Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of septic arthritis (SA) relies on synovial analysis and conventional culture. But, these methods lack of sensitivity and culture is time consuming to establish a definite diagnosis. This study evaluated a new multiplex PCR assay which entailed screening PCR for Gram typing and identification PCR for species identification using two primer mixes. Methods: A total of 80 synovial fluid samples from patients with suspected SA were collected. Culture, multiplex PCR, and 16S rRNA gene PCR were performed. Results: The analytical sensitivity of multiplex PCR assay was 101 CFU/ml for each type of bacteria. There was no cross‐reactivity with common bacterial pathogens. Bacteria were detected in 20, 25, and 26 of 80 samples for culture, multiplex PCR, and 16S rRNA gene PCR, respectively. Nineteen (95%) of 20 culture‐positivesamples and 6 (10%) of 60 culture‐negative samples were positive for the multiplex PCR. Five of six samples which were positive only from multiplex PCR were also positive in 16S rRNA gene PCR. The multiplex PCR showed 2 false‐negative in 27 true‐positive samples but no false‐positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex PCR were 92.6 and 100%, and the agreement with culture and 16S rRNA gene PCR were 91.3 and 96.3%, respectively. The time to detection for multiplex PCR was a maximum of 6 hr. Conclusion: This multiplex PCR assay offers high sensitivity and improved detection speed relative to culture. The appropriate combination of this new multiplex PCR assay with culture may contribute to the accurate and rapid diagnosis of SA. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 24:175–181, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords: culture, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, septic arthritis
REFERENCES
- 1. Faraj AA, Omonbude OD, Godwin P. Gram staining in the diagnosis of acute septic arthritis. Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68:388–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kaandrop CJ, Krijnen P, Moens JH, et al. The outcome of bacterial arthritis: a prospective community‐based study. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:884–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. van der Heijden IM, Wilbrink B, Vije AEM, et al. Detection of bacterial DNA in serial synovial samples obtained during antibiotic treatment from patients with septic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:2198–2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ni H, Knight AI, Cartwright K, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of meningoccal meningitis. Lancet 1992;340:1432–1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Benslimani A, Fenollar F, Lepidi H, et al. Bacterial zoonoses and infective endocarditis, Algeria. Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11:216–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hykin PG, Tobal K, McIntyre G, et al. The diagnosis of delayed post‐operative endophthalmitis by polymerase chain reaction of bacterial DNA in vitreous samples. J Med Microbiol 1994;40:408–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Fenollar FR, Veronique R, Andreas S, et al. Analysis of 525 samples to determine the usefulness of PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for diagnosis of bone and joint infections. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:1018–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Yang S, Ramachandran P, Hardick A, et al. Rapid PCR‐based diagnsis of septic arthritis by early gram‐type classification and pathogen identification. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:1386–1390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, et al. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991;173:697–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shirtliff ME, Mader JT. Acute septic arthritis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15:527–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Morgan DS, Fisher D, Merianos A, et al. An 18 year clinical review of septic arthritis from tropical Anstralia. Epidemiol Infect 1996;117:423–428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ryan MJ, Kavanagh R, Wall PG, et al. Bacterial joint infections in England and Wales: analysis of bacterial isolates over a four year period. Br J Rheumatol 1997;36:370–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Harris KA, Hartley JC. Development of broad‐range 16S rDNA PCR for use in the routine diagnostic clinical microbiology service. J Med Microbiol 2003;52:685–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sakai H, Procop GW, Kobayashi N, et al. Simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase‐negative Staphylococci in positive blood cultures by real‐time PCR with two fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe sets. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:5739–5744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kobayashi N, Bauer TW, Sakai H, et al. The use of newly developed real‐time PCR for the rapid identification of bacteria in culture‐negative osteomyelitis. Joint Bone Spine 2006;73:745–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yang S, Lin S, Kelen GD, et al. Quantitative multiprobe PCR assay for simultaneous detection and identification to species level of bacterial pathogen. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:3449–3454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jalava J, Skurnik M, Toivanen P, et al. Bacterial PCR in the diagnosis of joint infection. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:287–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, et al. Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3281–3290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]