cross-facial nerve graft: past and present. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2007;61:250–256. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matsumine H, Sasaki R, Yamato M, Okano T, Sakurai H. A polylactic acid non-woven nerve conduit for facial nerve regeneration in rats. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014;8:454–462. doi: 10.1002/term.1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Niimi Y, et al. A collagen-coated PGA conduit for interpositional-jump graft with end-to-side neurorrhaphy for treating facial nerve paralysis in rat. Microsurgery. 2019;39:70–80. doi: 10.1002/micr.30291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shimizu Mari, Matsumine Hajime, Osaki Hironobu, Ueta Yoshifumi, Tsunoda Satoshi, Kamei Wataru, Hashimoto Kazuki, Niimi Yosuke, Watanabe Yorikatsu, Miyata Mariko, Sakurai Hiroyuki. Adipose‐derived stem cells and the stromal vascular fraction in polyglycolic acid‐collagen nerve conduits promote rat facial nerve regeneration. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2018;26(6):446–455. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kamei Wataru, Matsumine Hajime, Osaki Hironobu, Ueta Yoshifumi, Tsunoda Satoshi, Shimizu Mari, Hashimoto Kazuki, Niimi Yosuke, Miyata Mariko, Sakurai Hiroyuki. Axonal supercharged interpositional jump-graft with a hybrid artificial nerve conduit containing adipose-derived stem cells in facial nerve paresis rat model. Microsurgery. 2018;38(8):889–898. doi: 10.1002/micr.30389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Niimi Y, et al. Effectively Axonal-supercharged Interpositional Jump-Graft with an Artificial Nerve Conduit for Rat Facial Nerve Paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e416. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Matsumine H, et al. Unilateral Multiple Facial Nerve Branch Reconstruction Using “End-to-side Loop Graft” Supercharged by Hypoglossal Nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2:e240. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matsuda K, et al. A new model of end-to-side nerve graft for multiple branch reconstruction: end-to-side cross-face nerve graft in rats. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1357–1367. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ito H, et al. Healing efficacy of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) seed oil in an ovine burn wound model. Burns. 2014;40:511–519. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Wenger KH, Claes LE. Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine. Anatomical Record. 1997;247:542–555. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199704)247:4&#x0003c;542::AID-AR13&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Enkhbaatar P, et al. Pathophysiology, research challenges, and clinical management of smoke inhalation injury. Lancet. 2016;388:1437–1446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31458-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Asmussen S, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells reduce the severity of acute lung injury in a sheep model of bacterial pneumonia. Thorax. 2014;69:819–825. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Niimi, Y. et al. Surgical anatomy of ovine facial and hypoglossal nerves for facial nerve reconstruction and regeneration research: An experimental study in sheep. Microsurgery, 10.1002/micr.30405 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Sasaki R, et al. Surgical anatomy of the swine face. Lab Anim. 2010;44:359–363. doi: 10.1258/la.2010.009127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mattox DE, Felix H. Surgical anatomy of the rat facial nerve. Am J Otol. 1987;8:43–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.May, N. D. S. Anatomy of the sheep. 3rd ed edn, (University of Queensland Press, 1970).
  • 19.Solomon LB, Ferris L, Tedman R, Henneberg M. Surgical anatomy of the sural and superficial fibular nerves with an emphasis on the approach to the lateral malleolus. J Anat. 2001;199:717–723. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19960717.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mahakkanukrauh P, Chomsung R. Anatomical variations of the sural nerve. Clin Anat. 2002;15:263–266. doi: 10.1002/ca.10016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ortiguela ME, Wood MB, Cahill DR. Anatomy of the sural nerve complex. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12:1119–1123. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80129-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim ED, Seo JT. Minimally invasive technique for sural nerve harvesting: technical description and follow-up. Urology. 2001;57:921–924. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)00908-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kakibuchi M, et al. End-to-side nerve graft for facial nerve reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:496–500. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000116283.76872.de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hayashi A, et al. Hemihypoglossal nerve transfer for acute facial paralysis. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:160–166. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sasaki, R., Matsumine, H., Watanabe, Y., Yamato, M. & Ando, T. Surgical anatomy of the sural nerve for peripheral nerve reconstruction research in swine. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Sciences (2016).
  • 26.Riedl O, Frey M. Anatomy of the Sural Nerve: Cadaver Study and Literature Review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2013;131:802–810. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818cd4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chentanez V, Cha-oumphol P, Kaewsema A, Agthong S, Huanmanop T. Morphometric data of normal sural nerve in Thai adults. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89:670–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jacobs JM, Love S. Qualitative and quantitative morphology of human sural nerve at different ages. Brain. 1985;108(Pt 4):897–924. doi: 10.1093/brain/108.4.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Behse F. Morphometric studies on the human sural nerve. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1990;132:1–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hembd A, et al. Correlation between facial nerve axonal load and age and its relevance to facial reanimation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017;139:1459–1464. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jacobs JM, Laing JHE, Harrison DH. Regeneration through a long nerve graft used in the correction of facial palsy - A qualitative and quantitative study. BRAIN. 1996;119:271–279. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.1.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kullman GL, Dyck PJ, Cody DT. Anatomy of the mastoid portion of the facial nerve. Arch Otolaryngol. 1971;93:29–33. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1971.00770060061005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dvali L, Mackinnon S. Nerve repair, grafting, and nerve transfers. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30:203–221. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1298(02)00096-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Eppley BL, Snyders RV., Jr. Microanatomic analysis of the trigeminal nerve and potential nerve graft donor sites. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49:612–618. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90343-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mackinnon SE, et al. Selection of optimal axon ratio for nerve regeneration. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23:129–134. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198908000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Terzis JK, Wang W, Zhao Y. Effect of axonal load on the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the cross-facial nerve graft procedure for facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1499–1512. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181babb93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Weber, R. A., Breidenbach, W. C., Brown, R. E., Jabaley, M. E. & Mass, D. P. A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg106, 1036–1045; discussion 1046–1038 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Sasaki R, et al. PLGA artificial nerve conduits with dental pulp cells promote facial nerve regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011;5:823–830. doi: 10.1002/term.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kitahara AK, et al. Facial nerve repair using a collagen conduit in cats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999;33:187–193. doi: 10.1080/02844319950159442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moore AM, et al. Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: a comparative study. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44:221–234. doi: 10.1002/mus.22033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Whitlock EL, et al. Processed allografts and type I collagen conduits for repair of peripheral nerve gaps. Muscle Nerve. 2009;39:787–799. doi: 10.1002/mus.21220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Watanabe Yorikatsu, Sasaki Ryo, Matsumine Hajime, Yamato Masayuki, Okano Teruo. Undifferentiated and differentiated adipose-derived stem cells improve nerve regeneration in a rat model of facial nerve defect. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2014;11(2):362–374. doi: 10.1002/term.1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sasaki R, et al. Electrophysiologic and functional evaluations of regenerated facial nerve defects with a tube containing dental pulp cells in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:970–978. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cattin AL, et al. Macrophage-Induced Blood Vessels Guide Schwann Cell-Mediated Regeneration of Peripheral Nerves. Cell. 2015;162:1127–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Navissano M, Malan F, Carnino R, Battiston B. Neurotube for facial nerve repair. Microsurgery. 2005;25:268–271. doi: 10.1002/micr.20128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ray WZ, Mackinnon SE. Management of nerve gaps: autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Exp Neurol. 2010;223:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES