Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Jul 30;32(9):E40–E44. doi: 10.1002/clc.20475

Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban in High‐Risk Patients With Non‐ST‐Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Zhenxian Yan 1, YuJie Zhou 1,, Yingxin Zhao 1, Yueping Li 1, Xiaomin Nie 1, Zhiming Zhou 1, Dean Jia 1
PMCID: PMC6653350  PMID: 19645039

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in high risk patients with non‐ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE‐ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

A total of 240 patients were randomized to either a tirofiban group or a control group.

Results

Compared with the control group, the platelet aggregation rate in the tirofiban group was lower (P < 0.01); the plasma levels of CK‐MB and troponin I, cardiac form (cTnI) were lower (P < 0.05); ECG improved significantly (P < 0.05); the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was lower (P < 0.05); and there was no difference in bleeding complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.1).

Conclusions

The administration of tirofiban in high risk patients with NSTE‐ACS after PCI is safe and effective. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.5 KB).

References

  • 1. Hartman GD. Tirofiban hydrochloride: platelet antiaggregatory GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist. Drugs Future 1995; 20: 897–901. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Madan M, Berkawitz SD, Tcheng JE. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade. Circulation 1998; 98: 2629–2635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lynch JJ, Cook JJ, Sitko GR, et al. Nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Antithrombotic effects of MK‐0383. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995; 272: 20–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. The PRISM Study Investigators . A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1498–1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. PRISM‐PLUS Study Investigators . Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non‐Q‐wave myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1488–1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. RESTORE Investigators . Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1997; 96(5): 1445–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Okmen E, Sanli A, Uyarel H, Dayi S, Tartan Z, Cam N. Effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition with tirofiban on minor myocardial damage in angiographically successful percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Cardiology 2004; 102: 18–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhang Q, Zhang RY, Zhang JS, et al. One‐year clinical outcomes of Chinese sirolimus‐eluting stent in the treatment of unselected patients with coronary artery disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006; 119: 165–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lincoff AM, Popma JJ, Ellis SG, Hacker JA, Topol EJ. Abrupt vessel closure complicating coronary angioplasty: clinical, angiographic and therapeutic profile. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 926–935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Willerson JT. Inhibitors of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors: will they be useful when given chronically? Circulation 1996; 94: 866–868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Danzi GB, Capuano C, Migliorini A, Sesana M, Baglini R, Antoniucci D. Preliminary experience with a high bolus dose of tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr Med Opin 2003; 19: 28–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Valgimigli M, Percoco G, Malagutti P, et al. Tirofiban and sirolimus‐eluting stent vs abciximab and bare‐metal stent for acute myocardial infarction:a randomized trial. JAMA 2005; 293: 2109–2117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Teirstein PS, Kao J, Watkins M, et al. Impact of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition on the paclitaxel‐eluting stent in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris or provocable myocardial ischemia (a TAXUS IV substudy). Am J Cardiol 2005; 96(4): 500–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Braunwald E, Antman E, Beasley J, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36(3): 970–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. De Queiroz Fernandes Arau JO, Veloso HH, Braga De Paiva JM, Filho MW, Vincenzo De Paola AA. Efficacy and safety of abciximab on acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: A meta analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 937–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, Collet JP, Thomas D. Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta‐analysis. JAMA 2004; 292: 362–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non‐ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non‐ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction) . Circulation. 2007;116:e148–e304. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non‐ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non‐ST‐Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28:1598–1660. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES