Abstract
Novel ring-opening reactions are achieved employing benzofuroxan as a new type of iminating or aminating reagent. These diverse transformations give access to three types of molecular scaffolds, N-aryl dimethylsulfoximines, methanesulfonamides, and hemiaminal ethers, which are important structural motifs in organic and medicinal chemistry. The procedures feature solvent-involved reactions, easily available starting materials, operational simplicity, high atom economy, and the potential further transformation of nitro group.
Introduction
Solvent-involved reactions have drawn considerable interest owing to the rather low cost, relative stability, and low toxicity of solvents. In the past decades, numerous procedures using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)1 or tetrahydrofuran (THF) as versatile reagents have been developed.2 Sulfoximines have attracted a great deal of attention owing to their remarkable biological activities3 and successful use as ligands and auxiliaries in asymmetrical synthesis, structural units in pseudopeptides, and directing groups for catalytic C–H functionalizations.4 Two regular routes for the preparation of sulfoximines involve an oxidative imination of a sulfoxide and a nucleophilic substitution of the corresponding sulfonimidoyl halide or sulfonimidate.5 Transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between aryl halides or pseudohalides and N-unsubstituted sulfoximines have been established for the formation of N-aryl sulfoximines in recent years.6 On the other hand, hemiaminal ethers are the commonly found structural motifs in many biologically active natural products and pharmaceutical agents.7 Although some traditional methods have been developed for the construction of these skeletal structures, current interest focused on the direct amination of C(sp33)–H bonds adjacent to an oxygen atom under transition-metal catalysis or metal-free conditions.8 This strategy circumvented the preinstallation of functional groups with high atom and step economy. Despite the significant advancement, the development of powerful and complementary transformations for sulfoximine and hemiaminal ether synthesis is still desirable.
Benzofuroxan (benzo[1,2-c]1,2,5-oxadiazole N-oxide, BFX) derivatives exhibit a broad biological activity, including antifungal, antileukemic, antibacterial, acaricidal, and immunodepressive properties.9 The traditional approaches used for the preparation of BFX included oxidation of o-nitroanilines and the tandem nucleophilic substitution/intramolecular cyclization of o-chloronitrobenzene with sodium azide in good yields.10 Hence, the BFX derivatives have been utilized as synthetic intermediates to react with rich electron species to produce heterocycle derivatives, through the Beirut reaction.11 Herein, we disclosed a direct imination of DMSO to N-(2-nitro)phenyl dimethylsulfoximines using benzofuroxans as aryliminating reagents (Scheme 1a).12 In the meantime, it was also demonstrated that methanesulfonamides could be synthesized in DMSO/H2O mixed solvent (Scheme 1b).13 It is important to note that although DMSO has been employed as a multipurpose precursor for carbon, sulfur, and oxygen sources for incorporation into target molecules, only few examples act as −SO2Me source.14 Furthermore, we reported a novel protocol for α-C–H amination with THF to hemiaminal ethers under ruthenium catalyst with benzofuroxans as the nitro and nitrogen sources (Scheme 1c).
Scheme 1. Diverse Transformations of Benzofuroxan with Different Solvents.
Results and Discussion
Initially, we employed benzofuroxan 1a in DMSO as a model reaction to screen the reaction conditions. As shown in Table 1, the reaction temperature is vital to the transformation, but below 100 °C, the reaction failed to produce the desired product (entry 1). When the reaction was carried out at higher temperature, it showed that 135 °C was suitable for this system (entries 2–4). We noted that the starting material was not consumed completely for 8 h, then the reaction time was examined, and good isolated yield was obtained for 16 h (entries 5–7). To our surprise, both sulfoximine 3a and methanesulfonamide 4a could be formed in similar yields when the reaction was proceeded in DMSO/H2O (3:1). Considering the importance of methanesulfonamide in the fields of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and materials, the optimal conditions were also investigated. It indicated that too much or too little water was detrimental to the formation of 4a, and equivalent amounts of DMSO and water afforded the best results (entries 8–11). After a few attempts, the suitable condition to sulfoximine is DMSO solvent and that to methanesulfonamide is DMSO/H2O (1:1) mixed solvent at 135 °C for 16 h.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa.
| yieldb (%) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | solvent | temp/°C | time/h | 3a | 4a |
| 1 | DMSO | 100 | 8 | n.p. | n.p. |
| 2 | DMSO | 120 | 8 | 13 | n.p. |
| 3 | DMSO | 135 | 8 | 70 | n.p. |
| 4 | DMSO | 145 | 8 | 71 | n.p. |
| 5 | DMSO | 135 | 12 | 76 | n.p. |
| 6 | DMSO | 135 | 16 | 87 | n.p. |
| 7 | DMSO | 135 | 20 | 87 | n.p. |
| 8c | DMSO/H2O | 135 | 16 | 35 | 33 |
| 9d | DMSO/H2O | 135 | 16 | 0 | 76 |
| 10e | DMSO/H2O | 135 | 16 | 0 | 65 |
| 11f | DMSO/H2O | 135 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
Reaction conditions: benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol) and solvent (1.2 mL).
Isolated yield.
The volume ratio of DMSO and H2O is 3:1.
DMSO/H2O (1:1).
DMSO/H2O (1:3).
DMSO/H2O (1:11). n.p. = no product.
With optimized reaction conditions available, we proceeded to evaluate the scope of the reaction. As illustrated in Scheme 2, a wide range of benzofuroxans underwent smoothly to furnish the corresponding products under the standard conditions. Benzofuroxans with electron-rich and electron-poor substituents were all compatible with this method (3b–3l). The substrates bearing a bulky tert-butyl group delivered the product in good yield (3d). To our delight, bromide- and iodide-substituted substrates can be smoothly converted into the corresponding iminating products, which provided opportunities for further coupling reactions under transition-metal-catalyzed conditions (3i and 3j). In addition, the substrates containing two substituents with the same or opposite electron nature were also tolerated and showed little effect on the efficiency (3c, 3h, 3k, and 3l). It should be noted that there was an interconversion of 1-oxide/3-oxide tautomers of benzofuroxan derivatives through the transient formation of an o-dinitroso intermediate; therefore, N-aryl sulfoximine isomers were obtained from asymmetrical substrate.15 Interestingly, the C5 products were the major products in most cases, irrespective of the C5- or C6-substituted benzofuroxan (3b, 3d–3g, and 3i). The ratios of C4 and C5 products were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. However, other sulfoxide derivatives such as diethylsulfoxide, dipropyl sulfoxide, and phenylmethyl sulfoxide were found to be unsuitable for this reaction, and no corresponding products were detected. Moreover, this imination reaction in a gram scale performed well and gave 3a in satisfactory yield (3a). The structure of 3a was further confirmed by X-ray crystal diffraction measurements (Figure 1).16 Following the above results, three examples for methanesulfonamide synthesis were demonstrated under DMSO/H2O solvent. Both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing benzofuroxans could be successfully transformed to the corresponding methanesulfonamides in good yields (4a–4c).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Sulfoximine or Methanesulfonamide Derivatives from Benzofuroxans,,,,,,,
Unless otherwise noted, reaction conditions: benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol) and DMSO (1.2 mL) at 135 °C for 16 h; yields of isolated products are given.
10 mmol scale of the reaction.
Raw material is C6-substituted benzofuroxan.
Raw material is C5-substituted benzofuroxan.
Only the major isomer is shown.
5-Chloro-6-methylbenzofuroxan was used as raw material.
5-Chloro-6-fluorobenzofuroxan was used as raw material.
Reaction conditions: benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol), DMSO (0.6 mL), and H2O (0.6 mL) at 135 °C for 16 h.
Figure 1.
X-ray crystal structures of 3a and 5f.
The reaction of benzofuroxan 1a and THF was explored to search for suitable conditions (Table 2). Various commonly used transition-metal catalysts were used to conduct this reaction. To our delight, we found that RuCl3 could render the corresponding product in 10% yield (entries 1–8). The reaction did not proceed without ruthenium salt (entry 9). Encouraged by these results, a number of other ruthenium catalysts were tested. The results showed that [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 displayed the highest catalytic activity for this reaction, and 5a was isolated in 72% yield (entries 10–13). The effect of reaction time was further examined, and the model reaction took place for 12 h, leading to the best yield of 5a (entries 13–15). Lower temperature was disadvantageous to this transformation (entry 16). Therefore, both ruthenium catalyst and reaction temperature are crucial for this transformation.
Table 2. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa.
| entry | catalyst | solvent | temp/°C | time/h | yieldb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pd(OAc)2 | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. |
| 2 | Pd(COD)Cl2 | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. |
| 3 | RhCl3 | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. |
| 4 | [Rh(COD)Cl]2 | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. |
| 5 | Ni(COD)2 | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. |
| 6 | Co(OAc)2 | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. |
| 7 | Pt(COD)Cl | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. |
| 8 | RuCl3 | THF | 80 | 12 | 10 |
| 9 | THF | 80 | 12 | n.p. | |
| 10 | Ru(acac)3 | THF | 80 | 12 | trace |
| 11 | Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 | THF | 80 | 12 | trace |
| 12 | Ru(phen)3Cl2 | THF | 80 | 12 | trace |
| 13 | [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 | THF | 80 | 12 | 72 |
| 14 | [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 | THF | 80 | 9 | 65 |
| 15 | [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 | THF | 80 | 15 | 72 |
| 16 | [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 | THF | 60 | 12 | 55 |
Reaction conditions: benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol), THF (1 mL), and catalyst (2 mol %).
Isolated yield.
Subsequently, the scope of benzofuroxans was investigated for the present transformation using THF as a standard substrate (Scheme 3). A set of substituted benzofuroxans underwent ring-opening amination reaction smoothly (5b–5f). The symmetrical bisubstituted benzofuroxans yielded the products in optimized conditions. It can be inferred that the electron-donating groups are beneficial to the transformation compared to the electron-deficient groups (5b and 5c). In addition, unsymmetric monosubstituted benzofuroxans were applicable with excellent regioselectivity. Notably, these halide-substituted substrates were compatible under standard conditions, providing the possibility for further functionalization (5d–5f). Other cyclic ethers such as isochroman showed good reactivity to render the corresponding product in medium yield (5g). However, tetrahydropyran did not generate the desired product. Moreover, the exact structure of 5f was also confirmed by X-ray crystal diffraction measurements (Figure 1).17
Scheme 3. Ru-Catalyzed C–N Coupling of Benzofuroxans with Tetrahydrofuran or Isochroman,
Reaction conditions: benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol), THF or isochroman (1 mL), and [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (2 mol %) at 80 °C (oil bath temperature) for 12 h; yields of isolated products are given.
Raw material is C6-substituted benzofuroxan; only the major isomer of the product is shown.
To illustrate the synthetic utility of the sulfoximine, further transformation is investigated in Scheme 4. Starting from N-(2-nitro)phenyl dimethylsulfoximine 3a, the desired benzene-bridged aminosulfoximines 7 were prepared by a two-step reaction sequence. First, the nitro group of 3a was reduced to afford aniline 6a; subsequent aniline reacted readily with aromatic aldehydes to generate the target molecules 7 via reductive amination. It is noteworthy that chiral benzene-bridged benzylaminosulfoximines have been proved to be effective ligands for copper-catalyzed asymmetric Mukaiyama aldol reactions.18
Scheme 4. Preparation of Benzene-Bridged Benzylaminosulfoximines.
To probe the mechanism, some controlled experiments were carried out (Scheme 5). The deuterium-labeling experiments with DMSO-d6 demonstrated that dimethyl sulfoxide and methylsulfonyl moieties came from DMSO (Scheme 5a,b). Subsequently, the model reaction was performed under an argon atmosphere, and 4a was isolated in 86% yield (Scheme 5c). Additionally, the isotopic labeling experiment using H218O was conducted and 18O-labeled 4a was obtained in 70% yield (Scheme 5d). These results proved that the additional oxygen atom in 4a originated from H2O. No product was detected when 3a was subjected to H2O or DMSO/H2O; it suggested that 3a was not the intermediate for the formation of 4a (Scheme 5e). Radical trapping experiments were performed in the presence of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy or butylated hydroxytoluene. The yields just decreased slightly, which suggested that this should not be a radical pathway (Scheme 5f,g). Moreover, the reaction proceeded smoothly under argon atmosphere (Scheme 5h).
Scheme 5. Controlled Experiments.
On the basis of controlled experiments and earlier related literature, plausible mechanisms are proposed in Scheme 6. Initially, the nitrene intermediate A was formed through the retrocleavage of the furoxan ring at the N–O bond (Scheme 6, eq 1). Dimethyl sulfoxide reacted with the nitrene intermediate to yield the product 3a (Scheme 6, eq 2).19 Moreover, the Ru catalyst activated the C(sp3)–H bonds adjacent to the oxygen atom of THF and 5a was formed via the nitrene insertion and protodemetalation process (Scheme 6, eq 3).20 The possible mechanism for the formation of product 4a was unclear at the present stage.
Scheme 6. Possible Mechanism.
Conclusions
In summary, we have developed diverse transformations based on the reactions of benzofuroxans with DMSO or THF. The approach allowed facile access to three types of molecular scaffolds: N-aryl dimethylsulfoximines, methanesulfonamides, and hemiaminal ethers. The practical potential of the methodology was highlighted by transformation of the sulfoximines into aminosulfoximines. Further investigations on the synthetic applications and detailed mechanism are currently underway in our laboratory.
Experimental Section
General Information
1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on 400 and 100 MHz NMR spectrometers. The chemical shifts are referenced to signals at 7.26 and 77.0 ppm, respectively. Chloroform is the solvent with tetramethylsilane as the internal standard unless otherwise noted. Mass spectra were recorded on a GC-MS spectrometer at an ionization voltage of 70 eV equipped with a DB-WAX capillary column (internal diameter: 0.25 mm, length: 30 m). Elemental analyses were performed with a Vario EL elemental analyzer. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) (ion trap) were measured by electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry. Silica gel (300–400 mesh) was used for flash column chromatography, eluting (unless otherwise stated) with ethyl acetate (EA)/petroleum ether (PE) (60–90 °C) mixture.
General Procedure for the Preparation of Sulfoximines
A mixture of benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol) and DMSO (1.2 mL) was taken in a test tube (10 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. The mixture was stirred at 135 °C for 16 h under open atmosphere. After the reaction was complete, water (5 mL) was added and the solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL); the combined extract was dried with anhydrous MgSO4. Solvent was removed, and the residue was separated by column chromatography to give the pure sample.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Methanesulfonamides
A mixture of benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol), DMSO (0.6 mL), and water (0.6 mL) was taken in a test tube (10 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. The mixture was stirred at 135 °C for 16 h under open atmosphere. After the reaction was complete, water (5 mL) was added and the solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL); the combined extract was dried with anhydrous MgSO4. Solvent was removed, and the residue was separated by column chromatography to give the pure sample.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Hemiaminal Ethers
A mixture of benzofuroxan (0.2 mmol), [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (2 mol %), and THF (1.0 mL) was taken in a test tube (10 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. The mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 12 h under open atmosphere. After the reaction was complete, water (5 mL) was added and the solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL); the combined extract was dried with anhydrous MgSO4. Solvent was removed, and the residue was separated by column chromatography to give the pure sample.
N-[2-(Nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3a)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. White solid, 37 mg, yield: 87% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.05–7.00 (m, 1H), 3.16 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 145.8, 138.6, 132.4, 125.4, 124.2, 122.0, 42.4. MS (EI) m/z: 214, 136, 121, 104, 78, 63, 51. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C8H11N2O3S [M + H]+ 215.0485, found: 215.0476.
Mixture of N-[4 or 5-(Methyl)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3b)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow oil, 41 mg, yield: 90%, C4/C5 = 1:1.6 (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). C4–CH3 product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.44 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (s, 6H), 2.31 (s, 3H); C5–CH3 product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.58 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (dd, J = 8.4, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (s, 6H), 2.32 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 145.6, 143.7, 143.4, 138.7, 135.8, 133.3, 132.3, 126.1, 125.6, 124.5, 124.4, 122.9, 42.5, 42.3, 21.3, 20.3. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C9H13N2O3S [M + H]+ 229.0641, found: 229.0638.
N-[4,5-(Dimethyl)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3c)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 35 mg, yield: 72% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.50 (s, 1H), 7.14 (s, 1H), 3.16 (s, 6H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.22 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 143.3, 142.6, 136.2, 131.2, 127.1, 125.2, 42.4, 19.8, 18.9. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C10H15N2O3S [M + H]+ 243.0798, found: 243.0793.
Mixture of N-[4 or 5-(tert-Butyl)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3d)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 38 mg, yield: 70%, C4/C5 = 1:1.3 (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 6:1). C4–C4H9 product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.61 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (s, 6H), 1.28 (s, 9H); C5–C4H9 product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.62 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.16 (s, 6H), 1.29 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 156.8, 145.7, 145.4, 143.2, 138.5, 135.8, 129.7, 125.3, 124.2, 123.0, 120.9, 119.5, 42.4, 42.4, 34.9, 34.3, 31.0, 30.9. MS (EI) m/z: 270, 255, 192, 177, 148, 117, 91, 79, 63, 41. Anal. calcd for C12H18N2O3S: C, 53.31; H, 6.71; N, 10.36. Found: C, 53.04; H, 6.82; N, 10.44.
N-[5-(Methoxy)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3e)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 36 mg, yield: 73%, 1:8 (only the major isomer was shown, purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 3:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.77 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 162.9, 141.4, 138.8, 126.9, 109.9, 108.6, 55.7, 42.6. Anal. calcd for C9H12N2O4S: C, 44.25; H, 4.95; N, 11.47. Found: C, 44.03; H, 4.89; N, 11.56.
N-[5-(Fluoro)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3f)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. White solid, 41 mg, yield: 88%, 1:8 or 40 mg, yield: 86%, 1:20 (only the major isomer was shown, purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.72–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.11–7.08 (m, 1H), 6.73–6.68 (m, 1H), 3.20 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 164.2 (d, J = 253 Hz), 141.9, 141.4 (d, J = 11 Hz), 126.5 (d, J = 11 Hz), 111.8 (d, J = 24 Hz), 109.1 (d, J = 24 Hz), 42.7. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C8H10FN2O3S [M + H]+ 233.0391, found: 233.0395.
Mixture of N-[4 or 5-(Chloro)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3g)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. White solid, 42 mg, yield: 85%, 1:2.5 or 40 mg, yield: 81%, 1:2.8 (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). C4–Cl product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 2H), 3.16 (s, 6H); C5–Cl product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.59 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 145.6, 143.8, 140.1, 138.2, 137.4, 132.4, 126.7, 126.3, 125.4, 124.7, 124.1, 121.8, 42.6, 42.5. MS (EI) m/z: 248, 218, 170, 140, 112, 79, 63, 47. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C8H10ClN2O3S [M + H]+ 249.0095, found: 249.0109.
N-[4,5-(Dichloro)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3h)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 45 mg, yield: 80% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.52 (s, 1H), 3.20 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 143.9, 138.4, 136.8, 126.3, 125.7, 125.3, 42.8. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C8H9Cl2N2O3S [M + H]+ 282.9705, found: 282.9696.
Mixture of N-[4 or 5-(Bromo)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3i)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. White solid, 46 mg, yield: 78%, C4/C5 = 1:2 (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). C4–Br product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.76 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.28–7.26 (m, 1H), 3.17 (s, 6H); C5–Br product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.55–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.16–7.13 (m, 1H), 3.20 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 146.0, 144.4, 140.1, 137.9, 135.3, 127.9, 127.0, 126.7, 126.6, 125.5, 124.9, 113.7, 42.7, 42.6. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C8H10BrN2O3S [M + H]+ 292.9590, found: 292.9595.
Mixture of N-[4 or 5-(Iodo)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3j)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 50 mg, yield: 73%, C4/C5 = 3:1 (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). C4–I product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.90 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (s, 6H); C5–I product: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.75 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 2H), 3.19 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 146.2, 145.1, 141.1, 139.8, 138.6, 133.9, 132.6, 130.9, 126.9, 125.3, 99.0, 82.8, 42.7, 42.6. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C8H10IN2O3S [M + H]+ 340.9451, found: 340.9449.
N-[5-(Chloro)-4-(methyl)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3k)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 43 mg, yield: 83%, 20:1 (only the major isomer was shown, purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.40 (s, 1H), 3.18 (s, 6H), 2.33 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 143.9, 138.5, 137.4, 130.3, 126.0, 125.7, 426, 19.2. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C9H12ClN2O3S [M + H]+ 263.0252, found: 263.0249.
N-[4-(Chloro)-5-(fluoro)-2-(nitro)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (3l)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 42 mg, yield: 79%, 5:1 (only the major isomer was shown, purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.77 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 159.5 (d, J = 255 Hz), 139.9 (d, J = 11 Hz), 126.9, 126.6 (d, J = 12 Hz), 113.9 (d, J = 20 Hz), 112.5 (d, J = 23 Hz), 42.8. MS (EI) m/z: 266, 236, 188, 158, 142, 130, 79, 63, 47. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C8H9ClFN2O3S [M + H]+ 267.0001, found: 266.9998.
N-(2-Nitrophenyl)methanesulfonamide (4a)13
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 33 mg, yield: 76% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.76 (s, 1H), 8.27 (dd, J = 8.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.70–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.26–7.21 (m, 1H), 3.15 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 136.2, 134.3, 126.6, 123.6, 119.6, 119.5, 40.7. MS (EI) m/z: 216, 138, 108, 91, 79, 52.
N-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-nitrophenyl)methanesulfonamide (4b)13
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 34 mg, yield: 70% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.62 (s, 1H), 8.01 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 3.10 (s, 3H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.29 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.3, 134.5, 133.1, 131.9, 126.6, 120.7, 40.4, 20.5, 19.0. MS (EI) m/z: 244, 165, 149, 135, 118, 107, 91, 79, 65, 39.
N-(4,5-Dichloro-2-nitrophenyl)methanesulfonamide (4c)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 32 mg, yield: 56% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 4:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.72 (s, 1H), 8.38 (s, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 3.19 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 141.5, 134.5, 133.4, 127.7, 127.7, 120.7, 41.1. MS (EI) m/z: 284, 206, 176, 147, 112, 97, 79, 52. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C7H7Cl2N2O4S [M + H]+ 284.9498, found: 284.9495.
N-(2-Nitrophenyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-amine (5a)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow liquid, 30 mg, yield: 72% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.19 (s, 1H), 8.16 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.45 (m, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.77–6.73 (m, 1H), 5.52–5.48 (m, 1H), 3.95–3.92 (m, 2H), 2.42–2.34 (m, 1H) 2.18–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.05–1.90 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 143.9, 136.0, 132.9, 126.4, 117.0, 1157, 83.7, 67.0, 32.8, 24.8. MS (EI) m/z: 208, 138, 122, 92, 71, 43. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C10H12N2NaO3 [M + Na]+ 231.0740, found: 231.0779.
N-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-nitrophenyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-amine (5b)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 32 mg, yield: 67% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.12 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (s, 1H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 5.51–5.47 (m, 1H), 3.92 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.38–2.32 (m, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 2.13–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.03–1.86 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.1, 142.2, 130.8, 126.1, 126.1, 116.0, 83.7, 66.9, 32.8, 24.8, 20.6, 18.5. MS (EI) m/z: 236, 166, 136, 120, 91, 71, 43. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C12H16N2NaO3 [M + Na]+ 259.1053, found: 259.1057.
N-(4,5-Dichloro-2-nitrophenyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-amine (5c)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 26 mg, yield: 47% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (s, 1H), 5.43–5.39 (m, 1H), 3.95–3.91 (m, 2H), 2.42–2.35 (m, 1H), 2.16–2.11 (m, 1H), 2.05–1.89 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 142.7, 140.9, 131.4, 127.3, 120.6, 117.2, 83.7, 67.2, 32.8, 24.6. MS (EI) m/z: 276, 206, 109, 97, 71, 43. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C10H10Cl2N2NaO3 [M + Na]+ 298.9961, found: 298.9968.
N-(5-Fluoro-2-nitrophenyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-amine (5d)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow liquid, 25 mg, yield: 56%, 11:1 (only the major isomer was shown, purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.31 (s, 1H), 8.22–8.18 (m, 1H), 6.93–6.90 (m, 1H), 6.49–6.44 (m, 1H), 5.43–5.39 (m, 1H), 3.93 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.41–2.34 (m, 1H), 2.16–2.10 (m, 1H), 2.04–1.93 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 167.2 (d, J = 255 Hz), 146.2 (d, J = 14 Hz), 130.8, 129.5 (d, J = 12 Hz), 105.5 (d, J = 24 Hz), 101.8 (d, J = 27 Hz), 83.8, 67.1, 32.8, 24.7. MS (EI) m/z: 226, 150, 110, 83, 71, 43. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C10H12FN2O3 [M + H]+ 227.0826, found: 227.0823.
N-(5-Chloro-2-nitrophenyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-amine (5e)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 33 mg, yield: 68%, >20:1 (only the major isomer was shown, purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.22 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.45–5.41 (m, 1H), 3.93 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.40–2.33 (m, 1H), 2.15–2.09 (m, 1H), 2.03–1.92 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 144.4, 142.6, 131.4, 127.7, 117.5, 115.3, 83.6, 67.1, 32.8, 24.7. MS (EI) m/z: 242, 172, 105, 71, 43. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C10H12ClN2O3 [M + H]+ 243.0531, found: 243.0538.
N-(5-Iodo-2-nitrophenyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-amine (5f)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 40 mg, yield: 60%, >20:1 (only the major isomer was shown, purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.15 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 8.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.46–5.42 (m, 1H), 3.95–3.91 (m, 2H), 2.40–2.33 (m, 1H), 2.15–2.09 (m, 1H), 2.04–1.90 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 144.0, 132.4, 127.2, 126.3, 124.7, 104.7, 83.6, 67.2, 32.9, 24.7. MS (EI) m/z: 334, 264, 218, 130, 91, 71, 43. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C10H12IN2O3 [M + H]+ 334.9887, found: 334.9888.
N-(2-Nitrophenyl)isochroman-1-amine (5g)
The reaction was performed by following the general procedure. Yellow solid, 31 mg, yield: 57% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.42 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (dd, J = 8.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.85–6.81 (m, 1H), 6.16 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.16–4.09 (m, 1H), 3.97–3.92 (m, 1H), 3.08–3.00 (m, 1H), 2.81–2.75 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 143.4, 136.1, 134.6, 133.8, 133.2, 129.0, 128.4, 126.8, 126.6, 126.4, 117.4, 115.9, 79.0, 58.7, 28.0. MS (EI) m/z: 270, 220, 133, 115, 105, 79, 55. HRMS (ESI): calcd for C15H15N2O3 [M + H]+ 271.1077, found: 271.1081.
N-(2-Benzylaminophenyl)-S-dimethylsulfoximine (7a)
Purple liquid, 47 mg, yield: 87% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.40–7.32 (m, 4H), 7.27 (ddd, J = 7.0, 3.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (td, J = 7.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.64–6.57 (m, 2H), 4.37 (s, 2H), 3.13 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 142.7, 139.8, 130.8, 128.4, 127.2, 126.8, 123.3, 121.6, 116.7, 110.3, 48.0, 41.8. MS (EI) m/z: 274, 195, 119, 105, 91, 65, 51. Anal. calcd for C15H18N2OS: C, 65.66; H, 6.61; N, 10.21; found: C, 65.38; H, 6.70; N, 10.29.
N-[2-(4-Methoxybenzylamino)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (7b)
Purple liquid, 49 mg, yield: 80% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.30–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.09 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.92–6.88 (m, 1H), 6.88–6.85 (m, 2H), 6.62–6.58 (m, 2H), 4.28 (s, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.14 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 158.6, 142.8, 131.9, 130.7, 128.5, 123.4, 121.8, 116.8, 113.9, 110.3, 55.2, 47.5, 42.0. MS (EI) m/z: 304, 224, 209, 181, 112, 77, 63, 39. Anal. calcd for C16H20N2O2S: C, 63.13; H, 6.62; N, 9.20; found: C, 62.87; H, 6.73; N, 9.32.
N-[2-(3-Fluorobenzylamino)phenyl]-S-dimethylsulfoximine (7c)
Purple liquid, 48 mg, yield: 83% (purified by silica gel chromatography using PE/EA 5:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31–7.25 (m, 1H), 7.15–7.05 (m, 3H), 6.93 (td, J = 8.3, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (td, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (td, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (s, 2H), 3.16 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 163.0 (d, J = 244 Hz), 142.8 (d, J = 6 Hz), 142.4, 130.9, 129.9 (d, J = 8 Hz), 123.3, 122.5 (d, J = 2 Hz), 121.7, 117.1, 113.8 (d, J = 22 Hz), 113.6 (d, J = 21 Hz), 110.3, 47.5 (d, J = 1 Hz), 42.0. MS (EI) m/z: 292, 213, 119, 105, 78, 51. Anal. calcd for C15H17FN2OS: found: C, 61.62; H, 5.86; N, 9.58; found: C, 61.40; H, 5.97; N, 9.65.
Acknowledgments
The author are grateful for the financial support from the NSFC (21562002), the NSF of Jiangxi Province (20171ACB21048), and the NSF of the Jiangxi Provincial Education Department (GJJ160924). This research was also partially supported by the Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Functional Molecular Engineering of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology (2017kf04).
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03353.
Author Contributions
§ B.L. and P.L. contributed equally to this work.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- For representative reviews and recent examples, see:; a Wu X.-F.; Natte K. The applications of dimethyl sulfoxide as reagent in organic synthesis. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 336–352. 10.1002/adsc.201501007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Jones-Mensah E.; Karki M.; Magolan J. Dimethyl Sulfoxide as a Synthon in Organic Chemistry. Synthesis 2016, 48, 1421–1436. 10.1055/s-0035-1560429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Xu C.; Jiang S.-F.; Wen X.-H.; Zhang Q.; Zhou Z.-W.; Wu Y.-D.; Jia F.-C.; Wu A.-X. Dimethyl Sulfoxide Serves as a Dual Synthon: Construction of 5-Methyl Pyrimidine Derivatives via Four Component Oxidative Annulation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 2267–2271. 10.1002/adsc.201800180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Zhu X.; Li W.; Luo X.; Deng G.; Liang Y.; Liu J. A catalyst-free and additive-free method for the synthesis of benzothiazolethiones from o-iodoanilines, DMSO and potassium sulfide. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1970–1974. 10.1039/C8GC00477C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Pothikumar R.; Sujatha C.; Namitharan K. Transition-Metal-Free In Situ Generation of Terminal Alkenes: Synthesis of Multisubstituted Acrylamidines via Tandem sp3 C-H Olefination/sp2 C-H Arylation Reactions. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 7783–7787. 10.1021/acscatal.7b02819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Wakade S. B.; Tiwari D. K.; Ganesh P. S. K. P.; Phanindrudu M.; Likhar P. R.; Tiwari D. K. Transition-Metal-Free Quinoline Synthesis from Acetophenones and Anthranils via Sequential One-Carbon Homologation/Conjugate Addition/Annulation Cascade. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4948–4951. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Jadhav S. D.; Singh A. Oxidative Annulations Involving DMSO and Formamide: K2S2O8 Mediated Syntheses of Quinolines and Pyrimidines. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5673–5676. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Liang Y.-F.; Li X.; Wang X.; Zou M.; Tang C.; Liang Y.; Song S.; Jiao N. Conversion of Simple Cyclohexanones into Catechols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12271–12277. 10.1021/jacs.6b07269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For representative examples, see:; a Li J.; Zhang J.; Tan H.; Wang D. Z. Visible-Light-Promoted Vinylation of Tetrahydrofuran with Alkynes through Direct C-H Bond Functionalization. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2522–2525. 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ghosh T.; Maity P.; Ranu B. C. Cobalt-Catalyzed Remote C-4 Functionalization of 8-Aminoquinoline Amides with Ethers via C-H Activation under Visible-Light Irradiation. Access to α-Heteroarylated Ether Derivatives. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 1011–1014. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Shields B. J.; Doyle A. G. Direct C(sp3)-H Cross Coupling Enabled by Catalytic Generation of Chlorine Radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12719–12722. 10.1021/jacs.6b08397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Deng H.-P.; Fan X.-Z.; Chen Z.-H.; Xu Q.-H.; Wu J. Photoinduced Nickel-Catalyzed Chemo- and Regioselective Hydroalkylation of Internal Alkynes with Ether and Amide α-Hetero C(sp3)-H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13579–13584. 10.1021/jacs.7b08158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Jin J.; MacMillan D. W. C. Direct α-Arylation of Ethers through the Combination of Photoredox-Mediated C-H Functionalization and the Minisci Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1565–1569. 10.1002/anie.201410432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Liu D.; Liu C.; Li H.; Lei A. Direct Functionalization of Tetrahydrofuran and 1,4-Dioxane: Nickel-Catalyzed Oxidative C(sp3)-H Arylation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4453–4456. 10.1002/anie.201300459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Wan M.; Meng Z.; Lou H.; Liu L. Practical and Highly Selective C-H Functionalization of Structurally Diverse Ethers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13845–13849. 10.1002/anie.201407083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For representative reviews, see:; a Bizet V.; Hendriks C. M. M.; Bolm C. Sulfur imidations: access to sulfimides and sulfoximines. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3378–3390. 10.1039/C5CS00208G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Bizet V.; Kowalczyk R.; Bolm C. Fluorinated sulfoximines: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2426–2438. 10.1039/c3cs60427f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Reggelin M.; Zur C. Sulfoximines. Structures, properties, and synthetic applications. Synthesis 2000, 1. 10.1055/s-2000-6217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- For selective examples, see:; a Li Z.; Yu H.; Bolm C. Dibenzothiophene Sulfoximine as an NH3 Surrogate in the Synthesis of Primary Amines by Copper-Catalyzed C-X and C-H Bond Amination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9532–9535. 10.1002/anie.201705025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Moessner C.; Bolm C. Diphenylphosphanylsulfoximines as ligands in iridium-catalyzed asymmetric imine hydrogenations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7564–7567. 10.1002/anie.200502482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Rit R. K.; Yadav R.; Ghosh K.; Shankar M.; Sahoo A. K. Sulfoximine Assisted Pd(II)-Catalyzed Bromination and Chlorination of Primary β-C(sp3)-H Bond. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 5258–5261. 10.1021/ol502337b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Bolm C.; Moll G.; Kahmann J. D. Synthesis of pseudopeptides with sulfoximines as chiral backbone modifying elements. Chem. - Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1118–1128. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Parthasarathy K.; Bolm C.; et al. Hydroarylations of Heterobicyclic Alkenes through Rhodium-Catalyzed Directed C-H Functionalizations of S-Aryl Sulfoximines. Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 15732–15736. 10.1002/chem.201404859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Mancheño O. G.; Bistri O.; Bolm C. Iodinane- and Metal-Free Synthesis of N-Cyano Sulfilimines: Novel and Easy Access of NH-Sulfoximines. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3809–3811. 10.1021/ol7016577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Matos P. M.; Lewis W.; Moore J. C.; Stockman R. A. Sulfonimidates: Useful Synthetic Intermediates for Sulfoximine Synthesis via C-S Bond Formation. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3674–3677. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zenzola M.; Doran R.; Degennaro L.; Luisi R.; Bull J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7203–7207. 10.1002/anie.201602320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For representative examples, see:; a Bolm C.; Hildebrand J. P. Palladium-Catalyzed N-Arylation of Sulfoximines with Aryl Bromides and Aryl Iodides. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 169–175. 10.1021/jo991342u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sedelmeier J.; Bolm C. Efficient Copper-Catalyzed N-Arylation of Sulfoximines with Aryl Iodides and Aryl Bromides. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6904–6906. 10.1021/jo051066l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yang Q.; Choy P. Y.; Zhao Q.; Leung M. P.; Chan H. S.; So C. M.; Wong W.-T.; Kwong F. Y. Palladium-Catalyzed N-Arylation of Sulfoximines with Aryl Sulfonates. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 11369–11376. 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Moessner C.; Bolm C. Cu(OAc)2-catalyzed N-arylations of sulfoximines with aryl boronic acids. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2667–2669. 10.1021/ol050816a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Cho G. Y.; Rémy P.; Jansson J.; Moessner C.; Bolm C. Copper-Mediated Cross-Coupling Reactions of N-Unsubstituted Sulfoximines and Aryl Halides. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3293–3296. 10.1021/ol048806h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Kim J.; Ok J.; Kim S.; Choi W.; Lee P. H. Mild Copper-TBAF-Catalyzed N-Arylation of Sulfoximines with Aryl Siloxanes. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 4602–4605. 10.1021/ol502174n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Correa A.; Bolm C. Iron-catalyzed C-N cross-coupling of sulfoximines with aryl iodides. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 391–394. 10.1002/adsc.200700508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; h Vaddula B.; Leazer J.; Varma R. S. Copper-Catalyzed Ultrasound-Expedited N-Arylation of Sulfoximines using Diaryliodonium Salts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 986–990. 10.1002/adsc.201100808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; i Yongpruksa N.; Calkins N. L.; Harmata M. Efficient palladium-catalyzed N-arylation of a sulfoximine with aryl chlorides. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7665–7667. 10.1039/c1cc12444g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Parker W. B. Enzymology of Purine and Pyrimidine Antimetabolites Used in the Treatment of Cancer. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2880–2893. 10.1021/cr900028p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Garg R.; Gupta S. P.; Gao H.; Babu M. S.; Debnath A. K.; Hansch C. Comparative Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Studies on Anti-HIV Drugs. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3525–3601. 10.1021/cr9703358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For representative examples of α-C-H amination of THF, see:; a Pan Z.; Fan Z.; Lu B.; Cheng J. Halogen-Bond-Promoted α-C-H Amination of Ethers for the Synthesis of Hemiaminal Ethers. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1761–1767. 10.1002/adsc.201800006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Buslov I.; Hu X. Transition metal-free intermolecular α-C-H amination of ethers at room temperature. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3325–3330. 10.1002/adsc.201400646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Luo Z.; Jiang Z.; Jiang W.; Lin D. C-H Amination of Purine Derivatives via Radical Oxidative Coupling. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 3710–3718. 10.1021/acs.joc.8b00066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Yue Q.; Xiao Z.; Ran Z.; Yuan S.; Zhang Q.; Li D. Copper-catalyzed α-C-H amidation of simple ethers through C(sp3)-H/N-H cross dehydrogenative coupling. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 967–971. 10.1039/C7QO01003F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Wu J.; Zhou Y.; Chiang C.-W.; et al. Electro-oxidative C(sp3)-H Amination of Azoles via Intermolecular Oxidative C(sp3)-H/N-H Cross-Coupling. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8320–8323. 10.1021/acscatal.7b03551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Zhang L.; Yi H.; Wang J.; Lei A. Visible-Light Mediated Oxidative C-H/N-H Cross-Coupling between Tetrahydrofuran and Azoles Using Air. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 10704–10709. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Yang Q.; Choy P. Y.; Fu W. C.; Fan B.; Kwong F. Y. Copper-Catalyzed Oxidative C-H Amination of Tetrahydrofuran with Indole/Carbazole Derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 11193–11199. 10.1021/acs.joc.5b01990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Dian L.; Wang S.; Zhang-Negrerie D.; Du Y.; Zhao K. Organocatalytic amination of alkyl ethers via n-Bu4NI/t-BuOOH-mediated intermolecular oxidative C(sp3)-N bond formation: novel synthesis of hemiaminal ethers. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11738–11741. 10.1039/C4CC05758A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Cerecetto H.; Porcal W. Pharmacological properties of furoxans and benzofuroxans: Recent developments. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 57–71. 10.2174/1389557053402864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Jovené C.; Chugunova E. A.; Goumont R. The properties and the use of substituted benzofuroxans in pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry: a comprehensive review. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 1089–1136. 10.2174/1389557511313080001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Porcal W.; Merlino A.; Boiani M.; Gerpe A.; Goznalez M.; Cerecetto H. Arylethenylbenzofuroxan Derivatives as Drugs for Chagas Disease: Multigram Batch Synthesis using a Wittig-Boden Process. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 156–162. 10.1021/op7001722. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Gonda M.; Nieves M.; Nunes E.; Cerain A. L.; Monge A.; Lavaggi M. L.; Gonzalez M.; Cerecetto H. N′-dioxide scaffold as selective hypoxic cytotoxin pharmacophore. Structural modifications looking for further DNA topoisomerase II-inhibition activity. MedChemComm 2013, 4, 595. 10.1039/c3md00022b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Jaso A.; Zarranz B.; Aldana I.; Monge A. Synthesis of New Quinoxaline-2-carboxylate 1,4-Dioxide Derivatives as Anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2019–2025. 10.1021/jm049952w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Vicente E.; Villar R.; Burguete A.; Solano B.; Ancizu S.; Pérez-Silanes S.; Aldana I.; Monge A. Substitutions of fluorine atoms and phenoxy groups in the synthesis of quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxide derivatives. Molecules 2008, 13, 86–95. 10.3390/molecules13010086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- For selective examples, see:; a Anderson R. F.; Yadav P.; Shinde S. S.; Hong C. R.; Pullen S. M.; Reynisson J.; Wilson W. R.; Hay M. P. Radical Chemistry and Cytotoxicity of Bioreductive 3-Substituted Quinoxaline Di-N-Oxides. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2016, 29, 1310–1324. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Porcal W.; Hernandez P.; Gonzalez M.; Ferreira A.; Olea-Azar C.; Cerecetto H.; Castro A. Heteroarylnitrones as Drugs for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Synthesis, Neuroprotective Properties, and Free Radical Scavenger Properties. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 6150–6159. 10.1021/jm8006432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Haddadin M. J.; El-Khatib M.; Shoker T. A.; Beavers C. M.; Olmstead M. M.; Fettinger J. C.; Farber K. M.; Kurth M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 8421. 10.1021/jo201687x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Shoker T. A.; Ghattass K. I.; Fettinger J. C.; Kruth M. J.; Haddadin M. J. Unusual Friedlander Reactions: A Route to Novel Quinoxaline-Based Heterocycles. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3704–3707. 10.1021/ol301550e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Dooley B. M.; Bowles S. E.; Storr T.; Frank N. L. Synthesis of Neutral Spin-Delocalized Electron Acceptors for Multifunctional Materials. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4781–4783. 10.1021/ol701725r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Peng H.; Dornevil K. H.; Draganov A. B.; Chen W.; Dai D.; Nelson W. H.; Liu A.; Wang B. An unexpected copper catalyzed ‘reduction’ of an arylazide to amine through the formation of a nitrene intermediate. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 5079–5085. 10.1016/j.tet.2013.04.091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Goldberg F. W.; Kettle J. G.; Xiong J.; Lin D. General synthetic strategies towards N-alkyl sulfoximine building blocks for medicinal chemistry and the use of dimethylsulfoximine as a versatile precursor. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 6613–6622. 10.1016/j.tet.2014.06.120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kloeckner U.; Nachtsheim B. J. Mild hypervalent iodine mediated oxidative nitration of N-aryl sulfonamides. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10485–10487. 10.1039/C4CC04738A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Jiang Y.; Loh T.-P. Catalytic and direct methyl sulfonylation of alkenes and alkynes using a methyl sulfonyl radical generated from a DMSO, dioxygen and copper system. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 4939–4943. 10.1039/C4SC01901F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Gao X.; Pan X.; Gao J.; Huang H.; Yuan G.; Li Y. Ammonium iodide-induced sulfonylation of alkenes with DMSO and water toward the synthesis of vinyl methyl sulfones. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 210–212. 10.1039/C4CC07606K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yuan G.; Zheng J.; Gao X.; Li X.; Huang L.; Chen H.; Jiang H. Copper-catalyzed aerobic oxidation and cleavage/formation of C-S bond: a novel synthesis of aryl methyl sulfones from aryl halides and DMSO. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7513–7515. 10.1039/c2cc32964f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Huang M.-H.; Zhu C.-F.; He C.-L.; Zhu Y.-L.; Hao W.-J.; Wang D.-C.; Tu S.-J.; Jiang B. Visible-light-induced methylsulfonylation/bicyclization of C(sp3)-tethered 1,7-enynes using a DMSO/H2O system. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1643–1650. 10.1039/C8QO00098K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Xu N.; Zhang Y.; Chen W.; Li P.; Wang L. Photoinduced N-methylation and N-sulfonylation of azobenzenes with DMSO under mild reaction conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1199–1208. 10.1002/adsc.201701548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sebban M.; Goumont R.; Hallé J. C.; Marrot J.; Terrier F. Diels-Alder trapping of an o-dinitroso intermediate in the 1-oxide/3-oxide interconversion of a 2,1,3-benzoxadiazole derivative. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1009–1010. 10.1039/a902170a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- CCDC 1844419 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper (compound 3a). www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
- CCDC 1844418 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper (compound 5f). www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
- a Langner M.; Bolm C. C1-Symmetric sulfoximines as ligands in copper-catalyzed asymmetric Mukaiyama-type Aldol reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5984–5987. 10.1002/anie.200460953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Frings M.; Atodiresei I.; Wang Y.; Rnsink J.; Raabe G.; Bolm C. C1-Symmetric aminosulfoximines in copper-catalyzed asymmetric vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol reactions. Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 16, 4577–4587. 10.1002/chem.200903077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Langner M.; Rémy P.; Bolm C. Highly modular synthesis of C1-symmetric aminosulfoximines and their use as ligands in copper-catalyzed asymmetric Mukaiyama-aldol reactions. Chem. - Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6254–6265. 10.1002/chem.200500497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Bizet V.; Buglioni L.; Bolm C. Light-Induced Ruthenium-Catalyzed Nitrene Transfer Reactions: A Photochemical Approach towards N-Acyl Sulfimides and Sulfoximines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5639–5642. 10.1002/anie.201310790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sauer J.; Mayer K. K. Thermolyse und photolyse von 3-subtituierten Δ2-1.4.2-dioxazolinonen-(5), Δ2-1.4.2-dioxazolin-thionen-(5) und 4-substituierten Δ3-1.2.5.3-thiadioxazolin-s-oxiden. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 319–324. 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)98753-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Thu H.-Y.; Yu W.-Y.; Che C.-M. Intermolecular Amidation of Unactivated sp2 and sp3 C-H Bonds via Palladium-Catalyzed Cascade C-H Activation/Nitrene Insertion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9048–9049. 10.1021/ja062856v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Biswas A.; Karmakar U.; Nandi S.; Samanta R. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 8933–8942. 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.










