Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2009 Aug 14;32(8):439–441. doi: 10.1002/clc.20555

Echocardiography for Determining the Optimal Atrioventricular Interval in Patients with Dual Chamber Pacemakers

Pin Sun 1,, Qing Zhao 2, Zhi‐Bin Wang 1, Jian‐Sheng Li 1, Jin‐Shan Wo 2, Shang‐Lang Cai 2
PMCID: PMC6653618  PMID: 19685516

Abstract

Background

We investigated the clinical value of Doppler echocardiography for determining the optimal setting of atrioventricular interval in patients with dual chamber pacemakers (DDD). In 38 patients with complete atrioventricular block and DDD pacemakers, the atrioventricular interval was prolonged in a stepwise fashion by 20 ms, from 90 to 250 ms, and cardiac stroke volume and transmitral flow were measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography.

Methods

The optimal atrioventricular interval at which the cardiac stroke volume was maximal was 168.9 ± 15.6 ms. The atrioventricular interval was 178.4 ± 23.4 ms when the end of the A wave coincided with complete closure of the mitral valve.

Results

There was a significant linear relationship between the optimal atrioventricular interval and the predicted optimal atrioventricular interval (Y = 86.2 ± 0.5X, r = 0.70, standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 11.5, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The optimal atrioventricular interval setting for DDD pacing can be successfully determined using Doppler echocardiography, which is a noninvasive, repeatable, and simple approach. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.9 KB).

References

  • 1. van Campen CM, de Cock CC, Kamp O, Visser CA. Differences in pacing from the atrial appendage and the lateral atrial free wall on left ventricular filling and haemodynamics during DDD pacing. Europace 2001; 3: 52–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barba‐Pichardo R, Moriña‐Vázquez P, Venegas‐Gamero J, Maroto‐Monserrat F, Cid‐Cumplido M, Herrera‐Carranza M. Permanent His‐bundle pacing in patients with infra‐Hisian atrioventricular block. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 553–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Linhart A, Lubanda JC, Palecek T, et al. Cardiac manifestations in Fabry disease. J Inherit Metab Dis 2001; 24: 75–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barold SS, Ilercil A, Leonelli F, Herweg B. First‐degree atrioventricular block. Clinical manifestations, indications for pacing, pacemaker management and consequences during cardiac resynchronization. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 139–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Takabayashi S, Shimpo H, Mitani Y, Komada Y. Pediatric cardiac remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pediatr Cardiol 2006; 27: 485–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tse HF, Yu C, Park E, Lau CP. Impedance cardiography for atrioventricular interval optimization during permanent left ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 189–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ismer B, Von Knorre GH, Voss W, et al. Exercise induced sympathetic influences do not change interatrial conduction times in VDD and DDD pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 1786–1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Topilski I, Sherez J, Keren G, Copperman I. Long‐term effects of dual‐chamber pacing with periodic echocardiographic evaluation of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy > 50 years of age. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1769–1775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kerlan JE, Sawhney NS, Waggoner AD, et al. Prospective comparison of echocardiographic atrioventricular delay optimization methods for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm 2006; 3: 148–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pearson AC, Janosik DL, Redd RM, Buckingham TA, Labovitz AJ. Hemodynamic benefit of atrioventricular synchrony: prediction from baseline Doppler‐echocardiographic variables. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 1613–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stiles MK, Sanders P, Disney P, et al. Differential effects of intravenous magnesium on atrioventricular node conduction in supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 1249–1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kato M, Dote K, Sasaki S, et al. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 892–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wu LQ, Gu G, Cao M, Shen YC, Su K, Shen WF. Optimization of atrioventricular delay by surface electrocardiography during dual chamber pacing. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006; 119: 454–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rossi R, Molinari R, Carcagní A, Mattioli AV, Modena MG. Shortening of atrioventricular interval improves ventricular filling and clinical outcome in patients with DDD pacemaker and left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiologia 1996; 41: 441–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES