Abstract
Background
Current guidelines suggest the use of atrial synchronous mode (VDD) pacemakers in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinus node function. However VDD mode is being used much less than expected. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the efficacy of VDD pacing in long‐term follow‐up and to find risk factors for VDD loss.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated all patients with VDD pacemakers who were implanted in our center between 1995 and 2007.
Results
During the study period, 123 consecutive patients with AV block (51% men, age 62 ± 17.8 years) received a VDD pacemaker. Mean follow up duration was 4.5 ± 3.2 years. At the last follow up visit, 21 patients (21.6%) lost their original VDD mode and were programmed to ventricular‐based pacing (VVIR) (undersensing, 11; chronic AF, 7; SND, 3). In 28 patients, VDD mode was restored or maintained by increasing atrial sensitivity. No episodes of atrial oversensing were observed. In multivariate analysis history of paroxysmal AF (p = 0.007, odds ratio 36.6, 95% confidence interval 2.7–493.7) and p wave lower than 1 mv during the follow up (p = 0.021, odds ratio 7, 95% confidence interval 1.3–36.7), were found risk factors to VDD loss.
Conclusions
VDD pacing has good long‐term performance. Absence of paroxysmal AF history predicts maintenance of VDD pacing mode. Taking into account that no atrial oversensing was observed, our recommendation is to increase atrial sensitivity when P wave amplitude declines to less than 1 mv. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.1 KB).
References
- 1. Nowak B, Voigtlander T, Himmrich E, et al. Cardiac output in single lead VDD pacing versus rate matched VVIR pacing. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 904–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Radiker DE, Eagle KA, Homma S, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Menozzi C, Brignole M, Morrachini PV, et al. Intrapatient comparison between chronic VVIR and DDD pacing in patients affected by high degree AV block without heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990; 13: 1816–1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1385–1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wiegand UKH, Bode F, Schneider R, et al. Atrial sensing and AV synchrony in single lead VDD pacemakers: a comparison to DDD devices with bipolar atrial leads. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1999; 10: 513–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wiegand UKH, Potratz J, Bode F, et al. Cost effectiveness of dual chamber pacemaker therapy: does single lead VDD pacing reduce treatment costs of atrioventricular block? Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 174–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Momd HG, Irwin M, Morillo C, et al. The world survey of cardiac pacing and cardioverter defibrillators: calendar year 2001. PACE 2004; 27: 955–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pitts Crick JC; for the European Multi Center Study Group. European multi center prospective follow up study of 1002 implants of a single lead VDD pacing system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991; 14: 1742–1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ray JL, Tribouilloy C, Elghelbazouri F, et al. Single lead VDD pacing: long experience with four different systems. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 1036–1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chamberlain‐Webber R, Barnes E, Papouchado M, et al. Long term survival of VDD pacing. J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 2246–2248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Huang M, Krahn AD, Yee R, et al. Optimal pacing for symptomatic AV block: a comparison of VDD and DDD pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 2230–2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Naegeli B, Osswald S, Pfisterer M, et al. VDD pacing: short and long term stability of atrial sensing with a new single lead system. PACE 1996; 19: 454–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wiegand UK, Nowak B, Reisp U, Peiffer T, Bode F, Potratz J. Implantation strategy of the atrial dipole impacts atrial sensing performance of single lead VDD pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 316–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Santini M, Ricci R, Pignalberi C, et al. Immediate and long term atrial sensing stability in single lead VDD pacing depends on rt atrial dimensions. Europace 2001; 3: 324–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schaer BA, Weinbacher M, Zellweger CS, Osswald S. Value of VDD pacing systems in patients with atrioventricular block: experience over a decade. Int J Cardiol 2007; 122: 239–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zupan I, Lipar L, Zizek D, et al. Retrospective analysis of mode survival, reliability of atrial sensing and incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in 307 single lead VDD pacemaker patients. Europace 2006; 8: 855–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]