Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Apr 20;32(6):E45–E50. doi: 10.1002/clc.20354

The Clinical Manifestation of Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients

Aleksander Goch 1,✉, Paweł Misiewicz 2, Jacek Rysz 3, Maciej Banach 4
PMCID: PMC6653078  PMID: 19382276

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis

The study aimed to compare the clinical picture and treatment differences in elderly patients (aged 75 years or older) and younger patients (aged below 75 years).

Methods

The study included 80 consecutive patients with myocardial infarction (MI) treated in the Cardiology Ward of the Specialist Hospital in Radom, Poland, in 2005. Analyses were performed retrospectively. The patients were separated into 2 groups according to age. The group I study group consisted of 40 patients aged 75 or over (aged 75–95; mean 81 years) and the group II control group consisted of 40 patients aged below 75 years (aged 42–67; mean 60 years).

Results

In the elderly, as compared with younger subjects, dyspnea, fatigue, and other heart failure symptoms, were more frequently the first symptoms of MI than typical chest pain (p<0.05). ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was also more common (p<0.05). Non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was more frequently diagnosed in the elderly (p<0.05). In elderly patients there were more women (p<0.05), more patients with previously diagnosed ischemic heart disease (p<0.05), with hypertension (p<0.05), and with diabetes mellitus (p<0.05). Obesity was less frequently diagnosed in the elderly; however the difference was not statistically significant. Dyslipidemia and cigarette smoking were both significantly less common among elderly patients (p<0.05). The elderly were significantly less frequently revascularized (p<0.05). Both fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were less commonly applied to the elderly (p<0.05). Time from symptom onset to hospital admission was significantly longer in the case of elderly patients (p<0.05). The MI complications and side effects of treatment seemed to be more frequent in the elderly, but only post‐MI heart failure was observed more frequently in this group of patients (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Our observations confirm the differences in the clinical picture of MI in the elderly as described previously. All patients of advanced age should be considered as having the highest risk of death and complications occurrence. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.6 KB).

References

  • 1. Kitazume H, Kubo I, Iwama T, Ageishi Y, Suzuki A. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for elderly patients. Circ J. 1988; 52: 449–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 723–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. DeGeare VS, Stone GW, Grines L. Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased in‐hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention (A pooled analysis of the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials). Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 30–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ, et al. Predictors of 30‐day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction: results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. Circulation. 1995; 91: 1659–1668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Devlin W, Cragg D, Jacks M. Comparison of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction aged 75 years with that in younger patients. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 573–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Grines CL, Westerhausen DR, Grines LL, et al; Air PAMI Study Group. A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on‐site thrombolysis in patients with high‐risk myocardial infarction: the air primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39(11): 1713–1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kowalski J, Banach M, Barylski M, et al. Neutrophil superoxide anion generation during atorvastatin and fluvastatin therapy used in coronary heart disease primary prevention. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2006; 48: 143–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rich MW. Epidemiology, clinical features, and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2006; 15: 7–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Thompson RC, Holmus DR Jr, Gersh BJ, Mock MB, Bailey KR. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the elderly: early and long term results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 17: 1245–1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for Myocardial Infarction Redefinition. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 1502–1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch‐Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Third joint task force of European and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. European Heart J. 2003; 24: 1601–1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. AIMS Trial Study Group . Effect of intravenous APSAC on mortality after acute myocardial infarction: preliminary report of a placebo controlled trial. Lancet. 1989; 1: 545–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chesbro JH; TIMI Investigators. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Circulation. 1987; 76: 142–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Akiyama J, Aonuma K, Nogami A, et al. Thrombolytic therapy can reduce the arrhythmogenic substrate after acute myocardial infarction: a study using the signal‐averaged electrocardiogram, endocardial catheter mapping and programmed ventricular stimulation. Circ J. 1999; 63: 838–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Banach M, Drożdż J, Okonski P, Rysz J. Immunological aspects of the statins' function in patients with heart failure: a report from the Annual Conference of ESC—Heart Failure 2005. Cell Mol Immunol. 2005; 2: 433–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Muller RT, Gould LA, Betzu RY, Vacek T, Pradeek V. Painless myocardial infarction in the elderly. Am Heart J. 1990; 119: 202–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Gregoratos G. Clinical manifestations of acute myocardial infarction in older patients. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2001; 10: 345–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Miller PF, Sheps DS, Bragdon EE, et al. Aging and pain perception in ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J. 1990; 12: 22–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bayer AL, Chadha JS, Farag RR, Pathy MS. Changing presentation of myocardial infarction with increasing old age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986; 34: 263–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Paul DS, O'Gara PT, Mahjoub ZA, et al. Geriatric patients with acute myocardial infarction: cardiac risk profiles, presentation, thrombolysis, coronary interventions, and prognosis. Am Heart J. 1996; 131: 710–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Haase KK, Schiele R, Wagner S, et al. In‐hospital mortality of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from MITRA (Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction) registry. Clin Cardiol. 2000; 23: 831–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Smith SC, Gilpin E, Ahnve S, et al. Outlook after acute myocardial infarction in the very elderly compared with that in patients aged 65 to 75 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 16: 784–792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Matetzky S, Sharir T, Moc M, et al. Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in octogenarians. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 680–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Banach M, Goch A, Misztal M, et al. Low output syndrome following aortic valve replacement: predictors and prognosis. Arch Med Sci. 2007; 3: 117–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Harpaz D, Rozenman Y, Behar S, et al. Israeli Working Group on Intensive Cardiac Care, Israel Heart Society: coronary angiography in the elderly with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2007; 116: 249–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kosuge M, Kimura K, Kojima S, et al. Japanese Acute Coronary Syndrome Study (JACSS) Investigators: beneficial effect of preinfarction angina on in‐hospital outcome is preserved in elderly patients undergoing coronary intervention for anterior acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2005; 69(6): 630–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KA, et al. Routine vs selective strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta‐analysis of randomised trials. JAMA. 2005; 293: 2908–2917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Goch A, Banach M, Piotrowski G, Szadkowska I, Goch JH. Echocardiographic evaluation of left atrium and left atrium appendage function in patients with atrial septum aneurysm: implications for thromboembolic complications. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 55: 365–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES