Abstract
Chronic periodontitis is associated with systemic diseases such as atherosclerosis. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of serum IgG antibody titer to periodontal bacteria for prognosis of periodontitis recurrence during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) phase. The 139 patients during SPT phase were selected and divided to two groups as follows: “Stable” and “Recurrence” group at SPT phase for case–control study: “High IgG titer” and “Normal IgG titer” group before transition to SPT phase for cohort study. We examined whether clinical findings or serum IgG antibody titers to periodontal bacteria are risk factors for the development of periodontitis recurrence. Case–control study showed thatthere were significant differences between the stable and recurrence groups in age and number of teeth. The serum IgG antibody titer to Eikenella corrodens FDC1073, Porphyromonas gingivalis SU63, and Campylobacter rectus ATCC33238 was significantly higher in the recurrence group. Next, we found, that the recurrence ratio in the high IgG titer group to Gram‐negative obligate anaerobe, Prevotella intermedia, Treponema denticola, and C. rectus was significantly higher than that of the normal IgG titer group. Taken together, serum IgG antibody titer test is useful in the prognosis of periodontitis recurrence during the SPT phase. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 25:25–32, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords: serum IgG antibody titer, periodontitis recurrence, supportive periodontal therapy
INTRODUCTION
Chronic periodontitis is a polymicrobial infectious disease 1 and the disease may result in loss of teeth by inflammation‐mediated bone resorption. More than 300 individual cultivable species of microbes have been identified in the human mouth 2, 3. Recurrence of periodontitis caused by insufficient periodontal maintenance may lead to poor oral health, and result in tooth loss. Therefore, in order to prevent the recurrence of the disease after periodontal treatment, it is important to establish the efficient methods for prediction. Recently, many researchers have reported that chronic periodontitis resulting from persistent low‐grade infection of Gram‐negative bacteria is associated with increased atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, and other systemic diseases disseminated through blood stream 4, 5. Therefore, as the infection control is very important for general health, it should be evaluated by appropriate laboratory clinical tests focused on microbial infection.
The microbiological examinations for periodontitis have been available to dental clinicians since the end of the 1980s 6. It has been generally accepted that infection with periodontal bacteria leads to humoral immunological responses and elevates the levels of serum IgG antibody to the bacteria 7, 8. There are various reports regarding the usefulness of the serum IgG antibody titer against periodontal bacteria to evaluate the treatment effects for periodontitis 9, 10. As serum IgG antibody levels correspond to the amount of periodontal bacteria, the effects of treatments focused on elimination of bacteria could be evaluated by decrease of serum IgG titer to the pathogens.
Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is an integral part of periodontal treatment, and is essential to prevent the recurrence of the disease in susceptible individuals, because periodontitis is frequently recurrent even after the intensive treatment 11. In general, clinically, several risk factors for the susceptibility of periodontitis recurrence are evaluated during the SPT phase, including: (i) the prevalence of residual periodontal pockets, (ii) tooth loss, (iii) the systemic conditions in each patient, and (iv) environmental or behavioral factors such as smoking 12. Basically, these factors should be considered and evaluated together for prognosis of periodontitis recurrence. Determining the risk for periodontitis recurrence during SPT phase would help the clinician to customize the frequency and contents of SPT visits. As chronic periodontitis is an infectious disease, it is important to evaluate the infection levels of periodontal pathogens. However, the current test for evaluating the level during SPT phase is not clinically useful, so establishment of convenient diagnosis system for the prognosis of periodontitis recurrence is needed.
In this study, we propose a new method for the prognosis of periodontitis recurrence during SPT phase using measurements of serum IgG antibody titer against periodontal pathogens. To show the clinical usefulness of serum IgG antibody titer for prognosis of the disease, we analyzed the relationship of several clinical data and serum IgG antibody titer to periodontitis recurrence during SPT. This examination will help to identify the most appropriate approach to SPT for individual patients to prevent the periodontitis recurrence. We believe our approach contributes to promotion of general health in the future.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Population
The subjects included 139 (male: 34, female: 105, average age: 61.4±10.4) chronic periodontitis patients at the Department of Periodontics and Endodontics, Okayama University Hospital of Medicine and Dentistry. The patients received intensive periodontal treatment followed by SPT for more than 1 year.
Informed consent was obtained from each subject, and the protocol for the evaluation of serum IgG titer has been approved by the institutional review board. The intensive periodontal treatment include scaling, root planning under infiltration anesthesia, and periodontal surgeries at one or more sites. SPT procedures included re‐motivation, plaque control guidance, scaling and root planning, and removal of local environmental factors at intervals of a few months. Patients with systemic diseases such as diabetes were excluded from this study because of the elevated risk factors for periodontal diseases. A detailed breakdown of the criteria for inclusion and exclusion in this study is presented below.
Inclusion Criteria
-
1.
Adult patients with chronic periodontitis.
-
2.
Patients with chronic periodontitis, treated by means of scaling and root planning and/or periodontal surgery, and in SPT phase for at least 1 year.
-
3.
Patients systemically healthy, and without relevant chronic medication intake.
Exclusion Criteria
-
1.
Pregnant women or in lactation.
-
2.
Systemic antibiotic intake. Frequent use of anti‐inflammatory drugs.
-
3.
Patients with systemic diseases.
-
4.
Three or more periodontal pockets with ≥6 mm
-
5.
Additionally, other habits, such as smoking, were recorded by a directed interview, as well as any relevant systemic condition or medication intake.
Preparation of Bacterial Antigens
Ultrasonic extract antigens were used for antigen samples of periodontal bacteria. The bacteria were allowed to reach maturity in pure cultures, using agar plate and liquid media, and diluted with phosphate‐buffered saline solution (PBS). After the bacterial cells were sonicated to destroy cellular membranes, each bacterial solution sonicated were centrifuged at 12,000g for 20 min to obtain the supernatants. These bacteria included: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Y4, A. actinomycetemcomitans ATCC29523, A. actinomycetemcomitans SUNY67, Capnocytophaga ochracea S3, Eikenerra corrodens FDC1073, Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC25586, Prevotella intermedia ATCC33563, P. intermedia ATCC25611, Porphyromonas gingivalis FDC381, P. gingivalis SU63, Treponem denticola ATCC35405, and Campylobacter rectus ATCC33238.
Measurement of the Serum IgG Antibody Titer to Periodontal Bacteria
The levels of serum IgG antibody titer against periodontal bacteria were measured before transition to SPT phase, and once or twice a year during SPT phase.
The amount of serum IgG that bound to each pathogenic bacteria antigen causing periodontitis was measured by ELISA as described previously 8. Briefly, each antigen was diluted to 10 µg/ml with 0.1 M carbonate buffer (pH 9.6). A portion of this diluted solution (100 µl) was then added to each well in a flat‐bottomed microtiter plate (Greiner Co., Ltd., Frickenhausen, Germany) and the plate was stored overnight at 4°C. Each well with immobilized antigen was washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.05% Tween‐20 (PBST). Subsequently, a diluted serum sample (3,100‐fold dilution with PBST) was added to each well. After incubation at 37°C for 2 hrr, each well was washed three times with PBST and bound/free (B/F) separation was carried out. Next, a 100 µl portion of 1:5,000 diluted alkaline phosphatase‐conjugated goat antihuman IgG antibody (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, Inc., Baltimore, MD) was added to each well. After incubation at 37°C for 2 hr, each well was washed three times with PBST and B/F separation was carried out. Thereafter, 50 µl of p‐nitrophenyl phosphate (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) adjusted to 1 mg/ml with 10% diethanolamine buffer (pH 9.8) was added to each well as substrate. The plate was then incubated at room temperature for 10–20 min. The enzymatic reaction was terminated by adding 50 µl of 3N NaOH and optical density (measurement at 405 nm; reference at 490 nm) was measured in a Micro ELISA Auto Reader (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
The sera from ten healthy subjects (age: 20–29 yr) were pooled and used as the calibrator of analysis. Using serial dilutions (1:12.5, 1:50, 1:200, 1:800, 1:3,200, 1:12,800, and 1:51,200) of this pooled control plasma, standard titration curves were prepared. The absorbance of each sample after reaction was defined as ELISA unit (EU), so that 100 EU corresponds to 1:3,200 dilution of the calibrator sample. For clinical use, the following formula was applied to the EU to calculate the diagnostic standardized value: standardized value=(IgG titer of patient−mean IgG titer of healthy subjects)/2 standard deviation (SD) determined by mean IgG titer of ten healthy subjects.
Classification of Subjects and Statistical Analysis
At 2 years during SPT after periodontal healing, subjects were classified into a “Recurrence group” (with recurrence or progression of periodontitis) and a “Stable group” (without recurrence or progression of periodontal disease) for a case–control study (Fig. 1A). Patients with three or more deepening periodontal pockets with a depth of 3 mm or more after the transition to SPT phase were judged to be “with periodontitis recurrence or progression,” based on the report of Levine et al. 13. Trained dentists performed the examination of clinical findings (age, number of teeth, plaque control record (PCR), bleeding on probing (BOP), and periodontal pocket depth by pocket probing), and a supervisory doctor checked it so that there was no difference in technique among attending dentists. PCR was examined using O'Leary plaque index 14. Significant differences between each group were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U‐test.
Figure 1.

Experimental protocol (A) A case–control study. At 2 years during SPT after intensive periodontal treatment, subjects were classified into a “Recurrence group” (with recurrence or progression of periodontitis, N=112) and a “Stable group” (without recurrence or progression of periodontal disease, N=27). Significant differences between each group were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U‐test. (B) A cohort study. At the beginning of the SPT phase, subjects were classified into “High serum IgG titer” and “Normal serum IgG titer” group in each strain of periodontal bacteria. Significant differences of periodontitis recurrence ratio within 2 years after intensive periodontal treatment between each group were analyzed by Pearson's χ2 test.
Secondly, subjects were classified into “High IgG titer” and “Normal IgG titer” group in serum IgG antibody titer against periodontal bacteria at the beginning of the SPT phase for a cohort study (Fig. 1B). Patients exhibiting IgG antibody titer levels significantly (>2σ) above the average among healthy volunteers are defined as having high‐level serum IgG antibody titer against periodonopathic bacteria. Significant differences of periodontitis recurrence ratio between each group were analyzed by Pearson's χ2 test.
For statistical analysis, computer software Statview 5.0 (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA) was used.
RESULTS
Clinical Findings of Patients Before SPT Phase
Chronic periodontitis of all patients were treated by intensive periodontal treatment. The healing was evaluated by trained dentists using routine periodontal examination methods (periodontal pocket depth, BOP, and X‐ray). A total of 139 patients during SPT phase were analyzed for case–control study (Stable group: 112, Recurrence group: 27). Clinical findings of patients before SPT phase are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the stable and recurrence group in the score of their PCR, BOP, and even averaged probing pocket depth. On the other hand, there were significant differences between the stable and recurrence groups in their age and number of teeth (age, P=0.026: number of teeth, P=0.025: Mann–Whitney U‐test).
Table 1.
Clinical Findings at the Beginning of SPT Phase
| Stable group (N=112) | Recurrence group (N=27) | P‐value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 60.2±10.6 | 67.0±8 1 | 0.026* |
| Number of teeth | 22.0±6.3 | 17.2±82 | 0.025* |
| PCR (%) | 21.5±15.1 | 22.4±13.0 | 0.775 |
| BOP (%) | 11.3±11.0 | 13.9±87 | 0.224 |
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.30±0.3 | 2.50±0 5 | 0.158 |
| SPT period (month) | 48.9±12.4 | 51.8±12.5 | 0.362 |
Clinical findings excluding SPT period were examined at the beginning of SPT phase. PCR, Plaque control record; BOP, Bleeding on probing.
*Significant difference (P<0.05, Mann–Whitney U‐test) between stable and recurrence group. Values represent the mean±standard deviation (SD).
Statistical Differences Between the Stable and Recurrence Group in Serum IgG Antibody Titer Before Transition to SPT Phase
In 12 strains from 8 bacterial species, average of serum IgG antibody titer against all of periodontal bacteria before transition to SPT phase in the recurrence group was higher than that of the stable group (Fig. 2). Especially, the levels of serum IgG antibody titer to several periodontal bacteria were statistically higher in the recurrence group than that of the stable group before transition to SPT phase (A. actinomycetemcomitans Y4, P=0.020: E. corrodens ATCC1073, P=0.040: P. gingivalis SU63, P=0.020: C. rectus ATCC33238, P=0.025: Mann–Whitney U‐test). The serum IgG antibody titer against T. denticola ATCC35405 was also clearly higher in the recurrence group than in the stable group (P=0.081: Mann–Whitney U‐test) before transition to SPT phase.
Figure 2.

The levels of serum IgG antibody titer against 12 periodontal bacteria. The significant differences between “Stable” and “Recurrence” group were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U‐test. Each dot represents an individual data tested by ELISA assay. The Y‐axis (IgG Titer) in each panel denotes the value determined as (serum IgG titer tested by ELISA)−(mean titer calculated using that of healthy subjects)/(2 SD calculated using that of healthy subjects) as described in Materials and Methods section. Ave, average of IgG Titer: each data have calculated and shown as average±SD. * P<0.05. Aa, A. actinomycetemcomitans; Co, C. ochracea; Ec, E. corrodens; Fn, F. nucleatum; Pi, P. intermedia; Pg, P. gingivalis; Td, T. denticola; Cr, C. rectus.
Statistical Differences Between the High and Normal Serum IgG Titer Group in Periodontitis Recurrence
In a cohort study, the patients were categorized into two groups according to their serum IgG antibody titer levels associated with the eight known periodontal bacteria. In the “normal” group, the level of serum IgG antibody titer was observed to be lower than 1.0 against each type of bacteria at the beginning of the SPT phase. In the “high” group, the level of serum IgG antibody titer exceeds 1.0 against periodontal bacteria. As shown in Table 2, importantly, we found that there were no significant differences between the Normal and High serum IgG antibody titer group in all clinical findings. From these clinical data, we confirmed to become healthy clinically in both groups by active periodontal treatment. Furthermore, we observed the tendency that the recurrence ratio of the high serum IgG titer group was higher than that of the normal group (Normal group: 14.9–19.0 %, High group: 20.5–36.8 %). Especially, the recurrence ratio of the high IgG titer group to three obligate anaerobic bacteria was statistically higher than that of the normal titer group (P. intermedia ATCC25611, P=0.021; T. denticola ATCC35405, P=0.039; C. rectus ATCC33238, P=0.048: Pearson's χ2 test). In addition, the recurrence ratio of the high titer group against P. gingivalis SU63 was higher than that of the normal titer group, although there was no statistical difference (P=0.083: Pearson's χ2 test). Furthermore, we examined the combined recurrence ratio in high IgG antibody titer against 12 periodontal bacteria, and the periodontitis recurrence ratio of the high titer group was greater than that of the normal titer group (High titer group: 21.6 % (N=97), Normal titer group: 14.3% (N=42), P=0.339, Pearson's χ2 test).
Table 2.
Clinical Findings After Periodontitis Treatment and Reccurrence Ratio During SPT
| Strains | Examination | Normal laG titer | High IgG titer | P‐value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facultative anaerobic | Aa Y4 | Patients number | 104 | 35 | |
| Age (yr) | 60.1±10.7 | 64.0±9.2 | 0.16 | ||
| Number of teeth | 21.8 | 20 | 0.17 | ||
| PCR (%) | 21.3 | 25.7 | 0.47 | ||
| BOP (%) | 11.7 | 14.4 | 0.51 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.32 | 2.29 | 0.66 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.079 | 2.51 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 17.3 | 25.7 | 0.28 | ||
| Aa ATCC29523 | Patients number | 107 | 35 | ||
| Age (yr) | 61.2±10.6 | 61.5±10.3 | 0.92 | ||
| Number of teeth | 22.2 | 19.2 | 0.085 | ||
| PCR (%) | 22.7 | 21.6 | 0.54 | ||
| BOP (%) | 12.4 | 12.4 | 0.79 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.28 | 2.41 | 0.39 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.11 | 2.69 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 16.8 | 28.1 | 0.16 | ||
| Ec FDC1073 | Patients number | 82 | 57 | ||
| Age (yr) | 60.8±10.4 | 61.6±10.5 | 0.69 | ||
| Number of teeth | 22.1 | 20.2 | 0.064 | ||
| PCR (%) | 23.1 | 21.6 | 0.41 | ||
| BOP (%) | 12.4 | 12.2 | 0.63 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.31 | 2.33 | 0.89 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.11 | 2.64 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 15.9 | 24.6 | 0.21 | ||
| Obligate anaerobic | Pi ATCC25611* | Patients number | 115 | 24 | |
| Age (yr) | 61.3±10.1 | 61.1±12.5 | 0.93 | ||
| Number of teeth | 21.6 | 20.2 | 0.49 | ||
| PCR (%) | 22.3 | 23.3 | 0.84 | ||
| BOP (%) | 12.2 | 13.7 | 0.51 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.31 | 2.39 | 0.24 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.02 | 2.07 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 15.8 | 36.1 | 0.021 | ||
| Pg FDC381 | Patients number | 100 | 39 | ||
| Age (yr) | 61.7±10.5 | 60.1±10.5 | 0.56 | ||
| Number of teeth | 21.8 | 20.2 | 0.43 | ||
| PCR (%) | 23.1 | 21.3 | 0.39 | ||
| BOP (%) | 12.4 | 12.4 | 0.99 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.29 | 2.38 | 0.59 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.14 | 3.14 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 19.1 | 20.5 | 0.84 | ||
| Pg SU63 | Patients number | 113 | 26 | ||
| Age (yr) | 61.8±10.6 | 57.8±9.3 | 0.18 | ||
| Number of teeth | 21.2 | 22.1 | 0.99 | ||
| PCR (%) | 24.2 | 12.4 | 0.29 | ||
| BOP (%) | 13.1 | 9.1 | 0.15 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.31 | 2.33 | 0.95 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.004 | 3.13 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 16.8 | 36.1 | 0.083 | ||
| Td ATCC35405* | Patients number | 120 | 19 | ||
| Age (yr) | 61.1±10.2 | 61.3±12.3 | 0.88 | ||
| Number of teeth | 21.8 | 18.8 | 0.14 | ||
| PCR (%) | 23.3 | 17.8 | 0.24 | ||
| BOP (%) | 12.7 | 10.4 | 0.67 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.33 | 2.23 | 0.22 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.21 | 2.31 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 16.7 | 36.8 | 0.039 | ||
| Cr ATCC33238* | Patients number | 100 | 39 | ||
| Age (yr) | 61.5±10.1 | 60.6±11.4 | 0.79 | ||
| Number of teeth | 22.1 | 19.9 | 0.22 | ||
| PCR (%) | 22.1 | 23.3 | 0.76 | ||
| BOP (%) | 11.8 | 13.6 | 0.65 | ||
| Pocket depth (mm) | 2.26 | 2.42 | 0.13 | ||
| Serum IgG Ab. Titer | 0.02 | 3.67 | <0.0001 | ||
| Recurrence ratio (%) | 14.9 | 29.7 | 0.048 |
Data were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U‐test for clinical findings and Pearson's χ2 test for Recurrence ratio between “Normal” and “High” IgG titer group. *, P<0.05: The recurrence ratio in “High” IgG Titer group is significantly higher. Aa, A. actinomycetemcomitans; Ec, E. corrodens; Pi, P. intermedia; Pg, P. gingivalis; Td, T. denticola; Cr, C. rectus.
DISCUSSION
Periodontal disease is a common chronic infection caused by Gram‐negative bacteria such as P. gingivalis and P. intermedia 1. Recurrence of periodontitis may lead to poor oral health, and result in tooth loss. Therefore, in order to prevent the recurrence of the disease after periodontal treatment, it is important to establish the efficient methods for patients. Recently, epidemiological research provides strong evidence that periodontitis is a risk factor for systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disease 5, 6. A number of studies have reported that periodontal infection would be a risk factor for progression of myocardial infarction and stroke 15, 16. Therefore, persistent low‐grade infection by chronic periodontitis is also a focus for physicians.
This study is a part of our ongoing efforts to elucidate the clinical usefulness of serum IgG antibody titer to periodontal bacteria. In general, it is well recognized that periodontitis is a multifactorial disease 17, 18, 19. For example, a young patient developing periodontitis might be most likely a carrier of one or more genetic factors. Patients may also have one or more chronic systemic diseases associated with an increased risk for periodontitis. Therefore, it is difficult to identify the factors contributing to the onset, progression, and the recurrence of periodontitis following periodontal therapy.
Good control of supragingival plaque is important to prevent the periodontitis recurrence in SPT phase, after intensive periodontal treatment. However, our results have shown that the predictive value of routine periodontal parameters (PCR, BOP, and pocket probing depth) is relatively low (Table 1). Periodontal examinations we performed routinely did not provide clear predictions for the recurrence of periodontitis. This is not unexpected because routine periodontal examinations such as BOP and pocket probing depth primarily indicate the past reaction to inflamed periodontal tissue. As shown in Table 1, among the factors relating to the periodontitis recurrence during SPT phase, we found age of patients is one of the risk factors in the recurrence. With age, metabolism, restoration ability, and preventive ability of periodontal tissue cells are reduced irreversibly. Therefore, the risk of periodontitis recurrence might increase with the age of patients indirectly.
There have been reports that measurement of serum IgG antibody titer was useful for diagnosing periodontitis or judging the treatment effects 15. However, during the SPT phase following active periodontal treatment, the usefulness of the levels of serum IgG antibody titer was still unknown. We have proposed a new insight for the prognosis of periodontitis recurrence during SPT phase using serum IgG antibody titer. In this study, we analyzed the usefulness of the levels of serum IgG antibody titer in predicting the recurrence of periodontitis during SPT phase by multiple classification analysis. We used sonic extracts of whole bacterial cells as antigens for ELISA. As the bacterial antigens include various components, mainly protein, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and DNA, the serum IgG antibody titer against periodontal bacteria reflects total results of antibody responses 8.
Periodontitis is a bacterial infectious disease 17. The humoral responses against bacteria are largely different among individuals. The immunological response against specific bacteria should be clinically useful for evaluating the risk of periodontitis recurrence. Figure 2 shows the levels of serum IgG antibody titer against 12 periodontal bacteria before transition to SPT phase in the stable and recurrence group. Interestingly, although the levels of serum IgG antibody titer against all periodontal bacteria were variable, we found that the serum IgG antibody titer against several bacteria (A. actinomycetemcomitans Y4, E. corrodens ATCC1073, P. gingivalis SU63, and C. rectus ATCC33238) was significantly higher within the recurrence group than the stable group when in transition to SPT phase. These findings indicate that serum IgG antibody titer might be useful clinically as a diagnostic marker of periodontitis recurrence during SPT phase.
From another viewpoint, we examined the differences of the periodontitis recurrence ratio between the high and normal serum IgG antibody titer group when transition to SPT as a companion study. Interestingly, we observed the tendency that the recurrence ratio of the high serum IgG titer group was higher than that of the normal group as shown in Table 2. Especially, we found the recurrence ratio of the high titer group against several periodontal bacteria (P. intermedia ATCC25611, T. denticola ATCC35405, and C. rectus ATCC33238) was statistically higher than that of the normal titer group. Furthermore, we examined the combined recurrence ratio in high IgG antibody titer against 12 periodontal bacteria. Interestingly, we found that the periodontitis recurrence ratio of the high titer group was greater than that of the normal titer group. The combined periodontal bacteria might provide an effective clinical prognosis of periodontitis recurrence. Our findings indicate that the serum IgG antibody titer might be useful as a predicting marker of periodontitis recurrence during SPT phase. Also, Tolo et al. reported that the level of serum IgG antibody titer against P. gingivalis increases before absorption of alveolar bone, and could predict the progression of periodontitis 20. This report supports our concept.
According to recent studies, chronic periodontitis, persistent low‐grade infection of Gram‐negative bacteria, is associated with increased atherosclerosis, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and other systemic diseases through the blood stream 4, 5, 21. So poor oral health may have profound effect on general health; therefore, it is important to prevent the recurrence of periodontitis for health promotion practice.
We believe that SPT is effective for preventing the recurrence of periodontitis. In this study, we wanted to find the primary risk factors of periodontitis recurrence in patients after periodontal treatment. From multiple classification analysis on clinical findings and serum IgG antibody titers before transition to SPT phase, we elucidated the predictive markers for the recurrence of periodontitis in view of humoral immune responses to periodontal infection. We propose the attention should be focused on the levels of serum IgG antibody to periodontal bacteria when transition to SPT phase. Our findings show that elevated serum IgG antibody titer is an important marker to predict the periodontitis recurrence during the transition to SPT phase.
Acknowledgements
We greatly thank Scott Messenger at NASA Johnson Space Center for the revision of the manuscript and for encouragement in our research. This study was supported by Grant‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research (A) (No. 18209061) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants (Comprehensive Research on Aging and Health, H19‐Choju‐008) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.
REFERENCES
- 1. Listgarten MA, Loomer PM. Microbial identification in the management of periodontal diseases. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:182–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Shay K. Infectious complications of dental and periodontal diseases in the elderly population. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:1215–1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Paster BJ, Olsen I, Aas JA, Dewhirst FE. The breadth of bacterial diversity in the human periodontal pocket and other oral sites. Periodontol 2000 2006;42:80–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Seinost G, Wimmer G, Skerget M, et al. Periodontal treatment improves endothelial dysfunction in patients with severe periodontitis. Am Heart J 2005;149:1050–1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tonetti MS, D'Aiuto F, Nibali L, et al. Treatment of periodontitis and endothelial function. N Engl J Med 2007;356:911–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Aukhil I, Lopatin DE, Syed SA, Morrison EC, Kowalski CJ. The effects of periodontal therapy on serum antibody (IgG) levels to plaque microorganisms. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:544–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Guo S, Takahashi K, Kokeguchi S, Takashiba S, Kinane DF, Murayama Y. Antibody responses against Porphyromonas gingivalis infection in patients with early‐onset periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:769–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Takahashi K, Ohyama H, Kitanaka M, et al. Heterogeneity of host immunological risk factors in patients with aggressive periodontitis. J Periodontol 2001;72:425–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sims TJ, Schifferle RE, Ali RW, Skaug N, Page RC. Immunoglobulin G response of periodontitis patients to Porphyromonas gingivalis capsular carbohydrate and lipopolysaccharide antigens. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2001;16:193–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lamster IB, Kaluszhner‐Shapira I, Herrera‐Abreu M, Sinha R, Grbic JT. Serum IgG antibody response to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis: Implications for periodontal diagnosis. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:510–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Renvert S, Persson GR. Supportive periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000 2004;36:179–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mombelli A. Antimicrobial profiles of periodontal pathogens and systemic antimicrobial therapy. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:891–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Levine M, LaPolla S, Owen WL, Socransky SS. Antibody‐based diagnostic for “refractory” periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:935–943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Checchi L, Forteleoni G, Pelliccioni GA, Loriga G. Plaque removal with variable instrumentation. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:715–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dietrich T, Jimenez M, Krall Kaye EA, Vokonas PS, Garcia RI. Age‐dependent associations between chronic periodontitis/edentulism and risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation 2008;117:1668–1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Palm F, Urbanek C, Grau A. Infection, its treatment and the risk for stroke. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2009;7:146–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wolff L, Dahlen G, Aeppli D. Bacteria as risk markers for periodontitis. J Periodontol 1994;65:498–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Van Winkelhoff AJ, Boutaga K. Transmission of periodontal bacteria and models of infection. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:16–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shapira L, Wilensky A, Kinane DF. Effect of genetic variability on the inflammatory response to periodontal infection. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:72–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tolo K. Periodontal disease mechanisms in immunocompromised patients. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:431–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Moutsopoulos NM, Madianos PN. Low‐grade inflammation in chronic infectious diseases: Paradigm of periodontal infections. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1088:251–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
