Abstract
Background
We investigated the difference between left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy caused by primary hypertension and physiological LV hypertrophy in athletes as seen in left atrial (LA) function by real‐time tri‐plane strain rate imaging.
Hypothesis
A real‐time tri‐plane imaging technique using the same phase of the same cardiac circle was used to synchronously demonstrate the section of apical 4‐chamber, 2‐chamber, and apical left ventricle long axis.
Methods
We measured standard Doppler echocardiographic quantitative analysis and the strain rate peak values of each LA wall in the systolic phase, in the early stage of diastole, and in the advanced stage of diastole and made a comparison of these values.
Results
The alteration of configuration and function of the left atrium in hypertensive patients is an early sign of the myocardial damage caused by hypertension. Strain rate imaging could sensitively reflect LA function changes in the early stages of hypertension. While physiological, myocardial hypertrophy is a benign reaction, LA function is significantly different from that of hypertension.
Conclusions
Real‐time tri‐plane strain rate imaging techniques could simultaneously analyze 3 sections, which shortens scanning time and depletes the influence of variations of different cardiac cycles on quantitative analysis of local myocardial segments of the left atrium. This would improve the comparability of myocardial movement of different segments so that we could more comprehensively and accurately evaluate the systolic and diastolic function of the left atrium in primary hypertension and physiological LV hypertrophy in athletes. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).
References
- 1. Bai J, Deng YB. Strain rate imaging: a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Chin J Ultrasonogr 2003; 12(11): 690–692. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Palka P, Lange A, Fleming AD, et al. Differences in myocardial velocity gradient measured throughout the cardiac cycle in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, athletes and patients with left ventricular hypertrophy due to hypertension. J Am Col Cardiol 1997; 30: 760–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Devereux RB, Lutas EM, Casale PN, et al. Standardization of M‐mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 1222–1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lauschke J, Maisch B. Athlete's heart or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Clin Res Cardiol 2008; 11(13): 80–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Navlor LH, George K, O'Driscoll G. et al. The athletes heart: a contemporary appraisal of the morganroth hypothesis. Sport Med 2008; 38(1): 69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Basavarajaiah S, Boraita A, Whyte G, et al. Ethnic differences in left ventricular remodeling in highly‐trained athletes relevance to differentiating physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51(23): 2256–2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Vinereanu D, Florescu N, Sculthorpe N., et al. Differentiation between pathologic and physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy by tissue Doppler assessment of long‐axis function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or systemic hypertension and in athletes. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 53–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Basavarajaiah S, Wilson M, Whyte G, et al. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in highly trained athletes: relevance to pre‐participation screening. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51(10): 1033–1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Andrea A, Limongelli G, Caso P, et al. Association between left ventricular structure and cardiac performance during effort in two morphological form athlete's heart. Int J Cardiol 2002; 86: 177–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Derumeaux G, Douillet R, R, et al. Distinguishing between physiologic hypertrophy in athletes and primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathies: importance of tissue color Doppler. Arch Mal 1999; 92: 197–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pelliccia A, Maron BJ. Athlete's heart electrocardiogram mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Curr Cardiol Rep 2001; 3(2): 147–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Perk G, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Non‐Doppler two‐dimensional strain imaging by echocardiography: from technical considerations to clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 234–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pelliccia A, Maron BJ, Spataro A, et al. The upper limit of physiologic cardiac hypertrophy in highly trained elite athletes. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 295–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Matuzaki M, Tamitani M, Toma Y, et al. Mechanism of augmented left atrial pump function in myocardial infarction and essential hypertension evaluated by left atrial pressure dimension relation. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 11–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhang G, Yasumura Y, Uematsu M, et al. Echocardiographic determination of left atrial function and its application for assessment of mitral flow velocity pattern. Int J Cardiol 1999; 72: 219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]