Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2008 Feb 6;31(2):79–83. doi: 10.1002/clc.20185

The Impact of Computer‐assisted Auscultation on Physician Referrals of Asymptomatic Patients with Heart Murmurs

Raymond L Watrous 1,, W Reid Thompson 2, Stacey J Ackerman 3
PMCID: PMC6653399  PMID: 18257026

Abstract

Background

As many as 50–70% of asymptomatic children referred for specialist evaluation or echocardiography because of a murmur have no heart disease.

Hypothesis

Computer‐assisted auscultation (CAA) can improve the sensitivity and specificity of referrals for evaluation of heart murmurs.

Methods

Seven board‐certified primary care physicians were evaluated both without and with use of a computer‐based decision‐support system using 100 prerecorded patient heart sounds (55 innocent murmurs, 30 pathological murmurs, 15 without murmur). The sensitivity and specificity of their murmur referral decisions relative to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines, and sensitivity and specificity of murmur detection and characterization (innocent versus pathological) were measured.

Results

Sensitivity for detection of murmurs significantly increased with use of CAA from 76.6 to 89.1% (p <0.001), while specificity remained unaffected (80.0 versus 81.0%). Computer‐assisted auscultation improved sensitivity of correctly identifying pathological murmur cases from 82.4 to 90.0%, and specificity of correctly identifying benign cases (with innocent or no murmurs) from 74.9 to 88.8%. (p <0.001). Referral sensitivity increased from 86.7 to 92.9%, while specificity increased from 63.5 to 78.6% using CAA (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Computer‐assisted auscultation appears to be a promising new technology for informing the referral decisions of primary care physicians. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: computer‐assisted auscultation, cardiac auscultation, heart murmurs

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (818.6 KB).

References

  • 1. Chizner MA: The diagnosis of heart disease by clinical assessment alone. Curr Probl Cardiol 2001; 26: 285–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Du ZD, Roguin N, Barak M: Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation of neonates with heart murmurs. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86: 752–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Etchells E, Bell C, Robb K: Does this patient have an abnormal systolic murmur? JAMA 1997; 277: 564–571. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Haney I, Ipp M, Feldman W, McCrindle BW: Accuracy of clinical assessment of heart murmurs by office based (general practice) paediatricians. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81: 409–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. McCrindle BW, Shaffer KM, Kan JS, Zahka KG, Rowe SA, et al.: Cardinal clinical signs in the differentiation of heart murmurs in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996; 150: 169–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Roldan CA, Shively BK, Crawford MH: Value of the cardiovascular physical examination for detecting valvular heart disease in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 1327–1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Danford DA, Nasir A, Gumbiner C: Cost assessment of the evaluation of heart murmurs in children. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 365–368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Xu M, McHaffie DJ: Nonspecific systolic murmurs: an audit of the clinical value of echocardiography. N Z Med J 1993; 106: 54–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Thompson WR, Hayek CS, Tuchinda C, Telford JK, Lombardo JS: Automated cardiac auscultation for detection of pathologic heart murmurs. Pediatr Cardiol 2001; 22: 373–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Watrous RL, Bedynek J, Oskiper T, Grove DM: Computer‐assisted detection of systolic murmurs associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a pilot study. Tex Heart Inst J 2004; 31: 368–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease . A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1486–1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tuchinda C, Thompson WR. Cardiac auscultatory recording database: delivering heart sounds through the Internet. In Proceeding AMIA Symposium, Washington, D.C. 2001; 716–720. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13. Gamero LG, Watrous RL: Detection of the first and second heart sound using probabilistic models. 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico. 2003; 25: 2877–2880. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Oskiper T, Watrous RL. Detection of the first heart sound using a time‐delay neural network, computers in cardiology, Memphis, TN, September 22–25, 2002.
  • 15. Obuchowski NA, Beiden SV, Berbaum KS, Hillis SL, Ishwaran H, et al.: Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis: an empirical comparison of five methods. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 980–995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES