Skip to main content
PMC home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2007 Sep 19;30(10):491–495. doi: 10.1002/clc.20000

A Systematic Review of Gender Differences in Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Catherine Kim 1,✉, Rita F Redberg 1, Tiana Pavlic 1, Kim A Eagle 1
PMCID: PMC6653288  PMID: 17880013

Abstract

Gender differences exist in outcomes, particularly early mortality, for percutaneous interventions (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Better understanding of this issue may target areas for improvement for all patients undergoing revascularization. Therefore, we summarized the evidence on gender differences in PCI and CABG outcomes, particularly early mortality, and mediators of this difference. Using the key terms “women” or “gender,” “revascularization,” “coronary artery bypass,” “angioplasty,” “stent,” and “coronary intervention,” we searched MEDLINE from 1985 to 2005 for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and registries reporting outcomes by gender. Bibliographies and the Web sites of cardiology conferences were also reviewed. The literature was examined to identify gender differences in outcomes and mediators of these differences. We identified 23 studies reporting outcomes by gender for CABG and 48 studies reporting outcomes by gender for PCI. The majority of studies noted greater in‐hospital mortality in women than in men, with mortality differences resolving with longer follow‐up. Early mortality differences were reduced but not consistently eliminated after adjustment for comorbidities, procedural characteristics, and body habitus. Power to detect gender differences after multivariate adjustment was limited by declining mortality rates and small sample size. Gender was an independent risk factor for complications after both CABG and PCI. Women experience greater complications and early mortality after revascularization. Future exploration is needed of gender differences in quality of care and benefit from combinations of stenting and antiplatelet, and anticoagulant medications in order to optimize treatment. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: women, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, outcomes, gender, review

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.8 KB).

References

  • 1. American Heart Association . Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2005 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Moschi G, Migliorini A, Trapani M, et al.: Sex‐based differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 289–293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fisher L, Kennedy J, Davis K, Maynard C, Fritz J, et al.: Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84: 334–341 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cowley M, Mullin S, Kelsey S, Kent K, Gruentzig A, et al.: Sex differences in early and long‐term results of coronary angioplasty in the NHLBI PTCA Registry. Circulation 1985; 71(1): 90–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vaccarino V, Abramson J, Veledar E, Weintraub W: Sex differences in hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. Evidence for a higher mortality in younger women. Circulation 2002; 105: 1176–1181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Bollwein H, Dibra A, Schuhlen H, et al.: Gender and restenosis after coronary artery stenting. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1523–1530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Bollwein H, Neumann F, et al.: Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting. J Am Med Assoc 2000; 284(14): 1799–1805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jackevicius C, Pinto R, Daly P, Mackie K, Dzavik V: Routine use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy is associated with an improved in‐hospital outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a large, prospective, single‐centre registry. Can J Cardiol 2005; 21(1): 27–32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Alfonso F, Hernandez R, Banuelos C, Fernandez‐Ortiz A, Escaned J, et al.: Initial results and long‐term clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary stenting in women. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1380–1383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ellis S, Myler R, King S, Douglas JJ, Topol E, et al.: Causes and correlates of death after unsupported coronary angioplasty: Implications for use of angioplasty and advanced support techniques in high‐risk settings. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1447–1451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Malenka D, Wennberg D, Quinton H, O'Rourke D, McGrath P, et al.: Gender‐related changes in the practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in Northern New England from 1994 to 1999. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40(12): 2092–2101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Iyer V, Russell W, Leppard P, Craddock D: Mortality and myocardial infarction after coronary artery surgery. A review of 12,003 patients. Med J Aust 1993; 159: 166–170 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Weintraub W, Wenger N, Jones E, Craver J, Guyton R: Changing clinical characteristics of coronary surgery patients: Differences between men and women. Circulation 1993; 88(part 2): 79–86 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. O'Connor N, Morton J, Birkmeyer J, Olmstead E, O'Connor G, for the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group : Effect of coronary artery diameter in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 1996; 93(4): 652–655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mickleborough L: Gender differences in quality of distal vessels: Effect on results of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 950–958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Robertson T, Kennard E, Mehta S, Popma J, Carrozza J, et al.: Influence of gender on in‐hospital clinical and angiographic outcomes and on one‐year follow‐up in the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) Registry. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80(10A): 26K–39K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Woods S, Noble G, Smith J, Hassefeld K: The influence of gender in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: An eight‐year prospective hospitalized cohort study. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196: 428–434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sheifer S, Canos M, Weinfurt K, Arora U, Mendelsohn F, et al.: Sex differences in coronary artery size assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 649–653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cantor W, Miller J, Hellkamp A, Kramer J, Peterson E, et al.: Role of target vessel size and body surface area on outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in women. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 297–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hogue C, Barzilai B, Pieper K, Coombs L, DeLong E, et al.: Sex differences in neurological outcomes and mortality after cardiac surgery: A Society of Thoracic Surgery National Database Report. Circulation 2001; 103: 2133–2137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Christakis G, Weisel R, Buth K, Fremes S, Rao V, et al.: Is body size the cause for poor outcomes of coronary artery bypass operations in women? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110(5): 1344–1356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Edwards F, Carey J, Grover F, Bero J, Hartz R: Impact of gender on coronary bypass operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(1): 125–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Clayton T, Pocock S, Henderson R, Poole‐Wilson P, Shaw T, et al.: Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction? The impact of gender in the RITA‐3 Trial. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1641–1650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kelsey S, James M, Holubkov A, Holubkov R, Cowley M, et al.: Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985‐1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation 1993; 87: 720–727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lansky A, Mehran R, Dangas G, Desai K, Costantini‐Ortiz C, et al.: New‐device angioplasty in women: Clinical outcome and predictors in a 7,372‐patient registry. Epidemiology 2002; 13: S46–S51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Guru V, Fremes S, Tu J: Time‐related mortality for women after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A population‐based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 1158–1165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lansky A, Pietras C, Costa R, Tsuchiya Y, Brodie B, et al.: Gender differences in outcomes after primary angioplasty versus primary stenting with and without abciximab for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2005; 111: 1611–1618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Peterson E, Lansky A, Kramer J, Anstrom K, Lanzilotta M: Effect of gender on the outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 359–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bell M, Holmes DJ, Berger P, Garratt K, Bailey K, et al.: The changing in‐hospital mortality of women undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 269(16): 2091–2095 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Arnold A, Mick M, Piedmonte M, Simpfendorfer C: Gender differences for coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74(1): 18–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Weintraub W, Wenger N, Kosinski A, Douglas JJ, Liberman H, et al.: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women compared with men. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24(1): 81–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hartz R, Rao A, Plomondon M, Grover F, Shroyer A: Effects of race, with or without gender, on operative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting: A study using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 512–520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Abramov D, Tamariz M, Sever J, Chrstakis G, Bhatnagar G, et al.: The influence of gender on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 800–806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Trabattoni D, Bartorelli A, Montorsi P, Fabbiocchi F, Loaldi A, et al.: Comparison of outcomes in women and men treated with coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003; 58: 20–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Stone G, Grines C, Browne K, Marco J, Rothbaum D, et al.: Comparison of in‐hospital outcome in men versus women treated by either thrombolytic therapy or primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 987–992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Vakili B, Kaplan R, Brown D: Sex‐based differences in early mortality of patients undergoing primary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2001; 104: 3034–3038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Blomkalns A, Chen A, Hochman J, Peterson E, Trynosky K, et al.: Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non‐ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Large‐scale observations from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45(6): 832–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Khan S, Nessim S, Gray R, Czer L, Chaux A, et al.: Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: Evidence for referral bias. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 561–567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sadanandan S, Cannon C, Gibson C, Murphy S, DiBattiste P, et al.: A risk score to estimate the likelihood of coronary artery bypass surgery during the index hospitalization among patients with unstable angina and non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44(4): 799–803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Thompson C, Humphries K, Gao M, Galbraith P, Norris C, et al.: Revascularization use and survival outcomes after cardiac catheterization in British Columbia and Alberta. Can J Cardiol 2004; 20(14): 1417–1423 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chandra N, Ziegelstein R, Rogers W, Tiefenbrunn A, Gore J, et al.: Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: A report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction‐I. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(9): 981–988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Seshadri N, Whitlow P, Acharya N, Houghtaling P, Blackstone E, et al.: Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention area. Circulation 2002; 106(18): 2346–2350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Watanabe C, Maynard C, Ritchie J: Comparison of short‐term outcomes following coronary artery stenting in men versus women. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 848–852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Jacobs A, Kelsey S, Brooks M, Faxon D, Chaitman B, et al.: Better outcome for women compared with men undergoing coronary revascularization. Circulation 1998; 98: 1279–1285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Aldea G, Gaudiani J, Shapira O, Jacobs A, Weinberg J, et al.: Effect of gender on postoperative outcomes and hospital stays after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67(4): 1097–1103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Davierwala P, Maganti M, Yau T: Decreasing significance of left ventricular dysfunction and reoperative surgery in predicting coronary artery bypass grafting‐associated mortality: A twelve‐year study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126(5): 1335–1344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Eagle K, Guyston R, Davidoff R, Edwards F, Ewy G, et al.:ACC/AHA 2004 Guideline Update for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association Available at:www.americanheart.org. Accessed April, 2005.
  • 48. Mack M, Brown P, Kugelmass A, Battaglia S, Tarkington L, et al.: Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77(3): 761–766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Brener S, Lytle B, Casserly I, Schneider J, Topol E, et al.: Propensity analysis of long‐term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high‐risk features. Circulation 2004; 109: 2290–2295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Anand S, Xie C, Mehta S, Franzosi M, Joyner C, et al.: For the CURE Investigators: Differences in the management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(10): 1845–1851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. The CAPTURE Investigators : Randomised placebo‐controlled trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: The CAPTURE study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1429‐1435 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. The EPIC Investigators : Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high‐risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994; 330(14): 956–961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. The EPILOG Investigators : Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low‐dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1689–1696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Topol E, Moliterno D, Herrmann H, Powers E, Grines C, et al.: Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1888–1894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Fernandes L, Tcheng J, O'Shea J, Weinber B, Lorenz T, et al.: Is glycoprotein IIB/IIIa antagonism as effective in women as in men following percutaneous coronary intervention? J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40(6): 1085–1091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Iakovou I, Dangas G, Mehran R, Lansky A, Kobayashi Y, et al.: Gender differences in clinical outcome after coronary artery stenting with use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 976–979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Roffi M, Mukherjee D, Chew D, Bhatt D, Cho L, et al.: Lack of benefit from intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition as adjunctive treatment for percutaneous interventions of aortocoronary bypass grafts: A pooled analysis of five randomized clinical trials. Circulation 2002; 106(24): 3063–3067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Vogt A, Engel H, Glunz H, Sattelberger U, Reil G, et al.: Early results of coronary angioplasty despite more complex interventions (Registry of the German Community Hospitals 1993‐2000). Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 1008–1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lansky A, Hochman J, Ward P, Mintz G, Fabunmi R, et al.: Percutaneous coronary intervention and adjunctive pharmacotherapy in women. A statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2005; 111: 940–953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lemos P, Serruys P, van Domburg R, Saia F, Arampatzis C, et al.: Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus‐eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the “real world.”Circulation 2004; 109: 190–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES