Abstract
Background
The prognostic value of peak cardiac troponin (cTn) in different types of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) under the universal clinical classification is unknown.
Hypothesis
We tested the hypothesis that the prognostic value of cTn varies with its peak level and type of AMI.
Methods
We studied 345 consecutive patients with AMI with mean follow‐up of 30.6 months according to quartiles of peak cTn level (QPTL) and the type of AMI. The study outcomes were the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of all causes of mortality and recurrent AMI) and the individual components of MACE.
Results
The study included patients with AMI Type 1 (n = 276), type 2 (n = 54), ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; n = 159), and non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; n = 186). Overall, peak cTn level was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.000–1.003, P = 0.01) and death (HR: 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001–1.004, P = 0.003), but not of recurrent AMI. The highest risk of MACE and death was in the highest QPTL (61.6%, P = .016 and 66.3%, P = 0.021, respectively) while the highest risk of recurrent AMI was in the lowest QPTL (83.7%, P = 0.04). Quartiles of peak cTn level were significantly associated with increased risk of MACE and death in patients with Type 1 (all P = 0.01) and STEMI (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively), but no association existed in type 2 or NSTEMI patients.
Conclusions
Overall, peak cTn predicts the risk of MACE and death but not the risk of AMI. While in Type 1 and STEMI patients, QPTL are associated with risk of MACE and death, no association exists in type 2 or NSTEMI patients. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (295.3 KB).
References
- 1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007; 116(22): 2634–2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000; 21(18): 1502–1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Goodman SG, Steg PG, Eagle KA, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic impact of the redefinition of acute myocardial infarction: lessons from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Am Heart J 2006; 151(3): 654–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Cardiac‐specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1996; 335(18): 1342–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Prasad A, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, et al. Significance of periprocedural myonecrosis on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Intervent 2008; 1: 10–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jeremias A, Kleiman NS, Nassif D, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of preprocedural cardiac troponin elevation among patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the evaluation of drug eluting stents and ischemic events registry. Circulation 2008; 118(6): 632–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mueller C, Neumann FJ, Perruchoud AP, et al. Prognostic value of quantitative troponin T measurements in unstable angina/non‐ST‐segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated early and predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Med 2004; 117(12): 897–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hochholzer W, Buettner HJ, Trenk D, et al. New definition of myocardial infarction: impact on long‐term mortality. Am J Med 2008; 121(5): 399–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pell JP, Simpson E, Rodger JC, et al. Impact of changing diagnostic criteria on incidence, management, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 326(7381): 134–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Salomaa V, Koukkunen H, Ketonen M, et al. A new definition for myocardial infarction: what difference does it make? Eur Heart J 2005; 26(17): 1719–1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Meier MA, Al‐Badr WH, Cooper JV, et al. The new definition of myocardial infarction: diagnostic and prognostic implications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162(14): 1585–1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Miller WL, Garratt KN, Burritt MF, et al. Baseline troponin level: key to understanding the importance of post‐PCI troponin elevations. Eur Heart J 2006; 27(9): 1061–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jaffe AS, Babuin L, Apple FS. Biomarkers in acute cardiac disease: the present and the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48(1): 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Apple FS, Murakami MM. Cardiac troponin and creatine kinase MB monitoring during in‐hospital myocardial reinfarction. Clin Chem 2005; 51(2): 460–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007; 116(7): e148–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Antman EM. Decision making with cardiac troponin tests. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(26): 2079–2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Jesse RL, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2007; 115(13): e356–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Selvanayagam JB, Porto I, Channon K, et al. Troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention directly represents the extent of irreversible myocardial injury: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2005; 111(8): 1027–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2008; 117(2): 296–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gonzalez MA ED, Marzouq RA, Porterfield CP, et al. The universal clinical classification of myocardial infarction is a better predictor of outcomes than the ST segment classification. Circulation 2008; (Abstr)(118): S579. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Furman MI, Dauerman HL, Goldberg RJ, et al. Twenty‐two year (1975 to 1997) trends in the incidence, in‐hospital and long‐term case fatality rates from initial Q‐wave and non‐Q‐wave myocardial infarction: a multi‐hospital, community‐wide perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37(6): 1571–1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Haim M, Behar S, Boyko V, et al. The prognosis of a first Q‐wave versus non‐Q‐wave myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era. Am J Med 2000; 108(5): 381–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Behar S, Haim M, Hod H, et al. Long‐term prognosis of patients after a Q wave compared with a non‐Q wave first acute myocardial infarction. Data from the SPRINT Registry. Eur Heart J 1996; 17(10): 1532–1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Montalescot G, Dallongeville J, Van Belle E, et al. STEMI and NSTEMI: are they so different? 1 year outcomes in acute myocardial infarction as defined by the ESC/ACC definition (the OPERA registry). Eur Heart J 2007; 28(12): 1409–1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Trevelyan J, Needham EW, Smith SC, Mattu RK. Impact of the recommendations for the redefinition of myocardial infarction on diagnosis and prognosis in an unselected United Kingdom cohort with suspected cardiac chest pain. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93(7): 817–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kontos MC, Fritz LM, Anderson FP, et al. Impact of the troponin standard on the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2003; 146(3): 446–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Koukkunen H, Penttila K, Kemppainen A, et al. Differences in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by troponin T compared with clinical and epidemiologic criteria. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(7): 727–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Rich‐Edwards JW, Corsano KA, Stampfer MJ. Test of the National Death Index and Equifax Nationwide Death Search. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140(11): 1016–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sesso HD, Paffenbarger RS, Lee IM. Comparison of National Death Index and World Wide Web death searches. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152(2): 107–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]