Skip to main content
JNCI Cancer Spectrum logoLink to JNCI Cancer Spectrum
. 2018 Dec 7;2(4):pky049. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky049

Cardiovascular Care Among Cancer Survivors in the United States

Kevin A Pearlstein 1, Ramsankar Basak 1, Ronald C Chen 1,2,3,✉
PMCID: PMC6649739  PMID: 31360872

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality among cancer survivors, but whether survivors receive routine cardiovascular monitoring and preventive care has not been well studied. This study uses a population-based dataset to examine this question.

Methods

Data from the National Health Interview Survey were used to identify 13 266 cancer survivors who completed surveys from 2011 to 2015. Prevalence of CVD and associated risk factors, patterns of doctor visitation, and receipt of CVD preventive care were examined. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine factors associated with the receipt of preventive care for survivors with and without CVD risk factors.

Results

CVD risk factors were prevalent in older cancer survivors 65 years and older (56.9% with hyperlipidemia, 66.8% with hypertension) and younger survivors younger than 50 years (35.4% obese, 30.3% current smokers). Rates of blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose monitoring were high, but rates of lifestyle modification were lower (54.8% moderate exercise, 47.1% smoking cessation attempts among smokers). Although 71.5% of survivors at 2 years or less from diagnosis saw both general and specialist doctors, only 51.6% of survivors at 5 or more years saw both, and 43.5% saw only a general doctor. On multivariable analysis, receipt of CVD preventive care was strongly associated with general doctor visitation for those with and without CVD risk factors.

Conclusions

CVD and associated risk factors are prevalent among both older and younger cancer survivors across the United States. This study identifies areas for improvement related to lifestyle modification in survivors, and also highlights the importance of care transition to the primary care provider for long-term survivors.


With recent advances in cancer treatments, an increasing number of cancer patients are becoming long-term survivors. Approximately two-thirds of newly diagnosed cancer patients are now estimated to survive at least 5 years, and it is projected that by 2024 there will be nearly 19 million cancer survivors in the United States (1). National organizations have recognized that cancer survivors have unique healthcare needs (2); specifically, preventive care is described by the Institute of Medicine as an important component of healthcare for cancer survivors in their publication “From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition” (3).

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality in both the general population and among cancer survivors in the United States (4–9). National guidelines for the general population emphasize the importance of routine preventive care for CVD (10,11). Guidelines specific to cancer survivors are beginning to emerge (12), recognizing that this population may be at an even higher risk for developing CVD than the general population due to CVD that can be caused by certain types of systemic therapy and radiation therapy (12–17). Therefore, cardiovascular preventive care is equally important, and perhaps more so, among cancer survivors.

However, the receipt of cardiovascular preventive care has not been well studied among cancer survivors. We used a US population-based data source to examine the prevalence of CVD and the receipt of preventive care.

Materials and Methods

Source of Data

We used data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an annual cross-sectional survey designed by the National Center for Health Statistics, to provide data that reflects the overall health status and healthcare of the noninstitutionalized US population. A new sample of US households is interviewed each year regarding participants’ health status, sociodemographics, and healthcare utilization (18). These data are commonly used to represent healthcare patterns in the United States (19–21).

Analytic Cohort

We examined the NHIS database to identify individuals who reported a history of cancer (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancer). We identified 13 266 individuals available in NHIS survey years 2011–2015. Consistent with the definition provided by the Institute of Medicine (3) and used in previous NHIS studies (19,20), we defined the survivorship period as starting immediately upon cancer diagnosis.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine the prevalence of CVD and associated risk factors, incorporating NHIS sample weights to reflect population-based estimates, as was done in prior studies (19,20). We examined if patients saw a general doctor (defined as a doctor in general practice, family medicine, or internal medicine) and/or a specialist doctor (all other doctors) and the number of doctor visits in the past year. Further, based on the data available in NHIS, we examined specific CVD preventive care items, including rates of blood pressure, cholesterol, and fasting glucose checks. We also examined rates of lifestyle interventions that have been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality in the general population (22), including exercise in the past month and, among those who reported tobacco use, recent attempts at smoking cessation. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the factors associated with the receipt of blood pressure checks, cholesterol checks, and fasting glucose checks among cancer survivors with and without cardiovascular risk factors. Analysis was performed using SAS v. 9.4 (Cary, NC). A two-sided P value with a significance level of .05 was used.

Results

Of the 13 266 cancer survivors included in this analysis, 42.9% were younger than 65 years (Table 1). A total 83.1% survivors were diagnosed more than 2 years prior to the NHIS survey and 55.9% were more than 5 years from their cancer diagnosis. The major cancers represented in this study were breast cancer (22.6%), gynecologic cancer (15.5%), and prostate cancer (14.2%). Cardiovascular risk factors were prevalent in this population, particularly among older individuals, where 66.8% reported hypertension and 56.9% reported hyperlipidemia (Table 2). Further, 39.8% of individuals older than 65 years reported a diagnosis of CVD. Risk factors were also prevalent among younger survivors, particularly active smoking (30.3%) and obesity (35.4%).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of cancer survivors (N = 13 266)

Characteristic No. (%)
Age, y  
 <40 893 (6.7)
 40–49 1028 (7.8)
 50–64 3771 (28.4)
 65–69 1884 (14.2)
 70–84 4451 (33.6)
 ≥85 1239 (9.3)
Race
 Non-white 2210 (16.7)
 White 11 056 (83.3)
Sex
 Female 8031 (60.5)
 Male 5235 (39.5)
Education
 Non-high school graduate 2088 (15.8)
 High school graduate only 3712 (28.1)
 Some college 3851 (29.2)
 College graduate 3553 (26.9)
Region
 Midwest 3066 (23.1)
 Northeast 2264 (17.1)
 South 4669 (35.2)
 West 3267 (24.6)
Marital status
 Married 5831 (44.0)
 Not married 7412 (56.0)
Individual income  
 <$35 000 2091 (44.3)
 $35 000-$75 000 1283 (27.2)
 >$75 000 683 (14.5)
 Unknown 664 (14.1)
Health insurance  
 Yes 12 244 (97.4)
 No 326 (2.6)
Year of NHIS Survey  
 2011 12 244 (97.4)
 2012 2433 (18.3)
 2013 2597 (19.6)
 2014 2623 (19.8)
 2015 2861 (21.6)
Type of cancer*  
 Breast 3003 (22.6)
 Colorectal 1057 (8.0)
 Prostate 1887 (14.2)
 Gynecologic 2053 (15.5)
 Other 5528 (41.7)
Time from cancer diagnosis, y  
 ≤2 2154 (16.9)
 3-5 3454 (27.2)
 ≥6 7107 (55.9)
*

Sums over 100 because of multiple cancer incidences.

Table 2.

Cardiovascular disease and risk factors among cancer survivors stratified by age*

Medical condition Total <50 y 50–64 y >65 y
CVD risk factors
 Hypertension 53.2% 27.6% 48.7% 66.8%
 Cholesterol 48.4% 22.4% 44.4% 56.9%
 Diabetes 17.7% 8.0% 17.2% 22.1%
 Current smoker 14.0% 30.3% 20.1% 7.8%
 Obesity 30.4% 35.4% 35.3% 26.8%
CVD
 Any CVD 29.8% 14.5% 23.7% 39.8%
 Stroke 6.4% 3.6% 5.4% 8.9%
 MI 8.7% 2.7% 6.7% 12.2%
 Angina 5.5% 1.8% 4.6% 7.0%
 Heart condition, unspecified 17.4% 9.8% 14.1% 22.1%
*

Analysis incorporated NHIS sample weights to reflect population-based estimates of the prevalence of each studied condition. CVD = cardiovascular disease; MI = myocardial infarction.

Most cancer survivors reported general doctor visitation in the past year (86.3%), whereas fewer reported specialist doctor visitation (59.4%) (Table 3). Although most survivors (71.5%) 2 years or less from diagnosis saw both general and specialist doctors in the past year, this decreased over time and longer-term survivors were more likely to see a general doctor only (Table 4). A total 51.6% of survivors of more than 5 years saw both general and specialist doctors, and 43.5% saw only a general doctor. Nearly all survivors reported blood pressure checks (95.9%) and cholesterol checks (86.0%). Individuals with 0–1 cardiovascular risk factors had lower rates of preventive care screening than those with known CVD or more than 1 risk factor: blood pressure checks (94.1% vs 98.0%), cholesterol checks (79.9% vs 93.2%), and fasting glucose checks (53.0% vs 69.4%). Rates of lifestyle modification were more modest, with 54.8% reporting moderate exercise within the past month, and only 47.1% of current smokers reporting a recent attempt at smoking cessation.

Table 3.

Healthcare utilization and preventive care among cancer survivors*

Doctor visitation  
 General doctor visit in past year 86.3%
 Specialist doctor visit in past year 59.4%
 Number of doctor visits in past year  
 0 5.0%
 1–3 29.2%
 ≥4 65.8%
Preventive care  
 Blood pressure check in past year 95.9%
 Cholesterol check in past year 86.0%
 Fasting glucose check in past year 60.5%
 Moderate exercise in past month 54.8%
 Tried to quit smoking in past year† 47.1%
*

Analysis incorporated NHIS sample weights to reflect population-based estimates.

†

Among individuals who currently smoke (N = 2021).

Table 4.

Healthcare utilization by time from cancer diagnosis

Doctor visitation in past 12 months All ≤2 years from diagnosis 3–5 years from diagnosis >5 years from diagnosis
General doctor visit only 35.1% 21.1% 30.8% 43.5%
Specialist doctor visit only 5.9% 7.4% 6.6% 4.9%
Both general and specialist doctor visit 59.0% 71.5% 62.6% 51.6%

On multivariable analysis among cancer survivors with CVD or risk factors, receipt of cardiovascular monitoring (blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose) was most strongly associated with general doctor visitation (Table 5). Findings were similar among cancer survivors without a history of cardiovascular risk factors (Table 6).

Table 5.

Multivariable analysis of factors associated with blood pressure check, cholesterol check, and fasting glucose check in the past year among cancer survivors with cardiovascular disease or risk factors

Characteristic Blood pressure check, OR (95% CI) Cholesterol check, OR (95% CI) Fasting glucose check, OR (95% CI)
General doctor visit
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 12.90 (8.85 to 18.79)* 4.41 (3.44 to 5.66)* 2.66 (2.19 to 3.23)*
Specialist doctor visit
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 2.43 (1.61 to 3.65)* 1.63 (1.34 to 1.98)* 1.33 (1.19 to 1.49)*
Age at survey (5 year increments) 1.05 (0.97 to 1.14) 1.15 (1.10 to 1.20)* 1.01 (0.98 to 1.04)
Race
 White REF REF REF
 Non-white 0.94 (0.53 to 1.65) 1.13 (0.84 to 1.50) 1.19 (1.01 to 1.39)*
Sex
 Female REF REF REF
 Male 0.84 (0.55 to 1.29) 1.30 (1.05 to 1.62)* 1.21 (1.07 to 1.38)*
Education
 College graduate REF REF REF
 < High school 0.79 (0.46 to 1.36) 0.88 (0.65 to 1.20) 0.85 (0.71 to 1.01)
 High school 1.25 (0.78 to 2.02) 0.95 (0.72 to 1.26) 0.88 (0.75 to 1.03)
 Some college 0.88 (0.53 to 1.47) 0.92 (0.69 to 1.23) 1.08 (0.92 to 1.26)
Region
West REF REF REF
 Northeast 1.21 (0.66 to 2.22) 1.36 (0.95 to 1.97) 1.17 (0.95 to 1.44)
 Midwest 1.34 (0.71 to 2.53) 1.06 (0.79 to 1.42) 1.15 (0.97 to 1.35)
 South 1.19 (0.72 to 1.96) 1.23 (0.94 to 1.60) 0.99 (0.85 to 1.15)
Married
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 1.19 (0.79 to 1.77) 1.48 (1.20 to 1.84)* 1.15 (1.02 to 1.28)*
Health insurance
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 2.68 (1.26 to 5.71)* 2.19 (1.36 to 3.54)* 1.24 (0.84 to 1.83)
*

P < .05 compared to reference category (REF). OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

Table 6.

Multivariable analysis of factors associated with blood pressure check, cholesterol check, and fasting glucose check in past year in cancer survivors without cardiovascular disease or risk factors

Characteristic Blood pressure Check, OR (95% CI) Cholesterol check, OR (95% CI) Fasting glucose check, OR (95% CI)
General doctor visit
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 15.08 (8.11 to 28.04)* 4.29 (3.01 to 6.12)* 3.03 (2.07 to 4.44)*
Specialist doctor visit
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 6.08 (3.04 to 12.14)* 1.49 (1.05 to 2.12)* 1.13 (0.85 to 1.49)
Age at survey (5 year increments)  0.95 (0.86 to 1.05) 1.16 (1.09 to 1.24)* 1.10 (1.05 to 1.16)*
Race
 White REF REF REF
 Non-white 0.84 (0.37 to 1.92) 1.66 (1.01 to 2.74)* 1.15 (0.76 to 1.72)
Sex
 Female REF REF REF
 Male 0.60 (0.33 to 1.10) 0.75 (0.53 to 1.06) 0.83 (0.63 to 1.09)
Education
 College graduate REF REF REF
 < High school 0.39 (0.15 to 1.04) 0.65 (0.36 to 1.16) 0.81 (0.47 to 1.39)
 High school 0.33 (0.15 to 0.72)* 0.62 (0.39 to 0.99)* 0.60 (0.41 to 0.87)*
 Some college 0.50 (0.22 to 1.11) 0.67 (0.44 to 1.02) 0.80 (0.57 to 1.11)
Region
 West REF REF REF
 Northeast 0.94 (0.37 to 2.43) 0.80 (0.46 to 1.37) 0.78 (0.51 to 1.21)
 Midwest 0.85 (0.38 to 1.90) 0.60 (0.36 to 0.98)* 0.82 (0.56 to 1.19)
 South 0.81 (0.39 to 1.67) 0.70 (0.47 to 1.06) 0.66 (0.45 to 0.97)*
Married
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 1.52 (0.87 to 2.66) 1.34 (0.92 to 1.97) 1.35 (1.03 to 1.76)*
Health insurance
 No REF REF REF
 Yes 2.07 (0.78 to 5.48) 1.62 (0.71 to 3.67) 1.84 (0.94 to 3.59)
*

P < .05 compared to reference category (REF). OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

Discussion

The importance of preventive care among cancer survivors has been emphasized by numerous groups, including the Institute of Medicine and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2,3). Indeed, this study shows that CVD and risk factors are highly prevalent in cancer survivors across the United States in both younger and older survivor age groups. General doctor visitation was frequent and was strongly associated with the receipt of cardiovascular preventive monitoring, including blood pressure, cholesterol, and fasting glucose checks. Further, general doctor visitation remained stable in longer-term cancer survivors, while specialist doctor visitation decreased. The rate of exercise and smoking cessation attempts were relatively low.

CVD has been identified as a leading cause of mortality among survivors of breast cancer (4–6), prostate cancer (8), and other cancers (7). In addition to a baseline risk for CVD as experienced by the general, noncancer population, some cancer patients may have an even greater risk due to certain oncologic treatments such as anthracycline chemotherapy (23), androgen deprivation therapy (24), and thoracic radiotherapy (14). Preventive care for CVD has been shown to reduce mortality in the general population and is incorporated in national guidelines. For example, routine screening for hypertension has been designated as a Grade A recommendation by the US Preventive Services Task Force (10), and screening and treatment of high cholesterol as well as discussion of lifestyle modifications for overweight individuals with cardiovascular risk factors have been designated as Grade B recommendations (11,25). Among patients who have diagnosed hypertension or hyperlipidemia, medical interventions are effective and have been shown to reduce mortality, highlighting the importance of screening for these cardiovascular risk factors (26,27). Tobacco cessation has been associated with decreased mortality by up to 35% in certain populations (22). Exercise has also been found to reduce mortality in the general population by 20–30% (22,28). Taken together, these data highlight the importance of the preventive care items examined in this study.

Our finding that general doctor visitation was more common than specialist doctor visitation, particularly among long-term cancer survivors, and was strongly associated with preventive care warrants further discussion. These findings suggest an initial “shared care” of cancer survivors between the oncology specialist and primary care providers in the early years of survivorship, with gradual transition to primary care only over time. However, we were not able to distinguish oncologists from other specialists in the NHIS dataset. During this transition period, close communication and coordination among care providers is important to outline individual roles in the care of cancer survivors (29). As our results show, cancer survivors who do not see a primary care provider are much less likely to receive preventive care related to cardiovascular issues. This exemplifies a group of survivors that the Institution of Medicine described as “lost in transition” (3).

Our findings complement those from prior studies that used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database, but the current study is unique in focusing on issues specific to cardiovascular preventive care. In prior studies using claims data, contact with primary care physicians was associated with receipt of general preventive services including influenza vaccination, bone density screening, and cancer screening (30–33). However, many items analyzed in the current study (blood pressure check, moderate exercise, attempt at smoking cessation) are not available in claims data. Together, the findings from prior studies and ours highlight the central role of primary care providers in the overall health of cancer survivors, and the importance of their involvement in the long-term care of cancer survivors.

Strengths of this study include the use a population-based dataset designed to reflect the health status and healthcare of the US population. Thus, the results of this study can be used to inform policy makers about the current state of survivorship care in the United States. Moreover, NHIS includes data for individuals both older and younger than 65 years; the latter is not included in other commonly used data such as Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare. Additionally, NHIS is unique in providing many preventive care items specific to CVD that are not available in many other population-based datasets. A limitation of NHIS is that it is composed of patient-reported data and is subject to nonresponse bias as well as potential misclassification of medical conditions and receipt of medical services. Despite this, data from NHIS are specifically recommended as a data source for monitoring the healthcare of the US population in the framework set forth by Healthy People 2020 (34) and have been used to evaluate issues such as cancer screening (35), smoking cessation (36), and other high-risk health behaviors (19). Additionally, although certain cancer treatments can increase the risk of CVD, this information is not available and therefore could not be incorporated in our analysis. The cross-sectional nature of NHIS does not allow for the evaluation of preventive care for preexisting cardiovascular issues separate from new cardiovascular issues after cancer treatment. Lastly, although we conclude that there is room for improvement for cancer survivors, a direct comparison was not made with noncancer individuals. who may have better or worse care than our study population.

In summary, CVD and its risk factors are highly prevalent among cancer survivors. Cardiovascular risk factors are not limited to the elderly and are present in many younger survivors. Our finding of a strong association between primary care visitation and improved cardiovascular preventive care highlights the importance of the transition of care during cancer survivorship back to the primary care provider. We also found opportunities to improve lifestyle interventions including exercise and smoking cessation in cancer survivors.

Notes

Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiation Oncology (KAP, RB, RCC) and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (RCC) and Sheps Center for Health Services Research (RCC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

None of the authors report a conflict of interest. There was no external funding.

References

  • 1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):252–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. McCabe MS, Bhatia S, Oeffinger KC, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology statement: achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):631–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E.. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survival: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Patnaik JL, Byers T, DiGuiseppi C, Dabelea D, Denberg TD.. Cardiovascular disease competes with breast cancer as the leading cause of death for older females diagnosed with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(3):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Patnaik JL, Byers T, DiGuiseppi C, Denberg TD, Dabelea D.. The influence of comorbidities on overall survival among older women diagnosed with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(14):1101–1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schairer C, Mink PJ, Carroll L, Devesa SS.. Probabilities of death from breast cancer and other causes among female breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(17):1311–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lughezzani G, Sun M, Shariat SF, et al. A population-based competing-risks analysis of the survival of patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(1):103–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shikanov S, Kocherginsky M, Shalhav AL, Eggener SE.. Cause-specific mortality following radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012;15(1):106–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hoyert D, Xu J.. Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61(6). www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htm. Accessed April 11, 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(10):778–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1997–2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):611–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Smith MR.. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4448–4456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):987–998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Meinardi MT, Gietema JA, van Veldhuisen DJ, van der Graaf WTA, de Vries EGE, Sleijfer DT.. Long-term chemotherapy-related cardiovascular morbidity. Cancer Treat Rev. 2000;26(6):429–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Adams MJ, Hardenbergh PH, Constine LS, Lipshultz SE.. Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;45(1):55–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Armenian SH, Xu LF, Ky B, et al. Cardiovascular disease among survivors of adult-onset cancer: a community-based retrospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1122.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Botman S, Moore T, Moriarity C, Parsons V.. Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2000;2(130):1–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bellizzi KM, Rowland JH, Jeffery DD, McNeel T.. Health behaviors of cancer survivors: examining opportunities for cancer control intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8884–8893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sabatino SA, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Pollack LA, Alley LG, Zauderer LJ.. Provider Counseling about health behaviors among cancer survivors in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(15):2100–2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Smith RA, Andrews K, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: a review of current American Cancer Society Guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):95–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Iestra JA, Kromhout D, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE, Boshuizen HC, van Staveren WA.. Effect size estimates of lifestyle and dietary changes on all-cause mortality in coronary artery disease patients—a systematic review. Circulation. 2005;112(6):924–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Khouri MG, Douglas PS, Mackey JR, et al. Cancer therapy-induced cardiac toxicity in early breast cancer: addressing the unresolved issues. Circulation. 2012;126(23):2749–2763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Freedland SJ, Smith MR.. Does comorbidity influence the risk of myocardial infarction or diabetes during androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer? Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):159–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Preventive Services Task Force US. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(8):587–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. LaRosa JC, He J, Vupputuri S.. Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1999;282(24):2340–2346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Freemantle N, Cleland J, Young P, Mason J, Harrison J.. beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ. 1999;318(7200):1730–1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Blair SN, Kohl HW, Barlow CE, Paffenbarger RS, Gibbons LW, Macera CA.. Changes in physical-fitness and all-cause mortality- a prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. JAMA. 1995;273(14):1093–1098. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Klabunde CN, Han PKJ, Earle CC, et al. Physician roles in the cancer-related follow-up care of cancer survivors. Fam Med. 2013;45(7):463–474. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Snyder CF, Frick KD, Herbert RJ, et al. Preventive care in prostate cancer patients: following diagnosis and for five-year survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(3):283–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Snyder CF, Earle CC, Herbert RJ, Neville BA, Blackford AL, Frick KD.. Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1073–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Snyder CF, Frick KD, Kantsiper ME, et al. Preventive care for breast cancer survivors versus controls: changes between 1998 and 2002. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15_suppl):6501. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Snyder CF, Frick KD, Herbert RJ, et al. Comorbid condition care quality in cancer survivors: role of primary care and specialty providers and care coordination. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(4):641–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020 Washington, DC. www.healthypeople.gov. Accessed February 20, 2018.
  • 35. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC.. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States—results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003;97(6):1528–1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ramaswamy AT, Toll BA, Chagpar AB, Judson BL.. Smoking, cessation, and cessation counseling in patients with cancer: a population-based analysis. Cancer. 2016;122(8):1247–1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JNCI Cancer Spectrum are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES