Abstract
Background
Although guidelines strongly recommend use of the Emergency Medical Systems (EMS) by patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), it remains underutilized in western countries. Information about its current use in China is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the use of the EMS by patients with AMI in China, and investigate factors affecting its use.
Methods
A prospective survey study, which included 803 patients with AMI who were admitted to 21 hospitals in China between November 1, 2005 and December 31, 2006.
Results
Only 39.5% of patients called up the EMS at the onset of symptoms (EMS group, n = 317), whereas the rest presented to the hospital by some other means (self‐transport group, n = 486, 60.5%). Predictors of EMS users were older age, symptom onset at evening, unbearable symptoms, having received training and acquired knowledge on heart attack, as well as having a higher income and medical history of heart failure or stroke. Prehospital delay (median 110 min vs. 143 min, p < 0.001), door to needle time (median 85 min vs. 93 min, p < 0.005) and door‐to‐balloon time (median 118 min vs. 160 min, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the EMS group. The early reperfusion rate was also significantly higher in the EMS group (84.8% vs. 78.2%, p = 0.019), mainly because of a greater incidence of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (68.1% vs. 61.7%, p = 0.046).
Conclusions
The emergency medical services are underutilized by patients with AMI in China. Use of the EMS may be advantageous in view of greater administration of reperfusion therapy. New public health strategies should be developed to facilitate greater use of the EMS for AMI. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: emergency medical services; acute myocardial infarction; prehospital delay, in‐hospital delay, reperfusion; Chinese
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.7 KB).
Contributor Information
Shouyan Zhang, Email: dayihu2008@163.com.
Dayi Hu, Email: dayihu2008@163.com.
References
- 1. Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Reiber JH, et al.: A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 680–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Brodie B, Stuckey T, Wall T, Kissling G, Hansen CJ, et al.: Importance of time to reperfusion for 30‐day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1312–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger J, Antman EM: Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction; every time of delay counts. Circulation 2004; 109: 1223–1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, Shoultz DA, Levy D, et al.: Relationship of symptom‐onset‐to‐balloon time and door‐to‐balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2000; 283: 2941–2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Berger AK, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM: Factors associated with delay in reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 985–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fitzpatrick B, Watt GC, Tunstall‐Pedoe H: Potential impact of emergency intervention on sudden deaths from coronary heart disease in Glasgow. Br Heart J 1992; 67: 250–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, et al.: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction—executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 671–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Canto JG, Zalenski RJ, Ornato JP, Rogers WJ, Kiefe CI, et al.: Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care observations from the national registry of myocardial infarction 2. Circulation 2002; 106: 3018–3023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Johansson I, Stromberg A, Swahn E: Ambulance use in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol Nurs 2004; 19: 5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Leslie WS, Urie A, Hooper J, Morrison CE: Delay in calling for help during myocardial infarction: reasons for the delay and subsequent pattern of accessing care. Heart 2000; 84: 137–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Goff DC Jr, Feldman HA, McGovern PG: Prehospital delay in patients hospitalized with heart attack symptoms in the United States: the REACT trial: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study Group. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 1046–1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Golberg JR, Steg PD, Sadiq I, Granger CB, Jackson EA, et al.: Extent of, and factors associated with, delay to hospital presentation in patients with acute coronary disease (the GRACE Registry). Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 791–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kerr D, Holden D, Smith J, Kelly AM, Bunker S: Predictors of ambulance use in patients with acute myocardial infarction in Australia. Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 948–952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cabritaa B, Bouyer‐Dallozb F, L'Huillierb I, Dentan G, Zeller M, et al.: Beneficial effects of direct call to emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Emerg Med 2004; 11: 12–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Herlitz J, Karlsson BW, Bang A, Lindqvist J: Characteristics and outcome for patients with acute chest pain in relation to whether or not they were transported by ambulance. Eur J Emerg Med 2000; 7: 195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Faxon D, Lenfant C: Timing is everything: motivating patients to call 9‐1‐1 at onset of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2001; 104: 1210–1211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Siepmann DB, Mann NC, Hedges JR, Daya MR: Association between prepayment systems and emergency medical services use among patients with acute chest discomfort syndrome. For the rapid early action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 573–578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Eppler E, Eisenberg MS, Sehaeffer SS, Meischke H, Larsen MP: 911 and emergency department utilization for chest pain; results of a media campaign. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24: 202–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Luepker RV, Raczynski JM, Osganian S, Goldberg RJ, Finnegan JR Jr, et al.: Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) trial. JAMA 2000; 284(1): 60–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wright RS, Kopecky SL, Timm M, Pflaum DD, Carr C, et al.: Impact of community‐based education on health care evaluation in patients with acute chest pain syndromes: the Wabasha Heart Attack Team (WHAT) project. Fam Pract 2001; 18(5): 537–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]