Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2011 Nov 14;34(12):768–773. doi: 10.1002/clc.20973

Risk Factors of Cardiac Troponin T Elevation in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease After Elective Coronary Drug‐Eluting Stent Implantation

Zhang‐Wei Chen 1, Ju‐Ying Qian 1, Jian‐Ying Ma 1, Lei Ge 1, Jun‐Bo Ge 1,
PMCID: PMC6652352  PMID: 22083940

Abstract

Background:

Cardiac troponin T elevation after coronary intervention has been demonstrated to be associated with the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there were few studies about comprehensive risk factors analysis of troponin T elevation after elective drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation.

Hypothesis:

The prognosis of CAD after coronary interventions was associated with clinical and procedural risk factors of CAD, such as age, hypertension, severity extent of CAD and so on.

Methods:

From March to December in 2010, patients with stable CAD were admitted for elective coronary intervention in our hospital. They were divided into an elevated troponin T group and a normal troponin T group by postprocedural troponin T. Clinical factors, laboratory‐test factors, and angiographic factors (such as gender, age, cholesterol, Gensini score, and others) were analyzed.

Results:

A total of 209 patients with an average age of 64.0 ± 9.9 years were enrolled in the study: 70 patients with elevated troponin T (≥0.03 ng/mL) after DES implantation and 139 patients with normal troponin T (<0.03 ng/mL). After univariate analysis, we found that age, hypertension, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐C), Gensini score, number of stenosed vessels, and total implanted stents were associated with postprocedural troponin T elevation. According to the results of multivariate analysis, we found that age, total cholesterol, number of stenosed vessels, and number of implanted stents were independent risk factors of postprocedural troponin T elevation.

Conclusions:

Age, serum total cholesterol, number of stenosed vessels, and number of implanted stents could be independent risk factors of troponin T elevation after elective DES implantation. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Z. Chen and J. Qian contributed equally to the article.

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30671998 and 30901383).

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Introduction

Cardiac troponin T, which is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for myocardial injury,1 has been demonstrated to be associated with the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Several reports have shown that an increase in cardiac troponin T can be found in a proportion of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ranging from less than 10% to almost 50%.2, 3 It has also been reported that elevation of troponin T is relatively common among patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing PCI and is an independent prognostic indicator of ischemic complications.4, 5 However, there were few studies about comprehensive risk factor analysis of troponin T elevation in patients with stable CAD after drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation. Therefore, we designed this clinical study to comprehensively elaborate the risk factors of troponin T elevation after DES implantation in patients with stable CAD, including clinical factors, laboratory‐test factors, and angiographic factors.

Methods

Study Population and Measurements

From March to December in 2010, a total of 209 patients referred to our hospital with stable angina pectoris for elective coronary intervention were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients 18 to 85 years old; (2) providing a complete clinical history; (3) underwent DES implantation; and (4) normal preprocedural troponin T (below the 10% coefficient of variation [CV] value, <0.03 ng/mL)6 and creatine kinase (CK)–muscle and brain subunits (MB) (<23 U/L). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) acute coronary syndrome; (2) elevated cardiac troponin T (≥0.03 ng/mL) and CK‐MB (≥23 U/L) before coronary intervention; (3) heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart diseases, and heart valve diseases; (4) treated coronary lesion was chronic total occlusion; (5) recent surgery or trauma; (6) active chronic inflammation; (7) dysfunction of hematological and immunological system; or (8) carcinoma or a condition treated with immunosuppressive agents. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Measurements and Population Grouping

The clinical characteristics of all patients including gender, age, smoking history, primary hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were recorded before coronary angiography. Fasting blood samples before and after angiography were drawn to detect blood biochemistry and complete blood‐cell counts. Cardiac troponin T was measured before and within 24 hours (from 10 to 20 hours) after coronary intervention. Serum level of troponin T was analyzed by immunoturbidimetry (Hitachi 7600‐020 automatic biochemistry analyzer). The upper limit of normal for the assay is <0.03 ng/mL.

Patients with postprocedural troponin T ≥0.03 ng/mL were defined as elevated troponin T group (n = 70) and others were defined as normal troponin T group (n = 139).

Coronary Angiography and Intervention

Coronary angiography was performed in all patients after admission. The patient was considered as having CAD once obstructive lesion of ≥50% reduction of lumen diameter existed in at least 1 of the coronary arteries. The severity of coronary artery disease was evaluated by:

  • 1.

    Number of stenosed vessels: represented as the number of major stenosis in epicardial arteries with at least 1 obstructive lesion (≥50% reduction of lumen diameter), including left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and left main artery (LM).

  • 2.

    Gensini score7 for graded narrowing of the lumen: 1 for 1% to 25%, 2 for 26% to 50%, 4 for 51% to 75%, 8 for 76% to 90%, 16 for 91% to 99%, and 32 for total occlusion. This score is multiplied by a factor accounting for the importance of the lesion position in the coronary arterial tree; eg, 5 for LM, 2.5 for proximal LAD, and 1 for proximal RCA. The severity of disease was expressed as the sum of the scores for individual lesions.

Gensini score, number of stenosed vessels, treated vessels, and implanted stents of each enrolled patient were recorded by observers who were blinded to the results of laboratory tests and grouping. In addition, lesion characteristics, such as diffuse lesion, bifurcation lesion and calcified lesion, were also recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as the percentage or mean ± standard deviation (SD). Chi‐square analysis was used to compare the frequency for categorical variables, and Student t analysis was used to compare the mean for continuous variables. Correlation analysis (Spearman test) was performed to evaluate the correlations between serum level of postprocedural troponin T and risk factors. Multivariable analysis (logistic) was performed to identify independent risk factors of elevated post‐procedural troponin T. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). All P values were 2‐sided, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic Data of Patients

A total of 209 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 148 males with an average age of 62.4 ± 9.9 years and 61 females with an average of 68.1 ± 9.0 years. Their clinical characteristics and biochemical profiles were presented in Table 1. Compared with patients in normal troponin T group (n = 139), patients with elevated postprocedural troponin T (n = 70) had higher average age (68.1 vs 62.0 years; P < 0.01) and higher prevalence of hypertension (81.4% vs 61.9%; P < 0.01). In addition, plasma levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐C) were higher in patients with elevated troponin T than those with normal troponin T.

Table 1.

Comparison of Demographic Data Between Patients with and Without Troponin T Elevation After Elective PCI

Elevated Troponin T Group (n = 70) Normal Troponin T Group (n = 139) P
Clinical factors
 Male (%) 47 (67.1%) 101 (72.3%) 0.251
 Age (y) 68.1 ± 9.2 62.0 ± 9.7 <0.01.
 Hypertension (%) 57 (81.4%) 86 (61.9%) <0.01
 Hyperlipidemia (%) 44 (62.9%) 70 (50.4%) 0.058
 Diabetes (%) 20 (28.6%) 27 (19.4%) 0.095
 Smoking (%) 24 (34.3%) 67 (48.2%) 0.055
Laboratory‐test factors
 Serum creatinine (µmol/L) 76.7 ± 18.7 75.4 ± 16.2 0.604
 Serum uric acid (mmol/L) 362.0 ± 84.3 348.6 ± 76.2 0.247
 Fibrinogen (g/L) 290.0 ± 56.7 275.0 ± 67.3 0.110
 Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.41 ± 1.34 3.95 ± 0.88 <0.01
 Triglyceride (mmol/L) 2.07 ± 1.80 1.73 ± 0.93 0.079
 LDL‐C (mmol/L) 2.44 ± 1.03 2.13 ± 0.74 0.028
 HDL‐C (mmol/L) 1.11 ± 0.34 1.05 ± 0.26 0.190
 Lipoprotein‐a (mmol/L) 230.7 ± 209.6 181.1 ± 181.2 0.078
 Preprocedural CK‐MB (U/L) 13.6 ± 4.7 11.5 ± 5.2 0.566
 Postprocedural CK‐MB (U/L) 17.4 ± 7.2 12.5 ± 4.8 0.013
 Preprocedural cTnT (ng/mL) <0.03 ng/ml <0.03 ng/ml 0.903
 Postprocedural cTnT (ng/mL) 0.151 ± 0.357 0.013 ± 0.019 <0.01
Angiographic factors
 Gensini score 37.9 ± 20.7 26.1 ± 15.7 <0.01
 Number of stenosed vessels 2.3 ± 0.8 1.6 ± 0.7 <0.01
 Number of treated vessels 1.3 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.2 <0.01
 Number of stent implantation 1.8 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.5 <0.01

Abbreviations: CK‐MB, creatine kinase‐MB; cTnT, cardiac troponin T; HDL‐C, high density lipoprotein‐cholesterol; LDL‐C, low density lipoprotein‐cholesterol; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Bold indicates P is less than 0.05.

Regarding the angiographic and interventional factors, we analyzed the difference concerning Gensini score, number of stenosed vessels, treated vessels, and implanted stents between the patients with and without elevated troponin T, as shown in Table 1. We found that patients with elevated postprocedural troponin T had more severe CAD and underwent more stents implantation.

Association Between Postprocedural Troponin T and Risk Factors

In order to identify the correlation between serum level of postprocedural troponin T and risk factors (including age, total cholesterol, LDL‐C, and Gensini score), the correlation analysis (Spearman test) was performed. It was shown that there were significantly positive correlations between postprocedural troponin T and age (r = 0.336; P < 0.01) and Gensini score (r = 0.368; P < 0.01), shown in Figure 1. However, there were no significant correlations between troponin T and cholesterol.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlations between postprocedural troponin T level and (A) age and (B) Gensini score.

The patients were further classified into 4 subgroups by serum level of postprocedural troponin T: group A, ≥0.09 ng/mL (triple upper limit of normal troponin T); group B, 0.03 ∼ 0.09 ng/mL (lower than triple upper limit and higher than normal upper limit); group C, 0.01 to 0.03 ng/mL; and group D, <0.01 ng/mL. We found that there was a significantly higher Gensini score in patients with higher postprocedural troponin T, as shown in Figure 2A. In addition, the number of stenosed vessels was 2.1, 2.3, 1.7, and 1.4 in these 4 groups, respectively. Numbers of treated vessels (1.4 vs 1.3 vs 1.0 vs 1.0) and implanted stents (2.0 vs 1.7 vs 1.4 vs 1.2) in patients with higher troponin T were higher than those with lower level, as shown in Figure 2B.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The difference of (A) Gensini score and (B) number of stenosed vessels, treated vessels, and implanted stents in 4 different groups classified by postprocedural troponin T (Group A, ≥0.09 ng/mL; group B, 0.03 ∼ 0.09 ng/mL; group C, 0.01 ∼ 0.03 ng/mL; and group D, <0.01 ng/mL).

Association Between Postprocedural Troponin T and Angiographic Characteristics

Characteristics of angiographic lesion, including diffuse lesion, thrombus present, bifurcation lesion, and calcified lesion, were recorded in our study. According to the results of chi‐square analysis, we found there was higher prevalence of diffuse lesion (55.7% vs 28.8%; P < 0.01) and bifurcation lesion (20% vs 9.4%; P = 0.028) in patients with elevated postprocedural troponin T than those with normal level, shown in Figure 3. There was no significant difference of prevalence of thrombus present and calcified lesion between 2 groups.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The difference of the prevalence of (A) diffuse lesions, (B) bifurcation lesions, (C) calcified lesions, and (D) thrombus present between patients with or without postprocedural troponin T elevation after PCI. Abbreviation: PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis for Elevated Postprocedural Troponin T

Logistic analysis was used to evaluate the association between postprocedural troponin T and risk factors. In this analysis, postprocedural troponin T elevation was employed as a dependent variable, while age, hypertension, total cholesterol, LDL‐C, Gensini score, number of stenosed vessels, and total stents implanted were set as independent variables (Table 2). After adjustment by other associated factors, the risk of postprocedural troponin T elevation was increased 177% and 105% by number of implanted stents and stenosed vessels, respectively. Age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.050; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.010–1.091; P = 0.014) and higher total cholesterol (OR = 2.979; 95% CI, 1.230–7.212; P = 0.016) also increased the risk of postprocedural troponin T elevation.

Table 2.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis for Troponin T Elevation in Patients With Stable CAD After Elective PCI

r 95% Confidence Intervals P
Age 1.050 1.0101.091 0.014
Hypertension 2.264 0.984–5.210 0.055
Total cholesterol 2.979 1.2307.212 0.016
LDL‐C 0.446 0.165–1.206 0.112
Gensini score 1.014 0.989–1.039 0.268
Number of stenosed vessels 2.059 1.1913.557 0.010
Number of stents implantation 2.778 1.4955.161 0.001

Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; LDL‐C, low density lipoprotein‐cholesterol; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Bold indicates P is less than 0.05.

Discussion

Cardiac troponin T is highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for myocardial injury.1 In the setting of unstable angina or non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), their elevation is associated with more complex coronary artery stenosis, visible thrombus, plaque rupture, and multivessel CAD.8, 9 Moreover, in the setting of acute coronary syndrome, patients with baseline elevations of troponin T have a higher risk of death or recurrent MI early after presentation,10, 11 after PCI12 and during long‐term follow up.13 It has also been demonstrated that elevation of troponin T is relatively common among patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI and is an independent prognostic indicator of ischemic complications.4, 5 Prasad et al found that an isolated minor elevation in troponin T after PCI without a rise in CK‐MB following PCI provided long‐term prognostic information regarding mortality and MI.6

Several reports have shown that an increase in cardiac troponin T can be found in a proportion of patients after PCI ranging from less than 10% to almost 50%.2, 3 The proportion of elevation of troponin T after PCI in our study was 33.5% (70/209). This supports that cardiac troponin T elevation was quite common after PCI in patients with stable CAD. The mechanisms responsible for cardiac enzyme release after PCI were related to myocardial ischemic injury or necrosis, caused by occlusion due to embolization,14, 15 side branch occlusion due to plaque shifting,16, 17 coronary dissection,18 coronary spasm,16 hypotension requiring administration of vasopressors,19 and prolonged ischemia due to balloon inflations.20

There were few studies comprehensively elaborating the risk factors of troponin T elevation after PCI in patients with stable CAD. Prasad et al6 found that patients with elevated postprocedural troponin T underwent more multivessel coronary intervention and had more complicated procedural outcomes, such as coronary artery dissection and branch vessel occlusion. Furthermore, patients with a rise in troponin T were older, more likely to have moderate to severe angina, a history of congestive heart failure, an ejection fraction <40%, and peripheral vascular disease In our study, we analyzed the risk factors of postprocedural troponin T elevation from 3 aspects, including clinical factors (age, gender, history of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking), laboratory‐test factors (serum cholesterol, triglyceride, uric acid, and fibrinogen), and angiographic factors (angiographic characteristics, Gensini score, number of stenosed vessels, and number of implanted stents). According to the univariate and multivariate analysis, we found that age, serum total cholesterol, number of stenosed vessels, and number of stents implanted were independent risk factors of troponin T elevation after elective DES implantation.

The relationship between postprocedural cardiac marker elevation and adverse long‐term outcome was very intriguing. One possible explanation was that regional myocardial damages occurred or local scar formed in patients with elevated troponin T.21 Myocardial injury could impair left ventricular function and predispose to arrhythmic events, which influenced the survival and clinical outcomes. Alternatively, postprocedural troponin T elevation per se could be a biomarker of severe coronary artery disease, vulnerable coronary plaques,22 or complicated coronary procedure. Our study supported the latter opinion. Older age, higher cholesterol, and higher Gensini score in patients with elevated troponin T implied more severe CAD. The atherosclerotic plaque burden in these patients might be greater than that of younger patients and patients with lower cholesterol levels. Therefore, the incidence of troponin T elevation could be higher after coronary angioplasty and stent implantation. Of course, multivessel stenosed and multistent implantation could also result in more atherosclerotic debris dropping, which impaired or occluded coronary microcirculation. Interestingly, Gensini score was not an independent predictive factor for postprocedural elevated troponin T (OR = 1.014; P = 0.268) after multivariate analysis, although we found a significant difference in Gensini score between 2 groups of patients after univariate analysis. After further analysis, we found that if the factor “number of stenosed vessels” was excluded from the independent variables, the OR of the Gensini score will reach statistical difference (OR = 1.032; 95% CI, 1.032–1.055; P = 0.003). We speculate that there might be an overlapping or similar effect between Gensini score and number of stenosed vessels on troponin T, which influenced the statistical result of the Gensini score. In addition, the small sample size of this study might be another reason.

This study had several limitations: (1) small number of patients included; (2) lack of postprocedural echocardiography data for each patient; (3) classical biomarkers of inflammation, such as C‐reactive protein (CRP), were not routinely detected; and (4) angiographic characteristics were not further measured by intracoronary ultrasound. These limitations will be taken into account in our further clinical research and prospective studies.

Conclusion

Cardiac troponin T elevation in patients with stable CAD after elective PCI was associated with age, hypertension, cholesterol, Gensini score, diffuse lesion, bifurcation lesion, number of stenosed vessels, and number of implanted stents. This implies that troponin T elevation was linked to the severity of CAD. Age, serum total cholesterol, number of stenosed vessels, and number of implanted stents could be independent risk factors of troponin T elevation in patients with stable CAD after elective DES implantation.

References

  • 1. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:959–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Karim MA, Shinn M, Oskarsson H, et al. Significance of cardiac troponin T release after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:521–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Abbas SA, Glazier JJ, Wu AH, et al. Factors associated with the release of cardiac troponin T following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clin Cardiol. 1996;19:782–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kizer JR, Muttrej MR, Matthai WH, et al. Role of cardiac troponin T in the long‐term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1314–1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jeremias A, Kleiman NS, Nassif D, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of preprocedural cardiac troponin elevation among patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the evaluation of drug eluting stents and ischemic events registry. Circulation. 2008;118:632–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Prasad A, Singh M, Lerman A, et al. Isolated elevation in troponin T after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with higher long‐term mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1765–1770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lindahl B, Diderholm E, Lagerqvist B, et al. Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: a FRISC II substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38: 979–986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Heeschen C, van Den Brand MJ, Hamm CW, et al. Angiographic findings in patients with refractory unstable angina according to troponin T status. Circulation. 1999;100:1509–1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Cardiac‐specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1342–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Heidenreich PA, Alloggiamento T, Melsop K, et al. The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non‐ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta‐analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38: 478–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, et al. Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR‐REACT 2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295:1531–1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. de Filippi CR, Tocchi M, Parmar RJ, et al. Cardiac troponin T in chest pain unit patients without ischemic electrocardiographic changes: angiographic correlates and long‐term clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1827–1834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Abdelmeguid AE, Ellis SG, Sapp SK, et al. Defining the appropriate threshold of creatine kinase elevation after percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J. 1996;131:1097–1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation. 2000;101:570–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Klein LW, Kramer BL, Howard E, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of transient creatine kinase elevations and the diagnosis of non‐Q wave myocardial infarction associated with coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:621–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Abdelmeguid AE, Whitlow PL, Sapp SK, et al. Long‐term outcome of transient, uncomplicated in‐laboratory coronary artery closure. Circulation. 1995;91:2733–2741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kugelmass AD, Cohen CJ, Moscucci M, et al. Elevation of creatine kinase myocardial isoform following otherwise successful directional coronary atherectomy and stenting. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:748–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Abdelmeguid AE, Topol EJ, Whitlow PL, et al. Significance of mild transient release of creatine kinase‐MB fraction after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation. 1996;94:1528–1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Heyndrickx GR, Amano J, Kenna T, et al. Creatine kinase release not associated with myocardial necrosis after short periods of coronary artery occlusion in conscious baboons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:1299–1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Selvanayagam JB, Porto I, Channon K, et al. Troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention directly represents the extent of irreversible myocardial injury: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2005;111:1027–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz GS, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque burden and CK‐MB enzyme elevation after coronary interventions: intravascular ultrasound study of 2256 patients. Circulation. 2000;101:604–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES