Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2008 Nov 12;31(11):525–530. doi: 10.1002/clc.20314

Gender Differences on Brachial Flow‐mediated Dilation and Carotid Intima‐media Thickness for Prediction of Spontaneous Cardiovascular Events

Rui Hu 1, Wei‐Qun Wang 1, Chu‐Pak Lau 2, Hung‐Fat Tse 2,✉
PMCID: PMC6652945  PMID: 19006116

Abstract

Background

Impaired brachial flow‐mediated dilation (FMD) and increased carotid intima‐media thickness (IMT) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events.

Methods

We measured brachial FMD and a mean of 12 sites maximum carotid IMT (mmIMT) in 279 patients (mean age 62 ± 12 y; 163 men) admitted for coronary angiography due to chest pain.

Hypothesis

There are gender differences in the predictive values of FMD and IMT for cardiovascular events.

Results

Univariable analysis showed that impaired FMD (p < 0.001), but not increased mmIMT (p = 0.056), significantly predicted spontaneous cardiovascular events. After adjusting for the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) and other clinical variables, age (heart rate [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01‐1.09, p = 0.017) and FMD (HR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75‐0.97, p = 0.012) were independent predictors for cardiovascular events. A total of 148 (53%) patients had CAD (≥50% diameter stenosis). Over a median follow‐up of 16 mo, 36 (12.9%) patients experienced spontaneous cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, stroke, acute myocardial infarction [MI], unstable angina pectoris, and congestive heart failure [HF]). Women were more likely than men to develop cardiovascular events in patients without significant CAD (11.9% versus 1.6%, odds ratio [OR] = 8.54, p = 0.033), but not in those patients with CAD (20.4 % versus 17.2%, OR = 1.24, p = 0.66). Moreover, women accounted for 8 (88.9%) events in non‐CAD patients. Furthermore, impaired FMD predicted the occurrence of cardiovascular events in both men and women (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Brachial FMD, rather than carotid IMT, was an independent predictor for cardiovascular events after adjusting for the extent of CAD. Moreover, impaired brachial endothelial function in women without significant CAD was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous cardiovascular events. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: flow‐mediated dilation, intima‐media thickness, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular events

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (301.6 KB).

References

  • 1. Sankatsing RR, de Groot E, Jukema JW, de Feyter PJ, Pennell DJ, et al.: Surrogate markers for atherosclerotic disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 2005; 16: 434–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yan RT, Anderson TJ, Charbonneau F, Title L, Verma S, et al.: Relationship between carotid artery intima‐media thickness and brachial artery flow‐mediated dilation in middle‐aged healthy men. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1980–1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shimbo D, Grahame‐Clarke C, Miyake Y, Rodriguez C, Sciacca R, et al.: The association between endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes in a population‐based multi‐ethnic cohort. Atherosclerosis 2007; 192: 197–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lorenz MW, von Kegler S, Steinmetz H, Markus HS, Sitzer M: Carotid intima‐media thickening indicates a higher vascular risk across a wide age range: prospective data from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Stroke 2006; 37: 87–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Frick M, Suessenbacher A, Alber HF, Dichtl W, Ulmer H, et al.: Prognostic value of brachial artery endothelial function and wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1006–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chan SY, Mancini GB, Kuramoto L, Schulzer M, Frohlich J, et al.: The prognostic importance of endothelial dysfunction and carotid atheroma burden in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1037–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fathi R, Haluska B, Isbel N, Short L, Marwick TH: The relative importance of vascular structure and function in predicting cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 616–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hu R, Zhang XX, Wang WQ, Lau CP, Tse HF: Smoking, homocysteine and degree of arteriolar retinopathy. Atherosclerosis 2005; 183: 95–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Werner N, Kosiol S, Schiegl T, Ahlers P, Walenta K, et al.: Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 999–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ip MS, Tse HF, Lam B, Tsang KW, Lam WK: Endothelial function in obstructive sleep apnea and response to treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169: 348–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer D, Charbonneau F, et al.: Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial‐dependent flow‐mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 257–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lau KK, Chan YH, Yiu KH, Li SW, Tam S, et al.: Burden of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with stroke: relationships with circulating endothelial progenitor cells and hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2007; 21: 445–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC Jr, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, et al.: Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA 2003; 289: 194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sinha AK, Eigenbrodt M, Mehta JL: Does carotid intima media thickness indicate coronary atherosclerosis? Curr Opin Cardiol 2002; 17: 526–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. von Mering GO, Arant CB, Wessel TR, McGorray SP, Bairey Merz CN, et al.: Abnormal coronary vasomotion as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular events in women: results from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute‐Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation 2004; 109: 722–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Crouse JR III: Predictive value of carotid 2‐dimensional ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 27E–30E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Krejza J, Arkuszewski M, Kasner SE, Weigele J, Ustymowicz A, et al.: Carotid artery diameter in men and women and the relation to body and neck size. Stroke 2006; 37: 1103–1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pepine CJ, Kerensky RA, Lambert CR, Smith KM, von Mering GO, et al.: Some thoughts on the vasculopathy of women with ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: S30–S35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Heiss G, Sharrett AR, Barnes R, Chambless LE, Szklo M, et al.: Carotid atherosclerosis measured by B‐mode ultrasound in populations: associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 250–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Graner M, Varpula M, Kahri J, Salonen RM, Nyyssonen K, et al.: Association of carotid intima‐media thickness with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 624–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES