Abstract
Background
The current recommendation for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients is based on QRS duration, not on QRS morphology.
Hypothesis
This study was performed to compare the effects of CRT in CHF patients with pure RBBB vs those with a coexisting left hemiblock (LHB).
Methods and Patient Population
A total of 271 consecutive patients who underwent CRT at Montefiore Medical Center were analyzed. Baseline ECGs were analyzed by 2 reviewers for RBBB and further classified into those with a coexisting LHB. Response to CRT was defined to be, at ≥ 6 months after CRT, either an improvement in ejection fraction (EF) of at least 5%, or an improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) CHF class. A total of 44 patients were identified: 18 had pure RBBB and 26 had a coexisting LHB. The 2 groups were similar in respect to baseline characteristics (P > 0.05).
Results
Only 4 out of 18 patients with pure RBBB compared to 18 out of 26 with LHB (P = 0.005) had an improvement in EF ≥ 5%. The mean EF was − 1% in the pure RBBB group, but + 5.4% in those with LHB (P = 0.0031). Improvement in NYHA class was seen in 0 out of 18 with pure RBBB vs 7 out of 26 patients with LHB (P = 0.03).
Conclusion
If patients with RBBB also had LHB, their response to CRT was significantly better than if they had RBBB alone. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (140.4 KB).
References
- 1. Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, et al. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 873–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL, et al. Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 2685–2694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1845–1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Higgins SL, Hummel JD, Niazi IK, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treatment of heart failure in patients with intraventricular conduction delay and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1454–1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S, et al. Long‐term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the multisite stimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40(1): 111–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al; Cardiac Resynchronization‐Heart Failure (CARE‐HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(15): 1539–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Egoavil CA, Ho RT, Greenspon AJ, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with right bundle branch block: analysis of pooled data from the MIRACLE and Contak CD trials. Heart Rhythm 2005; 2: 611–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Adelstein, EC , Saba, S. Usefulness of baseline electrocardiographic QRS complex pattern to predict response to cardiac resynchronization. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 238–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Aranda JM Jr, Conti JB, Johnson JW, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and conduction abnormalities other than left bundle‐branch block: analysis of the multicenter insync randomized clinical evaluation (MIRACLE). Clin Cardiol 2004; 27(12): 678–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. TitcolorGarrigue S, TitcolorReuter S, TitcolorLabeque JN, et al. Usefulness of biventricular pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and right bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 1436–1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram, part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances. Circulation 2009; 53(11): 976–981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Feigenbaum H, Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Detection and quantification of wall motion abnormalities In: Feigenbaum's Echocardiography, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005; 443–450. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fantoni C, Kawabata M, Massaro R, et al. Right and left ventricular activation sequence in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a detailed analysis using three‐dimensional non‐fluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005; 16(2): 112–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Byrne MJ, Helm RH, Daya S, et al. Diminished left ventricular dyssynchrony and impact of resynchronization in failing hearts with right vs left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50(15): 1484–1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Haghjoo M, Bagherzadeh A, Farahani MM, et al. Significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization: particular focus on patients with right bundle branch block with and without coexistent left‐sided conduction defects. Europace 2008; 10: 566–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Fauchier L, Marie O, Casset‐Senon D, et al. Reliability of QRS duration and morphology on surface electrocardiogram to identify ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92(3): 341–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]