Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2010 Feb 23;33(2):99–103. doi: 10.1002/clc.20691

Gender Differences in the Treatment of Non–ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Dale Tavris 1,✉, Azadeh Shoaibi 1, Anita Y Chen 3, Takahiro Uchida 2, Matthew T Roe 3, Jiping Chen 1
PMCID: PMC6652882  PMID: 20186991

Abstract

Background

Women are at greater risk for worse outcomes associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than are men. One explanation may be that they tend to be treated less aggressively than men even when more aggressive treatment is warranted. The purpose of this analysis was to assess this issue.

Methods

We used the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation (CRUSADE) Quality Improvement Initiative registry, an observational data collection that began in November 2001, with retrospective data collection from January 2001 to December 2006. A total of 32 888 subjects met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for our study, based on strong biochemical evidence of myocardial infarction and acute onset of typical cardiac chest pain. We stratified subjects into 16 cells for coronary intervention, based on 4 age groups and 4 cardiac catheterization findings (insignificant, 1‐vessel disease, 2‐vessel disease, 3‐vessel disease). We also stratified subjects into 20 cells for medical treatment, based on 4 age groups and 5 medical treatments. In each cell we compared the rate of coronary intervention (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention) or medical treatment (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, aspirin, clopidogrel, β‐blocker, and statins) for men vs women.

Results

Men demonstrated significantly higher rates (P < 0.05) of coronary intervention in 7 of the 16 cells and 9 of the 20 medical treatment cells, compared to no cells in which women had statistically higher rates than men.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that men are more likely than women to receive coronary intervention and to be medically treated when presenting with evidence of non–ST‐segment myocardial infarction, controlled for age, cardiac catheterization findings, and biochemical evidence of myocardial infarction. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.8 KB).

References

  • 1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Writing Group Members . AHA Statistical Update, Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2007 Update, A Report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115: e69–e171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Neill J, Adgey J. Predictors excess mortality after myocardial infarction in women. Ulster Med J 2008; 77(2): 89–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Alfredsson J, Stenestrand U, Wallentin L, Swahn E. Gender diff‐ erences in management and outcome in non–ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 2007; 93: 1357–1362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bennett SK, Redberg RF. Acute coronary syndromes in women: is treatment different? Should it be? Curr Cardiol Rep 2004; 6: 243–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Willingham SAM, Kilpatrick ES. Evidence of gender bias when applying the new diagnostic criteria for myocardial infarction. Heart 2005; 91(2): 237–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Blomkalns AL, Chen AY, Hochman JS, et al. Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non–st‐segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large scale observations from the CRUSADE national quality improvement initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45(6): 832–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Novack V, Cutlip DE, Jotkowitz A, et al. Reduction in sex‐based mortality difference with implementation of new cardiology guidelines. Am J Med 2008; 121: 597–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Herlitz J, Dellborg M, Karlsson T, et al. Treatment and outcome in acute myocardial infarction in a community in relation to gender. Int J Cardiol 135; 3: 315–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hung J, Chaitman B, Lam J, et al. Noninvasive diagnostic test choices for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in women: a multivariate comparison of cardiac fluoroscopy, exercise electrocardiography and exercise thallium myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 8–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hochman JS, McCabe CH, Stone PH, et al. TIMI Investigators . Outcome and profile of women and men presenting with acute coronary syndromes: a report from thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI IIIB). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 141–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Guiteras P, Chaitman B, Waters D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG lead systems in clinical subsets of women. Circulation 1982; 65: 1465–1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Scirica BM, Moliterno DJ, Every NR, et al. GUARANTEE Investigators . Differences between men and women in the management of unstable angina pectoris (the GUARANTEE Registry). Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1145–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sullivan AK. Chest pain in women: clinical, investigative, and prognostic features. BMJ 1994; 308: 883–886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, et al. Exercise stress testing: correlations among history of angina, st segment response and prevalence of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). N Engl J Med 1979; 301: 230–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Blomkalns AL, Roe MT, Peterson ED, et al. Guideline imple‐ mentation research: exploring the gap between evidence and practice in the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14(11): 949–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.CRUSADE DCF Instructions Rv. 3.0 01 April 2005; 1–16.
  • 17. Jneid H, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, et al. Sex differences in medical care and early death after acute myocardial. Circulation 2008; 118(25): 2803–2810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nguyen JT, Berger AK, Duval S, Luepker RV. Gender disparities in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2008; 155: 862–868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Krumholz HM, Douglas PS, Lauer MS, et al. Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias? Ann Intern Med 1992; 116(10): 869–871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Setoguchi S, Solomon DH, Levin R, Winkelmayer WC. Gender differences in the management and prognosis of myocardial infarction among patients ≥ 65 years of age. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 1531–1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES