Abstract
Introduction: Different methods are available for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), among them the urine‐based antigen detection assay, latex agglutination test (Katex), is a recently developed one. The main drawback of the test is false‐positive reactivity in some of healthy individuals. The false positivity of the test can be removed by boiling the urine sample for 5 min before testing. In this study an attempt was made to improve Katex by removing unpleasant boiling process, which also decreases field applicability of the test.
Methods: False‐positive and true‐positive urine samples were collected from VL patients and healthy individuals. Both samples were then treated by reagents including, sodium dodecyl sulfate, trichloroacetic acid, dithiothreitol (DTT), sulphosalicylic acid and also heating at 56°C.
Results: Findings of this study showed that DTT pretreatment significantly reduced the rate of false‐positive reactivity of Katex where 73% of false‐positive urine samples changed to negative after DTT treatment. However, the DTT treatment reduced the rate of true positivity by 14%.
Conclusion: These data indicate that DTT can be used to eliminate nonspecific reactivity in the Katex. This will improve the performance of Katex and make it a more convenient and field applicable test. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 23:202–205, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords: Katex, visceral leishmaniasis, improvement, diagnosis
REFERENCES
- 1. Gramiccia M, Gradoni L. The current status of zoonotic leishmaniases and approaches to disease control. Int J Parasitol 2005;35:1169–1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Herwaldt BL. Leishmaniasis. Lancet 1999;354:1191–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. World Health Organization . The World Health Report. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
- 4. Singh S, Sivakumar R. Recent advances in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis. J Postgrad Med 2003;49:55–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chappuis F, Rijal S, Jha UK, et al. Field validity, reproducibility and feasibility of diagnostic tests for visceral leishmaniasis in rural Nepal. Trop Med Int Health 2006;11:31–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sundar S, Rai M. Laboratory diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002;9:951–958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Riera C, Fisa R, Lopez P, et al. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test (KAtex) for detection of Leishmania antigen in urine of patients with HIV‐Leishmania coinfection: Value in diagnosis and post‐treatment follow‐up. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;23:899–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sarkari B, Chance M, Hommel M. Antigenuria in visceral leishmaniasis: Detection and partial characterisation of a carbohydrate antigen. Acta Trop 2002;82:339–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Attar ZJ, Chance ML, El‐Safi S, et al. Latex agglutination test for the detection of urinary antigens in visceral leishmaniasis. Acta Trop 2001;78:11–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. El‐Safi SH, bdel‐Haleem A, Hammad A, et al. Field evaluation of latex agglutination test for detecting urinary antigens in visceral leishmaniasis in Sudan. East Mediterr Health J 2003;9:844–855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Boelaert M, El‐Safi S, Hailu A, et al. Diagnostic tests for kala‐azar: A multi‐centre study of the freeze‐dried DAT, rK39 strip test and KAtex in East Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2008;102:32–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Rijal S, Boelaert M, Regmi S, et al. Evaluation of a urinary antigen‐based latex agglutination test in the diagnosis of kala‐azar in eastern Nepal. Trop Med Int Health 2004;9:724–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Diro E, Techane Y, Tefera T, et al. Field evaluation of FD‐DAT, rK39 dipstick and KATEX (urine latex agglutination) for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in northwest Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007;101:908–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Malaei S, Mohebali M, Akhoundi B, Zarei Z. Evaluation of latex agglutination test (Katex) for the detection of urinary antigens in human visceral leishmaniasis. J Tehran Un Med Sci 2006;4:101–108. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ruchel R. Identification of certain false‐positive results in the Cand‐Tec test for candidal antigen. Mycoses 1989;32:627–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Marshall T, Williams KM. Total protein determination in urine: Elimination of a differential response between the Coomassie blue and pyrogallol red protein dye‐binding assays. Clin Chem 2000;46:392–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Spano C, La LR. Conversion to positivity of false negative latex/hepatitis associated antigen agglutination test upon treatment of sera with EDTA or trypsin. Z Immunitatsforsch Exp Klin Immunol 1972;144:396–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Larsson A, Sjöquist J. False‐positive results in latex agglutination tests caused by rheumatoid factor. Clin Chem 1988;34:767–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Oxenhandler RW, Adelstein EH, Rogers WA. Rheumatoid factor: A cause of false positive histoplasmin latex agglutination. J Clin Microbiol 1977;5:31–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]