Abstract
Nucleic acid extraction and purification from whole blood is a routine application in many laboratories. Automation of this procedure promises standardized sample treatment, a low error rate, and avoidance of contamination. The performance of the BioRobot M48 (Qiagen) and the manual QIAmp® DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen) was compared for the extraction of DNA from whole blood. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNAs were determined by spectrophotometry. Analytical sensitivity was assessed by common PCR and genotyping techniques. The quantity and quality of the generated DNAs were slightly higher using the manual extraction method. The results of downstream applications were comparable to each other. Amplification of high‐molecular‐weight PCR fragments, genotyping by restriction digest, and pyrosequencing were successful for all samples. No cross‐contamination could be detected. While automated DNA extraction requires significantly less hands‐on time, it is slightly more expensive than the manual extraction method. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 21:244–248, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords: DNA purification, quality, quantity, roboter, PCR
REFERENCES
- 1. National Genome Research Network (Nationales Genomforschungsnetz) . Home page. http://www.ngfn.de.
- 2. Moss D, Harbison SA, Saul DJ. An easily automated, closed‐tube forensic DNA extraction procedure using a thermostable proteinase. Int J Legal Med 2003;117:340–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Montpetit SA, Fitch IT, O'Donnell PT. A simple automated instrument for DNA extraction in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:555–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hersberger M, Marti‐Jaun J, Rentsch K, Hänseler E. Rapid detection of the CYP1D6*3, CYP2D6*4, and CYP2D6*6 alleles by tetra‐primer PCR and of the CYP2D6*5 allele by multiplex long PCR. Clin Chem 2000;46:1072–1077. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bachmann HS, Siffert W, Frey UH. Successful amplification of extremely GC‐rich promoter regions using a novel ‘slowdown PCR’ technique. Pharmacogenetics 2003;13:759–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Siffert W, Rosskopf D, Siffert G, et al. Association of a human G‐protein β3 subunit variant with hypertension. Nat Genet 1998;18:45–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hauner H, Meier M, Jöckel KH, Frey UH, Siffert W. Prediction of successful weight reduction under sibutramine therapy through genotyping of the G‐protein β3 subunit gene (GNB3) C825T polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics 2003;13:453–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nagy M, Otremba P, Krüger C, et al. Optimization and validation of a fully automated silica‐coated magnetic beads purification technology in forensics. Forensic Sci Int 2005;152:13–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wilfinger WW, Mackey K, Chomczynski P. Effect of pH and ionic strength on the spectrophotometric assessment of nucleic acid purity. Biotechniques 1997;22:474–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Knepp JH, Geahr MA, Forman MS, Valsamakis A. Comparison of automated and manual nucleic acid extraction methods for detection of enterovirus RNA. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:3532–3536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]