Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2007 Sep 10;21(5):255–259. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20153

Evaluation of a rapid and convenient method for determination of cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M

Jiajun Zhang 1, Junchuan Li 1,, Youshan Zhang 1, Hongyu Zhu 1, Qing Ma 1, Gang Hang 1
PMCID: PMC6649170  PMID: 17847107

Abstract

We evaluated a method for determination of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) by CLIA, and analyzed its clinical value in patients with infectious mononucleosis. Serum samples from 407 participants were measured on an automatic CLIA analyzer. At the same time the serum samples were measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). An assessment of technological quality (methodology) in diagnostic tests demonstrated that the sensitivity of CLIA was 1.0 AU/mL and the functional sensitivity was <1.6 AU/mL. The within‐ and between‐assay imprecision values for different concentrations were all under 5%. Recoveries for both methods were 96–110%. The linear regression equation between expected values and measured values was y=0.644+0.986x, and correlation coefficient was 0.9991 (P<0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that both the sensitivity and specificity of CLIA surpassed 90%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.990, which was significantly higher than that of ELISA (P<0.05). The results indicate that CLIA is an excellent method for hCMV IgM measurement, and thus may be useful for clinical diagnoses. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 21:255–259, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: CLIA, cytomegalovirus infections, methodology, diagnostic performance, receiver operating characteristic curve


Abbreviations
hCMV

human cytomegalovirus

ELISA

enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

CLIA

chemiluminescence immunoassay

RLU

relative light units

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

ROC

receiver operating characteristic

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ho M. Cytomegalovirus. Biology and infection. 2nd ed New York: Plenum Medical Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Patel R, Paya CV. Infections in solid‐organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:86–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mclntosh K, Wilfert K, Chernesky M, Plotkln S, Mattheis MJ. Summary of a workshop on new and useful techniques in rapid viral diagnosis. J Infect Dis 1980;182:793–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Stagno S, Tinker MK, Elrod C, Fucillo D, Cloud G, O'Beirne AJ. Immunoglobulin M antibodies detected by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and radioimmunoassay in the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women and newborn infants. J Clin Microbiol 1985;21:930–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kraat YJ, Stals FS, Landini MP, Bruggeman CA. Cytomegalovirus IgM antibody detection: comparison of five assays. New Microbiol 1993;16:297–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Brytting M, Xu W, Wahren B, Sundqvist VA. Cytomegalovirus DNA detection in sera from patients with active cytomegalovirus infections. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1937–1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES