Abstract
Background
One of the clinical hallmarks of constrictive pericarditis is the pericardial knock, a high‐pitched early diastolic heart sound. Making the clinical diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis is challenging, as is accurate auscultation of the pericardial knock.
Hypothesis
We sought to assess the utility of a computerized acoustic cardiographic device in the assessment of the pericardial knock in patients with constrictive pericarditis.
Methods
We report a case series in which computerized acoustic cardiography (Audicor, Inovise Medical Inc., Portland, OR) is performed in patients with constrictive pericarditis.
Results
Three patients with constrictive pericarditis underwent computerized acoustic cardiographic recordings at the time of cardiac catheterization. In each case, initial physical examination by the internist and referring cardiologist did not appreciate a pericardial knock. Acoustic cardiography demonstrated a high‐pitched early diastolic sound in each case. Time‐frequency representation analyses showed the high‐frequency components of the pericardial knock sound. Repeat acoustic cardiography demonstrated resolution of the pericardial knock after pericardiectomy in two patients.
Conclusions
Non‐invasive computerized acoustic cardiography can demonstrate the high‐pitched pericardial knock in patients with constrictive pericarditis. This may aid the bedside assessment of patients with diastolic heart failure, improving the clinician's ability to appreciate the ausculatory findings in constrictive pericarditis. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: constrictive pericarditis, phonocardiography, auscultation, pericardiectomy, pericardial knock, acoustic cardiography
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.9 MB).
References
- 1. Chatterjee K, Alpert J: Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: similarities and differences. Heart Fail Monit 2003; 3: 118–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kern MJ, Aguirre F: Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure waveform analysis: pericardial compressive hemodynamics, part II. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 26: 34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ling LH, Oh JK, Breen JF, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, et al.: Calcific constrictive pericarditis: is it still with us? Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 444–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hatle LK, Appleton CP, Popp RL: Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1989; 79: 357–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB: Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 182: 369–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hancock EW: Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis. Heart 2001; 86: 343–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rajagopalan N, Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L, Murray RD, Apperson‐Hansen C, et al.: Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 86–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Giorgi B, Mollet NRA, Dymarkowski S, Rademakers FE, Bogaert J: Clinically suspected constrictive pericarditis: MR imaging assessment of ventricular septal motion and configuration in patients and healthy subjects. Radiology 2003; 228: 417–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tyberg TI, Goodyer AV, Langou RA: Genesis of pericardial knock in constrictive pericarditis. Am J Cardiol 1980; 46: 570–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lorell BH: Pericardial diseases In Heart Disease: a Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. (Eds. Braunwald E.), p 1499 Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tavel ME: Phonocardiography: clinical use with and without combined echocardiography. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1983; 26: 145–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kern MJ, Aguirre F: Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure waveform analysis: Pericardial compressive hemodynamics, Part I. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 25: 336–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kern MJ, Aguirre F: Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure waveform analysis: Pericardial compressive hemodynamics, Part III. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992; 26: 152–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Leya FS, Arab D, Joyal D, Shioura KM, Lewis BE, et al.: The efficacy of brain natriuretic peptide levels in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1900–1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Meaney E, Shabetai R, Bhargava V, Shearer M, Weidner C, et al.: Cardiac amyloidosis, constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 547–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lange RL, Botticelli JT, Tsagaris TJ, Walker JA, Gani M, et al.: Diagnostic signs in compressive cardiac disorders–constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion and tamponade. Circulation 1966; 33: 763–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Spodick DH, Kumar S: Subacute constrictive pericarditis with cardiac tamponade. Dis Chest 1968; 54: 62–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hancock EW: Subacute effusive‐constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 1971; 43: 183–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Marcus G, Gerber IL, McKeown B, Vessey J, Jordan MV, et al.: Association between phonocardiographic third and fourth heart sounds and objective measures of left ventricular function. JAMA 2005; 293: 2238–2244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]