Abstract
Background
Evaluation of chest pain accounts for millions of costly Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospital admissions annually. Of these, approximately 10–20% are myocardial infarctions (MI).
Hypothesis
Patients with chest pain whose initial electrocardiogram (ECG) is normal do not require hospital admission for evaluation and management of a possible myocardial infarction.
Methods
The medical records of a consecutive cohort of 250 patients who presented to the ED with chest pain and were admitted by the ED physician to a cardiology inpatient service of an academic tertiary care medical center were reviewed. Reasons for admission to hospital was to rule out an acute coronary syndrome, specifically, myocardial infarction. The initial ECG of each patient was evaluated for abnormalities and compared with the final diagnosis.
Results
Of the 75 patients presenting with normal ECGs (normal, upright T waves and isoelectric ST segments), 1 (1.3%) was subsequently diagnosed with a myocardial infarction by Troponin I elevation alone. Of the 55 patients presenting with abnormal ECGs but no clear evidence of ischemia [i.e., left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), left anterior hemiblock (LAH)], 2 (3.6%) were diagnosed with MI. Of the 48 patients presenting with abnormal ECGs questionable for ischemia (nonspecific ST and T wave changes that were not clearly ST segment elevation or depression), 7 (14.6%) were diagnosed with an MI. Of the 72 patients who presented with abnormal ECGs showing ischemia (acute ST segment elevation and/or depression), 39 (54.2%) were shown to have evidence for MI.
Summary
Patients who presented with normal ECGs (category 1) were extremely low risk for acute myocardial infarction. Patients with abnormal ECGs but no evidence of definite ischemia (category 2) had a relatively low incidence of MI. Patients with abnormal ECGs questionable for ischemia (category 3) had an intermediate risk of acute myocardial infarction. The majority of patients with abnormal ECGs demonstrating ischemia (category 4) were subsequently shown to evolve an acute myocardial infarction.
Conclusions
Patients with chest pain and initial ECGs with ST segment abnormalities suggestive or diagnostic for ischemia, should be admitted to the hospital for further evaluation and management. Patients with ECGs that do not display acute ST segment changes are at a lower risk for acute myocardial infarction than those with acute ST segment changes and should be admitted on the basis of cardiac risk profile. (i.e., age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, known coronary artery disease, etc.) Patients with normal ECGs (category 1) are at extremely low risk, and it may be acceptable to consider further evaluation on an outpatient basis. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: electrocardiogram; chest pain; acute myocardial infarction, hospital admission
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (234.3 KB).
References
- 1. Fromm R, Meyer D, Zimmerman J, Boudreaux A, Wun C, et al.: A double‐blind, Multicentered Study comparing the accuracy of diagnostic Markers to predict short‐ and long‐term clinical Events and their Utility in Patients Presenting with chest pain. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24(7): 516–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rouan GW, Lee TH, Cook EF, Brand DA, Weisberg MC, et al.: Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms (a report from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study). Am J Cardiol 1989; 64(18): 1087–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lloyd‐Jones DM, Camargo CA, Lapuerta P, Giugliano RP, O'Donnell CJ: Electrocardiographic and clinical predictors of acute myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 1182–1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lee TH, Cook EF, Weisberg M, Sargent RK, Wilson C, et al.: Acute chest pain in the emergency room; identification and examination of low‐risk patients. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 65–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lee TH, Cook EF, Weisberg MC, Rouan GW, Brand DA, et al.: Impact of the availability of a prior electrocardiogram on the triage of the patient with acute chest pain. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: 381–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bell MR, Montarello JK, Steele PM: Does the emergency room electrocardiogram identify patients with suspected myocardial infarction Who are at low risk of acute complications? Aust N Z J Med 1990; 20: 564–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink P, McCabe CH, Horacek T, et al.: The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/Non‐ST elevation MI. JAMA 2000; 284(7): 835–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Koukkunen H, Pyorala K, Halinen MO: Low‐risk Patients with chest pain and without evidence of myocardial infarction may be safetly discharged from emergency department. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 329–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brush JE, Brand DA, Acampora D, Chalmer B, Wackers FJ. Use of the initial electrocardiogram to predict in‐hospital complications of acute myocardial infarction. New Engl J 1985; 312: 1137–1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]