Abstract
Background
Identifying vulnerable plaque is important for preventing an acute coronary event. The present study examined the relationship between the clinical presentation of coronary artery disease and the plaque characteristics of nonculprit segment assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH‐IVUS).
Method
We performed VH‐IVUS analysis on nonculprit segments with < 50% diameter stenosis in 91 patients (48 acute coronary syndrome [ACS] patients, 43 stable angina [SA] patients).
Results
ACS patients showed significantly higher ratio of dense calcium (7.9% ± 1.0% versus 5.0% ± 0.9%, p = 0.03) and necrotic core plaque (13.7% ± 1.1% versus 8.6% ± 1.1%, p = 0.001) compared with SA patients. VH‐IVUS‐derived thin‐cap fibroatheroma (VH‐TCFA) was more frequently observed in ACS patients compared with SA patients (64.6% versus 35.7%, p = 0.006). Among ACS patients, plasma high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) levels were significantly higher in patients with VH‐TCFA than in patients without VH‐TCFA (7.9 ± 2.6 mg/l versus 1.6 ± 0.3 mg/l, p = 0.004).
Conclusion
ACS patients presented higher prevalence of VH‐TCFA in nonculprit segment. Presence of VH‐TCFA was associated with an increased level of plasma hs‐CRP in ACS patients. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (705.4 KB).
References
- 1. Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, et al. Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation 2002; 106: 2200–2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nair A, Margolis P, Kuban BD, Vince G. Automated coronary plaque characterization with intravascular ultrasound backscatter: ex vivo validation. EuroInterv 2007; 3: 113–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for the acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1478–1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rodriguez‐Granillo GA, Gracia‐Gracia HM, McFadden EP, et al. In vivo intravascular ultrasound‐derived thin‐cap fibroatheroma detection using ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 2038–2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rodriguez‐Granillo GA, McFadden EP, Valgimigli M, et al. Coronary plaque composition of nonculprit lesions, assessed by in vivo intracoronary ultrasound radio frequency data analysis, is related to clinical presentation. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 1020–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jang IK, Tearney GJ, MacNeill B, et al. In vivo characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by use of optical coherence tomography. Circulation 2005; 111: 1551–1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 56–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD, et al. Five‐year angiographic follow‐up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). CASS Participating Investigators and Staff. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1141–1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Davies MJ, Richardson PD, Woolf N, Katz DR, Mann J. Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content. Br Heart J 1993; 69: 377–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, et al. Healed plaque ruptures and sudden coronary death: evidence that subclinical rupture has a role in plaque progression. Circulation 2001; 103: 934–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 1262–1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, et al. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 915–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rioufol G, Finet G, Ginon I, et al. Multiple atherosclerotic plaque rupture in acute coronary syndrome: a three‐vessel intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2002; 106: 804–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Asakura M, Ueda Y, Yamaguchi O, et al. Extensive development of vulnerable plaques as a pan‐coronary process in patients with myocardial infarction: an angioscopic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1284–1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, et al. Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: An inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 115–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]