Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2007 Sep 10;21(5):282–285. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20184

Determination of leukocyte counts in cerebrospinal fluid with a disposable plastic hemocytometer

Hachiro Yamanishi 1,, Nobuko Imai 1, Etsuji Suehisa 1, Yuzuru Kanakura 1, Yoshinori Iwatani 2
PMCID: PMC6649038  PMID: 17847111

Abstract

Manual microscopic cell counting in a Fuchs‐Rosenthal (FR) chamber has been the gold standard for quantification of leukocytes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). However, for accurate determination of the number and differentiation of cells by chamber counting, hemocytometers must be prepared carefully and kept clean. Improper fitting of the chamber and coverslip changes the volume of sample introduced into the chamber well. Moreover, because conventional hemocytometers are used repeatedly and are breakable, there is a risk of exposure to potentially infectious material. To address these issues, disposable plastic hemocytometers have been developed. However, the accuracy, precision, and clinical usefulness of disposable chambers for CSF cells counting have not been determined. In the present study, we evaluated use of a disposable plastic counting chamber (C‐Chip DHC‐F01) by comparing its performance with that of an FR chamber for counting of CSF specimens and cell suspensions. Within‐run precision of C‐Chip counting was comparable or superior to that of FR chamber counting, and excellent correlation between cell counts obtained with the C‐Chip chamber and FR chamber was observed. However, C‐Chip chambers that were kept at 4°C yielded significantly low cell counts. The disposable hemocytometer will reduce the risk of exposure to potentially infectious material. However, use of C‐Chip chambers should be avoided in cold environments. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 21:282–285, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: CSF, cells counting, hemocytometer


Abbreviations
CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

FR

Fuchs‐Rosenthal

PBS

phosphate‐buffered saline; SD, standard deviation; Sy∣x, standard deviation from a regression line to the y axis direction.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Seehusen DA, Reeves MM, Fomin DA. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Am Fam Physician 2003;68:1103–1108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ziebig R, Lun A, Sinha P. Leukocyte counts in cerebrospinal fluid with the automated hematology analyzer CellDyn 3500 and the urine flow cytometer UF‐100. Clin Chem 2000;46:242–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Van Acker JT, Delanghe JR, Langlois MR, Taes YE, De Buyzere ML, Verstraete AG. Automated flow cytometric analysis of cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chem 2001;47:556–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mahieu S, Vertessen F, Van der Planken M. Evaluation of ADVIA 120 CSF assay (Bayer) vs. chamber counting of cerebrospinal fluid specimens. Clin Lab Haematol 2004;26:195–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Soogarun S, Sirimongkolsakul S, Wiwanitkit V, Siritantikorn A, Pimsane K, Srivijarn R. Leukocyte counts in cerebrospinal fluid with the automated hematology analyzer, Technicon H*3. Clin Lab 2002;48:623–629. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hoffmann JJ, Janssen WC. Automated counting of cells in cerebrospinal fluid using the CellDyn‐4000 haematology analyser. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:1168–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Strik H, Luthe H, Nagel I, Ehrlich B, Bahr M. Automated cerebrospinal fluid cytology: limitations and reasonable applications. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2005;27:167–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Aune MW, Becker JL, Brugnara C, et al. Automated flow cytometric analysis of blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid: analytic performance. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;121:690–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yamanishi H, Imai N, Ohmine T, et al. Urine flow cytometer quantification of leukocytes in samples containing a large proportion of lymphocytes. Clin Biochem 2006;39:857–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rumke CL. Imprecision of ratio‐derived differential leukocyte counts. Blood Cells 1985;11:311–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES