Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2008 Sep 19;22(5):362–366. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20271

Evaluation of a new commercial enzyme immunoassay for the detection of IgM antibodies to West Nile virus using a ratio method to eliminate nonspecific reactivity

Ryan J Welch 1,, Brian L Anderson 2, Christine M Litwin 1,2
PMCID: PMC6649231  PMID: 18803272

Abstract

As West Nile virus (WNV) has become endemic in the United States, following the first reported cases in New York during the summer of 1999, the demand for specific serology has increased. Several IgM capture ELISA assays for the detection of WNV‐specific IgM have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for in vitro diagnostic testing, including kits from Focus Diagnostics and InBios International, Inc. The Focus Diagnostics IgM capture ELISA has a background subtraction protocol and the InBios IgM capture ELISA implements a ratio method to detect nonspecific reactivity due to rheumatoid factor, heterophile antibodies, and other interfering substances. We compared the InBios IgM capture ELISA with the Focus Diagnostics capture ELISA. Agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the InBios IgM capture ELISA were 99, 98, and 100%, respectively. Samples that originally tested positive on the Focus Diagnostics IgM capture ELISA without the subtraction protocol and were then determined negative following the subtraction protocol agreed 100% with the InBios IgM capture ELISA. We conclude that a method to eliminate background reactivity is a necessary portion of any anti‐WNV IgM assay in order to eliminate false‐positive results. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 22:362–366, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: West Nile virus, ELISA, serology, immunology

REFERENCES

  • 1. Campbell GL, Marfin AA, Lanciotti RS, Gubler DJ. West Nile virus. Lancet Infect Dis 2002;2:519–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Guharoy R, Gilroy SA, Noviasky JA, Ference J. West Nile virus infection. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004;61:1235–1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Smithburn KC, Hughes TP, Burke AW, Paul JH. A neurotropic virus isolated from the blood of a native of Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1940;20:471–492. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Nash D, Mostashari F, Fine A et al. The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1807–1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Malkinson M, Banet C, Weisman Y et al. Introduction of West Nile virus in the Middle East by migrating white storks. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8:392–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rappole JH, Derrickson SR, Hubalek Z. Migratory birds and spread of West Nile virus in the Western Hemisphere. Emerg Infect Dis 2000;6:319–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Turell MJ, Sardelis MR, O'Guinn ML, Dohm DJ. Potential vectors of West Nile virus in North America. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2002;267:241–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. CDC . 2003. Epidemic/epizootic West Nile virus in the United States: Guidelines for surveillance. Prevention and Control. p 25.
  • 9. Roehrig JT, Nash D, Maldin B et al. Persistence of virus‐reactive serum immunoglobulin m antibody in confirmed West Nile virus encephalitis cases. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:376–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hogrefe WR, Moore R, Lape‐Nixon M, Wagner M, Prince HE. Performance of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays using a West Nile virus recombinant antigen (preM/E) for detection of West Nile virus‐ and other flavivirus‐specific antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:4641–4648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Huebner J. 2004. Antibody–antigen interactions and measurements of immunologic reactions In: Pier GB, Wetzler L, editors. Immunology, infection and immunity. Washington, DC: ASM Press; p 207–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kim M, Wadke M. Comparative evaluation of two test methods (enzyme immunoassay and latex fixation) for the detection of heterophil antibodies in infectious mononucleosis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2511–2513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Levinson SS, Miller JJ. Towards a better understanding of heterophile (and the like) antibody interference with modern immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 2002;325:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Prince HE, Hogrefe WR. Performance characteristics of an in‐house assay system used to detect West Nile Virus (WNV)‐specific immunoglobulin M during the 2001 WNV season in the United States. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10:177–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fleiss JL. 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kricka LJ. Human anti‐animal antibody interferences in immunological assays. Clin Chem 1999;45:942–956. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Salonen EM, Vaheri A, Suni J, Wager O. Rheumatoid factor in acute viral infections: Interference with determination of IgM, IgG, and IgA antibodies in an enzyme immunoassay. J Infect Dis 1980;142:250–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sambol AR, Hinrichs SH, Hogrefe WR, Schweitzer BK. Performance of a commercial flavivirus (West Nile) IgM capture analyte specific reagents assay using a screening test for interfering factors (IF) during a West Nile virus epidemic season in Nebraska. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006;14:87–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES