Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2007 Aug 2;30(7):331–335. doi: 10.1002/clc.20096

Clinical Implications of Precordial ST‐segment Elevation in Acute Inferoposterior Myocardial Infarction Caused by Proximal Right Coronary Artery Occlusion

Man‐Hong Jim 1,✉, Annie On‐On Chan 1, Chun‐Pong Wong 2, Kai‐Hang Yiu 2, Raymond Miu 2, Stephen Wai‐Luen Lee 2, Chu‐Pak Lau MD 2
PMCID: PMC6653570  PMID: 17674377

Abstract

Background

The clinical significance of inferior wall acute myocardial infarction (MI) with combined ST‐segment elevation in both anterior and inferior leads, compared with inferior leads alone, is unknown.

Hypothesis

Despite having more leads with precordial ST‐segment elevation, these patients may have a better outcome due to less posterior involvement, which tends to drag down the precordial ST‐segment.

Methods

A total of 158 postinferior MI patients with documented proximal right coronary artery occlusion were retrospectively studied. They were divided into three subgroups according to the magnitude of concurrent ST‐segment deviation in lead V2: Group A (n = 19) had ST‐segment elevation ≥ 2.0 mm; Group B (n = 74) had ST‐segment lay between + 2.0 mm and − 2.0 mm; and Group C (n = 65) had ST‐segment depression ≥ 2.0 mm. The clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics were then compared among these threes subgroups.

Results

The baseline demography, prevalence of risk factors, and treatment received were of no difference among the subgroups. However, Group A patients had significantly lower peak creatinine phosphokinase level and more preserved left ventricular function than Group B and C. Moreover, they had lower total sum of inferior ST‐segment magnitude, less ST‐segment depression in V4‐6, and more ST‐segment elevation in V4R than Group C. Group C patients had highest in‐hospital and one‐year mortality although it did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

Precordial ST‐segment elevation in inferior wall acute MI was associated with smaller infarct size and better left ventricular function, probably secondary to occlusion of a less dominant RCA, which did not result in a significant posterior infarction. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: electrocardiography, acute myocardial infarction

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (754.8 KB).

References

  • 1. Sadanandan S, Hochman JS, Kolodziej A, Criger DA, Ross A, et al.: Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients with combined anterior and inferior ST‐segment elevation on the initial electrocardiogram during acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 631–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sasaki K, Yotsukura M, Sakata K, Yoshino H, Ishikawa K: Relation of ST‐segment changes in inferior leads during anterior wall acute myocardial infarction to length and occlusion site of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 1340–1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yip HK, Chen MC, Wu CJ, Chang HW, Yu TH, et al.: Acute myocardial infarction with simultaneous ST‐segment elevation in the precordial and inferior leads. Evaluation of anatomic lesions and clinical implications. Chest 2003; 123: 1170–1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sapin PM, Musselman DR, Dehmer GJ, Cascio WE: Implications of inferior ST‐segment elevation accompanying anterior wall acute myocardial infarction for the angiographic morphology of the left anterior descending coronary artery morphology and site of occlusion. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 860–865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Khan ZU, Chou TC: Right ventricular infarction mimicking acute anteroseptal left ventricular infarction. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 1089–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Geft IL, Shah PK, Rodriguez L, Hulse S, Maddahi J, et al.: ST elevations in leads V1 to V5 may be caused by right coronary artery occlusion and acute right ventricular infarction. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 991–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Porter A, Herz I, Strasberg B: Isolated right ventricular infarction presenting as anterior wall myocardial infarction on electrocardiography. Clin Cardiol 1997; 20: 971–973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Celiik T, Yuksel UC, Kursaklioglu H, Iyisoy A, Kose S, et al.: Precordial ST‐segment elevation in acute occlusion of the proximal right coronary artery. J Electrocardiol 2006; 39: 301–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Carroll R, Sharma N, Butt A, Hussain KM: Unusual electrocardiographic presentation of an isolated right ventricular myocardial infarction secondary to thrombotic occlusion of a non‐dominant right coronary artery–a case report and brief review of literature. Angiology 2003; 54: 119–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fantidis P, Coma‐Canella I, Peinado MJ, Padron A, Lopez‐Sendon JL: A new experimental model of isolated myocardial ischemic injury. ECG findings of acute isolated right ventricular ischemic injury. J Electrocardiol 1997; 30: 71–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, et al.: ACC / AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33(6): 1756–1824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Aldrich HR, Wagner NB, Boswick J, Corsa AT, Jones MG, et al.: Use of initial ST‐segment deviation for prediction of final electrocardiographic size of acute myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 749–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hathaway WR, Peterson ED, Wagner GS, Granger CB, Zabel KM, et al.: Prognostic significance of the initial electrocardiogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 1998; 279: 387–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Peterson ED, Hathaway WR, Zabel KM, Pieper KS, Granger CB, et al.: Prognostic significance of precordial ST segment depression during inferior myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: results in 16,521 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 305–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gibson RS, Crampton RS, Watson DD, Taylor GJ, Carabello BA, et al.: Precordial ST‐segment depression during acute inferior myocardial infarction: clinical, scintigraphic and angiographic correlations. Circulation 1982; 66: 732–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lew AS, Weiss AT, Shah PK, Maddahi J, Peter T, et al.: Precordial ST segment depression during acute inferior myocardial infarction: early thallium‐201 scintigraphic evidence of adjacent posterolateral or inferoapical involvement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 203–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nishian K, Nomoto Y, Naruse H, Kawakami K, Asakuma S, et al.: Precordial ST segment depression in acute inferior myocardial infarction: the importance of posterolateral wall infarction. J Cardiol 1989; 19: 413–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, Hongo Y, Shigemasa T, et al.: Implications of the absence of ST‐segment elevation in lead V4R in patients who have inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement. Clin Cardiol 2001; 24: 225–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES