Abstract
Systemic allergic reaction to a percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) occlusion device is a rare event with only scattered reports in the literature. Serious allergic reactions to these devices have a poorly defined incidence, presentation, and natural history. We present a woman with a previously unknown nickel allergy who developed severe chest pain beginning the morning after percutaneous device closure of the PFO. Despite multiple visits to her cardiologists and primary care physicians, the cause of her chest pain remained unclear. After seeking a second opinion at our medical center, skin testing showed a severe reaction to nickel. These symptoms were refractory to treatment until device explantation 18 mo later. This case highlights the importance of recognizing nickel allergy as a cause of chest pain following implantation of certain types of devices used for closure of PFOs and other heart defects. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).
References
- 1. Fukahara K, Kazutomo M, Reiss N, Fassbender D, Koerfer R. Systemic allergic reaction to the percutaneous patent foramen ovale occluder. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 213–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dasika UK, Kanter KR, Vincent R. Nickel allergy to the percutaneous patent foramen ovale occluder and subsequent systemic nickel allergy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 2112 (letter to the editor). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bueler WJ, Wang FE. A summary of recent research on the nitinol alloys and their application in ocean engineering. Ocean Eng 1968; 1: 105–120. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ries MW, Kampmann C, Rupprecht H‐J, et al. Nickel release after implantation of the Amplatzer occluder. Am Hear J 2003; 145: 737–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Schafer T, Bohler E, Ruhdorfer S, et al. Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy 2001; 56: 1192–1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Köster R, Vieluf D, Kiehn M, et al. Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in‐stent restenosis. Lancet 2000; 356: 1895–1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gawkrodger DJ. Metal sensitivities and orthopedic implants revisited: The potential for metal allergy with the new metal‐on‐metal joint prostheses. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148: 1089–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Slavin L, Tobis JM, Rangarajan K, et al. Five‐year experience with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1316–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lai DW, Saver JL, Araujo JA, Reidel M, Tobis J. Pericarditis associated with nickel hypersensitivity to the Amplatzer occluder device: a case report. Cathet and Cardiovasc Intervent 2005; 66: 424–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]