Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Jun 30;32(6):321–326. doi: 10.1002/clc.20551

Upstream High‐Dose Tirofiban Does Not Reduce Myocardial Infarct Size in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pilot Study

Young Bin Song 1, Joo‐Yong Hahn 1, Hyeon‐Cheol Gwon 1,, Jun Hyung Kim 1, Sang Yeub Lee 1, Yeon Hyeon Choe 1, Seung‐Hyuk Choi 1, Jin‐Ho Choi 1, Sang Hoon Lee 1
PMCID: PMC6653249  PMID: 19569068

Abstract

Background

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective than fibrinolytic therapy for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but initial treatment delay to intervention is the main limitation of this strategy. Hypothesis: Upstream use of high‐dose tirofiban could reduce myocardial infarct size, using analysis of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI).

Methods

Patients with STEMI within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomized to a facilitated PCI group (n = 19) or to a primary PCI group (n = 20). The primary endpoint was myocardial infarct size evaluated by the volume of delayed hyperenhancement on CE‐MRI at 1 month after index procedure.

Results

The baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Although the incidence of pre‐PCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 to 3 was significantly higher in the facilitated PCI group than in the primary PCI group (47.4% vs 15.0%, P = 0.03), the achievement of myocardial blush grade 2 to 3 or ST‐segment resolution at 30 minutes after procedure was not significantly different between the facilitated PCI and the primary PCI group (36.8% vs 40%, P = 0.84 and 31.6% vs 20%, P = 0.41, respectively). Infarct size on CE‐MRI was similar in the facilitated PCI group and the conventional primary PCI group (22.1% ± 11.7% vs 25.2% ± 13.2%, P = 0.44). At 6 months, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on echocardiography was 52.6% ± 10.4% in the facilitated PCI group and 50.9% ± 9.8% in the primary PCI group (P = 0.68).

Conclusion

Despite the improvement of initial TIMI flow grade, the upstream use of high‐dose tirofiban did not reduce myocardial infarct size measured by CE‐MRI. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.8 KB).

References

  • 1. Gunasekara AP, Walters DL, Aroney CN. Comparison of abciximab with “high‐dose” tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol 2006; 109: 16–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. van 't Hof AW, Ernst N, de Boer MJ, et al. Facilitation of primary coronary angioplasty by early start of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor: results of the ongoing tirofiban in myocardial infarction evaluation (On‐TIME) trial. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 837–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ernst NM, Suryapranata H, Miedema K, et al. Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1187–1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Valgimigli M, Percoco G, Barbieri D, et al. The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high‐dose bolus in the prevention of ischemic complications during high‐risk coronary angioplasty: the ADVANCE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 14–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, Collet JP, Thomas D. Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta‐analysis. JAMA 2004; 292: 362–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Thiele H, Kappl MJ, Conradi S, Niebauer J, Hambrecht R, Schuler G. Reproducibility of chronic and acute infarct size measurement by delayed enhancement‐magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1641–1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gersh BJ, Anderson JL. Thrombolysis and myocardial salvage. Results of clinical trials and the animal paradigm—paradoxic or predictable? Circulation 1993; 88: 296–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Claeys MJ, Bosmans J, Veenstra L, Jorens P, De Raedt H, Vrints CJ. Determinants and prognostic implications of persistent ST‐segment elevation after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: importance of microvascular reperfusion injury on clinical outcome. Circulation 1999; 99: 1972–1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. van 't Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation 1998; 97: 2302–2306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hahn JY, Gwon HC, Choe YH, et al. Effects of balloon‐based distal protection during primary percutaneous coronary intervention on early and late infarct size and left ventricular remodeling: a pilot study using serial contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2007; 153: 665 e661–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Choe YH, Choo KS, Jeon ES, Gwon HC, Choi JH, Park JE. Comparison of MDCT and MRI in the detection and sizing of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66: 292–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1445–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Martin ET, Fuisz AR, Pohost GM. Imaging cardiac structure and pump function. Cardiol Clin 1998; 16: 135–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Orn S, Manhenke C, Anand IS, et al. Effect of left ventricular scar size, location, and transmurality on left ventricular remodeling with healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1109–1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Batchelor WB, Tolleson TR, Huang Y, et al. Randomized comparison of platelet inhibition with abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the COMPARE trial. Comparison of measurements of platelet aggregation with aggrastat, reopro, and eptifibatide. Circulation 2002; 106: 1470–1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, et al. Facilitated PCI in patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2205–2217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Stone GW, Cox D, Garcia E, et al. Normal flow (TIMI‐3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials. Circulation 2001; 104: 636–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100: 1992–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Beek AM, Kuhl HP, Bondarenko O, et al. Delayed contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 895–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Holly TA, et al. Reproducibility of chronic infarct size measurement by contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002; 106: 2322–2327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Steen H, Lehrke S, Wiegand UK, et al. Very early cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for quantification of myocardial tissue perfusion in patients receiving tirofiban before percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2005; 149(564): e561–e567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES